Your Attitude Towards Vaxxed People

[Michi713]

Hello all.  Hoping some chatty people will respond honestly to this question:

 

How do you feel towards the vaccinated at this point in the game?
 

Love, hate, resentment, forgiveness, pity, superiority, etc.  

 

No right or wrong answers here.  Just honesty if you please.

 

Personally, I don't know what to feel.  I toggle between, anger and sympathy mostly.  Anger at myself that I wasn't loud about warning people.  I just observed them and was more concerned with protecting my kid.  

[Anti Facts Sir]

Depends.

 

Anyone who outright called for the demonisation of the "un-vaxxed" or the "anti-vaxxers" has nothing but my contempt.

 

Those who were stupid enough to fall for this fear porn and had it so "life could return to normal" have my pity. I don't wanna be around them.

 

For me, it really isn't a case of being better than others. It never was. It was simply a case of doing the right or wrong thing for your body, and your soul. Take the jab and fuck yourself up...for what? Or have some smarts and think it through and keep yourself intact. It was a con and I wanted as many people to see through it as possible.

 

[The All Eye]

My wife has the vax, however, she has never pushed it on anyone, and is of the belief that it's your body, do what you want.  I have contempt for those who pushed the vax on others, made them loose jobs, friends, family, etc.  No sympathy for asshole pro-vaxxers.  

[Michi713]

Thanks for your replies.

I'm a little scared of folks after seeing how they acted.  The thin veil of society was lifted and there was just fear and aggression underneath.  2021 was getting hairy.
 

Now I wonder how many of those aggressive types (who are not dead or disabled) would act the same next time.  

 

Edited February 2 by Michi713

[Anti Facts Sir]

Yeah the sheer hatred - motivated by fear, and ignorant trust in "the science" - sure as hell showed who is going to bow to the PTB whenever the shit hits the fan. We saw who had genuine kindness in them, and who were little more than NPCs.

 

Far far more than I ever imagined. But look at them now.

 

Either dead, disfigured, disabled or ridden with regret and a new kind of fear. Fear that they fucked themselves up for nothing.

 

[Michi713]

9 minutes ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

Either dead, disfigured, disabled or ridden with regret and a new kind of fear. Fear that they fucked themselves up for nothing.

 

I can't imagine the feeling of knowing something is in you that could kill you at any moment.  I bet some are afraid to exercise for fear of a cardiac event.  I can probably score a stationary bike for cheap right now.  

So if the Johns Hopkins SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028 scenario was in fact talking about 2020 instead...

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2017/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf

 

the final play by the media will be to frame the vaccinated as heroes who sacrificed for the greater good, and empathize with them.  I have the utmost faith that the media will pull that off and subdue populations by appealing to their pride.

[Mikheil]

I hope every one of them dies. And the ones who stirred up hate again the anti-injections should have a special slow, agonizing fucking death.

 

It would certainly clean the gene pool and these morons wouldn't be breeding and brainwashing more morons.

 

We should PUBLICLY hang every doctor who supported this bullshit. Not by a quick drop, but haul the cunt up and watch him choke to death.

 

The 'scientists' and politicians who started this should be burned at the stake. A fitting end for their fucking witchcraft.

 

Do I have sympathy for the mutilated and dying from 'The Jab' they were so eager to take? NOT A SINGLE DROP. Morons shouldn't be allowed to live and breed. 

[peter]

8 hours ago, Michi713 said:

Hello all.  Hoping some chatty people will respond honestly to this question:

 

How do you feel towards the vaccinated at this point in the game?
 

Love, hate, resentment, forgiveness, pity, superiority, etc.  

 

No right or wrong answers here.  Just honesty if you please.

 

Personally, I don't know what to feel.  I toggle between, anger and sympathy mostly.  Anger at myself that I wasn't loud about warning people.  I just observed them and was more concerned with protecting my kid.  

To be honest I don't think about them one way or another,just like I don't think about un-vaxed people either

[Saved]

14 hours ago, Michi713 said:

Hello all.  Hoping some chatty people will respond honestly to this question:

 

How do you feel towards the vaccinated at this point in the game?
 

Love, hate, resentment, forgiveness, pity, superiority, etc.  

 

No right or wrong answers here.  Just honesty if you please.

 

Personally, I don't know what to feel.  I toggle between, anger and sympathy mostly.  Anger at myself that I wasn't loud about warning people.  I just observed them and was more concerned with protecting my kid.  

In my experience it depends on the person in question.

 

I know a few who have dug their heels in and are resentful of people like me - that I had openly warned many times prior to them being jabbed. I know others who are regretful and in fear for their futures. There are others, still, who are not only deeply regretful but stopped after one jab and are now staunchly against jabs having had their eyes opened to the whole sorry scam.

 

When a person who dies suddenly aged 50 - having called 'antivaxers' wicked or cowards - I cannot find any compassion for them due to their overt complicity in a deadly lie.

 

That is different to the person who took the jabs under duress, was never a cheerleader and genuinely did what they did for the sake of their families as the only wage earners. It is also different for 89 year old Irene who has never been on the internet in her life and is terrified because of what she heard on the television daily for over a year.

 

I was as loud as I could be, took a lot of stick and still do. But then I'm a Christian and so am used to that. I am also used to forgiving people who don't deserve it, just as I have been forgiven. However, I can also be an arse who sometimes gets proud and wants instant judgement for worst offenders.

 

Of course, wicked people will wax worse if unrepentant - hardening their own hearts in the process - but it would be better for everybody if the worst offenders had an epiphany, told the absolute truth that they knew they were participating in genocide, whilst accepting their impending death for such crimes. 

 

Deliberate deceivers don't get any compassion from me until there is real repentance with real fruit in keeping with it. I'll also add that anybody who knowingly harms a child is reprehensible.

 

Though I have forgiven them, the most personal offence that touched me was the fear of man in my former fellowship - the polar opposite to what they preached. Nobody took my warnings seriously and the worst example of behaviour towards me was one woman saying the following to my wife on hearing that we were splitting:

 

"Now he's gone you and the kids can get vaccinated"

 

God won't permit me to stay angry but I do give myself room to occasionally rage and swear. I do also occasionally fantasize that God Himself causes them all to see so that I can be vindicated and apologised to in contrite and genuine tears of sorrow at how they treated me.

 

But that's the flesh talking, in which no good thing resides. 

 

There is a paradox regarding the 500 that I used to fellowship with. On the one hand I have prayed that God would keep them safe from vax damage. On the other hand, I am certain that they will carry on taking jabs for whatever is released next - unless a sizeable amount of them start suffering from clots, rapid cancers and serious heart issues.

 

This is a good thread idea because I can revisit what I've just written when not in a good place.

 

 

[LastOneLeftInTheCounty]

The vax pushers? Fuck em!

 

Everyone else who took it? Pity. 
 

The ones I warned not to? Smugness. 
 

The anti vaxxers? Pride. 

[peter]

9 hours ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

The vax pushers? Fuck em!

 

Everyone else who took it? Pity. 
 

The ones I warned not to? Smugness. 
 

The anti vaxxers? Pride. 

I think the term anti vaxxer is rather misleading, personally I'm not an anti vaxxer ,I'm an anti unpaid lab rat

Edited February 4 by peter

[LastOneLeftInTheCounty]

Anti bio weapon experimentee? 

[Certified Green of Heart]

Anti - lemon sucking Bill Gates!....

Only a lemon could wash his mouth out anywhere near satisfactorily plus A TON of bicarbonate soda (with EXTRA++ added poison for good measure for him)
Anti-Power-Hungry-Rail-Roading-Filthy-Liar-Condescending-Media-Whores-&-Fake-News-Fake-Vax-Nano-Tech-Pill-Popping-NWO-Pushers....

That will cover it for now..... but I LIKE being ANTI VAXXER by that name... Sod what Vaxxers think about it.... They know shit. and therefore just assume an anti-vaxxer is trouble, they need to **grow a brain**... and in that brain A CONSCIENCE capable of independent thinking, and cancelling out blind trust in any form of authority or big business.

 

How I feel about Vaxxers.... Like Saved said, also depends on their attitude.  

The ones that had a job they wanted to keep even more badly than respecting their own bodies and PERHAPS knew something was up, but went and got the jab, because they would get effected CAREER WISE (oh dear!!) by not taking the vaccine probably (in the majority of cases I would guess) have no soul anyway many of them...

Edited February 4 by Certified Green of Heart

[Macnamara]

i can forgive people who acted in good faith and got fooled

 

but what concerns me is where we all go from here

 

none of us are going to be safe until the psychopaths hands are taken off the steering wheel of society and my concern is that i don't see an upswell of outrage from the vaxxed

 

this leaves me worried that they are suffering some sort of stockholm syndrome and that if the cabal pull this whole scamdemic trick again with for example avian flu the vaxxed will simply fall into line again. I also worry that none of them will stand up for the rights of the unjabbed to have a choice over their bodily integrity

 

If the jabbed want to seek justice with the rest of us then we should embrace them but my worry is that many of them for some strange quirk of human psychology that i don't understand are going to simply double down on their belligerant hostility towards those of us who don't blindly obey authority

[Campion]

2 hours ago, Macnamara said:

i can forgive people who acted in good faith and got fooled

 

If the jabbed want to seek justice with the rest of us then we should embrace them but my worry is that many of them for some strange quirk of human psychology that i don't understand are going to simply double down on their belligerant hostility towards those of us who don't blindly obey authority

 

As a jabbed person myself (tho stopped now) I don't think most people realise yet that they have been fooled. They're more likely to buy into some story along the lines that mistakes were made because the scientific research was rushed through and political decisions made on early preliminary results. 

 

The problem is that few of us are well educated in this area of medicine. We can't very well do our own research, we likely can't even understand the research papers written by scientists so the alternative is to place belief in external authority. Whether it's the mainstream media, spokesmen & women, politicians or alternative sources of information. We can't find out directly for ourselves so we need to look indirectly and read or listen to someone else to get opinions. That is, put them in a position of authority (trusted authorship). And this is above all a war of trust, who do we trust with truthful information? 

Edited February 4 by Campion

[Macnamara]

2 minutes ago, Campion said:

 We can't very well do our own research

 

i'm not sure i agree with that. I think that medical studies ARE readable to a certain extent

 

can you read a medical study that finds that aluminium injected into human muscle will elicit an immune response that can see the aluminium swallowed up by macrophages and carried over the blood brain barrier?

 

yes

 

can you actually repeat the experiment yourself and see the process at work? likely not

[spideysensei]

I'm extremely frustrated with them, for the most part. They are "numpties", to coin Ronnie O'Sullivan's phrase about mediocre snooker players. Like Steve Davis reminded him, from his vantage point he's head and shoulders above everyone else and a bit of humility is needed.

 

It's very similar with us, for some reason the conditioning didn't take root and we saw through the lies from day 1, so practically every day the past few years this has cropped up in my head and i try to remind myself to be humble. I am becoming more Christian since the NWO exposed itself. Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall.
 

[Campion]

18 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

can you actually repeat the experiment yourself and see the process at work? likely not

 

That's what I'm getting at Mac. I don't have a lab in my spare room, or the training to do my own research. If I pick up the original research paper of someone else, whom I choose to trust, it'll likely be written in technical jargon that's impenetrable to me. Although I have studied statistics so I might be able to follow the numerical analysis to some extent. Generally speaking we read the simplified laypersons version, or a reporter's second-hand version, so it's difficult to do our own analysis and evaluation, rather than simply believe what we're being told. But not impossible if we put in the time and effort. 

Edited February 4 by Campion

[LastOneLeftInTheCounty]

30 minutes ago, Campion said:

 

As a jabbed person myself (tho stopped now) I don't think most people realise yet that they have been fooled. They're more likely to buy into some story along the lines that mistakes were made because the scientific research was rushed through and political decisions made on early preliminary results. 

 

The problem is that few of us are well educated in this area of medicine. We can't very well do our own research, we likely can't even understand the research papers written by scientists so the alternative is to place belief in external authority. Whether it's the mainstream media, spokesmen & women, politicians or alternative sources of information. We can't find out directly for ourselves so we need to look indirectly and read or listen to someone else to get opinions. That is, put them in a position of authority (trusted authorship). And this is above all a war of trust, who do we trust with truthful information? 

Hi, just out of interest- you said you were jabbed, how are you feeling? Have you felt unwell or had any common symptoms that other people complain about? Will understand if you don’t want to answer my question, thanks 

[Macnamara]

6 minutes ago, Campion said:

 

That's what I'm getting at Mac. I don't have a lab in my spare room, or the training to do my own research. If I pick up the original research paper of someone else, whom I choose to trust, it'll likely be written in technical jargon that's impenetrable to me. Although I have studied statistics so I might be able to follow the numerical analysis to some extent. Generally speaking we read the simplified laypersons version, or a reporter's second-hand version, so it's difficult to do our own analysis and evaluation, rather than simply believe what we're being told. But not impossible if we put in the time and effort. 

 

the science on vaccines is strong around aluminium. Maybe have a read of these notes below. See if it's impossible to grasp. Medical studies are provided which can be looked up. Are they really so inaccessible? do you think your GP who spends ONE DAY at medical school learning about vaccines is so much better equipped to look at those studies then you?

 

Aluminium in the vaccines

 

''Vaccine industry money has neutralized virtually all of the checks and balances that once stood between a rapacious pharmaceutical industry and our children''

-Robert F, Kennedy Jr

 

I have borrowed the following information which came from three presentations by Dr Suzanne Humphries who has some very interesting things to say about vaccines. I strongly recommend that anyone who cares about their health or the health of loved ones watches the presentations.

I will post medical studies and the reference numbers so that you can look them up on pubmed.com if you want to check them out for yourself

Aluminium is used as an 'adjuvant' in many vaccines which is to say that it is used to provoke an immune response in your body.

When it is said to many doctors that aluminium is harmful to the body they will often answer that your body receives far more aluminium through food then it does through vaccines however your body reacts differently to aluminium when it enters the body through intramuscular injections as opposed to being ingested.

When aluminium is ingested much of it is excreted from the body in stools and urine but when it is injected into muscle it provokes a response from the immune system.

When it is injected into muscle, such as in a vaccine, aluminium is eaten up by macrophages which then carry it across the blood brain barrier. Once inside the brain it is able to make epigenetic alterations to the functions of genes. This can then create unintended consequences known as ‘non-specific effects’.

 

Your General Practitioner will not be able to tell you what epigenetic effects aluminium will have on the genes of the person vaccinated, neither will they be able to tell you of any non-specific effects that may occur as a result of that because they are not a geneticist or a toxicologist or a virologist, therefore they are not experts on vaccines; they simply do as they are told by the government and big pharma or they risk losing their job

 

The focus of the vaccine industry research has been on whether or not their vaccines produce the desired result for example a polio vaccine combatting polio. They have not carried out extensive research on the wider consequences of vaccines caused by ingredients such as aluminium and the non-specific effects it causes

‘Aluminium is extremely proinflammatory, pathalogical and a genotoxic element that is particularly deleterious to the normal homeostatic operation of brain cells, especially at the level of normal cytoplasmic and genetic activities that utilize phosphate’- Bhattarcharjee 2013 PMID 23764827.

There is a lot of phosphate utilisation in the brain and aluminium has been found to be a neurotoxin at vaccine relevant doses (see Shaw 2013 PMID 23932735).

A new study has shown that the brain is not immunologically separate from the rest of the body as previously assumed (see Louveau 2015 PMID 26030524). This finding will require an entirely new look at brain function from the medical fraternity and the latest thought on vaccine function may not be up to date with this latest research.

The reasoning for this is that concentrations of aluminium have been found to increase as the arteries get closer to the brain (Battarcharjee). This is because aluminium is attracted to the brain and is carried across the blood brain barrier by macrophages.

There is currently a lack of comparable studies comparing non-vaccinated children with vaccinated children to establish what non-specific effects may be caused by vaccines, and by some estimates as many as half the paediatric vaccinations include aluminium.

 

When adverse reactions to vaccines do occur they are often difficult to link to the vaccines because sometimes it takes time for those adverse effects to manifest; see for example Hamza 2012 PMID 21601704 where it took four months for the adverse effects, including subtle liver damage, to fully manifest in the test subjects.

Aluminium received into the body through intra-muscular injection of a vaccine is not comparable to aluminium ingested, for example through food, in terms of how it impacts the body because intra-muscular injection of aluminium stimulates a response from the immune system. According to studies, some known effects of aluminium passed into the body through intra-muscular injection include:

-Translocates from the muscle to the brain
-Is attracted to the brain and accumulates there. It increases brain inflammation and activates brain microglia (Alexandrov 2015 PMID 26265215 & Bhattacharjee 2013 PMID 23764827)
-Passes through the blood brain barrier inside macrophages (Banks 1983 PMID 6139573)
-In Bank’s study cited above the blood brain barrier became very permeable after the injections of aluminium
-Enters the brain and epigenetically alters gene function; it changes how DNA functions by affecting which genes are opened and which are closed (Hamza 2012 PMID 21601704)
-Is a neurotoxin at vaccine relevant doses (Shaw 2013 PMID 23932735)

 

-Changes how enzymes work, because enzymes need to be the right shape to work and aluminium can change that (Shaw 2013 PMID 23932735)
-Stimulates a response from the immune system (it forces it to over-react)
-Can go into the lymph nodes
-Can react with our proteins
-Harms cell function (it damages cell membranes and myelin and disrupts the ability of cells to regulate and to communicate with each other)
-Has an inflammatory effect
-Enters our T-cells which is what our body uses to fight infection
-Accumulates in the body for years at a time (Shaw/Tomjilenovic 2013 PMID 23932735)
-Binds to nucleotides (i.e. genetic material in the nucleus) and changes how they work (see Kawahara 2011 PMID: 21423554)
-It creates a bias towards Th2 which then affects how our immune system functions and deals with future infections (well published, numerous articles on this)
-It induces autoimmune reactions (Shaw 2014 PMID 25349607)
-It blocks neuronal signalling
-Is an antigen on its own (Levy 1998 PMID 9629674)
-Impairs cognitive and motor functions

 

If someone says that the doses of aluminium in vaccines are too small to be harmful then correct them and inform them that aluminium has been found to be a neurotoxin at vaccine relevant doses, see: Shaw 2013 PMID 23932735.

When we speak about ‘minimal risk levels’ for aluminium in the body we must consider that no studies have been carried out using a control of non-vaccinated children and therefore it is not possible to establish safe levels of aluminium exposure.

Another area of concern should be the discovery of endogenous retroviruses in vaccines and the long-term health implications of that for people who have been vaccinated:

‘Manufacture of childhood vaccines in human fetal cell lines, with its associated retroviral and human DNA fragment contaminants, fulfills all of the necessary requirements as a primary trigger for autism disorder’
-Dr Theresa Deisher 2014, Impact of Environmental Factors on the Prevalence of Autistic Disorder After 1979, Sept 2014, J Pub Health Epid Vol 6(9), 271-284

When we consider the role of environmental factors in health it is important to keep in mind that what our genes are exposed to affects their function, and aluminium in vaccines affects gene function.

In the same way that Thimerosol (a mercury derivative used in vaccines as a preservative) has been removed in recent years from many vaccines over health fears (but not the flu vaccine), it is very possible that aluminium will also be removed in the near future as more research is conducted into the non-specific effects it has on the human body. However this will be of no help to any children already vaccinated with vaccines containing aluminium (hydroxide and phosphate).

 

The following are four studies Dr Humphries recommends that parents familiarise themselves with. It is easy to go on pubmed.com and type in the reference number and pull up the study

The studies can sometimes be a dense read but Dr Humphries says they will reward the effort; they cover a range of problems caused by aluminium entering the body through intra-muscular injection:

-Verstraeten 1997 PMID 9264541
-Kawahara 2011 PMID 21423554 – link between aluminium and the pathogenesis of Alzheimers disease: The integration of the aluminium and amyloid cascade hypotheses
-Exley 2013 PMID 23982047 – Human exposure to aluminium
-Shaw 2014 PMID 25349607 – Aluminium induced entropy in biological systems: implications for neurological disease

Another good website to check out is vaccinepapers.org which has a brochure that contains many medical studies that cover the effects that aluminium has when injected into the human body; see here: http://vaccinepapers.org/brochure/

 

 

[Macnamara]

Second part of Aluminium in vaccines...

 

Doctors are afraid to speak out:

 

''In my opinion, the biggest obstacle to independent research and thinking is the professional consequence of stepping out of line and being seen to be different—as I know to my cost. As George Bernard Shaw says in his preface to “The Doctor’s Dilemma” 1906:
Doctors are just like other Englishmen: most of them have no honour and no conscience: what they commonly mistake for these is sentimentality and an intense dread of doing anything that everybody else does not do, or omitting to do anything that everybody else does.
So next time you are in your doctor’s office and you say, “I’m worried about the safety of vaccination,” and you are told, “You don’t understand, you’re not a doctor . . .” remember that, if you are a doctor and say, “I’m worried about the safety of vaccination,” you will be told, “We’re charging you with serious professional misconduct . . .”
-Dr. Jayne L. M. Donegan, MBBS, DRCOG, DFFP, DCH, MRCGP, MFHom

 

Dementia now leading cause of death
14 November 2016
Dementia, including Alzheimer's disease, has overtaken heart disease as the leading cause of death in England and Wales, latest figures reveal. Last year, more than 61,000 people died of dementia - 11.6% of all recorded deaths.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-37972141

Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2011; 2011: 276393.
Published online 2011 Mar 8. doi: 10.4061/2011/276393
PMCID: PMC3056430
PMID: 21423554
Link between Aluminum and the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease: The Integration of the Aluminum and Amyloid Cascade Hypotheses
Masahiro Kawahara1,* and Midori Kato-Negishi2
Despite it's environmental abundance, Al is not an essential element for living organisms, and no enzymatic reaction requires Al. Al is reported to influence more than 200 biologically important reactions and to cause various adverse effects on the mammalian central nervous system (CNS) (Table 1). These include crucial reactions for brain development such as the axonal transport, neurotransmitter synthesis, synaptic transmission, phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of proteins, protein degradation, gene expression, and inflammatory responses.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056430/

 

Is exposure to aluminium adjuvants associated with social impairments in mice? A pilot study
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...62013417304749

Aluminium in brain tissue in autism
Autism spectrum disorder is a neurodevelopmental disorder of unknown aetiology. It is suggested to involve both genetic susceptibility and environmental factors including in the latter environmental toxins. Human exposure to the environmental toxin aluminium has been linked, if tentatively, to autism spectrum disorder. Herein we have used transversely heated graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry to measure, for the first time, the aluminium content of brain tissue from donors with a diagnosis of autism. We have also used an aluminium-selective fluor to identify aluminium in brain tissue using fluorescence microscopy. The aluminium content of brain tissue in autism was consistently high.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...46672X17308763

Injected aluminium found to cause massive damage to the motor neurons of mice:
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...n_degeneration

 

 

[Macnamara]

Dr Suzanne Humphries - Aluminium Found In Vaccines Is Toxic To ALL Life Forms

https://www.bitchute.com/video/d7zpBXsWBn2W/

[Campion]

19 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

the science on vaccines is strong around aluminium. Maybe have a read of these notes below. See if it's impossible to grasp. Medical studies are provided which can be looked up. Are they really so inaccessible? do you think your GP who spends ONE DAY at medical school learning about vaccines is so much better equipped to look at those studies then you?

 

Thanks, I'll have a read. Looks good stuff. First impressions of the text is that it's a list of conclusions which I'll need to trace back through the audit trail (so to speak) of actual evidence if I'm going to evaluate it myself, as if I'm a peer reviewer. 

 

I'm lucky to have had a degree level education in scientific subjects (but not medicine), so I'm not the average jabbee who would rather believe the labcoats uncritically. 

 

But I'm aware as I'm sure others here are too, that something doesn't deserve any more credibility just because it's a conspiracy theory. There's plenty of people in our establishment churning out misinformation propaganda to manipulate our beliefs and loyalties. At the same time as persecuting genuine conspiracy researchers. 

[Campion]

1 hour ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

Hi, just out of interest- you said you were jabbed, how are you feeling? Have you felt unwell or had any common symptoms that other people complain about? Will understand if you don’t want to answer my question, thanks 

 

I'm fine thanks, my health is about average for someone my age (middle age). I have some chronic long-term symptoms such as anxiety and brain fog, which I don't think have got worse since being jabbed. If it's confession time, I could do with a general detox of junk food, cut back a bit on the booze, drink more clean water and get more exercise and meditation. in other words, like most people's new year's resolutions lol! 

 

Before I started reading about covid jabs and becoming sceptical, my reasoning was that there's loads of other vaxes, other injections, drugs and medical treatments which I've had, so why distrust this one more than any other? If the govt wants to roll out a secret poison to us, there must be easier ways out of the glare of all the publicity around covid. Now I think there are other eugenic experiments going on which we don't know about because there's not such a spotlight. 

 

For what it's worth, I think covid is like another  type of flu which has been blown out of proportion for various agendas, not least financial. I did get covid, not long after having the jab and it felt like flu. The fact that I got it after the jab when I was supposed to be protected, was what started me questioning the whole thing: something didn't add up. 

 

Edited February 4 by Campion

[LastOneLeftInTheCounty]

10 minutes ago, Campion said:

 

I'm fine thanks, my health is about average for someone my age (middle age). I have some chronic long-term symptoms such as anxiety and brain fog, which I don't think have got worse since being jabbed. If it's confession time, I could do with a general detox of junk food, cut back a bit on the booze, drink more clean water and get more exercise and meditation. in other words, like most people's new year's resolutions lol! 

 

Before I started reading about covid jabs and becoming sceptical, my reasoning was that there's loads of other vaxes, other injections, drugs and medical treatments which I've had, so why distrust this one more than any other? If the govt wants to roll out a secret poison to us, there must be easier ways out of the glare of all the publicity around covid. Now I think there are other eugenic experiments going on which we don't know about because there's not such a spotlight. 

 

For what it's worth, I think covid is like another  type of flu which has been blown out of proportion for various agendas, not least financial. I did get covid, not long after having the jab and it felt like flu. The fact that I got it after the jab when I was supposed to be protected, was what started me questioning the whole thing: something didn't add up. 

 

Right, that’s understandable, sometimes we just make what we feel is the right decision. At least you don’t have lingering problems from it.
Having a scientific background do you have any theories about the other eugenics programmes that might be running right now?