5G IS NOT WHAT THEY ARE TELLING US

[webtrekker]

28 minutes ago, xpwales said:

I can understand 5G beam-forming being practical at short distances (street lamps, local masts etc.), but could it target an individual over long distances and through trees, buildings, mountains etc.? This is just my way of thinking but I would suggest that beam forming could be compared to holding a stick and pointing it to some target; if the stick is short and the target is nearby (less than 5m) it's easy to be accurate and the margin of error is small.

But what if the stick was 5miles long and the target was 5miles away, imagine the margin of error and the difficulty in maintaining position on a moving target, and the chances of direct line of sight would surely be very low.

 

Not to mention the Inverse Square Law.

 

 

 

[TheConsultant]

9 minutes ago, webtrekker said:

 

Not to mention the Inverse Square Law.

 

 

 

How far can a laser point? Can you get beamforming to act like a laser?

Beamforming has been around a long time, it may very well be on your home router. It isn't new.

Edited May 25 by TheConsultant

[xpwales]

4 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

How far can a laser point? Can you get beamforming to act like a laser?

Beamforming has been around a long time, it may very well be on your home router. It isn't new.

True

Edited May 25 by xpwales

[sock muppet]

4 hours ago, xpwales said:

But how are targets identified by 5G?

I would imagine that targeting is done via A.I./computers and not by human agents knowing where the target is at any point in time, so how does the A.I. use 5G to identify a target from 8 billion people?

 

Via the mass menticidal experimental injections that we just lived through, pfizers own documentation lists Graphene Oxide along with Gold as ingredients within it, at this time no-one really knows what has gone into these injections but the suggestion that there is reflective material in them suggests that anyone who has been injected would show up like smart water does under UV light when moving through the 5G network,

 

Think Sonar echo location that returns not just a signal but unique identifiers of the returned signal no matter the target.

Edited May 25 by sock muppet
xtra info

[xpwales]

10 minutes ago, sock muppet said:

 

Via the mass menticidal experimental injections that we just lived through, pfizers own documentation lists Graphene Oxide along with Gold as ingredients within it, at this time no-one really knows what has gone into these injections but the suggestion that there is reflective material in them suggests that anyone who has been injected would show up like smart water does under UV light when moving through the 5G network,

I agree, but there must be an additional method to track and target unvaxxed. Those behind the infrastructure must have taken the large portion of unvaxxed into consideration. I'm unvaxxed and experience what I would call a subtle ringing in my head... and it does not matter where I am (home, countryside, driving).

 

 

[sock muppet]

5 minutes ago, xpwales said:

I agree, but there must be an additional method to track and target unvaxxed. Those behind the infrastructure must have taken the large portion of unvaxxed into consideration. I'm unvaxxed and experience what I would call a subtle ringing in my head... and it does not matter where I am (home, countryside, driving).

 

 

 

There is, it's called facial recognition, what you have in your ears is called Tinnitus, your inner workings may have become sensitised to the frequencies in play, even if you isolate yourself from the EM field the Tinnitus may still prevail due to damage caused to the cells nerves or brain matter itself from the EM field, as far as i know there is no cure for it as of the time and date of this post, there are some techniques around that are said to alleviate the symptom,

[Deca]

8 hours ago, xpwales said:

I can understand 5G beam-forming being practical at short distances (street lamps, local masts etc.), but could it target an individual over long distances and through trees, buildings, mountains etc.? This is just my way of thinking but I would suggest that beam forming could be compared to holding a stick and pointing it to some target; if the stick is short and the target is nearby (less than 5m) it's easy to be accurate and the margin of error is small.

But what if the stick was 5miles long and the target was 5miles away, imagine the margin of error and the difficulty in maintaining position on a moving target, and the chances of direct line of sight would surely be very low.

 

I agree that satellites would have direct line of site.

 

But how are targets identified by 5G?

I would imagine that targeting is done via A.I./computers and not by human agents knowing where the target is at any point in time, so how does the A.I. use 5G to identify a target from 8 billion people?

 

Could 5G be used to provide feedback data on the results/effects of targeting an individual? If not, what would be the use/advantage of the targeting say a average citizen?

 

If 5G is just based on a specific range of frequencies (GHz/THz) using pulsed/shaped-wave modulation and focused (beam-formed) radiation, surely it's measurable using conventional (but maybe expensive) GHz/THz equipment. In which case the evidence collected by targets/engineers around the world would be overwhelming with thousands of published reports and law suits. Additionally, would Gov./Financial funders risk such an overt deployment, imagine the cost of deploying billions of 5G street lamps, masts etc., only to be measured and exposed for it's harm by the public using conventional equipment.

 

 

 

TI`s are not targeted by 5G as they were targeted before 5G in fact in the days of 1G/tetra etc ....and basically TI`s (microwave hearing effect is done) via modified RADAR 

also there ways to track people using mobile mast/signals as a passive RADAR system 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/oct/13/humanrights.mobilephones

 

 

 

 

 

claims it up to 250km away ....plus it looks very similar to what's on a  tetra mast ....

[Deca]

 

[xpwales]

I stand corrected, it appears that long range TI tracking is possible.

[Deca]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinnitus