Jump to content

Conflict in Israel 2023


Mr H

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Hamas don't care about the Palestinian people, Hamas are using innocent people as human shields, a disgusting tactic to gamble with their own peoples lives, use innocents as collateral damage in their military operations.

 

Anyway, I wondered where Hamas stronghold was now and found out that Rafah is their last stronghold and that the Palestinians are going to Rafah, to be used as human shields and sacrificed where necessary by Hamas, when in fact there are corridors they could use to escape the fighting. 

 

Instead, they all flock to Rafah.

 

I think the Palestinians are being forced into Rafah for Hamas to sacrifice them and pile on international pressure.

 

Here's an article I found.

 

Hamas stronghold in Gaza's Rafah is key to its survival - analysis

 

For Hamas, holding on to Rafah is a key to continuing to rule Gaza.

 

Hamas has been defeated in many parts of the Gaza strip. This is particularly true in terms of Hamas battalions, the organizational tactical level unit that it has used to control areas in Gaza. Of 24 Hamas battalions, it is believed more than 18 have been defeated or destroyed.

However, Hamas continues to rule in Rafah, a key area on the Egyptian border where it controls humanitarian aid that enters Gaza.

 

For Hamas the control of Rafah is of the utmost importance. It wants to have a stranglehold on aid and also control other types of items, such as smuggled goods or arms stockpiles, which Egypt sought to stop.

 

The region is now awaiting the likelihood of a struggle for Rafah. Al-Ain media in the UAE reported on February 7 that Israel has made preparations for operations in Rafah and asks, “Has the countdown begun?” The report said “Fears have been increasing for several days about an Israeli attack.”

 

Al-Jazeera in Qatar, where key Hamas leaders live, also reported that the UN has said “everything possible” must be done to avoid an Israeli attack on Rafah. The New Arab, an online media outlet, said that Egypt has warned that Israeli moves there could jeopardize the peace 

 

For some commentators, the humanitarian issue of overcrowding in the city by Gazans who fled fighting elsewhere is very important. However, it’s not clear why so many people fled to Rafah when they could also go to the humanitarian zone in Gaza near the coast, called Al-Mawasi. Hamas benefits from having a large number of internally displaced people in Rafah that it can use as human shields.

 

Hamas wants to survive, having lost control of other areas in Gaza. It has tried to infiltrate gunmen into northern Gaza and has also sought to maintain civil control in the north. However, when it comes to its actual terrorist units, it has suffered many losses.  

 

Even as it loses ground, its demands for a hostage deal have grown. It wants an extended ceasefire and a three-phase release of hostages in return for prisoners in Israel, followed by an end to the war. It has demanded an end to Israeli surveillance, more aid and more support for reconstruction.
This has been the Hamas plan all along. It wanted to hide for a few months and watch as international pressure built up on Israel, and then re-emerge as it has done after previous wars in 2009, 2012, 2014, and 2021.

 

For Hamas, holding on to Rafah is key. It needs to control humanitarian aid because this is how it controls the people of Gaza.

 

It has worked over the years to create a symbiotic partnership with international organizations, so that it is able to build tunnels and store weapons throughout Gaza and it outsources much of the aid work aboveground to internationals. In this way Hamas benefits and the international organizations also benefit because they get to claim they are responsible for helping people.

 

The article reveals more of this trend of Hamas being portrayed in a positive light by international organizations that work with and rely on it. “Hamas administrators and police maintain firm control of the south, where much of the population is concentrated, though civil order is breaking down in central regions,” the article notes. A “senior humanitarian official” told The Guardian that “You still see Hamas police in different areas who have a grip to some extent on law and order in some places, including in the north.” Hamas, which launched a war on Israel and has brought destruction on Gaza and runs it as an authoritarian state is portrayed as “law and order.” It’s clear the international organizations have a preference for Hamas rule.
 

The article goes on to note that “aid agencies trying to distribute food, fuel and other essentials to the displaced in southern Gaza continue to deal with Hamas-appointed officials. Hamas still provides police escorts for convoys.” Another international organization member of the International Committee of the Red Cross in Gaza is quoted as saying “there is a generalized breakdown of law and order. Criminality overall is increasing.” Note here, that Hamas which holds hostages in tunnels underground is not described as “criminality,” rather it is other Gazans.


Hamas is often praised in these Guardian accounts for providing “aid convoys” with “armed escorts.” One quote notes “aid convoys are receiving armed escorts. It is unclear if these are Hamas police, who are still present and visible, or private security companies. There is a fine line between where one starts and the other stops.”


The portrayal here of Hamas as the “law and order” in Gaza and the positive spin it receives for putting armed men in charge of humanitarian aid is key to understanding how the Hamas stranglehold on Rafah keeps it in power. Hamas must control the spigot to continue working with various international organizations. Hamas and these organizations have become mutually dependent. The Hamas one-party terror state lets the agencies  operate and in return, like a mafia selling protection, they put armed men around humanitarian aid convoys.
 

 

Basically, Islam, the religion of peace, is sacrificing its own innocent people for its depraved ideology against the Jews.

 

I'm sure we all know about the Pig's and Dogs in the Koran.

 

Hamas is a disgusting organisation and it doesn't surprise me the leaders live in other countries so that it's not their own families that get killed in their ideological war.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why Is the Liberal Media Inciting Genocide?

Israelis and Ukrainians are the only "right-wing extremist Nazis." But the liberal Establishment loves them. Why?

9 Dec 2023

In case you hadn’t noticed, the liberal media, and the liberal Establishment behind it, hates “right-wing extremists.” Since 2016, when Trump was elected on a control-the-borders platform, “right-wing extremism” has replaced “Islamic terrorism” as the new bogeyman. Don’t like mandatory vaccines and COVID lockdowns? You’re a “right-wing extremist” and deserve to be censored. Don’t like censorship? You’re defending “right-wing extremists” so you must be one yourself. Don’t like the war on Russia? You must be a “right-wing extremist” like Putin, who is the new Hitler because he doesn’t like LGBTQ indoctrination and mandatory sex change surgery for toddlers.

In the past, being antiwar, pro-free-speech, pro-civil-liberties, and pro-alternative-medicine put you on the left side of the spectrum. Now those are all signs of “right-wing extremism.”

What’s so terrible about all this “right-wing extremism”? Ultimately, it’s all about the Nazis. If you are pro-free-speech, you’re giving a platform to Nazis. If you support the COVID dissidents, you must like that one guy with the swastika tattoo at the rally where RFK Jr. spoke. And if you don’t support the war on Russia, and refuse to click your heels and sig heil for Zelensky, it must be because you are a follower of the new Hitler, Vladimir Putin.

The logic goes something like this: Right-wing extremists are Nazis. Nazis, as we all know, commit genocide. Therefore if we allow extremists to support border control, oppose war on Russia, speak their minds without censorship, and practice alternative medicine instead of masking and jabbing, one thing will lead to another and pretty soon they’ll be committing genocide.

You might say it’s the new domino theory.

What makes the whole thing even crazier is that there are really only two places on Earth where “right-wing extremist Nazis” are committing genocide: Israel under fuhrer Netanyahu, and Ukraine under fuhrer Zelenksy. But the liberal media, despite its ostensible hatred of right-wing extremist Nazis, supports both genocides! Zelinsky’s effort to murder and expel the Russian-speaking people of Eastern Ukraine, and obliterate the culture of any who remain, is a textbook case of genocide, and a direct descendant of Hitler’s lebensraum project with its planned murder and expulsion of millions of Slavs. And Netanyahu’s even bloodier attempt to murder and expel the Palestinians is orders of magnitude worse—probably worse than anything Hitler ever did.

Both Zelensky’s Ukraine and Netanyahu’s Israel are fanatical right-wing ultra-nationalist regimes, built on exaltation of a “master race” (Ukrainians/Jews in one case, and just plain Jews in the other) and the genocidal demonization of the untermenschen (Russian-speaking Christians in Ukraine, Palestinians in Palestine). These two regimes are the apotheosis of everything pro-tolerance, anti-racist, pro-multiculturalism liberals profess to hate. And yet the liberal Establishment loves them, and even runs nonstop pro-genocide propaganda on their behalf. Whatever can those liberals be thinking?

The Cosmopolitan Empire

When we peel back the veneer of increasingly threadbare liberalism, we find that the so-called liberal Establishment isn’t very liberal at all. Its real roots are in Trotskyism and illuminism, not classical Enlightenment liberalism, and its end-game is totalitarian global dictatorship. That, at least, is the argument of Peter Myers’ new book The Cosmopolitan Empire.

The way Myers tells it, since the Enlightenment exploded into the French Revolution, non-conservative forces have basically been divided into two camps. The first camp, the reformists, includes classical liberals, democratic socialists, moderate libertarians, and others seeking gradual, peaceful change. The second camp consists of nihilists, meaning those who seek a clean break with the current order via creative destruction so they can build a global dictatorship on the ruins. Myers traces this group from the Illuminati of Adam Weishaupt through Marxian communism and finally to the neo-Trotskyism that he sees as the real animating force behind today’s pseudo-liberal Establishment.

 

 

To his credit, Myers is not afraid of mentioning the elephant in the room: the Jewish connection to the nihilist camp. If Jews have traditionally scorned the goyim societies that hosted them, and occasionally sought to undermine those societies, it seems natural that some would participate in, or even lead, modern movements that sought to destroy traditional societies in service to a utopian vision not unlike the one that has long inspired the many flavors of Jewish messianic millenarianism. That utopian vision posits a Messiah who conquers the world and subjugates the goyim to the Jews, making the world a paradise for Jews, each of whom will own 2800 goyim slaves.

Ostensibly secular nihilist radicals, from Weishaupt to Lenin and Trotsky to H.G. Wells and George Soros, have led disproportionately secular-Jewish movements to destroy traditional religions and cultures in order to create a world state, meaning a technocratic global dictatorship ruled by a privileged elite. This one-world project, not classical liberalism, appears to be the driving force behind today’s Establishment. And that is why the “liberal” establishment supports genocidal uber-nationalists in Ukraine and Occupied Palestine. The Ukrainian Nazis (financed by Jewish oligarchs) have been weaponized against the rebirth of Russia, with its patriotism and Orthodox religion and family values; while the Zio-Nazis have been weaponized against traditional Islamicate civilization.

The faux-liberal Establishment propagandizes for such genocides and bloodbaths not because its highest value is individual freedom and dignity, as classical liberalism would have it, but because its liberal bromides are just a smokescreen for a totalitarian world domination project. In other words, it isn’t the “freedom” of two-year-olds to have their genders re-assigned that motivates them. Instead, the faux-liberals are waging war on the traditional family, the basis of organic traditional social life, because it stands in the way of their totalitarian world state. Likewise they hate Putin not because he disapproves of rainbow flags, but because he is rallying Russia to stand as a sovereign Christian-Muslim nation against impending global dictatorship.

Myers’ schema helps explain why so many atheist Jews have “transitioned” from Trotskyite to neoconservative. Max Shpak wrote:

Perhaps even more significant a factor in the origins of neoconservatism was the emergence of an independent Israeli state. While many Jewish Marxists eagerly supported the Zionist state, the more intellectually consistent Left opposed Zionism on the grounds that all nationalisms, including Jewish ones, are enemies of global proletarian revolution. Thus, Jewish leftists who once advocated internationalism for gentile nations were forced to come to terms with the implications of this ideology for their own nationalist sentiments. Thus, they needed an ideology which would let them have their cake (opposing gentile nationalism) and eat it too (by supporting Israel), and they found just such a worldview with neoconservatism.

The neocons have inherited Trotsky’s project of destroying the nations, and the religions and families on which they are based, in hopes that utopia will emerge from the rubble. By posing as liberals — as in Kagan’s veiled call for Trump’s assassination on the pretext that Trump threatens liberal democracy — the neocons have succeeded in remaking what passes for liberalism in their own image.

No wonder today’s “liberalism” is totalitarian and genocidal.

https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/why-is-the-liberal-media-inciting

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, pi3141 said:

I think the Palestinians are being forced into Rafah for Hamas to sacrifice them and pile on international pressure.

 

I got to add, when you consider what Hamas did on Oct 7th, its not really surprising.

 

Those men raped babies, they even raped dead babies, there's probably a name for that but its to sickening I don't even want to know.

 

But raping babies is Paedophilia.

 

Raping dead bodies is necrophilia.

 

Raping dead babies I don't even want to know.

 

Then parading video's of it on their social media. These people are sick.

 

Any man that continues to serve in an organization that either ordered the use of paedophilia as an act of war, or an organization who employs men who are capable of that, and continues to have them i the organization, is sick beyond words, as are the 'men' that carried out the disgusting acts.

 

Anyone who supports Hamas is basically supporting the use of Paedophilia as a Weapon or Political Protest (we're oppressed so we have the right to rape your babies - thats political protest). 

 

Any man who can carry out the order to rape a baby, and film themselves doing it to be paraded on social media is just sick beyond any description.

 

I wouldn't even call them a man and certainly wouldn't call them a religious man.

 

So Hamas, using their own people as a human shields, yeah, I believe they would. These people rape and then behead babies and parade it on video. They have no morals, the Palestinians are pawns in their cause, they will force them into where they want them, use them as human shields, watch them die, and hope to cause an uproar that perhaps stars a bigger war to further their cause.

 

The poor Palestinians. Many innocents will die because Hamas has taken this action.

 

But I don't think Israel has any choice they have to respond when facing such sickening ideology.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Macnamara said:

Why Is the Liberal Media Inciting Genocide?

Israelis and Ukrainians are the only "right-wing extremist Nazis." But the liberal Establishment loves them. Why?

9 Dec 2023

In case you hadn’t noticed, the liberal media, and the liberal Establishment behind it, hates “right-wing extremists.” Since 2016, when Trump was elected on a control-the-borders platform, “right-wing extremism” has replaced “Islamic terrorism” as the new bogeyman. Don’t like mandatory vaccines and COVID lockdowns? You’re a “right-wing extremist” and deserve to be censored. Don’t like censorship? You’re defending “right-wing extremists” so you must be one yourself. Don’t like the war on Russia? You must be a “right-wing extremist” like Putin, who is the new Hitler because he doesn’t like LGBTQ indoctrination and mandatory sex change surgery for toddlers.

In the past, being antiwar, pro-free-speech, pro-civil-liberties, and pro-alternative-medicine put you on the left side of the spectrum. Now those are all signs of “right-wing extremism.”

What’s so terrible about all this “right-wing extremism”? Ultimately, it’s all about the Nazis. If you are pro-free-speech, you’re giving a platform to Nazis. If you support the COVID dissidents, you must like that one guy with the swastika tattoo at the rally where RFK Jr. spoke. And if you don’t support the war on Russia, and refuse to click your heels and sig heil for Zelensky, it must be because you are a follower of the new Hitler, Vladimir Putin.

The logic goes something like this: Right-wing extremists are Nazis. Nazis, as we all know, commit genocide. Therefore if we allow extremists to support border control, oppose war on Russia, speak their minds without censorship, and practice alternative medicine instead of masking and jabbing, one thing will lead to another and pretty soon they’ll be committing genocide.

You might say it’s the new domino theory.

What makes the whole thing even crazier is that there are really only two places on Earth where “right-wing extremist Nazis” are committing genocide: Israel under fuhrer Netanyahu, and Ukraine under fuhrer Zelenksy. But the liberal media, despite its ostensible hatred of right-wing extremist Nazis, supports both genocides! Zelinsky’s effort to murder and expel the Russian-speaking people of Eastern Ukraine, and obliterate the culture of any who remain, is a textbook case of genocide, and a direct descendant of Hitler’s lebensraum project with its planned murder and expulsion of millions of Slavs. And Netanyahu’s even bloodier attempt to murder and expel the Palestinians is orders of magnitude worse—probably worse than anything Hitler ever did.

Both Zelensky’s Ukraine and Netanyahu’s Israel are fanatical right-wing ultra-nationalist regimes, built on exaltation of a “master race” (Ukrainians/Jews in one case, and just plain Jews in the other) and the genocidal demonization of the untermenschen (Russian-speaking Christians in Ukraine, Palestinians in Palestine). These two regimes are the apotheosis of everything pro-tolerance, anti-racist, pro-multiculturalism liberals profess to hate. And yet the liberal Establishment loves them, and even runs nonstop pro-genocide propaganda on their behalf. Whatever can those liberals be thinking?

The Cosmopolitan Empire

When we peel back the veneer of increasingly threadbare liberalism, we find that the so-called liberal Establishment isn’t very liberal at all. Its real roots are in Trotskyism and illuminism, not classical Enlightenment liberalism, and its end-game is totalitarian global dictatorship. That, at least, is the argument of Peter Myers’ new book The Cosmopolitan Empire.

The way Myers tells it, since the Enlightenment exploded into the French Revolution, non-conservative forces have basically been divided into two camps. The first camp, the reformists, includes classical liberals, democratic socialists, moderate libertarians, and others seeking gradual, peaceful change. The second camp consists of nihilists, meaning those who seek a clean break with the current order via creative destruction so they can build a global dictatorship on the ruins. Myers traces this group from the Illuminati of Adam Weishaupt through Marxian communism and finally to the neo-Trotskyism that he sees as the real animating force behind today’s pseudo-liberal Establishment.

 

 

To his credit, Myers is not afraid of mentioning the elephant in the room: the Jewish connection to the nihilist camp. If Jews have traditionally scorned the goyim societies that hosted them, and occasionally sought to undermine those societies, it seems natural that some would participate in, or even lead, modern movements that sought to destroy traditional societies in service to a utopian vision not unlike the one that has long inspired the many flavors of Jewish messianic millenarianism. That utopian vision posits a Messiah who conquers the world and subjugates the goyim to the Jews, making the world a paradise for Jews, each of whom will own 2800 goyim slaves.

Ostensibly secular nihilist radicals, from Weishaupt to Lenin and Trotsky to H.G. Wells and George Soros, have led disproportionately secular-Jewish movements to destroy traditional religions and cultures in order to create a world state, meaning a technocratic global dictatorship ruled by a privileged elite. This one-world project, not classical liberalism, appears to be the driving force behind today’s Establishment. And that is why the “liberal” establishment supports genocidal uber-nationalists in Ukraine and Occupied Palestine. The Ukrainian Nazis (financed by Jewish oligarchs) have been weaponized against the rebirth of Russia, with its patriotism and Orthodox religion and family values; while the Zio-Nazis have been weaponized against traditional Islamicate civilization.

The faux-liberal Establishment propagandizes for such genocides and bloodbaths not because its highest value is individual freedom and dignity, as classical liberalism would have it, but because its liberal bromides are just a smokescreen for a totalitarian world domination project. In other words, it isn’t the “freedom” of two-year-olds to have their genders re-assigned that motivates them. Instead, the faux-liberals are waging war on the traditional family, the basis of organic traditional social life, because it stands in the way of their totalitarian world state. Likewise they hate Putin not because he disapproves of rainbow flags, but because he is rallying Russia to stand as a sovereign Christian-Muslim nation against impending global dictatorship.

Myers’ schema helps explain why so many atheist Jews have “transitioned” from Trotskyite to neoconservative. Max Shpak wrote:

Perhaps even more significant a factor in the origins of neoconservatism was the emergence of an independent Israeli state. While many Jewish Marxists eagerly supported the Zionist state, the more intellectually consistent Left opposed Zionism on the grounds that all nationalisms, including Jewish ones, are enemies of global proletarian revolution. Thus, Jewish leftists who once advocated internationalism for gentile nations were forced to come to terms with the implications of this ideology for their own nationalist sentiments. Thus, they needed an ideology which would let them have their cake (opposing gentile nationalism) and eat it too (by supporting Israel), and they found just such a worldview with neoconservatism.

The neocons have inherited Trotsky’s project of destroying the nations, and the religions and families on which they are based, in hopes that utopia will emerge from the rubble. By posing as liberals — as in Kagan’s veiled call for Trump’s assassination on the pretext that Trump threatens liberal democracy — the neocons have succeeded in remaking what passes for liberalism in their own image.

No wonder today’s “liberalism” is totalitarian and genocidal.

https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/why-is-the-liberal-media-inciting

 

 

So whats he trying to say Mac, the Jewish babies deserved to be raped by Muslim paedophiles because the Jews themselves are genocidal?

 

So would you say paedophilia is acceptable under certain ideological positions?

 

Could you rape a baby if you was ordered to by your superiors?

 

Does the idea of a Muslim man raping a baby and then beheading it not disgust you beyond words? 

 

Do you think any baby deserves to be raped, for any reason, and do you accept that its ok for men to rape babies under certain circumstances?

 

I'd like to know where you stand on that cos it seems like your saying the Islamicate Civilization is a peaceful, moral nation, and yet we see them raping babies. 

 

At least the article argues the Islamicate is just a traditional civilization - does that tradition include paedophilia?

 

So in my book they are not innocent, and paedophilia is never permitted, and I cannot imagine the sort of man that could go through with that, whatever the circumstances.

 

And I cannot imagine the sort of man that would support that, under any circumstances, maybe you have a lower moral bar than me, or can think of an intellectual justification - do share if you can. But for me I'm clear, paedophilia is the most disgusting and immoral thing a man can do. 

 

So I cannot imagine a nation Muslim state of Palestine that had used paedophilia as a weapon, and celebrated it, actually being any more moral than the Jews, can you?

 

If you support a load of paedophile supremacist Muslims running a state, then I don't know what sort of Hell on Earth you want to bring on.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

‘Screams Without Words’: How Hamas Weaponized Sexual Violence on Oct. 7
A Times investigation uncovered new details showing a pattern of rape, mutilation and extreme brutality against women in the attacks on Israel.

 

Link - https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/28/world/middleeast/oct-7-attacks-hamas-israel-sexual-violence.html

 

 

Hamas1.jpg

Hamas2.jpg

 

 

I hope the actions of Hamas on October 7th are enough to make every Muslim ashamed to be associated with Islam and denounce their faith as quickly as possible.

 

And I hope to God that a bunch of crazed and depraved Muslims paedophiles do not get legitimate control of a country.

 

To imagine, men like that sitting at the UN or any other legal institute.

 

Sickening.

 

To think any Muslim would support these actions and claim them to be morally right or justifiable by scripture, Gods law, is sick.

 

 

 

Edited by pi3141
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DECEMBER 7, 2023

 

The Same Extremists Target Both Muslims and Jews


Far-right extremists shifted their online hate from Muslims to Jews in 2017, and offline hate followed the same trends 

BY WILL HOBBS & NAZITA LAJEVARDI

 

Contemporary discourse often pits Muslims and Jews against one another. But our research demonstrates that a large amount of seemingly disconnected hateful rhetoric about both—at least in 2017—originated from the same far-right extremist communities. We urge observers, researchers and leaders to investigate the traces and origins of the hate targeting both groups today, and to consider the potential outsized role that extremist communities may be playing in stoking hatred against Muslims and Jews today.

 

This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

 

Link - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-same-extremists-target-both-muslims-and-jews/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Macnamara said:

Why Is the Liberal Media Inciting Genocide?

Israelis and Ukrainians are the only "right-wing extremist Nazis." But the liberal Establishment loves them. Why?

9 Dec 2023

In case you hadn’t noticed, the liberal media, and the liberal Establishment behind it, hates “right-wing extremists.” Since 2016, when Trump was elected on a control-the-borders platform, “right-wing extremism” has replaced “Islamic terrorism” as the new bogeyman. Don’t like mandatory vaccines and COVID lockdowns? You’re a “right-wing extremist” and deserve to be censored. Don’t like censorship? You’re defending “right-wing extremists” so you must be one yourself. Don’t like the war on Russia? You must be a “right-wing extremist” like Putin, who is the new Hitler because he doesn’t like LGBTQ indoctrination and mandatory sex change surgery for toddlers.

In the past, being antiwar, pro-free-speech, pro-civil-liberties, and pro-alternative-medicine put you on the left side of the spectrum. Now those are all signs of “right-wing extremism.”

What’s so terrible about all this “right-wing extremism”? Ultimately, it’s all about the Nazis. If you are pro-free-speech, you’re giving a platform to Nazis. If you support the COVID dissidents, you must like that one guy with the swastika tattoo at the rally where RFK Jr. spoke. And if you don’t support the war on Russia, and refuse to click your heels and sig heil for Zelensky, it must be because you are a follower of the new Hitler, Vladimir Putin.

The logic goes something like this: Right-wing extremists are Nazis. Nazis, as we all know, commit genocide. Therefore if we allow extremists to support border control, oppose war on Russia, speak their minds without censorship, and practice alternative medicine instead of masking and jabbing, one thing will lead to another and pretty soon they’ll be committing genocide.

You might say it’s the new domino theory.

What makes the whole thing even crazier is that there are really only two places on Earth where “right-wing extremist Nazis” are committing genocide: Israel under fuhrer Netanyahu, and Ukraine under fuhrer Zelenksy. But the liberal media, despite its ostensible hatred of right-wing extremist Nazis, supports both genocides! Zelinsky’s effort to murder and expel the Russian-speaking people of Eastern Ukraine, and obliterate the culture of any who remain, is a textbook case of genocide, and a direct descendant of Hitler’s lebensraum project with its planned murder and expulsion of millions of Slavs. And Netanyahu’s even bloodier attempt to murder and expel the Palestinians is orders of magnitude worse—probably worse than anything Hitler ever did.

Both Zelensky’s Ukraine and Netanyahu’s Israel are fanatical right-wing ultra-nationalist regimes, built on exaltation of a “master race” (Ukrainians/Jews in one case, and just plain Jews in the other) and the genocidal demonization of the untermenschen (Russian-speaking Christians in Ukraine, Palestinians in Palestine). These two regimes are the apotheosis of everything pro-tolerance, anti-racist, pro-multiculturalism liberals profess to hate. And yet the liberal Establishment loves them, and even runs nonstop pro-genocide propaganda on their behalf. Whatever can those liberals be thinking?

The Cosmopolitan Empire

When we peel back the veneer of increasingly threadbare liberalism, we find that the so-called liberal Establishment isn’t very liberal at all. Its real roots are in Trotskyism and illuminism, not classical Enlightenment liberalism, and its end-game is totalitarian global dictatorship. That, at least, is the argument of Peter Myers’ new book The Cosmopolitan Empire.

The way Myers tells it, since the Enlightenment exploded into the French Revolution, non-conservative forces have basically been divided into two camps. The first camp, the reformists, includes classical liberals, democratic socialists, moderate libertarians, and others seeking gradual, peaceful change. The second camp consists of nihilists, meaning those who seek a clean break with the current order via creative destruction so they can build a global dictatorship on the ruins. Myers traces this group from the Illuminati of Adam Weishaupt through Marxian communism and finally to the neo-Trotskyism that he sees as the real animating force behind today’s pseudo-liberal Establishment.

 

 

To his credit, Myers is not afraid of mentioning the elephant in the room: the Jewish connection to the nihilist camp. If Jews have traditionally scorned the goyim societies that hosted them, and occasionally sought to undermine those societies, it seems natural that some would participate in, or even lead, modern movements that sought to destroy traditional societies in service to a utopian vision not unlike the one that has long inspired the many flavors of Jewish messianic millenarianism. That utopian vision posits a Messiah who conquers the world and subjugates the goyim to the Jews, making the world a paradise for Jews, each of whom will own 2800 goyim slaves.

Ostensibly secular nihilist radicals, from Weishaupt to Lenin and Trotsky to H.G. Wells and George Soros, have led disproportionately secular-Jewish movements to destroy traditional religions and cultures in order to create a world state, meaning a technocratic global dictatorship ruled by a privileged elite. This one-world project, not classical liberalism, appears to be the driving force behind today’s Establishment. And that is why the “liberal” establishment supports genocidal uber-nationalists in Ukraine and Occupied Palestine. The Ukrainian Nazis (financed by Jewish oligarchs) have been weaponized against the rebirth of Russia, with its patriotism and Orthodox religion and family values; while the Zio-Nazis have been weaponized against traditional Islamicate civilization.

The faux-liberal Establishment propagandizes for such genocides and bloodbaths not because its highest value is individual freedom and dignity, as classical liberalism would have it, but because its liberal bromides are just a smokescreen for a totalitarian world domination project. In other words, it isn’t the “freedom” of two-year-olds to have their genders re-assigned that motivates them. Instead, the faux-liberals are waging war on the traditional family, the basis of organic traditional social life, because it stands in the way of their totalitarian world state. Likewise they hate Putin not because he disapproves of rainbow flags, but because he is rallying Russia to stand as a sovereign Christian-Muslim nation against impending global dictatorship.

Myers’ schema helps explain why so many atheist Jews have “transitioned” from Trotskyite to neoconservative. Max Shpak wrote:

Perhaps even more significant a factor in the origins of neoconservatism was the emergence of an independent Israeli state. While many Jewish Marxists eagerly supported the Zionist state, the more intellectually consistent Left opposed Zionism on the grounds that all nationalisms, including Jewish ones, are enemies of global proletarian revolution. Thus, Jewish leftists who once advocated internationalism for gentile nations were forced to come to terms with the implications of this ideology for their own nationalist sentiments. Thus, they needed an ideology which would let them have their cake (opposing gentile nationalism) and eat it too (by supporting Israel), and they found just such a worldview with neoconservatism.

The neocons have inherited Trotsky’s project of destroying the nations, and the religions and families on which they are based, in hopes that utopia will emerge from the rubble. By posing as liberals — as in Kagan’s veiled call for Trump’s assassination on the pretext that Trump threatens liberal democracy — the neocons have succeeded in remaking what passes for liberalism in their own image.

No wonder today’s “liberalism” is totalitarian and genocidal.

https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/why-is-the-liberal-media-inciting

 

 

Are you actually a Muslim Mac?

 

Only the right wing hates the Jews as much as the Muslims.

 

Who is Kevin Barrett? I clicked the link in your post.

 

Kevin Barrett 
@KEVINBARRETT

Kevin Barrett is an American Muslim and PhD Islamic Studies scholar who has authored or edited seven books and wages "truth jihad" by writing and broadcasting.

 

Hardly, independent or unbiased, is he. A man waging a 'truth jihad' or 'truth Holy War' is not going to be unbiased is he, if he thinks he in a war.

 

How do we know he's not actually part of the propaganda arm of this 'Truth Jihad/Holy War'

 

How do we know your not spreading Muslim propaganda?

 

How do you know?

 

What convinces you he's a reliable source?

 

More to the point, he justifies Hamas actions because he says the Jews are worse, and you've posted this.

 

That means you support the Hamas atrocities on October 7th as justified.

 

You support Muslim Paedophiles and their efforts to establish a Muslim Country, of depraved barbaric paedophiles who oppress women.

 

You do want hell on Earth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by pi3141
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"But he told him, “Let the dead bury their dead, but you go and spread the news of the kingdom of God.”  Luke 9:60

 

In other words;  let them be that are enjoying the illusion and playing their game of deceit, seek out them that are ready and willing for The Real Solution and will see and hear and accept The Truth.

 

To assume they are not enjoying it is to assume they are stupid and not what they really are, which then is validating the illusion and then an expression of stupidity itself and an expression of being not what I am.

When I project stupidity on others, it is only I that am expressing it and making it so in my world.

 

 

 

"...expect no mercy!..in the game you're playin if you lose you gotta pay, if you make one wrong move...you'll get blown away, expect no mercy..."

 

 

 

 

Edited by novymir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Genocide in Numbers – This is What Israel Has Done to Gaza
February 11, 2024

  • 128 days of the war.
  • 2,438 massacres.
  • 35,176 martyred and missing.
  • 28,176 martyrs whose bodies have reached the hospitals.
  • 12,300 child martyrs.
  • 8,400 women martyrs.
  • 340 medical worker martyrs.
  • 46 civil defense martyrs.
  • 124 journalist martyrs.
  • 7,000 missing; 70% of them are children and women.
  • 67,784 wounded.
  • 11,000 wounded in need of travel for life-saving and critical treatment.
  • 10,000 cancer patients at risk of death.
  • 700,000 Gazans infected with infectious diseases as a result of displacement.
  • 8,000 cases of viral hepatitis infection due to displacement.
  • 60,000 pregnant women are at risk due to lack of access to health care.
  • 350,000 chronic patients are at risk due to lack of administration of medications.
  • 99 arrests of health workers.
  • 10 arrests of journalists whose names are known.
  • 2 million displaced in the Gaza Strip.
  • 142 government headquarters destroyed by the occupation.
  • 100 schools and universities completely destroyed by the occupation.
  • 295 schools and universities partially destroyed by the occupation.
  • 184 mosques completely destroyed by the occupation.
  • 266 mosques partially destroyed by the occupation.
  • 3 churches targeted and destroyed by the occupation.
  • 70,000 residential units completely destroyed by the occupation.
  • 290,000 residential units partially destroyed by the occupation.
  • 66,000 tons of explosives dropped by the occupation on Gaza.
  • 30 hospitals taken out of service by the occupation.
  • 53 health centers taken out of service by the occupation.
  • 150 health centers partially destroyed by the occupation.
  • 123 ambulances completely destroyed by the occupation.
  • 200 archaeological and heritage sites destroyed by the occupation.

https://www.palestinechronicle.com/genocide-in-numbers-this-is-what-israel-has-done-to-gaza/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Israel is holding up food for 1.1 million Palestinians in Gaza, the main UN aid agency there says

Updated 4:41 PM GMT, February 9, 2024

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel has imposed financial restrictions on the main U.N. agency providing aid in the Gaza Strip, a measure which prevented a shipment of food for 1.1 million Palestinians from reaching the war-battered enclave, the agency’s director said Friday.

The restrictions deepened a crisis between Israel and UNRWA, whose operations have been threatened following Israeli accusations that some of its workers participated in the Oct. 7 attack that triggered Israel’s war in Gaza. Those accusations have led major donor nations, including the U.S., to suspend funding to the U.N. organization and left its future in question.

UNRWA’s director, Philippe Lazzarini, said Friday that that a convoy of food donated by Turkey has been sitting for weeks in the Israeli port city of Ashdod. The agency said that the Israeli contractor they work with received a call from Israeli customs authorities “ordering them not to process any UNRWA goods.”

https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-gaza-unwra-bank-aid-4ed5e0652dd81b875055679a01a19371

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, pi3141 said:

DECEMBER 7, 2023

 

The Same Extremists Target Both Muslims and Jews


Far-right extremists shifted their online hate from Muslims to Jews in 2017, and offline hate followed the same trends 

BY WILL HOBBS & NAZITA LAJEVARDI

 

Contemporary discourse often pits Muslims and Jews against one another. But our research demonstrates that a large amount of seemingly disconnected hateful rhetoric about both—at least in 2017—originated from the same far-right extremist communities. We urge observers, researchers and leaders to investigate the traces and origins of the hate targeting both groups today, and to consider the potential outsized role that extremist communities may be playing in stoking hatred against Muslims and Jews today.

 

This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

 

Link - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-same-extremists-target-both-muslims-and-jews/

 

This reads like a textbook stawman piece by a couple of university sociologists. Putting the focus of anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim ideology onto the far-right (ie whites), when most hatred of Jews and Muslims comes from, Muslims and Jews. Many also have the west. With all the fighting in the middle east stirred up by the puppet masters it's not hard to see why.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Campion said:

This reads like a textbook stawman piece by a couple of university sociologists. Putting the focus of anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim ideology onto the far-right (ie whites), when most hatred of Jews and Muslims comes from, Muslims and Jews. Many also have the west. With all the fighting in the middle east stirred up by the puppet masters it's not hard to see why.  

 

I don't know, I think its plausible. 

 

When you look back at the Anti-Semitism that existed in England, Simon De Montford expelled the Jews from Leicester before or during the Baronial wars, and even up to the second world war one of our Prime ministers was openly antisemitic. I guess the Upper Classes never forgot the Waterloo fiasco where Rothschilds bought England.

 

I do think theirs been plenty of hate through the years from all round to be honest. So it wouldn't surprise me if their existed a substantial element.

 

But I agree it seems the most hatred is between Muslims and Jews. Thats just an opinion.

 

 

Edited by pi3141
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Fluke said:

They also voted them in!

 

Well I don't know but I wonder, did they or was they forced on them.

 

I mean, were the Taliban voted in?

 

Or did they just assume control.

 

Did Hamas do the same.

 

But if they did vote them in, and if they allow Hamas to move with them and actively shield Hamas from Israel, then that makes them part of the army and legitimate targets.

 

Its distressing to think that, but if that is the reality of the situation, then its extremely dire.

 

I would like to think the true Palestinians want no part of this and that it is Hamas that are forcing them into this. I would like to think Israel can rid the Palestinian people of Hamas while harming as few innocents as possible. But under the conditions, I can't see how they can do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, pi3141 said:

When you look back at the Anti-Semitism that existed in England, Simon De Montford expelled the Jews from Leicester before or during the Baronial wars, and even up to the second world war one of our Prime ministers was openly antisemitic. I guess the Upper Classes never forgot the Waterloo fiasco where Rothschilds bought England.

 

What do you think were the motives behind the historical expulsions? Was it an actual hatred or powerful people protecting their own position? 

 

And back in the middle ages and early modern period, lots of other religious groups were hated, expelled, burned at the stake by whoever was the church in charge at the time. Not only Jews. Christians have hated other Christians, Pagans and Atheists in the past too, but the left wing academics don't call them "far right" for that do they? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/13/2024 at 2:35 PM, Campion said:

 

What do you think were the motives behind the historical expulsions? Was it an actual hatred or powerful people protecting their own position? 

 

And back in the middle ages and early modern period, lots of other religious groups were hated, expelled, burned at the stake by whoever was the church in charge at the time. Not only Jews. Christians have hated other Christians, Pagans and Atheists in the past too, but the left wing academics don't call them "far right" for that do they? 

Deuteronomy 7:16

"And you shall consume all the peoples that the LORD your God will give over to you. Your eye shall not pity them, neither shall you serve their gods, for that would be a snare to you."

 

That means uninhibited positions of power and control over others.  "Supranational tribal cult" not bound to any location, one unified entity with many masks that facilitates the same end objective.

 

They've been altering "history" for a long time. 

 

 

goyim.jpeg

 

 

 

Edited by novymir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Gaza descends into the Dark Ages, with the IDF inflicting medieval torture on civilian captives, rounded up on mass, stripped, handcuffed, blindfolded and called Hamas, for the entertainment of the Israeli public who enjoy viewing the footage, the ZOG’s in the West are not sure if the situation on the ground qualifies as genocide, even although the ICJ called it “plausible” but they believe Israel’s narrative about an alleged “genocide” of around a thousand Jews on October 7th.

 

Since that date Israel has killed 30,000 Palestinians, which is an average kill-rate of 200 people each day, half of whom are children. This does not include the bodies still beneath the rubble. There are 60,000 wounded, with life-changing injuries and trauma, but insufficient medical facilities to cope. This is being compounded by starvation as aid is prevented from entering the Gaza Strip by the IDF and fanatical protestors, but if it does, it’s every man for himself as desperate people fight for survival, which is called an “unruly mob” and the soldiers then fire upon them.

 

Rich-Sunak says he does not want to see the fighting go on “any longer than is necessary” which means he thinks Israel’s continuing campaign of ethnic cleansing is “necessary.” He said a ceasefire “is not in anyone’s interest.” It’s certainly not in the interest of the corporate sector, of which his family are members, because it is in Israel’s interest to develop offshore gas in the Mediterranean Sea, accommodated by the Belt & Road project and the proposed Ben-Gurion canal. They have already begun bisecting Gaza with a new gravel road, called Highway 749.

 

 

 

https://www.trtworld.com/video/digital/highway-749-israels-plan-to-split-gaza-in-two-17072007

 

 

 

Edited by Velma
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...