Jump to content

Oceangate sub and missing billionaire


Mikhail Liebestein

Recommended Posts

Here it is the answer:
 

 

It was a ritual sacrifice. It was the implosion of the last natural seed and the RISE of the seed of the Titans out of the abyss, the same Nephilim, just as the days of Noah. 

The submarine looks like a grain of rice (there is a play on words with "rise"). The Pakistani businessman that died underwater was the vice-chairman of Engro Corporation that was working on a hybrid seed program. This created a conflict for Monsanto in Pakistan, that also produces hybrid seeds.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

So they're parading the wreckage now. Couldn't find a trace of anything last week, now they've got the actual imploded vessel.

 

Yes they could, US Navy picked up the implosion, they didn't go public with it because it was by the underwater monitoring equipment for detecting threats to the North American coastline.  
 

As for physically locating the sub: you realise how dark it is down there?  The debris of the sub (which is relatively small) probably mixed in with the debris of the Titanic, isn't a small area to search!


Don't forget they had to get ROVs to the site in the first place, it takes a few days to get them there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Morpheus said:

Of course, but let's remember the navy heard that shit go kaboom on Sunday and the press ran with that shit for 4 days, creating false hope of a rescue. A fuckin joke from the start. 

The media are just doing their normal thing: over dramatising everything as usual, generating clicks on their websites, selling newspapers and influencing viewing figures on the television!  The "distractions" generate them revenue.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nefaria said:

The media are just doing their normal thing: over dramatising everything as usual, generating clicks on their websites, selling newspapers and influencing viewing figures on the television!  The "distractions" generate them revenue.

They're responsible for a little more than that, but sure. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Nefaria said:

The media are just doing their normal thing: over dramatising everything as usual, generating clicks on their websites, selling newspapers and influencing viewing figures on the television!  The "distractions" generate them revenue.

They're not called the 'mockingbird media' for nothing. The things you mention are a mere bagatelle.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be nuts to not think there is something more to this whole 'story'. With the 'elites' baying for total control and power, and the recent history of media being totally bought and paid for by the tiny percent, anything given such 'coverage' should be looked at more closely imho. Do the media run stories that are not influenced by the 'elite'? Of course they do, just like the Police and Courts do some actual work when the cases involve those they have no vested interest in that is. But stories that are being run with such vast coverage in all media outlets across the World at the same time? Doubtful. 

 

So whether this was a 'ritual sacrifice', has hidden or symbolic meaning, or those onboard were targeted, something is likely behind all this. What better way than to target your enemies; create expensive and exclusive 'missions' and because of their exclusivity you can ensure that more than one enemy is onboard. Or perhaps there was a hidden message in this; given the financial system right now, words like 'implosion', 'sinking', 'running out of oxygen' could even mean the bubble is about to burst, there could be many messages here. In Hindi 'Titan' is also the largest satellite or moon of Saturn. Who knows, but something given so much coverage is unlikely to be pure coincidence, even if it is only to send a symbolic or unconscious message to the masses - 'stay safe in your home. Wealth cannot protect you from danger'. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Gluoniel said:

The sub was called Titan from that OceanGate company. Only with these names, it caught my attention about any symbolic or ritualistic meaning. The Titanic of course is another subject of conspiracy. OceanGate sounds like it must be referring to an oceanic portal. So yes, it was a ritual to open a portal for the Titans (Nephilim).

 

You could be right.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

So whether this was a 'ritual sacrifice', has hidden or symbolic meaning, or those onboard were targeted, something is likely behind all this.

I'm betting it's poor design and  structural failure

Edited by peter
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2023 at 3:22 PM, Gluoniel said:

Here it is the answer:
 

 

It was a ritual sacrifice. It was the implosion of the last natural seed and the RISE of the seed of the Titans out of the abyss, the same Nephilim, just as the days of Noah. 

The submarine looks like a grain of rice (there is a play on words with "rise"). The Pakistani businessman that died underwater was the vice-chairman of Engro Corporation that was working on a hybrid seed program. This created a conflict for Monsanto in Pakistan, that also produces hybrid seeds.

Are you sure this is the answer? I think this utube vid is a conspiracy (to take advantage of a terrible situation in the form of click bait ,just to generate money from someones misery),how nice

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Nefaria said:

Who calls them the "mockingbird media" I haven't heard that expression before.

 

I doubt your view that them selling newspapers and generating revenue from advertising is of little value to them, without it they would be out of business.

It isn't of "little value" or wouldn't be to a truly independent competitive media. Trouble is the media is now held in the hands of a few mega-corporations who use it as a tool for ramming the agenda of the elite down our throats. If you want to see it in commercial terms, the media has been a loss leader for them. As for mockingbird media, research Operation Mockingbird, and the planting of intelligence assets in the media. I'm sure the UK does the same.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That guy investigation is crucial. That absolutely is not any clickbait, a clickbait would repeating the same information and maybe providing a simple theory like saying it was a faux event without any additional investigation.

 

No, man, this guy is very informative. He checked the information about the Pakistani Vice-chair of the Engro corporation. He read about the upcoming hybrid seed program of Engro, the conflict with Monsanto hybrid seeds in Pakistan, also the important esoteric meaning of the term "hybrid seed", he discovered that the submarine was shaped like a grain of rice. The important clue of the names OceanGate and Titan, etc.

 

Man, that's not clickbait.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, peter said:

I'm betting it's poor design and  structural failure

It certainly could be Peter, but it doesn't mean that it wasn't also planned, or that there is something bigger behind the whole thing. One thought that occurred to me in the first day or two from the way the stories were being 'portrayed' was that there appeared to be an 'implied' idea that there should be greater controls on these types of 'operators', in that greater Government control would be placed on these designers and operators. Like everything, it is another way that those 'in power' can control the wealth by limiting those who want to be innovative and explore more of this 'planet'. They wouldn't want anyone not in their club discovering 'secrets' or resources now would they. 

 

I am not saying it is definitely so, it is just one theory of many, but consider it from the Problem - Reaction - Solution idea;

 

Problem - People with wealth that are not part of 'our club' are starting to invent things that allow them to explore areas of the Earth that up until now, were exclusive areas of their domain. They might stumble across hidden knowledge, proof that 'his-story' is not as we have been taught, or they may discover vast resources of great wealth.

 

Reaction - Create something like an 'OceanGate disaster' 

 

Solution - Greater 'control' of those not in the club, with tighter design patents and tighter restrictions. 

 

Voila - job done. 

Edited by BornFreeNowAgain
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

It certainly could be Peter, but it doesn't mean that it wasn't also planned, or that there is something bigger behind the whole thing. One thought that occurred to me in the first day or two from the way the stories were being 'portrayed' was that there appeared to be an 'implied' idea that there should be greater controls on these types of 'operators', in that greater Government control would be placed on these designers and operators. Like everything, it is another way that those 'in power' can control the wealth by limiting those who want to be innovative and explore more of this 'planet'. They wouldn't want anyone not in their club discovering 'secrets' or resources now would they. 

If you looked at this solely from a government  control perspective I feel that your assumption is certainly valid, however if you look at it from a public safety view point I feel more regulation with regards to rigorous testing would not be unreasonable particularly when life and limb are concerned.

Personally I think where your argument falls down in this particular case is the fact that the only people that will be affected by said extra regulation are the very wealthy who can afford a seat and the people with the means to provide the service and therefore the average Joe is not affected and in all honesty I don't think they would (Problem Reaction Solution) themselves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This video is in French but if you fiddle around with the settings, it will auto-generate English subtitles. The speaker,  Michel Chevalet has based his conclusions on the  US Navy's recording of the implosion, which he obtained from the EarthScope Consortium. Apparently, they were aware that he sub was breaking up and that the two hulls managed to last for 25 minutes intact until the ultimate implosion. The carbon fibre hull developed a crack letting pressure onto the inner steel hull that compressed the pressure in the cabin before it imploded. Horrible way to go.
 

 

Edited by Nemuri Kyoshiro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

This video is in French but if you fiddle around with the settings, it will auto-generate English subtitles. The speaker,  Michel Chevalet has based his conclusions on the  US Navy's recording of the implosion, which he obtained from the EarthScope Consortium. Apparently, they were aware that he sub was breaking up and that the two hulls managed to last for 25 minutes intact until the ultimate implosion. The carbon fibre hull developed a crack letting pressure onto the inner steel hull that compressed the pressure in the cabin before it imploded. Horrible way to go.
 

 

Interesting video, so they reckon they had 20 minutes of knowing they were about to die?  That must have been awful, especially for the father and son.  I was wondering if it had been the porthole that gave way first.  I don't think the diagram they use is accurate though, wasn't there at titanium end cap before the tail section, the tail part was just for aesthetics and hid the electronics and sensor equipment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, peter said:

If you looked at this solely from a government  control perspective I feel that your assumption is certainly valid, however if you look at it from a public safety view point I feel more regulation with regards to rigorous testing would not be unreasonable particularly when life and limb are concerned.

Personally I think where your argument falls down in this particular case is the fact that the only people that will be affected by said extra regulation are the very wealthy who can afford a seat and the people with the means to provide the service and therefore the average Joe is not affected and in all honesty I don't think they would (Problem Reaction Solution) themselves

Who knows Peter, as I say it is just one of many possibilities. But I think the way that the narrative unfolded is interesting and there are rarely any coincidences when it comes to the 'stories' the MSM choose to focus on. In the first few days the narrative was about how unsafe this sub was, and how it had not passed all the testing, as well as how much the 'rescue operation' was costing, when these people were billionaires. 

 

We know that with technology and the internet, many more millionaires and billionaires are being 'created'. In years gone by, millionaires and billionaires were easy to spot and infiltrate and perhaps be lets say co-opted in to 'a club'. There was more control over these people in the past I reckon. Now we have people who can come from nowhere and become millionaires so quickly. At the same time, technology has advanced so quickly that it won't be long before some wealthy people start to explore areas of the Earth that were previously only explored by military. I am never attached to any idea I have, I only care about the 'truth', but I cannot help feeling that intuitively there is something here about making sure that those mavericks not controlled by the 'Elites' are stopped from doing these sorts of expeditions. 'They' managed that with the patenting system in the past, and it would not surprise me if this is another way to keep control. We will know more over the coming months where the direction of this goes. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Incontinentia_Buttux said:

Apart from the bottom of the oceans, which are inhospitable anyway and impractical to exploit, i fail to see how the majority of the earth's surface is unexplored.

 

1 hour ago, TheConsultant said:

In terms of truthful public knowledge?


Most public information is misinformation and thus propaganda. So its less "unexplored" and more obfuscated from public knowledge. Where do you find Rothschild Island?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Incontinentia_Buttux said:

Interesting video, so they reckon they had 20 minutes of knowing they were about to die?  That must have been awful, especially for the father and son.  I was wondering if it had been the porthole that gave way first.  I don't think the diagram they use is accurate though, wasn't there at titanium end cap before the tail section, the tail part was just for aesthetics and hid the electronics and sensor equipment.

The graphics do look a bit misleading as you say. There would have been nobody in the aft section and that takes away a bit from the video. The crushed can analogy was a bit much too but I don't know much about what's considered good or bad taste on French TV. Would the hull have withstood that amount of pressure for 20 minutes after a fissure appeared in the carbon fibre outer hull? I wonder. I would have guessed that it would have happened a lot faster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...