Dagon44 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Just now, Anti Facts Sir said: Interesting, she looks similar to this Bulley woman. When was that stabbing...same time of year? I am thinking there is something ritualistic about the timing of many of these. Well there is the Celtic festival of Imbolc which must have been inverted to some satanic sacrifice ritual by those that cannot be blamed for nothing https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-magazine-monitor-25976883.amp 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Human10 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 On 2/7/2023 at 4:33 PM, SuperstarNeilC said: It's a really strange case, in that there doesn't seem to be many things that could have happen, but all of them seem very odd. It's most likely that she fell in the river and drowned sadly. It seems odd that she did, but these things do happen unfortunately. There was a potential route out of the area, unseen by CCTV but in broad daylight you'd be surprised she just left her phone and dog and went with someone under duress. She could have gone with someone she knew, but again, you'd imagine she'd take her phone and dog. Maybe she was having some mental health problems and wanted to escape, so left her phone and dog and disappeared of her own accord. I find that very strange though. Wouldn't you leave your dog at home in that case? Wouldn't you take the kids to school and then just go? You wouldn't be thinking logically but I doubt you'd join a work call and then decide to do it. It's a baffling case. The very experienced diver with the top of the range equipment has said he's never been involved in one like it and if she was in the river he's certain he'd have found her by now. The phone left on the bench suggests she left suddenly, or if somebody abducted her they made her leave it there as people know you can be tracked by your phone signal. Leaving the phone, unless forced to do so, suggests a sudden panic to make her rush off and leave it as the situation at that moment took precedent over everything else. The dog falling into the water would be one instance but that has been discounted as it was dry. As has the tennis ball theory as I believe she didn't take it. The other possibility is somebody she knew and trusted suddenly shouted to her to come quickly. If said in a state of panic it would make her jump up and forget the phone and everything else to rush off to follow them fearing the worst. I believe there were obstacles and gates in the area that could have prevented the dog following her and returning home. That explains why it remained there in an agitated state. It couldn't follow her and she didn't come back. Sadly unless she has effected her own disappearance I fear a tragic outcome as I guess everyone else does. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northern star Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Jeremy Vine refers to it as a "murder" in BBC radio slip up https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11736105/Jeremy-Vine-accidentally-calls-Nicola-Bulley-missing-person-case-murder-live-BBC-radio-error.html 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperstarNeilC Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 58 minutes ago, SuperstarNeilC said: DARK ENERGY IN ST MICHAEL’S ON WYRE ABBEYSTEAD DISASTER In 1984 there was a massive explosion at Abbystead water pumping station (which pumps into River Wyre). ALL of 16 killed were from St Michae’s on Wyre. ABBEYSTEAD 10 miles from Nikki’s bench. Scroll to 2 hours 30 of video. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperstarNeilC Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 ^^^^^ ^^^^^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbeystead_disaster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 6 hours ago, Sit down, Waldo said: Is teams a live call, or is it just messaging? Microsoft Teams is basically the same thing as Skype, which is also owned by Microsoft. It also allows group conferencing video/audio calls/meetings same as Zoom. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 1 hour ago, SuperstarNeilC said: ABBEYSTEAD DISASTER In 1984 there was a massive explosion at Abbystead water pumping station (which pumps into River Wyre). ALL of 16 killed were from St Michae’s on Wyre. ABBEYSTEAD 10 miles from Nikki’s bench. Weird you mentioned the Abbeystead disaster, with that bomb also going off in Great Yarmouth, unplanned, just yesterday. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-64604115 'Great Yarmouth: Huge blast after unplanned WW2 bomb detonation.' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Yarmouth_explosion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbeystead_disaster 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 3 hours ago, Velma said: This has to be dullest psy-op ever! The fact that it’s getting media saturation and ‘TV specials’ already is in itself a huge red flag. Dan Walker of Channel 5 news spent two hours chatting merrily to Paul Ansell, the distraught husband, although he wasn’t, Paul appeared quite composed. The whole exercise seemed geared towards exonerating Paul and Mark Williams-Thomas, the “expert” said “he spoke from the heart” so he’s not involved. Paul said, he’s feeling “anger, utter frustration, confusion, disbelief” and nothing feels real, “it’s like the Truman Show.” No shit! When asked to describe Nicola, her partner said she is “fun, loving and loyal” and her best friend described her with the same words. He had to be prompted by Dan as to what he would say if she was watching, Paul looked at Dan, not the camera and said, “I love you” and “come home.” The McCann’s did not speak to their missing daughter via the camera either, to offer words of comfort, until it was suggested, or make a plea to her alleged kidnapper to let her go. Paul was equally unconvincing and Dan Walker answered most of the questions he asked, himself. Williams-Thomas was hammering home the message that they need to give it a high profile to “keep the public onside” because they “will solve it” and “keep talking to the press.” Then conversely stated that online speculation can be “hurtful” while Parm Sandhu said, “it doesn’t help.” Meanwhile, Paul Ansell demands that “every house, garage, outbuilding and the land is searched” which would not only be a violation of privacy, but imply everyone is a suspect. It also requires giving the police powers way beyond what is permitted. It remains an “impossible situation.” I agree, this all smacks of a media psy-op to me the way this is panning out. In fact, it bears more than a passing resemblance to the Madeleine McCann case. A two-hour TV interview? While out for a walk around Sheldon Country Park in Birmingham this afternoon, I passed by a young family, and one of their children asked their parents "have they found Nicola Bulley yet?" It seems this is all designed to have a mass psychological effect on the wider population, the purpose of which is yet to be revealed, but there will be one somewhere. I'm also concerned by the number of TikTok'ers and YouTubers making 'commentary' videos on this, as it would also appear that some people are exploiting this to raise their own profiles, as well as harvesting 'likes' and attention/comments. Social engineering, or a massive distraction, who really knows... 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 What is the American company he works for during the nighttime which he alluded to in last nights interview? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 55 minutes ago, northern star said: Jeremy Vine refers to it as a "murder" in BBC radio slip up https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11736105/Jeremy-Vine-accidentally-calls-Nicola-Bulley-missing-person-case-murder-live-BBC-radio-error.html Whoops tptb and the media probably know exactly what has happened 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saved Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 If this is a psyop then they want us to believe that he is in some way connected to her death - much like if Maddie was a psyop they wanted us to believe that the parents were connected to her death. If this is a psyop then it's designed to exasperate anybody who cannot rest without seeing justice done - a wearing down of reasonably minded people. "What's the point of caring anymore - evil always triumphs" 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northern star Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) 25 minutes ago, Dagon44 said: Whoops tptb and the media probably know exactly what has happened Yep, classic. Its like when guilty parties refer to a missing person in the past tense, without supposedly knowing whether theyre still alive or not. Edited February 11 by northern star 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperstarNeilC Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 5 hours ago, SuperstarNeilC said: She says this mansion has been **fully searched** by police. WHY would the police search it ? WHEN was it searched ? There’s *no* video of police activity in its grounds. //// //// //// She says that “Nikki’s friends” want us to know this information. - Why would Nikki’s friends want us to know this ? //// //// //// The Grizzly crime analyst also mentions “Nikki’s friends” give her information (saying that she can’t reveal all that they tell her). WHAT have they told her that she can’t reveal ? Are “Nikki’s friends” putting out disinformation ? To throw us off the scent ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) 8 minutes ago, northern star said: Yep, classic. Its like when guilty parties refer to a missing person in the past tense, without supposedly knowing whether theyre still alive or not. I think the McCanns might have done that. God knows it really is mysterious I think it is either : the husband and whatever organisation he is in has killed her in some kind of ritual days before the official disappearance and he can get full protection because he is a senior person in that or it’s just a very sophisticated psyop and she is back in another identity after playing her role the kids haven’t been seen which is strange so they may be now be with Nicola bulley or whatever her real name is Fridays tv program was supposed to be about blood family her sister mother etc having there say but they don’t seem to exist in any real sense apart from the husband who looks like a failed actor and her friend who looks like she is in disguise quite literally with the false eye lashes etc Edited February 11 by Dagon44 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sit down, Waldo Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 1 hour ago, Grumpy Owl said: Microsoft Teams is basically the same thing as Skype, which is also owned by Microsoft. It also allows group conferencing video/audio calls/meetings same as Zoom. Thank you! So there's probably some audio of any event that occurred. Why isn't this mentioned? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Just now, Dagon44 said: God knows it really is mysterious I think it is either : the husband and whatever organisation he is in has killed her in some kind of ritual days before the official disappearance and he can get full protection because he is a senior person in that or it’s just a very sophisticated psyop and she is back in another identity after playing her role 6 minutes ago, SuperstarNeilC said: She says this mansion has been **fully searched** by police. WHY would the police search it ? WHEN was it searched ? There’s *no* video of police activity in its grounds. //// //// //// She says that “Nikki’s friends” want us to know this information. - Why would Nikki’s friends want us to know this ? //// //// //// The Grizzly crime analyst also mentions “Nikki’s friends” give her information (saying that she can’t reveal all that they tell her). WHAT have they told her that she can’t reveal ? Are “Nikki’s friends” putting out disinformation ? To throw us off the scent ? Yes yesterdays tv program was to reassure us that the partner really was an ok guy he looked anxious as hell a lot or kinesthetic nlp eye movement and scratching of his leg no pleading with a potential abductor to set her free Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 3 minutes ago, Sit down, Waldo said: Thank you! So there's probably some audio of any event that occurred. Why isn't this mentioned? It is a good question and one of the first that I asked. Quote Timeline of events 08:43 - Ms Bulley walked along the path by the River Wyre, having dropped her children off at school 08:47 - A dog walker who knows Ms Bulley saw her walking along the lower field. Their two dogs interacted briefly 08:53 - Ms Bulley sent an email to her boss 09:01 - She logged into a Teams call About 09:10 - A witness who knows Ms Bulley saw her on the upper field walking Willow 09:20 - Police inquiries suggest her phone was on the bench 09:30 - The Teams call ended but she stayed logged on About 09:35 - Ms Bulley's mobile phone and Willow were found at a bench by the river From: https://www.richplanet.net/20230127.php Now I appreciate that joining a Teams call from a mobile phone might have meant that she joined 'audio only', and may have had her phone mic turned off - so she was simply listening in - but still it is an important detail that is mostly being overlooked. She apparently worked as a 'mortgage advisor'? Did she regularly 'work from home'? If so, did she regularly join Teams calls from her mobile phone? What was the purpose of this Teams call? (Daily 'briefing' or whatever?) Who else participated in these calls? Should she have been at home 'working' instead of taking her dog for a walk? Did she make any excuse during this call as to why she may 'step away' for a moment? 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northern star Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) Mysterious things to me thus far are that two suspicious looking fisherman were seen by different witnesses at around 7.30am on the Thursday and Friday mornings - doesnt seem to have been addressed or followed up by the police Police sniffer dogs have come up with nothing - one reason could be that she was abducted via the water, hence putting them off the scent. Which might throw further light on the fisherman suspects, who could have been in the water and orchestrated her abduction It all seems set up for a perfect Maddie type news story - many perfectly lit photos of her right at the crime scene on her FB page, helping to make it go viral In these days of a supposed 24/7 Orwellian Big Brother surveillance state, a woman can completely disappear in a small field, with a fitbit and bluetooth car keys The son of the "grumpy woman" was in control of the CCTV camera which didnt work and which could have provided vital clues. Did it break before or after the disappearance? As said above, the Teams call. Apparently it was audible only, but why is there no info from the police about it? The last human contact she had. The partner put a large branch in the water where she disappeared to see if it would float away and it didnt, it hardly moved in an hour. The drowning scenario is the least likely, yet the police spent two vital weeks focusing on this theory and area of shallow water. Edited February 11 by northern star 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LastOneLeftInTheCounty Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 4 hours ago, Velma said: Dan Walker of Channel 5 news spent two hours chatting merrily to Paul Ansell, the distraught husband, although he wasn’t, Paul appeared quite composed. That Paul fella looked well creepy. The whole thing stinks. And Dan Walker looks like a butter faced teenager in a middle aged man suit. F*** both of them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) 49 minutes ago, Dagon44 said: Yes yesterdays tv program was to reassure us that the partner really was an ok guy he looked anxious as hell a lot or kinesthetic nlp eye movement and scratching of his leg no pleading with a potential abductor to set her free From watching one of his press interviews the other day, I could tell one thing for sure. He was recounting things that he had already mentally rehearsed. This doesn't necessarily cast aspersions on him though, as someone completely innocent might also do the same thing, in such a case. It just struck me as a bit odd. Edited February 11 by numnuts 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperstarNeilC Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 If those two shady-looking fishermen wore waterproof waders they could have been in the water directly in front of the bench. - Whence they could have dragged her to the opposite bank, across to the mansion. - To keep her captive in it or drive her away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 2 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said: It seems this is all designed to have a mass psychological effect on the wider population, the purpose of which is yet to be revealed, but there will be one somewhere Maybe it's to get us out of the country & into one of these 15 min Cities ?? Just a thought! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saved Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 1 hour ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said: That Paul fella looked well creepy. The whole thing stinks. And Dan Walker looks like a butter faced teenager in a middle aged man suit. F*** both of them. He comes across as furtive, uppity, detached from genuine warmth towards the missing woman. As in that video comparing him with Chris Watts, his eyes are beady and dark. Watts, too, didn't appear to give a damn about his wife - or kids for that matter. We know why. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LastOneLeftInTheCounty Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 54 minutes ago, Saved said: He comes across as furtive, uppity, detached from genuine warmth towards the missing woman. As in that video comparing him with Chris Watts, his eyes are beady and dark. Watts, too, didn't appear to give a damn about his wife - or kids for that matter. We know why. The whole thing could be a silent nudge to this old chestnut- the chipping and tracking of people- “we’d know where she was if she had this implant/chip etc” Implants won’t be acceptable for a long time but maybe this will be the first of many mysterious disappearances to silently nudge public opinion ??? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greatdayforfreedom Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 2 hours ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said: That Paul fella looked well creepy. The whole thing stinks. And Dan Walker looks like a butter faced teenager in a middle aged man suit. F*** both of them. I get really bad vibes coming from her husband. He gives off a dark energy. There is just something about him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.