greatdayforfreedom Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 If the family didn't want press intrusion and the public asking questions then they could have asked the media for a blackout on the story. Instead we got wall-to-wall press coverage. Why did it become such a behemoth of a story? 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 OK so the body has been confirmed to be that of Nicola Bulley. But don't expect this story to go away any time soon. Because there are still the questions of: 1) What happened? (was it an accident or was she murdered?) 2) Who did it? (if it was a murder) 3) Why? (again if it was murder) 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truthblast Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 33 minutes ago, greatdayforfreedom said: Another number 33. Video length is 3:03. Just a coincidence! Everything is a coincidence in the 21st Century... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saved Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 10 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said: OK so the body has been confirmed to be that of Nicola Bulley. But don't expect this story to go away any time soon. Because there are still the questions of: 1) What happened? (was it an accident or was she murdered?) 2) Who did it? (if it was a murder) 3) Why? (again if it was murder) It's going to rumble on for weeks and months. As far as the official family statement is concerned, Paul has finally been exonerated. I think a purging of individuals who have implied his involvement is imminent. Social media platforms will join in on the purge and find themselves implementing moves in line with the online harms bill. Folk shall be scared to question anything by the time they've finished. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 On 2/9/2023 at 8:24 PM, Macnamara said: i've been meaning to get into dowsing for years. You can dowse over a map to locate things or people Self-styled 'medium' reveals how he found Nicola Bulley's body and had been using his 'gift' to try and help in the search for the missing mother-of-two A body was found yesterday in the River Wyre. Body not yet identified as Nikki Extraordinary development tonight saw psychic Jason Rothwell come forward By Dan Sales and James Fielding and Andrew Chamberlain Published: 16:58 GMT, 20 February 2023 | Updated: 18:31 GMT, 20 February 2023 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11772723/Amateur-medium-body-hunt-missing-Nicola-Bulley.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted February 20 Author Share Posted February 20 The 3 banners at the bottom of BBC News have been on rotation on NB for a good 3 hours. Absolute BS. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperstarNeilC Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 (edited) 7 hours ago, DaleP said: Everyone is on about 23. What is the significant? it's the next number to 22 and one before 24.... *Bench number 23 *Body found day 23 *In the year 2023 //// //// //// Edited February 20 by SuperstarNeilC 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 30 minutes ago, Macnamara said: Self-styled 'medium' reveals how he found Nicola Bulley's body and had been using his 'gift' to try and help in the search for the missing mother-of-two A body was found yesterday in the River Wyre. Body not yet identified as Nikki Extraordinary development tonight saw psychic Jason Rothwell come forward By Dan Sales and James Fielding and Andrew Chamberlain Published: 16:58 GMT, 20 February 2023 | Updated: 18:31 GMT, 20 February 2023 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11772723/Amateur-medium-body-hunt-missing-Nicola-Bulley.html Well there you go, clearly it was a waste of public money to pay this "specialist diving team" to go looking in the river then. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said: Well there you go, clearly it was a waste of public money to pay this "specialist diving team" to go looking in the river then. jobs for the boys....depends on the strength of the current though doesn't it? also rivers can change their character depending on how much or little rain there has been but in a flowing river you would expect a person to float down stream a certain distance so where do you dive? You dive in a spot if you think the body is stationary no eg in a quarry or a canal or in a river where it might be snagged or weighted down? But in a river you wouldn't expect a body to be stationary....you'd expect it to flow with the river. Edited February 20 by Macnamara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 6 hours ago, DaleP said: Everyone is on about 23. What is the significant? it's the next number to 22 and one before 24.... two divided by three is .666 its a number many people can get obsessed by be glad you haven’t 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allymisfit Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 7 hours ago, DaleP said: I wasn't picking on you but what are you saying? I didn't even calculate what I was putting in the basket.... Aaah, sorry Dale. Misunderstanding. Did that really happen? If so, damn! I get stuff like this too..I can't understand why. Is it a language for us to tap into? I know that sounds weird. I do wonder though! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masonfreeparty2 Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 (edited) i remembered when andrew johnson did a talk at the static theatre in liverpool on 911 a few years ago..he did an interview with belinda mckenzie during the event and stood next to 23 the number on the building..always remembered asking him if no.23 was significant back then..usual suspects in attendance,miles johnson,joanna summerscales,david griffin,stephen bamber...its a proper mind fuck this conspiracy stuff ,why do they do it? coincidentally i was born on the 23rd and a 23 year if you add the digits Edited February 20 by masonfreeparty2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masonfreeparty2 Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 3 hours ago, Anthony81 said: Seriously have a word with yourself well there are enough working for GCHQ ..they get paid enough,i guess they all dont sit around all day in that round building,some go out on site visits to earn their crust 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfpavek1 Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 12 hours ago, rebornsteve said: I've already noted gematria links God has left the building with Nicola sturgeon same numbers. There will only be one ego left and so sturgeon is the ultimate ego and all others need to be taken out Mortgage advisor is GOD in plain sight and so Sturgeon is the rising star and so God leaves. 23is also significant Alex Jones is also linked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 2 hours ago, Truthblast said: Everything is a coincidence in the 21st Century... Biggest killers in the 21st century: 1. Climate change 2. Coincidences 3. Brief illnesses 4. Hotel Balcony windows 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 12 hours ago, rebornsteve said: NICOLA (Sturgeon) the BULL(e)Y is DEAD IN THE WATER. How blatant can it be. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfpavek1 Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 1 hour ago, SuperstarNeilC said: *Bench number 23 *Body found day 23 *In the year 2023 //// //// //// 2 3×6 2 *3 6 2*3 6 666 the devil sturgeon murdered god she has the same numbers as God has left the building in gematria Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saved Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 I won't post it here but I've just watched a video on YouTube that beggars belief. Some geezer is allowed to flounce past the police with a camera and then film an attempted extraction of the body from the water's edge. Two coppers are struggling to get the body up the steep bank, through tall reeds, with bare hands and no protective clothing or hazard masks. They seem to have wrapped the body in orangey yellow tarpaulin, as if that was the only thing to hand in the back of one of their cars. The video ends with them having got nowhere after six minutes of fumbling about. Lots in the comments have said they have reported the video but it seems to me that 'they' want us to see it for some reason. Unbelievable. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluke Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 10 hours ago, Dagon44 said: Apart from the reeds obviously searchers don’t look in reeds. This is the genius my dad was making me watch I remember a few days after she went missing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saved Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 52 minutes ago, Fluke said: This is the genius my dad was making me watch I remember a few days after she went missing. Every new day there's an unbelievable revelation of incompetence that trumps the previous day's effort. I cannot believe that this is not deliberate. I'm convinced that the whole story has been designed to force people to comment out of sheer exasperation. The more people that do that, the more 'speculation' is going to fill social media as people voice their frustrations, which in turn can be used as justification for an iron fist approach to online speech. Where that hasn't happened enough I'm sure the 77th could say some vicious things. They could dub the first wave of censorship as Nicola's Law in honour of her memory - like light out of darkness; the darkness being the false accusations thrown at poor Paul and Emma. 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 3 hours ago, allymisfit said: Aaah, sorry Dale. Misunderstanding. Did that really happen? If so, damn! I get stuff like this too..I can't understand why. Is it a language for us to tap into? I know that sounds weird. I do wonder though! Yeah it reallyy happened. I was like wtf?! I would say, normally if you are obsessed about something..... a red car you want to buy, pregnancy or even 666, you tend to manifest this in the outer world. But, I am not obsessing about any number. I believe in the power to a point but not really giving that much of importance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 (edited) 3 hours ago, SuperstarNeilC said: *Bench number 23 *Body found day 23 *In the year 2023 //// //// //// What?! There is a movie about 23? I know a few people in the forum who might think the movie is about them. So what does it mean if you have your birthday add upto 23? Enigma or disaster? Edited February 21 by DaleP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 2 hours ago, masonfreeparty2 said: well there are enough working for GCHQ ..they get paid enough,i guess they all dont sit around all day in that round building,some go out on site visits to earn their crust When you say 'enough', like how many? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 6 minutes ago, DaleP said: What?! There is a movie about 23? I know a few people in the forum who might think the movie is about them. Carey was obsessed about it back in the day; after then the demonic glamour was all 11:11 Now the archons completely rule at will 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 7 hours ago, Velma said: How long does it take? She had a very distinctive front tooth! Clearly photoshopped 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.