Greenhulk50 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 All this bullshit about Gary Lineker tweet him being taken off Match of the day by the BBC is just a total distraction from what they should really be talking about and that's Hancock ,Covid lockdowns for 2 years, the deaths of the elderly , vaccine deaths , suicides. Who the fuck actually watches BBC Match of the day? with tossers Lineker , Wright and Shearer , Footy fans watch Sky sport and BT sport if they want to watch football , not BBC bullshit . 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticWorld Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 (edited) How's it a distraction? They use sportsball to push multiculturalism and anti-British sentiment. It's like blackmailing the natives. "Want your favourite pundits back, then support asylum seekers!" Proper subversive stuff. Edited March 11 by EnigmaticWorld 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticWorld Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 White people are still the majority in the UK, what's wrong with having media that reflects that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 (edited) I think this whole question of whether or not lineker should be cancelled is not the real issue If people disagree with him then they should debate him and it would be nice if there WAS a proper public debate over immigration What Lineker is doing is a classic tactic of the left which is to say that anyone who disagrees with them is a 'nazi'. If you go and protest a drag queen story hour where grown men are dressing in a sexualised manner and then twerking in front of toddlers then the left will brand you a 'fascist'. If you question unchecked immigration then the left will call you a 'nazi' They do the same thing everytime and it is precisely to SHUT DOWN DEBATE as they do not want anyone to be able to have a clear and adult and open discussion about all of these matters. Its a form of playground, public shaming to try and silence any opposition to their agendas if you questioned lockdown then they would call you a 'lockdown denier' thereby implying that really you were a holocaust loving nazi If you questioned the covid jabs then they called you a 'refusenik' which was a communist term from the soviet union where the anti-fascist (now 'antifa' movement began) so thereby once again raising this spectre of fascism. To the left you can't just be a normal person concerned about how your world is being endlessly socially engineered in ways that are going to harm you, your children and society. No to the left if you question ANY OF IT then you are a flat out nazi It doesn't matter if you don't agree with the ideology of nationalist socialism as the goal for the left is not to be honest or fair. Their goal is to shut you up for long enough to destroy your world. Lets not also forget the hypocrisy here of the left who constantly call for people to be cancelled eg jeremy clarkson but when THEY want to push their agenda on society then suddenly that is a 'freedom of speech' issue as if they give a rats ass about freedom of speech! So yeah i think what we should really be discussing here is THEIR agendas and behaviours and how they keep trying to hide their own guilty behind projecting nasty and incorrect slurs onto others In the US recently they had a real, self-professed nazi group carry out an actual attack on the nations electrical infrastructure with the goal of casting baltimore into darkness. Baltimore had a large black population who would then have been left with no lighting, no heating and no means to cook food. That's a genuine 'hate crime' and yet the liberal media have been silent on this. The FBI love cooking up false plots that the liberal media then point to to try and claim that 'white supremacism' and the 'far right' are the biggest internal threat to america and yet when they actually get real nazis doing something they say nothing! Meanwhile they call anyone who is not a nationalist socialist or involved in anyway with any far right groups 'nazis' simply for questioning aspects of the left's agenda such as: -drag queen story hour -mass immigration -lockdowns and mandatory jabs looking at that list above its clear they have an agenda to cause us and our nation harm....and that list is only the tip of the iceburg Edited March 11 by Macnamara 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not Thoth Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 I find the Lineker story a bit interesting, perhaps because of the comments that it stirs, especially at a time when we are not allowed to have any real adult debate. Trouble is it's hard not to feel that this is also just another engineered theatrical crisis, linked to the problem reaction solution, and the wider agenda. A text to GB news at 12.50 ish, referred to the propaganda and lies in Germany that encouraged people to follow certain leaders ... which is something I have long believed to be true. Another comment from a caller mentioned why not give the money to the immigrants so they go back home. Peter asked would you be happy with your money going to that? I find it an interesting idea to chew on, as I feel siphoning off about half a billion to France is pre planned, workimg in cahoots ... but why not try to discuss how and why a persons country is fleeced of resources and / or destroyed by war, leaving people with perhaps no choice but to flee In the first place. I don't like the increase of left right etc labels, as real life is not like thar. It's all part of the indoctrination. Divide and argue while the roots are being deliberately destroyed. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Observations said: I find it an interesting idea to chew on, as I feel siphoning off about half a billion to France is pre planned the reality is that we voted for brexit to have our borders restored The mass influx of migrants would then be the problem of the EU countries to deal with and the punishment they would receive for having placed themselves in a corporate socialist superstate that wants to destroy them as countries. That is the CONSEQUENCE of choosing to be in a globalist run superstate. except our country didn't leave the EU because the politicians wanted to leave. We left because the people wanted to leave. So the politicians have just carried on behaving as if they are still in the EU and are accepting their EU 'quotas' of migrants and now the british politicians are looking for ways to continue handing over our taxpayers money to the EU even though we have left which is what sunak is now doing So on the surface we appear to have left the EU but in reality we are still behaving as if we are in it which is to say: -taking never ending flows of migrants from the EU -shelling out vast sums of taxpayers money to the EU In effect the UK politicians who are really globalist sell-outs are saying to the british public ''well you might have voted for brexit to try and save britain from destruction within the EU but we are just going to use other methods to destroy britain instead so fuck you'' Edited March 11 by Macnamara 3 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sit down, Waldo Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 1 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truther79 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 The majority of these pundits have dined off their on-field accomplishments for long enough. It's turning more into a pantomime every week. Especially on Sky. The Scouser Vs The Manc angle, the laughing clown in the corner (Micah Richards)...all of whom can't cut it tactically and can't/wouldn't last 5 minutes in management. Very few genuinely good presenters/pundits around these days. Just muppets being controversial for likes and clicks off the plebs at home. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captainlove Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Gary lineker is a nothing. He didnt win anything in his career so i guess he has nothing else to do other than cry. Most people cant stand him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campion Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 (edited) Such a trivial use of the word Nazi is really a form of hate speech, and people on the right wing politically have been prosecuted and spent jail time for hate crimes. Yes free speech is under attack on all sides, but more so on some sides than others. And I do wonder if the timing of this Nazi debate is a coincidence, when there's the continuing campaign for a holocaust memorial in the heart of London. Even though Britain was the enemy of the Nazis and helped bring an end to the holocaust, the agitators behind all this want to create the impression that fascism, genocidal racism and imperialism are waiting just below the surface in western civilisation, and need the full force of the communist antithesis to prevent another genocide. We are given mass immigration to dilute our culture, we are made to feel guilty and privileged and in need of re-education away from ethnic nationalism (aka "Nazism") and towards a globalised de-nationalised, de-tribed, multicultural melting pot. Edited March 11 by Campion 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campion Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 11 minutes ago, Campion said: the agitators behind all this want to create the impression that fascism, genocidal racism and imperialism are waiting just below the surface in western civilisation, and need the full force of the communist antithesis It's quite a turnaround. From the end of WW2 up to the 1980s it was the red menace that fuelled the cold war, and our need to join the US led alliance against communism. That we have been led through such a u-turn without batting an eyelid in terms of our political landscape is remarkable. We've still got the same political parties ruling over us but it is they who have shifted from right to left, not those of us who see ourselves as regular, moderate members of our communities and our nations. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
factJack Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 I prefer to watch the action instead of listening to these idiots talk. I'm looking forward to match of the day tonight without the stupid pundits and commentators. 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artie Fufkin Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 6 hours ago, Macnamara said: the reality is that we voted for brexit to have our borders restored The mass influx of migrants would then be the problem of the EU countries to deal with and the punishment they would receive for having placed themselves in a corporate socialist superstate that wants to destroy them as countries. That is the CONSEQUENCE of choosing to be in a globalist run superstate. except our country didn't leave the EU because the politicians wanted to leave. We left because the people wanted to leave. So the politicians have just carried on behaving as if they are still in the EU and are accepting their EU 'quotas' of migrants and now the british politicians are looking for ways to continue handing over our taxpayers money to the EU even though we have left which is what sunak is now doing So on the surface we appear to have left the EU but in reality we are still behaving as if we are in it which is to say: -taking never ending flows of migrants from the EU -shelling out vast sums of taxpayers money to the EU In effect the UK politicians who are really globalist sell-outs are saying to the british public ''well you might have voted for brexit to try and save britain from destruction within the EU but we are just going to use other methods to destroy britain instead so fuck you'' Within a few months of voting for Brexit i had a realisation that the nations' vote would change nothing, I'm still waiting to be corrected, but my patience to be proved otherwise is still alive! Regarding the Lineker debacle, it appears that Gary has been following a script and pushing said views via social media platforms. 'Football Focus' and 'Final Score' have been cancelled today due to solidarity with 'brother' Lineker after being suspended on full pay for expressing partisan views whilst 'working' for a public funded (supposidly) non-political national broacasting corporation I'm inclinded to believe that this could be a catalyst for the removal of football from free to air television at the very least. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 I'm pretty sure it is all indeed a 'massive distraction'. Gary Lineker is an overpaid tool, he's been spouting his biased 'opinions' on Twitter for years, yet only now what he has said is a 'problem'? The BBC has always been a 'government mouthpiece', it is a state-funded 'public broadcaster', just like RT is in Russia. Gary Lineker may criticise the UK Government, but this Conservative party currently in power is just as 'left-leaning' as he is, they merely 'pretend' to be right-wing. This is all part of the 'social engineering' project to manipulate people into voting against the Tories at the next election, which will see Labour take power: 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velma Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Little Rishi needed a ‘crisis’ to prove he is at the helm of this sinking ship, so they gave him ‘Small Boats’ suitable for a small insignificant man, emblazoned on his little lectern. It does not have the same ring as ‘Hands, Face, Space’ it should read: ‘Refugees, Rejected, Returned.’ It’s not a new problem, it has been occurring since the Tories took power, but they claim illegal immigrants head for the UK because we don’t have an ID system, which makes it easy to ‘disappear’ between the cracks and into the black economy. Bingo! Another reason to make it a requirement. Sunak and Braverman did not have that problem, their forebears went from British India to Kenya, to work on railways, housing and as merchants. They are currently the most successful group in South-East Africa. Their parents were not fleeing war, persecution, flood or famine when they came here in the 1950’s. The irony is, they are now our politicians, in a land to which they have no cultural or historical affinity, their allegiance is to the massacre at Amritsar not Hastings! Now, they wish to deny asylum to others, unless they come from Ukraine. We send buses for them. Lineker touched a nerve with his analogy on the rhetoric in Germany in the 1930’s, because the ‘writing was on the wall’ for European Jews, who fled to the USA and the UK, where they were welcomed, otherwise they would have been sent to Uganda by Hitler. Which coincidentally, is where they want to send migrants today. These Jews are called “holocaust survivors” because they got out in time. Their ‘trauma and suffering’ is passed onto successive generations and Suella Braverman, who married into it, indoctrinates her children with the same narrative. While, Rishi Sunak, Suella Braverman, Sadiq Khan, Humza Yousef, Anas Sarwar and other Shabbos Goy shout “ahoy!” the ship is steadily steered onto the rocks by the same ‘hidden hand’ that sailed the high-seas as the pirates of the East India Company. The merchants who monopolised all trade and commerce, whose most lucrative commodity at present is weapons, drugs, organ and sex trafficking. All conducted under the guise of wars, which create the refugee crisis. The ‘power behind the throne’ had a long-range plan, that was never in our interest, only for “the chosen.” 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spideysensei Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Get ready for leftists to cry wolf about freedom of speech, meanwhile accepting of state/big tech apparatus to continue to shut down anything they don't agree with. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northern star Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 On 3/11/2023 at 1:24 PM, Observations said: ... but why not try to discuss how and why a persons country is fleeced of resources and / or destroyed by war, leaving people with perhaps no choice but to flee In the first place. That's the real issue. No-one seems to be addressing the real root of the problem. The same applies to those crossing the US border. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Graham Mack former BBC broadcaster and voice artist All quotes from talk radio at 13:30 - 13:50 today .... Is the BBC scared of the government? Why are we focusing on Lineker ? Is it to do with how much he is paid. Or is it that they want to get rid of him anyway. When they get rid of you it's never for the reason thry say. Maybe they were just waiting for him to slip up. Budgets are budgets. They might have to pay him off either way. We have a word for people who don't have an option on anything. Bland. You'd rather spend time with people you disagree with ... Someone displays something human that will connect him to the audience ... When I worked in Swimdon there was a hose pipe ban, and I found put that Thames Water were leaking enough water to fill a stadium every 48 hours. I knew I veiling say it on the show, but I wrote it on my blog, and all hell broke lose, all of a sudden it went to the top man in Bristol. Trisha. Others have been outspoken in the past ( without a big fuss ) Alan Sugar put a picture of Hitler next to Jeremy Corbyn Caller; " Alan Sugar is a Jew. " " One of your presenters lost his job when he asked people to vote for Boris " " I think this is covering something up " Trisha; Our first guest the lawyer asked " What is behind this ? " Caller continues; " Months ago they used to produce statistics on the deaths, vaccinated and unvaccinated, and they've been removed now, excess deaths, but hey I'm not a conspiracy theorist " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 (edited) Trisha Goddard read a quote from Joan Salter. I looked her up ... https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/voice-of-the-jn-joans-right-this-country-is-not-a-chuppah-for-refugees/ Holocaust survivor Joan Salter took the home secretary to task for all of us... but our history of taking refugees is still rose-tinted. By VOICE OF THE JEWISH NEWS January 17, 2023 It speaks volumes that a Jewish Holocaust survivor was the one to challenge anti-immigrant Home Secretary Suella Braverman on her use of words like “invasion” on Friday. It speaks further volumes that, by Tuesday morning, it had been viewed more than five million times. Joan Salter, who was awarded an MBE for her work on Holocaust education, told Braverman that using words like “invasion” and “swarm” reminded her of the kind of language used by pre-war Nazis to demonise Jews. She then asked the pertinent question: why does she feel the need to use words like that in the first place? Edited March 12 by Observations Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 On 3/11/2023 at 12:24 PM, Not Thoth said: I reckon Lineker should stick to nicking crisps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 (edited) ha! I laughed out loud at this bit: ''I’m sorry, I tried to ‘steel man’ their position, but I am struggling to put myself in the mindset of anyone this thick or disingenuous (it’s never quite clear which it is).'' I find myself wondering the same when i clash with lefties.....are they really THAT disingenuous that they can be overtly hypocritical without a hint of shame? YES as their whole schtick is ''the end justify the means'' The Absurd Celebrity Meltdown Over Gary Lineker by Nick Dixon 11 March 2023 2:50 PM https://dailysceptic.org/2023/03/11/the-absurd-celebrity-meltdown-over-gary-lineker/ Edited March 12 by Macnamara 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemuri Kyoshiro Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 I still remember that advert with Lineker and Savile, Shipman, Sutcliffe, et al. That's been scrubbed from the web. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 4 hours ago, Observations said: Joan Salter, who was awarded an MBE for her work on Holocaust education, told Braverman that using words like “invasion” and “swarm” reminded her of the kind of language used by pre-war Nazis to demonise Jews. She then asked the pertinent question: why does she feel the need to use words like that in the first place? Because that is exactly what is happening! There is a slow invasion taking place on the south-east coast, with thousands of fighting age men (very few in the way of women or children) swarming across France and the rest of Europe, and NOBODY has any real desire to stop this happening, in fact there are groups facilitating this, and our own government is being far too soft by letting them in and putting them up in fancy hotels. Yes, the language used might 'remind' her of pre-war Nazis, but the situation is completely different. And that is the same mistake that Mr Lineker made. Genuine refugees and asylum-seekers would have found refuge or sought asylum in the first 'safe' country that they came to. Why travel across Europe - via a multitude of 'safe' countries - unless you're an 'economic migrant'? Also it was reported earlier this year that the majority of people arriving on boats from across the Channel were actually Albanians, from a country that is NOT a war-zone. I don't like using these labels as such, but the 'woke leftists' are just doing what Orwell described in '1984' with regards to 'newspeak', alter the language, make people think about what they are saying, and word it in a way so as not to 'offend' people. In the same way that they're trying to remove the words "illegal immigrant" from the vocabulary, to be replaced with some nonsense term like "displaced person". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.