Keir Rodney Starmer to warn the nation that 'things will only get worse' and worse and worse....

[numnuts]

On 1/17/2025 at 6:23 PM, numnuts said:

Right, as everyone well knows, Kaiser Keir doesn't have the authority to fly around the world signing 100 year pacts. A pointless news article, a pointless pact and a pointless Kaiser, who will seen be booted out of office. The pointless pact can then be chucked down some old, disused London well and Joe Public can use it as an emergency urination point, for the next 100 years or so. I would suggest that another aspect, to this very cheap PTB stunt, is to try and cast Keir as some sort of authority figure. Reason being, to try and get more folks to accept whatever he soon tries to do, when it comes to reversing Brexit. Yawn... 

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgem31jekvo

 

'UK pledges support for Ukraine with 100-year pact.'

 

Sir Keir said the apparent air raid that greeted him in Kyiv was a "reminder of the daily attacks and the resolve of the Ukrainian people". "We are with you not just today, for this year or the next - but for 100 years - long after this terrible war is over and Ukraine is free and thriving once again," he told Zelensky in Kyiv. He also said that the UK would work with all its allies to ensure that any deal ending the war would be strong enough to "guarantee Ukraine's security" and "deter any future aggression."

 

The latest pledges build on the £12.8bn the UK has already given to Ukraine and commitments of £3bn every year for "as long as it takes". As well as military support, including the delivery of a new mobile air defence system to be designed in the UK and funded by Denmark, the accord includes economic aid, support for healthcare, and increased military collaboration on maritime security and drone technology. The UK will also continue to train Ukrainian troops. More than 50,000 have been trained on British soil so far.

 

Thursday's announced partnership, formed of a treaty and a political declaration, is due to be presented to Parliament in the coming weeks. Plans for it began under the previous Conservative government. While this is his first visit as prime minister, Sir Keir visited Ukraine when he was leader of the opposition in 2023, and has hosted Zelensky twice at Downing Street since entering office. (Um, don't you 'present' something to parliament, before signing it?)

 

 

I made the above quoted post on another thread. It really is Kaiser Keir time.

Edited January 19 by numnuts

[Talorgan]

Ever little helps with the austerity programme as poor people are easier to control 

[Anti Facts Sir]

labour had a mini-cabinet the last time they were in a power. It was known as Tony Blair's sofa. Tone, Gord, Alisdair Wotshisname and Manhandlerson used to run the country that way.

[cemeterycrow]

[numnuts]

On 1/19/2025 at 11:10 PM, Anti Facts Sir said:

labour had a mini-cabinet the last time they were in a power. It was known as Tony Blair's sofa. Tone, Gord, Alisdair Wotshisname and Manhandlerson used to run the country that way.

 

They at least tried to be a bit more subtle about it back then. Meanwhile, look who's talking...

 

[Anti Facts Sir]

And now looky what's happened in Germany today.

 

Every nation still in lockstep it seems. Scamdemics. False Flags, all the same to them.

[SoundOfSilence]

3 hours ago, numnuts said:

 

They at least tried to be a bit more subtle about it back then. Meanwhile, look who's talking...

 

Isn't there a typo on the front page?

 

Shouldn't that read "Wills [ugh ... vomit] 'works up a sweat' to fight the homeless?

[numnuts]

I find it quite disturbing that those who followed orders and rolled up their sleeves, only to then pay the price, are now going to be targeted by the likes of Starmer and Reeves. And, quite likely, that will be after at least some of them got turned away from the vaccine-injured compensation scheme, for not being disabled enough.

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgkje8vj84ro

 

'Labour ministers tread carefully as welfare reform looms.'

 

In Rachel Reeves's big speech on growth this week, she vowed that to achieve "fundamental" reform of the welfare system, the government would look at areas that have been "ducked for too long, like the rising cost of health and disability benefits".

 

Ministers are concerned by a situation in which the amount of people who are in receipt of certain benefits has surged. Meanwhile, the Treasury needs to ensure that it is not on course to break its own self-imposed fiscal rules.

 

Last year, the government spent £65bn on sickness benefits - a 25% increase from the year before the pandemic. That figure is forecast to increase to around £100bn before the next general election. Some of this is the legacy of Covid. But the chancellor has made clear her view that another reason for this surge is the "perverse incentives" wired into the system. (More like almost all of it is the legacy of something else.)

[numnuts]

Given all of the recent revelations, I did have to chuckle.

 

 

'Reeves plans return to the EU, by the back door.'

 

[numnuts]

That's some headline, for the front page of The Times. And, like, Gen Z haven't noticed the dictator yet?

 

 

'Half of Gen Z want Britain to be ruled by a dictator.'

 

Edited February 1 by numnuts

[NeoScota]

1 hour ago, numnuts said:

I find it quite disturbing that those who followed orders and rolled up their sleeves, only to then pay the price, are now going to be targeted by the likes of Starmer and Reeves. And, quite likely, that will be after at least some of them got turned away from the vaccine-injured compensation scheme, for not being disabled enough.

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgkje8vj84ro

 

'Labour ministers tread carefully as welfare reform looms.'

 

In Rachel Reeves's big speech on growth this week, she vowed that to achieve "fundamental" reform of the welfare system, the government would look at areas that have been "ducked for too long, like the rising cost of health and disability benefits".

 

Ministers are concerned by a situation in which the amount of people who are in receipt of certain benefits has surged. Meanwhile, the Treasury needs to ensure that it is not on course to break its own self-imposed fiscal rules.

 

Last year, the government spent £65bn on sickness benefits - a 25% increase from the year before the pandemic. That figure is forecast to increase to around £100bn before the next general election. Some of this is the legacy of Covid. But the chancellor has made clear her view that another reason for this surge is the "perverse incentives" wired into the system. (More like almost all of it is the legacy of something else.)

Yip they created the extra disabilities, and will then turn them away.

 

However, there will be a lot of those new claimants who will have slagged off the disabled as benefit scroungers previously. 

The hate and stigma is real towards the disabled whether working or not, and I have experienced it myself from these twats. 

[NeoScota]

1 hour ago, numnuts said:

Given all of the recent revelations, I did have to chuckle.

 

 

'Reeves plans return to the EU, by the back door.'

 

By the back door and she's going in dry

[numnuts]

From memory, essentially, so-called Partygate was all to do with politicians breaking rules and telling porkies. It culminated with the resignation of BoJo as U.K. prime minister. Starmer, Rayner, Reeves et al, when sitting on the opposition benches, did an awful lot of moralising. And yet, we now have the likes of Rayner trying to convince us that we were 'promised' these changes in Labour's general election manifesto. If anyone goes down their local High Street on a Saturday afternoon and asks 100 people 'Did you have any idea that anything remotely like this was coming?', based on Labour's general election manifesto, then I guarantee that they will all say 'No'. Furthermore, if the people don't want it, then you can't possibly attempt to sell it as 'devolution'. So, why are the MSM not now branding this as Councilgate and continually beating their resignation drum, until Starmer, Rayner, Reeves et al have all been forced to sod off? Or, at least until they have agreed that referendums should be held, in any affected areas. After all, the levels of bullshit involved far exceed anything Partygate-related. 

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9qjdex1ed8o

 

'Council shake-up sees elections delayed in nine areas.'

 

Local elections in East Sussex, West Sussex, Essex, Thurrock, Hampshire, the Isle of Wight, Norfolk, Suffolk and Surrey will be delayed for one year to allow major reorganisations to take place, Local Government Secretary Angela Rayner has said. Speaking to Parliament, Rayner said the postponement would pave the way for a "generational power shift from Whitehall to the town hall". She said that holding elections for authorities that were due to be scrapped would be "an expensive and irresponsible waste of taxpayers' money". (Let's have some referendums then, so as to see if the people who will be affected by this want it to happen or not. Simples.)

 

Conservative shadow minister Kevin Hollinrake said the "mass postponement" was a "worrying day for democracy". The shake-up of local councils, announced by the government last year, will see smaller district councils merged with local county councils to create single bodies known as unitary authorities. The new bodies would represent populations of around 500,000. Hollinrake accused Rayner of "creating a new tier of Orwellian-sounding, strategic authorities which are closer to her and closer to Whitehall". He added: "These are for her to use as a pawn to implement this government's deeply unpopular socialist agenda." (Sums it all up quite nicely.)

 

Co-leader of the Green Party Adrian Ramsay expressed concern that the changes would mean "centralising power from local communities to remote county councils". He added that without elections, county councillors would have no mandate to negotiate the new structures. Councillor Marianne Overton, leader of the Independent Network of Councillors across England and Wales, said: "There is still no clarity on how the cost of reorganisation will be met beyond asset stripping existing councils. "This will move democracy further away from residents, putting power into the hands of the few, not the many." (True, but referendums must also be held by all district councils that have decided this is a good idea.) 

 

 

Edited February 9 by numnuts

[NeoScota]

On 2/1/2025 at 6:45 PM, numnuts said:

That's some headline, for the front page of The Times. And, like, Gen Z haven't noticed the dictator yet?

 

 

'Half of Gen Z want Britain to be ruled by a dictator.'

 

Half of Gen Z are so clueless, they can't figure out why they are called Gen Z. 

 

Imagine being so bone idle that you would rather have a dictator so you don't have to bother thinking about that kinda shit. 

My son's 27 and he is thankfully not like this, though he rolled his sleeve up to keep his job :(

[k_j_evans]

1 hour ago, NeoScota said:

Half of Gen Z are so clueless, they can't figure out why they are called Gen Z. 

 

Imagine being so bone idle that you would rather have a dictator so you don't have to bother thinking about that kinda shit. 

My son's 27 and he is thankfully not like this, though he rolled his sleeve up to keep his job :(

 

On 2/1/2025 at 6:45 PM, numnuts said:

That's some headline, for the front page of The Times. And, like, Gen Z haven't noticed the dictator yet?

 

 

'Half of Gen Z want Britain to be ruled by a dictator.'

 

 

So why don't they all move to North Korea?

[numnuts]

On 1/19/2025 at 3:32 PM, numnuts said:

I made the above quoted post on another thread. It really is Kaiser Keir time.

 

This news story is from last week, but note how the lingo used refers to 'world leaders and decision makers'. Not advisors, but decision-makers. I never used to hear stuff like that. Who are these decision-makers that the article's author, Frank Gardner, is referring to? I would like to know.

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjex5w1z02do

 

'Leaders set for key security meeting as 'old' world order at risk of crumbling.'

 

The US Vice President, JD Vance, Ukraine's President Zelensky and up to 60 other world leaders and decision-makers are due to convene in Munich over the next three days for the annual Munich Security Conference (MSC). For nearly two decades now I have been attending and covering this event for the BBC and I cannot think of a year when there has been so much at stake in terms of global security. A senior and highly experienced Western official said this week "this is the most dangerous and contested time I have ever known in my career".

[numnuts]

More portraying of Kasier Keir as an authority figure...

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gxgxl3grgo

 

'PM 'ready' to put troops on ground in Ukraine to protect peace.'

 

Sir Keir Starmer has said he is "ready and willing" to put UK troops on the ground in Ukraine to help guarantee its security as part of a peace deal. The UK prime minister said securing a lasting peace in Ukraine was "essential if we are to deter Putin from further aggression in the future". Before attending an emergency summit with European leaders in Paris on Monday, Sir Keir said the UK was prepared to contribute to security guarantees to Ukraine by "putting our own troops on the ground if necessary". "I do not say that lightly," he wrote in the Daily Telegraph. "I feel very deeply the responsibility that comes with potentially putting British servicemen and women in harm's way." (This is for parliament to debate and decide; not Kaiser Keir.)

 

The prime minister added: "But any role in helping to guarantee Ukraine's security is helping to guarantee the security of our continent, and the security of this country." The end of Russia's war with Ukraine "when it comes, cannot merely become a temporary pause before Putin attacks again", Sir Keir said. UK troops could be deployed alongside soldiers from other European nations alongside the border between Ukrainian-held and Russian-held territory. Sir Keir's announcement comes after the former head of the Army, Lord Dannatt, told the BBC the UK military was "so run down" it could not lead any future peacekeeping mission in Ukraine. The PM has previously only hinted that British troops could be involved in safeguarding Ukraine after a ceasefire. (The only reason that the PTB want U.K. troops in Ukraine is so that they are ready to be triggered in to a war. It is not for peacekeeping purposes.)

[numnuts]

Too funny...

 

 

[numnuts]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gwngxdd1vo

 

'US isolation threatens global democracy, warns Major.'

 

Sir John Major has warned that democracy is under threat as the United States steps back from its leading role in the world. The former prime minister told the BBC that US President Donald Trump's policy of American "isolation" was creating a power vacuum that would embolden nations like Russia and China. Sir John, who was PM from 1990 to 1997, said the gains made since the collapse of the Soviet Union were now being reversed - and that there was "no doubt" Russia would invade elsewhere before long. He said that "ugly nationalism" growing concurrently was making for a "very unsettled time". (He must be talking about Israel, right?)

[numnuts]

It is now much more obvious as to why this new unit was set up, back in the summer of 2023. As I stated on another thread, the impression given was that the need for this new unit was all down to a shortage of men on the ground, as in deployable during emergencies. However, the article stated that it would also be involved with 'surveillance'. It didn't ring true to me.

 

 

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1781773/Razor-Squadron-armed-forces-counter-terrorism

 

'Britain gets new elite terror troops to support police and MI5.'

 

Military chiefs have formed a new domestic counter-terror unit to offset pressure on Britain’s Special Forces. Razor Squadron is the first new special operations team to be established since the creation of the Special Forces Support Group at the start of the Afghanistan war. The new unit will support police and MI5 in counter-terror operations. Duties will include surveillance, hostage rescue and rapidly organising cordons across the motorway network. Boasting 230 specially-trained troops from across the Armed Forces, it is based in Hereford, the home of the SAS. Despite its Army-sounding pedigree, however, three-quarters of its complement are currently drawn from the Royal Marines, sources say.

[Mr H]

Alex Krainer put forward an interesting theory. Maybe unlikely but certainly non zero probability.

 

He thinks the UK is so disturbed by Us and Russia hooking up, they're going to sacrifice Starmer let him get assassinated and blame it in the Russians........

[numnuts]

The message now seems to be that Kaiser Keir can do anything he likes. Apparently, it was all 'his own decision', after he had made 'a personal assessment' of the current geopolitical situation. 

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgdyqx1zy6o

 

'Starmer upends Labour manifesto to confront Europe's new reality.'

 

A big moment and a big decision, ahead of a big meeting. The government's announcement that it will crank up defence spending and shrivel the international aid budget amounts to a big shift in strategy, posture and political positioning. Take a look at the Labour Party's election manifesto, written less than a year ago, if you would like proof of that. On page 125, it says: "Labour is committed to restoring development spending at the level of 0.7 per cent of gross national income as soon as fiscal circumstances allow." The party is now committing to doing the precise opposite – cutting development spending by the same amount it had promised to raise it by.

Edited February 26 by numnuts

[Recluse52]

Prime Minister needs to do a Hugh Grant to Trump. He has been summoned to the White House to seek audience with the Orange god. Makes me want to throw up

[1velocity7]

 

[SimonTV]

Tommy Robinson being kept in Cambodia prison like conditions under the Starmer regime for basically exposing the government's lies when it comes to covering up the crimes of a Syrian migrant within the school system.