Jump to content

Royal Thread - All royal stories here please


jack121

Recommended Posts

On 12/5/2024 at 12:23 AM, northern star said:

Offally good! After the Princess of Wales' revelation that she's a fan of kidneys, a Michelin award-winning chef reveals how YOU should eat them

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-11780661/After-Kate-Middletons-revelation-likes-kidneys-chef-reveals-eat-them.html

 

 

67966103-11780661-image-a-93_16770830923

 

Personally, I find that pic quite terrifying. 😀

 

 

 

On 11/2/2024 at 9:35 PM, Grumpy Grapes said:

Damning research, but we must remember that it's all part of the undermining of national institutions as we move towards a world government.

 

Exactly, but don't forget that Prince William is a willing accomplice to this. Maybe things have changed now, for whatever reason, but Prince/King Charles was not. This is also why Prince Andrew is being cast aside. He still believes in the monarchy as an institution and the PTB don't want to him to be seen as a viable successor. This would be after Prince William either refuses to become monarch or becomes monarch and abdicates within weeks/months. The PTB want King Charles III to essentially be the last monarch of the U.K.. The same casting aside has happened with Prince Harry as well, for the same reason. Megan is a PTB asset.  

 

 

 

On 12/25/2024 at 12:27 AM, lobster said:

You last point was rather my point, my quote above I queried, was they hadn't released the client list, thats different than the flight logs and as you correctly point out they haven't officially released those as they are undoubtedly covering up for someone or possibly lots of someones.

 

For sure. There are bound to be plenty of folks that visited Epstein's island, who we are unaware of.

 

Edited by numnuts
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, numnuts said:

 

Personally, I find that pic quite terrifying. 😀

 

 

 

 

Exactly, but don't forget that Prince William is a willing accomplice to this. Maybe things have changed now, for whatever reason, but Prince/King Charles was not. This is also why Prince Andrew is being cast aside. He still believes in the monarchy as an institution and the PTB don't want to him to be seen as a viable successor. This would be after Prince William either refuses to become monarch or becomes monarch and abdicates within weeks/months. The PTB want King Charles III to essentially be the last monarch of the U.K.. The same casting aside has happened with Prince Harry as well, for the same reason.   

 

 

For sure, there are bound to be plenty of folks that visited Epstein's island who we are unaware of.

 

I wouldn't be at all surprised if William abdicated,  but there is a very long line of succession,  even with harry and andrew out of the picture,  if they are nwo puppets, I cant see much point in getting rid of them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lobster said:

I wouldn't be at all surprised if William abdicated,  but there is a very long line of succession,  even with harry and andrew out of the picture,  if they are nwo puppets, I cant see much point in getting rid of them

 

The casting aside of the extended royal family, in the consciousness of the sheeple, has been going on for a long time now and is pretty much complete. The sheeple will be more likely to go along with the abolition of the monarchy, which William himself will be subtly cheerleading, if no one viable is seen as a replacement for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, numnuts said:

 

The casting aside of the extended royal family, in the consciousness of the sheeple, has been going on for a long time now and is pretty much complete. The sheeple will be more likely to go along with the abolition of the monarchy, which William himself will be subtly cheerleading, if no one viable is seen as a replacement for him.

Charles has two other siblings, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

Sounding like a broken record here, I know, but that ain't him.

 

Jap PM knows what he's saying.

 

So why aren't they telling us, what's the big secret.

Are the royals so important to them that they need to be kept in operation, why? I thought royals were out and one world government in.

So much secrecy, like jacob rothschild who died recently, for someone who was so wealthy and had so much control over the world, most people did not even know of his existence, no details were disclosed of his death, where he died, what did he die of, what  happened to him, now chaz has kicked the bucket and they are not disclosing anything, all secrecy and cover ups. I think kate's dead as well, the middleton's are finished which was made clear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Grumpy Grapes said:

 

The British Commonwealth might keep the Royals more relevant than they deserve.

 

I may be wrong , but I dont see them going anywhere, they are by any reasonable interpretation part of elite, the sway they hold over the nation is such that it is more likely they will be used to control the nation than done away with and replaced with a Republic of some description. 

 

Which would undoubtedly be more democratic and put more power in the hands of the people than is currently the case,where at least in theoretical situations we have all most 

Non,

 

no right to choose our own government for instance, the monarchy asking the leader of the largest party to form a government is custom and practice and not a legal requirement,  they could equally choose any party if they wished and have done so in the past 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jack121 said:

 

So why aren't they telling us, what's the big secret.

Are the royals so important to them that they need to be kept in operation, why? I thought royals were out and one world government in.

So much secrecy, like jacob rothschild who died recently, for someone who was so wealthy and had so much control over the world, most people did not even know of his existence, no details were disclosed of his death, where he died, what did he die of, what  happened to him, now chaz has kicked the bucket and they are not disclosing anything, all secrecy and cover ups. I think kate's dead as well, the middleton's are finished which was made clear

They kept Queenie's demise from the public for almost a year (Nov to the next Sep). This alt. Charlie has been used several times for TV interviews and public appearances (when contact with the public is needed). I presume most ppl don't care enough to notice, or notice enough to care, that it's a stand-in.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Grumpy Grapes said:

 

Call me a dipsy doodah, but I still think it's him. The voice sounds genuine, and a mixture of old age and health can cause significant changes in the face. Noses grow bigger. 

 

His speech:

 

https://cdn.jwplayer.com/previews/YqQa4AX4

 

Noses can grow bigger but not by that much, his hairline is receeding differently as well and his ears have changed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could only manage (through choice) to watch a small snippet of the Christmas day speech.

 

I couldn't say whether I thought it was really him or not - it depends which version of 'him' you're comparing it to, and they all seem unnatural to me.

 

I assume the famous sausage fingers were kept out of shot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jack121 said:

Noses can grow bigger but not by that much, his hairline is receeding differently as well and his ears have changed

I really notice his wrinkles/ lines on his forehead are no longer there, which you would expect them to be more defined in the same place with age. Combined with the hairline changing. Also, his face and nose was narrower previously, plus the colour of his skin/face has totally changed as well (from a red/ pink hue). I bet his side profile is different as well, would be good to compare that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Khan given royal knighthood to celebrate his many " achievements ". We must now bow down and call him Sir khan

 

GgFJ4DyW4AAqf12.jpg.132667422f5c82ccb979683dc9c717d4.jpg

 

Under shitbag khan levels of knife crime in London and missed housing targets have massively increased. Londoners have faced a 61% increase in knife crime, a housing crisis, and a 70% increase in council tax – they will rightly be furious that khan's track record of failure is being rewarded.

By rewarding the failing Khan, Starmer has shown once again that for Labour it is Party first, people and country last.

Strangely khan used to work as a human rights lawyer before entering Parliament as MP for Tooting for Labour in 2005. He became mayor of London in 2016, replacing Boris Johnson, and has since won two further terms.

Could this be the first WEF knighthood, which has now devalued the honours sytem into a laughing joke, because you could not make this stuff up, except if you were a king. Maybe the king should rename london into islamabad

Khan also has a mania for cleaner air and imposition of the ultra-low emission zone (Ulez), increasing taxes, bringing on new taxes, worshipping dictator policies from the UN and WEF, who he is best friends with, and sucking satan's cock

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, jack121 said:

Khan given royal knighthood to celebrate his many " achievements ". We must now bow down and call him Sir khan

 

GgFJ4DyW4AAqf12.jpg.132667422f5c82ccb979683dc9c717d4.jpg

 

Under shitbag khan levels of knife crime in London and missed housing targets have massively increased. Londoners have faced a 61% increase in knife crime, a housing crisis, and a 70% increase in council tax – they will rightly be furious that khan's track record of failure is being rewarded.

By rewarding the failing Khan, Starmer has shown once again that for Labour it is Party first, people and country last.

Strangely khan used to work as a human rights lawyer before entering Parliament as MP for Tooting for Labour in 2005. He became mayor of London in 2016, replacing Boris Johnson, and has since won two further terms.

Could this be the first WEF knighthood, which has now devalued the honours sytem into a laughing joke, because you could not make this stuff up, except if you were a king. Maybe the king should rename london into islamabad

Khan also has a mania for cleaner air and imposition of the ultra-low emission zone (Ulez), increasing taxes, bringing on new taxes, worshipping dictator policies from the UN and WEF, who he is best friends with, and sucking satan's cock

 

They're giving this maggot his good boy drops for taking their orders. With a majority of "ethnic minorities" in London, its clear to see how democracy is BS, and they intend to play this out across the jUK. 

 

Invasion orchestrated by the SoS

 

 

Edited by NeoScota
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/2/2025 at 7:56 AM, jack121 said:

Khan given royal knighthood to celebrate his many " achievements ". We must now bow down and call him Sir khan

 

GgFJ4DyW4AAqf12.jpg.132667422f5c82ccb979683dc9c717d4.jpg

 

Under shitbag khan levels of knife crime in London and missed housing targets have massively increased. Londoners have faced a 61% increase in knife crime, a housing crisis, and a 70% increase in council tax – they will rightly be furious that khan's track record of failure is being rewarded.

By rewarding the failing Khan, Starmer has shown once again that for Labour it is Party first, people and country last.

Strangely khan used to work as a human rights lawyer before entering Parliament as MP for Tooting for Labour in 2005. He became mayor of London in 2016, replacing Boris Johnson, and has since won two further terms.

Could this be the first WEF knighthood, which has now devalued the honours sytem into a laughing joke, because you could not make this stuff up, except if you were a king. Maybe the king should rename london into islamabad

Khan also has a mania for cleaner air and imposition of the ultra-low emission zone (Ulez), increasing taxes, bringing on new taxes, worshipping dictator policies from the UN and WEF, who he is best friends with, and sucking satan's cock

 

The honour system has rewarded some real scumbags, if it's in disrepute,  it has been for a long time, sir Jimmy savile for instance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, jack121 said:

But does anyone care about the honours list ? some old nazi scumbag makes a list of the people he likes - so what, who cares

Well it's a bit more underhand than that, it's to the most part, not Charles but kier making the list. They used to be mainly people you had never heard of, being rewarded for political support/ donations etc. Realising that this was a bit unpopular,  they started to give them out to celebrities/ sports stars etal, which make the headlines and obscure the others they would rather you didnt know about. Then they thought what we will do is hand out honours to lollipop ladies etc, to obscure it a bit more and pretend it's anything but a  :you scratch my back, il scratch yours "payment system 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...