Keir Rodney Starmer to warn the nation that 'things will only get worse' and worse and worse....

[SoundOfSilence]

17 hours ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

 

I think the Chinese have more than Billy boy. Maybe the shrivelled-up little shit can move his operations to Ukraine that was once the bread basket of the Caucasus. Lots of opportunity there for the posion peddler. He's live far too long already.

I think the best farmland is under Russian control now. I understand that the most fertile is all in the Donbas.

 

That said, I wouldn't discourage Gates from heading there. I think he should go and check it out. I for one would welcome the news of him being captured by the Russians.

[SoundOfSilence]

47 minutes ago, Mr H said:

Fk me sideways and then backwards

 

Heir Starmer declaring yesterday that the Tories were running an experimental open borders policy....

 

 

Obviously, he feels the experiment was a success ...

[Katsika]

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democracy-dead-coup-against-right-wing-movements-underway-europe?utm_source=daily_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3592

 

Democracy Is Dead: A Coup Against Right Wing Movements Is Underway In Europe

[Grumpy Owl]

On 12/10/2024 at 8:09 AM, Mr H said:

Fk me sideways and then backwards

 

Heir Starmer declaring yesterday that the Tories were running an experimental open borders policy....

 

 

 

 

 

It's just "party politics", each side 'blaming' the other for their own failings.

 

Let us not forget that it was Starmer's predecessor Tony Blair and his 'New Labour' government that started all this off.

 

Open borders with the likes of Pakistan, then European countries like Poland and Romania etc through 'freedom of movement'.

 

The Conservative governments from 2010 to 2024 just continued this. Even after Brexit, while the EU nationals stopped arriving, we continued to accept people from all over the world.

 

I believe the 'net migration' figures have been a smoke-screen for many years. EU migration was never a massive problem, after all at least most EU nationals were coming here to work and earn a living. After Brexit though, we were supposed to "take back control of our borders" but strangely net migration is getting worse, so the question to be asked is "where are these people coming from"?

 

The other interesting question to be asked is "who are the people that are leaving the UK?".

 

 

 

[Mr H]

 

L

 

[Katsika]

4 hours ago, Mr H said:

 

L

 

That made me cry, not only for my ex countrymen but also for the X too many around the world who also don't have warmth.  We have become "Comfortably Numb, just a little pin prick, nod if you can hear me - Pink Floyd the Wall.

[theo102]

If you were curious why Igor Kirillov was just assassinated, watch this video.

In August 2023, Kirillov outlined how the US and Big Pharma “rule the world” by “manufacturing biological crises”.

He also discussed how all of this evidence has been submitted to the UN many times, and gets vetoed every time by the US, because the US cannot refute the documentation.

Essentially, Kirillov found the paper trail proving that the US government, along with NGOs and oligarchs, created C19, and used it to generate trillions in profit for pharmaceutical companies via vaccine production, as well as advancing government overreach via emergency powers.

 

https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/russian-general-assassinated-for-revealing-us-biolabs-in-ukraine/

[Mr H]

The rumours continue

 

 

 

 

[NeoScota]

4 hours ago, Mr H said:

The rumours continue

 

 

 

 

No shit??!!

.....colour me shocked

[1velocity7]

now to feel sorry for him

 

 

 

 

[numnuts]

On 11/27/2024 at 1:17 AM, SoundOfSilence said:

As you know, there is a lot of globalist infighting. I suspect China is not so onboard. China will be happy to impose its social credit system worldwide. But that will be for the benefit of China and not the globalists.

 

It definitely doesn't seem so. I don't know about the dim and distant past, but not for many years now.

 

 

 

On 11/28/2024 at 12:51 PM, 1velocity7 said:

now we know we are fully in clown world

 

 

Cheers, Kim. Meanwhile, I heard that Kaiser Keir is trying to recruit Assad, as his new Prisons Tsar.

Edited December 27, 2024 by numnuts

[numnuts]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cewxrzq0489o

 

'Twenty councillors quit Labour in Starmer protest.'

 

The councillors said they would establish a new independent party, planning to run the borough council as a minority administration in the short-term, but may need support from existing independents in order to keep control. They claimed 10 of them had been blocked from standing for Labour at upcoming local elections for Nottinghamshire County Council after questioning the winter fuel policy.

[numnuts]

It feels like a never-ending nightmare. First and foremost, it has to be pointed out that no council, whether at county, district or parish level, would ever decide to dissolve itself just to save some taxpayer's cash. Even if in a poor financial shape. Over the years, a lot of stooges must have invaded a lot of our county councils. Other than that, no council, whether at county, district or parish level, should be able to dissolve itself in this manner, without a public vote. From what I can gather, though, it seems to be even worse than that. The government seems to be suggesting that county councils can just give the nod on dissolving district councils in their area.

 

It cracks me up that Kaiser Keir is trying to sell all of this as 'devolution' and 'power to the people'. It's the exact opposite of that! And, if he thought it was such a vote winner, then why didn't he mention it in Labour's general election manifesto? Oh, that's right, they only just thought of it, after coming to power. Like, with taking away the winter fuel payment from millions of pensioners. No one should be accepting this in their area, unless it is first voted on by the public. I vote to keep my district council and, if it comes to it, my parish council. Hands off, Starmer!      

 

P.S. The county council elections in May would now be de facto referendums on this matter regardless. No small wonder, under the guise of 'exploring options', that they want to postpone them then. 

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgrg989j9jo

 

'Half of county councils could see election delay.'

 

More than half of the county councils in England with elections scheduled for this year could seek to have the votes postponed, the BBC can reveal. At least 12 out of 21 county councils due to hold elections in May are poised to ask ministers to delay the ballots to explore options set out in a major redesign of local government announced in December. The government has set Friday as the deadline for areas to show interest in the first tranche of devolution plans.

 

But the current plans have prompted a backlash from some local leaders. The District Councils Network claimed ministers had "rushed" the proposals to reorganise local government and were depriving residents of having a say. The organisation's chairman Cllr Sam Chapman-Allen said: "The cancellation of the local elections comes after the government's general election manifesto neglected to mention that it sought to take power away from communities by replacing district councils with mega councils. Democracy is being side-lined with the local electorate being deprived of any democratic opportunity to give their verdict on a major reorganisation that will have far-reaching repercussions for the destiny of thousands of English towns and villages."

Edited January 9 by numnuts

[numnuts]

So, unless she takes evasive action, it now seems that Rachel From Accounts is going to have to break her own rules. Supposedly, all because sterling dropped around 1% in value, which caused 'dem faceless markets' to get 'jittery' and then led to a rise in borrowing costs. OMG. More spending cuts, when it comes to the elderly and vulnerable then. It's all a cheap, pathetic PTB stunt, if you ask me. Grandma Numnuts always used to tell me to beware a woman with a disguised bowl cut and sides. So, what lies behind the disguise then? Yes, just as I suspected. More weak humans need to be taken to task...

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c7454gnqdw8o

 

'Market trouble threatens Labour's economic plans.'

 

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has set out clear fiscal rules, such as getting debt falling as a share of national income by the end of this parliament, and she has made sticking to these rules a crucial test of the government's credibility. That's what makes the recent rise in government borrowing costs potentially so dangerous for Reeves, the Treasury and - arguably - Sir Keir Starmer's entire political project. If the government has to spend a lot more money paying interest on debt, then it is less likely to meet its rules.

 

A Treasury spokesperson said last night that "meeting the fiscal rules is non-negotiable". That would suggest she would have to break her commitment and announce, or at least pave the way for, measures to bring the government in line with its rules. What could that mean? In principle, it could mean either tax rises or spending restraint. In practice, given the announcement of a significant increase in employers' National Insurance rates in October, the government's view is that it would have to mean spending restraint - Darren Jones, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, practically said as much in the Commons today. To be clear, spending restraint would not necessarily mean spending cuts, just much lower spending increases than would otherwise happen. (LOL. That's a good one.)

 

 

Edited January 11 by numnuts

[k_j_evans]

3 hours ago, numnuts said:

So, unless she takes evasive action, it now seems that Rachel From Accounts is going to have to break her own rules. Supposedly, all because sterling dropped around 1% in value, which caused 'dem faceless markets' to get 'jittery' and then led to a rise in borrowing costs. OMG. More spending cuts, when it comes to the elderly and vulnerable then. It's all a cheap, pathetic PTB stunt, if you ask me. Grandma Numnuts always used to tell me to beware a woman with a disguised bowl cut and sides. So, what lies behind the disguise then? Yes, just as I suspected. More weak humans need to be taken to task...

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c7454gnqdw8o

 

'Market trouble threatens Labour's economic plans.'

 

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has set out clear fiscal rules, such as getting debt falling as a share of national income by the end of this parliament, and she has made sticking to these rules a crucial test of the government's credibility. That's what makes the recent rise in government borrowing costs potentially so dangerous for Reeves, the Treasury and - arguably - Sir Keir Starmer's entire political project. If the government has to spend a lot more money paying interest on debt, then it is less likely to meet its rules.

 

A Treasury spokesperson said last night that "meeting the fiscal rules is non-negotiable". That would suggest she would have to break her commitment and announce, or at least pave the way for, measures to bring the government in line with its rules. What could that mean? In principle, it could mean either tax rises or spending restraint. In practice, given the announcement of a significant increase in employers' National Insurance rates in October, the government's view is that it would have to mean spending restraint - Darren Jones, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, practically said as much in the Commons today. To be clear, spending restraint would not necessarily mean spending cuts, just much lower spending increases than would otherwise happen. (LOL. That's a good one.)

 

 

 

Well, if she couoldn't tell that her budget would cause at least a bigger recession, if not a depression, she must be pretty thick...oh, wait.

[lobster]

2 hours ago, k_j_evans said:

Well, if she couoldn't tell that her budget would cause at least a bigger recession, if not a depression, she must be pretty thick...oh, wait.

It not just budgets that cause currency fluctuations,  it's also the credibility of the government to govern, and its PR cockup after cock up at the moment and Elon isn't helping them out any . If the markets loose faith in them entirely,  they will crash the currency and force a change, that's if trump doesn't do for them first

Edited January 12 by lobster

[SoundOfSilence]

1 hour ago, lobster said:

It not just budgets that cause currency fluctuations,  it's also the credibility of the government to govern, and its PR cockup after cock up at the moment and Elon isn't helping them out any . If the markets loose faith in them entirely,  they will crash the currency and force a change, that's if trump doesn't do for them first

Except in this case, it's caused by a strengthening US dollar. Which has risen against all currencies. Not just Sterling.

 

[lobster]

11 hours ago, SoundOfSilence said:

Except in this case, it's caused by a strengthening US dollar. Which has risen against all currencies. Not just Sterling.

 

Sterling has also fallen against the euro

[SoundOfSilence]

6 minutes ago, lobster said:

Sterling has also fallen against the euro

It's commonly quoted in USD. Being the world reserve currency.

 

If you ask for the GBP spot price no one is going to think you mean against the Euro.

 

The reference to the sterling losing 1 percent is against the USD. Caused by the USD appreciating.

[numnuts]

OMG. It's only more 'faceless' turmoil. I don't think there is anyone left, who can't see that 'faces' behind the scenes can/do manipulate such occurrences. I got a plan though. Seize Greenland, before Captain Pubehead gets a chance, then flog it to Thames Water. Should be enough to keep them going, for a few more years at least.

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c897vw5w7p8o

 

'Pound falls further as borrowing costs rise again.'

 

Despite her commitment, some have questioned whether Reeves will be able to achieve the targets without making further cuts or tax rises because of how government debt costs have risen. On Monday, Prime Minister Kaiser Keir doubled-down on the fiscal rule commitment. He also defended Reeves after being asked if she would still be chancellor by the next election. "She has my full confidence. She has the full confidence of the entire party." (No, she does not.)

Edited January 13 by numnuts

[cemeterycrow]

 

Edited January 14 by cemeterycrow

[numnuts]

On 1/11/2025 at 6:56 PM, numnuts said:

So, unless she takes evasive action, it now seems that Rachel From Accounts is going to have to break her own rules. Supposedly, all because sterling dropped around 1% in value, which caused 'dem faceless markets' to get 'jittery' and then led to a rise in borrowing costs. OMG. More spending cuts, when it comes to the elderly and vulnerable then. It's all a cheap, pathetic PTB stunt, if you ask me.

 

16 hours ago, numnuts said:

OMG. It's only more 'faceless' turmoil. I don't think there is anyone left, who can't see that 'faces' behind the scenes can/do manipulate such occurrences.

 

 

It's just all so easy to call out, well in advance, nowadays. Yawn...

 

 

Edited January 14 by numnuts

[cemeterycrow]

Anger over Labour's shameless bid to 'rig' election by easing ID law and allowing millions of foreign nationals to vote

 

Quote

 

Labour's plot to ‘rig’ the next election by meddling with voting laws was last night described as ‘deeply concerning’.

Sir Keir Starmer’s government is proposing to allow millions of foreign nationals to vote and abolish measures to prevent voter fraud.

 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14252551/Labours-shameless-bid-rig-election-easing-ID-law.html

 

Quote

 

Ministers are considering plans to overhaul the way elections are held by scrapping voter ID laws and give five million foreign nationals the right to vote in UK elections.

It has led to accusations that the party is trying to lock in a Labour majority by removing obstacles designed to tackle voter fraud.

The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), a Left-wing think-tank closely aligned with Labour, have said in a recent report that there is a ‘clear need for a wider political conversation about the notion of citizenship and voting rights in the UK.’

 

 

[Anti Facts Sir]

Labour does what Labour does. Never changes.

[numnuts]

I didn't know that the BBC News website now had an 'Indepth' section, where you supposedly have to sign in to read the bullshit. Anyhow, at the time of me making this post, one can just open the link in a private browsing window, which then doesn't make you sign in. Reading between the lines, it is very concerning reading about these secret 'mini-cabinet' meetings.

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyeej4ex5wo

 

'Secret UK 'mini cabinet' tries to plan for unpredictable Trump.'

 

There have been series of secret "mini-cabinet" meetings, with the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, the Chancellor Rachel Reeves, the Foreign Secretary David Lammy, and the Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds "trying to plan for what might come", according to one source. One insider tells me there hasn't been too much preparation for multiple specific scenarios because "you'd drive yourself crazy" trying to guess Trump's next steps. But another source says various papers have been prepared to be presented to the wider Cabinet. (That should probably read 'to be accepted by the wider cabinet'. With no questions asked.)