Jump to content

In 1966, James Paul McCartney was killed in a car crash and replaced with a double; a session musician by the name William Shears Campbell. (aka Billy Shears) It was and still remains the biggest kept secret in music.


sickofallthebollocks

Recommended Posts

Back on the (alleged) replacement of Paul, but does anyone think these are the same person?

 

?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.7OFY4gIofd9yvwBb8JNJZgHaFS%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=3cc011b3ade266e21685711e5c6be2f1c4482f9ca47e5865202a7f462f69b4c5&ipo=images

 

97eef46d10b83722cac8b7e60c4a119f.jpg

 

I know people tend to use the 67 LSD interview as a comparison with Paul from 1964 or August 1966, but for me it's hard to decide whether they are two different people or the same person. There are lots of other photos and videos you can put together to compare. I did once show the 1964 Frost interview of Paul and the 67 LSD interview with Faul to someone who had never heard of the theory that Paul McCartney was replaced, and this person said they were two different people and said they even sounded different. I've heard about the twin brother theory but people have told me there is no evidence of this, so if they are two different people that leaves us with a doppelganger. The argument debunkers make is that Paul simply aged due to drugs, ageing and changing his appearing with the hair style and clothing. Faul seems to have green eyes whereas Paul's were (supposedly) brown or hazel, but the debunkers will state green eyes can often change colour appearing brown-ish. 

 

Tina Foster of the Plastic Macca blogsite (her real name is Cynthia Hodges apparently) believes that the Beatles were originally an organic group but had been hijacked at the point when they changed their image and music, and from 67 onwards all four Beatles had been replaced by doubles/imposters/doppelgangers. None of the other PID researchers believe the Beatles were ever an organic band.

Edited by Occulus5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

This is the truth about Yoko Ono.
 

Yoko Ono is a powerful witch. She used powerful occult energy, imperceptible to conventional people, to overpower and control John Lennon. The reason why her singing sounds like the wailing of a witch is because she is one. A normal person cannot make this sound, it is impossible. Yoko used to go to witches meetings in New York, driven there by her chauffeur. In Peter Jackson's 'Get Back' she appears to be just quietly sitting in the room, what she is actually doing is training powerful occult energy on John Lennon. A suitably gifted medium, psychic or shaman would be able to perceive this, conventional people would not. The reason why so many dislike her, some intensely, is because they are picking up on what she is. She is very, very with the dark side, or in biblical terms, the satanic side.

 

////  ////  ////

 

Why would John Lennon even love her?


She was able to get into his system using the dark arts. It wasn't real love at all, he was captured, a prisoner.

Edited by SuperstarNeilC
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SuperstarNeilC said:

Predictive programming 

 

Twin Towers & Covid masks 

 

I've never heard of any Julian Lennon songs, but when I listened to Saltwater I kept thinking to myself "where have I heard that song before?", and I remembered, it was from an episode of Only Fools and Horses, I think it was from the Miami Twice episode when Del and Rodney find that their campervan has been broken into (kind of an odd choice of song to have been playing at that Miami night club they were drinking at). I don't know what Occultic influence Julian Lennon would have have on people, yes he was John Lennon's son, but he's hardly got a massive following like his father had. But yeah that music video seemed strange with the people wearing masks, but I'm sure the debunkers will be able to explain that one away. Never heard Mark Devlin mention that music video before, and he's talked quite alot of predictive programming in album covers and music videos. 

Edited by Occulus5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 7/10/2025 at 4:38 PM, SuperstarNeilC said:

Mind Control & The Royal Bloodlines of Jane Asher - Part 2

 

Interesting discussion in the video link. I don't know what to make of Mike Williams, from what I've heard he doesn't take too kindly to comments on his channel from people who disagree with his opinions, even if he states they are just his opinions, and I think he will ban anyone who doesn't follow a certain view when it comes to PID. And what's with the trademark on his "Sage of Quay" name? it's hardly a company or a business. Abit OTT, but he's American and they tend to be abit OTT. 

 

Regarding the bloodlines, yes I agree with Mike and Dom about the counter argument that people will say that anyone can be traced back to royal or ancient bloodlines if they go further back, and I agree what they said that this is completely different. This kind of genealogy-bloodline connection is what Miles Mathis writes alot about, but to be honest alot of what Mathis writes when it comes to so called links to the peerage with certain people, IMO, is just nonsense. 

 

What I'm more interested in when it comes to the Beatles is, what happened to real/original/biological Paul and who was he replaced by and how did the replacement look so much like Paul?. I don't buy this idea that the replacement had plastic surgery to make him look more like Paul. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/15/2025 at 9:18 AM, Occulus5 said:

don't buy this idea that the replacement had plastic surgery to make him look more like Paul. 

Maybe the replacement looked “similar” to Paul, but just needed a few “tweaks” to put him over the edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SuperstarNeilC said:

Maybe the replacement looked “similar” to Paul, but just needed a few “tweaks” to put him over the edge.

I don't know really. Looking at them both, one from 1964 to 1967 they look like they are related to me, either twins or cousins, but that doesn't really fit into the Billy Shepherd/Campbell way of thinking and the Scottish connection. I think some of the alleged anomalies in Paul and Faul's appearance and facial features can be explained away easily. Some have pointed out that Paul in one photo has a cleft chin and in other photos it shows him with no cleft. I've seen cleft chins on people I know, and I can tell you it is not always there, but it doesn't mean they've been replaced lol. Yes other things like the attached/detached ears is interesting and the longer face and thinner nose of Faul is obvious. As for eye colour, I think the lighting can affect the colour and make it appear green when it's supposed to be hazel/brown.

 

On the PID forums there's alot of suggestion that there have been at least 4 Paul's, but again this contradicts with there having been one Paul and then Billy. When I watch Paul/Faul from the rooftop session and the Let it Be recordings with the beard he has that early rounded face Paul than look about him rather than the longer faced Billy/Faul. I think Mark Devlin pointed out in one of his talks a few years ago where it showed what may've been a beard-less Paul during the 1969/70 studio recordings when he was supposed to have grown a full beard, so this maybe evidence that there was more than one Paul or Faul around at the same time, one sporting a beard and the other without one. 

Edited by Occulus5
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/8/2025 at 8:09 AM, SuperstarNeilC said:

“You will own nothing and be happy”.

 

- World Economic Forum 


////  ////  ////

 

“All you need is love”.

 

- The Beatles 

 

////  ////  ////

 

“Imagine no possessions”.

 

- John Lennon 

Looked at another way, possessions keep you tied to the system. There is a huge freedom in ridding yourself of all those ties.

JL also said no war. Nothing to kill or die for.

This thread is rather myopic in viewpoint. In the great scheme of things going on in the hologram world of Earth, this is so tiny. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE 

 

In 1966 when "Paul" & his close personal assistant Mal Evans returned to England from their trip to Africa together, the first order of business by Evans was to fire McCartney's household staff. They, of course, would have been the first to notice that something was amiss. This was long before the internet & social media, so it would not have been that difficult for handlers to have used some combination of bribery, threats &/or appeals to patriotism in order to convince the remaining relatively small handful of McCartney's closest family members & associates to cooperate with the replacement deception. Multiple different body doubles were utilized for various purposes (e.g., simple attendance at award shows), but the primary replacement (i.e., the one & only Billy Shears) was a trained & professionally-skilled multi-instrumentalist, composer, singer, producer and actor. Interestingly, a few years later when Mal Evans was only days away from submitting for publication the manuscript of his tell-all Beatles memoire, he was violently assassinated by the corrupt Los Angeles Police Department in a bizarre & contrived alleged domestic violence incident. Naturally, the manuscript conveniently disappeared and has never fully resurfaced in its original completed form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/25/2025 at 4:08 AM, SuperstarNeilC said:

QUOTE 

 

In 1966 when "Paul" & his close personal assistant Mal Evans returned to England from their trip to Africa together, the first order of business by Evans was to fire McCartney's household staff. They, of course, would have been the first to notice that something was amiss. This was long before the internet & social media, so it would not have been that difficult for handlers to have used some combination of bribery, threats &/or appeals to patriotism in order to convince the remaining relatively small handful of McCartney's closest family members & associates to cooperate with the replacement deception. Multiple different body doubles were utilized for various purposes (e.g., simple attendance at award shows), but the primary replacement (i.e., the one & only Billy Shears) was a trained & professionally-skilled multi-instrumentalist, composer, singer, producer and actor. Interestingly, a few years later when Mal Evans was only days away from submitting for publication the manuscript of his tell-all Beatles memoire, he was violently assassinated by the corrupt Los Angeles Police Department in a bizarre & contrived alleged domestic violence incident. Naturally, the manuscript conveniently disappeared and has never fully resurfaced in its original completed form.

So what happened to bio/original Paul (if there ever was one)? was Billy/Faul there right from the very beginning of the band forming, or did he come in later on?. what about the multiples which appear to have been there from the beginning and at the same time?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...