Anyone Else Think That Low-Quality JOURNALISM Has Become The ACHILLES HEEL Of The Globalists?

[Truthblast]

The Globalists have made many mistakes on the road to their stupid "Agenda 2030".

 

1) They furiously threw their occult numbers and symbols around like nobody would notice

2) They forced WOKE/we-are-all-LGBT-now crap on panicked people in the middle of a pandemic

3) They tried to scare people with "moooslim terrorists" who apparently want to kill everybody they see

4) They made us watch while millions of innocents perished in their stupid geopolitical hegemony wars in the ME

5) They censored the FUCK out of what was supposed to be OUR Internet - WE are footing the bill for the Internet

6) They turned innocent youths into depressed Social Media crack addicts

7) They stole people's privacy and private data like they were sucking crude oil out of a well

8) They used incompetent frontmen and women who sound like idiots to anyone who has an undergraduate degree in anything

9) They went BATSHIT CRAZY with a bunch of no good dimwits in DAVOS telling us that God doesn't exist and that we have to eat mealworms and crickets from now on because THEY say so

10) They violated INTERNATIONAL LAW and INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES over and over and over again

11) I won't even get into their recent UFOs/UAPs "we simply don't know what our cockpit cameras are picking up" stupidities

 

But I think that their real Achilles hell is the shit quality of today's news reporting and "journalism":

 

1) Today's journalists come across as ignorant and uninformed

2) They swoon over obvious frontment like Gates and Musk

3) They don't report or investigate anything that is in the public interest

4) Everybody is a "Conspiracy Theorist" to these screen-blocking turds

5) They have no problem lying about the fact that they know exactly and in great detail what is really going on in the world

6) They have the actual nerve to call what they are doing "news journalism" - Ha ha ha, yes, and I'm Santa Claus!

 

 

I think the gaping hole they left in news journalism the World over has become the Achilles heel of their entire plan.

 

 

You see, if you cannot report honestly what is happening in the world then YOU are probably who is doing all this to the world in the first place.

 

I honestly don'r see how news journalism will ever escape the death-spiral these idiots forced it into.

 

 

After 2 consecutive decades of failing to report anything properly, who in their right mind will ever believe news outlets ranging from the New York Times to the Economist to the Guardian ever again?

 

 

I think that THIS is where Agenda 2030 BREAKS completely.

 

 

If you give us shit quality news and journalism then why the hell should we follow YOU into a future of YOUR design?

 

Why should we follow PATHOLOGICAL LIARS into any kind of future?

 

 

[Grumpy Owl]

2 hours ago, Truthblast said:

But I think that their real Achilles hell is the shit quality of today's news reporting and "journalism":

 

1) Today's journalists come across as ignorant and uninformed

2) They swoon over obvious frontment like Gates and Musk

3) They don't report or investigate anything that is in the public interest

4) Everybody is a "Conspiracy Theorist" to these screen-blocking turds

5) They have no problem lying about the fact that they know exactly and in great detail what is really going on in the world

6) They have the actual nerve to call what they are doing "news journalism" - Ha ha ha, yes, and I'm Santa Claus!

 

I tend to agree with you, the problem with most internet news websites now is that they are just chasing clicks for ad revenue.

 

I wrote a couple of articles on my website last year with my thoughts:

Media is just the bits in between the adverts

https://thegrumpyowl.co.uk/2022/07/24/media-is-just-the-bits-in-between-the-adverts/

 

The Decline Of Local Journalism (or “How To Be A Reach Journalist”)

https://thegrumpyowl.co.uk/2022/07/31/the-decline-of-local-journalism-or-how-to-be-a-reach-journalist/

 

 

Those are both from over six months ago, and it would seem to me that the standards of journalism are getting even more worse.

 

Even the BBC - though it does not carry advertising on its news website (not in the UK at least) - is becoming more like a typical Reach site, with 'click-baity' headlines.

 

They all just 'parrot' from each other. And as we saw recently with the Nicola Bulley 'case', the lack of detail and investigative reporting just leads the reader to start 'speculating', due to all the unanswered questions, and I think sometimes this is all intentional.

 

The clue is always to look at the news stories where comments are actually allowed and haven't been 'turned off'.

[Grumpy Owl]

Just to add to the above, yes, I do think that most 'local journalists' are nothing more than 'bloggers', based on some recent examples I've seen on my local Birmingham Mail 'news' site.

 

I tried Primark and Marks & Spencer gym wear - and one wasn't even fit for a work-out

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/whats-on/reviews/tried-primark-marks-spencer-gym-26358202

 

I tried washing powder from Tesco, Aldi, Sainsbury's and Asda and one made my house smell like a perfume shop

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/whats-on/reviews/tried-washing-powder-tesco-aldi-26380905

 

I mean, is this really 'news'? Or just 'distraction fodder'?

 

 

Edited March 10 by Grumpy Owl

[k_j_evans]

We get some entertaining and almost useful ones, like "When will it snow again?" and "Can you spot the location in the latest Vera episode?" But today's Breaking news is ...  New yellow weather warning issued after Storm Larisa brings snow - duh, I have a window!

and Newcastle consultant warns smoking kills brains cells and could see people in 40s and 50s get dementia later in life - hmm, how many get dementia later in life anyway, whether they smoke or not?

[JCP]

To me, the biggest clue that the news is a lie is when they invite an "expert" on, and it is obvious that they are reading from a prompter. Why would anyone listen to these people that can't even bring their own opinion to the show and have to read from a script? Who's words are we hearing? Who wrote the script?

 

If you haven't noticed if for yourself ........ just watch their eyes. Some of the "experts" are pretty good at hiding that they are reading from a script, while others are just really poor actors.

 

 

[alexa]

On 3/10/2023 at 5:18 PM, Truthblast said:

The Globalists have made many mistakes on the road to their stupid "Agenda 2030".

 

1) They furiously threw their occult numbers and symbols around like nobody would notice

2) They forced WOKE/we-are-all-LGBT-now crap on panicked people in the middle of a pandemic

3) They tried to scare people with "moooslim terrorists" who apparently want to kill everybody they see

4) They made us watch while millions of innocents perished in their stupid geopolitical hegemony wars in the ME

5) They censored the FUCK out of what was supposed to be OUR Internet - WE are footing the bill for the Internet

6) They turned innocent youths into depressed Social Media crack addicts

7) They stole people's privacy and private data like they were sucking crude oil out of a well

8) They used incompetent frontmen and women who sound like idiots to anyone who has an undergraduate degree in anything

9) They went BATSHIT CRAZY with a bunch of no good dimwits in DAVOS telling us that God doesn't exist and that we have to eat mealworms and crickets from now on because THEY say so

10) They violated INTERNATIONAL LAW and INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES over and over and over again

11) I won't even get into their recent UFOs/UAPs "we simply don't know what our cockpit cameras are picking up" stupidities

 

But I think that their real Achilles hell is the shit quality of today's news reporting and "journalism":

 

1) Today's journalists come across as ignorant and uninformed

2) They swoon over obvious frontment like Gates and Musk

3) They don't report or investigate anything that is in the public interest

4) Everybody is a "Conspiracy Theorist" to these screen-blocking turds

5) They have no problem lying about the fact that they know exactly and in great detail what is really going on in the world

6) They have the actual nerve to call what they are doing "news journalism" - Ha ha ha, yes, and I'm Santa Claus!

 

 

I think the gaping hole they left in news journalism the World over has become the Achilles heel of their entire plan.

 

 

You see, if you cannot report honestly what is happening in the world then YOU are probably who is doing all this to the world in the first place.

 

I honestly don'r see how news journalism will ever escape the death-spiral these idiots forced it into.

 

 

After 2 consecutive decades of failing to report anything properly, who in their right mind will ever believe news outlets ranging from the New York Times to the Economist to the Guardian ever again?

 

 

I think that THIS is where Agenda 2030 BREAKS completely.

 

 

If you give us shit quality news and journalism then why the hell should we follow YOU into a future of YOUR design?

 

Why should we follow PATHOLOGICAL LIARS into any kind of future?

 

 

 

What a great post Truthblast & I agree with every word you've written - Thanks 

[Truthblast]

On 3/10/2023 at 10:53 PM, Grumpy Owl said:

 

I tend to agree with you, the problem with most internet news websites now is that they are just chasing clicks for ad revenue.

 

I wrote a couple of articles on my website last year with my thoughts:

Media is just the bits in between the adverts

https://thegrumpyowl.co.uk/2022/07/24/media-is-just-the-bits-in-between-the-adverts/

 

The Decline Of Local Journalism (or “How To Be A Reach Journalist”)

https://thegrumpyowl.co.uk/2022/07/31/the-decline-of-local-journalism-or-how-to-be-a-reach-journalist/

 

 

Those are both from over six months ago, and it would seem to me that the standards of journalism are getting even more worse.

 

Even the BBC - though it does not carry advertising on its news website (not in the UK at least) - is becoming more like a typical Reach site, with 'click-baity' headlines.

 

They all just 'parrot' from each other. And as we saw recently with the Nicola Bulley 'case', the lack of detail and investigative reporting just leads the reader to start 'speculating', due to all the unanswered questions, and I think sometimes this is all intentional.

 

The clue is always to look at the news stories where comments are actually allowed and haven't been 'turned off'.

 

A lot of news outlets worldwide seem to be just going through the motions of news reporting.

 

It looks and sounds like news.

 

But they are not really reporting what they know.

 

Jusy some airy fairy little summary of what happened.

 

And then they usually let the story go and nothing further is investigated.

[Dagon44]

On 3/10/2023 at 8:15 PM, Grumpy Owl said:

Just to add to the above, yes, I do think that most 'local journalists' are nothing more than 'bloggers', based on some recent examples I've seen on my local Birmingham Mail 'news' site.

 

I tried Primark and Marks & Spencer gym wear - and one wasn't even fit for a work-out

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/whats-on/reviews/tried-primark-marks-spencer-gym-26358202

 

I tried washing powder from Tesco, Aldi, Sainsbury's and Asda and one made my house smell like a perfume shop

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/whats-on/reviews/tried-washing-powder-tesco-aldi-26380905

 

I mean, is this really 'news'? Or just 'distraction fodder'?

 

 

It’s just fascism news can now only be linked to a product

[Morpheus]

Anyone Else Think That Low-Quality JOURNALISM Has Become The ACHILLES HEEL Of The Globalists?

 

No, because they have data analytics and they know exactly which buttons to press and when to ease off. 

Edited March 12 by Morpheus

[Grumpy Owl]

6 hours ago, Truthblast said:

 

A lot of news outlets worldwide seem to be just going through the motions of news reporting.

 

It looks and sounds like news.

 

But they are not really reporting what they know.

 

Jusy some airy fairy little summary of what happened.

 

And then they usually let the story go and nothing further is investigated.

 

"Everything we know so far about..."

 

As other people have pointed out before, they are not 'reporting' on the news, they are just 'repeating' what other people have already said.

 

Repeaters, not reporters.

 

Most 'local' news stories now are just 'embellishments' on what the local police/fire/ambulance services are already posting on Twitter.

 

The 'national' newspapers mostly carry the same headline stories, and usually just parrot each other.