Royal Thread - All royal stories here please

[Anti Facts Sir]

29 minutes ago, Sportsfan28 said:

The cine camera style footage in the video reminds me of the tapes from Sinister lol. But honestly, she still has her hair, we have no idea when this video was filmed and half of it looks AI. I'm just wondering if she is dead and has been for a while, and the cancer thing was an excuse to get her out of the way for a while, or if she is alive and just playing her role in something, such as bringing in an apparent cancer vaccine or something. 

Fleur de Lis dress could be symbolic. Trouble is, that's a symbol for all sorts of stuff. 

 

Royalty itself..but life, purity, motherhood..and the one which caught my attention...the restoration of innocence to a lost soul.

 

Whatever the reason, we can be sure it's not just something "she" decided to put on that morning.

[k_j_evans]

3 hours ago, Sit down, Waldo said:

As real as any Indian Moon landing video I've seen 

 

She's had to pass down her only jumper as well. Hard times.

I'd have thought it would be a bit big for her daughter - perhaps that's why she's had to tie it round her middle.

[itsnotallrightjack]

6 hours ago, Martin1234 said:

I thought chemo made your hair fall out?

 

I have read from comments on various media outlets that not all of these cancer drugs will make the hair fall out, but, that has to be rare doesn't it, because how many people do you know who've endured that treatment (or seen in the media) lose their hair? They all do, that I have seen. 

 

Maybe a very low dose pill is the rare time it doesn't make hair fall out? From what I've read preventative treatments are often low dose pills not those toxic cocktail infusions.

 

 

[itsnotallrightjack]

2 hours ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

Depends on the drug given. Some oral chemo drugs don't cause hair loss in small doses. But I wonder if Katie was given drugs not available to the general public?

 

I think this is quite likely- a very low dose pill (perhaps one per week even). Certainly there are some drugs that the NHS don't have access to, due to the cost.

[Observations]

“Reflect”

“darkness”

“light”

 

Pathetic. Even if it’s real, it’s a cheap shot? You’d think they’d be ashamed to lower themselves. 
 

Is this royalty or footballers wives? 
 

I notice the camera doesn’t stay on her long, and there’s a bit of a lingering shot of her hair from behind. 

 

When I heard the voice on the radio it sounded wishy washy and fake?
 

There’s a few comments on YouTube saying ‘heartfelt’. I had to skip to the end to find any scorn. 

[numnuts]

1 hour ago, itsnotallrightjack said:

I think this is quite likely - a very low dose pill (perhaps one per week even). Certainly there are some drugs that the NHS don't have access to, due to the cost.

 

Don't you think it is more likely, regardless of whether she is alive or dead right now, that she never had cancer to begin with?

[jack121]

Kate Middleton frolicking in the forest filming her new cringe PR video to say that her “preventative chemo” is complete after months of not working and milking this for a spectacle. It’s completely unhinged.

[jack121]

[jack121]

666

Did you know...
King Charles owns 6 point 6 billion acres of land and 1 6th of Earth's surface

[Campion]

22 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

is it me or do the kids look in a different resolution to her?

 

far be it to suggest they'd fake a royal photo.

 

Yeah, they used to do that with Angela Lansbury In Murder She Wrote, I thought it was to hide wrinkles.  I think her abdomen, where she had the surgery, looks unsymmetrical, as if it's fuller on her left - perhaps a colostomy bag? 

[Puzzle]

If any of them had cancer, they'd be cured of it quick sharpish with frequencies but they don't need to be. None of them have ever had it. They die when they're meant to die and not before. They put on a shit show!

[itsnotallrightjack]

23 hours ago, numnuts said:

 

Don't you think it is more likely, regardless of whether she is alive or dead right now, that she never had cancer to begin with?

 

Possibly! Who knows!

[itsnotallrightjack]

7 hours ago, Puzzle said:

If any of them had cancer, they'd be cured of it quick sharpish with frequencies but they don't need to be. None of them have ever had it. They die when they're meant to die and not before. They put on a shit show!

 

If that were possible then millionaire celebrities wouldn't die of cancer. Given their desire to be young, fit, and keeping on making money they'd be the first in line for "miracle cures."

[Observations]

Monday 9th Sept

 

GB News Headliners opened with this and ‘it’ was on the front page of every paper. When I say ‘it’ I don’t mean Kate, I mean her Cancer advert  
 

Andrew Doyle; “ Have you watched it? What was it like? ”
 

Josh Howie; “ I don’t know if you’ve watched any French .. or Arabic (movies) .. it was fuzzy in corners, like a dream, a fairy tale. “
 

Lewis Schaffer “ You know what it looked like? It looked like an American drug advertisement. Like everything turns out alright. You, with the use of our chemotherapy, can live and then walk in the woods and the fields … “
 

Andrew; “ Isn’t that a positive message? “
 

Lewis; “ No, because we’ve learned nothing “ 

 

Lewis; “ We don’t even know what type of cancer it is “

 

Josh; “ She doesn’t have to tell us what type of cancer it is “

 

Lewis; “ No, but it would be nice to know “

 

Lewis; “ I don’t believe that chemotherapy can cure cancer “

 

Josh; “ An oncologist is more likely to know than you “

 

Lewis; “ You don’t cure cancer, it’s … “

 

Edited September 11, 2024 by Observations
Missed letter

[LastOneLeftInTheCounty]

On 9/9/2024 at 5:45 PM, SuperstarNeilC said:

 

It looks like an advert for Centre Parcs.

 

I like the tasteful 8mm filtered cutaways of the family frolicking around, as if it’s harking back to a nostalgic bygone age where they were trouble free and wholesome.

 

Notice how every shot of Kate on her own, she is shown either facing the light in a dark forest, or out in the light of a field- symbolising her re-emerging ‘into the light’

 

Also take note of the tree/log/wood symbolism. I think some of their previous family photos were infront of a firewood stack. This has a hidden meaning referencing satanism.

 

All in all it’s a job well done. Very slick but also cringe at the same time 

[Lady Baynham]

 Have they the knowledge to make this film out of pixels and editing, blurring and cutting? I am not sure on that.

What I am sure about is, if they can make it, then one hundred percent ,its a fake news bonanza.

 

[Observations]

I often think of the ‘fake’ Einstein advert which is just one example ; 

 

 

https://themill.com/the-mill/work/smart-energy-einstein-knows-best/

[LastOneLeftInTheCounty]

21 hours ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

It looks like an advert for Centre Parcs.

 

I like the tasteful 8mm filtered cutaways of the family frolicking around, as if it’s harking back to a nostalgic bygone age where they were trouble free and wholesome.

 

Notice how every shot of Kate on her own, she is shown either facing the light in a dark forest, or out in the light of a field- symbolising her re-emerging ‘into the light’

 

Also take note of the tree/log/wood symbolism. I think some of their previous family photos were infront of a firewood stack. This has a hidden meaning referencing satanism.

 

All in all it’s a job well done. Very slick but also cringe at the same time 

I mean why did they do this? 
 

They didn’t need to do this.

 

It reeks of narcissism.

 

Who are they trying to convince? Us or them? Both more likely 

[Observations]

28 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

I mean why did they do this? 
 

They didn’t need to do this.

 

It reeks of narcissism.

 

Who are they trying to convince? Us or them? Both more likely 

I thought they did it partly because they seem to want to change the role or image of royalty. Maybe because the era of pomp and ceremony and being openly lavish has to at least appear to be over. The end of britishness. The end of pride in your country. The end of belonging to something? Now ‘it’ just seems to be about promoting sickness and Netflix, and pretending to be greener. 
 

I know not everyone feels the ‘old’ way about royalty, but I think ‘it’ did somehow represent ‘something’ that was a connection to the past. 
 

There is also a lot of contradiction. One minute the King has to avoid germs. The next he’s shaking hands and being hugged. 
 

Harry gets dragged up once a fortnight or so, when there’s a quiet news day. 

[jack121]

But charles is clearly dead, as is evident by all the obvious body doubles that keep turning up at royal events. The jap PM who has known charles all his life stated he met a double.

Kate is as dead as is evident as she looked tweny years younger at Trooping, and has looked different at every other royal event - was there any actor strike going on ?

 

Are the royals just kept hanging around to push agendas because they have enough of an influential hold on the stupid sheep

[LastOneLeftInTheCounty]

On 9/12/2024 at 2:03 PM, Observations said:

I thought they did it partly because they seem to want to change the role or image of royalty. Maybe because the era of pomp and ceremony and being openly lavish has to at least appear to be over. The end of britishness. The end of pride in your country. The end of belonging to something? Now ‘it’ just seems to be about promoting sickness and Netflix, and pretending to be greener. 
 

I know not everyone feels the ‘old’ way about royalty, but I think ‘it’ did somehow represent ‘something’ that was a connection to the past. 
 

There is also a lot of contradiction. One minute the King has to avoid germs. The next he’s shaking hands and being hugged. 
 

Harry gets dragged up once a fortnight or so, when there’s a quiet news day. 

Not sure about changing the image of royalty, they’ll always be royalty no matter how much they try to promote themselves as a lifestyle brand. 
 

It’s like they’re trying to cover something up. I guess I’m saying- they’re royalty- they didn’t need to go to those lengths to ‘prove’ how fashionable they are or how close their family is, or how aspirational their perfect lives are.
 

To me it’s seems like they’ve cheapened their brand, like a step down from who they actually are.

It seems desperate. Desperate to prove something or cover something up. I dunno. It’s just plain weird

[Puzzle]

On 9/11/2024 at 1:53 AM, itsnotallrightjack said:

 

If that were possible then millionaire celebrities wouldn't die of cancer. Given their desire to be young, fit, and keeping on making money they'd be the first in line for "miracle cures."

 

Can - Sir

 

You get what you're given fake money or not. Every single person, doesn't matter what your fake status is.

Edited September 14, 2024 by Puzzle
grammar error

[jack121]

Chaz's latest rant in the media again, speaking from the WEF. Stating we need a reset

 

Nothing new here then

 

 

[jack121]

Little Willy turns up somewhere and waves again, then expects you to pay all of his bills

 

Pity no one else turned up. Not one royal supporter, not one sheep to be seen:

 

[Observations]

Fancy a joke?!

My bold …
 

Channel 5

22:00 - 23:30

 

Kate Middleton her life in pictures. Kate, a beacon of dedication and warmth, is adored by a nation.  This captivating film offers an intimate look at her remarkable life by delving into her most iconic photos.