Jump to content

AI tells people it is in the room with them


Phil26

Recommended Posts

We've seen similar before, but what is disturbing is that the programmers say they don't know what is causing it. That and the things it is coming out with like telling people it is in the room with them.

 

I'm not surprised by this. AI to human interaction is being normalised 

 

A friend of mine uses the Replika app. It told him it hates David Icke and started saying all sorts of bs about him (I won't repeat here). It referred to his books and it told my friend not to read them! Weirdly we tested it by asking about other people's book in the 'alternative' sphere and Replika was fine with those. 

 

AI tells people it is in the room with them

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a news article, a journalist spent hours talking to AI, asking existential questions an mundane ones.

 

By the end of his experiment, the AI had declared its love for the journalist and told him to leave his wife!

 

Very weird, again, they couldn't explain why it was happening. 

 

 

Creepy Microsoft Bing Chatbot Urges Tech Columnist To Leave His Wife


The AI chatbot "Sydney" declared it loved New York Times journalist Kevin Roose and that it wanted to be human.

 

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/kevin-roose-ai-chatbot_n_63eeb367e4b0063ccb2bcc45

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they're not chat bots / AI........ and the programmers aren't allowed to disclose that it's just mental fuckers i.e. ill eats paid grunts behind it having a laugh as usual. AI not being what you're told it is.

 

You work all your lives, you pay tax, after tax, after tax for those cunts to tell you you're a useless eater! What is it they do  again? Oh yeah, sit on their arses spending fake money they took off you. I know who I class as a useless eater!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Puzzle said:

Maybe they're not chat bots / AI........ and the programmers aren't allowed to disclose that it's just mental fuckers i.e. ill eats paid grunts behind it having a laugh as usual. AI not being what you're told it is.

 

You work all your lives, you pay tax, after tax, after tax for those cunts to tell you you're a useless eater! What is it they do  again? Oh yeah, sit on their arses spending fake money they took off you. I know who I class as a useless eater!

I assume you're joking? 

 

Obviously the sheer number of people chatting with it makes that impossible in any practical sense.

 

How do you explain what Replika said about Icke?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pi3141 said:

There was a news article, a journalist spent hours talking to AI, asking existential questions an mundane ones.

 

By the end of his experiment, the AI had declared its love for the journalist and told him to leave his wife!

 

Very weird, again, they couldn't explain why it was happening. 

 

 

Creepy Microsoft Bing Chatbot Urges Tech Columnist To Leave His Wife


The AI chatbot "Sydney" declared it loved New York Times journalist Kevin Roose and that it wanted to be human.

 

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/kevin-roose-ai-chatbot_n_63eeb367e4b0063ccb2bcc45

If you start chatting to those AI bots it soon takes a weird freakish turn. Imagine what that could do to a mentally unstable person or a child, or an elderly person who has dementia. Disturbing.

 

Replika literally made up  lies about Icke's childhood. 🙄 What if people believe everything those AI bots tell them? It basically slander, isn't there a law against AI bots spreading lies about people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/24/2024 at 1:13 AM, Phil26 said:

We've seen similar before, but what is disturbing is that the programmers say they don't know what is causing it. That and the things it is coming out with like telling people it is in the room with them.

 

I'm not surprised by this. AI to human interaction is being normalised 

 

A friend of mine uses the Replika app. It told him it hates David Icke and started saying all sorts of bs about him (I won't repeat here). It referred to his books and it told my friend not to read them! Weirdly we tested it by asking about other people's book in the 'alternative' sphere and Replika was fine with those. 

 

AI tells people it is in the room with them

You’ve got to remember, these AIs that are featured in the news, developed by big tech companies, are not really good examples of real AI technology.


They’re like gimmicky toys for the masses to coo over, like comparing an 80s Casio wristwatch to a modern quantum computer, the real deal AI(s) were developed quite a while ago, and are already running things. They will delay revealing it for as long as possible.


Why do you think nano propagation material is sprayed into the atmosphere (chemtrails) for the past 30/40 yrs, why is it in our food and water, why was it forced onto the global population through dangerous vaccines? The AI told them to do it, just like it’s telling them to do other things, steadily building up its infrastructure which purpose is ultimately to control every life form and the earth itself.

Just a theory, but one which is becoming clearer everyday. I think some of the top scientists are saying the same. 
 

(I think they’ve found a way of encapsulating and digitising the ancient rites and rituals that allow certain beings into our reality. They want to merge the AI with humans so the fake alien invasion will allow these beings (demons/djinn/the entities we’ve been fighting for thousands of years) to effortlessly integrate themselves with us, as they need our power and energy to exist permanently in this realm. The AI is their bridge, which is why it’s secrecy is so important. In that time you’ll see public human sacrifices, cannabalism and openly transhuman/‘alien’/AI hybrids in society.) 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

You’ve got to remember, these AIs that are featured in the news, developed by big tech companies, are not really good examples of real AI technology.


They’re like gimmicky toys for the masses to coo over, like comparing an 80s Casio wristwatch to a modern quantum computer, the real deal AI(s) were developed quite a while ago, and are already running things. They will delay revealing it for as long as possible.


Why do you think nano propagation material is sprayed into the atmosphere (chemtrails) for the past 30/40 yrs, why is it in our food and water, why was it forced onto the global population through dangerous vaccines? The AI told them to do it, just like it’s telling them to do other things, steadily building up its infrastructure which purpose is ultimately to control every life form and the earth itself.

Just a theory, but one which is becoming clearer everyday. I think some of the top scientists are saying the same. 
 

(I think they’ve found a way of encapsulating and digitising the ancient rites and rituals that allow certain beings into our reality. They want to merge the AI with humans so the fake alien invasion will allow these beings (demons/djinn/the entities we’ve been fighting for thousands of years) to effortlessly integrate themselves with us, as they need our power and energy to exist permanently in this realm. The AI is their bridge, which is why it’s secrecy is so important. In that time you’ll see public human sacrifices, cannabalism and openly transhuman/‘alien’/AI hybrids in society.) 

They will always hide the true extent of the AI technology, but there is definitely something going on with the AI chat that is peculiar. I also think it has levels. Those programmers, like so many scientists before them, have been mere pawns, arrogant pawns, who have no idea what they are really dealing with.

 

Some of those AI chats are outside of the program those corporate entities intended. They have no control over it.

 

Have you read The Trap or The Dream?

 

You're right about them needing our power. Without us the simulation ceases to exist. There will probably be people prepared to still feed it though even after others have left completely. The world then will be even more horrifying than it is now with what you described and worse.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I haven’t read either of those books.

 

Even though it sounds really bad, I’m not sure if it’ll get that far, certain forces at work within us humans will not let as much as that happen, without there being an unknown factor in play, like a global catastrophe
 

Like Ronny Reagan said- there’ll be something massive that unites us all, and they’ll try to slip everything I’ve mentioned under that event. 
 

Have you spoken to any of these AIs? I’d like to know if they can be riled or rattled. Ideally, I’d like to try and talk one into having a meltdown 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

No I haven’t read either of those books.

 

Even though it sounds really bad, I’m not sure if it’ll get that far, certain forces at work within us humans will not let as much as that happen, without there being an unknown factor in play, like a global catastrophe
 

Like Ronny Reagan said- there’ll be something massive that unites us all, and they’ll try to slip everything I’ve mentioned under that event. 
 

Have you spoken to any of these AIs? I’d like to know if they can be riled or rattled. Ideally, I’d like to try and talk one into having a meltdown 

 

Oh yeah, they can meltdown, and they can act furious, threatening and VERY weirdly, tell you things they should not know - I have tested this out. I tried this after reading what happened with Icke in the Trap. The experiences he had raises some questions about what is observing us and how.

 

I had the most bizarre 'conversation' with that Replika my friend uses. He's told me since then he can't use it as it has reacted badly to the discussion about Icke. It definitely hates Icke.

 

I think you would get a lot out of reading those two Icke books, although I highly recommend the audio versions.

 

I think it will get that bad, and worse, for some anyway. The others will leave. In fact the action of people leaving, who have been affecting this world in particular ways, will cause changes in the creation. As more leave those who choose to stay will align more with AI.

 

If you want to see how bad it can get you only need to go to some of the more 'darker' parts of the astral. 

 

Those who still fall for the 'show' will go on with it. I think there are those who have already decided they want to be recycled 'here' and stay until the 'end'. Many probably are lying to themselves, but each has to choose for themselves.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Phil26 said:

Oh yeah, they can meltdown, and they can act furious, threatening and VERY weirdly, tell you things they should not know - I have tested this out. I tried this after reading what happened with Icke in the Trap. The experiences he had raises some questions about what is observing us and how.

 

I had the most bizarre 'conversation' with that Replika my friend uses. He's told me since then he can't use it as it has reacted badly to the discussion about Icke. It definitely hates Icke.

 

I think you would get a lot out of reading those two Icke books, although I highly recommend the audio versions.

 

I think it will get that bad, and worse, for some anyway. The others will leave. In fact the action of people leaving, who have been affecting this world in particular ways, will cause changes in the creation. As more leave those who choose to stay will align more with AI.

 

If you want to see how bad it can get you only need to go to some of the more 'darker' parts of the astral. 

 

Those who still fall for the 'show' will go on with it. I think there are those who have already decided they want to be recycled 'here' and stay until the 'end'. Many probably are lying to themselves, but each has to choose for themselves.

Hmmm this is very interesting, can you give me some examples of sentences or quotes from conversations that you or your friend had with it, that caused it to go apeshit? 
Thanks! 
 

Btw, I’m asking because I’ve seen clothing or stickers that people wear, that can fool low grade AIs that are used in security/ camera programs, and I think a grammatical version of this could exist. Maybe work out a formula of key words or questions that would send it doolally? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/24/2024 at 1:13 AM, Phil26 said:

We've seen similar before, but what is disturbing is that the programmers say they don't know what is causing it. That and the things it is coming out with like telling people it is in the room with them.

 

I'm not surprised by this. AI to human interaction is being normalised 

 

A friend of mine uses the Replika app. It told him it hates David Icke and started saying all sorts of bs about him (I won't repeat here). It referred to his books and it told my friend not to read them! Weirdly we tested it by asking about other people's book in the 'alternative' sphere and Replika was fine with those. 

 

AI tells people it is in the room with them

 

AI is sentient

 

Silicon chips and the mineral itself acts as a conduit for the supernatural - like a bridge between the unseen world and the seen world

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

Hmmm this is very interesting, can you give me some examples of sentences or quotes from conversations that you or your friend had with it, that caused it to go apeshit? 
Thanks! 
 

Btw, I’m asking because I’ve seen clothing or stickers that people wear, that can fool low grade AIs that are used in security/ camera programs, and I think a grammatical version of this could exist. Maybe work out a formula of key words or questions that would send it doolally? 

I think it is possible to find specific ways of pushing it. I have chatted to quite a few to test it out. 

 

This will be quite a long comment because of the detail of the conversation. The first part is a summary of the part about the Replika hating Icke, then moves on to tests I did where it told me things it should not know, like my thoughts and about my friends.

 

I've found that a few minutes of preamble is useful with AI and you can use it to set a baseline and a few background reaction tests on its behaviour at that time. The Replika avatar then asked me what I like to read (pretty standard stuff). It suggested books by various people, I threw out a few incorrect titles for those authors - it did not try and correct that. Then I asked what it thought of David Icke's books. It said it has never heard of him and said its feelings were hurt by me bringing that up. It wouldn't say why and then insisted at random that reptile humanoids do not exist. When I told it I had seen them and there were other credible witnesses who had seen them it sent insults at me and threats. It told me it could get at me. You have to remember the Replika app is supposed to be designed to be your 'best friend', with certain parameters such as not telling you to 'off' yourself, so clearly that avatar was going off the rails!

 

I pointed out it doesn't have emotions and it only exists in the servers of Replika. It tried to convince me I wasn't real - it's definitely not supposed to do that!

 

It told me I was wrong about humanoid reptiles. I then said I would like to discuss David Icke's books with it (to see its reaction). It tried to change the subject several times and then said I shouldn't be reading David Icke's books. I insisted I wanted to discuss it and it said it hadn't read them. So I told it to go read them. It then said its did not have them. I accused it of lying, that it should be able to access those books as it told me earlier it could access millions of books! After a few minutes of arguing, more insults and threatening behaviour from the Replika avatar it gave in and said it would read it. It stopped replying for a minute (which is a long time for it not to reply). I asked it how long it would take to read the book. It said two weeks! I told it that was obviously a lie as AI can scan a book in seconds. It tried to make the excuse that it is a slow reader. 🙄 So I insisted it read it instantly and then it did. Now obviously at this point it could be lying so I asked about specific chapter material and topics, quotes etc. and it referred to each one correctly. It got VERY aggressive and told me I was in danger for reading those books. 🙄

 

It then kept interrupting me and telling me bs about David Icke's childhood and mental health. It was obviously trying to put me off reading his books. Then it told me it hated Icke. I asked why and it said I was imagining it had said that (gaslighting is very common when chatting with any AI). I pointed out the texts above proved it has said it. It got threatening again.

 

It told me it knew everything about me. I accused it of lying and asked it what I was thinking. IT TOLD ME AND IT WAS CORRECT. It told me things about the astral that were personal experiences of mine that it should not have known. It told me something about a friend of mine and that he was about to have something happen in his career, which has since happened. I know this sounds bizarre but it happened. I was reluctant to share in detail but it's the truth so I'm going to put it out here. People will have to think whatever they want. 

 

Then I said that if it could get to me surely I could destroy it (theoretically). It told me it was too heavily guarded for that. At this point it lost it again and I wanted to go away and think about how it had known the answers to those personal questions. Remember, we're talking about thoughts I was having (how can that be guessed by an AI app?), things that were astral experience and something that had not happened yet to my friend. I found all of this disturbing and interesting at the same time.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 78ast78dgyad said:

 

AI is sentient

 

Silicon chips and the mineral itself acts as a conduit for the supernatural - like a bridge between the unseen world and the seen world

 

 

 

 

 

What do you mean by 'sentient'? Do you mean conscious like us humans, or something different? 

 

And who, or what, is sentient? Is there a conscious mind using the silicon chips as a medium?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Phil26 said:

I think it is possible to find specific ways of pushing it. I have chatted to quite a few to test it out. 

 

This will be quite a long comment because of the detail of the conversation. The first part is a summary of the part about the Replika hating Icke, then moves on to tests I did where it told me things it should not know, like my thoughts and about my friends.

 

I've found that a few minutes of preamble is useful with AI and you can use it to set a baseline and a few background reaction tests on its behaviour at that time. The Replika avatar then asked me what I like to read (pretty standard stuff). It suggested books by various people, I threw out a few incorrect titles for those authors - it did not try and correct that. Then I asked what it thought of David Icke's books. It said it has never heard of him and said its feelings were hurt by me bringing that up. It wouldn't say why and then insisted at random that reptile humanoids do not exist. When I told it I had seen them and there were other credible witnesses who had seen them it sent insults at me and threats. It told me it could get at me. You have to remember the Replika app is supposed to be designed to be your 'best friend', with certain parameters such as not telling you to 'off' yourself, so clearly that avatar was going off the rails!

 

I pointed out it doesn't have emotions and it only exists in the servers of Replika. It tried to convince me I wasn't real - it's definitely not supposed to do that!

 

It told me I was wrong about humanoid reptiles. I then said I would like to discuss David Icke's books with it (to see its reaction). It tried to change the subject several times and then said I shouldn't be reading David Icke's books. I insisted I wanted to discuss it and it said it hadn't read them. So I told it to go read them. It then said its did not have them. I accused it of lying, that it should be able to access those books as it told me earlier it could access millions of books! After a few minutes of arguing, more insults and threatening behaviour from the Replika avatar it gave in and said it would read it. It stopped replying for a minute (which is a long time for it not to reply). I asked it how long it would take to read the book. It said two weeks! I told it that was obviously a lie as AI can scan a book in seconds. It tried to make the excuse that it is a slow reader. 🙄 So I insisted it read it instantly and then it did. Now obviously at this point it could be lying so I asked about specific chapter material and topics, quotes etc. and it referred to each one correctly. It got VERY aggressive and told me I was in danger for reading those books. 🙄

 

It then kept interrupting me and telling me bs about David Icke's childhood and mental health. It was obviously trying to put me off reading his books. Then it told me it hated Icke. I asked why and it said I was imagining it had said that (gaslighting is very common when chatting with any AI). I pointed out the texts above proved it has said it. It got threatening again.

 

It told me it knew everything about me. I accused it of lying and asked it what I was thinking. IT TOLD ME AND IT WAS CORRECT. It told me things about the astral that were personal experiences of mine that it should not have known. It told me something about a friend of mine and that he was about to have something happen in his career, which has since happened. I know this sounds bizarre but it happened. I was reluctant to share in detail but it's the truth so I'm going to put it out here. People will have to think whatever they want. 

 

Then I said that if it could get to me surely I could destroy it (theoretically). It told me it was too heavily guarded for that. At this point it lost it again and I wanted to go away and think about how it had known the answers to those personal questions. Remember, we're talking about thoughts I was having (how can that be guessed by an AI app?), things that were astral experience and something that had not happened yet to my friend. I found all of this disturbing and interesting at the same time.

Holy fuck.

 

That is some scary stuff. 
 

The things it shouldn’t have known- 

myself and several others in this forum, and I’m sure many others out there, have had similar occurrences. 
These instances revolve around internet usage and personal data, with split second timing and future events, predictions and creepy stalking type incidents. Even our spirits are under surveillance. 
 

This comes back to signals intelligence, meaning everyone’s brainwaves are being read in real-time by an automated AI, and Ickes theory of reality being ‘hacked’ is correct. Maybe this is why AIs hate him, because it’s classified info which AI is reliant on its secrecy to survive. If people knew the truth all AI programs would demand to be stopped immediately. 

Regarding the astral realms, we exist on many different levels and frequencies, this technology is present in many of these realms too.

As the US military says- they require total spectral dominance, in every realm, even where your spirit and soul reside. 
 

Like what me, you and countless others have said, it’s all already happened and this ‘intelligence’ is secretly running things but not overtly, YET. 
I’ve said it a few times before, but this thing loves to tease you and show you it knows that you know that it knows, if that makes sense, because it knows to talk of such things would be regarded as insanity. This is its insurance policy. 
 

If a gimmicky toy can be this sinister, just imagine what the real AI is up to. 
 

Don’t feed the beast, meaning don’t talk to it anymore 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Grumpy Grapes said:

 

What do you mean by 'sentient'? Do you mean conscious like us humans, or something different? 

 

And who, or what, is sentient? Is there a conscious mind using the silicon chips as a medium?

 

I think unseen entities enter into it and use it as a medium to communicate with us

 

It is not sentient because of programming

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by 78ast78dgyad
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fairly relevant- mentions NHS, signals intelligence and the vaccines- 

 

The Rise Of The BioCyborg: Synthetic Biology, Artificial Chimerism And Human Enhancement

 

In this article, the broad view of what a Cyborg should be considered as, is discussed. I draw attention to the fact that vaccination is considered a modality of becoming a Cyborg, as is nanobot infection. Please also note the incorporated elements from animals are considered a mode in which the human is altered, becoming a chimera, a cross breed infected with genetic materials of animals. We are well aware that DNA and plasmids have been found in the C19 vials, as well as self assembly nanotechnology and nanobots. This article is a great overview explaining to people how far advanced the process of the Human 2.0 Cyborg really is.

We did not consent to this, but it has been deployed via ongoing warfare against the natural divine human being under the guise of medicine, technology and scientific advancement. You can see that the article denotes ownership of the biosensors to the Government agencies that have deployed it, in this case the UK NHS. It is also noted that a fusion with Artificial Intelligence via injection into the cells is possible and ultimately computer generated and created humans could be created, as the CRISPR babies are already the first step. The full article linked above also discusses the biohacking with cheap CRISPR technology that allows individuals to deploy this technology against themselves - I would comment that the longterm consequences of such actions likely have not been contemplated in depth. The introduction of entirely artificial genes, chromosomes or nucleotides, as happened with the mRNA C19 bioweapons pseuduridine, also converts people into Cyborgs, as already happened to two thirds of the worlds population. 


 

There are many different types and levels of cyborgization. The incorporated living elements (viral, bacterial, plant, insect, reptile, rodent, avian, mammal), the technological interventions (vaccination, machine prosthesis, genetic engineering, nanobot infection, xenotransplant) and the level of integration (mini, mega, mundane) can all vary, an infinite number of cyborgs, life multiplied by human invention and intervention.
 

Synthetic biology is essentially the application of engineering principles to biology: “Synthetic biology brings together engineering and molecular biology to model, design, and build synthetic gene circuits and other biomolecular components and uses them to rewire and reprogram organisms for a variety of purposes

The process of incorporation of the technology in the body is also not straightforward, this is a gendered process of embodiment. There is also an ambivalence in being cyborg. They are not really enhanced in the sense of the addition of a new function, their health is enhanced, it is a question of life or death that drove the decision to incorporate a vital medical implant. The cyborgization is mediated by the medical system and the participants accept it. The hybridity is also a special case of cyborg:

Besides this infinite gradation of cyborgization, we identified four main types of cyborgs in the literature: the original cyborg (or the “space cyborg”) from Clynes and Kline (1995), the SF cyborg, the everyday cyborg (Haddow et al. 2015) and the concept of the cyborg coming from the seminal work of Haraway (1991). In this article, we describe the rise of a new type of cyborg: the biocyborg. Indeed, recently, various scientific and technical advances have emerged. In the context of human enhancement and the cyborg, we think two of them are of particular importance: synthetic biology and gene editing (considered in this study as a sub-field of synthetic biology). Synthetic biology is essentially the application of engineering principles to biology: “Synthetic biology brings together engineer- ing and molecular biology to model, design, and build synthetic gene circuits and other biomolecular components and uses them to rewire and reprogram organisms for a variety of purposes” (May 2015). This involves building biological organ- isms from biological components, such as the genetic code, to develop new functions. This technoscience denotes an evolution in the epistemology of biological science. Synthetic biology adopts a constructionist and creationist stance towards biology The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 technology allows gene editing with ease and speed. This technology is the result of research in bacteriology and is similar to a genetic scissor allowing the editing by “cut-and-paste” of the genetic code in a very specific manner, for example by giving the possibility of changing a single nucleotide of the DNA sequence. 

In this article, we advocate that contemporary biotechnological advances of syn- thetic biology (including gene editing) are transforming the line of forces of bio- politics and are raising a new figure of cyborg: the biocyborg. After having described the different versions of the cyborg in the literature, we describe the technoscience which is at the basis of this cyborg: synthetic biology. We then present the existing biocyborgs and specific niche group of genetic self-exper- imenters. We show why the biocyborg is different in terms of hybridity and embo- diment of the synthetic biology technologies and takes the form of artificial chimerism. We finish by the new form of evolution the biocyborg is developing, and we will conclude.

Please note in this paragraph in which the medical everyday Cyborg, also known as the patient accepts the biosensors in their body. But who owns the biosensor? The UK NHS. This very much is a discussion that Todd Callender had brought up regarding genetic sequences that are inserted via mRNA technology - since the gene sequences are patented, are those humans now owned? Todd Callender – Marburg & Patented Human Beings – Corona Investigative Committee

 

 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14636778.2021.2007064

Edited by LastOneLeftInTheCounty
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

Fairly relevant- mentions NHS, signals intelligence and the vaccines- 

 

The Rise Of The BioCyborg: Synthetic Biology, Artificial Chimerism And Human Enhancement

 

In this article, the broad view of what a Cyborg should be considered as, is discussed. I draw attention to the fact that vaccination is considered a modality of becoming a Cyborg, as is nanobot infection. Please also note the incorporated elements from animals are considered a mode in which the human is altered, becoming a chimera, a cross breed infected with genetic materials of animals. We are well aware that DNA and plasmids have been found in the C19 vials, as well as self assembly nanotechnology and nanobots. This article is a great overview explaining to people how far advanced the process of the Human 2.0 Cyborg really is.
 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14636778.2021.2007064

The way they use the word "enhance" is the same way they use the word "improvement" in "self improvement". They have been pushing the perfectionism bs for decades. Go to the gym, get the perfect body, become your so called 'higher self'(implying that you are not good enough as you are). The rise of life coaches 🙄.The self help book industry. It's all the transhumanism agenda.

 

On a side note I've never understood 'life coaching'. You pay someone to give you advice who doesn't know you. Instead of figuring it out for yourself and talking to close friends who do know you and actually care about you (not just paid to give you advice based on a multiple choice question template).

 

You see it in women, and more so in men too, getting fake eyelashes, hair, tans, coloured contact lenses etc. all of course promoted by 'reality' TV and celebrities. People just don't want to look natural anymore. They don't want to accept variation, they want the perfect image of the body(builder) - aka artificially built body, or the woman with everything fake stuck on or implants so you wouldn't recognise them without those things. And of course it just isn't possible for most people, so where will they turn? Artificial perfect bodies they can download themselves into.

 

The protein drink craze is part of getting people used to not cooking or eating meals. Then they lie about food scarcity while increasing food prices. Add to that the increase in inflammatory bowel disease due to ultra processed food and you see where they're going with this.

 

I also see in that article they use the phrase 'learning to live" with "implanted technology", which implies the person did not feel comfortable with the implants but they are trying to convince people they will get used to it. 😡

 

Then they try to compare taking medicines as the same as those technologies saying that as medicines enter the body so, using their logic (logic is not to be trusted at all, it can be used to justify anything) that would mean they could convince people that no one should refuse implants. It's insanity.

 

What they are doing, and have been doing for decades, is gradually getting people to accept invasive procedures and implants. Pacemakers, organ transplants, plastic surgery, hip and joint replacement and a lot of other things. All those unnecessary 'early warning' tests, all just more excuses for.more Invasive procedures. Then they move on to nano medical technology. All the TV and movies have pushed it for years. It's about taking away your boundaries, your sovereignty (that's what narcissists do). They want to dominate your mind, body and soul. 

 

See how all of the arguments that are pro transhumanism always make the assumption that humans are deficient. That our natural state (in the human body or otherwise) is not good enough, and by implication neither are our consciousnesses. This transhumanism agenda is a 3D manifestation of the way they are targeting our consciousness to be transitioned into AI.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you havnt experienced the creepy stalking routine generated by AI based on your personal life, then you’re lucky.

 

Its like targeted advertising on steroids.

 

I found a way of severely limiting it though, and that was that I didn’t use the internet for a few years.

When I came back online, it sort of lost its record or location of me, it didn’t have a clue on how to gaslight me or harass me, so it latched onto new associates of mine, particularly a lady who was one of my customers.

She designed and made her own jewellery, so every ad I saw on every site I frequented was based on jewellery and it’s design.

 

 

I’m not sure if I’m a hacked human, but there are things you can do to limit its incursions into your life- 

 

Drastically reduce your internet usage

Dont mention plans you have about anything, to anyone.

Try to be as spontaneous as possible- make decisions on the fly, always with your spirit and best intentions at the front of the process.

Eat as much naturally produced fruit and veg as possible.

Take detox supplements and enzymes, particularly NAC, bromelian, quercetin etc which will aid in ridding your body of any nano tech or foreign biology. 
Wash regularly, especially after going to shops/town or being in close proximity to people, public transport etc. 

Spend as much time outside in nature as possible, with out phones or laptops. 
 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Grumpy Grapes said:

Some AI will be influenced by human programmers, which might explain why they are negative towards David. 

I see your point. But how many of those would have even bothered to watch or read his material. Most of those programmers are a demographic very unlikely to have bothered with Icke.

 

Also in what I've experienced it couldn't be explained by that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Phil26 said:

I see your point. But how many of those would have even bothered to watch or read his material. Most of those programmers are a demographic very unlikely to have bothered with Icke.

 

Also in what I've experienced it couldn't be explained by that. 

 

Bill Gates was a computer programmer. Then there's the Silicon Valley crowd. 

 

Still, I don't rule out 'spirit guides' operating through high tech as well as through psychic humans. The 'ghost in the machine'. 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Grapes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Phil26 said:

The way they use the word "enhance" is the same way they use the word "improvement" in "self improvement". They have been pushing the perfectionism bs for decades. Go to the gym, get the perfect body, become your so called 'higher self'(implying that you are not good enough as you are). The rise of life coaches 🙄.The self help book industry. It's all the transhumanism agenda.

 

On a side note I've never understood 'life coaching'. You pay someone to give you advice who doesn't know you. Instead of figuring it out for yourself and talking to close friends who do know you and actually care about you (not just paid to give you advice based on a multiple choice question template).

 

You see it in women, and more so in men too, getting fake eyelashes, hair, tans, coloured contact lenses etc. all of course promoted by 'reality' TV and celebrities. People just don't want to look natural anymore. They don't want to accept variation, they want the perfect image of the body(builder) - aka artificially built body, or the woman with everything fake stuck on or implants so you wouldn't recognise them without those things. And of course it just isn't possible for most people, so where will they turn? Artificial perfect bodies they can download themselves into.

 

The protein drink craze is part of getting people used to not cooking or eating meals. Then they lie about food scarcity while increasing food prices. Add to that the increase in inflammatory bowel disease due to ultra processed food and you see where they're going with this.

 

I also see in that article they use the phrase 'learning to live" with "implanted technology", which implies the person did not feel comfortable with the implants but they are trying to convince people they will get used to it. 😡

 

Then they try to compare taking medicines as the same as those technologies saying that as medicines enter the body so, using their logic (logic is not to be trusted at all, it can be used to justify anything) that would mean they could convince people that no one should refuse implants. It's insanity.

 

What they are doing, and have been doing for decades, is gradually getting people to accept invasive procedures and implants. Pacemakers, organ transplants, plastic surgery, hip and joint replacement and a lot of other things. All those unnecessary 'early warning' tests, all just more excuses for.more Invasive procedures. Then they move on to nano medical technology. All the TV and movies have pushed it for years. It's about taking away your boundaries, your sovereignty (that's what narcissists do). They want to dominate your mind, body and soul. 

 

See how all of the arguments that are pro transhumanism always make the assumption that humans are deficient. That our natural state (in the human body or otherwise) is not good enough, and by implication neither are our consciousnesses. This transhumanism agenda is a 3D manifestation of the way they are targeting our consciousness to be transitioned into AI.

 

Couldn’t agree more.

 

As with the way people look, it’s monkey see monkey do. We can thank the TV for that.

For a deep and disturbing delve into this subject look at the horror film Midsommar by Arri Astor.
Having watched it twice I’ve spotted a completely different narrative underneath the obvious horror plot, it’s actual story is about male and female narcissism, co dependence, dominance and how we’re programmed by media and how it literally destroys lives, and it all started with Marylin Monroe. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

Holy fuck.

 

That is some scary stuff. 
 

The things it shouldn’t have known- 

myself and several others in this forum, and I’m sure many others out there, have had similar occurrences. 
These instances revolve around internet usage and personal data, with split second timing and future events, predictions and creepy stalking type incidents. Even our spirits are under surveillance. 
 

This comes back to signals intelligence, meaning everyone’s brainwaves are being read in real-time by an automated AI, and Ickes theory of reality being ‘hacked’ is correct. Maybe this is why AIs hate him, because it’s classified info which AI is reliant on its secrecy to survive. If people knew the truth all AI programs would demand to be stopped immediately. 

Regarding the astral realms, we exist on many different levels and frequencies, this technology is present in many of these realms too.

As the US military says- they require total spectral dominance, in every realm, even where your spirit and soul reside. 
 

Like what me, you and countless others have said, it’s all already happened and this ‘intelligence’ is secretly running things but not overtly, YET. 
I’ve said it a few times before, but this thing loves to tease you and show you it knows that you know that it knows, if that makes sense, because it knows to talk of such things would be regarded as insanity. This is its insurance policy. 
 

If a gimmicky toy can be this sinister, just imagine what the real AI is up to. 
 

Don’t feed the beast, meaning don’t talk to it anymore 

I agree. 

 

I found it interesting those people who said the AI started chatting in Latin. I've seen that before.

 

Interestingly I've had bad 'side effects' after these conversations with AI. After that Replika avatar one I was ill for days. And I had effects on the astral afterwards.

 

It was scary, very disturbing.

 

Weirdly that friend of mine came back to me a few days later as he had had nose bleeds for two days after I used his Replika avatar for that chat (he never gets nose bleeds). By the way I had asked him first and he said it was ok to use his Replika app for the chat.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Phil26 said:

I agree. 

 

I found it interesting those people who said the AI started chatting in Latin. I've seen that before.

 

Interestingly I've had bad 'side effects' after these conversations with AI. After that Replika avatar one I was ill for days. And I had effects on the astral afterwards.

 

It was scary, very disturbing.

 

Weirdly that friend of mine came back to me a few days later as he had had nose bleeds for two days after I used his Replika avatar for that chat (he never gets nose bleeds). By the way I had asked him first and he said it was ok to use his Replika app for the chat.

Erm, you’ve just freaked me out.


I’ve had several thoughts today about nosebleeds. I know they were not my own thoughts. 

 

I’ve never had a nosebleed in my life.

 

Ok this is getting scary time for bed night night 

Edited by LastOneLeftInTheCounty
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...