LastOneLeftInTheCounty Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 24 minutes ago, greatdayforfreedom said: I get really bad vibes coming from her husband. He gives off a dark energy. There is just something about him. Ditto 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 3 hours ago, northern star said: Mysterious things to me thus far are that two suspicious looking fisherman were seen by different witnesses at around 7.30am on the Thursday and Friday mornings - doesnt seem to have been addressed or followed up by the police Police sniffer dogs have come up with nothing - one reason could be that she was abducted via the water, hence putting them off the scent. Which might throw further light on the fisherman suspects, who could have been in the water and orchestrated her abduction It all seems set up for a perfect Maddie type news story - many perfectly lit photos of her right at the crime scene on her FB page, helping to make it go viral In these days of a supposed 24/7 Orwellian Big Brother surveillance state, a woman can completely disappear in a small field, with a fitbit and bluetooth car keys The son of the "grumpy woman" was in control of the CCTV camera which didnt work and which could have provided vital clues. Did it break before or after the disappearance? As said above, the Teams call. Apparently it was audible only, but why is there no info from the police about it? The last human contact she had. The partner put a large branch in the water where she disappeared to see if it would float away and it didnt, it hardly moved in an hour. The drowning scenario is the least likely, yet the police spent two vital weeks focusing on this theory and area of shallow water. They still are they are focusing on the salt marshes and estuary now it’s totally bonkers 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Oh look, the search divers are admitting "mistakes" were made. Now I am waiting for "lessons to be learned". 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperstarNeilC Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 The image of the woman in the yellow coat. That’s not a baby in the pram. - It looks more like an old woman. - Look at the size of the head. - And its got no legs. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted February 12 Author Share Posted February 12 15 minutes ago, Anti Facts Sir said: Oh look, the search divers are admitting "mistakes" were made. Now I am waiting for "lessons to be learned". Yeah! Absolutely, let's be clear .... It ain't really funny, but ... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 (edited) 6 hours ago, Human10 said: It's not like she's been abducted though. I feel she is dead. EDIT: According to the electoral roll, it looks like NB was in Lancashire in 2002 and PA registered between 2003-2009..... that's a long time ago. So the question is what other more important event/issue are they trying to hide using this story? Edited February 12 by DaleP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperstarNeilC Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 1 hour ago, SuperstarNeilC said: The image of the woman in the yellow coat. That’s not a baby in the pram. - It looks more like an old woman. - Look at the size of the head. - And its got no legs. How could they say this profile picture is her? If I gave this poor quality photo showing not her full face, they will reject my evidence. But hey, this is acceptable for them eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malbec Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 48 minutes ago, SuperstarNeilC said: That second interview that the partner Paul did (the channel 5 one?), is quite painful to watch. As in, it makes you cringe when he struggling for the words with inordinate pauses. When he describes her, he uses the most generic terms, like things that people would put on a dating profile or soemthing. Nothing personal such as an anecdote about how funny, fun or loyal she is. And what is apparent from watching both interviews I have seen, is that he doesn't seem to naturally draw sympathy or empathy. Which is really unusual. Normally, when we watch some kind of interview of someone in a terrible situation, we naturally empathise without trying, but that does not happen at all here for me. Which is really weird. We must pick up on signals in order to empathise perhaps on a subconscious level, through reading body language, irrespective of actual words. I don't find any empathy with what he is saying about him or the children because it seems disingenuous. 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malbec Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 50 minutes ago, DaleP said: How could they say this profile picture is her? If I gave this poor quality photo showing not her full face, they will reject my evidence. But hey, this is acceptable for them eh? It's not supposed to be her I don't think? Just some woman they were looking to speak to her early on in the investigation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 10 minutes ago, Malbec said: It's not supposed to be her I don't think? Just some woman they were looking to speak to her early on in the investigation. It ain't Su Pollard, that's for sure. She never got to be a Yellow coat. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velma Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 She's not in the river, nor in the sea, where oh where can Nicola be? Cue, eggman and spotty man and a succession of shady suspects.... https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other/two-suspicious-men-seen-close-to-where-nicola-bulley-went-missing-witnesses-claim/ar-AA17nR4l 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velma Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 “Is there any point to which you would wish to draw my attention?' 'To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.' 'The dog did nothing in the night-time.' 'That was the curious incident,' remarked Sherlock Holmes.” Another curious incident Holmes, in the interview with Paul Ansell at home, the dog which did not bark, is wearing its harness, indoors. Elementary my dear Watson, they are using Willow as a prop, wearing the harness found at the scene. Indupitably! 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 9 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said: Oh look, the search divers are admitting "mistakes" were made. Now I am waiting for "lessons to be learned". Thoughts and prayers 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 1 hour ago, Velma said: “Is there any point to which you would wish to draw my attention?' 'To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.' 'The dog did nothing in the night-time.' 'That was the curious incident,' remarked Sherlock Holmes.” Another curious incident Holmes, in the interview with Paul Ansell at home, the dog which did not bark, is wearing its harness, indoors. Elementary my dear Watson, they are using Willow as a prop, wearing the harness found at the scene. Indupitably! Crisis dog 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Alert Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 11 hours ago, alexa said: Maybe it's to get us out of the country & into one of these 15 min Cities ?? Just a thought! I am personally not following this story nor have any interest in its details. I am rather detached from it all. However, I am interested in what is going on here with another MSM story blown out of all proportions. What is the agenda catch, 15 minute cities, as you mention? Electronic track and trace microchipping for your safety? Pushing the false idea that the State is all caring and everyone matters? Or just plain distraction from more important things? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 (edited) 1 hour ago, Orange Alert said: Or just plain distraction from more important things? As follows: 1. Well, we have some loons trying to start World War III, even if it doesn't involve a great nuclear exchange. In fact, the primary purpose of such a war will be for tyrannical governments to clamp down on their domestic populations, in the event of mass consciousness reaching a tipping point. However, no one wants such a war obviously, regardless of the motives. 2. We have all of the excess deaths occurring, caused by the vaccines, while the NHS is collapsing. I think that this is the Numero Uno issue that the PTB want to distract from right now. 3. We have the global pandemic treaty, which will hand over power to the WHO, in the offing. 4. And we have Brexit cancellation on the horizon, which I assume we all knew was coming. If anyone thinks that Gove is a Brexiteer, as I said from Day One, then they must be on crack or something. Edited February 12 by numnuts 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masonfreeparty2 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 i guess richard d hall wont be covering this case now or will he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masonfreeparty2 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 16 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said: Interesting, she looks similar to this Bulley woman. When was that stabbing...same time of year? I am thinking there is something ritualistic about the timing of many of these. it was 21st december..interestingly the murderer lived on the same road in bradford as a yorkshire truth group used to meet up but i cant think of their actual name now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 26 minutes ago, masonfreeparty2 said: i guess richard d hall wont be covering this case now or will he? I think he has shot through after the recent bbc expose which ironically he has courted for the past 15 years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 The love of your life/mother of kids goes missing but you only decide to look for her with the dog for a casual walk the day after and then you’re more worried about your appearance for the tv cameras it doesn’t make sense. This is John Shuttleworth’s reaction when his wife went missing which might be comedy but is closer to the truth of a man panicking to find his wife. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
factJack Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 21 hours ago, Anthony81 said: Oh dear they clearly do not look the same, this is no fake media psyop Why are youGov doing a poll? https://yougov.co.uk/topics/media/survey-results/daily/2023/02/09/2a8de/1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 20 minutes ago, factJack said: Why are youGov doing a poll? https://yougov.co.uk/topics/media/survey-results/daily/2023/02/09/2a8de/1 So, it *is* a pysop....why else would they ask "how closely are you following this story?" Another social behaviour experiment to see how gullible the public are, and whether they take notice of the crap they put out in the media. 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 2 hours ago, Orange Alert said: I am personally not following this story nor have any interest in its details. I am rather detached from it all. However, I am interested in what is going on here with another MSM story blown out of all proportions. What is the agenda catch, 15 minute cities, as you mention? Electronic track and trace microchipping for your safety? Pushing the false idea that the State is all caring and everyone matters? Or just plain distraction from more important things? I would say that this is all one of a hell big distraction from something bigger going on. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Human10 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 58 minutes ago, factJack said: Why are youGov doing a poll? https://yougov.co.uk/topics/media/survey-results/daily/2023/02/09/2a8de/1 They should make pool asking what people think happened to her... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.