Southport - Seven young girls (children) stabbed by teenager - subsequent protests and riots across UK

[Sportsfan28]

On 2/26/2025 at 2:07 AM, Observations said:

I would have liked to record her interview on breakfast news.
 

This is the lady who arranged the class, and was on the front pages; back then she reminded me of Meghan somehow? 

 

In this interview she seemed to have no make up so looked a bit different?  

 

‘They’ keep saying the class soon became fully booked. I suppose cause Taylor Swift is SO popular. ‘They’ also keep showing those little friendship bracelets. 
 

Leanne Lucas seems to have a link to a children's yoga company called YogaBeez. I just find this strange, regarding the bee symbolism. We had all the bee stuff with the fake Manchester attack and the children at YogaBeez are described as "honey beez". Maybe I'm reading to much into it but the bee symbolism in my opinion could be significant in some way. And yes, I thought she looked very different in the interview as well!

Enlightened YogaBeez Success Story - Children's Yoga Teacher Training | Teach yoga to Children | YogaBeez

[Fluke]

 

[Nemuri Kyoshiro]

On 2/27/2025 at 2:00 PM, Sportsfan28 said:

Maybe I'm reading to much into it but the bee symbolism in my opinion could be significant in some way. And yes, I thought she looked very different in the interview as well!

I don't know but if you've ever been to Rome and had the chance to look at the work of Bernini, and you'll see bees. From what I can remember, he was commissioned by the Barberini family - of which Pope Urban VIII was a prominent member - to sculpt many works. The family coat of arms has three bees on it so Bernini was told to incorporate them in his works. Sometimes, a small carved bee will be hidden away, sometimes, as in the Fountain of the Bees, they are prominent.

[Sportsfan28]

On 3/19/2025 at 6:24 PM, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

I don't know but if you've ever been to Rome and had the chance to look at the work of Bernini, and you'll see bees. From what I can remember, he was commissioned by the Barberini family - of which Pope Urban VIII was a prominent member - to sculpt many works. The family coat of arms has three bees on it so Bernini was told to incorporate them in his works. Sometimes, a small carved bee will be hidden away, sometimes, as in the Fountain of the Bees, they are prominent.

I didn't know about Bernini, thanks for that, very interesting. The bee symbolism was also with Artemis, the goddess known as the queen bee who was also Diana. And don't forget the honeymoon, the mixture of menstrual blood and honey that would be drunk before the wedding. With Southport you've got bee symbolism and the trinity of victims, just like the trinity of victims in the Nottingham attacks which were also very dubious. (The Barberini family coat of arms = three bees, more trinity symbolism?) 

[cemeterycrow]

The stark naked briefs thread detailing journalist Charlie Astor -Bentleys censorship and removal of information during the southport killers trial.

Detailing allegations of Rudakabanas obsession with violence including white genocide.

 

 

Edited March 26 by cemeterycrow

[Grumpy Owl]

Its worth remembering that at the time, the news was all about 'rumours of far-right violence' in Birmingham.

 

Man jailed for 'leading and encouraging' disorder

Quote

A man has been jailed for "leading and encouraging" violent disorder in the West Midlands in the wake of the Southport stabbings last year.

Adam Said was part of a large group which gathered in Bordesley Green on 5 August, with pockets of disturbances spreading to other parts of the city in the evening, police said.

The 19-year-old, of Washwood Heath Road, was found to be encouraging violence, as he drove around the city in a black Range Rover, said West Midlands Police.

At Birmingham Crown Court earlier he was sentenced to two years and four months in prison after pleading guilty to violent disorder.

During the incidents a Skoda car was smashed before a man was assaulted outside a pub in Stoney Lane.

from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckg7423ex27o

 

Number of "far-right protestors" jailed in Birmingham for causing violent disorder still remains at zero.

 

On the contrary, while the 'rumoured' far-right protests never happened, some other 'factions' still saw a good excuse to go and 'let off some steam'.

[Bombadil]

On 3/16/2025 at 9:28 PM, Fluke said:

 

Don’t normally have time to watch many videos. Credit to this girl. Seriously intelligent and diligent. The last minute or so when she describes the level of barbarity is way beyond what I envisioned. None of the survivors or families etc will ever get over this. Truly brutal.

[Occulus5]

Miles Mathis wrote an article about the Southport stabbings being a hoax, and also the Lucy Connolly alleged arrest. Why is noone on here even suggesting this was a hoax?. I don't agree with everyone that is said though. He says at one point:

 

"Merseyside Police imposed an Emergency Restriction of Flying to stop aircraft – including helicopters and drones – from flying without permission. I'm sorry, what? Local police don't have that authority, only MI5 would be doing something like that, and why would they? The one kid was already in custody, so what does that have to do with air traffic? Did they think this was part of some general Air Blitz on Southport from Rwanda?"

 

https://mileswmathis.com/lucie.pdf

Edited May 29 by Occulus5

[1velocity7]

4 hours ago, Occulus5 said:

Miles Mathis wrote an article about the Southport stabbings being a hoax, and also the Lucy Connolly alleged arrest.

i saw this thumbnail the other day andyour post reminded me of it

 

 

[Grumpy Owl]

On 5/23/2025 at 8:20 PM, Grumpy Owl said:

Its worth remembering that at the time, the news was all about 'rumours of far-right violence' in Birmingham.

 

Man jailed for 'leading and encouraging' disorder

from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckg7423ex27o

 

Number of "far-right protestors" jailed in Birmingham for causing violent disorder still remains at zero.

 

On the contrary, while the 'rumoured' far-right protests never happened, some other 'factions' still saw a good excuse to go and 'let off some steam'.

 

Meet the four young men jailed over race-fuelled carnage on Birmingham streets

Quote

A handful of men have now been jailed for their involvement in wild violence in Birmingham during race-related civil unrest last summer.

Bordesley Green witnessed chaotic scenes on August 5 last year after hundreds of people gathered to counter a rumoured EDL protest, which ultimately never materialised.

There was bedlam on the roads, particularly around McDonald's on Belcher's Lane, before masses of people moved towards Yardley, where some laid siege to The Clumsy Swan pub, wrongly believing far-right activists were inside.

It was one of many incidents around the country sparked by the tragic child murders in Southport.

At the time, false information circulated online about the nationality, religion and immigration status of the attacker, Alex Rudakubana, who was later jailed for 52 years.

Things quickly snowballed, leading to clashes between far-right activists and those who opposed them.

In the ensuing months, judges have sent the clear message that anyone who simply used the situation as an excuse for violence would be severely punished and sentenced to immediate imprisonment

from: https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/meet-four-young-men-jailed-31712330

 

Once again, here in Birmingham, there was NO 'EDL protest' (which was unlikely as the organisation disbanded several years ago).

 

Despite the 'rumours', you can't 'clash' with far-right activists, if there aren't any out 'protesting'. 

 

So clearly there were some factions 'using the situation as an excuse for violence'. But on this occasion it wasn't any 'knuckle-dragging racist far-right Tommy Robinson supporting thugs' as the media would like you to believe.

 

In fact the 'race-fuelled carnage' click-bait headline actually tells a different story! 

[numnuts]

On 5/29/2025 at 9:51 PM, 1velocity7 said:

i saw this thumbnail the other day andyour post reminded me of it

 

 

I am quite wary of Sonia Poulton.

[numnuts]

This BBC news article is from a few weeks ago. I meant to post it on this thread at the time, but I have been very busy of late. I had to laugh, when I saw that Sajid Javid is going to be co-leading this new taskforce. That's the muppet who was begging so-called 'influencers' on Youtube to promote the 'Covid' vaccines. I wonder, given the tens of thousands of 'Covid' vaccine injuries that no one even bothers trying to dispute any more, whether Saj might now like to offer a different opinion on how 'extremely safe' he once claimed they were? Hmm. That's also the muppet who apparently took a 98% pay cut, in order to leave his banking career and enter the political world, with the sole purpose of 'serving the people'. It looks like he is going to be a busy fellow, as he was also due to take the role of Chairman of the 'Holocaust Memorial Day Trust' this month. Cheers, Saj.

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sajid_Javid

 

'He was appointed Knight Bachelor in the 2024 New Year Honours for political and public service. On 18 September 2024, the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust announced the appointment of Sir Sajid Javid as their next Chair. He is expected to take up the position in July 2025.'

 

'He left Deutsche Bank in 2009 to pursue a career in politics. His earnings at Deutsche Bank would have been roughly £3 million a year at the time he left and the Evening Standard once estimated his career change would have required him to take a 98% pay cut.'

 

'Javid was advised by officials not to visit the Western Wall during a visit to Israel in 2019 because of "long-standing policy of over two-decades". In January 2020, at the reception of Conservative Friends of Israel, he told the audience that his response was – "You know what? I told them to 'get stuffed' and I went anyway".'

 

'Javid has been a regular attendee and speaker at the annual conference of the US neoconservative thinktank American Enterprise Institute, whose members include Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz and John Bolton. Javid has consistently supported foreign military intervention, having voted for intervening in Gaddafi's Libya, as well as air strikes in Iraq and Syria.' (Good to know that we are in safe hands.)

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyegwv15vpo

 

'Taskforce launched to tackle root causes of UK riots.'

 

An independent commission aimed at tackling community divisions across Britain in the aftermath of last summer's riots will hold its first meeting on Wednesday. The cross-party body, led by former Tory home secretary Sir Sajid Javid and Labour MP Jon Cruddas, says it will examine what Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer last year called the "cracks in our foundation" and has support from across the political spectrum. (The Westminster 'Friends Of Genocide'?)

 

Former Green Party leader Caroline Lucas, ex-Tory mayor of the West Midlands Sir Andy Street, and former counter-extremism tsar Dame Sara Khan are also among its members. The Independent Commission on Community and Cohesion, external was announced after the summer riots last year which hit parts of the country last year following the Southport stabbings. False information spread on social media about the identity of the attacker, later found to be 18-year-old Axel Rudakubana, was widely seen as playing a role in fuelling the unrest. (Good to see Caroline 'Spookus' Lucas firing on all cylinders again.) 

 

It is being facilitated by the Together Coalition founded by Brendan Cox, the husband of the Labour MP Jo Cox who was murdered by a far-right extremist. Although not officially government-sponsored, the commission is being supported by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. A spokesperson for the department said: "We are supportive of the work that the Together Coalition is undertaking, and we look forward to following the commission's progress". (Yeah, I bet they are.)

 

Edited July 22 by numnuts

[numnuts]

So, if one were to take this BBC news article at face value, then one would think that a simple amendment to the existing law would be more than enough to tackle the so-called 'non-ideological loophole' that has been highlighted. However, just from the title of the news article itself, without even needing to scrutinise much that is implicit within the article, you can bet your bottom dollar that all of this is solely motivated by the desire to gain more power to target those who have taken no steps to attack anyone or anything. Indeed, going even further than that, those who have zero intention of ever attacking anyone or anything and who would never attack anyone or anything. Tackling the 'non-ideological loophole' is just being used as a cover to usher in more police state apparatus. We all knew it was going to be attempted. 

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9w14yjw8x0o

 

'New criminal offence to target violence-obsessed suspects earlier.' ('Earlier' being the operative word here.)

 

A powerful new criminal offence to target suspects who are found to be preparing mass killings will ensure their plotting is taken as seriously as terrorism, the home secretary says. Yvette Cooper said the criminal justice system had to be given new tools to respond to violence-fixated individuals who are not motivated by a particular ideology, in the wake of the Southport attack last year.

 

Cooper told the BBC that the government will "close the gap" between such offenders and lone, violence-obsessed individuals by giving police the power to apprehend them long before they can act. (What's with this 'long before they can act' bit? They are either plotting or they are not plotting. End of.) 

 

Cooper said: "We've seen cases of growing numbers of teenagers potentially radicalising themselves online and seeing all kinds of extremist material online in their bedrooms. They're seeing a really distorted and warped online world. We have to make sure that that the systems can respond while not taking our eye off the ball of the more long-standing ideological threats." (No need for a new law then. Just simply amend the existing law.)

[numnuts]

13 hours ago, numnuts said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9w14yjw8x0o

 

'New criminal offence to target violence-obsessed suspects earlier.' ('Earlier' being the operative word here.)

 

Cooper told the BBC that the government will "close the gap" between such offenders and lone, violence-obsessed individuals by giving police the power to apprehend them long before they can act. (What's with this 'long before they can act' bit? They are either plotting or they are not plotting. End of.)

 

And, note Cooper's use of the word 'apprehend'. Not 'monitor' or 'intervene', but 'apprehend'. When taken with the 'long before' they can act bit, not just 'before' they can act, then that is seriously concerning. They will seek to create some really vague, new definition of 'violence-obsessed', then seek to somehow apply it to anyone they don't like and then seek to cart them off on the pretext that they 'might' one day commit a non-ideological atrocity. No reason or logic needed here. It 'might' just happen! That's pretty much about it and it is looming on the horizon.     

 

P.S. I don't know. Maybe someone might report you for walking round your garden 'aggressively'.  

Edited July 23 by numnuts

[k_j_evans]

4 hours ago, numnuts said:

 

And, note Cooper's use of the word 'apprehend'. Not 'monitor' or 'intervene', but 'apprehend'. When taken with the 'long before' they can act bit, not just 'before' they can act, then that is seriously concerning. They will seek to create some really vague, new definition of 'violence-obsessed', then seek to somehow apply it to anyone they don't like and then seek to cart them off on the pretext that they 'might' one day commit a non-ideological atrocity. No reason or logic needed here. It 'might' just happen! That's pretty much about it and it is looming on the horizon.     

 

P.S. I don't know. Maybe someone might report you for walking round your garden 'aggressively'.  

Minority report...

[cosmicinaudio]

I have a feeling the Pakistanis who attacked the female police officers at Manchester airport will be found not guilty and walk free. The cabal want riots/race war and a travesty of justice like that would certainly see it happen I think.

[Mr H]

10 minutes ago, cosmicinaudio said:

I have a feeling the Pakistanis who attacked the female police officers at Manchester airport will be found not guilty and walk free. The cabal want riots/race war and a travesty of justice like that would certainly see it happen I think.

Yip blatantly stirring it up in right wing quarters.

 

Don't fool for the bullshit...

[Campion]

4 hours ago, cosmicinaudio said:

I have a feeling the Pakistanis who attacked the female police officers at Manchester airport will be found not guilty and walk free. The cabal want riots/race war and a travesty of justice like that would certainly see it happen I think.

 

At the very least they'll get less jail time than anyone (white) who posts the wrong things about it on social media. 

[cemeterycrow]

Suspended Labour councillor cleared over call to cut far-right protesters’ throats

 

Quote

A suspended Labour councillor has been found not guilty of encouraging violent disorder after he called for far-right protesters’ throats to be cut.

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/ricky-jones-trial-labour-councillor-cut-throats-far-right-b2808329.html

 

Quote

Jones, who said he was on the left of the Labour Party, said the riots had made him feel “upset” and “angry”.

 

A clear example of the two tier policing and justice system they claim does not exist.

 

You can call for the throats of people you disagree with to be cut live on video for all to see and walk free whereas a hastily written and deleted tweet on social media will see you rotting in prison for over a year.

 

Quote

He told the trial his comment did not refer to far-right protesters involved in the riots at the time, but to those who had reportedly left National Front stickers on a train with razor blades hidden behind them.

 

Of course this is total nonsense, it doesn't matter who he is referring to, if he was white and not part of the political establishment he would be in prison now.

Edited August 15 by cemeterycrow

[Mitochondrial Eve]

6 hours ago, cemeterycrow said:

Suspended Labour councillor cleared over call to cut far-right protesters’ throats

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/ricky-jones-trial-labour-councillor-cut-throats-far-right-b2808329.html

 

A clear example of the two tier policing and justice system they claim does not exist.

 

You can call for the throats of people you disagree with to be cut live on video for all to see and walk free whereas a hastily written and deleted tweet on social media will see you rotting in prison for over a year.

 

Of course this is total nonsense, it doesn't matter who he is referring to, if he was white and not part of the political establishment he would be in prison now.

 

As I have previously said on the forum, I have reservations about BlackBeltBarrister / Daniel Shen-Smith. However, he is reliable when it comes to explaining the proper legal position and has done so in the video below.

 

Whilst I wouldn't necessarily disagree that two-tier justice is evident when comparing Ricky Jones and Lucy Connolly, the crimes they were charged with were different.

• Ricky Jones was charged under section 44 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 for "intentionally encouraging or assisting an offence" of violent disorder.
• Lucy Connolly was convicted, after pleading guilty, under section 19 of the Public Order Act 1986 for publishing written material likely to stir up racial hatred.

Jones's charge required an intention for violent disorder to take place - in his defence, he said this wasn't his intention which was accepted hence his acquittal. In comparison, Connolly could be found guilty whether or not she had an intention to stir up racial hatred which is probably why, if we are to accept the case at face value, she pleaded guilty in the hope of receiving less harsh sentencing.

 

Essentially, it was the racial element involved in the (supposed) crime committed which made it harder for Connolly to defend her actions. As you say it could be considered that, because she is white and therefore more likely "racist" in the eyes of the law, she received a less sympathetic hearing and outcome. Perhaps it is not so much the treatment of the individual cases which is two-tier but the law itself which leans towards harsher treatment whenever racism is allegedly involved.

 

Another way in which Connolly was treated more harshly than Jones was by having bail denied. Bail is usually granted as the default position and seemingly none of the reasons for denying it were obvious in Connolly's case.

 

This may seem perverse to some, but I think it was the right decision to let Jones go free today. Just because Connolly's conviction and sentencing is unfair, I wouldn't support what I feel would be another unfair verdict (even if the event itself was staged) - we can all say ill-advised things and I would rather err on the side of letting people do that rather than locking them away. Rather than pushing for harsher sentencing for Jones, I think the emphasis should be on lighter treatment for people such as Connolly. Otherwise I think we are walking into a trap created by those who want to censor and monitor us.

 

I suspect the Lucy Connolly case to be a psy-op intended to inflame racial tensions in the UK. She is a wife of a councillor and I think I recall reading that her social media presence only started to ramp up out of nowhere a few months before last year's riots. Add Ricky Jones into the mix as another strand to the psy-op and cue the fall-out.

 

 

[Saved]

5 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

As I have previously said on the forum, I have reservations about BlackBeltBarrister / Daniel Shen-Smith. However, he is reliable when it comes to explaining the proper legal position and has done so in the video below.

 

Whilst I wouldn't necessarily disagree that two-tier justice is evident when comparing Ricky Jones and Lucy Connolly, the crimes they were charged with were different.

• Ricky Jones was charged under section 44 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 for "intentionally encouraging or assisting an offence" of violent disorder.
• Lucy Connolly was convicted, after pleading guilty, under section 19 of the Public Order Act 1986 for publishing written material likely to stir up racial hatred.

Jones's charge required an intention for violent disorder to take place - in his defence, he said this wasn't his intention which was accepted hence his acquittal. In comparison, Connolly could be found guilty whether or not she had an intention to stir up racial hatred which is probably why, if we are to accept the case at face value, she pleaded guilty in the hope of receiving less harsh sentencing.

 

Essentially, it was the racial element involved in the (supposed) crime committed which made it harder for Connolly to defend her actions. As you say it could be considered that, because she is white and therefore more likely "racist" in the eyes of the law, she received a less sympathetic hearing and outcome. Perhaps it is not so much the treatment of the individual cases which is two-tier but the law itself which leans towards harsher treatment whenever racism is allegedly involved.

 

Another way in which Connolly was treated more harshly than Jones was by having bail denied. Bail is usually granted as the default position and seemingly none of the reasons for denying it were obvious in Connolly's case.

 

This may seem perverse to some, but I think it was the right decision to let Jones go free today. Just because Connolly's conviction and sentencing is unfair, I wouldn't support what I feel would be another unfair verdict (even if the event itself was staged) - we can all say ill-advised things and I would rather err on the side of letting people do that rather than locking them away. Rather than pushing for harsher sentencing for Jones, I think the emphasis should be on lighter treatment for people such as Connolly. Otherwise I think we are walking into a trap created by those who want to censor and monitor us.

 

I suspect the Lucy Connolly case to be a psy-op intended to inflame racial tensions in the UK. She is a wife of a councillor and I think I recall reading that her social media presence only started to ramp up out of nowhere a few months before last year's riots. Add Ricky Jones into the mix as another strand to the psy-op and cue the fall-out.

 

 

I smelt a Psyop with her case and subsequent jailing. I sense the same with Tommy Robinson.

[Mazthehobo]

14 hours ago, Saved said:

I smelt a Psyop with her case and subsequent jailing. I sense the same with Tommy Robinson.

What’s interesting is how not one single politician from around the world gathered together with a sign saying…

”Je Suis Lucy Connolly!”

 

We had only this week a politician getting away with it regarding him suggesting the fascists ‘need their throats cut’.

 

We have hundreds of people arrested for holding a sign ‘Palestine Action’.

 

There is footage of someone in the Nuneaton protests (when asked what should happen to the ‘illegal inmigrants’) suggesting they be shot on sight.

 

You only have to look at David Icke and others to see how it’s one rule for some and another for the tyrants.

 

Justice seems to be a well orchestrated, pre meditated agenda driven pantomime to suit whatever narrative the puppet masters want to perform. 
 

 

 

[Fluke]

8 hours ago, Mazthehobo said:

What’s interesting is how not one single politician from around the world gathered together with a sign saying…

”Je Suis Lucy Connolly!”

 

Is it really interesting though? Or just predictable? 

[Mazthehobo]

2 hours ago, Fluke said:

Is it really interesting though? Or just predictable? 

Well, it’s interesting how predictable something can be that the majority choose not to see.

[Mr H]

7 minutes ago, Mazthehobo said:

Well, it’s interesting how predictable something can be that the majority choose not to see.

Fuck the majority......