Jump to content

Looks like they're on to Russell Brand now.


78ast78dgyad

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, northern star said:

Just like they all knew what Savile, Schofield and Edwards were doing for years. We probably dont know even a fraction of it.

But Edwards and Schofield weren't noncing as far as we know right? Because the Schofield scandal that came to nothing had peadophillic undertones, and so did Huws case.

 

I don't really see why people like Douglas Murray are coming out slagging the man off when however obnoxious or talentless one believes him to be and I couldn't give a shit if the man believed the official narrative of 9/11 and neither should anyone..anyone barking mad enough to follow him as some sort of guru in the first place deserves to be led up the garden path.

 

if these allegations are as serious as the media are making out then surely go to the police.

Funny all these women hide their faces as well you noticed that? 

Edited by Fluke
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy is pretty suspect along with that strange Atwood bloke. This Andrew guy has been making about 6 videos a day about brand. 

 

And his just posted this. Does anyone else remember a time when people didn't take the internet so seriously or is it just me? What has happened to us 😂.

 

Maybe the whole thing is to do with bringing in censorship. 

Screenshot_2023-09-21-00-15-12-49_99c04817c0de5652397fc8b56c3b3817.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Fluke said:

But Edwards and Schofield weren't noncing as far as we know right? Because the Schofield scandal that came to nothing had peadophillic undertones, and so did Huws case.

 

I don't really see why people like Douglas Murray are coming out slagging the man off when however obnoxious or talentless one believes him to be and I couldn't give a shit if the man believed the official narrative of 9/11 and neither should anyone..anyone barking mad enough to follow him as some sort of guru in the first place deserves to be led up the garden path.

 

if these allegations are as serious as the media are making out then surely go to the police.

Funny all these women hide their faces as well you noticed that? 

 

Has to be said, Russell is very very late to the conspiracy party. But he spotted an opportunity and caught up, and is very popular because of it, which is why theyre onto making this a trophy case. They only take notice when these things become popular, as with MLK, John Lennon, Avicii etc etc. Maybe he does genuinely care about these issues and wouldnt stick his neck out otherwise.

 

Agree Fluke - do these women accusers even exist, or are they a media creation? If this is going to be a serious case there will have to be some proof or its he said, she said. In other words, a nothing burger. Its also interesting the cases are ten years old or so, so the Demonic Cabal might make anything we've said online in the last ten years a hate crime. I expect that's what this is all about and Brand is being used as a catalyst.

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fluke said:

This guy is pretty suspect along with that strange Atwood bloke. This Andrew guy has been making about 6 videos a day about brand. 

 

And his just posted this. Does anyone else remember a time when people didn't take the internet so seriously or is it just me? What has happened to us 😂.

 

Maybe the whole thing is to do with bringing in censorship. 

Screenshot_2023-09-21-00-15-12-49_99c04817c0de5652397fc8b56c3b3817.jpg

 

Yep, we have to remember theyre making a lot of money from this made up inflated media scandal, so six videos a day makes sense.

 

Worth mentioning too this is very far removed from sex crimes in the real world, where women are often unheard and powerless with little chance of justice, compared to women in the circles Russell moved in, probably looking for parties, sex, money and a good time, and he was their Casanova. They knew what he was like, and entered his showbiz/ sexbiz orbit willingly. TV, Film, music, it's a brothel, a sex industry. Why pretend otherwise. At least Russell was honest about it.

 

Anyway the next stage is surely a criminal investigation, so we'll see if these women come forward and take it to that stage. Could it be a crime, when the BBC and Channel 4 were in full knowledge of his shenanigans for decades, and even facilitating them? Surely they will be criminally implicated too? As will the mother who drove her child, one of the accusers, to a known sexual predator.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by northern star
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, northern star said:

 

Has to be said, Russell is very very late to the conspiracy party. But he spotted an opportunity and caught up, and is very popular because of it, which is why theyre onto making this a trophy case. They only take notice when these things become popular, as with MLK, John Lennon, Avicii etc etc. Maybe he does genuinely care about these issues and wouldnt stick his neck out otherwise.

 

Agree Fluke - do these women accusers even exist, or are they a media creation? If this is going to be a serious case there will have to be some proof or its he said, she said. In other words, a nothing burger. Its also interesting the cases are ten years old or so, so the Demonic Cabal might make anything we've said online in the last ten years a hate crime. I expect that's what this is all about and Brand is being used as a catalyst.

 

 

Yes, like many he is an opportunist of sorts. As I was washing up last night I was mulling over the many possibilities of what this is about after reading the forum, and one of the many thoughts I had was "if THEY are going after him, then that must mean he is a good guy/on the right side', and then I thought voila, is that what this is about? Are the 'Cabal' going after him to add credibility to Brand (in the truth community that is)? On any thread I have ever come across regarding Brand, going back to the early days, he has always divided opinion. Much like Trump, is it possible that they are attempting to 'prove' that Brand is on the side of 'truth'; because like me doing the washing up, I have seen it many times where people in the 'truth community' take these things as 'proof' that that said person must be 'one of us'; as in 'they would not go after him/her, if they weren't on the side of good'. 

 

It is just a thought, and as I have said earlier, these things tend to be multi-faceted, but there is no doubt that the attacks on Trump, Tate and now Brand, are adding some credibility to these people because as we know, all three have divided opinions in the 'truth community'. So maybe this is for US, and these people really are being moved into position of the organisers of 'the revolution'; maybe these types of people, are their contingency? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got to hand it to you NS*......Your posts above are some of the best so far from what I've read 😇...... On good form Northern Star*....

 

You have good balanced arguements, not blinded by razzmatazz or the egos or celeb or the inflated too big for its' boots tale telling (& of those which "need to grow up" in the press) aka media pundits and prattish puns etc... but the Media will do whatever and say whatever all for the love of money/power,, meanwhile rising to fame popularizers like Brand will be popularised (for good and for bad) and polarize the audience as was probably intended by the BIG HAND in the background... and yet still Brand gets to remain popular despite whatever side we think he is on, and yeah yeah this is all part of the Cabal experiment it is easy to imagine even where looking at the Russell Brand coming onto the conspiracy scene late.. (& actually as convenience would suggest for that reason specifically he becomes a "nice tool" to partially unleash fear by the handlers, but IMO instead Brand raised genuine concern...), but by gosh eitherway if anybody could flare that up and project stuff out into the world, Brand *has* in uncompromising fashion if appearances are to be believed, but all in, did so rather too well🫣😅 In The Eyes Of The Powerful....<< SinBin Lovers.

 

Furthermore in the wider than wider picture (Sts), if any sort of justice prevails for HUMANITY AS A SUPPOSED WHOLE (divisions don't go there, lol) l😁 but yeah led by us 🤔 as a CONSCIENCIOUS PLURALISTIC society I GUESS, about scrutinizing or betteryet boycotting the Media -and- Other Cabalists, well they in turn where their time comes, must learnt to take their punishment if it ever comes their way, for a multitude of Dire Sins, and which argueably from the Cabals pervy perspective, would hypocritically & knowingly constitute - at least by their own WONKY STANDARDS - what they probably had sort of intended, in some regard, by lending a hand in setting the scene for controversial famous figure-heads to appear of whatever notoriety- as if on their behalf -in the first place, which aka again arguably is for giving Brand the Mouth Piece and Full Voice in the full blown arena such as we see was granted! But Not that I regret his presence and seeing him speak out on YouTube... (& hey-ho, tic-tac-toe, from my speculation or my perspective my estimation is as I said, it all went further than the Cabal perhaps anticipated for swinging between Lies & Truth through a mouthpiece such as Brand.... In a way we could liken to teasing pendulum fashion, anyway I don't know for sure, but Truth Glimmers or Shards of Truth are better than nothing at all, if we believe that is all Brand has given us, whilst others in the audience may think his is not legit full stop... Fine, whatever to that faction... and all the time whilst the Cabal Agenda Steps Up in lowly fascist fashion for things like Censorship, they are ALWAYS & FOREVER looking to punish us ordinary people and FOR WHAT, well because they are immoral and selfish and evil of course. Dang right! 

 

 

Edited by Certified Green of Heart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

‘Video platform Rumble has "emphatically rejected" a letter from MPs who wrote to ask if the service would cut Russell Brand's income in the wake of several rape and abuse allegations.

Dame Caroline Dinenage, chair of the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee, wrote to Rumble to say she was "concerned" that Brand could profit from the host of content he posts.’

 

https://www.itv.com/news/2023-09-21/russell-brand-rumble-rejects-disturbing-letter-from-mps-querying-monetisation
 

interestingly, Dame Caroline Dinenage is married to Baron Mark Lancaster who was Deputy Commander of the 77th Brigade from June 2018 to July 2020.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The Brigade uses social media such as Twitter and Facebook as well as psyop techniques to influence populations and behaviour. David Miller, a professor of political sociology at the University of Bristol who studies British government propaganda and public relations, said that it is "involved in manipulation of the media including using fake online profiles".

 

I guess we're closer to the truth now, perhaps?

 

Interesting how this Brand story has gone from 3 or 4 running articles on the front page of the Guardian to... none... and very quickly.

 

But the damage has been done now - All future media articles will now 'not so subtly' probably make reference to these allegations every single time they mention him. For example, articles can now begin; "The alleged rapist, Russel Brand, caused a stir today..." etc, etc.

 

This is what they wanted, regardless of whether he's guilty or not, so that he'll be well and truly demonised whenever they do happen to mention him.

 

But Brand is smart, or he's got good lawyers, because he's done the right thing and not said a word. Every word that comes out of his mouth would give the tabloids and broadrags an excuse to run an article. He's kept his mouth shut - and they've got nothing. I assume this is not what they expected from their "psychological profile" because he is, generally speaking, what you'd call an outspoken person. This tactic, too, appears to have completely backfired. The longer he stays silent, the less his enemies who clearly just want to bring him down, have anything to go on - or a justification to keep running these articles on the front pages.

 

Anyone seen any charges yet?

 

Nope, me neither.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2023 at 5:20 PM, Macnamara said:

They don't even need to dredge up something true as they can throw mud which creates stigma and once that is there it diminishes someones message in the eyes of others. Suddenly people aren't thinking anymore about the topics like the covid plandemic or 911 truth or child trafficking and instead are obsessing over salacious details about peoples lives that detract away from the cabal and their activities.

 

its about creating doubt in peoples minds about people and therefore about what they are speaking out about.....the technical term for that is 'cognitive infiltration'

 

Salacious Glossy Mags anyone?? Mercy me 🤣 Mac is right of course.....but Trouble with going from Pillar to Post when a large section of the population has been puppy trained into liking Glossy Mags😵‍💫 ... (of course NOT ME MY FRIEND) 😅...is they indeed still find Russell Brand inside those Gossip Columns ..(indirectly Brand being SUBJECT TO that sort of DROSS, for the most part *I imagine* rather than a willing? participant, unless it's so called "HELLO MAGAZIINE" for example with more class, but I wouldn't want to appear in that either personally)...

 

Elsewise back to the trivial nature of Gossip mags where confusion is spread rifely & glibly in such off the scale nonsense acting like some sort of civi-street tribunal on subjects the reader can barely comprehend anyway. 🤔🫠😁  (unto which that reflects perfectly nicely for the money making hussle their petty publishers for Goss & Gloss alike), so anyway due to Brands dual existence in notoriety, one of either was meant to distract you away from the truth acquisitioning version of Russell Brand or versa vice. 

 

Jo-Public who would struggle to know the meaning of "conspiracy" and its' implications 🤣 would crack like being hit by a lightning strike and flake away if they knew anything at all......Anyway we end up getting a mixture of both sorts of publishings and so whoever looking or not, may just find him anyway, being quite ubiquitous in one form or another! 😁 Yep, classic media treadmill by how they portray and operate. Trading stupid with cupid basicly as all the time, they the Media do, and seeing if anyone blinks and actually checks if "Truth" (if in some way identified to be such) wasn't just another person altogether, lol. Noooo it's still Russell Brand, """" WE INSIST """"

Edited by Certified Green of Heart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rebornsteve said:

‘Video platform Rumble has "emphatically rejected" a letter from MPs who wrote to ask if the service would cut Russell Brand's income in the wake of several rape and abuse allegations.

Dame Caroline Dinenage, chair of the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee, wrote to Rumble to say she was "concerned" that Brand could profit from the host of content he posts.’

 

https://www.itv.com/news/2023-09-21/russell-brand-rumble-rejects-disturbing-letter-from-mps-querying-monetisation
 

interestingly, Dame Caroline Dinenage is married to Baron Mark Lancaster who was Deputy Commander of the 77th Brigade from June 2018 to July 2020.

 

 


 

IMG_3990.jpeg
https://members.parliament.uk/member/4008/registeredinterests

Edited by rebornsteve
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If someone gets cancelled on social media, or loses their job because of allegations which aren't proven true in court, I wonder if they can claim compensation for lost earnings through the slander or libel laws? Because if the law still recognises the principle of innocent until proven guilty, then any mud which does stick is causing them financial damages. Mind you, the libel laws are out of reach to all but the mega rich. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rebornsteve said:

This completes the ‘conspiracy’

 

“Honour for campaigning MP who pioneered Online Safety Bill

Dame Caroline Dinenage was recognised by the Princess Royal on Tuesday for political and public service.”

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/caroline-dinenage-princess-royal-gosport-government-harrow-b2205528.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, northern star said:

....Worth mentioning too this is very far removed from sex crimes in the real world, where women are often unheard and powerless with little chance of justice, compared to women in the circles Russell moved in, probably looking for parties, sex, money and a good time, and he was their Casanova...

 

You, and others here, have clearly not listened to the the survivors' testimony.

 

Russell Brand's victims include a schoolgirl who was delivered, via BBC chauffeur, from her school lessons to Russell Brand's house. Here, she described how Brand pushed his phallus down her throat until she was unable to breathe. Then to prevent herself from being choked to death by Brand, she had to punch Russell Brand in the stomach as hard as she could. Later, Brand ordered the schoolgirl to sit in a bathtub of water. Leaving the house, Brand demanded that the schoolgirl remain in the cold water until he returned.

 

Being only a CHILD, and already having been nearly choked to death by Brand's phallus, the child shivered until his return.

 

From this you got, "he was their Casanova." and she was " looking for parties, sex, money".

A CHILD.

Jesus. Welcome to society.

 

Edited by octoplex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, northern star said:

...Russell is very very late to the conspiracy party. But he spotted an opportunity and caught up, and is very popular because of it...

 

Is Brand even popular?

We have no idea if Brand is popular or not.

YouTube numbers are all gamed on the backend, as we've known for several years now.

Google is a CIA project. They boost numbers for those they want to appear popular, and subtract numbers from those they don't. Here's some info on how the CIA made Google

 

Rumble feeds repackaged mainstream-trash to YouTube refugees

Rumble is the CIA's catchment zone for Google refugees and is also a CIA project.

When you get tired of YouTube because it's all 'fake', you get funneled into Rumble, where you can watch people like Russell Brand feed you the same stories that were on CNN's YouTube channel, but now with the added-twist that the story is now being disputed (by Brand). The problem is, you are being fed the same core narratives; only in polarized form.

 

You're still eating trash; only now it's inverted-trash and, as you watch Russell Brand preach from behind his Chinese-child-slave manufactured Apple MacBook M1, you can feel like you're all hip and 'alternative'. When all you actually are is someone having the Associated-Press-Newswire sewage-funnel fired into your face by a child-rapist who keeps telling you to "stay free" while behind the scenes he's ramming his phallus down the throats of GCSE students (as reported by The Times, Channel 4, The Mail etc).

 

Russell Brand owns a Pub

Russell Brand owns a pub for the love of Zeus!

A pub.

A recovered alcoholic who own a pub.

A messiah who rapes children (as reported in all major newspapers).

 

Is everyone here certain -- and I mean absolutely certain -- they want to get behind Brand and cheerlead him just because he once told you that the World Health Organization were evil? Wow.

 

Some of You have been Gamed

Centralized video-streaming platform services like Rumble are not the solution to centralized video streaming services.

Many of you got gamed.

First by Rumble, which is the CIA's holding-pen for YouTube evacuees.

Secondly by Brand, who is a child rapist (as reported and evidenced in all major newspapers and multiple survivors).

Today it was announced that the special investigations team set up to bring-down Savile ("The Hydrant Programme") now has Russell Brand as its primary target.

 

This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Many people on this forum should be careful who you support; your words may return to haunt you.

 

Also: Read David Icke's books again. You clearly missed a lot.

Edited by octoplex
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, octoplex said:

 

We have no idea if Brand is popular or not.

YouTube numbers are all gamed on the backend, as we've known for several years now.

Google is a CIA project. They boost numbers for those they want to appear popular, and subtract numbers from those they don't.

 

Rumble is the CIA's catchment zone for Google refugees and is also a CIA project.

When you get tired of YouTube because it's all 'fake', you get funneled into Rumble, where you can watch people like Russell Brand feed you the same stories that were on CNN's YouTube channel, but now with the added-twist that the story is now being disputed (by Brand). The problem is, you are being fed the same core narratives; only in polarized form.

 

You're still eating trash; only now it's inverted-trash and, as you watch Russell Brand preach from behind his Chinese-child-slave manufactured Apple MacBook M1, you can feel like you're all hip and 'alternative'. When all you actually are is someone having the Associated-Press-Newswire sewage-funnel fired into your face by a child-rapist who keeps telling you to "stay free" while behind the scenes he's ramming his phallus down the throats of GCSE students (as reported by The Times, Channel 4, The Mail etc).

 

Russell Brand owns a pub for the love of Zeus!

A pub.

A recovered alcoholic who own a pub.

A messiah who rapes children (as reported in all major newspapers).

 

Is everyone here certain -- and I mean absolutely certain -- they want to get behind Brand and cheerlead him just because he once told you that the World Health Organization were evil? Wow.

But how do we know these claims and accusations are  true? Could be stories made up by the media (who you can never trust to tell you anything truthful) to tarnish Brand even more.

 

I think it's niave to "pick a side"  here, so early on into the scandal.

 

I'm not saying Brand didn't do these horrific things, but to fully believe the tabloids or Channel 4 is very naive.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, octoplex said:

 

You, and others here, have clearly not listened to the the survivors' testimony.

 

Russell Brand's victims include a schoolgirl who was delivered, via BBC chauffeur, from her school lessons to Russell Brand's house. Here, she described how Brand pushed his phallus down her throat until she was unable to breathe. Then to prevent herself from being choked to death by Brand, she had to punch Russell Brand in the stomach as hard as she could. Later, Brand ordered the schoolgirl to sit in a bathtub of water. Leaving the house, Brand demanded that the schoolgirl remain in the cold water until he returned.

 

Being only a CHILD, and already having been nearly choked to death by Brand's phallus, the child shivered until his return.

 

From this you got, "he was their Casanova." and she was " looking for parties, sex, money".

A CHILD.

Jesus. Welcome to society.

 

Thought you were trolling . Now confirmed. 😎

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, octoplex said:

Is everyone here certain -- and I mean absolutely certain -- they want to get behind Brand and cheerlead him just because he once told you that the World Health Organization were evil? Wow.

 

I don't know if he's guilty, but I definitely don't support that subversive. He is part of the convergence of the new right and the new left in my opinion. The guy can jog on, and should take Shapiro, Peterson, Carlson, and Chomsky with him.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jason57 said:

I think it's naive to "pick a side"  here, so early on into the scandal.

I take your broader point, but for many of us, this is not early in the scandal. This is very late.

 

Many of us were onto Brand as child-rapist years ago, and some of that evidence has been raised earlier in this thread. The scandal began, approximately, when Brand began openly-trafficking victims with Jimmy Savile live on a radio show in 2007.

 

We are already sixteen years behind schedule on this operation.

 

 

Edited by octoplex
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...