DannyUK Posted June 5, 2023 Share Posted June 5, 2023 (edited) Funny Holly calls out Phil over recent issues #phillipschofield #hollywilloughby #itv #ai #deepfake There’s definitely a lot more to this than meets the eye. All this sensationalism and internet to mainstream media crossover will be used in some way to justify more censorship of the net. To suggest some sort of oversight and accountability. Which basically means Orwellian censorship. This is script and a controlled release which has been blown all out of proportion to justify exactly that. The pantomime to introduce a new level of internet censorship. This is how easy it should be to see through their BS. Something very deceptive appears to be being run in the media when it comes to Phillip Schofield and everything associated. It has been dragged out for far too long and has turned news into gossip, ever since the whole queue jumping sensationalism. It has been taking over news for so long now that it really should be questioned why this has gone on for so long, jumping from one bit of sensationalism to another surrounding Phillip Schofield - maybe they’ve overplayed their hand - and has to be considered front page news? Have an investigation and be done with it. Instead this situation is being turned into a circus. For those who were deaf dumb and blind before to see Phillip Schofield falseness and narcism should now be able to see it. But, if you’re still blind, deaf and dumb then he is “the victim” and if you believe that I really don’t know how you got here… Get over it and move on. It appears to me to be a scripted attempt to frame the media and information sharing. Particularly, it seems to be about censorship or that’s where this is leading under the umbrella of controlling “fake news”, “hate speech” or “information that is said could cause harm”. The framing I expect is being run through this event as one main example and quite deliberately so as part of a script. It will be said that certain information the mainstream media handled a certain way because of such oversight. However, certain information could be and was being shared far more freely over the internet, particularly social media. Without any oversight or questions as to what “harms” such information sharing could cause and that people do this too easily without a care as to what damage it may do and that basically this needs to change so we ultimately censor ourselves by not expressing ourselves this way over the net. As much may not be stated but this is whats going on. I think it’s too far a jump for the “experts” to understand there’s a link between the mainstream and social media here… That, simply because of the mainstream media, people would seek out this info online, share more information and simply discuss it further simply because this was being discussed within mainstream media. That maybe a “conspiracy theory” if you see that connection. As you’re obviously not supposed to see links anywhere, only the ones they want you to see and it’s called the official narrative of everything. Just blame the internet and social media and demand censorship by removing the context and suggest this wouldn’t have couldn’t have taken place if the internet had such “oversight to prevent harms”. It will eventually be said that this information was crucial and damaging, leading to or contributing to some sort of “harm”. That’s because this situation is in my opinion, is controlled and contrived to achieve some form of censorship of the net. As any information TPTB simply don’t like and don’t want sharing around can be censored on the grounds of such potentially causing “harm” not simply because it’s factually incorrect, inaccurate or apparently taken out of context. As often times, people are censored for spreading so called “fake news” that’s actually not fake at all but is currently used as a censorship tool because that’s what’s available to censor. This type of censorship often try’s to hide something as being false and then links to something else completely irrelevant/out of context as to what’s been posted or in another language. Most people under the mind spell of these external authoritarians won’t go this far, see something as false and so choose to ignore it. They want to change this to not make this form of censorship appear as foolish as it obviously appears to those who can see this, where they have no grounds to censor something as being “fake news” because it’s perfectly true and accurate and as such, can do so because the information can be said to be damaging leading to “real world harms, this platform is seeking to prevent” because big brother cares about you It can also be used as a tool to justify penalising “fake news” or so called “conspiracy theory research”/alternative views/opinions by holding both individuals to account and platforms. Seek to deplatform those individuals they don’t like based purely on the fact they simply don’t like narratives they’re putting forward. This is quite obviously a deceptive war being waged upon our freedom of speech and it’s obviously not just limited to any one nation. This is akin to getting WOKE clones pissing everyone off by holding up traffic under false phoney pretences of “Climate Change peace activism” to then introducing anti-protest laws, so the police state can take “the wrong type of people” off the streets, for simply holding “the wrong views”. Just as the police did during the cloned King’s Coronation. The likes of Caroline’s Law will be introduced into this. Some sort of add on to the snoopers charter/IP BILL. Obviously the Online Safety Bill - Enabling further powers of surveillance from the above and completely removing the freedoms of the net and the free flow of information. It’s for “the children”… Something of this nature seems timely with trying to tie this into “Prince Harry’s” war upon reshaping the media. This is all globalist censorship and is something to look out for and research more deeply if anything of the sort starts to transpire. It does all seem to be all coming together right now to achieve an end. Likely to correct certain “failures in censorship” during our previous global training censorship exercise called the Coronavirus Plandemic… Exactly. A few years ago and it would appear shocking and be seen for what it is by the majority. But instead, we have the woke mob actually demanding people be “deplatformed”. It will be the same with the likes of phone companies if they did actually start doing the same a few years from now, people just accept it become complacent, whilst denying there’s any “conspiracy” to ensure conformity. I do recommend that this whole issue surrounding Phillip Schofield is a catalyst to achieve mass censorship through the act of sensationalism over gossip turned into news, whilst otherwise alternative opinions can be silenced under the pretence of “fake news” and not just “harmful” but “potentially harmful” being used as tools of Orwellian censorship. The whole reason gossip has been allowed within “the news” over the issue of Phillip Schofield is because it has been designed as the perfect example, in achieving certain ends within the scope of “preventing online harms” point out “the dangers of social media” and this form of information sharing “without oversight” or “punishment” for those who don’t care or don’t think about the implications of their actions and what they do and say online. You get the idea being presented here… Of course, it is a complete farce setup to justify censorship. “I was saying this ages ago, even before he jumped the queue.” #standup #comedy #standupcomic #comedian #comedians #phillipschofield #thismorning #itv #hollywilloughby #schofield #schofe #fyp https://www.facebook.com/reel/579495180979227 What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." In 1984, Huxley added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us. ~Neil Postman (Book: Amusing Ourselves to Death https://amzn.to/3HDVvay) (Art: Collage by Joe Webb) Both are taking place. It’s all about control and methods of torture, fluctuating between taking something away and then giving it back, until you surrender your mind to those doing the torturing and become passive towards their imposition, you become hypnotised. The end goal being total control. The information isn’t so much concealed, it’s available for all those who want to see it, yet the context is what’s removed or lied about, people will believe what they want to believe. Usually doing whatever’s the easiest option. The narrative given is to make people indifferent, passive with the controllers agenda, so long as they have a justifiable explanation they’ll accept absolutely anything, so people will love their own confinement and place their passion within trivial outlets based upon social conditioning. They’ll do what’s expected of them, come to love it or fear what other people may think and feel about them if they see through the spell, speak of it or try to do anything differently. Edited June 5, 2023 by DannyUK 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonlight Posted June 6, 2023 Share Posted June 6, 2023 ...and Berlin police are investigating against Roger Waters for wearing the wrong shirt on his German Concert tour....this world is crazy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted June 6, 2023 Author Share Posted June 6, 2023 (edited) Holly Willoughby makes first This Morning appearance since Phillip Schofield's departure | ITV News A message to you, from Holly | This Morning “What unites us all now is a desire to heal, for the health and well being of everyone…” Mental Health - Harms - Online Safety UK to introduce world first online safety laws The Government today unveiled tough new measures to ensure the UK is the safest place in the world to be online. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-to-introduce-world-first-online-safety-laws ONLINE HARMS: FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION REMAINS UNDER THREAT https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/online-harms-freedom-of-expression-remains-under-threat/ ONLINE HARMS: ENCRYPTION UNDER ATTACK https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/online-harms-encryption-under-attack/ 'FAKE' Holly Willoughby 'DESTROYED' Phillip Schofield | What Just Happened? With Kevin O'Sullivan Edited June 6, 2023 by DannyUK 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted June 6, 2023 Author Share Posted June 6, 2023 (edited) 3 hours ago, Moonlight said: ...and Berlin police are investigating against Roger Waters for wearing the wrong shirt on his German Concert tour....this world is crazy Yep, censorship and propaganda go hand in hand… Protest song edit - Rage Against The Machine Killing In The Name Roger Waters - Reporting The Truth It’s obviously an excuse for TPTB so they can exercise force over an individual. It has nothing to do with the reason they’ve conjured up to achieve it that should seem like madness to someone who’s sane. They’ll do anything of the likes they believe they can get away with to shut someone down if “you’re saying the wrong things/promoting the wrong sort of behaviour”. Likewise, this situation surrounding Schofield has little to do with the pretext of constantly circulating gossip, opinions and such surrounding this. It’s gone on way too long and is all out of proportion. I’m suggesting the reason for this is because of trying to achieve certain ideals through the event and all this sensationalism is the groundwork. Censorship “through preventing harm” by the use/access of the internet, conjuring up mental health and obviously exploiting the children, “oh won’t someone please think of the children” - hysteria. Through such a campaign this will eventually be used to actually prevent the exposure of pedophiles and those speaking out about government agendas. Whats happening now is to captivate attention this doesn’t deserve so this can be exploited later. This is just my feeling and opinion watching what’s taking place… Crown The Empire - Machines (Official Music Video) David Bowie the link between Transhumanism and Transgender ⚧ Agenda - Mind Control - What are “The Cobalt Wars”? - Black Noise/Sound Bomb Club of Rome “Sustainable Development” Scam Our Traditional Enemies of the Truth… Roger Waters faces attacks by Zionists, Labour and Tory politicians as tour hits UK https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/06/04/zfqq-j04.html Edited June 6, 2023 by DannyUK 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted June 6, 2023 Share Posted June 6, 2023 Excellent work as ever, Danny. This is a very sinister business all round. Hollyby is like some nightmare Stepford wife. Nothing but darkness and emptiness in there. Schofe is ghastly, but she ain't far behind. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webtrekker Posted June 6, 2023 Share Posted June 6, 2023 I see that yesterday Holly was dressed in pure white as she gave her 'speech' sitting to the right of Josie on the screen. Today, Holly has taken Schofield's position on the left of the screen and Josie has been demoted to second in command. Didn't take long for her to get back in business, did it! 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluke Posted June 6, 2023 Share Posted June 6, 2023 I said it in the thread I wonder if this is more to do with an excuse of censorship. As you said, just investigate through police. Not a fan of witch hunts to be honest and all the GB news Dan Wotton stuff Eamon Holmes just saying he was a narcissist well Its not exactly a surprise to anyone with half a Braincell. Can't remember who it was but someone on here also made a great post about them focussing on the words deceit and lying etc. Is he a nonce or not lol. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saved Posted June 7, 2023 Share Posted June 7, 2023 Made me smile. However, it's all a circus and along with the Bulley psyop and Harry will be used as an excuse to publicly wield the online safety bill - especially when brave Phil tells all how he was nearly driven to self deletion by online homophobes. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted June 7, 2023 Author Share Posted June 7, 2023 (edited) It’s a contrived situation and here is someone else making similar statements/analysis. SCHOFIELD AND THE ONLINE SAFETY BILL: MY THEORY What I believe “the smoking gun” - Plant, part of a counterintelligence operation - in all of this is, the individual he had an affair with. The mainstream media circulated information in censored way in both speech and when showing images. Upon social media we have had the same images circulated but showing the guys face and this can be said to be too invasive which has led to more details being dug up on this individual. This can be tied into the likes of the phone hacking situation and the likes being discussed through Prince Harry and this court case. Prince Harry is just being used as a tool/vehicle. Hopefully not that many people here are that stupid, we know this situation isn’t black and white and no one wants to be terrorised and constantly followed around by the media, if where and when this type of thing takes place. It very obviously did when Diana was still alive and yet all this time nothing was done about it - my view is the royals themselves used the media as a weapon against Diana when she had started to outlive her usefulness, whilst the same people even Diana herself are quite happy to exploit the media for their own ends and then bitch about it when the media works against them - and we have this history being dug up and thrown at us today, aided and abetted by a number of actors to aid push this issue which is linked within this current Online Safety Bill. this situation is working to exploit real world issues of harassment and invasions of privacy by the media, to then bring in and justify mass censorship, predominantly upon the internet by creating a contrived situation to be used as the perfect example. It is my view that the contrived situation and perfect example is this situation with Phillip Schofield and all that’s involved with this sensationalist news. George Clooney is a Big Brad Pitt Fan and Terrible Roommate // Omaze Metal Gear Archons - A.I. Technocracy - Bill Gates Brave New Virtual World The Internet - Cloud “Jesus” is the Ghost in the Machine Golden Gate Bridge - Closing the Gates of Heaven - Kundalini Crown Chakra/“Corona” Virus - EE33 - *Extinction Entity/*Evolution Entity They Want To Read Your Brain Waves The GIrl With the Dragon Tattoo Opening Title Sequence - David Fincher Movie (2011) HD Prince Harry speaks out at ‘critical moment’ for children’s online safety https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/may/16/prince-harry-speaks-out-at-critical-moment-for-childrens-online-safety Edited June 7, 2023 by DannyUK 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velma Posted June 7, 2023 Share Posted June 7, 2023 12 hours ago, Fluke said: Can't remember who it was but someone on here also made a great post about them focussing on the words deceit and lying etc. Is he a nonce or not lol. here: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted June 14, 2023 Share Posted June 14, 2023 Itv were invited to speak in Parliament to a committee and it's been on from 10 am till 12. Where this is all going ... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted July 1, 2023 Author Share Posted July 1, 2023 (edited) On 6/5/2023 at 1:01 PM, DannyUK said: Funny Holly calls out Phil over recent issues #phillipschofield #hollywilloughby #itv #ai #deepfake There’s definitely a lot more to this than meets the eye. All this sensationalism and internet to mainstream media crossover will be used in some way to justify more censorship of the net. To suggest some sort of oversight and accountability. Which basically means Orwellian censorship. This is script and a controlled release which has been blown all out of proportion to justify exactly that. The pantomime to introduce a new level of internet censorship. This is how easy it should be to see through their BS. Something very deceptive appears to be being run in the media when it comes to Phillip Schofield and everything associated. It has been dragged out for far too long and has turned news into gossip, ever since the whole queue jumping sensationalism. It has been taking over news for so long now that it really should be questioned why this has gone on for so long, jumping from one bit of sensationalism to another surrounding Phillip Schofield - maybe they’ve overplayed their hand - and has to be considered front page news? Have an investigation and be done with it. Instead this situation is being turned into a circus. For those who were deaf dumb and blind before to see Phillip Schofield falseness and narcism should now be able to see it. But, if you’re still blind, deaf and dumb then he is “the victim” and if you believe that I really don’t know how you got here… Get over it and move on. It appears to me to be a scripted attempt to frame the media and information sharing. Particularly, it seems to be about censorship or that’s where this is leading under the umbrella of controlling “fake news”, “hate speech” or “information that is said could cause harm”. The framing I expect is being run through this event as one main example and quite deliberately so as part of a script. It will be said that certain information the mainstream media handled a certain way because of such oversight. However, certain information could be and was being shared far more freely over the internet, particularly social media. Without any oversight or questions as to what “harms” such information sharing could cause and that people do this too easily without a care as to what damage it may do and that basically this needs to change so we ultimately censor ourselves by not expressing ourselves this way over the net. As much may not be stated but this is whats going on. I think it’s too far a jump for the “experts” to understand there’s a link between the mainstream and social media here… That, simply because of the mainstream media, people would seek out this info online, share more information and simply discuss it further simply because this was being discussed within mainstream media. That maybe a “conspiracy theory” if you see that connection. As you’re obviously not supposed to see links anywhere, only the ones they want you to see and it’s called the official narrative of everything. Just blame the internet and social media and demand censorship by removing the context and suggest this wouldn’t have couldn’t have taken place if the internet had such “oversight to prevent harms”. It will eventually be said that this information was crucial and damaging, leading to or contributing to some sort of “harm”. That’s because this situation is in my opinion, is controlled and contrived to achieve some form of censorship of the net. As any information TPTB simply don’t like and don’t want sharing around can be censored on the grounds of such potentially causing “harm” not simply because it’s factually incorrect, inaccurate or apparently taken out of context. As often times, people are censored for spreading so called “fake news” that’s actually not fake at all but is currently used as a censorship tool because that’s what’s available to censor. This type of censorship often try’s to hide something as being false and then links to something else completely irrelevant/out of context as to what’s been posted or in another language. Most people under the mind spell of these external authoritarians won’t go this far, see something as false and so choose to ignore it. They want to change this to not make this form of censorship appear as foolish as it obviously appears to those who can see this, where they have no grounds to censor something as being “fake news” because it’s perfectly true and accurate and as such, can do so because the information can be said to be damaging leading to “real world harms, this platform is seeking to prevent” because big brother cares about you It can also be used as a tool to justify penalising “fake news” or so called “conspiracy theory research”/alternative views/opinions by holding both individuals to account and platforms. Seek to deplatform those individuals they don’t like based purely on the fact they simply don’t like narratives they’re putting forward. This is quite obviously a deceptive war being waged upon our freedom of speech and it’s obviously not just limited to any one nation. This is akin to getting WOKE clones pissing everyone off by holding up traffic under false phoney pretences of “Climate Change peace activism” to then introducing anti-protest laws, so the police state can take “the wrong type of people” off the streets, for simply holding “the wrong views”. Just as the police did during the cloned King’s Coronation. The likes of Caroline’s Law will be introduced into this. Some sort of add on to the snoopers charter/IP BILL. Obviously the Online Safety Bill - Enabling further powers of surveillance from the above and completely removing the freedoms of the net and the free flow of information. It’s for “the children”… Something of this nature seems timely with trying to tie this into “Prince Harry’s” war upon reshaping the media. This is all globalist censorship and is something to look out for and research more deeply if anything of the sort starts to transpire. It does all seem to be all coming together right now to achieve an end. Likely to correct certain “failures in censorship” during our previous global training censorship exercise called the Coronavirus Plandemic… Exactly. A few years ago and it would appear shocking and be seen for what it is by the majority. But instead, we have the woke mob actually demanding people be “deplatformed”. It will be the same with the likes of phone companies if they did actually start doing the same a few years from now, people just accept it become complacent, whilst denying there’s any “conspiracy” to ensure conformity. I do recommend that this whole issue surrounding Phillip Schofield is a catalyst to achieve mass censorship through the act of sensationalism over gossip turned into news, whilst otherwise alternative opinions can be silenced under the pretence of “fake news” and not just “harmful” but “potentially harmful” being used as tools of Orwellian censorship. The whole reason gossip has been allowed within “the news” over the issue of Phillip Schofield is because it has been designed as the perfect example, in achieving certain ends within the scope of “preventing online harms” point out “the dangers of social media” and this form of information sharing “without oversight” or “punishment” for those who don’t care or don’t think about the implications of their actions and what they do and say online. You get the idea being presented here… Of course, it is a complete farce setup to justify censorship. “I was saying this ages ago, even before he jumped the queue.” #standup #comedy #standupcomic #comedian #comedians #phillipschofield #thismorning #itv #hollywilloughby #schofield #schofe #fyp https://www.facebook.com/reel/579495180979227 What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." In 1984, Huxley added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us. ~Neil Postman (Book: Amusing Ourselves to Death https://amzn.to/3HDVvay) (Art: Collage by Joe Webb) Both are taking place. It’s all about control and methods of torture, fluctuating between taking something away and then giving it back, until you surrender your mind to those doing the torturing and become passive towards their imposition, you become hypnotised. The end goal being total control. The information isn’t so much concealed, it’s available for all those who want to see it, yet the context is what’s removed or lied about, people will believe what they want to believe. Usually doing whatever’s the easiest option. The narrative given is to make people indifferent, passive with the controllers agenda, so long as they have a justifiable explanation they’ll accept absolutely anything, so people will love their own confinement and place their passion within trivial outlets based upon social conditioning. They’ll do what’s expected of them, come to love it or fear what other people may think and feel about them if they see through the spell, speak of it or try to do anything differently. Hacking trial: Prince Harry claims £441,000 in damages for 33 articles https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66070127 Yep 33 ITV chief concerned for mental health of 'hounded' Phillip Schofield Dame Carolyn McCall defends channel's handling of affair during select committee grilling https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/14/itv-paying-for-philip-schofield-and-young-lovers-counsellin/ This Morning star warns trolls as concerns grow over Phillip Schofield's mental health Dr Ranj admitted he was disappointed by Schofield's affair, but expressed fears for his mental wellbeing. https://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/1784420/Dr-Ranj-warns-trolls-Phillip-Schofield-s-mental-health "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." Spirit In The Sky - Norman Greenbaum (Official Lyric Video) Meet Your Strawman “Millionaires don't need astrologers, billionaires do”- JP Morgan Reenforcing laws of the sea/zodiac. Laws of the sea, contractual law treat you as a CORPSE - Corporation/Dead - presumed dead, lost at sea. This fraud/treason took over the banking system when the federal reserve entered. Those big wigs who where apparently against this where said to be on Titanic… The same time as all this carry on with “the lost sub”, we have interest rates hiked as we enter further down the road of their hunger games society to transform society into their new technocracy. Their Digitised Society. A sub is also another term for lending someone money It’s also another way of suggesting we are all submissive to this and all in all, it is a complete and utter mockery of anyone with a brain not a STRAWMAN. The Wizard of Oz.........What it really means! Jordan Maxwell David Icke, Jobs, Employment, Money, Government Creed - Signs This is not about age Time served on the earth Doesn't mean you grow in mind This is not about god Spiritual insinuations seem To shock our nation Come with me I'm fading Underneath the lights Come with me Come with me Come with me now This is not about race It's a decision to stop the Division in your life This is not about sex We all know sex sells and The whole world is buying Come with me I'm fading Underneath the lights Come with me Come with me Come with me now Can't you see the signs? See the signs now Can't you see them? See the signs You see them All the signs we see them Can't you see them? Hell is for Heroes 1962 The Mechanic 1972 Edited July 1, 2023 by DannyUK 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted July 1, 2023 Author Share Posted July 1, 2023 (edited) 9 hours ago, DannyUK said: Hacking trial: Prince Harry claims £441,000 in damages for 33 articles https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66070127 Yep 33 ITV chief concerned for mental health of 'hounded' Phillip Schofield Dame Carolyn McCall defends channel's handling of affair during select committee grilling https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/14/itv-paying-for-philip-schofield-and-young-lovers-counsellin/ This Morning star warns trolls as concerns grow over Phillip Schofield's mental health Dr Ranj admitted he was disappointed by Schofield's affair, but expressed fears for his mental wellbeing. https://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/1784420/Dr-Ranj-warns-trolls-Phillip-Schofield-s-mental-health "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." Spirit In The Sky - Norman Greenbaum (Official Lyric Video) Meet Your Strawman “Millionaires don't need astrologers, billionaires do”- JP Morgan Reenforcing laws of the sea/zodiac. Laws of the sea, contractual law treat you as a CORPSE - Corporation/Dead - presumed dead, lost at sea. This fraud/treason took over the banking system when the federal reserve entered. Those big wigs who where apparently against this where said to be on Titanic… The same time as all this carry on with “the lost sub”, we have interest rates hiked as we enter further down the road of their hunger games society to transform society into their new technocracy. Their Digitised Society. A sub is also another term for lending someone money It’s also another way of suggesting we are all submissive to this and all in all, it is a complete and utter mockery of anyone with a brain not a STRAWMAN. The Wizard of Oz.........What it really means! Jordan Maxwell David Icke, Jobs, Employment, Money, Government Creed - Signs This is not about age Time served on the earth Doesn't mean you grow in mind This is not about god Spiritual insinuations seem To shock our nation Come with me I'm fading Underneath the lights Come with me Come with me Come with me now This is not about race It's a decision to stop the Division in your life This is not about sex We all know sex sells and The whole world is buying Come with me I'm fading Underneath the lights Come with me Come with me Come with me now Can't you see the signs? See the signs now Can't you see them? See the signs You see them All the signs we see them Can't you see them? Hell is for Heroes 1962 The Mechanic 1972 “Babylon” - Kali/Cali - Mara Anti-Hero - Taylor Swift Monster Strawman: The Nature of the Cage - Trailer Are You a Slave? Kings of Leon - Crawl “Birth Day” - The Game What do you get for the man who only thinks he has everything? You show him he what he has lost for it, you show him he has nothing. The Game 1997 “People of the Korn…” Korn - Blind The Occult Knowledge was buried within secret society’s to stop the throne from being challenged. So society can be managed from behind the scenes, the worlds a stage and we live within The Wizard of Oz. A veil was produced and drapped over the face of everything. People are blind to what’s beyond that veil. The surface of that veil becomes what people believe and have been indoctrinated into seeing the world as. The occult knowledge is old, ancient and that knowledge has been kept from people to stop people from being able to identify with what is, so their world can be micromanaged and they can become prisoner to an illusion of self and their idea of reality! Their ego/phantom self and strawman are all really the same thing. My Own Prison Are you a strawman, a work of legalese fiction designed to rob you of your senses? Or are you a real boy? Pinocchio A Real Boy The Mayan Creation Myth Hatebreed - I Will Be Heard “They tell you exactly what's happening, before it happens. You just keep dismissing it cos you trust lying psychopaths The depopulation agenda is literally set in stone ” Madonna, Quavo - Eurovision Song Contest 2019 Eurovision Heart Stopping Strawman - The Nature of the Cage (Official) College & Electric Youth - A Real Hero (Drive Original Movie Soundtrack) Edited July 1, 2023 by DannyUK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted July 12, 2023 Author Share Posted July 12, 2023 (edited) “What if when one of them looks like they are leaking pedo evidence, they get set up like this? “ You could be right… My money is on censorship. If TPTB state something may cause someone “harm”, they can justify censorship. So, we need situations like Phillip Scofield scandal this (above pics) and the likes of “Caroline Flack’s Law” to be used as examples of something potentially causing harms on the grounds of it being censored. Not if or not something is true or not… They're attempting to change the context and alter the grounds on which censorship works to justify censorship to be more far spread than it otherwise maybe able to get away with, as even the most asleep public would be able to see it. So, they’re using the “woke” agenda of if it’s negative, don’t say it don’t hear it and the person pointing it out are therefore bad and the person we’re referring to is the victim to our narcism, as the term is flipped on it’s head by the true narcissists to justify attacking anyone who can see what’s going on in society, how we’re being treated like cattle in a zoo and attempts to control us etc etc Take my word for it that’s why this shit is happening. Or just do your own research. You’ll see… I must say… My money was on Stephen Mulhern? But, you can’t be right about everything… Just incase anyones under any doubt, we’re being mocked… Fema - X Files Movie - Alleyway Inter-dimensional demons - Are called “aliens“ ^ I’ll update as soon as I can ^ For more on mind parasites, the moon and blocking the sun Edited July 12, 2023 by DannyUK 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 When the BBC "scandal" broke, and the rumours were going round, I'd not long watched the final ep of the current series of HIGNFY. Clive Myrie, the newscaster, was host and the entire episode seemed to be aimed at destroying his reputation, mocking it and joking about porn, onlyfans and making crude jokes (even by HIGNFY standards) about politicians and royalty. It was quite near the knuckle stuff, and I was wondering at the time what the motive behind it might have been. So, my thought was Myrie was the possible individual and HIGNFY had been an in-plain-sight psy op to subliminally put the idea out there that a respected newscaster was about to be taken down. Which, in a way, has proven true. Just not that guy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted July 13, 2023 Author Share Posted July 13, 2023 As you should be able to see here with this example… MSM are using stories such as this, to deceptively make it look as though the story is about someone it’s not. People obviously see and make the connections the media is psychologically trying to suggest/engage and then those people are accused as being “vile trolls” which is all leading towards a place where people say “something must be done” then censorship is imposed as the solution to “prevent harms” which can basically mean anything, censor anyone and deplatform anyone they like. The MSM are obviously being used to do this, which of course should be no surprise to anyone. They offer up a story already involving MSM attention seeking puppets hogging the limelight and then misrepresent the story as though it’s about someone it’s not, be coy with the details and make people guess and the likes of military intelligence using fake accounts start falsely accusing individuals, real people join in and these people are characterised as “vile shills”, “keyboard warriors”, “spreading false/misleading information” which could also “cause harm”. Enter Censorship. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted July 14, 2023 Author Share Posted July 14, 2023 (edited) Can anyone say PSYOP? Create a host of misleading “scandals” attempting to unleash “the keyboard warriors” suggest something must be done and that peoples words/opinions “can cause harms” - enter censorship. Could it be anymore blatant or is it just me? Maybe stations are jumping/cashing in on the idea of a bit of free publicity for good measure. As the idea is that many of these scandals and allegations either have no basis, exaggerated or have been attached to misleading claims so that censorship can be justified because of the impact/affect of such claims. Thats why these scandals are widespread and are happening all at once, we’re supposed to imagine the house of cards are collapsing I guess, raving this on so we can be used as the excuse to bring about such censorship, by actually sharing these “misleading claims” about with peoples various slants and opinions. Whilst later we are supposed to feel bad as though doing so we somehow contributed to “causing harm”. The presentation of a good example. They're overplaying their hand, although saying that I wouldn’t be surprised if many people still doubt this in the end and “make harmful claims of conspiracy theory” hurting our feelings suggest all those who can see this need mental help, should be attacked and shunned collectively by society, because this really is about “protecting people from harms” See through the deception yet? A nasty storm seems to be brewing around Dan Woottonfrom GBNews Why is Dan Wootton trending on Twitter? Allegations explored as presenter reportedly takes leave of absence https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/news-why-dan-wootton-trending-twitter-allegations-explored-presenter-takes-leave-absence Dan Wootton and Phillip Edited July 14, 2023 by DannyUK 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticWorld Posted July 14, 2023 Share Posted July 14, 2023 On 7/12/2023 at 10:28 PM, DannyUK said: If TPTB state something may cause someone “harm”, they can justify censorship. Same with a lot of the child trafficking stories that mainstream conservatives fall for, it's probably to push the idea of digital ID. Don't get me wrong, one trafficked human is one too many, but hysteria gets used as bait. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted July 14, 2023 Share Posted July 14, 2023 On 7/12/2023 at 10:28 PM, DannyUK said: My money is on censorship. If TPTB state something may cause someone “harm”, they can justify censorship. So, we need situations like Phillip Scofield scandal this (above pics) and the likes of “Caroline Flack’s Law” to be used as examples of something potentially causing harms on the grounds of it being censored. Not if or not something is true or not… This rings true Danny, look at the Nicola Bully saga ??? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted July 14, 2023 Author Share Posted July 14, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, alexa said: This rings true Danny, look at the Nicola Bully saga ??? Thanks for the info. Yep I can see how it’s also connected with that although I hadn’t looked into it. Nicola Bulley's family issue new statement on their torment and grief after inquest https://www.gbnews.com/news/nicola-bulley-family-statement-coroner-social-media-latest What they’re doing is making sure someone somewhere, no matter who you are, you would have heard about at least one or two of these examples. That’s why we have so many. We are not supposed to connect them all. That’s just one of those things “conspiracy theorists” do anyway about anything and everything so it doesn’t matter. This is so when they’re used as examples to justify censorship people will go, yep I heard about this or that but hadn’t actually looked into it, thought about it but are passingly aware and we can be sold the idea of censorship. Then many people may start looking or people may start to question should they have shared something or their opinion when they’re made to feel guilty. It all started to be introduced as far as I could see following the suicide of Caroline Flack, it went away for awhile and then this trend started to reemerge following all the hype surrounding This Morning and Phillip Scofield and the subsequent #MeToo type approach and attitude of all these forthcoming scandals and revelations like never before. Some of them are going to be said to be complete and utter BS I’m sure and then we start to question about how all of us have basically “shared this info and our opinions before any real investigation has taken place” to try and reshape how we share media/info so the true criminals and pedophiles and the likes can remain protected like the Jimmy Savile’s etc. As soon as we are aware of one case against them, others may start to appear stating they’ve also been abused and this is part of why this is happening to protect people and their careers “from false claims/allegations” - really those evil doers who are scared of being found out via such means so are seeking to change this - so like Savile if we find out it’s after they’re dead if we find out at all. But the bulk of why this is happening is to stop us nut job conspiracy theorists from sharing our side of events and making people think. I’m pretty sure this would have been massively studied during COVID and as much censorship that actually occurred, much must have slipped the net and so they’re using that data to reshape the levels of censorship that are in place accordingly, in the hopes that the next time we have an event equivalent to the scam of COVID, a far greater number of people will be in the dark unable to share or receive relevant information that goes against the mainstream consensus of everything. “Controlling/Creating Context” “Harmful” = Censorship A game is taking place to engineer censorship based on “harms”. See if you can see this in the following video… DAN WOOTON ROCKED WITH SHOCKING ALLEGATIONS SEX SCANDAL: Dan Wootton latest Presenter to face allegations GBNews star Dan Wootton faces fresh allegations from his former partner. https://democracyunlocked.co.uk/sex-scandal-dan-wootton-latest-presenter-to-face-allegations/ HR GIger: Necronom VII Metal Gear Archons - A.I. Technocracy - Bill Gates Brave New Virtual World The Internet - Cloud “Jesus” is the Ghost in the Machine HR GIger: Necronom I Edited July 14, 2023 by DannyUK 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted July 16, 2023 Author Share Posted July 16, 2023 Phillip Schofield Threat To Eamonn Holmes Caroline Flack's Former Fiancé was jailed for Harassing GB News presenter Dan Wootton Caroline Flack Opens Up About Her Relationship With Prince Harry | This Morning GB News Host’s Royal Stunt BACKFIRES DAN WOOTON HIT WITH SHOCKING NEW AND FAR WORSE ALLEGATIONS. I AM SICKENED. CAROL VORDERMAN SLAMS DAN WOOTON AND REVEALS THIS… Caroline Flack: Dan Wootton slams ‘despicable’ coverage of presenter’s death [News] Rising Sun - Official Theatrical Trailer (1993) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted July 16, 2023 Author Share Posted July 16, 2023 (edited) Deception - The Art of War Flack being used and abused to bring about and justify censorship. “What is a synonym for getting flack? Synonyms of flak (noun complaint, criticism) abuse. brickbat. censure. condemnation.” “What is the slang word Flack mean? a criticism Flack is a criticism. Flack also refers to anti-aircraft guns, and then sometimes it's spelled flak. Flack as a criticism comes from the military sense, as it feels like an attack. A flack (or flak) jacket will protect your body from projectiles, but it doesn't protect you from insults.” “What does gave me Flack mean? If you get a lot of flak from someone, they criticize you severely. If you take flak, you get the blame for something. [informal] The president is getting a lot of flak for that. Synonyms: criticism, stick [slang], opposition, abuse More Synonyms of flak.” The Riddler visits Two-face | Batman Forever “Robyn, an American publicist working for a cutthroat London PR company that represents troubled celebrities, is adept at keeping her clients' lives appearing in perfect order, while her own falls to pieces.” FLACK S1 | Official Trailer High School Never Ends Edited July 16, 2023 by DannyUK 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted July 17, 2023 Author Share Posted July 17, 2023 (edited) On 7/16/2023 at 4:53 AM, DannyUK said: Deception - The Art of War Flack being used and abused to bring about and justify censorship. “What is a synonym for getting flack? Synonyms of flak (noun complaint, criticism) abuse. brickbat. censure. condemnation.” “What is the slang word Flack mean? a criticism Flack is a criticism. Flack also refers to anti-aircraft guns, and then sometimes it's spelled flak. Flack as a criticism comes from the military sense, as it feels like an attack. A flack (or flak) jacket will protect your body from projectiles, but it doesn't protect you from insults.” “What does gave me Flack mean? If you get a lot of flak from someone, they criticize you severely. If you take flak, you get the blame for something. [informal] The president is getting a lot of flak for that. Synonyms: criticism, stick [slang], opposition, abuse More Synonyms of flak.” The Riddler visits Two-face | Batman Forever “Robyn, an American publicist working for a cutthroat London PR company that represents troubled celebrities, is adept at keeping her clients' lives appearing in perfect order, while her own falls to pieces.” FLACK S1 | Official Trailer High School Never Ends Dan Wootton: We must not prioritise economic migrants and people smugglers over the British people! EXPOSED! Dan Wootton ACCUSED of things HE said JOHNNY DEPP did?! Psychological Games to bring about Censorship! Just to be clear, far worse censorship than what already exists… This all forms part of the technological surveillance state. A.I. Orwell warning of 1984 Is 1984 Becoming a Reality? - George Orwell's Warning to the World Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984) - Thought Crime The Secret of V ✌ - Summoning Demons and the Dead - Devil Metallica: Master of Puppets (Official Lyric Video) David Bowie the link between Transhumanism and Transgender ⚧ Agenda - Mind Control - What are “The Cobalt Wars”? - Black Noise/Sound Bomb Club of Rome “Sustainable Development” Scam Edited July 17, 2023 by DannyUK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted July 17, 2023 Share Posted July 17, 2023 It certainly didn't escape my attention that the two big ongoing "stories" (aka psy ops) in the media relating to bad stuff happening to women, had the surnames BULLeY and FLAcK... No coincidence.... (And then there was Sarah EVERard at the same time as various other EVER linked companies and stories were in the media). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted July 18, 2023 Author Share Posted July 18, 2023 (edited) 3 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said: It certainly didn't escape my attention that the two big ongoing "stories" (aka psy ops) in the media relating to bad stuff happening to women, had the surnames BULLeY and FLAcK... No coincidence.... (And then there was Sarah EVERard at the same time as various other EVER linked companies and stories were in the media). Yep, they’re taking the absolute piss out of us. All completely about censorship, played out through their usual “all mocking tongue”. Inversion and Subversion. Gossip and Sensationalism promoted as news to censor actual news is already taking place of the most childish fashion. All so it can be said that something must be done, we must stop these allegations and claims from being newsworthy until investigation or trial. When really, this gossip and sensationalism is being used to censor actual newsworthy information and protect the most prolific offenders from being placed within the spotlight, where other victims may emerge. * Image that appears to be missing from the above post… For all those who don’t see what’s going on, they need look no further. Although, it’s advisable they do and perhaps use this as a basis… All of this of course requires a certain level of discernment and reading between the lines. It really is, the “News of the World”. Liberal Fascism Explained by Ronald Reagan For further information see here - Ronald Reagan speaks out on Socialized Medicine - Audio - Somehow, I don’t think we’re supposed to associate the medical fascism of mass “vaccination” and microchipping of infants. Of course, that will not only be free, but you will be rewarded or at the very least, incentivised. Myron Fagan recorded 1967. JFK & Myron Fagan - 'Secret Societies' Speeches Full talk is available on YT but not everyone will listen to it, but this above needs to be listened to the end to view in context here… CONTRACTS WITH DEMONS: ILLUMINATI EXPOSED PT.9 Not by the hairs of my djinny djinn djinn… Into the Void Edited July 18, 2023 by DannyUK 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.