Jump to content

Looks like they're on to Russell Brand now.


78ast78dgyad

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Certified Green of Heart said:

 

I don't pretend to know all his 'social infractions' as the PC brigade would refer to it, but at least he tries to be enlightened, whether or not being a naughty MAN in the process. I suppose BOY is one way to put it (such as boy-ish charm), but I don't wanna be patronizing to the guy, no matter his sometimes frivolous antics.

It's a quote from a Monty Python film. The Life Of Brian.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They really are ramping this up over at Fox News... sorry, I mean The Guardian

 

I quote:

 

"The allegations against Russell Brand that surfaced at the weekend and which he has denied – that he is a rapist, a groomer, possessed of a nihilistic sense of impunity – appear concrete and specific, and could terminate in criminal proceedings."

 

Yet, so far, none of the alleged victims in the documentary are pressing charges and, more importantly, he has not been tried in a court of law. At this point nobody knows if he's guilty or not - but let's forget about that tiny detail and roll with he's guilty as f__k for our readership.

 

So far it's one new case from 2003 - and they've yet to press charges, much like the previous four alleged victims.

 

Something tells me some very powerful people have a very large axe to grind. It's getting progressively harder to see this any other way.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks legion, I didn't know him before but I recognised Yuval Noah Harari mmediately from your picture when I saw him on BBC's HardTalk tonight, Monday 18th September. What a coincidence?! 😉 

 

On 9/17/2023 at 1:54 PM, legion said:

IMG_20230917_135229.jpg

 

On 9/17/2023 at 1:57 PM, Macnamara said:

that's the most damning thing so far!

 

On 9/17/2023 at 4:22 PM, legion said:

 

On 9/17/2023 at 6:42 PM, screamingeagle said:

 

On 9/17/2023 at 7:24 PM, screamingeagle said:

 

On 9/17/2023 at 7:29 PM, legion said:

OMFG 🤢 

 

On 9/17/2023 at 9:22 PM, northern star said:

There is an aspect to Russell that attests to his huge success, along with his looks, in that he is very charming and gracious to everyone he meets, and bowls people over, and gets whatever he wants. Its a gift most of us dont have, so have to give him credit. Im sure he does a lot of good in the world too.

 

This, however, was a step too far. This Harari entity (I dont even think he's human) is a head of the snake character who could effectively bring an end to humanity itself. He seems to think its a foregone conclusion and spends his time selling the inevitable takeover of AI, whilst protected by the Jewish thing, which has no bearing on the issue whatsoever. But he really has to be exposed as the monster he is by people with a profile like Russell, not cuddled up to. This was the last straw for me - people have to know how dangerous this Harari character is. Literally promoting the end of humanity. Yuval, means descendant of Cain, a flood of Evil in the time of Noah, and what we are witnessing now too.

 

The sex accusations are but a drop in the ocean compared to fraternising with this creature. Hence the distraction.

 

On 9/17/2023 at 10:21 PM, rebornsteve said:

Harari is pure anti-human. 
 

Brand is a pawn in this game. Good v evil.

 

Brand has seen the light. He is being used to help shine the light on the dark that is anti-human.

 

2 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

Agreed, Harari is a George Soros and Open Societies puppet. Brand stuff is most likely distraction from what is already out there or that there's more to come out about something I am not so sure, possibly Andrew? Or simply the fact they refuse to release information on him for x number of years, much like the pharmaceutical companies regarding side effects/harms from medications.

 

2 hours ago, Certified Green of Heart said:

Didn't ever hear of him before this thread.

 

2 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

He's a fairly well promoted pseudointellectual like most of the talking heads nowadays spreading ideals and "science" at the masses for the non-discerning listener to swallow as gospel.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure what to make of it all. Certainly like many, I have had major doubts about Brand all along from an intuitive sense. When you look at his past and who he is/has been connected to, it is hard to not have suspicions, and that is before bringing intuition in to it. It is interesting seeing those who demand 'evidence or proof' that RB is not to be trusted, after all, isn't honing intuition one of the skills most often espoused in both the 'truth' community and in 'Spirituality'? 

 

Like Elon Musk, you also need to look beyond Brand's words, and look towards his actions for a full picture. I cannot help feeling that perhaps the 'Cabal' are moving their 'back-up' actors into position. In recent times we have Elon Musk, Tucker Carlson, Andrew Tate, Donald Trump and perhaps soon, Russel Brand being lauded as hero's and perhaps the 'new leaders'; right on cue for a possible revolution, but if so, it will be a fake revolution if those are to be the leaders of this.

 

As ever, the 'Cabal' always have many irons in the fire, and so this is likely to be a multi-faceted operation. It is strange though, I will give you that. It could well be that Brand has indeed switched allegiances, possible but unlikely I would say. Perhaps it is simply another attempt at a devastating blow to the 'truthers' and to cast aspersions on all of us with guilt by association. 

 

There is no doubt whatsoever that this is a coordinated attack on Brand, which is certainly interesting and suspicious. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/17/2023 at 1:54 PM, legion said:

IMG_20230917_135229.jpg

 

On 9/17/2023 at 7:24 PM, screamingeagle said:

 

 

On 9/17/2023 at 6:42 PM, screamingeagle said:

 

 

The proverbial can of worms gets canier and wormier.. 

News this morning - RB's YT channel has been de-monetised.. 

So the channel remains for now. 

 

Despite the videos above of Brand cozying up with Harari, I found this video of Brand openly calling out the WEF and it's policies. 

 

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, legion said:

Despite the videos above of Brand cozying up with Harari, I found this video of Brand openly calling out the WEF and it's policies. 

he has to some how lure in the inexperience people,build up his "reputation" 

 

he clearly distanced him self from David Icke on Joe Rogan podcast(as is Joe Rogan) 

 

puppets both of them,attention whores,trying to make money on internet

along with serving their masters!!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, legion said:

 

 

 

The proverbial can of worms gets canier and wormier.. 

News this morning - RB's YT channel has been de-monetised.. 

So the channel remains for now. 

 

Despite the videos above of Brand cozying up with Harari, I found this video of Brand openly calling out the WEF and it's policies. 

 

 

 

And further... I found an interesting discussion between Dr John Campbell and RB from 3 weeks ago. 

 

Moderna corruption in UK / Australia / Canada / Governments / funding.. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why, why, why didn't they just deplatform him like all the others we've seen disappear from YT over the past 10 years..? 

 

Why was he allowed to run unchecked..? 

 

One of his videos even calls out YT censorship, FFS... 

 

I couldn't even upload a video I had of London protests a couple of years ago. I got a warning for going against YT policies. 

 

Why now..? Why in this way..? 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Maggotman said:

Brand needs to be arrested, charged and face a jury who will determine if he is guilty until then he is an innocent person.  

 

He's been tried by Channel4 and found guilty by the media. A court of law would probably aquit him for lack of actual evidence.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I detest trial by media and the ongoing training of the public to accept and get used to it. I notice it's the same old spats, the stirring up on social media, the same old actors ... Piers Morgan tackles Alan Sugar, and vice versa. It's 'pick a side', with not much middle ground. 

 

I always remind myself of 'the old' innocent until proven guilty that we would all want for ourselves. 

 

Also that Brand is most likely playing a part. My friend asked me who would want to be accused of being a rapist (and the rest) but if it's a good enough part with the right payoff, who knows how far someone would go? 

 

Either way it's a classic example of a marketing campaign? A forced agenda. The shit storm of words and repetition is reminiscent of many of the other ones we've seen 'recently'

 

I noticed the use of the word consent, which was also used in the Spanish Women's football chapter / episode, as in "I didn't give consent."

 

As Anti Facts Sir said lessons will be learnt  

 

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/showbiz-tv/lord-alan-sugar-under-fire-27733265?int_source=nba

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/17/2023 at 1:07 AM, jack121 said:

Brand is the guy who called out the whole nwo thing, then a few months later was caling for digital currency, a total reversal on his previous statement, once he had suckered in the sheep he completly changed his stance and revealed his true agenda. And he was married to katy perry who is a proven visitor to epstein's paedophile island, he may well have also been involved in molesting and murdering little children. Perry is nwo through and through,and brand chooses to marry her out of all the people in the world, that stinks. It would make my skin crawl to snuggle up to a proven paedophile who can rape torture and kill babies

This may be like the phil schoefied case, where they can only cover up so much before they have to fuck him off in order to save their own paedophling skin

This comment is stupid and riddled with assumptions. Just because you marry someone does not mean you are them or act like them. That marriage lasted 2 years.

We all know most big celebrities or compromised in their early fame days, and Brand admitted to being an effed up mess many years ago, hence probably has some skeletons.

Perhaps you should consider what it would be like to receive accusations rather than fling out labels like a 10 year old in a schoolyard.

Brand has now been demoneterised from YT, all on accusation and no criminal charges yet.

I'm not on either side, for it or against, I'd rather wait for facts and charges whilst viewing all possibilities.

FYI nobody has accused him of paedophilia either.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, screamingeagle said:

JR and RB

 

Hmmm... 

I've only ever watched / listened to JR when Graham Hancock was a guest. 

 

They both still think the Plandemic was real. 

 

They both think it was an accidental Wuhan Leak) 

 

They both think 'mistakes were made' in regards to the over-reaction. 

 

They both deny there's an overarching agenda in progress. 

(corporations and governments are just taking advantage of natural events - basically opportunists) 

 

They both still think Bill Gates is just looking for profits (monetary) 

 

JR is okay with Men using Women's bathrooms / toilets / changing rooms. 

 

JR clearly ridiculed David Icke and said that Alex Jones is infinitely better than DI. (IMO AJ is a complete joke of a shill) 

 

There's more to say, but I need to detoxify myself from that podcast now...

 

Thanks @screamingeagle- that was a painful couple of hours.

Russell Brand talks too fast (much like most Americans - except for JR) 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, legion said:

 

 

 

The proverbial can of worms gets canier and wormier.. 

News this morning - RB's YT channel has been de-monetised.. 

So the channel remains for now. 

 

Despite the videos above of Brand cozying up with Harari, I found this video of Brand openly calling out the WEF and it's policies. 

 

 

Perhaps, when you are on the 'inside' for a while as Brand was via the entertainment industry, you get to see stuff that is abhorrent. Later, you may decide to call out what you've seen and heard, even though you know it can damage you.

Only time will tell if there is enough validity for criminal charges.

The current system is being torn apart, it's going to be a wild ride from now on while they try to keep the power and control they crave in the cabal.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2023 at 3:25 PM, legion said:

 

So what do you think about his ridiculous explanation for why he has 33 tattooed on his wrist..? 

 

What do you think about the item in his hand when he was interviewed with Katie Perry - the object with the Pentagram and the word - OBEY... 

 

 

Screenshot_20230916_142734.jpg

Right on!

The guy is a scumbag and the sooner we see the back of him, the better.

 

He's another puppet to the shit show we are all watching.

 

Doenut believes it's part of a humiliation ritual he's going through.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, northern star said:

The numbers on his Youtube have gone up now, but on the day of the broadcast the numbers hit 6.6million followers, with 2.4k videos - therefore 666.
Co-incidence?

 

Obviously we know the words 'programme' and 'broadcast' are telling us an evil spell is being cast, and people's minds programmed.

Spot on, Northern Star. It's all designed this way. They love their numerology.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, allymisfit said:

Spot on, Northern Star. It's all designed this way. They love their numerology.

 

Or it means nothing at all. You can find patterns anywhere if you look for them and if you want to. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophenia

 

It's a pretty obvious logical fallacy. 

 

Sometimes Occam's razor applies, the most simplest explanations are the right ones. Brand is being attacked because he stepped out of line one too many times with regards to upsetting the people at the top. And it's also part of the ongoing war against men, where any man can be accused of sexual misdeeds for spurious reasons. Sexual harassment or controlling behaviour etc. are extremely broad and vaguely defined, intentionally so. It means if they want to find a way to make you guilty of something, they can do. 

 

If you've ever flirted with or asked a woman out, especially at work but it could be anywhere, then the law could easily make a case that you have committed sexual harassment, if your advances were unwanted (and how do you find out if they're wanted, without asking?). Furthermore, even if the woman consents, she can withdraw consent later, even years later, and claim she was 'coerced'. This can happen to any man in the West now and there are men sitting in prison today because of it. 

Edited by dirtydog
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...