SoundOfSilence Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 Europe fears Trump may roll back the sanctions on Russia. Europe Rethinks Russia Strategy Over Fears Trump Will Cut Sanctions: Report - Newsweek Proving once and for all that European leaders are dumber than a box of hammers. By abandoning cheap Russian gas Europe has plunged itself into economic crisis. Even Volkswagen has been affected by this. VW labour chief sounds alarm on mass layoffs and three German plant closures | Reuters Of course, restoring cheap Russian energy would signal boomtime for their economies. Instead of embracing this idea, out of touch EU apparatchiks fetishize over renewable energy. Clowns! Renewable energy does not work. It is inefficient and once generated it is incompatible with current electricity grids and, due to the long distances between generation and consumption locations, there is substantial transmission loss. Not much of it ends up going to consumers. None of these sanctions have weakened Russia. It now has a bigger economy then Germany and has weaned itself from dependence on the Western financial system. bne IntelliNews - Russia overtakes Germany to become fifth biggest economy in the world in GDP on a PPP basis What they have succeeded in doing is driving Russia and China together. Something Globalist strategists were keen to avoid. The sensible thing to do would be to end the sanctions. They are only harming the West. Russia has defeated Ukraine. Now it is just a question of how much Ukrainian territory it will end up with. Russia is a BRICs member. It has a large number of trading partners willing to ignore any Western sanctions. China will take the gas Germany doesn't want. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katsika Posted January 11 Author Share Posted January 11 6 hours ago, SoundOfSilence said: I wonder how the West's new best friend, head chopper Abu Mohammad Al-Jolson, will react to this violation? Apparently Abu was seen wearing a neck tie that was tied the English way, leading some to conclude he was as an MI6 asset. (This may have been at the recent event where a German politician’s anticipation of a handshake was replaced with the hand over-heart gesture). 2 hours ago, SoundOfSilence said: What they have succeeded in doing is driving Russia and China together. Something Globalist strategists were keen to avoid. Or could that be deliberate - double bluff kind of thing? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 10 minutes ago, Katsika said: Apparently Abu was seen wearing a neck tie that was tied the English way, leading some to conclude he was as an MI6 asset. Probably. MI6, GCHQ, CIA, 5 eyes. They all work for the same little Satanic cabal and not the governments they purport to represent. 10 minutes ago, Katsika said: (This may have been at the recent event where a German politician’s anticipation of a handshake was replaced with the hand over-heart gesture). It was Annelena Baerbock. But I think she was just trying to count to 360 on her fingers. It was during a TV interview (forget the interviewer or channel), but he was suited up and with his beard all neatly trimmed. Tie in a double Windsor knot. As for head chopping, I don't know where he would get an idea like that. I mean, it's not as if Muhammad (the perfect man whose example is to be followed) beheaded 600 men in a single day. beheaded-600-jews-in-one-day.pdf Perhaps Muhammad Al-Jolson is trying to break his record. Or might be practicing for the next Jihadi Games. 10 minutes ago, Katsika said: Or could that be deliberate - double bluff kind of thing? It could be. Though I can't think why. What would the Globalists hope to achieve by it? And there were a number of Globalists desperately trying to drive a wedge through the Russia/China relationship. Why did you think they might want to drive the two together? Joel Skousen does have a theory on this. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katsika Posted January 11 Author Share Posted January 11 4 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said: Why did you think they might want to drive the two together? Joel Skousen does have a theory on this. In order to take over the world Pinky ( kind of divide, confuse, conquer and rule). (or it could have just been the extra coffee this morning)! I don't know J Skousen - (after Flynn I'll find him - thank you for the extra homework) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lobster Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 8 hours ago, SoundOfSilence said: Megyn Kelly (trained lawyer) weighed in on the Trump business records case. Megyn Exposes the Sham Sentencing of Donald Trump in New York Business Records Case – Megyn Kelly "This was a stupid business records case in which Trump wrote down ‘legal expenses’ for money he gave to a lawyer to make a nasty complainant go away. It sounds like a legal expense to me. " "Mark my words: It is going to be thrown out on appeal." She's absolutely correct. Of interest, Trump was allowed to make oral representations during sentencing including: "They talked about business records and the business records were extremely accurately counted. I had nothing to do with them anyway. That was done by an accountant." One of the elements of the offence is "intent to defraud". This requires knowledge aforethought. Given Trump did not prepare the records, but left it to his accountant, he could not possibly have had the requisite mens rea. His accountant clearly thought the accounting entry accurately reflected the transaction. The fraud would be marking a bribe as a legal expense before handing it to an accountant, or more accurately handing the money to his lawyer to pay the bribe and accepting a receipt in exchange for a service he didnt receive and then giving it to the accountants Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lobster Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 (edited) 11 hours ago, SoundOfSilence said: Really? Yet you have no hesitation when it comes to making up the law and Ukrainian towns. The expertise was the percentage of total Syrian water represented by the water captured by the Al-Mantara Dam. A mathematician could work that out. There are formulae. The article wasn't implying forensic analysts capable of identifying where the water came from by analyzing the molecules. Ever heard of a pipeline? So your saying the experts, were anyone who can work out percentages, that's a funny name for numeracy well within the capabilities of a 10 year old As they havent built a pipeline, the water hasnt been stolen, at least yet, despite using present tense in the passage you posted. Do you have any reliable information they intend to build such a pipe line, or just the usual speculation ? Edited January 11 by lobster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 59 minutes ago, lobster said: So your saying the experts, were anyone who can work out percentages, that's a funny name for numeracy well within the capabilities of a 10 year old Well, Rock, I can see how someone with the capabilities of a 10-year-old would think that. Actually, the problem is a little more complex that just being told there are 100 liters of water in Syria 40 of which are held in the Al-Mantara Dam. First you have to know the volumes of water. Seeing as we are not talking about a swimming pool but a large body of water with a non-uniform shoreline and a non-uniform bottom it becomes a little difficult. I know that you find maps and cartography troubling Rock. But generally, the water bodies need to be surveyed before mathematical formulae are applied in order to estimate the volume. It is a very skilled process. Not only do you have to survey this particular dam but the rest of the Syrian fresh waterways to get the total volume. 59 minutes ago, lobster said: As they havent built a pipeline, the water hasnt been stolen, at least yet, despite using present tense in the passage you posted. Do you have any reliable information they intend to build such a pipe line, or just the usual speculation ? Well, nothing. Other than the fact Israel has a chronic water problem. Israel's Chronic Water Problem But no, you're right. The IDF travelled to about 50km outside of Damascus to occupy a dam because it looked like a nice place to camp. It's not going well for you is it Rock? 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 6 hours ago, Katsika said: In order to take over the world Pinky Somehow, I feel like I'm a character in Pacman. Don't you think global domination might be a little easier if you don't unite two of the three biggest superpowers against you? Say, join Russia beat the Chinese and then turn on Russia. Hitler made the mistake of fighting on two fronts. Though I guess the New World Order do share the same ideology and heritage so perhaps they just cannot help themselves. 6 hours ago, Katsika said: ( kind of divide, confuse, conquer and rule). (or it could have just been the extra coffee this morning)! Perhaps get decaf next time you're shopping? 6 hours ago, Katsika said: I don't know J Skousen - (after Flynn I'll find him - thank you for the extra homework) Just kidding. Joel Skousen is of the opinion that China and Russia will unite against the US (Globalist plan). This was the insanity of Obama. He though the US could absorb a first strike and he could use the chaos to invoke the emergency powers and quell the US population. Meanwhile Russia and China would turn on each other with China coming out on top. Obviously, he goes into more detail than a couple of sentences. But at least you're not alone. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 11 hours ago, lobster said: The fraud would be marking a bribe as a legal expense before handing it to an accountant, or more accurately handing the money to his lawyer to pay the bribe and accepting a receipt in exchange for a service he didnt receive and then giving it to the accountants There was no bribe, Rock. Settling potential lawsuits is perfectly legitimate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lobster Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 11 hours ago, SoundOfSilence said: There was no bribe, Rock. Settling potential lawsuits is perfectly legitimate. Paying a sum of money to keep your mouth shut is a bribe, that's very different than there being a lawsuit and making a settlement out of court What are you suggesting the lawsuit was about ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 10 minutes ago, lobster said: Paying a sum of money to keep your mouth shut is a bribe, No, it isn't. A bribe is a payment to a public official to get them to do something that they wouldn't otherwise do. 10 minutes ago, lobster said: What are you suggesting the lawsuit was about ? I didn't. I said potential lawsuit. I wasn't at the negotiations, so I have no idea what her allegations were. But blackmailers have to be subtle Rock. You can't just blunder in framing it in a way that could expose you to prosecution. You need to dress it up a bit. Put it in the context of a potentially damaging lawsuit. I am suing you for X, which will lead to Y becoming public knowledge. Though I am prepared to accept that Stormy Daniels went to you for advice and went on record in a way to incriminate herself. In which case entering into an NDA is still not illegal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lobster Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Just now, SoundOfSilence said: No, it isn't. A bribe is a payment to a public official to get them to do something that they wouldn't otherwise do. I didn't. I said potential lawsuit. I wasn't at the negotiations, so I have no idea what her allegations were. But blackmailers have to be subtle Rock. You can't just blunder in framing it in a way that could expose you to prosecution. You need to dress it up a bit. Put it in the context of a potentially damaging lawsuit. I am suing you for X, which will lead to Y becoming public knowledge. Though I am prepared to accept that Stormy Daniels went to you for advice and went on record in a way to incriminate herself. In which case entering into an NDA is still not illegal. What ? Are you saying only public officials can be " bribed" I dont think that's correct ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 3 minutes ago, lobster said: What ? Are you saying only public officials can be " bribed" I dont think that's correct ! Legally it is. But check if you wish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lobster Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 11 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said: Legally it is. But check if you wish. I have and it isn't restricted to public officials Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 4 minutes ago, lobster said: I have and it isn't restricted to public officials Evidence please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lobster Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Just now, SoundOfSilence said: Evidence please? To told me to check and I did, it's your statement you provided evidence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 3 minutes ago, lobster said: To told me to check and I did, it's your statement you provided evidence I suspected that would be your response. I think we're done with this topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 Further to my previous posts regarding the Middle East peace process it seems that Trump is putting pressure on both Israel and Palestine to exchange hostages for a ceasefire. Isreal gets its hostages, and Hamas gets back a lot more of its hostages, illegally held by Israel. It seems Netanyahu is being pressured to accept and Hamas seems open to he idea. There are a number of reports on this, I just grabbed the first one that popped up on my search engine. Trump Team Pushes For Gaza Hostage Release, Ceasefire Deal In Israel So further to my previous comment, about Trump doubling down on stupid regarding hell to pay in Gaza, it would seem that, instead, his actual motive is to gain a similar legacy to Ronald Reagan. When Reagan came to power Iran immediately released all of the American hostages it had held under Carter. Cementing Reagan's reputation as a hard man. I am sure trump wants a similar legacy. That he frightened Hamas into releasing their hostages etc. But the reluctant party all along has been Netanyahu. Not Hamas. The reposted Jeffrey Sachs comments may well be a part of Trump's strategy. To say to Netanyahu if you don't sort this mess out, you're on your own. But other pressure on Israel is the growing tensions with Turkey over Israel stealing the parts of Syria that Turkey wanted to steal. Overextended and bogged down in Gaza, Israel may welcome an exit. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1velocity7 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 James O'Keefe has done it again. Another undercover video. BREAKING VIDEO: Top Pentagon Advisor Reveals On Hidden Camera Conversation “with a Couple of Retired Generals to Explore What We Can Do” to ‘Protect People from Trump’ – O'Keefe Media Group "In a recent undercover revelation, Jamie Mannina, a Pentagon advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and former FBI Special Agent, revealed strategies and covert meetings aimed at influencing public perception and undermining the presidency of Donald Trump." A.K.A. a coup d'etat. "Mannina acknowledged collaborating with retired military leaders, including generals and admirals, to devise methods to counteract Trump’s administration. “I’ve been in conversation with a couple of retired generals to explore what we can do,” he admitted during the undercover conversation. These discussions reportedly occurred in high-security environments, including “The Tank,” a secure room within the Pentagon reserved for critical defense deliberations." Yep, definitely a coup. "As a “ghostwriter,” he contributed to over 100 op-eds intended to sway public opinion against Trump’s potential re-election. “We tried to explain to the American people the national security consequences of another Trump presidency,” You mean Operation Mockingbird's true? I had no idea. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 I just saw a snippet from Pam Bondi's confirmation hearing. I forget who was the questioner. She was asked about Q-Anon. She said she had heard of it. The questioner then informed her that one of the Q-Anon's conspiracy theories is that there is a cabal of Satanic pedophiles, who murder and drink the blood of children, running Washington DC. You mean there isn't? I didn't quite catch it but apparently there is a link to Kash Patel. I think he seemed to agree with the statement (allegedly). The interesting thing is his confirmation hearing is coming up. It will be interesting to see if he is asked about this. Of course, he will have to dodge the question since there is no way he'll get confirmed if he openly starts calling out DC pedophiles. Especially if he points out a few at his hearing. But it could be a fun hearing. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Following the Pentagon's meeting to discuss a coup d'etat against Trump Jake Sullivan said the quiet part out loud. Really Jake? What event could that be? What aren't you telling us? It seems General Flynn noticed as well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1velocity7 Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 58 minutes ago, 1velocity7 said: Well, at least Q-Anon got one thing correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundOfSilence Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 As the rift between the US and Israel grows, I'm liking Trump more and more. It should have happened years ago (well at least one). But better late than never. I guess Trump didn't want to be associated with a genocide while in office. Did Trump envoy Steve Witkoff push Netanyahu into accepting Gaza ceasefire deal? – Firstpost Uh, duh! How Trump Scared Netanyahu Into Accepting a Cease-fire Deal With Hamas - Israel News - Haaretz.com "Cynical, unwilling, fearful: Benjamin Netanyahu, who rejected this same hostage deal when the Biden administration proposed it months ago, has now been bulldozed into wide-ranging concessions." Apparently, Trump's envoy, who is a businessman and not a diplomat (just as well) used some colorful language in forcing the deal down Netanyahu's throat. Apparently, when he flew in Netanyahu gave his apology because he was observing some Jewish religious pantomime. Steve Witkoff conveyed the view that he wasn't very sympathetic to Netanyahu's fake religious observance and that Netanyahu had better meet pronto. This may be where the colorful language came in. It seems Netanyahu was quite shocked at being treated like this. Nevertheless, it seemed to have motivated him to curtail his religious observance and proceed to the meeting with Witkoff at all speed. I can only guess at the rest, but I suspect when Netanyahu finally caught up with Witkoff it was conveyed to him in no uncertain terms, sign the deal or you're on your own. Why do I think this? Because it is the same deal that Netanyahu has repeatedly rejected. So, Trump's idiotic threats of all hell breaking lose in the Middel East if the hostages weren't released were just Trump desiring a Reagan moment. He knew the deal was done. Hamas were onboard and he knew he could bully Netanyahu. Therefore, he could pretend to be a strong man. Happy to give him the win if it means peace. Of course, Biden is trying to get credit. That really just needs to be underlined, and we can move on. It requires no rebuttal from me. There were a lot of Muslim voters in areas such as Michigan who favored Trump over Biden. Helping to secure his victory. I'm glad to see their optimism was repaid. What I would love to see. Which is never going to happen unfortunately. Is to have the US cancel aid to Israel and use the moneys to rebuild Palestine. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.