Jump to content

BBC presenter paying for sexual images


Andy Mac

Recommended Posts

I just watched a really interesting tarot reading from a well known psychic re this situation. If she is right, and she usually is, this will rumble on for months with more accusations in a "me too" type scenario. Many skittles will fall over this one as he has been accused previously.

His career is over, as is Schofield.

The old world is collapsing before our eyes, if we choose to see it.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RobinJ said:

I just watched a really interesting tarot reading from a well known psychic re this situation. If she is right, and she usually is, this will rumble on for months with more accusations in a "me too" type scenario. Many skittles will fall over this one as he has been accused previously.

His career is over, as is Schofield.

The old world is collapsing before our eyes, if we choose to see it.

It certainly is collapsing, the only thing up for debate, is this a 'controlled demolition', an inevitable cycle of the ages, part of the in-built program/simulation, or something else? I am not invested in any of those theories, but when you consider some of the current 'World events' or recent events: depopulation bio-weapon, total economic collapse, possible Great Reset and all that will bring, it is hard to think this is just part of some astrological age. Or perhaps the 'Elite' just carry on in their plans regardless of the other stuff going on, much like a computer virus working in the background with a fixed aim. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

but when you consider some of the current 'World events' or recent events: depopulation bio-weapon, total economic collapse, possible Great Reset and all that will bring,


Mad Max, 2000AD Judge Dredd, Scorched Earth, Megacities etc.

 

Most science fiction is factual interpretations of what the writers have been told the future (now) will be like

Pfizer Documents confirm Deagel’s Shocking 2025 Depopulation Forecast is on Target & not just an Estimation

BY THE EXPOSÉ ON JULY 14, 2023  ( 1 COMMENT )
 
AD39EFA6-82B7-4DC9-B8D7-702883FE6367.webp.69e61892c3f37921b1f266378fd0cce6.webp


 

Don’t say they didn’t warn us 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish to publicly apologise to Basil Brush for speculating that it was him, I said it on a whim and had no real evidence, it was wrong of me to say this Basil, and please accept my apology AND the plain brown envelope packed full of a significant amount of cash that is currently winging it's way to your secret 'bolt hole' in Ashdown Forest!👍

download(1).jpg.b4a5680ebe7f17703c1dcbb091bde98d.jpg

🤫👍

download(6).png.ed50d184681b37bb0cca97b642dd18b6.png

 

Edited by Mr Crabtree
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/12/2023 at 9:00 PM, Mazthehobo said:

Huw naughty boy….once presenter of news at ten…. Now does nudes at ten.

 

im not too fussed about it really. Maybe no crime has been committed but he is a married man and has kids himself. Maybe we just have different values…

 

I wish him a speedy recovery, hopefully he can present the kings funeral precession in a few months.

There will of course have to be three caskets, one each for him and each ear, otherwise they'll never get one extra wide casket down the Mall it would be too wide and would need a tank transporter and outriders!

images(1).jpg.12f358af40800982ec13c4d4aa309a27.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Andy Mac said:

I was watching another live broadcast and Matthew Steeples asked if this GB News presenter had been suspended yet which made me wonder what he was referring to and came across the above broadcast. Willl be interesting to see if anything develops from the allegations which seems to come from his ex boyfirend but have not yet been substaniated

More guessing, Exciting!

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:


Mad Max, 2000AD Judge Dredd, Scorched Earth, Megacities etc.

 

Most science fiction is factual interpretations of what the writers have been told the future (now) will be like

Pfizer Documents confirm Deagel’s Shocking 2025 Depopulation Forecast is on Target & not just an Estimation

BY THE EXPOSÉ ON JULY 14, 2023  ( 1 COMMENT )
 
AD39EFA6-82B7-4DC9-B8D7-702883FE6367.webp.69e61892c3f37921b1f266378fd0cce6.webp


 

Don’t say they didn’t warn us 

Yes, people often dismiss the spiritual aspect, mostly through fear. I myself would have done for most of my life. But the last few years I've had so many experiences in that realm, its undeniable now.

The astrology has predicted much of what we have already been through.

Even quantum science agrees that we are way more than we think. Once you do open up to this aspect you begin to realise that this waking up process is a moving to better ways of life rather than the immense control grid we live under.

I personally think we are in a race to the end now. Spiritual, cabal and planetary shifts all happening at once. It may feel like the cabal are winning because they own media, but that's really not the case at all. We just need to stay firm and help those who are now waking up. There will be a mass awakening very soon.

Edited by RobinJ
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/12/2023 at 7:00 PM, Sidlittle said:

Probably because he saw that interview, which looks like it’s been removed from this thread now , with Shaun Atwood and that bloke who wouldn’t name him but said he was Welsh , a senior news presenter and reported on the coronation. You wouldn’t have to be columbo to figure that out . 

 

Ha ha ha very true. In fact one would have to be very dense not to know who he was.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/12/2023 at 6:05 PM, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

How did you know it was huw edwards so early on? 

 

On 7/12/2023 at 7:00 PM, Sidlittle said:

Probably because he saw that interview, which looks like it’s been removed from this thread now , with Shaun Atwood and that bloke who wouldn’t name him but said he was Welsh , a senior news presenter and reported on the coronation. You wouldn’t have to be columbo to figure that out . 

 

But if you were Columbo you'd have the complete A to Z of it figured out in 70 to 90 minutes !? Actually I would love to see that. Imagine him working out the agenda in this particular episode 😃 Or in other episodes saying to Bojo or Handcock, "just one more thing" 😆 OK ... ok!! Life's not like that, but it made me smile thinking about it for a moment ... And I guess he'd be straight round that 'hospital'. 

 

images.jpeg-10.jpg.acef0d1c473b3870acc01cb0072fbe24.jpgimages.jpeg-9.jpg.aa97842a0718c24efb7aa109ba0728ef.jpg

Edited by Observations
Images
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Observations said:

But if you were Columbo you'd have the complete A to Z of it figured out in 70 to 90 minutes !? Actually I would love to see that. Imagine him working out the agenda in this particular episode 😃 Or in other episodes saying to Bojo or Handcock, "just one more thing" 😆 OK ... ok!! Life's not like that,

 

I loved watching Columbo, I reckon I've exhausted all of his movies by now. :classic_biggrin:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/14/2023 at 4:13 AM, Athenry04 said:

It's all about getting society to accept these deviants, and ridiculous as it sounds, they'll propbably do it. After the last three years, nothing and I mean nothing really would surprise me anymore.

 

That's basically it.

 

As I see, on the surface of things, it would appear that Huw Edwards has done nothing wrong, certainly not from a legal standpoint, hence why the police say no further action can be taken.

 

But the question remains as to whether this was at all appropriate, or decent behaviour, or even 'morally right'.

 

I certainly don't think so, and it makes you wonder, especially as you have all the usual shitlibs rushing to defend or 'offer support'.

 

And like with Philip Schofield, now Huw Edwards is being portrayed as a 'victim' in all of this.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the least we can do is offer our apologies to poor him.

Cause after all the very meaning of an apology has been become almost unrecognisable with the repetition of apologies in the media over the last few years. A deliberate destruction of something else that actually meant something. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To think that people get teased for stamp and coin collecting but it's impressive to show your backside or frontside and it's up to you which one......or what about both? Yeah why not? From doing so you'll get attention, empathy, respect, fame, support, loyalty and more money from the lawsuits.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Useyournous said:

To think that people get teased for stamp and coin collecting but it's impressive to show your backside or frontside and it's up to you which one......or what about both? Yeah why not? From doing so you'll get attention, empathy, respect, fame, support, loyalty and more money from the lawsuits.

 

"Stunning and brave" 🤪

 

It's a twisted messed-up world we live in, where stamp/coin collecting, bird watching, bus/train spotting are activities considered to be 'embarrassing', while paying young men for nude photos is something to be 'proud' of.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

"Stunning and brave" 🤪

 

It's a twisted messed-up world we live in, where stamp/coin collecting, bird watching, bus/train spotting are activities considered to be 'embarrassing', while paying young men for nude photos is something to be 'proud' of.

 

 

 

Well they do call it Pride.

Edited by Ergo Storm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ergo Storm said:

 

Well they do call it Pride.

 

It's funny you say that, because I was thinking the same thing, and it was something I was going to write about on my website!

 

I remember the whole 'Pride' thing about being 'proud to be gay' or something along those lines.

 

Now in recent years 'Pride' is all about 'proud of who you are', or something like that. And as the LGBT 'alphabet' expands, it encompasses ever more 'identities'.

 

It's more than a 'gay movement' now, it is welcoming and 'empowering' ever more what would be considered 'deviancies', ie that which is "considered not normal".

 

For the record, I have no problem with gay or lesbian people, if that's your thing then that's fine with me. They can have their day where they do what they do, and that doesn't bother me in the slightest, as long as I can choose not to be involved.

 

What does bother me, is the 'expectation' that 'non-LGBT+' persons should be expected to 'participate' in such Pride events, so as to be seen as being 'supportive' or 'an ally' of the movement.

 

I'm not a religious person, but there are lines that I will draw between what I consider to be 'morally appropriate behaviour'.

 

As I posted earlier in this thread, Huw Edwards may not have done anything 'legally' wrong, but I don't think it was anything that could be considered to be acceptable, decent or 'morally right'.

 

Is that something really to be 'proud' of?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

It's funny you say that, because I was thinking the same thing, and it was something I was going to write about on my website!

 

I remember the whole 'Pride' thing about being 'proud to be gay' or something along those lines.

 

Now in recent years 'Pride' is all about 'proud of who you are', or something like that. And as the LGBT 'alphabet' expands, it encompasses ever more 'identities'.

 

It's more than a 'gay movement' now, it is welcoming and 'empowering' ever more what would be considered 'deviancies', ie that which is "considered not normal".

 

For the record, I have no problem with gay or lesbian people, if that's your thing then that's fine with me. They can have their day where they do what they do, and that doesn't bother me in the slightest, as long as I can choose not to be involved.

 

What does bother me, is the 'expectation' that 'non-LGBT+' persons should be expected to 'participate' in such Pride events, so as to be seen as being 'supportive' or 'an ally' of the movement.

 

I'm not a religious person, but there are lines that I will draw between what I consider to be 'morally appropriate behaviour'.

 

As I posted earlier in this thread, Huw Edwards may not have done anything 'legally' wrong, but I don't think it was anything that could be considered to be acceptable, decent or 'morally right'.

 

Is that something really to be 'proud' of?

 

 

 

Fifty years ago, there was a point to Gay Pride. We needed to be in people's faces (no, not like that...) to get the same rights as others - like being considered next of kin when your partner was in hospital., not being sacked from a job because of what you did in bed and so on. These days, all that has been achieved and, if anything, "all that alphabet" has more rights than straight people - which is wrong. There is no point to Pride any more - it's just a stupid commercialised woke piece of nonsense like Mother's Day, Halloween or all the World "you name it" days.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The purpose of the Huw story, of course, is yet more inversion and subversion.

 

What really ought to be a simple case of "respected BBC news anchor caught paying for XXX pics from a teenager, loses job in process" has somehow - surprise surprise! - turned into a very odd, public psy-op that plays with conventions of what is acceptable behaviour, what a public figure's responsibilities should be, and what can be said about it by anyone (including the media).

 

But this will rumble on as the scriptwriters feed more "names" into the narrative and go on some fun (ie tedious) detours along the way, boring senseless anybody left with a functioning brain.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, k_j_evans said:

Fifty years ago, there was a point to Gay Pride. We needed to be in people's faces (no, not like that...) to get the same rights as others - like being considered next of kin when your partner was in hospital., not being sacked from a job because of what you did in bed and so on. These days, all that has been achieved and, if anything, "all that alphabet" has more rights than straight people - which is wrong. There is no point to Pride any more - it's just a stupid commercialised woke piece of nonsense like Mother's Day, Halloween or all the World "you name it" days.

I remember when NAMBLA applied to march in the San Francisco pride parade (about 1983 or so). They were given short shrift by the organizers. Randy Shilts wrote a scathing piece in the SF Chronicle lambasting NAMBLA for trying to coattail onto the parade, stating that it would give legitimacy to child molesters. But nowadays, minor attracted persons are welcomed with open arms. AIDS killed off a lot of the old gay rights stalwarts leaving a vacuum into which opportunists and chancers to fill the void.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...