Macnamara Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 UNCONSTITUTIONAL: In 2021, the FBI conducted more than 278,000 warrantless searches on U.S. citizens The FISA court has released shocking new information showing that at the height of the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “pandemic,” the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) conducted more than 278,000 warrantless searches on United States citizens in direct violation of the Constitution. In 2021, the FBI carried out as many as 762 warrantless searches per day, the unsealed FISA documents released in a recent court hearing show. This amounts to 32 illegal searches by the FBI per hour, or one new warrantless search every two minutes for an entire year. Keep in mind that the 278,000-plus illegal searches the FBI conducted in 2021 without a warrant are separate from the proper searches with warrants that the agency normally conducts as a regular bureau function. “It also does not include the 3,400,000 times the FBI searched citizens’ data without warrants,” revealed Townhall‘s Kevin McCullough. “That’s 9,315 per day, 388 per hour, and 6.5 per minute.” “So in 2021 – every two minutes – the FBI conducted a physical search and 13 data searches – illegally – for the entire year.” The FBI is riddled with corruption – it’s time to clean house Since 2021 was the first year of Joe Biden’s fake “presidency,” it makes a lot of sense that the FBI’s warrantless search activity soared to new heights. It seems obvious that the agency colluded with the Biden regime to go after its political enemies. That same year, it became pretty much undeniable that the FBI has been weaponized by the Left to go after the Right, to put it in simple terms. And all of this happened under the direct watch of Christopher Wray, though the FBI had been veering into a corrupt culture for many years before Biden as well. “It turns out it was illegal, and our government’s continual weaponizing against us rolls on,” McCullough explained. “Now that the American equivalent of a nationwide S.S. or KGB sting has been exposed, every lawmaker’s phone on capitol hill needs to be lit up this next week.” This is the very same FBI, by the way, that prior to Biden had been tipped off about two-time failed presidential wannabe Hillary Clinton’s “Russia Collusion” conspiracy theory, which she lobbed at Donald Trump in retaliation for his 2016 presidential victory. It is also the same FBI that shamelessly lied to the FISA court to extend its search warrants to surveil people who, in many cases, were later vindicated and cleared of any wrongdoing. All during the Trump years, the FBI worked in tandem with Democrats to try to unseat him, even though he won the 2016 election fair and square. And who could forget the fact that the FBI was instrumental in burying the Hunter Biden laptop story. Said laptop is still in the FBI’s possession, but the corrupt agency refuses to do anything about it. Before Trump was installed in early 2017, the FBI knew full well that the Democrat Party was working hand over foot to remove him. Instead of stopping this, the FBI contributed to it by holding a special briefing with then-President Barack Hussein Obama and then-Vice President Joe Biden about the coup attempt. Then there was the corruption in the Durham report, as well as the other four million illegal, warrantless searches the FBI conducted in other years besides just 2021. When Trump famously told the American people that “they are coming for me because I am fighting for you,” we now know precisely what he was talking about, do we not? http://www.stationgossip.com/2023/05/unconstitutional-in-2021-fbi-conducted.html 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 On 5/17/2023 at 8:30 PM, Macnamara said: It was all just a big nothing burger...now people should realise that the dems stole the last election DAVID MARCUS: The FBI's anti-Trump Keystone Cops… the CIA's 51 laptop-trashing stooges… the NYT's biased Pulitzer lapdogs: now we KNOW they're all in the Dems' pockets and - terrifyingly – it's derailing democracy By David Marcus For Dailymail.Com Published: 19:35 BST, 16 May 2023 | Updated: 21:01 BST, 16 May 2023 The deranged partisan hacks running America's once-respected institutions are completely, utterly, maybe irredeemably, shameless. What other verdict can one reach after reading Special Counsel John Durham's report on the FBI investigation of President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign? It should never – never in a thousand years – have been launched. And the news media – the supposed independent servants of democracy, who demand that every Republican swear on their children that the 2020 vote was free, fair, and won by Biden – were more than happy to go along with it. But now we know, the real election meddling was state sponsored. The FBI 'failed to uphold their mission of strict fidelity to the law,' wrote Durham. He found that the agency kicked off a full-fledged probe, at the height of an election, into a presidential campaign based on 'raw,' 'unevaluated,' and ultimately, dud information. They ignored exculpatory evidence and were blinded by preconceived notions. At best, they're the Keystone Cops. At worst, they're direct descendants of J. Edgar Hoover. It's damning. America was told Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulous had secret connections to the Kremlin. He didn't. The public was fed the ridiculous Steele dossier, a document about as authentic as a Rolex purchased from a briefcase, as if it was the Ten Commandments. It wasn't. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12090847/DAVID-MARCUS-FBI-Keystone-Cops-CIA-stooges-Pulitzer-lapdogs-Theyre-Dems-pockets.html Durham report is utterly damning, so where are all the indictments? by Issues Insights Editorial Board The long-delayed, much-awaited Durham report has finally dropped. And what it shows is nothing short of shocking: A conspiracy at the highest levels of our government to fix an election in favor of one candidate over another. This is not something that deserves merely a handslap or the usual Inside-The-Beltway tut-tutting. It’s a criminal act for which people should go to prison. Just for the record, this is far worse than Watergate. And that ended Richard Nixon’s presidency, even though he neither planned nor approved of the break-ins against the Democratic Party offices in the famed Watergate Hotel. What will the perpetrators of this crime get? The FBI launched its now-infamous “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation of alleged Russian “influence” on the Trump campaign in July 2016. The premise for the investigation was a “dossier” of information from former British spy Christopher Steele that implicated Donald Trump and several of his supporters as being improperly influenced by Russia’s government. The only problem: The dossier was found to be false, “misinformation” of the worst kind, but nonetheless reported as the “truth” by nearly all mainstream media outlets. Worse still, in July 2016, as the FBI got underway with its investigation, it received a Russian intelligence analysis alleging that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was plotting to distract attention from her own very real law-breaking, “her use of a private email server,” a serious. even dangerous, breach of security and a clear violation of the law. The so-called “Clinton Plan” was hatched by the Hillary campaign “to stir up a scandal” against Trump “by tying him to Putin and the Russians’ hacking of the Democratic National Committee,” the Durham report said. In August 2016, CIA chief John Brennan even briefed President Barack Obama, then-Vice President Joe Biden, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey about what the Clinton campaign was doing, according to the Durham report. But the FBI did nothing to stop a clearly illegal act from taking place. As Special Counsel John Durham himself put it, the FBI “failed to uphold their mission of strict fidelity to the law.” What’s worse, it should have been clear to those inside the FBI’s own investigation that they were being used by Hillary’s campaign to defeat Trump. But the FBI went forward with its investigation anyway. “Unlike the FBI’s opening of a full investigation of unknown members of the Trump campaign based on raw, uncorroborated information, in this separate matter involving a purported Clinton campaign plan, the FBI never opened any type of inquiry, issued any taskings, employed any analytical personnel, or produced any analytical products in connection with the information,” the report said. Durham noted that this marked a “noticeable departure” from FBI practice and that officials began the investigation without “any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement.” The only plausible answer for this “noticeable departure” is that it was indeed just that — a conscious move on the part of the FBI to intervene in a presidential election on behalf of a political ally. We wonder: How many voters might have gone to the polls and voted for Trump if the media, FBI, and Clinton campaign and its allies weren’t all loudly proclaiming that Trump was a bought-and-paid-for asset of Vladimir Putin? He was, we were assured, a traitor with sick sexual predilections, the latter a story entirely made up allegedly by Hillary pal and public relations executive Charles Dolan. This was the real conspiracy among dozens of people and multiple organizations, ranging from the CIA and FBI to the White House and the Hillary Clinton campaign. That is a real threat to what Democrats like to grandly refer to as “our democracy.” Or, as USA Today editorial board member and author James Bovard put it in the New York Post, Durham’s final report showed “how the FBI and Justice Department plotted to rig the 2016 presidential election.” Meanwhile, the Durham report said “the FBI appears to have made no effort to investigate … the Clinton campaign’s purported acceptance” of an illegal campaign contribution “that was made by the FBI’s own long-term [confidential human source] on behalf of Insider-I and, ultimately” a foreign government. In short, the very thing the accusers were charging Trump with doing. But still, no indictments. A seemingly exasperated Roger Kimball wondered if the responsible parties would be held accountable. For those who believe they will, he offered for sale “a nice bridge in Brooklyn.” He’s right, of course. So is American Thinker editor Thomas Lifson, who added that “by issuing no indictments whatsoever, (Durham) enabled the complex story to be buried by the same media in a day or two.” The ongoing misconduct is overwhelming and pervasive, and clearly indicates a deep state political bias on behalf of the increasingly far-left Democratic Party among FBI, CIA and Justice Department officials. The leadership of the FBI, frankly, was corrupt in 2016 and remains so today. As for Clinton, she hatched the plan and funded it illegally out of Democratic National Committee coffers. For that blatant misuse of funds, she got a measly $113,000 fine from the Federal Election Commission. While the FBI says it has “changed,” it is even now slow-walking the investigation into the Biden family’s corruption, though there appear to be documented payments to at least nine members of the family from foreign sources. And don’t forget son Hunter’s incriminating laptop, which the FBI pretended was a Russian hoax until it was proved otherwise. And what about the 51 former “intelligence” officials who signed a letter attesting to the veracity of the Russia hoax? Should they be allowed to continue to cash in on their government positions even though they supported an out-and-out lie and interfered in a U.S. election for purely partisan reasons? The Durham report, after nearly four years, while welcome, falls short. America needs a thorough housecleaning at the highest levels. We had hoped strong indictments of those who committed these political crimes would send a powerful message. Now, we’ll have to wait until 2024 for that. https://thedailybs.com/2023/05/22/durham-report-is-utterly-damning-so-where-are-all-the-indictments/ 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 FBI AGAIN refuses to share document Republicans say proves Biden was involved in criminal bribery scheme with a foreign national - 24 hours after McCarthy said they would hand it over FBI officials met with House Oversight Committee staff Monday after missing a May 10 deadline to provide a document allegedly linking Biden to a cash for access scheme A committee aide told DailyMail.com that Chairman James Comer is expected to announce next steps 'soon' READ MORE: Biden's GRANDCHILDREN are among the 10 family members who got foreign cash through 'influence-peddling' scheme By Kelly Laco, Executive Editor Of Politics For Dailymail.Com Published: 21:45 BST, 22 May 2023 | Updated: 12:23 BST, 23 May 2023 The FBI has again refused to hand over an internal document that Republicans claim shows President Joe Biden was involved in a 'criminal' scheme with a foreign national. The House Oversight Committee, which is leading the investigation into 'influence-peddling' by the first family, met with bureau officials on Monday who who refused to hand over the file. The internal FD-1023 form apparently details an 'arrangement' for an exchange of money for policy decisions, the Republicans said. The bureau's latest stonewalling came as a second IRS whistleblower came forward, claiming he was sidelined from the Hunter Biden probe when he claimed the president's son was getting preferential treatment. The FBI missed a noon deadline on Wednesday, May 10 to provide the document, angering Republicans who said FBI Director Chris Wray may face 'consequences.' As a result, a committee aide told DailyMail.com that Comer is expected to announce next steps 'soon.' The meeting Monday comes after House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said the FBI is poised to hand over the potentially damning document after he spoke with FBI Director Chris Wray. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12112657/FBI-refuses-hand-document-Republicans-say-proves-Biden-involved-bribery-scheme.html 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 25 Share Posted May 25 Chemtrails are not a theory, they are a conspiracy fact By Rhoda Wilson on May 24, 2023 In 2014 a whistle-blower described how she discovered the US Air Force was involved in chemtrail operations. “Geoengineering is occurring, it’s been occurring, and it’s not new. And your tax dollars are funding this … I 100% know that the US Air Force was involved,” she said. Fast forward to 2022 and Bill Gates openly admits to funding SCoPEx’s chemtrail experiments to “create a global cooling effect.” Gates is a prop in a global disinformation campaign, GeoEngineering Watch says. The experiments themselves are nothing more than an orchestrated distraction from the ongoing global climate engineering operations that have been deployed for approximately 74 years – over a decade longer than Bill Gates has even been alive. Read the following and, if you haven’t already done so, you’ll realise that chemtrails are a conspiracy that disinformation campaigns have been trying to cover up for decades. Kristen Meghan, former US Air Force (“USAF”) industrial hygienist and environmental specialist, gave a presentation of what she had discovered about chemtrails at the first Annual Save Long Island Forum held on 17-19 January 2014 in Hauppauge, NY. Meghan spoke from the heart of her personal experience involving her career while serving at the Warner Robbins Airforce Base and when she came across huge shipments of toxic chemicals (aluminium, barium, strontium), oxides and sulphates being used in the sky and exposing organic lifeforms to these carcinogens. While working for the air force, “in an attempt to debunk the [chemtrail] ‘conspiracy theory’, as I thought it was – I didn’t debunk it, it literally changed my life,” Meghan said. One of her duties was to approve materials for use by USAF. One day she was going through the computer system used by the USAF to approve the use of hazardous materials and she found extraordinarily large quantities of aluminium, barium and strontium in the forms of oxides and sulphates. She asked: What are these being used for? She didn’t get an answer so she refused to approve them. She was asked why she wasn’t approving the chemicals for use and pressured into doing so. But she stood her ground and instead asked further questions. “At that point … [the] demonisation [of me] began,” she said. She was moved to Warner Robbins Airforce Base and she found the same large quantities of the same chemicals. She began to investigate. She conducted tests on air and soil samples and found high levels of these chemicals in the samples. When she started asking questions again, she was threatened with being placed under psychological evaluation. “As I heard that, I knew. It validated everything I ever thought,” Meghan said. “People say: ‘If this is true, we are spraying the people, where are pilots [speaking out]? “I don’t know if you pay attention but look at [Edward] Snowden. Look at [Chelsea] Manning. People don’t come forward because these supposed whistle-blower act protections that you have are not enforced, they’re not supported and they really don’t exist. “Geoengineering is occurring, it’s been occurring, and it’s not new. And your tax dollars are funding this … I 100% know that the US Air Force was involved.” If the video above is removed from YouTube you can watch it on Rumble HERE or Odysee HERE. To watch presentations from other speakers at the 2014 Annual Save Long Island Forum, follow this LINK. See more from Kristen Meghan on her website HERE. It’s important to recognise that climate and weather are not the same. Weather is local while climate is global. Geoengineering aims to change the climate globally whereas weather modification activity aims to change the weather locally. Geoengineering involves solar radiation management through the injection of aerosols into the stratosphere, and carbon capture and storage. The dominant form of weather modification is cloud seeding but other approaches to influencing the weather include the use of ultrashort lasers, satellite systems, electrical charges and sound waves. To block out the sun, Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering (“SAG”) and Solar Radiation Management (“SRM”) are solar geoengineering programs designed to saturate the stratosphere with reflective aerosols through the use of modified jet aircraft. These are examples of what are often referred to as chemical trails or “chemtrails.” For those who think chemtrails are fiction, there are a plethora of “official” sources that can easily be found on the internet that say otherwise. For example, a 2022 article published by Forbes stated that Bill Gates was a proponent of solar geoengineering and had backed a Harvard University experiment called SCoPEx to look at the effect of spraying particles into the stratosphere to “create a global cooling effect.” In response, many have called for solar geoengineering to be stopped and have begun a petition which has so far garnered more than 2,400 signatures. According to GeoEngineering Watch, Gates is nothing more than a prop in the elaborate power structure disinformation campaign on the climate engineering issue. Though Gates may be contributing to SCoPEx, the experiment itself is nothing more than an orchestrated distraction from the ongoing global climate engineering operations that have been deployed for approximately 74 years – over a decade longer than Bill Gates has even been alive. By October 2014, GeoEngineering Watch stated, SAG and SRM programs were cited in approximately 150 patents and documents; openly discussed in US Congressional hearings on weather modification; and, outlined by numerous scientific agencies including The Royal Society, United Nations, and Royal Meteorological Society. Below we give two further examples of “official” sources which demonstrate chemtrails as fact, not fiction. We don’t have an easy way of determining whether or not these particular examples are included in the sources referred to by GeoEngineering Watch. In the video above Meghan talks about David Keith, a Harvard professor and head of SCoPEx. Keith published the 2013 book ‘A Case for Climate Engineering’. In it, he argued that climate engineering should be considered to “slow the pace of global warming by injecting reflective particles into the upper atmosphere.” Even though, as GeoEngineering Watch identifies, Keith is a primary actor in the “Carnegie Science” geoengineering deception effort, Keith has “done more for the truth movement of [geoengineering] than anything,” Meghan said. In another example of geoengineering being admitted in official sources, five years before Meghan gave her presentation, chemtrails were openly discussed during a hearing in the US House Science and Technology Committee. In November 2009, Representative Adrian Smith expressed a wide range of concerns about the concept of geoengineering – the deliberate large-scale modification of the Earth’s climate. Rep. Smith expressed his concerns regarding the impact of these theories on livestock agriculture. On the panel of “experts” was Dr. Ken Caldeira, another primary actor in the “Carnegie Science” geoengineering deception effort. Caldeira said: “We don’t know how well these methods will work, these solar radiation methods will work, at affecting regional climates.” https://expose-news.com/2023/05/24/chemtrails-are-not-a-theory-they-are-a-conspiracy-fact/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 26 Share Posted May 26 The FBI Knows What Car Was Used In J6 DNC Pipe Bomb, But Refuses To Identify Prime Suspect By: Tristan Justice May 25, 2023 The FBI is continuing to stonewall congressional oversight of the agency’s investigation into a pair of pipe bombs found at the Democrat National Committee and Republican National Committee headquarters on Jan. 6, 2021. On Wednesday, House Republicans on the Judiciary Committee re-upped demands for a comprehensive briefing on the two-year-old case over which the FBI has refused transparency. “Your failure to comply with our request is particularly concerning given recent media reports regarding the pipe bomb investigation,” lawmakers wrote. Earlier this month, an FBI whistleblower told the Washington Times the FBI identified the vehicle the suspect entered shortly after planting the bombs but has not pursued the individual. “The FBI had surveillance video that showed the person entering a car with a visible license plate after exiting a Metro stop in Northern Virginia,” the Times reported. Kyle Seraphin, a former FBI agent who worked on the case, told the paper that the agency “tied whoever the person was that dropped the bombs with [surveillance] cameras all the way through the train and getting into a car with that license plate.” Seraphin also told the Washington Times that the two bombs were inoperable. “One former FBI assistant director observed, ‘[i]t just doesn’t add up … there’s just too much to work with to not know who this guy is,'” the Judiciary Republicans wrote. Now lawmakers are seeking answers over the status of the investigation. Julie Kelly, a senior writer at American Greatness, wrote in February last year that the pipe bomb incident possesses the markings of “another FBI hoax.” “As the FBI successfully rounded up hundreds of Capitol trespassers using sophisticated tools such as geofence warrants, the trail of the pipe bomber went cold,” Kelly reported, despite federal law enforcement having posted a $50,000 reward, which they later increased to half a million dollars. “Given what we know about the FBI’s politically motivated malfeasance during the Trump era, the likelihood the pipe bomb story was another FBI hoax instead of a legitimate threat becomes more conceivable each day.” A cascade of FBI scandals in just the 15 months since Kelly’s reporting reveals a breathtaking degree of political bias within the top law enforcement agency. From the unprecedented raid of former President Donald Trump’s home to investigations of traditional Catholics to numerous whistleblower reports detailing double standards of justice, the FBI’s reputation has only continued to deteriorate. https://thefederalist.com/2023/05/25/the-fbi-knows-what-car-was-used-in-j6-dnc-pipe-bomb-but-refuses-to-identify-prime-suspect/?utm_source=substack 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 29 Share Posted May 29 The science of us... Mass-Observation Mass-Observation is a United Kingdom social research project; originally the name of an organisation which ran from 1937 to the mid-1960s, and was revived in 1981 at the University of Sussex. Mass-Observation originally aimed to record everyday life in Britain through a panel of around 500 untrained volunteer observers who either maintained diaries or replied to open-ended questionnaires (known as directives). The organisation also paid investigators to anonymously record people's conversation and behaviour at work, on the street and at various public occasions, including public meetings and sporting and religious events. During the Second World War, Mass-Observation research was occasionally influential in shaping British public policy. In 1939 Mass-Observation publicly criticised the Ministry of Information's posters, which led to their being replaced with more appropriate ones. In addition, their study of saving habits was successfully used by John Maynard Keynes to argue for tax policy changes. During the war, there were also a few cases of Mass Observation (MO) doing research on commission for government authorities trying to shape recruiting and war propaganda: Mary Adams, for example, employed MO on commission for the Ministry of Information. Mass-Observation has been criticised by some as an invasion of privacy. Participants were not only reporting on their own lives; they often commented on their neighbours and friends as well. Such an atmosphere of surveillance was in keeping with the rising culture of espionage, which dominated the Second World War, although Mass-Observation was an independent, not a government, effort aimed at education rather than manipulation of the public. Mass-Observation had set out to turn the tools of anthropology used to study foreign cultures to study Britain's: to be "The Science of Us." Criticism of the scientific validity focusing on the experimental parameters began fairly early, continued throughout its existence, and was a key element in its eventual demise. Because of the self-selecting nature of the observers, they did not represent a scientifically balanced cross-section of British society as a modern public opinion poll would. Although geographically and occupationally diverse, the participants tended to be middle-class, educated, literate, and left of centre. Decline and end Following the war, and the departure of project founders Harrisson, Madge, and Jennings, research began to focus on the commercial habits of the country[7] rather than the broader cultural research that characterised its first decade. This turn towards market research was formalised in 1949 when the project was incorporated as a private firm and, under new management, became registered as a market research limited company, Mass Observation (UK) Limited. Eventually the firm was merged with the advertising agency J. Walter Thompson's UK research agency BMRB, to form MRB International, followed by a full merger in the early 1990s.[citation needed] Relaunch: The Mass Observation Project (1981 - present) A re-evaluation of the Mass-Observation archives led to a relaunch of the project in 1981.[8] Today, housed at the University of Sussex, Mass-Observation continues to collect the thoughts of its panel of writers through regular questionnaires (known as directives) and is used by students, academics, media researchers and the public for its unique collection of material on everyday life in Britain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass-Observation 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 30 Share Posted May 30 The Cloward-Piven Strategy https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/the-cloward-piven-strategy/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 30 Share Posted May 30 The depop agenda: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Covid Pandemic: A “Truth Bomb” Explodes to Illuminate the War on Humanity By Prof. Anthony J. Hall Global Research, May 28, 2023 “Billionaires Try to Shrink World’s Population” According to the Wall Street Journal: “Billionaires Try to Shrink World’s Population”. In May 2009, the Billionaire philanthropists met behind closed doors at the home of the president of The Rockefeller University in Manhattan. This Secret Gathering was sponsored by Bill Gates. They called themselves “The Good Club”. The emphasis was not on population growth (i.e Planned Parenthood) but on “Depopulation”, i.e,. the reduction in the absolute size of the World’s population. The scheme for population reduction is introducing a kind of deregulated free-for-all when it comes to further unrestricted medical experiments on human subjects. These subjects of medical experiments will be in no position to give or withhold informed consent. According to Bill Gates in his TED presentation (February 2010) pertaining to vaccination: “And if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [the world population] by 10 or 15 percent”. According to Gates’ statement, this would represent an absolute reduction of the World’s population (2010) of the order 680 million to 1.02 billion. (See quotation on Video starting at 04.21. See also screenshot of Transcript of quotation) TED Talk at 04:21: Depopulation and the mRNA Vaccine Transhumans A major aim of those planning and implementing these experiments is the creation of transhumans. These transhuman beings will see their inherited biology combined with the engineering of digital and genetic modifications. The alterations to the human genome are to be supported by the insertion within transhumans of many forms of nanotechnology. Most of the altered mergers of natural and unnatural life will be placed under the governing control of Artificial Intelligence projects now rapidly coming online. The WEF’s Klaus Schwab (2 min at outset of the video below ) confirmed that humans will become “transhumans” in a 2016 interview with the French Swiss TV (RTS): RTS: “When will that happen? KS: “Certainly in the next ten years. “We could imagine that we will implant theme [microchips] in our brain or in our skin”. “And then we can imagine that there is direct communication between the [human] brain and the digital World”. “What we see is a kind of fusion of the physical, digital and biological World “And first you have the personalized robots…” Video: Towards Digital Tyranny with Peter Koenig The strategic contest to determine the future overlords, designs, and uses of Artificial Intelligence forms a big aspect of the acrimony and negotiation currently taking place in the most covert venues of US-China relations. It is telling that most citizens are left well outside the loop of the decisions being made about how AI will be deployed to regulate our own lives. Much secrecy prevails in this strategic AI realm, a realm of huge consequence in establishing future patterns in the lives and deaths of human beings. The precedent is already deeply embedded that we the people are to be kept outside the circle of informed consent when it comes to the subject of how new technologies are to be deployed in creating the conditions of human existence. Those decisions are currently being mostly monopolized by the closed club of multi-billionaires and their agents in the security agencies and media. In 2022 the objectives of the escalating war on nature is putting special emphasis on the alteration of human nature and the civilizational inheritance that we were born into. The startling scale of the assault on both nature and on the political economy of our current civilization is quickly becoming increasingly apparent to more and more people. https://www.globalresearch.ca/nuclear-truth-bomb-explodes-illuminate-war-humanity/5766485 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 30 Share Posted May 30 The SMART grid technocratic gulag: Big Tech Communism has Arrived: Amazon Sidewalk Joins the Helium Network to Connect All Internet of Things (IoT) Devices May 29, 2023 by Brian Shilhavy Editor, Health Impact News Big Tech Communism has arrived in the United States, as the U.S. has now surpassed China and other communist countries to become the world leader in spying on its citizens. It was announced this past week that Amazon Sidewalk has now joined the Helium Network allowing all Internet of Things (IoT) devices, which are currently in the homes of almost all Americans, to be connected into one large mesh network nationwide. The World Economic Forum’s (WEF) goals for the 4th Industrial Revolution and Great Reset where nobody will own anything and be confined into 15-minute “smart cities,” is clearly a modern day Big Tech version of communism, where the rights of the individual are sacrificed for the rights of the community. This new system of surveillance, which is creating the ultimate police state, is well underway in the United States, which has, by far, the largest proportion of its population connected to the Internet, including cell phones, vehicles, cameras, and household appliances, than any other country in the world. Amazon Sidewalk Source. Here is the description of the new Amazon Sidewalk mesh network that was just introduced this year, from the source, Amazon.com. Everything you need to know about Amazon Sidewalk, the secure, low-cost network that can connect devices up to half a mile away Imagine a network that securely connects your devices to the internet for free—from nearly anywhere. It exists. It’s called Amazon Sidewalk. And it has a range farther than Wi-Fi and is less expensive than the cost of a typical cellular network. This network opens the door to the creation of new types of devices for homes, businesses, and cities, which will help people intelligently track shipments, find lost pets, remotely detect smoke from wildfires, and so much more. Amazon Sidewalk is a secure, free-to-connect community network designed to provide reliable connectivity for billions of devices. It’s already accessible to more than 90% of the U.S. population. (Source.) Independent investigator Neil ‘Liberty’ Radimaker, writing for The Conscious Resistance Network, published an article this past week discussing the dangers this new network by Amazon presents. Unveiling the Privacy Perils of Amazon Sidewalk In a time where technology continues to shape our lives, the emergence of Amazon Sidewalk has ignited a fervent debate about the balance between convenience and privacy. As an independent investigator, I feel compelled to understand the deep complexities and potential dangers of this pervasive network. This investigative report aims to shed light on the surveillance capabilities, coverage area, and the undisclosed collaborations surrounding Amazon Sidewalk. In this report, we dive into the alarming dangers posed by these surveillance capabilities and the implications for personal privacy and autonomy. Audio and Video Intrusion: One of the most concerning aspects of Amazon Sidewalk is its ability to intrude into our private spaces without our explicit consent or knowledge. By silently capturing seamless audio and video data through devices like Ring cameras, Amazon Echo and other compatible smart home technologies. Sidewalk has the potential to turn every room of our homes into a watchful eye, constantly recording and analyzing our activities. This level of surveillance undermines the sanctity of our personal lives and raises questions about the boundaries of consent and individual autonomy. Integration with Facial Recognition: One of the most controversial aspects of Amazon Sidewalk’s privacy invasion potential is its integration with facial recognition technology. By combining video surveillance with facial recognition algorithms, Sidewalk will have the capacity to identify individuals and track their movements with alarming accuracy. Individuals can be identified and monitored, alerting officials when a person designated as “suspicious” is caught on camera. Behavior Profiling: By collecting a vast amount of data about our daily routines, habits, and preferences, Amazon Sidewalk has the potential to construct detailed profiles of individuals. Through sophisticated algorithms and data analysis, Sidewalk can track our movements, monitor our online activities, and even make inferences about our behaviors and interests. This level of profiling creates a comprehensive digital portrait, encroaching upon our autonomy and raising concerns about potential manipulation or discrimination. Room Mapping and Blueprinting: Amazon’s acquisition of iRobot, the maker of Roomba raises concerns about data sharing and collaboration with Amazon Sidewalk. The Roomba’s advanced features, including its mapping and blueprinting capabilities, introduce interesting privacy implications. With data collection and the ability to gather detailed information about our home layouts and furnishings. The Roomba can also silently record audio and video, analyzing our activities, intruding into our most private spaces. Overlap of Coverage Reach: Amazon Sidewalk’s extensive network coverage raises concerns about the widespread surveillance it enables. With a vast number of interconnected devices, this creates an overlapping network of surveillance that spans entire neighborhoods and public spaces. This level of coverage infringes upon our very sense of privacy, as our movements and activities can be captured and monitored from various angles and locations privately and publicly. Amazon Sidewalk’s ambition is to establish a nationwide network, the company currently claims it now provides coverage to over 90% of the U.S. population, including those who live in moderately rural areas. Unregulated Data Collection: The vast amount of data collected by Amazon Sidewalk raises significant concerns about its storage, usage, and potential for misuse. With access to intimate details of our lives, including our daily routines, social interactions, and even sensitive information, the potential for abuse or unauthorized access to this data is alarming. The lack of clear regulations and safeguards heightens the risks associated with such uncontrolled data collection. Read the full report. This report by Radimaker does not even discuss the health hazards from frequency radiation by all these devices. https://vaccineimpact.com/2023/big-tech-communism-has-arrived-amazon-sidewalk-joins-the-helium-network-to-connect-all-internet-of-things-iot-devices/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 Digital ID's €46M earmarked for four EU digital identity wallet pilots May 25, 2023, 3:38 pm EDT | William McCurdy The European Commission is set to invest €46 million (roughly $49 million) into the European digital identity (EUDI) wallet, in the form of four pan-European pilot programs. The EUDI wallet is an upcoming mobile phone app that promises citizens of the EU’s 27 constitutional countries a way to store and share digital identity data. Potential use cases of the technology include helping to provide digital travel credentials, expediting the process of opening a bank account, registering for a SIM card, proving educational and professional qualifications, or claiming social benefits such as healthcare. The 4 pilot projects are set to involve more than 250 private and public organizations “across almost every Member State”, as well as Norway, Iceland, and Ukraine, and they will run for at least 2 years. The projects will work on 11 priority use cases, which will look to improve citizens’ access to trusted and secure digital identity according to the release. The projects represent a combined investment of over €90 million in the EU digital identity ecosystem, 50% co-financed by the Commission. The four projects will help Member States and other stakeholders prepare for the European Digital Identity Regulation legislation coming into force, which is currently under negotiation in the European parliament, according to the documents. In addition, the projects are targeted at helping the EU’s goal, set out in the Digital Decade Policy Programme target for everybody living in the EU to have access to a secure and user-friendly eID by 2030. As per the announcement, all the projects collaborate closely with the Commission and each other. Their results are then set to feed into “the ongoing development of technical specifications for the EUDI wallet by the eIDAS expert group.” Some security concerns have impacted the project so far, with many experts positing that having so much highly valuable personal data in one system could provide a ‘honeypot – a tantalizing target – for prospective cybercriminals. In a Brussels seminar on the security of eID wallet scheme, hosted by GlobalPlatform, some of the participants voiced their concerns. For example, Jean-Karim Zinzindohoué, CTO of France Identité said: “It remains a challenge to provide the highest level of security given the deep fakes that you could inject into the system.” https://www.biometricupdate.com/202305/e46m-earmarked-for-four-eu-digital-identity-wallet-pilots Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 On 5/26/2023 at 6:36 PM, Macnamara said: The FBI Knows What Car Was Used In J6 DNC Pipe Bomb, But Refuses To Identify Prime Suspect By: Tristan Justice May 25, 2023 The FBI is continuing to stonewall congressional oversight of the agency’s investigation into a pair of pipe bombs found at the Democrat National Committee and Republican National Committee headquarters on Jan. 6, 2021. On Wednesday, House Republicans on the Judiciary Committee re-upped demands for a comprehensive briefing on the two-year-old case over which the FBI has refused transparency. “Your failure to comply with our request is particularly concerning given recent media reports regarding the pipe bomb investigation,” lawmakers wrote. Earlier this month, an FBI whistleblower told the Washington Times the FBI identified the vehicle the suspect entered shortly after planting the bombs but has not pursued the individual. “The FBI had surveillance video that showed the person entering a car with a visible license plate after exiting a Metro stop in Northern Virginia,” the Times reported. Kyle Seraphin, a former FBI agent who worked on the case, told the paper that the agency “tied whoever the person was that dropped the bombs with [surveillance] cameras all the way through the train and getting into a car with that license plate.” Seraphin also told the Washington Times that the two bombs were inoperable. “One former FBI assistant director observed, ‘[i]t just doesn’t add up … there’s just too much to work with to not know who this guy is,'” the Judiciary Republicans wrote. Now lawmakers are seeking answers over the status of the investigation. Julie Kelly, a senior writer at American Greatness, wrote in February last year that the pipe bomb incident possesses the markings of “another FBI hoax.” “As the FBI successfully rounded up hundreds of Capitol trespassers using sophisticated tools such as geofence warrants, the trail of the pipe bomber went cold,” Kelly reported, despite federal law enforcement having posted a $50,000 reward, which they later increased to half a million dollars. “Given what we know about the FBI’s politically motivated malfeasance during the Trump era, the likelihood the pipe bomb story was another FBI hoax instead of a legitimate threat becomes more conceivable each day.” A cascade of FBI scandals in just the 15 months since Kelly’s reporting reveals a breathtaking degree of political bias within the top law enforcement agency. From the unprecedented raid of former President Donald Trump’s home to investigations of traditional Catholics to numerous whistleblower reports detailing double standards of justice, the FBI’s reputation has only continued to deteriorate. https://thefederalist.com/2023/05/25/the-fbi-knows-what-car-was-used-in-j6-dnc-pipe-bomb-but-refuses-to-identify-prime-suspect/?utm_source=substack the FBI are hiding so many secrets from the american people: New: FBI Refuses to Turn Over Subpoenaed Biden Bribe Document; Comer Says He Will ‘Take Steps” to Seek Contempt of Congress Vote Chairman of the House Oversight Committee Rep. James Comer (R-KY) issued a statement Tuesday afternoon reporting that the FBI informed the committee it will not comply with a May 30 deadline to turn over a subpoenaed FBI document, FD 2013, that a whistleblower says contains allegations that then Vice President Joe Biden took a $5 million bribe from a foreign national to make favorable policy decisions. Comer said in response he will be “taking steps” to hold FBI Director Christopher Wray in contempt of Congress. http://www.stationgossip.com/2023/05/new-fbi-refuses-to-turn-over-subpoenaed.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 (edited) The Talpiot Programme The talpiot programme is a theory that the israelis have under cover nationalists, with dual passports, operating in other countries such as the US and UK where they work to assist Israeli interests for example by passing information and technology from areas like big tech (eg silicon valley) and defense to israel. These helpers are termed 'sayanim' or 'hasbara' (there is a difference between these terms: see explanations below) Sayanim (Hebrew: סייענים) are Jews who live outside of Israel and often hold citizenships of countries they reside in, but who volunteer or are recruited clandestinely by Mossad to assist with their operations. The word Sayanim is Hebrew for "assisters" or "collaborators". The term Sayanim itself is plural, with a single one being a Sayan (Hebrew: סייענ). Former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky, wrote extensively about activities of the Sayanim, as has Gordon Thomas. "According Ostrovsky and Gordon Thomas, the sayanim provide assistance of various kinds to Mossad officers operating in foreign countries. This assistance can include facilitating medical care, money, logistics, and even overt intelligence gathering. They can be judges, court clerks, expert witnesses, child protective service workers, Assistant District Attorneys, police officers, or anyone with a great degree of power over people's lives, and will do anything at the behest of Mossad case officers (known as a katsa) for the State of Israel against its enemies or those perceived to be unfavorable politically to Israeli policy." Sayanim are not paid and are only reimbursed for their expenses.[1] https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Sayanim & Hasbara is the Hebrew word for 'Explanation'[1][2][3] and is a term used by the State of Israel and by independent groups to describe their efforts to explain Israeli government policies, and to promote Israel to the world at large. Others view hasbara as a euphemism for propaganda.[4][5][6] Hasbara tends to portray Israel as fighting on two fronts: A hostile, native, non-Jewish Palestinian population and Israel's surrounding Arab States World opinion. The latter is the province of Hasbara. All problems in public relations may be put down to inadequate hasbara. https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Hasbara/History Did Israel steal bomb-grade uranium from the United States? By Victor Gilinsky, Roger J. Mattson | April 17, 2014 Last month the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP), the nation’s highest classification authority, released a number of top-level government memoranda that shed additional light on the so-called NUMEC affair, "the story that won't go away—the possibility that in the 1960s, Israel stole bomb-grade uranium from a US nuclear fuel-processing plant.” The evidence available for our 2010 Bulletin article persuaded us that Israel did steal uranium from the Apollo, Pennsylvania, plant of the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC). We urged the US government to declassify CIA and FBI documents to settle the matter. In releasing the current batch—the release being largely due to the persistent appeals of researcher Grant Smith—the government has been careful to excise from all the released documents the CIA’s reasons for fingering Israel. Despite this, the documents are significantly revealing. For one thing, the excisions themselves are a backhanded admission of the persuasiveness of the CIA’s evidence. (Why these excisions are legally justified is not apparent—after nearly 50 years, the “sources and methods” issues have long ago dissipated.) https://thebulletin.org/2014/04/did-israel-steal-bomb-grade-uranium-from-the-united-states/ Jonathan Pollard Was One of the Most Damaging Spies in US History When Jonathan Pollard was convicted of espionage in 1987, he became the first American to go to jail for life for passing secrets to a U.S. ally. The top-secret information Pollard passed on to Israel is so vast and damaging, the complete list of files is itself top secret. He was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 30 years. There are few things both liberals and conservatives agree on these days, but keeping Pollard in prison for the rest of his life was one of them. Yet, he was released in 2015 and quickly made his way to Israel -- where he received a hero’s welcome. Pollard became an intelligence analyst for the U.S. Navy in Maryland in 1979. Almost immediately, his security clearance was revoked because he divulged classified information to a South African defense attache in 1980, according to the CIA’s “Pollard Damage Assessment report, issued after his arrest. Without an extensive investigation, the report says, it was returned, and he went back to work at the Office of Naval Intelligence. https://www.military.com/history/jonathan-pollard-was-one-of-most-damaging-spies-us-history.html Edited May 31 by Macnamara 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 Holistic Doctors dying The recent death of Dr Buttar, who claimed he had been 'poisoned' before his death, has brought to mind an old thread that existed on the original David Icke forum which was tracking the mysterious and often suspicious deaths of holistic doctors. The thread had exceeded 100 deaths before the forum went off air. In doing a quick search to see if i could find any info about that i stumbled across something that might be of interest. I found a website dated to BEFORE the covid scamdemic that was claiming 100 microbiologists had died suspiciously which also brings to mind the death of the inventor of the PCR test in 2019 right before the covid scamdemic. There was also a female microbiologist murdered, in recent years, whilst attending a conference in crete. Do your own search into holistic doctor deaths; there were a lot of them and under some very dodgy circumstances... So yeah.....deaths of not only holistic doctors who might offer an alternative medicine to that offered under the allopathic, big pharma model of 'healthcare' but also the deaths of many microbiologists who i suppose might have been able to refute the covid scamdemic had they been alive: Sad – so many good doctors, microbiologists, inventors, scientists etc. have their lives ended when most are just trying to help people. List of Dead Microbiologists January 11, 2014 https://prepareforchange.net/2016/02/20/list-of-over-100-dead-microbiologists/ 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 (edited) Military Apparatus being turned on its own people: Army spied on lockdown critics: Sceptics, including our own Peter Hitchens, long suspected they were under surveillance. Now we've obtained official records that prove they were right all along Military operatives were part of an operation that targeted politicians and high-profile journalists who raised doubts about the official pandemic response READ MORE: Critics slam £14.9bn of 'extraordinary waste' on overpriced, faulty or unused pandemic-era equipment By Glen Owen Political Editor Published: 22:05 BST, 28 January 2023 | Updated: 09:38 BST, 29 January 2023 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11687675/Army-spied-lockdown-critics-Sceptics-including-Peter-Hitchens-suspected-watched.html & Inside the Pentagon’s New “Perception Management” Office to Counter Disinformation Published: May 29, 2023 NOT LONG AFTER the 9/11 attacks, the Bush administration launched what it called the Office of Strategic Influence, which would seek to “counter the enemy’s perception management” in the so-called war on terror. But it quickly became clear that the office, operating under Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, would be managing those perceptions with its own disinformation. As the New York Times reported at the time, its work was to “provide news items, possibly including false ones, to foreign journalists in an effort to influence overseas opinion.” In the nascent Internet age, observers worried the propaganda could boomerang back on Americans. “The question is whether the Pentagon and military should undertake an official program that uses disinformation to shape perceptions abroad,” the Times reported in 2004. “But in a modern world wired by satellite television and the Internet, any misleading information and falsehoods could easily be repeated by American news outlets.” Now, two decades later, “perception management” is once again becoming a central focus for the national security state. On March 1, 2022, the Pentagon established a new office with similar goals to the one once deemed too controversial to remain open. Very little has been made public about the effort, which The Intercept learned about through a review of budget documents and an internal memo we obtained. This iteration is called the Influence and Perception Management Office, or IPMO, according to the memo, which was produced by the office for an academic institution, and its responsibilities include overseeing and coordinating the various counter-disinformation efforts being conducted by the military, which can include the U.S.’s own propaganda abroad. https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/84755/inside-the-pentagons-new-perception-management-office-to-counter.html & How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction. <!--more--> Glenn Greenwald February 24 2014, 6:25 p.m. One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that story, complete with the relevant documents. Over the last several weeks, I worked with NBC News to publish a series of articles about “dirty trick” tactics used by GCHQ’s previously secret unit, JTRIG (Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group). These were based on four classified GCHQ documents presented to the NSA and the other three partners in the English-speaking “Five Eyes” alliance. Today, we at the Intercept are publishing another new JTRIG document, in full, entitled “The Art of Deception: Training for Online Covert Operations.” By publishing these stories one by one, our NBC reporting highlighted some of the key, discrete revelations: the monitoring of YouTube and Blogger, the targeting of Anonymous with the very same DDoS attacks they accuse “hacktivists” of using, the use of “honey traps” (luring people into compromising situations using sex) and destructive viruses. But, here, I want to focus and elaborate on the overarching point revealed by all of these documents: namely, that these agencies are attempting to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse, and in doing so, are compromising the integrity of the internet itself. Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. Here is one illustrative list of tactics from the latest GCHQ document we’re publishing today: https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/ Edited May 31 by Macnamara 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 Fluoride in Our Water | 2 Alarming New Studies 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Crabtree Posted June 4 Share Posted June 4 (edited) I know this sounds a bit weird, but I have to de-scale our glass kettle quite a lot, sometimes less than once a fortnight, people around our estate say it's because of 'hard water' I'm not so sure, if it does that to a glass kettle, what does it do to our insides and other body tissues? Admittedly our estate is considered by outsiders to be a bit rough, but does the water have to be 'hard' too? Edited June 4 by Mr Crabtree 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 4 Share Posted June 4 On 5/31/2023 at 9:52 PM, Macnamara said: Military Apparatus being turned on its own people: Army spied on lockdown critics: Sceptics, including our own Peter Hitchens, long suspected they were under surveillance. Now we've obtained official records that prove they were right all along Government Had ‘Chilling’ Secret Unit to Curb Lockdown Dissent by Toby Young 3 June 2023 7:00 AM Critics of Covid restrictions were targeted by a counter-disinformation team at the heart of the Government, according to a Telegraph investigation. Here’s how it begins. A secretive Government unit worked with social media companies in an attempt to curtail discussion of controversial lockdown policies during the pandemic, the Telegraph can reveal. The Counter-Disinformation Unit (CDU) was set up by ministers to tackle supposed domestic “threats”, and was used to target those critical of lockdown and questioning the mass vaccination of children. Critics of lockdown had posts removed from social media. There is growing suspicion that social media firms used technology to stop the posts being promoted, circulated or widely shared after being flagged by the CDU or its counterpart in the Cabinet Office. Documents revealed under Freedom of Information (FoI) and data protection requests showed that the activities of prominent critics of the Government’s Covid policies were secretly monitored. An artificial intelligence firm (AI) was used by the Government to scour social media sites. The company flagged discussions opposing vaccine passports. Many of the issues being raised were valid at the time and have since been proven to be well-founded. The BBC also took part in secretive meetings of a government policy forum to address the so-called disinformation. On Friday, MPs and freedom of speech campaigners condemned the disclosures as “truly chilling” and “a tool for censoring British citizens” akin to those of the Chinese Communist Party. Much of the Government’s wider work on disinformation is shrouded in secrecy for “national security” reasons. Large parts of official documents are still redacted. https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/03/government-had-chilling-secret-unit-to-curb-lockdown-dissent/ Government Nudge Units Find the “Best” Ways to Manipulate the Public By Marie Hawthorne Global Research, June 02, 2023 The Organic Prepper 1 June 2023 The concept of “nudging” people into making better choices became popular with the book Nudge—Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, authored by Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein, and published in 2008. Their book defines a nudge as: . . .any aspect of the choice architecture that alters people’s behavior in a predictable way without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives. To count as a mere nudge, the intervention must be easy and cheap to avoid. Nudges are not mandates. Putting fruit at eye level counts as a nudge. Banning junk food does not. (p.6) The British government established its first Behavioural Insights Team in 2010. It began as a seven-person team within a Cabinet Office nicknamed the “Nudge Unit” then became an independent social purpose company in 2014 before being purchased by Nesta, a larger social purpose company, in 2021. https://www.globalresearch.ca/govt-nudge-units-find-best-ways-manipulate-public/5821152 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campion Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 17 hours ago, Mr Crabtree said: I know this sounds a bit weird, but I have to de-scale our glass kettle quite a lot, sometimes less than once a fortnight, people around our estate say it's because of 'hard water' I'm not so sure, if it does that to a glass kettle, what does it do to our insides and other body tissues? Admittedly our estate is considered by outsiders to be a bit rough, but does the water have to be 'hard' too? The conventional wisdom used to be that hard water has some health benefits and lowers your risk of cardiovascular disease. But if it's a problem you can use a filter. But as with any health advice on the internet, don't take my word for it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 Conspiracy Theories that have come true. https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=3X17U22HM6NM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 Government censorship... The Sound of Silence: Law Enforcement’s Role in Curtailing Free Speech By The Exposé on June 6, 2023 n both the United Kingdom and the United States, the principle of free speech—the right to express opinions without censorship or restraint—has long been a cornerstone of democracy. However, the past decade has witnessed a significant decline in this fundamental right. While some might argue that these changes are necessary for protecting individuals from hate speech and misinformation, others rightly worry that they signify an erosion of democratic values. Shrinking Freedom in the United Kingdom Online Harms White Paper: Introduced in April 2019, the Online Harms White Paper outlined the UK government’s plan to make the UK “the safest place in the world to be online.” The proposal recommends establishing a new independent regulator for social media sites, platforms, and other online services. Companies would be legally required to take action against a defined set of online harms, ranging from illegal activity and content to behaviors that are harmful but not necessarily illegal. While protecting users, particularly children, from online harm is paramount, critics argue that the White Paper’s language is vague and extremely suppressive. For example, one provision addresses “disinformation” and “fake news” without providing a clear definition for these terms, leading to worries that it could be manipulated to curtail free speech. https://expose-news.com/2023/06/06/law-enforcements-role-in-curtailing-free-speech/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 Control of the media.....i'm not going to mention operation mocking bird as the thread is asking for things that have been officially accepted as true but this article makes a strong case for the control of the media. The consolidation of the media into a handful of mega-corporations is also official fact. 15 Reasons Why Mass Media Employees Act Like Propagandists Caitlin Johnstone June 6, 2023 If you watch Western news media with a critical eye you eventually notice how their reporting consistently aligns with the interests of the US-centralized empire, in almost the same way you’d expect them to if they were government-run propaganda outlets. The New York Times has reliably supported every war the US has waged. Western mass media focus overwhelmingly on foreign protests against governments the United States dislikes while paying far less attention to widespread protests against US-aligned governments. The only time Trump was universally showered with praise by the mass media was when he bombed Syria, while the only time Biden has been universally slammed by the mass media was when he withdrew from Afghanistan. US media did such a good job deceitfully marrying Saddam Hussein to the September 11 attacks in the minds of the public in the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq that seven in ten Americans still believed he was connected to 9/11 months after the war began. That this extreme bias occurs is self-evident and indisputable to anyone who pays attention, but why and how it happens is harder to see. The uniformity is so complete and so consistent that when people first begin noticing these patterns it’s common for them to assume the media must be controlled by a small, centralized authority much like the state media of more openly authoritarian governments. But if you actually dig into the reasons why the media act the way they act, that isn’t really what you find. Instead, what you find is a much larger, much less centralized network of factors which tips the scales of media coverage to the advantage of the US empire and the forces which benefit from it. Some of it is indeed conspiratorial in nature and happens in secret, but most of it is essentially out in the open. Here are 15 of those factors. click here to see the 15 factors: https://www.activistpost.com/2023/06/15-reasons-why-mass-media-employees-act-like-propagandists.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 The day israel attacked the US navy: The Great Betrayal of June 8, 1967: Israel’s Attack on the USS Liberty is Never Mentioned by the US Political Establishment and the Mainstream Media Question is Why? By Timothy Alexander Guzman Global Research, June 08, 2023 Fifty-Six Years Ago, June 8, 1967 With a very few exceptions, it’s barely mentioned in the mainstream media whether it’s CNN, MSNBC, FOX news, The New York Times, or the Washington Post. It is never mentioned in public school history books and forget Hollywood, no movie would ever be produced on that tragic day since Zionists conspirators run the movie industry. And of course, the most treasonous people to their own country, the Israeli-controlled US political establishment would never dare mention what happened on June 8th, 1967 when America’s most treasured ally, the ‘Jewish State’ of Israel attacked the USS Liberty, a US Navy technical research ship which was basically a spy ship, killing 34 and injured over 171 crew members including marines, US Naval personal including officers, seamen and even a civilian employee from the National Security Agency (NSA). The attack on the USS Liberty happened during the height of the Six-Day War between Israel and the Arab world that included Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and to an extent Iraq, however, the US had claimed ‘neutral status’ and was in international waters towards the north of the Sinai Peninsula before the war had even started. Then the USS Liberty was ordered to sail towards the eastern Mediterranean Sea to collect intelligence close to the north coast of Sinai, Egypt. During their mission, the Israel Air Force (IAF) had flown over the USS Liberty supposedly searching for Egyptian submarines that was previously located near the coast. At around 2 pm, the IAF sent two Mirage III fighter jets to monitor the USS Liberty which the Israelis say had no “distinguishable markings” or any flag on the ship which was a lie and then the Mirage fighters opened fire on the USS Liberty. Here is where it gets complicated, right before the attack, the Mirage fighter jets, codename Kursa had communicated with an Israeli command post weapons systems officer, air controllers and a chief air controller who reportedly questioned whether there was a US ship in the area, so at around 1:57 pm, the chief air controller, Lieutenant-Colonel Shmuel Kislev gave the orders to attack the USS Liberty. The Israeli fighter jets unleashed 30-mm cannons, rockets, and napalm thus killing and injuring many of the US crew members. The Israelis even managed to jam-up the US communications systems right before the attack which means that the Israelis knew that it was an American Naval ship. On top of the Israeli fighter jets already attacking the USS Liberty, there were three additional Israeli torpedo boats who also launched an attack on the ship with cannons, mounted machine guns and torpedoes. One of the torpedo’s killed 25 crew members instantly. The Israeli torpedo boats also targeted life rafts as the crew tried to abandon the ship. It was clear that Israel and the Lyndon B. Johnson regime wanted no witnesses who could have exposed Israel’s attack to the American public. How do we know this? At 3:15, two Israeli helicopters armed with IDF soldiers were most likely supposed to kill the remaining US naval survivors, for whatever reason, that did not happen. Meanwhile, the ship was still under an immense attack as the crew called for help through open lines of communications. Two US Naval ships, the USS Saratoga and the USS America received the message and ordered US fighter jets to rescue the ship from the attack, but in a rather strange move, the mission was called off by Washington. Israel also knew that the US fighter jets were ordered to stop the attack from an intercepted transmission. So they immediately called off their attack and recalled their torpedo boats and helicopters. Then the Israeli government notified Washington that they “mistakenly” attacked an American ship and told them that they had ordered its fighter jets to return back to their airbase. Call it what you want, but it is a legitimate conspiracy fact that US President Lyndon B. Johnson and his Defense Secretary, Robert McNamara halted a rescue mission to save the remaining survivors. It seems that it was a false-flag operation to get the US to enter the conflict and support Israel at all costs against several Arab countries. A high-ranking official by the name of Admiral L. R. Geis, who was the commander of the Sixth Fleet carrier force told Lt. Commander, David Lewis of the USS Liberty that he challenged McNamara’s orders to cancel the rescue operation. It was reported that McNamara responded by saying that “President Johnson is not going to go to war or embarrass an American ally over a few sailors.” A communications officer, J.Q. “Tony” Hart from a U.S. Navy communications relay station in Morocco oversaw the entire transmission, also gave the same testimony. The Prospect of a Major False-Flag Operation in the Middle-East Grows by the Day: Remembering June 8th, 1967 the Day Israel Attacked the USS Liberty There were multiple investigations on what happened to the USS Liberty, and of course, both the US and Israeli governments declared that it was a “mistake”, but crew members said it was deliberate. Who was right? The crew members of course, but no one knows about their experiences because these same politicians who claim they care about their military veterans never mention what happened on that day. It’s an important day to remember. So, the question we must ask is why most people in the US don’t know what happened on June 8th, 1967? Every single politician, whether they are presidents, senators, the US congress, governors, etc., no one ever mentions the Israeli attack on the USS liberty. Do these same politicians and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) consider it “Anti-Semitic” to mention what happened on that day? I would have to say, yes. The Chicago Tribune’s 2007 Article On October 7th, 2007, The Chicago Tribune published a controversial story called ‘New Revelations in Attack on American Spy ship‘, although there was nothing to suggest that it was a “new revelation” since the veterans or shall we call them victims of the USS liberty attack have been speaking out since the day it happened. However, the Chicago Tribune did report on the anger and betrayal felt by the USS Liberty veterans by their government on behalf of their most treasured ally, Israel “that it never intercepted the communications of the attacking Israeli pilots — communications, according to those who remember seeing them, that showed the Israelis knew they were attacking an American naval vessel.” Was there a joint cover-up by Washington and Tel Aviv? You decide, “The documents also suggest that the U.S. government, anxious to spare Israel’s reputation and preserve its alliance with the U.S., closed the case with what even some of its participants now say was a hasty and seriously flawed investigation.” The National Security Agency (NSA) also made itself conveniently neutral on the matter: In declassifying the most recent and largest batch of materials last June 8, the 40th anniversary of the attack, the NSA, this country’s chief U.S. electronic-intelligence-gatherer and code-breaker, acknowledged that the attack had “become the center of considerable controversy and debate.” It was not the agency’s intention, it said, “to prove or disprove any one set of conclusions, many of which can be drawn from a thorough review of this material,” available here. One of the most absurd explanations on the USS Liberty attack was published in the Jewish Virtual Library by a New York born and former Israeli Ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren who published ‘The USS Liberty Incident: “The USS Liberty: Case Closed’. Of course, Oren’s claims that the media, journalists and even websites who exposed the attack on the USS Liberty are anti-Semitic hatemongers and Arab propagandists: The claim that Israel’s attack on the Liberty was premeditated has also appeared persistently in the press. In 1992, nationally syndicated columnists Roland Evans and Robert Novak dedicated a column, “Twenty-Five Years of Cover-Up,” to this charge. Similar accusations have been aired on television programs such as ABC’s 20/20 and Geraldo Rivera’s Now It Can Be Told. The claim is particularly widespread on the Internet, where a search for the “USS Liberty” yields dozens of sites, from those of Arab propagandists (Birzeit.edu, Salam.org, Palestine Forever) and anti-Semitic hate mongers (The Tangled Web, Jew Watch) to the award-winning USS Liberty Homepage, posted by Ennes and other veterans. But while the tenor of these pages may differ – the veterans abjure any anti-Semitism, stressing that several of their crewmates were Jewish – their conclusions are indistinguishable: Israel wantonly attacked the Liberty with the intention of killing every man on board, and then thwarted attempts to investigate the crime. Refuting this accusation was difficult if not impossible in the past when the official records on the Liberty were designated top-secret and closed to the general public. With the recent declassification of these documents in the United States and Israel, however, researchers have gained access to a wealth of primary sources – Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and U.S. military records, Israeli diplomatic correspondence, and memoranda from both the State Department and the White House. With the aid of these materials, the attack on the Liberty can now be reconstructed virtually minute-by-minute and with remarkable detail. The picture that emerges is not one of crime at all, nor even of criminal negligence, but of a string of failed communications, human errors, unfortunate coincidences, and equipment failures on both the American and Israeli sides – the kind of tragic, senseless mistake that is all too common in the thick of war In Oren’s conclusion, he does blame Israel, but for numerous “errors” it had committed at the height of the attack. “The Israelis, too, committed their own share of fateful errors, as the Yerushalmi report points out: The erroneous reports of bombardment at El-Arish, the failure to replace the Liberty’s marker on the board after it had been cleared, the over-eagerness of naval commanders, and worst of all, Ensign Yifrah’s miscalculation of the ship’s speed.” Now that’s a lame excuse: Though Yerushalmi’s report suggested reasons for these errors – inflexible naval procedures, the inaccuracy of speed-measuring devices – one is still left with a sense of poor organization and sloppy execution. Moreover, there were breakdowns in communications between the Israeli navy and air force stemming from inadequate command structure and the immense pressures of a multi-front war. To these factors must be added Israel’s general sensitivity about its coastal defenses, and the exhaustion of its pilots after four days of uninterrupted combat. Yet none of these amount to the kind of gross negligence of which the Israelis have been accused. And then there were “bad breaks” that are unfortunately commonplace in war: The U.S. planes that were called back because of their nuclear payload (their mere presence might have warded off the torpedo boats); the Liberty’s inability to signal the approaching Israeli boats, and the machine gunner who fired on them; and the smoke that hid the identities of both the attackers and the attacked. All of these elements combined to create a tragic “friendly fire” incident of the kind that claimed the lives of at least fifty Israeli soldiers in the Six Day War, and caused 5,373 American casualties in Vietnam in 1967 alone.53 Obviously, these findings can do little to lessen the suffering of those American servicemen who were wounded in the incident, nor can they be expected to offer comfort to the families of the dead. But they should at least permit us to bring to a close what has for a generation remained one of the most painful chapters in the history of America’s relationship with the State of Israel Michael Oren says the attack was not a crime, but a timeline of failures that included failed communications to human errors as an unfortunate coincidence, in other words, he concludes that the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty was a “friendly fire” incident. In an article from April 22nd, 2021, I mentioned an interesting research project published by the US Army War College called the ‘Assault on the USS Liberty: Deliberate or Tragic Accident?‘ by Colonel Peyton E. Smith. Colonel Smith concluded that the attack on the USS Liberty was a deliberate act, “The attack was most likely deliberate for reasons far too sensitive to be disclosed by the US (or) Israeli government and that the truth may never be known.” According to Smith, the US and Israeli governments need to release the data, “Based on the testimony of many eyewitnesses and the memoirs of senior government officials, the attack on the USS Liberty was most likely deliberate. Unfortunately, this issue may go to the grave unresolved unless the US government and the government of Israel release all data related to the incident” but as we all know, that won’t never happen. The truth is that Israel attacked the USS Liberty as a false-flag operation to get the US into the Six-Day War just like they did many years later with their relentless propaganda for the US to lead the war against Iraq. And as we all know, the big lie on the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had in his arsenal by the Israel-backed Bush regime led to the tragic war killing and injuring countless Iraqis. Israel has a plan to dominate the Middle East as it attempts to destroy another major country in the Middle East and that country is Iran, a major obstacle to its long-term plan to ultimately control the Arab world. Make no mistake, Israel wants the US to continue to sacrifice its sons and daughters as cannon fodder in another Middle East conflict to defend and protect ‘God’s chosen people. As we all know, the US political establishment is bought and paid for by the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and we must include the US Bible Belt fanatics who support Israel at all costs. But there is another unique problem for the former US president, Donald J. Trump who said that Israel does not control congress anymore and for 2024 GOP candidate, that’s a problem. The US political establishment, both Democrats and Republicans and of course, the Zionist controlled mainstream media never talk about what happened on June 8th, 1967. No politicians from Lyndon B. Johnson to Joe Biden, none of them would ever dare to mention what happened on that day because all of them are financed and controlled, and that’s not a conspiracy theory. Listen to the words of Ron Grantski, USS Liberty Survivor: ‘Attack on the USS Liberty Recalled’: https://www.globalresearch.ca/great-betrayal-67-us-political-establishment-mainstream-media-israel-deliberate-attack-uss-liberty-is-never-mentioned-question-why/5821583 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 The day a pseudo-pandemic was caused in a hospital through false positive test results from PCR tests: Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t By Gina Kolata Jan. 22, 2007 Dr. Brooke Herndon, an internist at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, could not stop coughing. For two weeks starting in mid-April last year, she coughed, seemingly nonstop, followed by another week when she coughed sporadically, annoying, she said, everyone who worked with her. Before long, Dr. Kathryn Kirkland, an infectious disease specialist at Dartmouth, had a chilling thought: Could she be seeing the start of a whooping cough epidemic? By late April, other health care workers at the hospital were coughing, and severe, intractable coughing is a whooping cough hallmark. And if it was whooping cough, the epidemic had to be contained immediately because the disease could be deadly to babies in the hospital and could lead to pneumonia in the frail and vulnerable adult patients there. It was the start of a bizarre episode at the medical center: the story of the epidemic that wasn’t. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html In the end it turned out that the people testing positive for whooping cough did not have whooping cough and the panic was created over nothing. This lesson was forgotten in the 2020 covid pseudo-pandemic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 That government and big pharma knew ahead of the covid jab roll out that the jabs would cause harm to the public: COVID Propaganda Roundup: Pfizer Knew mRNA Shots Sicken Infants in April 2021 By Ben Bartee Global Research, June 09, 2023 Per internal Pfizer documents forced into the public domain by court decree, we know now that the company knew way back in April 2021 of the risks its mRNA gene therapy posed to infants. Via Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review: “[Pfizer’s] safety database was searched for all BNT162b2 vaccine cases reporting any exposure to vaccine during pregnancy (mother and/or baby) or exposure to baby via lactation from all time through 28 February 2021. A search of the Pfizer safety database identified 673 case reports. … Of the 673 case reports identified in the search, 458 involved BNT162b2 exposure during pregnancy (mother/fetus) and 215 involved exposure during breast-feeding… In 174 of the 215 reports, there was no AE reported other than ‘Exposure via breast milk/maternal exposure during breast feeding’. In the remaining 41 cases, AEs were reported in the infants following BNT162b2 exposure via lactation.” Doing some quick math, this means that Pfizer documented adverse effects in no less than 19% of the babies – almost 1 in 5 — that it observed to be exposed to the spike proteins produced by their mRNA shot. None of these findings, of course, were voluntarily disclosed by Pfizer, the Public Health™ authorities, or the corporate state media that the biomedical state effectively owns. To this very day, as a matter of fact, the CDC recommends that all pregnant women get shot up, as does the legacy media. “On Tuesday, the WHO issued an alert that there had been a rise in ‘severe myocarditis’ in newborns and infants between June 2022 and March 2023 in Wales and England,” per The Epoch Times. Via World Health Organization: “On 5 April 2023, the National IHR Focal Point for the United Kingdom informed WHO of an increase in severe myocarditis in neonates and infants associated with enterovirus infection in Wales compared with 2021. Between June 2022 and March 2023, 15 neonates and young infants presented with a picture consistent with neonatal sepsis in Wales and Southwest England. Enterovirus Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing of nine cases confirmed the presence of either coxsackie B3 or coxsackie B4. As of 20 April 2023, three patients were hospitalized, four patients were being managed as outpatients and two had died.” Enterovirus, unlike mRNA manipulation for pregnant women, is nothing new. It is also not uncommon at all. Yet, in the same report, the WHO concedes that only one case of infant myocarditis in the same region was identified in the previous six years. So, all of a sudden, apropos of nothing, infants magically develop a surge in myocarditis due to enterovirus? That’s how The Science™ works. WHO head warns of ‘even deadlier pandemic’ coming WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus appeared at the United Nations to issue a biomedical threat couched as a humanitarian warning: “The end of COVID-19 as a global health emergency is not the end of COVID-19 as a global health threat. The threat of another variant emerging that causes new surges of disease and death remains, and the threat of another pathogen emerging with even deadlier potential remains.” What does this little weasel know that the public doesn’t? And why is he not under investigation by the International Criminal Court for making terroristic threats? Does he know some inside baseball on the clandestine US biolabs scattered across the world, including in the active warzone of Ukraine? First-Ever COVID vaxx injury lawsuits takes off The COVID vaxx manufacturers Pfizer, Moderna, et al. are – illegitimately, in my view – immune from any liability for damages caused to people who took their experimental gene therapies. But the government actors who collude with them are not immune from violating the First Amendment by censoring COVID “misinformation.” Via the New Civil Liberties Alliance: “[NCLA] filed a lawsuit challenging the federal government’s ongoing efforts to work in concert with social media companies and the Stanford Internet Observatory’s Virality Project to monitor and censor online support groups catering to those injured by Covid vaccines… The Plaintiffs have all been heavily censored on social media for sharing their personal experiences, exchanging advice, medical research, and support with others who were medically harmed after taking the vaccine. For posting about their personal experiences and trying to connect with others in the vaccine-injured community, Plaintiffs’ speech has repeatedly been flagged as misinformation or removed entirely. Their social media accounts are at constant risk of being frozen or disabled just for engaging with other users in private support groups open only to vaccine-injured individuals and sharing perspectives the government deems misinformation. Even if they were spreading false information, under the First Amendment the federal government plays no role in policing these Plaintiffs’ private speech or picking winners and losers in the marketplace of ideas. Nor may the government induce, encourage, or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish—that is, censor truthful speech about vaccine injuries. But that is just what the federal government has been doing as it chips away at the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech and replaces it with government-induced censorship.” The named defendants include: White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra White House Digital Director for the COVID-19 Response Team Clark Humphrey Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas Joseph Biden Former Biden press secretary and current MSNBC news actor Jen Psaki wasn’t shy in her former position about directing the censorship campaign directly from the presidential podium. Their hubris demonstrates how far down the tyrannical rabbit hole we’ve fallen. The unconstitutionality is patently obvious. Given that, the real question for those of us in favor of justice getting meted out good and hard have to wonder: why aren’t the feckless GOP pharma cucks in the Republican-majority House of Representatives pushing harder on this front? Perhaps, the question answers itself. https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-propaganda-roundup-pfizer-knew-mrna-shots-sicken-infants-april-2021/5821836 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 Digital ID's....tony blair tried to foist ID cards into the british people but was rebuffed. As the covid business began there was talk in the independent media about the rockefellers 'ID2020' scheme and now sure enough we see a global push for digital ID's which are being justified as a way to combat 'pandemics' but really they have been a long held desire of the globalist cabal for a long time as they want to control every aspect of everyones lives: WHO Plots To Use EU Vaccine Passport Tech To Form Global Digital Health Certificates Published: June 7, 2023 The World Health Organization (WHO) announced it will adopt the European Union’s digital Covid vaccine passport framework to create a global network of digital health certificates. What was long maligned as a conspiracy theory is coming to pass. The new initiative will be called the Global Digital Health Certification Network. Read about the dangers of vaccine passports and how they kill civil liberties here. The WHO said it will “take up the European Union (EU) system of digital COVID-19 certification to establish a global system that will help facilitate global mobility and protect citizens across the world from on-going and future health threats.” The EU’s Covid vaccine certificate was enforced in July 2021 and issued to over 2.3 billion people. In a statement, WHO’s Director-General Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus said that “building on the EU’s highly successful digital certification network, WHO aims to offer all WHO Member States access to an open-source digital health tool.” “New digital health products in development aim to help people everywhere receive quality health services quickly and more effectively,” he added. The European Commissioner for Health and Food Safety, Stella Kyriakides said: “Today is a new chapter in global cooperation on digital health. It will help to place WHO at the center of our global health architecture.” The WHO’s new initiative comes at a time when the use of vaccine passports has reduced and after the global public health organization said that Covid was no longer a public health emergency. Critics of vaccine passports argue that they could be used to discriminate and deny people access to public services. Others view them as an invasion of privacy by equipping governments with the power to spy on people’s health, as well as create a checkpoint society. The idea of a global vaccine passport was criticized by Australian senator Alex Antic, who argued that it was “just another conspiracy theory coming true.” https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/84818/who-plots-to-use-eu-vaccine-passport-tech-to-form-global-digital-health.html 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.