Jump to content

David spreading negativity?


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Phil26 said:

The whole transgender movement is tragic. People are being exploited and destroyed by it. There are those who know what they are doing, the psychopaths/narcissists, and those people following it, some to monetize their platforms and other who are sleeping through their existence.

 

The whole concept of transgenderism is designed to manipulate people, especially children. It is also a major part of the system's plan to sexualise younger and young people. Have you read Jennifer Bilek s blog on transgenderism and who is behind the transgender movement?

 

Interestingly the New Agers are pro trans.

 

Another sinister aspect of the transgender movement is that the elites are into mutilation for sexual arousal, which is related  to sacrifice. It is part of the BDSM movement, which is very popular in certain trans groups, especially drag groups.

 

Older male drag trans try to sexualise young boys into misogynistic supposed 'feminised'  submissive (humiliation) roles for their sexual pleasure. It's disgusting. There's a lot of that going on in the incel community, where young males are being brainwashed by misogyny and then turned towards the drag she/males for sex. There are psychologists very concerned about this.

 

There is an interesting pattern in the transexual population. You tend to find the main categories are these.

1.Older men 37 years or older, drag, crossdresser, tend to take hormones for large breasts but keep their penis (98% of these keep their penis).

2. Younger women, 12-19 years, who have hysterectomies and mastectomies.

 

It is far less common for men under 30 and women over 2O to become transgendered. If they do the women are less likely to have surgery and the men more likely to have surgery.

 

If it were a natural condition there would not be such variation and only according to SEXUAL AROUSAL states. Also it would not require massive and continued hormones to maintain the change. The body of the individual keeps fighting against the changes made. It is were natural that would not happen.

 

I have nothing against any individual, even if they are trans, I think you should judge people by their behaviour, but the movement itself is extremely harmful and there are agendas behind it as a group.

 

Also it's not good that certain 'talking heads' misogynists and racists have hijacked the situation pretending they are on the side of women's right just to build their platform and monetize the suffering of people.

Transgenderism at it's worse is baseline pedophilia when children are concerned. This is one of the fundamental parts of the transgender movement that is out right unlawful and inhumane. People need to realise that it is okay to be who you want to be but behaviour has to be considered and when things go left, you have to take action and make right the things that are wrong and left. These people are being promoted because of the demonization of the human mind in society and it's completely wrong. The movement is not sustainable for humanity at all and completely destroys the minds of children who follow it, it should be banned out right completely and made illegal for under age people to see anything to do with transgenderism. Even more so with the sterlization of children and hormone change amongst the young, it needs to be illegal because it ruins lives and impacts them for the worst.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Connor Wiseman said:

Transgenderism at it's worse is baseline pedophilia when children are concerned. This is one of the fundamental parts of the transgender movement that is out right unlawful and inhumane. People need to realise that it is okay to be who you want to be but behaviour has to be considered and when things go left, you have to take action and make right the things that are wrong and left. These people are being promoted because of the demonization of the human mind in society and it's completely wrong. The movement is not sustainable for humanity at all and completely destroys the minds of children who follow it, it should be banned out right completely and made illegal for under age people to see anything to do with transgenderism. Even more so with the sterlization of children and hormone change amongst the young, it needs to be illegal because it ruins lives and impacts them for the worst.

I was agreeing with you.

 

That is why I recommended you read the investigative journalist blog by Jennifer Bilek, she is saying the same things you are saying and she has exposed who is really behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Connor Wiseman said:

Transgenderism at it's worse is baseline pedophilia when children are concerned. This is one of the fundamental parts of the transgender movement that is out right unlawful and inhumane. People need to realise that it is okay to be who you want to be but behaviour has to be considered and when things go left, you have to take action and make right the things that are wrong and left. These people are being promoted because of the demonization of the human mind in society and it's completely wrong. The movement is not sustainable for humanity at all and completely destroys the minds of children who follow it, it should be banned out right completely and made illegal for under age people to see anything to do with transgenderism. Even more so with the sterlization of children and hormone change amongst the young, it needs to be illegal because it ruins lives and impacts them for the worst.

 

Transgender can start off as mental disorders like body dysmorphia or gender dysphoria and we have to ask why these illnesses are becoming more common. I think there is a wider context where the traditional roles for masculinity and femininity which have kept society going and sustainable for thousands of generations are being degraded and deconstructed under the banners of relativism and personal freedom. Transgender is just the extreme end of a much wider movement to feminise men and masculinise women, damaging our fertility, including through the food supply and making national cultures unsustainable leading to mass immigration.  It's a demographic dead end especially for white westerners. Movements which start off as potentially positive like Feminism and New Man are twisted so we believe masculinity is toxic and femininity is oppression. 

 

So when we look at the wider context, just focusing on the tip of the spear like transgenderism and trying to ban that can lead to accusations of discrimination and hate, which is of course how the whole agenda was constructed. Imo we need compassion for the victims, as we're all victims, and expose the whole degenerate agenda. 

 

Edited by Campion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, RobinJ said:

 Looking outside ourself for that can be a dangerous game, its how we end up with the control matrix of religion, politics and finance.

 

so the 'system' can be described as a matrix of sorts yes but what david is saying is that this entire reality is itself a 'simulation' as he puts it, which is using modern language to describe older gnostic concepts.

 

So this discussion is going on on two levels. We are speaking about the nature of this reality itself and then the games played within this reality

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2024 at 1:19 AM, Phil26 said:

Jesus is the saviour of the New Age movement. 

 

no i think the new age movement says that jesus was the age of pisces and that we are moving into the age of aquarius. It's almost as if they are arguing that jesus is old software that needs to now be replaced....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David does say how to get out of this perception deception in his books, especially in his latest book, "The Dream".  I found that he goes over many wrong things all the while letting us know how we can wake up, but never does David impose his views on us.  I think there is nothing more "positive" and strong than that.

Edited by WaveParticle
grammar fix
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/24/2024 at 12:53 PM, Phil26 said:

Emotional regulation is a big problem. Unfortunately it is encouraged nowadays. People are told they cannot regulate their own emotions without medication. 🙄 It's become normalised to prop up your life with external emotional regulation rather than it being an internal function.

 

I'm not sure about the mothers working having the effect on that though. Typically women, especially in lower classes, have had to work, mills, factories, farming etc. And during WW2 mothers in their millions had to work to replace men who were away at war but we did not see an increase in young adults unable to regulate their emotions or isolating themselves like they do today. It's a bit of a myth that mothers were around the home all day giving attention to their children. It's also more likely to happen since the rise of the middle classes. Wealthy people used nannies and the poor mothers had to work to feed their children. 

 

It could be argued, and has been by psychologists, that the rise of the middle class soccer mom, helicopter parents and took much close management of children has caused them to have problems with emotional regulation. Those children spending too much time with mum or another 'parental' figure looks to the parent as an emotional regulator. Children learn emotional regulation from independence and socialisation with other children. Years ago children went out to play and it was not micromanaged by parents but nowadays 'play dates' are carefully controlled and children have been taught to be afraid to go outside.

 

You are right about birth being a traumatic experience and they intend it to be that way.

 

I have come across something interesting about narcissists and after reading your comment it reminded me. I am finding a pattern that the people who are more aware of what is going on have gone through a period of time where they suddenly realise what narcissism is and they are 'surrounded' by them. This is usually followed by realising how many they have known in their lives and a going no contact with those they currently know followed by a realisation of how pervasive narcissists are at all levels of society including organisations and governments.

 

I think the prison world vs learning lessons can be explained by the fact that we 'divine sparks', as Icke puts it, tend to be happy, optimistic and loving beings. We are completely different to the beings of narcissistic natures. Because of this we tend to look for the positives in a situation, even if that situation is terrible. So we interpret the 'lemons' of a prison world as a way to make lemonade. It doesn't mean that was the intention of the maker of that world, it's just our perspective. Therefore this world can be a prison, but you could feel you are learning lessons here because you're being positive, but the prison doesn't want you to learn anything it just wants you to stay a prisoner.

 

It's like living with narcissists. Narcissists aren't trying to make you a better person, they just want to destroy you. But you learn lessons from seeing them for what they are, once you know this you don't stay around in the hope of more 'lessons,' you get your arse out of there.

It sure is. Those with the loudest voices and incoherent arguments are favoured, as long as it is part of the woke agenda. 

 

Yeah fair point. Maybe we can agree to disagree on that. You raise some good points, and admittedly my theory is based on only my own intuition and personal observations. Although women have often worked and handed over their children to substitute caregivers, this tended to be at older ages than they do now. Children can be handed to kindergartens and nurseries at only months old now. I don't remember that happening in my childhood so there was at least a few years of parent and child bonding. I have a couple of nieces who work in childcare and their stories of how things are, are quite alarming really with a lot of favouritism to 'cute kids' or well behaved kids, and then the opposite to the 'naughty kids' or 'little shits' as they are sometimes called. 

 

Yep, birth has always been made to be traumatic by design. And the impact of birth trauma has been known for a long time now, and yet not much has changed unless parents are 'switched on' to it. 

 

Good observations on the narcissists. I think by nature, narcissists target the empath or sensitive types, and some say they are actually seeking out the 'light' to destroy or feed off. I am coming to the conclusion that particularly the most destructive narcissists are driven by the 'dark side' and are perhaps actually here to dim the light of those who are pure. The other thing is that people who are targeted by the narcissists tend to be those who are naive or at least tend to 'see the good in people', and I would certainly class myself in those camps previously. However, since going through this and a lot of processing, I am no longer naive, and realize quite clearly that there are 'dark' people out there who would destroy a person in an instance if they felt it would benefit them. My ex attempted to do this, succeeded in some ways but failed in others. 'Seeing the good in people' can be as damaging as it is 'good'. 

 

Exactly! This is what happened to me. I was 'too innocent' previously, and a lot was due to unhealed wounds and shadow stuff, particularly lust. Having healed those there is no inroads for these people, and given I am awake to it now, I can see it very clearly. I recently let a friend 'go' because I was feeling the same sorts of feelings; imbalanced input, feeding off my energy and ideas, devaluing, and judgments. Once you 'see it' it is hard to unsee. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2024 at 8:37 PM, Bombadil said:

I find it difficult to comprehend not desiring to be closer to the natural world. Simulation or not. I believe there is a reasonable argument to think that those who feel no pull towards nature are a separate species. We are all taught the beauty and benefit of the "natural" world but the vast majority prefer Love island and posting pictures of the meals. 

Just look at the reaction to the massive rise in prices in the U.K as one example. No protest, no outright rebellion. The system, or whatever you believe is behind all this, has in the most part already achieved it's goals.

Yes, me too. I get a tremendous sense of 'peace' from 'nature' whatever it is. I am fortunate that here in Sydney there are many beaches, or hikes/national parks in which to get away from the madness. A hike can provide the groundedness that would take 5 or 6 meditations. It is always a reset for me to get into nature. 

 

And I think you are right, for many, they are locked into this Matrix' so deep that they cannot be away from it. The more you are locked into it, the less you can see reality of course, or think for yourself. Just earlier I was thinking about how much most people sacrifice of themselves to 'fit in'. They sacrifice large parts of themselves, and hide lots of others away from the World, but there are consequences of that of course. Obviously there are degrees of this, some sacrifice only a little, and others sacrifice a lot to 'fit in'.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

so the 'system' can be described as a matrix of sorts yes but what david is saying is that this entire reality is itself a 'simulation' as he puts it, which is using modern language to describe older gnostic concepts.

 

So this discussion is going on on two levels. We are speaking about the nature of this reality itself and then the games played within this reality

I saw something interesting today re the "simulation" idea which I'm still mulling over as it's something I've not heard anyone else talk about. So the basis was that we do live in a kind of simulation matrix but that we manifest it as a collective. If we think back to covid era, and the majority belief was that it was real and dangerous, and therefore we lived in a twilight world of outside influence until some of us got wise and began to speak out, thereby slowly changing the narrative from fear to hope.

Definitely an interesting concept which actually makes sense when we look at how the quantum field works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Campion said:

 

Transgender can start off as mental disorders like body dysmorphia or gender dysphoria and we have to ask why these illnesses are becoming more common. I think there is a wider context where the traditional roles for masculinity and femininity which have kept society going and sustainable for thousands of generations are being degraded and deconstructed under the banners of relativism and personal freedom. Transgender is just the extreme end of a much wider movement to feminise men and masculinise women, damaging our fertility, including through the food supply and making national cultures unsustainable leading to mass immigration.  It's a demographic dead end especially for white westerners. Movements which start off as potentially positive like Feminism and New Man are twisted so we believe masculinity is toxic and femininity is oppression. 

 

So when we look at the wider context, just focusing on the tip of the spear like transgenderism and trying to ban that can lead to accusations of discrimination and hate, which is of course how the whole agenda was constructed. Imo we need compassion for the victims, as we're all victims, and expose the whole degenerate agenda. 

 

I don't think we should ban people if they really want to be transgender, but there should certainly be bans on anyone under adult age from surgery or hormones. Children don't have the maturity to do that.

 

I also think the traditional roles of men and women are actually feeding into the trans movement. If men and women weren't stereotyped there would be no gender to identify with. Trans people aren't identifying with the sex of male or female, they are identifying with makeup, wearing a dress or shaving their heads and going muscle crazy. Stereotypes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

no i think the new age movement says that jesus was the age of pisces and that we are moving into the age of aquarius. It's almost as if they are arguing that jesus is old software that needs to now be replaced....

The Jesus of the New Age movement is more hippy than the new testament, although he still wears sandals. 😜

 

It's like the Wicca religion, they believe in Jesus as a leader even though they are supposed to be pagan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

It sure is. Those with the loudest voices and incoherent arguments are favoured, as long as it is part of the woke agenda. 

 

Yeah fair point. Maybe we can agree to disagree on that. You raise some good points, and admittedly my theory is based on only my own intuition and personal observations. Although women have often worked and handed over their children to substitute caregivers, this tended to be at older ages than they do now. Children can be handed to kindergartens and nurseries at only months old now. I don't remember that happening in my childhood so there was at least a few years of parent and child bonding. I have a couple of nieces who work in childcare and their stories of how things are, are quite alarming really with a lot of favouritism to 'cute kids' or well behaved kids, and then the opposite to the 'naughty kids' or 'little shits' as they are sometimes called. 

 

Yep, birth has always been made to be traumatic by design. And the impact of birth trauma has been known for a long time now, and yet not much has changed unless parents are 'switched on' to it. 

 

Good observations on the narcissists. I think by nature, narcissists target the empath or sensitive types, and some say they are actually seeking out the 'light' to destroy or feed off. I am coming to the conclusion that particularly the most destructive narcissists are driven by the 'dark side' and are perhaps actually here to dim the light of those who are pure. The other thing is that people who are targeted by the narcissists tend to be those who are naive or at least tend to 'see the good in people', and I would certainly class myself in those camps previously. However, since going through this and a lot of processing, I am no longer naive, and realize quite clearly that there are 'dark' people out there who would destroy a person in an instance if they felt it would benefit them. My ex attempted to do this, succeeded in some ways but failed in others. 'Seeing the good in people' can be as damaging as it is 'good'. 

 

Exactly! This is what happened to me. I was 'too innocent' previously, and a lot was due to unhealed wounds and shadow stuff, particularly lust. Having healed those there is no inroads for these people, and given I am awake to it now, I can see it very clearly. I recently let a friend 'go' because I was feeling the same sorts of feelings; imbalanced input, feeding off my energy and ideas, devaluing, and judgments. Once you 'see it' it is hard to unsee. 

Children shouldn't be going into preschool. It's just starting the programming earlier, which is of course why it has been normallised.

 

Ideally children should have at least one care giver at home, this should be Mum or Dad. It's a shame that more people don't have that. Also that women are disadvantaged if they stay at home. They are not appreciated, 1 in 3 will suffer violence from a partner (but cannot leave as they don't have their own money) and they don't have a pension. More should be done for women, and men, if they choose to stay at home for their children.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, RobinJ said:

I saw something interesting today re the "simulation" idea which I'm still mulling over as it's something I've not heard anyone else talk about. So the basis was that we do live in a kind of simulation matrix but that we manifest it as a collective. If we think back to covid era, and the majority belief was that it was real and dangerous, and therefore we lived in a twilight world of outside influence until some of us got wise and began to speak out, thereby slowly changing the narrative from fear to hope.

Definitely an interesting concept which actually makes sense when we look at how the quantum field works.

David Icke writes that the simulation is run by AI, which it is, but that it uses our creative energy. 

 

It's a misnomer to label something a "collective" just because a group of people contribute to it. We contribute to this world as individuals. Each playing a part in the 'game' AI, and those behind it, have set into being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, RobinJ said:

I saw something interesting today re the "simulation" idea which I'm still mulling over as it's something I've not heard anyone else talk about. So the basis was that we do live in a kind of simulation matrix but that we manifest it as a collective. If we think back to covid era, and the majority belief was that it was real and dangerous, and therefore we lived in a twilight world of outside influence until some of us got wise and began to speak out, thereby slowly changing the narrative from fear to hope.

Definitely an interesting concept which actually makes sense when we look at how the quantum field works.

I am pretty sure that Jason Breshears from Achaix has a similar theory of what the simulation is. I have learnt a lot from his work thus far. I don't agree with him blindly but I like his work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Phil26 said:

I don't think we should ban people if they really want to be transgender, but there should certainly be bans on anyone under adult age from surgery or hormones. Children don't have the maturity to do that.

 

I agree, although if there's an underlying mental health issue it should be addressed first. Nearly all children have a hard time going through puberty and finding out their true adult self anyway.   

 

5 hours ago, Phil26 said:

I also think the traditional roles of men and women are actually feeding into the trans movement. If men and women weren't stereotyped there would be no gender to identify with. Trans people aren't identifying with the sex of male or female, they are identifying with makeup, wearing a dress or shaving their heads and going muscle crazy. Stereotypes.

 

But why now? Those traditional roles have been around for ever, since before humans evolved even. As far as I can see, a certain amount of gender bending existed historically, and in other cultures too, we can look at how males & females were portrayed in the western theatre tradition or ladyboys in the far east for example. However the whole thing has been ramped up to a much higher level at the same time as our culture is experiencing an existential threat due to infertility and I don't think it's a coincidence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Phil26 said:

David Icke writes that the simulation is run by AI, which it is, but that it uses our creative energy. 

 

It's a misnomer to label something a "collective" just because a group of people contribute to it. We contribute to this world as individuals. Each playing a part in the 'game' AI, and those behind it, have set into being.

You don't know fir a fact what Icke says is THE truth. Its simply his version based on his experiences. When so much is unfolding that has been hidden for centuries (in some cases) then the best we can do is remain flexible. Wasn't that long ago that folks thought science was right about everything.

Blanket dogma of belief is what put us in this mess. 

I'm happy for you if you feel his work is the new bible for your belief system.

Perhaps tell us of your personal experiences and why you think it is the only truth out there.

At the moment all I see from your comments is the need to feel like you are right and others are wrong if they don't agree.

It takes significant internal work to be rid of programing of that type, I know, because I've lived it.

Most if our programming comes up to age 7 (science calls it imprinting). The vast majority carry stuff we aren't even aware of.

Dr Espen explains it well here: https://youtu.be/wo7KM7ooju0?si=vKjBONRkK-qn0Oyh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Campion said:

although if there's an underlying mental health issue it should be addressed first.

This mental health issue is rampant nowadays because of daily ritual the masses are participating in the form of smartphone, media, entertainment, film&music. Learn about the symbolism and occult content. Masses including muslims and christians who watches music video or film, they are being sent to Hell and eaten while alive hence loss of soul and resulting in metal health issues such as depression, addiction, anxiety as well as physical illness etc.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RobinJ said:

You don't know fir a fact what Icke says is THE truth. Its simply his version based on his experiences. When so much is unfolding that has been hidden for centuries (in some cases) then the best we can do is remain flexible. Wasn't that long ago that folks thought science was right about everything.

Blanket dogma of belief is what put us in this mess. 

I'm happy for you if you feel his work is the new bible for your belief system.

Perhaps tell us of your personal experiences and why you think it is the only truth out there.

At the moment all I see from your comments is the need to feel like you are right and others are wrong if they don't agree.

It takes significant internal work to be rid of programing of that type, I know, because I've lived it.

Most if our programming comes up to age 7 (science calls it imprinting). The vast majority carry stuff we aren't even aware of.

Dr Espen explains it well here: https://youtu.be/wo7KM7ooju0?si=vKjBONRkK-qn0Oyh

I'm not sure why you're so defensive about Icke. What do you think of his most recent books for example?

 

Anyone can see this world is full of corruption and that those in authority are pushing the AI technological control of the masses. If you don't think that is happening what exactly do you think is behind the global moves for AI control, transhumanism, cashless society (using your hand to pay in stores for example), facial recognition, increased police powers, social credit scoring and human brain integration with technology including implants to make people experience augmented reality 24/7. Add to that the mass migration forced on people, transgender/ transhumanism movement and other obvious moves by the elite, explain what you think their plan is? Why are they using AI to achieve it? And why you think it's not dangerous and actually evil. Are you okay with the Great Reset? All of that is actually happening already. Why do you doubt that?

 

Also you have dismissed many people's experiences of the astral etc. that actually validates what Icke has been telling people for decades.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Campion said:

 

I agree, although if there's an underlying mental health issue it should be addressed first. Nearly all children have a hard time going through puberty and finding out their true adult self anyway.   

 

 

But why now? Those traditional roles have been around for ever, since before humans evolved even. As far as I can see, a certain amount of gender bending existed historically, and in other cultures too, we can look at how males & females were portrayed in the western theatre tradition or ladyboys in the far east for example. However the whole thing has been ramped up to a much higher level at the same time as our culture is experiencing an existential threat due to infertility and I don't think it's a coincidence. 

They exploit the normal feelings teens have to convince them they are transgender.

 

Could you explain more about how you think transgenderism is connected to infertility? I think I understand what you are saying but does that go beyond the way hormones are being manipulated?

 

They want several things to change in humans.

 

No need to sleep. A fully integrated brain to AI interface.

No need to eat. No digestive system.

No need to have sex. No sexual organs

No reproduction.

No 'physical' death.

At that point the human will no longer exist and what traps it's consciousness, the 'body' will prevent it from ever leaving this world.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, DaleP said:

This mental health issue is rampant nowadays because of daily ritual the masses are participating in the form of smartphone, media, entertainment, film&music. Learn about the symbolism and occult content. Masses including muslims and christians who watches music video or film, they are being sent to Hell and eaten while alive hence loss of soul and resulting in metal health issues such as depression, addiction, anxiety as well as physical illness etc.

 

Addiction has been normalised. Mental illness is assumed to be a natural part of life and unfortunately people are agreeing with it and convincing themselves it is normal when it is not.

People have stopped taking responsibility for themselves and they lean on therapists, life coaches and the new age guru culture to give them all the answers and easy ways to feel good.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2024 at 11:05 PM, Phil26 said:

I was agreeing with you.

 

That is why I recommended you read the investigative journalist blog by Jennifer Bilek, she is saying the same things you are saying and she has exposed who is really behind it.

Can you post the link to the blog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/26/2024 at 10:15 AM, Campion said:

 

Transgender can start off as mental disorders like body dysmorphia or gender dysphoria and we have to ask why these illnesses are becoming more common. I think there is a wider context where the traditional roles for masculinity and femininity which have kept society going and sustainable for thousands of generations are being degraded and deconstructed under the banners of relativism and personal freedom. Transgender is just the extreme end of a much wider movement to feminise men and masculinise women, damaging our fertility, including through the food supply and making national cultures unsustainable leading to mass immigration.  It's a demographic dead end especially for white westerners. Movements which start off as potentially positive like Feminism and New Man are twisted so we believe masculinity is toxic and femininity is oppression. 

 

So when we look at the wider context, just focusing on the tip of the spear like transgenderism and trying to ban that can lead to accusations of discrimination and hate, which is of course how the whole agenda was constructed. Imo we need compassion for the victims, as we're all victims, and expose the whole degenerate agenda. 

 

They are not illnesses they are insecurities in the people who have these so called illnesses. Insecurities that are most likely caused by social stigmas and depression etc, they are just another way to promote the agenda, like you say to weaponise feminism and masculinity. People need to be taught that it's okay to feel good in your own body and that it is bad to want to feel like the opposite sex. Its not a mental illness its a form of curiosity and wonder that is being used by the state and government to push the agenda. Transgenderism is a very dangerous tool that is being used to alter the way society operates and the morals that are bounded to society, if we start accepting men and women and women as men then there are no boundaries anymore and it becomes ruthlessly unsustainable, even more so when you consider hormone therapy and anything else that is suppose to vindicate upon the nature of being normal and heterosexual. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Phil26 said:

They exploit the normal feelings teens have to convince them they are transgender.

 

Could you explain more about how you think transgenderism is connected to infertility? I think I understand what you are saying but does that go beyond the way hormones are being manipulated?

 

They want several things to change in humans.

 

No need to sleep. A fully integrated brain to AI interface.

No need to eat. No digestive system.

No need to have sex. No sexual organs

No reproduction.

No 'physical' death.

 

^ This is all going against what is considered natural,

 

At that point the human will no longer exist and what traps it's consciousness, the 'body' will prevent it from ever leaving this world.

 

It is already programmed in this way unless you know what to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Phil26 said:

David Icke writes that the simulation is run by AI, which it is, but that it uses our creative energy. 

 

It's because 'they' don't have creative energy.

As above post, no reproduction, no creative energy.

 

So if you don't have a talent to decorate a house, you'd employ someone who can do it....right? Same thing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...