Jump to content

The criminal element hates a one world governance; that makes me for it. What do you think?


Recommended Posts

The criminal element hates a one world governance; that makes me for it.  What do you think?

 

Given my old criminal mind and delinquent attitude; I know that if I was my old self, I would hate the notion of a one world government.

 

Such a bank would prevent me from talking advantage of the white economy.

 

Fair taxation makes my criminal wallet lose twofold. I lose my gain and now must pay fair.

 

Given my reform and apotheosis, I feel it is my duty to tell all my fellow white economy taxpayers, we all pay taxes, and it is foolish not to have a fair system.

 

Leaving unfair advantage to the black market does not seem like a good idea.

 

I think I would vote for a One World Government, just to get the One World Bank.

 

If your government preaches against a One World Government, they are voting with the criminals who hate the idea.

 

Economically speaking; given that single source banking governance is easy, --- I think that moving a huge economic advantage from the black market to our white market, --- is a good idea.

 

You?

 

Regards.

DL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 9:15 PM, Gnostic Christian said:

The criminal element hates a one world governance; that makes me for it.  What do you think?

 

Mankind is born free, so get over it and grow up, pointing fingers is rude you know, blame game for not taking responsibility for your actions and want to deflect away from yourself, much like what the evil bastards do currently of whom will automatically acquiesce to such positions of kcontrol.

 

On 3/1/2023 at 9:15 PM, Gnostic Christian said:

Given my old criminal mind and delinquent attitude; I know that if I was my old self, I would hate the notion of a one world government.

 

That is the beauty of freedom, you were given a chance to change and not have it hammered into you, you changed because there is something good in you that was being suppressed, all of which stems with government as it is currently set up, divide and rule by all means at it's disposal and it don't care for the harm it does except for the kontrol it acquires.

 

On 3/1/2023 at 9:15 PM, Gnostic Christian said:

Such a bank would prevent me from talking advantage of the white economy.

 

Fair taxation makes my criminal wallet lose twofold. I lose my gain and now must pay fair.

 

I'm not sure about the first sentence you wrote there i suspect a typo of some sort, but the second sentence is where it needs to change for good, there is no such thing as fair taxation, it's how government has acquired it's power, the taxation of a living soul has to stop and must be punishable by death, and publicly for those that wish to impose it, it is immoral unlawful illegal and unjust, it places a burden on a living soul as nothing more than a slave from birth and no one on this Earth has a right to do it, to do so is to view a living soul as scum to be used and abused, of course the bollocticians will argue over it all day long because that is their grift making you feel that they are 'on your side' and oh how the economy will be so much better for everyone if you vote for the latest round of tax improvements, but that's the con keeping you blind by engaging in something that should not be, ever.

 

On 3/1/2023 at 9:15 PM, Gnostic Christian said:

Given my reform and apotheosis, I feel it is my duty to tell all my fellow white economy taxpayers, we all pay taxes, and it is foolish not to have a fair system.

 

The only fair Lawful way is to remove taxes from living souls, forever.

 

On 3/1/2023 at 9:15 PM, Gnostic Christian said:

Leaving unfair advantage to the black market does not seem like a good idea.

 

There will not be a black market in a just Lawful way.

 

On 3/1/2023 at 9:15 PM, Gnostic Christian said:

I think I would vote for a One World Government, just to get the One World Bank.

 

You have come so far and yet you wish to trample upon pearls, don't think ever, you are so worthless, and don't think ever that someone else will have your best interest at heart, they don't, they only have theirs at your expense.

 

On 3/1/2023 at 9:15 PM, Gnostic Christian said:

If your government preaches against a One World Government, they are voting with the criminals who hate the idea.

 

If government is preaching then your are listening to the wrong words, government has no place or right to preach anything at all, stop listening to the good for nothing lazy fukwit babbling nonce cases and take back your life, even if it kills you, not everyone is bad, so why give that precious moment over to corruption, do you not want to view your life as what you made it to be, do you really want to go to hell on someone else's terms, GTFO!

 

On 3/1/2023 at 9:15 PM, Gnostic Christian said:

Economically speaking; given that single source banking governance is easy, --- I think that moving a huge economic advantage from the black market to our white market, --- is a good idea.

 

This economy that you speak of, is it just numbers on luncheon vouchers, or is it you and what you do, as i stated above government is nothing more than a deception in it's current form, so stop listening to the compulsive lying decievers and take back your life from people that have no business in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 9:15 PM, Gnostic Christian said:

If your government preaches against a One World Government, they are voting with the criminals who hate the idea.

 

Economically speaking; given that single source banking governance is easy, --- I think that moving a huge economic advantage from the black market to our white market, --- is a good idea.

 

Policing the world against criminals, terrorists, failed states etc is precisely how they justify the central technological control over us all, surveillance cameras everywhere, microchips, AI, DNA profiling etc etc. And to a certain extent there's a logic to it, we need protecting from criminals. However, who protects us from the police if they have bad intent towards us? Would you actually trust someone who wants to have that much control globally? It's pretty clear to me that the bigger the political system, the less democratic it is to the ordinary people in their local communities. 

 

So I'd say this is an issue for a compromise between freedom and security. These are two poles of the spectrum. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gnostic Christian said:

That is to all the various nations to deal with in their own way.

 

I totally agree, but that needs nations to have sovereignty. Which doesn't sound compatible with a one world government to me.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Campion said:

 

I totally agree, but that needs nations to have sovereignty. Which doesn't sound compatible with a one world government to me.  

Correct.

 

We are to set that aside and not use it till we decide, if we ever do, to opt out of the association world bank association.

 

The bank want your wealth, not your sovereignty.

 

Regards

DL

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2023 at 9:15 PM, Gnostic Christian said:

The criminal element hates a one world governance; that makes me for it.  What do you think?

 

Given my old criminal mind and delinquent attitude; I know that if I was my old self, I would hate the notion of a one world government.

 

Such a bank would prevent me from talking advantage of the white economy.

 

Fair taxation makes my criminal wallet lose twofold. I lose my gain and now must pay fair.

 

Given my reform and apotheosis, I feel it is my duty to tell all my fellow white economy taxpayers, we all pay taxes, and it is foolish not to have a fair system.

 

Leaving unfair advantage to the black market does not seem like a good idea.

 

I think I would vote for a One World Government, just to get the One World Bank.

 

If your government preaches against a One World Government, they are voting with the criminals who hate the idea.

 

Economically speaking; given that single source banking governance is easy, --- I think that moving a huge economic advantage from the black market to our white market, --- is a good idea.

 

You?

 

Regards.

DL

 

What it needs is transparency, people need to know the truth. There needs to be regulations, the problem is with capitalism the business model is cheap as possible, penny pinching but we are all pinched out now. 

 

Just look at new build standards for sound insulation, as an example there is none. They aren't bothered about quality of life upgrades for people, improving food standards, educating people on health and nutrition. 

 

There needs some kind of peacekeepers, a body which regulates everything improving standards so that capitalistic greed doesn't engulf humanity. Something ran entirely by the people to keep things in check, but without transparency and the truth it's pointless.

 

The only reason people are oblivious and they are able to do all these wars, crisis, conspiracies, is because they fill their heads full of garbage and rainbows. If people knew the truth I'll bet they wouldn't be so bothered about changing their genitalia and demanding people take notice of them. They put us into boxes and now there is no society, its all online. We have to do something about it, but they made it pretty much impossible

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Gnostic Christian said:

Thanks for this.

 

I do not like the death penalty for any living soul.

 

I also want my fellow tax payers to get a nice 30% raise.

 

Especially those with children can use it.

 

Regards

DL

 

I don't either, i wish everyone that comes into this life to be mindful and respectful that do not trespass nor transgress, in this perfect world there would be little to actually have the death penalty for, but we have to be realistic that the world is far from perfect in the first place, and Nature itself will do you in if you're not careful, so i am firmly of the opinion that there are some outrages that are enacted by the transgressors that are so awful that only the death penalty is fit for the crime committed, convid is just one example, crimes against children another, 👍

Edited by sock muppet
typo
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sanityisgone said:

What it needs is transparency, people need to know the truth. There needs to be regulations, the problem is with capitalism the business model is cheap as possible, penny pinching but we are all pinched out now.

 

The problem with capitalism is not capitalism but in fact the Law turning a willful blind eye to the unfettered robbery that transpired, too big to fail being the classic excuse for it in terms of words, and it's not transparency that is needed, it is in fact open honesty that is needed, transparency is just another way of saying hidden in plain sight because you can not 'see' anything that is transparent, all though the compulsive lying deception going on is not hard to see through for the truth to emerge..

 

5 hours ago, Campion said:

Policing the world against criminals

 

That would be government itself, as far as i am concerned those scoundrels have stolen our rights and threw them in the bin as though it were a trivial matter, and as for terrorism that is directly sponsored by the bastards in government to acquire ever more powers to screw you with, if one good thing came out of convid it is to show the 99% just who the real criminal terrorists are and you will find them in OUR Parliament sponsored by, evil bastard inc, pfizer and co.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sock muppet said:

 

The problem with capitalism is not capitalism but in fact the Law turning a willful blind eye to the unfettered robbery that transpired, too big to fail being the classic excuse for it in terms of words, and it's not transparency that is needed, it is in fact open honesty that is needed, transparency is just another way of saying hidden in plain sight because you can not 'see' anything that is transparent, all though the compulsive lying deception going on is not hard to see through for the truth to emerge..

 

 

That would be government itself, as far as i am concerned those scoundrels have stolen our rights and threw them in the bin as though it were a trivial matter, and as for terrorism that is directly sponsored by the bastards in government to acquire ever more powers to screw you with, if one good thing came out of convid it is to show the 99% just who the real criminal terrorists are and you will find them in OUR Parliament sponsored by, evil bastard inc, pfizer and co.

 

That's what I just said, think you don't know the meaning of transparency in that context. Doesn't matter who's robbing who, capitalism doesn't work, living off debt and throwaway rubbish from China doesn't work. The system always need to spend more money or resources that it can pull, it's a never ending cycle of follow the leader

 

We need drastic change. Even if we overthrew the system, still got a hell of a long way to go, to organise the future. It's never going to happen, it goes the old saying you're only as strong as your weakest link, and they just keep making more bullet holes. Only one direction were headed.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Sanityisgone said:

capitalism doesn't work

 

There is nothing wrong with capitalism, it is just a method of ease of exchange of goods and services and accountability, beats carrying around a bag of chickens to barter with anyway, and who is it that the communist the socialist the fascist and the despotic nut jobs go and talk to for their idiotic systems of nonsense to work in the first place, the capitalist.

What has been done by successive governments on planet stupid is they have systematically robbed all the wealth for themselves and left us with the bill, so if you want to get things right then a damn good clear out is needed from all of the instruments currently being weaponised against, we the people, all we need to do is stand for the Law to be applied, and when found guilty off to the gallows you go and good riddance, you will soon see a difference in the quality and expectation in life overnight, when responsibility is reintroduced back into the minds of above the law types.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

There is nothing wrong with capitalism

 

I think peoples' perception of capitalism is determined by each individuals experience with it. Most people from the lower - middle class on up might not see a problem with this system; whereas people in a lower economic strata might look at it with a wider lens and see things differently. They are hit with the very real understanding that if they don't have money and cannot generate an income ..... they die.

 

To me, the obvious tell-tail sign that capitalism is a sham is that it's a debt based system (slavery) and there isn't enough money in the world to pay off all of the debt. How can a system like that even work? It requires debt to sustain itself. It is as fraudulent and unsustainable as a pyramid scheme.

 

Proposes little or no solution to persistent poverty

Generates a growing level of income inequality

Fails to pay a living wage to billions of workers

Not enough human jobs in the face of growing automation

Doesn’t charge businesses with the full social costs of their activities

Exploits the environment and natural resources in the absence of regulation

Creates business cyclical booms and busts ........ creates economic instability

Emphasizes individualism and self-interest at the expense of community and the commons

Encourages high consumer debt and leads to a growing financially-driven rather than producer-driven economy

Lets politicians and business interests collaborate to subvert the economic interests of the majority of citizens

Favors short-run profit planning over long-run investment planning

Should have regulations regarding product quality, safety, truth in advertising, and anti-competitive behavior

Tends to focus narrowly on GDP growth. Capitalism requires constant high growth

Doesn't bring social values and happiness into the market equation.

 

Not only does capitalism promote inequality, it promotes consumerism, commoditization, monopolies, monopsony, anti-competitive practices, rent seeking, and crony capitalism. It is their system that they use against us and to their advantage.

It is no surprise that the major banks are the shareholders of the central banks around the world.

The banks control the money, and the world. They own us and they've done it thru capitalism and legal theft.

 

Pin on misc

 

yogatrader: American Dream

 

Henry A. Kissinger quote: Who controls the food supply controls the ...

 

What GC describes here is a result of capitalism

Alas, it's all for not, because it appears that capitalism is in it's last throws and a new system will be installed that has much more control over our lives ................ And We Will Be Happy

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JCP said:

To me, the obvious tell-tail sign that capitalism is a sham is that it's a debt based system (slavery) and there isn't enough money in the world to pay off all of the debt. How can a system like that even work? It requires debt to sustain itself. It is as fraudulent and unsustainable as a pyramid scheme.

 

Perfectly describing everything that capitalism is not, what we are discussing is the elephant in the room that the economy has been weaponised, economic warfare, and that is not capitalism.

 

1 hour ago, JCP said:

Proposes little or no solution to persistent poverty

Generates a growing level of income inequality

Fails to pay a living wage to billions of workers

Not enough human jobs in the face of growing automation

Doesn’t charge businesses with the full social costs of their activities

Exploits the environment and natural resources in the absence of regulation

Creates business cyclical booms and busts ........ creates economic instability

Emphasizes individualism and self-interest at the expense of community and the commons

Encourages high consumer debt and leads to a growing financially-driven rather than producer-driven economy

Lets politicians and business interests collaborate to subvert the economic interests of the majority of citizens

Favors short-run profit planning over long-run investment planning

Should have regulations regarding product quality, safety, truth in advertising, and anti-competitive behavior

Tends to focus narrowly on GDP growth. Capitalism requires constant high growth

Doesn't bring social values and happiness into the market equation.

 

Perfect demonstration of all that is not capitalism.

 

1 hour ago, JCP said:

Not only does capitalism promote inequality, it promotes consumerism, commoditization, monopolies, monopsony, anti-competitive practices, rent seeking, and crony capitalism. It is their system that they use against us and to their advantage.

It is no surprise that the major banks are the shareholders of the central banks around the world.

The banks control the money, and the world. They own us and they've done it thru capitalism and legal theft.

 

And here is the elephant in the room, now you have already given us the usual suspects line up, and it has been corrupted by those who stole the power in the first place, to ensure the survival of their own species at the expense of everyone else on planet stupid, it is the Law itself that is at fault by willfully turning the blind eye to such matters to those that think they are above it because they are all on the payroll, nice bunch of fukin cunts are they not?

Once again, capitalism is a better way than bartering, which is the only true capitalistic method of exchange, but fuked if i'm to carry a bag of chickens around, to pay for a cup of tea and a cheese sandwich, how about you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Gnostic Christian said:

The bank want your wealth, not your sovereignty.

 

How would that work though? If I have no wealth, no savings, no property or investments, own nothing, then I'm living hand to mouth, renting everything and dependent on corporations for my whole existence. Similarly for the whole country. That's not the type of sovereignty I want. 

 

 

11 hours ago, sock muppet said:

Once again, capitalism is a better way than bartering, which is the only true capitalistic method of exchange, but fuked if i'm to carry a bag of chickens around, to pay for a cup of tea and a cheese sandwich, how about you?

 

What do you think about going back to the gold standard? That way, banks and governments can't just conjure up money on their computer screens, tho I'm not sure if there's enough gold to go round these days! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Sanityisgone said:

we are all pinched out now. 

 

 

23 hours ago, Sanityisgone said:

We have to do something about it, but they made it pretty much impossible

 

Being pinched out is why I want a world bank to nail the black market and take away their huge tax advantage.

 

Nothing in nature is impossible, and a one world bank is inevitable, given that plans and infrastructure are already in place with their long term plans.

 

The sooner we get there, the faster the tax payer gets criminals off their backs, and end with all pulling their fair share.

 

Regards

DL

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, sock muppet said:

transgressors that are so awful

You want to kill evil, while not recognizing it's value in our dualistic reality.

 

We both want justice.

 

Who created those awful transgressors, --- if not society, --- and all who empowered and trained those transgressors?

 

I can kill Hitler, but justice would demand that I go and punish all from his parents to teachers etc. etc.

 

Hitler had no power on his own, and could be seen as just the end of a long list of people that should die with him, if we seek the best justice.

 

We do not show how we venerate human life by taking it.

 

Regards

DL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Gnostic Christian said:

You want to kill evil, while not recognizing it's value in our dualistic reality.

 

Nope evil must be brought to heal, it is a wild rabid monster, lawless and if you don't stand up against it you become evil, good men do nothing right?

Mankind is to live by the Law and enforce it, because Mankind, both Man and Woman are the avatars of the Laws of existence.

 

48 minutes ago, Gnostic Christian said:

Who created those awful transgressors, --- if not society, --- and all who empowered and trained those transgressors?

 

Cosmic war, pick a side.

 

51 minutes ago, Gnostic Christian said:

We do not show how we venerate human life by taking it.

 

We do not show how we venerate life by not defending, protecting and arresting those that would enslave it and have dominion over all of God's creation, Mankind is the last line of defense.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Campion said:

What do you think about going back to the gold standard? That way, banks and governments can't just conjure up money on their computer screens, tho I'm not sure if there's enough gold to go round these days!

 

As far as the question of precious metals are concerned or anything deemed to be scarce, precious and desirable that we can all agree on, then it is just a matter of setting a value to what there is, for example if the current supply of something that is used for the accounting process and for this argument i will use gold, then either the value of it or the quantity of it is adjusted, so for example, if the planet has one hundred billion people on it and there is only enough gold for one ounce per person for 50 billion people then the measure has to change to half an ounce per person, it's just hypothetical but you get the idea.

The other thing that is so important is oversight of open honest accounting that what ever body does the adjusting then there can be no possible way of scamming the system of accounting and if there ever was found to be some type of cheating going on then a good public execution will serve as a reminder that concentrates the mind away from nefarious acts.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

Nope evil must be brought to heal,

Made me laugh. Thanks.

 

It is quite hard to bring someone to heel when they are already dead and in hell.

 

Right?

 

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

Mankind is the last line of defense.

Yes, and you would kill some of our defences.

 

Regards

DL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gnostic Christian said:

It is quite hard to bring someone to heel when they are already dead and in hell.

 

Right?

 

Nope, rampaging across this Earth right now as we converse, open your eyes, we have just been through one of the most awful of periods in Mankind's history, the fight has just begun, and they will fail, it's written in a book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Campion said:
On 3/4/2023 at 12:19 PM, Gnostic Christian said:

The bank want your wealth, not your sovereignty.

 

How would that work though? If I have no wealth, no savings, no property or investments, own nothing, then I'm living hand to mouth, renting everything and dependent on corporations for my whole existence. Similarly for the whole country. That's not the type of sovereignty I want. 

It would work about exactly the way it is working now with most of us and our banks.

 

Mind you, it will allow the bank to pay us better dividends over time, as well as rid us of criminals and their tax advantage. 

 

I don't know what type of sovereignty you want, but taking a criminals hands off our wallets, ---- seems as a good thing for all of our sovereignties.

 

Right?

 

Regards

DL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Gnostic Christian said:

Yes, and you would kill some of our defences.

 

If you want to line up like the Circumcellions did then be my guest, personally i have more important things to do like protecting the good and living my life.

 

Quote from article, aka, the suicide squad.

'On occasion, members of this group assaulted Roman legionaries or armed travelers with simple wooden clubs to provoke them into attacking and martyring them.'

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sock muppet said:

 

Nope, rampaging across this Earth right now as we converse, open your eyes, we have just been through one of the most awful of periods in Mankind's history, the fight has just begun, and they will fail, it's written in a book.

I liked some of your word above, but now you are sounding stupid.

 

"most awful?

 

Not too accurate or bright that.

 

You aint seen nothing yet, --- if this world does not unite to take on climate catastrophes.

 

Regards

DL

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...