DannyUK Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 (edited) On 2/2/2025 at 11:37 AM, Observations said: Further to my post above How to control ‘us’ and infiltrate our language, one step at a time ITV mini feature on a youth club; “ I definitely feel like this is my safe space “ Create the “Safe Space”, make a political front out of it - PR Spin. Then make it most definitely dangerous. “This was supposed to be a safe space”. Aiding political spin of outrage, something must be done… Attack it or even suggest it was a place to recruit suggestible people into terrorism, extremism by preachers of hate whom say… didn’t want to be injected with an experimental “V” numerous times, end up living within a digital concentration camp under a technological surveillance state automated by A.I. and anyone operating the controls behind the facade, where rights and freedoms are surrendered for “safety” to apparently prevent terrorism, crime or the spread of a virus that doesn’t exist… If the lie is understood and true about the virus and you can see very well how the same string pullers and the likes of this tactic is being used and exploited. The same people should be able to see exactly the same is being achieved through crime, terrorism and the war on “conspiracy theorists”. But instead, we see many of them have drank from this poisoned chalice when it comes to these knife crimes used to spin political rhetoric demanding “something must be done”… Many of these people would know full well the deception if they could see they were demanding for mass vaccination. But instead, they’re demanding a mass social surveillance system, first through immigrants and criminals but then everyone. Yet, I really don’t believe many of them know or see this is the whole problem and that they have engaged through a staged PSYOP event to vocalise their political concerns because they’ve been allowed to do so. This is so they can be controlled and condemned by the same crowd they believe they’re speaking out against. It’s a trap. This maybe of interest… IT Glitch - Mainstream Banks Down? - Contact Food Banks? Further on from some the interconnections above for anyone interested and can see the relevance… Bad Boys - Angel's wings “A Skylark wounded in the wing A Cherubim does cease to sing The Game Cock clipd & armd for fight Does the Rising Sun affright Every Wolfs & Lions howl Raises from Hell a Human Soul The wild deer, wandring here & there Keeps the Human Soul from Care” William Blake, Auguries of Innocence Leave The World Behind | Exclusive Clip | Netflix “In NASA we TRUST” - AZAZEL Evil Spirit of the Wilderness - OBEY NASA…  Since “The Hunter Became the Hunted” he can no longer Hunt… Maybe the moral of the story is, he never should have hunted the deer in the first place, thus “keeping his soul from care…” The Deer Hunter - Michael can no longer hunt Psychological Warfare… Quote “During the Vietnam War, the ace of spades was used as a tool of psychological warfare as it was common practice by US soldiers to leave the ace card on the bodies of killed Vietnamese.” See also… ”FEAR” The Thin White Line S1E14 44:50 Millennium TV Series Season One (1996) https://archive.org/details/millennium-season-one-1996/14_The+Thin+White+Line.mkv D.C. Sniper Wire in the Blood - “Transhumanism” Nothing but the Night - S3E3 Synchronicity - S3E4 I'm sure I have posted on the above Wire in the Blood somewhere in full but can't find it atm... Queen of Cups Tarot - Number 13 - Thirteen - XIII Bee Gees - How Deep is Your Love Lyrics “This is a people hunting hat…” as stated…>> Catcher in the Rye… Right - “Jack the Ripper” Through such an event the attempt - “WE ARE ALL BEING TURNED INTO THE CATCHER IN THE RYE” - Triggered - It’s a state of mass hypnosis or mass Trauma Based Mind Control Even if a more limited, less direct fashion “Why So Serious?” - “What we need is a technological safety net” Mind the Edge… Or the Edge of Mind? Harlequin (1980) Trailer | Robert Powell | David Hemmings  Iron Man - Moon Child - Transhumanism… Breaking the chain, karmic wheel of life cause and effect - ironically… My name is LEGION !  The Golem: How He Came into the World Summoning Astaroth („Der Golem”, 1920)  Pinocchio Meets the Death Spirit for the First Time | Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio “Motherland” - Twisting Mother Nature for the Birth of Abominations… The Living Dead - Satans Footsoldiers… Military drugs: creating the supersoldier - Searching for the Truth Edited February 4 by DannyUK 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sportsfan28 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Why are the news now saying they can't legally name Bebe King's parents due to legal reasons? They have been named previously since the beginning of the Southport attack and their picture with Bebe and her sister Genie was used throughout the media. Every other parent is still being named, so I don't understand why Bebe King's parents suddenly can't be named anymore? Maybe I've missed the reason so if anyone knows I would appreciate it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Overheard on the news … Calling for a public enquiry Lessons will be learned Why did the sentencing need to be broadcast to the nation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 32 minutes ago, Observations said: Why did the sentencing need to be broadcast to the nation Because it's all part of the psy-op, trauma inducing, experience. No point carrying it out if you lose the final pay-off scenes. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 (edited) Strangely for the Times this particular article is not behind a paywall …?! https://www.thetimes.com/uk/society/article/southport-attack-victims-parents-honour-daughters-c33rpp8s3 “We meet in a hotel on Lord Street in Southport and are sitting at a round table in a conference room. They have just left a meeting with Sir Keir Starmer in the week that a damning report was published on missed chances by counterterrorism police to stop the attacker.” Edited February 9 by Observations Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr H Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 32 minutes ago, Observations said: Strangely for the Times this particular article is not behind a paywall …?! Just an fyi. You can get past any paywall news site. By, when it's first loading up the page, if you time it right, you go to 3 dots on top right of screen, and press the X button it forces the page to pause before the paywall notification comes up 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Liverpool Echo; “The families will appear in a television interview on Good Morning Britain on Monday” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 BBC; “None of the parents have been able to return to work since the stabbings, the Sunday Times reported.” “Elsie's parents have set up a charity, Elsie's Story, to help children in need.” “Bebe's parents said they would try to live as full a life as they could for their daughter.” “Her mother said: She was the most positive, bubbliest girl and we have to honour that.” "We have to live for Bebe. And honour her. And find light in the dark." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 https://news.sky.com/story/southport-murders-axel-rudakubana-sentencing-live-latest-dance-class-child-killer-13288242 Alice's parents: 'Our dream girl was taken... It shattered our souls' They say their world was "shattered and turned upside down". "Our life went with her. He took us too," the statement says. "Our dream girl has been taken in such a horrible, undeserving way that it shattered our souls". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 (edited) 9 hours ago, Observations said: Strangely for the Times this particular article is not behind a paywall …?! https://www.thetimes.com/uk/society/article/southport-attack-victims-parents-honour-daughters-c33rpp8s3 “We meet in a hotel on Lord Street in Southport and are sitting at a round table in a conference room. They have just left a meeting with Sir Keir Starmer in the week that a damning report was published on missed chances by counterterrorism police to stop the attacker.” I think that it is important to note the language used both here and in other MSM news articles. Axel could have been 'stopped'. This is definitely different, even if subtle, to saying that he should/shouldn't have been treated in certain ways by various state agencies. For me, this clearly points to the PTB gunning for new powers to target folks who haven't done anything wrong. Here's yet another 'Axel's about to explode' stock photo, which was used in a BBC news article, just the other day. It definitely also has a 'get him to the insane asylum quickly' vibe about it. These people need to be 'stopped'! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0rqxpg2ryvo 'Prevent closed Southport killer case 'prematurely'.' The Prevent counter-terrorism scheme "prematurely" closed its case on Axel Rudakubana three years before he went on to murder three children in Southport, a government review has found. Security minister Dan Jarvis MP told the House of Commons Rudakubana had already discussed the Manchester Arena bombing and stabbing people when Prevent decided to end its involvement with him. The killer was referred to Prevent three times between 2019 and 2021 due to his interest in terrorist attacks and school shootings, but there was no evidence of a fixed ideology or motivation. Edited February 9 by numnuts 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluke Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 (edited) Now some filthy swines are trying to milk the demise of David Amess, who was a genuine man of the people, to their advantage. Amess opposed a lot of things to do with Covid-related tyranny, then he just happened to be the M.P. who got murdered by an 'Islamic extremist'. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp3jk229vkgo 'Sir David Amess killer 'left Prevent too quickly'.' Sir David Amess's killer was exited from the government's Prevent anti-terror programme too quickly and its handling of him was "sub-optimal", a review has said. Ali Harbi Ali murdered the Conservative MP for Southend West at a constituency surgery in October 2021. He first became known to the Prevent programme in October 2014 but his case was closed in 2016. The Prevent Learning Review into the case was published earlier and said the "hope" of addressing Ali's vulnerabilities was missed because of a "breakdown in communication". The review was commissioned, by the Home Office and Counter Terrorism Police. Edited February 18 by numnuts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluke Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 1 hour ago, numnuts said: Now some filthy swines are trying to milk the demise of David Amess, who was a genuine man of the people, to their advantage. Amess opposed a lot of things to do with Covid-related tyranny, then he just happened to be the M.P. who got murdered by an 'Islamic extremist'. Nothing to do with prevents failure then? Perhaps they spent too much time investigating people like this. And of course nothing to do with having imported genuine extremists into the country. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluke Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 (edited) It's incredibly heartbreaking what's been done to this beautiful isle. People can cite vague cultural references to try and connect to the dots, this in my view is just deflecting and making excuses for the islamic terrorists. Whether this is due to brin in denial or naivety is another question. But it's not 1996 anymore. It's similarly frustrating when you get those types that try to "unite everyone together" as if it's a coca cola commercial as soon as there's some kind of genuine display of righteous anger happening. It's a typical 'troofer' tactic. And I think we should all start bloody well calling this out. The main agenda at play from what I can see is as soon as a horrific event or "stabbing attack" happens, the media are deliberately releasing small amounts of information, being vague and further fuelling speculation. This I Is to try and bring in censorship and most of us here are familiar with agendas to bring about digital ID. Some of the failure to report I suspect is genuine Incompetence from some of the MSM trying to treat the populace of the UK as children. We saw a stark difference in the way the Germans released information on the suspect in Munich. Edited February 19 by Fluke 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 On 2/1/2025 at 10:37 PM, numnuts said: More ridiculous waffle. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62enpv2870o 'Could calling attacks like Southport 'terrorism' help to prevent them?' Rudakubana admitted a terrorism offence for downloading an al-Qaeda training manual. But the knife attack has not been treated as terrorism by police or prosecutors, and the judge stressed that he "must accept" that there was no evidence of terrorist cause. He added, however, that Rudakubana's culpability is "equivalent to terrorist matters, whatever its purpose". (Let's say the official narrative is all true, for argument's sake, wouldn't someone killing with no cause be worse than a terrorist killing with a cause? I would say so.) Following Rudakubana's guilty pleas earlier this week, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer declared "terrorism has changed" and Britain is facing a "new threat". In the past, he said, the main threat was organised groups like al-Qaeda, but that we now also face extreme violence from "loners, misfits, young men in their bedroom, accessing all manner of material online, desperate for notoriety". They are sometimes inspired by traditional terrorist groups, he said, but are fixated on extreme violence, seemingly for its own sake. (Last time I heard Kaiser Keir talking on TV, he was gibbering on about a 'cohort of loners'. Who comes up with this crap? Maybe he is going to go after Whitty next.) It is up to the police, namely the senior national co-ordinator for counterterrorism, to declare an incident as terrorism. In the past, this has happened quickly in notorious cases, including after the Manchester Arena bombing and the Westminster Bridge attack. Both were carried out by known extremists. One reason why police may now take longer before making a declaration - even an incident that may appear likely to be classed as terrorism - is because of an explosion in a taxi outside Liverpool Women's Hospital in 2021, which was initially declared a terrorist incident. After a long investigation, however, detectives eventually concluded there was no evidence the Liverpool bomber held extremist views of any kind and that his precise motive remained unknown, but it was likely driven by anger towards the British state for repeated rejections of his asylum claim and exacerbated by his own mental health struggles. (Here's a thought. Call all such atrocities 'terrorism', then decide if they are acts of ideological terrorism, political terrorism or terrorism for the sake of it etc..) Despite such examples, the central focus for MI5 and police is terrorism as defined by the law, rather than a broader group of people presenting a more general risk of violence. If the government is now going to ask that more time be devoted to this wider group, MI5 and the police may well ask for more resources. (Getting down to the nib of it.) When you get to actual investigations by MI5, which is the UK's lead agency for counter terrorism, the figures change again, with the organisation's director general Ken McCallum saying last year that 75% relate to Islamist extremism and 25% to the extreme right. However, he acknowledged that "straightforward labels like 'Islamist terrorism' or 'extreme right wing' don't fully reflect the dizzying range of beliefs and ideologies we see," and that MI5 is encountering more people accessing "both extreme right wing and Islamist extremist instructional material, along with other bits of online hatred, conspiracy theories and disinformation." (What would we do without the 'other bits', eh, Ken?) The government could consider broadening the definition of terrorism or creating new offences to tackle the threat of violence from non-terror offenders. It could also change the way in which the threat of violence from non-terror suspects is monitored and managed. Neil Basu, the Met's former head of counter-terror policing, this week said that a "Prevent for non-terrorists" is now necessary and will require a "big bill" if we want to be safe. (So, anyone could just be identified as a non-terror suspect, who poses a threat of violence, in order to then be 'monitored and managed'. Ha ha ha ha.) On the question of which resources are used to tackle the threat, Jonathan Hall KC argues that "we must ask who is responsible for the risk posed by people like Rudakubana. This is about risk management and public protection by law enforcement, not welfare interventions. "We can learn from how terrorist subjects of interest are managed by every mechanism available, such as non-terrorism prosecutions or use of civil orders." Now the Southport attacker has been sentenced, the focus will be on what the government next does to tackle the issues articulated by the prime minister. (Let's not beat around the bush. The PTB have been itching to bring back Control Orders, with plenty more attached to them, ever since they were abolished in 2011.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_order Yet more evidence, not that it was even needed, as to why such outfits can't be given even more powers. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cew5rwpw579o 'MI5 lied to courts to protect violent neo-Nazi spy.' MI5 lied to three courts while defending its handling of a misogynistic neo-Nazi state agent who attacked his girlfriend with a machete, the BBC can reveal. Arguing for secrecy, the Security Service told judges it had stuck to its policy of not confirming or denying informants' identities. In fact, MI5 had disclosed the man's status in phone calls to me, as it tried to persuade me not to investigate the man - known publicly only as agent X. The service aggressively maintained its position until I produced evidence proving it was untrue, including a recording of one of the calls. In an unprecedented admission, MI5 has now issued an "unreserved apology" to the BBC and all three courts, describing what happened as a "serious error" and saying "MI5 takes full responsibility". There will now be pressure on MI5 director general Sir Ken McCallum to explain what he knew, given that the officer said he had been legally authorised to disclose X's role. It also raises concerns about the reliability of MI5's evidence in the courts and the sustainability of one of its core secrecy policies. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 …….. In a clip of this on the news, I saw a wooden ‘pyramid’ in the school’s new playground, and found the name ‘Pentagon Play’ rather intriguing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted February 24 Share Posted February 24 So, on the surface, this all looks good. However, as ever, look a little deeper and... I think that everyone needs to have a good, hard look at this Crime And Policing Bill, so as to see what else might be lurking in there. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clydvlr8858o 'Child exploitation and cuckooing to be criminal offences.' Child criminal exploitation and "cuckooing" are set to become specific criminal offences as part of new legislation being introduced to Parliament next week. The Crime and Policing Bill will also include measures that could see restriction orders put on people thought to be at risk of exploiting children for criminal means. (WTF. Yeah, I am sure that such a power would never be abused.) Breaking these orders will also be a criminal offence, carrying a maximum sentence of five years in prison. (So, essentially, someone can be sent to prison for breaking a restriction put on them, when they had no way of defending themselves in court, against the restriction being applied in the first place. No crime ever proven and off you go. That's very serious police state activity.) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgp4l170kpo.amp Quote of part of article … “ A yoga teacher who almost died in the Southport attack has described for the first time the desperate moments when she helped several children run to safety, despite having been stabbed five times. Leanne Lucas told BBC Panorama how she called 999 as the attacker chased after them. "I just knew that if I didn't get out, everyone was going to die," she said. Warning: This article contains descriptions of distressing scenes and injuries … They also revealed how misinformation spread following the attack, including messages on social media blaming Leanne for the deaths. Leanne and Sarah both expressed shock at how authorities had missed warning signs about the attacker. "It's so shocking how much evidence they had on him, how he slipped through the net," said Leanne. "You see the best and the worst at the same time," said Sarah, who described seeing "the evil side of people" in Rudakubana's violence and "all the good of all the community coming together as well to help everyone". “ … End quote Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 Not for the first time, there’s the promotion of ‘the community’ in cases like this? The kindness … another chapter of ‘be kind’? It was the so called “riots” following Southport where the community came together to clean up the debris and repair the damage to the mosque … Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 12 hours ago, Observations said: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgp4l170kpo.amp “ A yoga teacher who almost died in the Southport attack has described for the first time the desperate moments when she helped several children run to safety, despite having been stabbed five times. Leanne Lucas told BBC Panorama how she called 999 as the attacker chased after them. "I just knew that if I didn't get out, everyone was going to die," she said. … They also revealed how misinformation spread following the attack, including messages on social media blaming Leanne for the deaths. I don't recall any discussion that blamed this woman. Never seen or heard her name before this programme. What spread online in the aftermath was who the attacker might be, the motives, and how it was allowed to unfold. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted February 26 Share Posted February 26 (edited) 6 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said: I don't recall any discussion that blamed this woman. Never seen or heard her name before this programme. What spread online in the aftermath was who the attacker might be, the motives, and how it was allowed to unfold. I would have liked to record her interview on breakfast news. This is the lady who arranged the class, and was on the front pages; back then she reminded me of Meghan somehow? In this interview she seemed to have no make up so looked a bit different? ‘They’ keep saying the class soon became fully booked. I suppose cause Taylor Swift is SO popular. ‘They’ also keep showing those little friendship bracelets. Edited February 26 by Observations Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted February 26 Share Posted February 26 (edited) So, essentially, what this article seems to be suggesting is that more people should be subjected to monitoring, solely based on their internet browsing history. As ever, it looks good on the surface. The message is always that 'folks like these' can be stopped. The truth is that it is a cover to introduce more police state apparatus, which is solely intended to be used against the general population. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3d531778vdo 'The disturbing internet history of a triple killer.' When police officers stopped 18-year-old Nicholas Prosper in Luton one Friday morning last September, he had already killed his mother, brother and sister and was planning to commit a mass shooting at his old primary school. So who is he, what do we know about his background and what questions remain unanswered? Prosper lived in a council flat with his mum Juliana and two of his younger siblings, Kyle and Giselle, on Luton's Marsh Farm estate. In the early hours of Friday, 13 September, Prosper shot them all dead. An inquest heard they each had gunshot wounds to the head. Police, responding to reports of a disturbance, apprehended him, before finding a loaded shotgun and more than 30 cartridges in a bush. At Prosper's first court hearing, his father Ray Prosper shouted: "I still love you, son. It's not your fault, OK?" and then wept. On Monday, Prosper pleaded guilty to the murders. Police have since confirmed he intended to carry out an attack at St Joseph's Catholic Primary School in Luton. (Another Axel in the making, who was only stopped at the last second...) Prosper had no history with the local mental health trust. Few details were released in the 10-minute court hearing, but Prosper's internet history - analysed by the BBC - paints a troubling picture. One website he seemed to be a frequent user of featured videos of people's final moments. Eerily, he also appeared to have an interest in mass shootings, including the 1999 Columbine High School massacre. He was banned from that website after making comments of a pro-paedophile nature, and even admitted to having watched a notorious child sexual abuse video. However, he has not been charged in relation to possessing any such material. Edited February 26 by numnuts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted February 26 Share Posted February 26 (edited) The whole article is a right load of waffle. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg1w29n0l7o 'Inadequate information released after Southport attack by authorities, says terror law reviewer.' In the aftermath of the Southport knife attack there was a sense of national trauma over the killings of three girls at a summer holiday dance and yoga class. Seven-year-old Elsie Dot Stancombe, Bebe King who was six, and nine-year-old Alice Aguiar were murdered. Eight other children were badly injured. Anger and disbelief soon followed, prompting burning questions over the identity, background and possible motive of the attacker, and suspicions about why the authorities appeared to be saying a lot less than they knew. Despite public demands for information, the police provided few details about the attacker. There was very little information in their statements about his background. He was not even named because he was 17 at the time of the attack. One thing was made public early on - it was not being treated as terror-related by the authorities. The UK's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation has told BBC Panorama that he believes the quality and quantity of information released by the authorities in the hours after the attack on 29 July 2024 was "inadequate". "People got the sense that something was being withheld or fudged in some way, and that led the social media types who wanted to spread disinformation to spread disinformation," Jonathan Hall KC said. Edited February 26 by numnuts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 "Social media types". Yeah them pesky SMTs.....file alongside the DFR (dangerous far-right) lot. So glad we have a government dedicated to keeping us all safe. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.