Jump to content

Concerning the claim Hitler/NSDAP was financed by international finance and their puppet/agent


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

I'm not sure what Anglo folk are in power, normal Anglos that aren't zios or some knd of greedy bankers anyway.

 

The hidden parasite fronting a people to take the blame perhaps, 👍

Edit

Remeber liz truss, yeah me neither, but she stated that she is a HUUUUUUUUUGE zionist

Recently joe stalin bioden said the same

Edited by sock muppet
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, sock muppet said:

 

The hidden parasite fronting a people to take the blame perhaps, 👍

 

If you're implying that some Germanic people that got invaded in 1066, that will become a minority in 2066, are creating an Abrahamic world order where everyone scapegoats Anglos, and their European brothers Rome, and by extension the West, then no I don't believe that.
 

That being said, I do believe that TPTB have mixed with Anglo stock, just like they have mixed with most groups.

 

It could just be a total deflection as well, the Anglo-Saxons only account for 10 to 40 per cent of the DNA in half of modern-day Britons.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22530134-300-ancient-invaders-transformed-britain-but-not-its-dna/

 

I don't think the parasite is hidden either. They seem pretty open and mask off.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

When Russians talk about Anglos, they don't always just mean literal Anglo-Saxon stock (although they often do), they also mean the Anglosphere.

 

it's not an 'anglosphere'

 

the anglos were invaded by the normans in 1066 who brought in jewish administrators who then set up 'the exchequer' taxation system and they audited the belongings of everyone in the country which was called the doomsday book so that they knew who they could squeeze and how hard

 

nothing has really changed since

 

it should be called the sabbatean-jewish sphere and i suggest that russia is also within that sphere even though they pretend not to be

 

the chinese-russian BRICS world order traces back to the same goldsman sachs bankers that run 'the west'

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Macnamara said:

it should be called the sabbatean-jewish sphere and i suggest that russia is also within that sphere even though they pretend not to be

 

the chinese-russian BRICS world order traces back to the same goldsman sachs bankers that run 'the west'

Phony Opposition: The Truth About the BRICS

Broc West08/19/2015

via Devon Douglas-Bowers  hamptoninstitution.org

This is a transcript of a recent email interview conducted between Devon Douglas-Brewers and independent journalist James Corbett, where they discuss BRICS, the view that many have of the organization as a resistance force and the truth behind that. The conversation ends with how we can fight back against The Powers That Be in our own way.

DEVON DOUGLAS-BOWERS: What are BRICS (an international financial alliance involving Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AAIB) really about? Many people argue that it is these countries challenging the dominant US-based system. How is that true or not true in some respects?

JAMES CORBETT: Who is contending that the AIIB or the BRICS' New Development Bank is in any way competitive with the Bretton Woods institutions (IMF/World Bank)? Certainly not anyone involved with any of these institutions.

In March, IMF chief Christine Lagarde pledged IMF cooperation with the AIIB.

In June, World Bank chief Jim Yong Kim issued a statement congratulating the AIIB on its formation and calling it an "important new partner" for the Washington-led development bank.

In July, NDB [New Development Bank] President K.V. Kamath returned the favor, conceding that the NDB and the IMF/World Bank are complementary institutions, not rivals.

Also in July, the AIIB and the World Bank signed an actual cooperation agreement, promising to identify projects for joint financing later this fall.

Paulo Batista, BRICS bank VP and IMF Executive Director

Paulo Batista, BRICS bank VP and IMF Executive Director

No, these institutions do not view themselves as competitive. It is only various media pundits who have speculated that these new banks are in fact some sort of challenge to the so-called "Washington consensus." What none of these experts has bothered to report (for obvious reasons) is the remarkable fact that the Vice President of the NDB is also an Executive Board member of the IMF, who then went on to pledge cooperation and joint action between the NDB and IMF. Also missing from this narrative is the fact that the NDB's chief, Kundapur Vaman Kamath, is a former staffer of the supposed NDB "rival" Asia Development Bank. Or there's Jin Liqun, widely tipped to be the head of the AIIB, who also happens to be a former Vice President of the Asia Development Bank and alternative Executive Director of the World Bank.

In fact, the only sign that these Beijing-backed development banks pose any challenge to the existing order whatsoever is that the NDB has already confirmed that their first loan will be denominated in yuan, not dollars, and the AIIB is considering a basket of currencies, including the yuan.

But even this is not as much of a challenge to the Bretton Woods institutions as it appears at first glance. Although Beijing is obviously seeking to bolster the yuan as an international settlement currency, this is not being done in an effort to make the yuan itself a world reserve currency in the same way that the dollar is today. Instead, this is being done in service of a policy goal outlined by People's Bank of China Governor Zhou Xiaochuan in 2009 that is seeking to establish the "Special Drawing Rights" currency basket as the new world reserve currency.

China's goal is to have the yuan included in the SDR basket along with the dollar, yen, euro and pound. But the SDR itself is issued and administered by the IMF so once again we see that Beijing is not seeking to undermine these US-led hegemonic institutions at all, merely to increase their status and clout within these institutions.


DEVON DOUGLAS-BOWERS: Are there any cracks in BRICS, as in problems and disputes between member nations?

JAMES CORBETT: It would almost be better to ask if there are any points of accord between the BRICS nations other than occasional alignment of bilateral trade or security goals.

Meet Goldman Sachs, creator of the BRIC

Meet Goldman Sachs, creator of the BRIC

The idea that there is any such thing as a shared BRICS economic, military or foreign policy is part of the fundamental fraud of the "BRICS" idea itself. The truth is that the BRICS (formerly "BRIC") are not a coherent or organic grouping of like-minded states at all, but an arbitrary grouping of economies first identified by Goldman Sachs as emerging economies who were all expected to outperform the developed world in the coming decades. It was the BRIC countries that took this Goldman Sachs concept and attempted to make it into a real-world political reality, and the ploy becomes even more obvious when one realizes that the "S" (South Africa) was added not for any rational economic or political reason, but primarily to give the organization a footing in another continent.

China and India were at war in 1962 and have suffered through decades of tense relations. Even as late as 2006 Indian parliamentarians were openly urging a harder line on ongoing border disputes between the two countries, and border issues continue to this very day, with a tense military standoff in the disputed border region occurring last year, over a decade after the BRIC's inception.

China and Russia likewise share their traditional rivalries. Ever since the Sino-Soviet split in 1960, the two countries have been famously distrustful of each other. They have competing security and economic interests in places like Central Asia, where Putin is trying to construct his Eurasian Economic Union and Xi is attempting to solidify his New Silk Road. The fact that China, the world's largest energy importer, and Russia, the world's largest natural gas exporter, have only just now completed a pipeline agreement shows the degree to which their warming economic relations are a matter of political expediency, not mutual trust.

Brazil has enjoyed a close trading relationship with China in recent years, but even so Brazil has joined fellow BRICS member India in openly criticizing Beijing for its foot-dragging on yuan appreciation.

bricspianoBrazil, India and South Africa have attempted to create closer relations in recent years through mechanisms like the IBSA Dialogue as part of the "South-South Policy," but the very fact that they are seeking to expand cooperation through alternative dialogues and fora show the ineffectiveness of the BRICS to address these issues within the BRICS framework.

The BRICS are an artificial creation of a US investment bank, and the glacial pace at which the organization moves and the constant internal jockeying for status and position (see deliberations over where to locate the NDB, for example) show that it is little more than an afterthought in these countries' economic and foreign policies.

DEVON DOUGLAS-BOWERS: 
Are there any ways in which the interests of countries like Russia and China align with the interests of the US? What do you make of this cooperation on one front, while they disagree and fight on another front?

JAMES CORBETT: I think the problem with thinking of international relations this way is that it presupposes that the people in positions of political power and financial influence are interested in vague concepts of "national interest" rather than in the preservation and expansion of their own power and influence and that of their colleagues and associates.

As insiders like David Rothkopf and others have shown in recent years, there is a "Superclass" of several thousand individuals in positions of influence who have the ability to act transnationally and who actively do so in the pursuit of their own international relation and economic policy goals. Seen from within this framework, a billionaire financier from one country with global assets to protect has demonstrably more in common with a billionaire financier from another country with global assets to protect than he does a poor manual laborer from his own country.

Consequently, global political and economic relations are more fruitfully seen as a mishmash of sometimes rivalrous, sometimes complementary interests of various multinational banks and corporations and the various think tanks and international institutions they control. Although there may be greater points of accord and room for cooperation between elite oligarchs who share a language, history, culture or geographical location, it by no means rules out cooperation with others, even in countries that are nominally suffering through poor relations.

rozneftbpThus, what does it even mean to ask whether the interests of "Russia" and "China" align with the interests of the "US"? Surely these nation-state entities do not have interests in and of themselves. The people in positions of power in those countries have interests, but we would be better served in narrowing the scope of the question by identifying them in particular. Do the interests of Gazprom and Rosneft align with the interests of BP or Royal Dutch Shell? Sometimes, in certain contexts, yes. In other contexts they would be rivals.

Similarly with JPMorgan and HSBC and the Bank of China, or the various central bankers at the Bank for International Settlements, or the members of the Trilateral Commission. Their deliberations have very little to do with amorphous national interests and everything to do with jockeying for personal position and control of the global economic and political chessboard.

DEVON DOUGLAS-BOWERS: Why do you think that people buy into this narrative that countries like Russia and China are a "resistance" force?

JAMES CORBETT: We have been conditioned our entire lives to expect that anything that opposes a demonstrably evil entity must itself be good. Whether it be the Star Wars Rebel Alliance fighting the Galactic Empire or the heroic Allies fighting the villainous Axis or even the more nuanced case of a valiant Serpico fighting the corruption within his own NYPD, we are almost invariably given narratives with identifiable "good guys" fighting risible "bad guys."

But when it comes to the machinations of global geopolitics, this is completely the wrong lens through which to understand what is happening. Much more to the point would be the metaphor of rival gangs competing for territory. It is not the case that the Bloods are the "good guys" and the Crips the "bad guys" or vice versa; they are both criminal networks that use brutality and violence to enforce their control over given areas and to terrorize others.

Similarly, if we understand that rivalries between various international organizations (to the extent that they exist at all) are really only battles between gangsters for control over the global turf, we can more clearly understand that it is not a question of choosing sides in the struggle but of opposing the very ideologies of centralized, hierarchical control that make these institutions possible.

DEVON DOUGLAS-BOWERS: Talk about the history of China and the US, specifically with regards to how the build-up of the Chinese economy is due to, at least in part, the involvement of US companies.

David Rockefeller with Chinese Premier Chou En-lai in Peking, June 1973

David Rockefeller with Chinese Premier Chou En-lai in Peking, June 1973

JAMES CORBETT: The modern era of Sino-American relations famously began with Henry Kissinger's secret trip to China in 1971 that paved the way for Nixon's own trip and the renormalization of relations between the two countries. But even that narrative is grossly misleading. It neglects, for example, that Kissinger was a protégé of David Rockefeller, whose family had been intimately involved in China since the early part of the 20th century and who "supported" Kissinger's China initiative, which later resulted in his Chase bank becoming the first US correspondent bank of the National Bank of China.

Regardless, Kissinger's efforts blended seamlessly into subsequent efforts by National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski (also, not coincidentally, a Rockefeller protégé and co-founder, with David, of the Trilateral Commission), and by the end of the decade the death of Mao and rise of Deng Xiaoping created the condition for the "Red Capitalism" that has led to the rise of modern China. This process was overseen by a small cadre of politically connected individuals (known in Chinese as the "Eight Immortals") whose families still continue to control vast portions of China's "national" wealth.

These "capitalist road" reforms created the conditions for massive foreign investment in the country, which began in the 1980s with the establishment of the Beijing Central Business District and the formation of Chinese subsidiaries of major Fortune 500 companies like HP. This influx of foreign capital increased in the 1990s, when direct investment of US-based multinationals in China quadrupled (from $2.6 billion in 1994 to $10.5 billion in 2001).

http://www.corbettreport.com/images/usinvestmentchina.gif
Source Data: Excel file

During this period, China became a cheap labor pool for American corporations looking to outsource manufacturing during an era of easing regulations and even direct incentives to move American jobs offshore. According to the US government's own reports, China's open door came with a price: "forced" technology transfers that allowed China to leapfrog many other developing nations to become a player on the international scene in advanced technologies. There have also been numerous military technology transfers from the US to China over the last two decades that have doubtless played a role in the rise of the PLA Navy and Air Force's capabilities.

In short, the rise of China as an economic and military power has been facilitated by a small group of oligarchical families working in close conjunction with businessmen, politicians and financiers representing oligarchical interests in the West, specifically in the US.


DEVON DOUGLAS-BOWERS: What would you say are our alternatives to trusting in these "resistance" forces and how do we keep hope alive?

JAMES CORBETT: If what we are combating is, as I posit, essentially two (or more) gangs competing for turf, then it is self-evident that we gain nothing from supporting one gang over another other than the vague hope that the other gang will treat us more kindly.

The real solution to centralized, hierarchical international institutions created by and for the interests of the oligarchical elite are decentralized, non-hierarchical relations created by and for the grassroots. One aspect of this decentralized approach is the peer-to-peer economy, i.e., the notion that technology is enabling humanity for the first time to seek out and source answers to their problems instantaneously and internationally without recourse to unwieldy institutions like the World Bank, IMF, BRICS, AIIB, NDB, WTO, etc.

p2peconomyThrough open-source collaboration people can construct more detailed (and accurate) reports of ongoing events than can ever come from slanted mainstream media journalists who are beholden to corporate interests. Through complementary currencies, LETS programs, crypto-currencies, barter exchanges, peer-to-peer lending and other means, both high-tech and low-tech, people can carry on economic transactions even when national (or regional) currencies fail. People are finding economic, social and other forms of support through grassroots community organizations that deliver the type of aid that national governments are incapable of providing. Collaborative learning and internet technologies have enabled a flowering of auto-didacticism that is rendering traditional government-sponsored and highly centralized and authoritarian forms of education all but obsolete.

In short, there is a revolution that is happening all around us, even as we speak. It does not require guns or bombs or pitchforks or protests, only participation. And it is threatening to turn the ideology of statism and its associated forms of centralization on its head, and international mafias like the IMF/World Bank and the BRICS along with it. The only question is whether we are discerning enough to perceive it, wise enough to understand it, and brave enough to see it through to its completion.

https://www.corbettreport.com/phoney-opposition-the-truth-about-the-brics/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

The Normans didn't mix much with the general population like the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes, but you're right though, as we no longer held the power.

 

they created fuedalism and the technocracy being built by the sabbateans is neo-fuedalism

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

doomsday book

 

Coff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domesday_Book Coff, spelling mistake, not having a dig but it is essential for the young audience to read the correct terminology because they don't teach history in schools any more to disenfranchise those going through the menticide system from what our ancestors stood for which is freedom and rights of the individual, 👍

 

32 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

The Normans didn't mix much with the general population like the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes, but you're right though, as we no longer held the power.

 

The Norman normal normies were basically the same people as those living here, a mercenary army cobbled together by bill the bastard and sanctioned by the vatican, which left the country under new management, i did write somewhere that the first country to go scummunist was America, but thinking about it, it was England under this new management in 1066, and all of it is dependent on the taxation of a living soul, get rid of this and all of the mental disorders of narcissistic tendencies, such as communism, fascism, royalism, despotism, zionism, systemism..etc, end up in the bin where they belong, none of the afore mentioned has anything to do with freedom and freedom is the only thing that works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Macnamara said:

it's not an 'anglosphere'

 

the anglos were invaded by the normans in 1066 who brought in jewish administrators who then set up 'the exchequer' taxation system and they audited the belongings of everyone in the country which was called the doomsday book so that they knew who they could squeeze and how hard

 

nothing has really changed since

 

it should be called the sabbatean-jewish sphere and i suggest that russia is also within that sphere even though they pretend not to be

 

the chinese-russian BRICS world order traces back to the same goldsman sachs bankers that run 'the west' 

 

 Of course the Anglos aren't in power anyway but we have been a useful scapegoat for the cabal to hide behind. Look what happens when Anglos do try and organise into tribal groups like the folkish heathens, they get slated as far-right white supremacists or something. So in fact the ptb in our own country are following the same script as Putin, and at the same time we are made to feel guilty about what has happened to tribes in other parts of the world that the cabal's empires have colonised over the centuries. Inconsistencies like this give the game away but to hide their agenda the cabal have created things like critical race theory in occupied academia to prevent us making connections with other victims. 

 

I'm currently reading David's book The Biggest Secret where he states that Britain has been a major centre for the Babylonian Brotherhood for millennia although they have tentacles spreading globally. So are we seeing a genuine transfer of power away from the west, or more like a replacement of the troublesome natives to make the Brotherhood's control easier to run. 

 

Edited by Campion
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting is if you ask people what Hitler was about they will tell you...and so will the next person and the answer will be exactly the same and none will have likely ever read or listened to anything A H actually said himself.

 

There's like a single accepted version of events passed in folklore fashion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Mr H said:

Interesting is if you ask people what Hitler was about they will tell you...and so will the next person and the answer will be exactly the same and none will have likely ever read or listened to anything A H actually said himself.

 

There's like a single accepted version of events passed in folklore fashion 

 

i think that is being unfair to folklore!

 

no what we have is propaganda to create the perceptions of people

 

its done in the educational establishments and mainstream media like sabbatean-jewish controlled hollywood

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Campion said:

Of course the Anglos aren't in power anyway but we have been a useful scapegoat for the cabal to hide behind. Look what happens when Anglos do try and organise into tribal groups like the folkish heathens, they get slated as far-right white supremacists or something. So in fact the ptb in our own country are following the same script as Putin, and at the same time we are made to feel guilty about what has happened to tribes in other parts of the world that the cabal's empires have colonised over the centuries. Inconsistencies like this give the game away but to hide their agenda the cabal have created things like critical race theory in occupied academia to prevent us making connections with other victims.

 

oh i think our unelected leaders are far worse than putin. Has putin ever said that russia was 'too white' because humsa yousaf has said that about scotland and leo varadkar has said that about ireland. so their script is even more extreme than putins

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mr H said:

Interesting is if you ask people what Hitler was about they will tell you...and so will the next person and the answer will be exactly the same and none will have likely ever read or listened to anything A H actually said himself.

 

There's like a single accepted version of events passed in folklore fashion 

 

Wasn't there a story recently about the Israelis finding an Arabic copy of Mein Kampf in a Hamas house in Gaza? This was paraded as evidence of them being evil people who sympathise with the Nazis, so if you try and read the historical source material and learn about all sides of the subject in an objective way you can easily fall foul of the thought police unless you are an accredited academic in one of the sanitised universities. Nowadays most people are indoctrinated by the system to accept what they are taught and self-censor what they read.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Campion said:

Wasn't there a story recently about the Israelis finding an Arabic copy of Mein Kampf in a Hamas house in Gaza?

 

This appears to be awfully familiar, what was the book constructed of, was it 911 military grade passport of indestructible material by chance, 🤔

This needs to be a meme.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

oh i think our unelected leaders are far worse than putin. Has putin ever said that russia was 'too white' because humsa yousaf has said that about scotland and leo varadkar has said that about ireland. so their script is even more extreme than putins

 

Good point, I don't think Putin has insulted his own people like that. Though, as a supposedly good orthodox Christian he isn't concerned about the demographic shift towards Russia becoming more muslim. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Campion said:

 

Good point, I don't think Putin has insulted his own people like that. Though, as a supposedly good orthodox Christian he isn't concerned about the demographic shift towards Russia becoming more muslim. 

Interesting this dude thinks Russia will have 30% Muslim population in near future. Seems to be the fastest growing religion. One fellow conspiracy theorist I sometimes speak to is of the opinion that the NWO plan is to make Islam the one new world religion. Not sure myself but something keeping an eye on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Mr H said:

Interesting this dude thinks Russia will have 30% Muslim population in near future. Seems to be the fastest growing religion. One fellow conspiracy theorist I sometimes speak to is of the opinion that the NWO plan is to make Islam the one new world religion. Not sure myself but something keeping an eye on.

 

no that's pure nonsense

 

the sabbateans are not trying to build their third temple on temple mount in jerusalem just so that they can make it muslim. Someone is trying to manipulate you into focussing your attention on islam

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Campion said:

 

Good point, I don't think Putin has insulted his own people like that. Though, as a supposedly good orthodox Christian he isn't concerned about the demographic shift towards Russia becoming more muslim. 

 

so what myself and enigmatic world (mostly EW) have been exploring in my 'is russia part of the new world order' thread is the idea of the 'perestroika deception' which is to say the idea that russia never really turned from communism towards capitalism but is in fact still communist and working towards the destruction of capitalism

 

Certainly putin is an old KGB agent from the communist days of the soviet and he is allied with the communist chinese who piggy-back capitalism towards global domination

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

so what myself and enigmatic world (mostly EW) have been exploring in my 'is russia part of the new world order' thread is the idea of the 'perestroika deception' which is to say the idea that russia never really turned from communism towards capitalism but is in fact still communist and working towards the destruction of capitalism

 

Certainly putin is an old KGB agent from the communist days of the soviet and he is allied with the communist chinese who piggy-back capitalism towards global domination

 

"Communism" being very much in inverted commas because it's nothing like the type of society envisioned by idealistic western intellectuals where the working class gain control and and the ruling class becomes redundant. Whatever we can call the outcome of this communist/capitalist dialectic it looks like a pyramid with its head hidden in the clouds. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

so what myself and enigmatic world (mostly EW) have been exploring in my 'is russia part of the new world order' thread is the idea of the 'perestroika deception' which is to say the idea that russia never really turned from communism towards capitalism but is in fact still communist and working towards the destruction of capitalism

 

Certainly putin is an old KGB agent from the communist days of the soviet and he is allied with the communist chinese who piggy-back capitalism towards global domination

 

I mostly agree, but I think @Campion had a fair point here:

 

4 hours ago, Campion said:

"Communism" being very much in inverted commas because it's nothing like the type of society envisioned by idealistic western intellectuals

 

I think the issue with just calling them communist, that often creates confusion, is that actual communists will say that it's not real communism because Russia isn't economically communist, which I would agree with. However, even if they're not practicing 100% communism, there's still a trust issue because they still have people in power that were part of the Soviet system. I'm also concerned about them temporarily giving up Marxian policies as part of some long range strategem, to fool the non-communist world.

 

For those that don't see Russia as overtly communist, I can understand that, but I guess this is where the warnings from KGB defectors come in.

 

This graphic is worth remembering too.

 

bc.jpg

 

Someone like Dugin for example, I don't know if he is your stereotypical commie that wants to seize the means of production, but it's still clear that he holds a lot of the same anti-western views that old school communists held/hold.

 

dugin.jpg

 

I guess this is why Eurasianism might be a more accurate term to use, but unfortunately it takes more explaining.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/17/2023 at 8:19 PM, Campion said:

 

"Communism" being very much in inverted commas because it's nothing like the type of society envisioned by idealistic western intellectuals where the working class gain control and and the ruling class becomes redundant. Whatever we can call the outcome of this communist/capitalist dialectic it looks like a pyramid with its head hidden in the clouds. 

 

hegel's dialectic is essentially a mind trick and i think we kind of get an example of it in the bible where solomon is faced with two women who both claim a baby is theirs. Solomon says he will chop the baby in half and when one mother then speaks up and says to let the other woman have the baby if he doesn't chop it in half, he then knows that woman who showed the concern is the real mother

 

so we have these financiers who sutton called 'wall st bankers' but whose power extends far beyond wall street. I would call them the rothschild cabal but i agree with sutton in his definition of our current economy as 'corporate socialism' rather than capitalism.

 

Those financiers have subverted capitalism through the creation of central banks into a corporate socialist, command and control economy. However everyone stills mistakenly calls this 'capitalism' and i think this is done deliberately to pass on the blame of the faults of the current system onto capitalism instead of onto the corporate socialists.

 

But anyway, they control that game. I think most people would agree with that part. But what i'm saying is that those same people also created communism and those same powerful financial interests are behind wokeness and what is today called 'the left' along with its corporate ESG's and green economy.

 

So they are creating essentially a big crisis or as david would say a PROBLEM. Their controlled 'left' identifies the problems of their controlled 'capitalism' (corporate socialism where their banks are bailed out by the state) and lots of people get seduced by the left because yes there really are problems with corporate socialism and this then creates a hunger for change.

 

Corporate socialism (mislabelled as capitalism) is then brought to ruin and out of that whole orchestrated conflict which has left everyone disillusioned and calling out for change they then offer the now desperate people their pre-prepared solution: the technocracy

 

PROBLEM-REACTION-SOLUTION

 

So we are at the stage now where the corporate socialism system (mislabelled 'capitalism') is beginning to fail, the left is reaching a fever pitch in their attacks on the system and the financial elites are beginning to offer and sell their solution to us all in the form of smart-grid cities, 15 minute ghettos, 5G cloud and internet of things controlled by artificial intelligence, lab grown meat, enforced veganism, biomettrics, universal basic income, social credit scores, central bank digital currencies, mRNA jabs, GMO foods, transhumanism etc....and many people are buying into it for example people can't get enough of all the smart-tech and wifi

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

 

hegel's dialectic is essentially a mind trick and i think we kind of get an example of it in the bible where solomon is faced with two women who both claim a baby is theirs. Solomon says he will chop the baby in half and when one mother then speaks up and says to let the other woman have the baby if he doesn't chop it in half, he then knows that woman who showed the concern is the real mother

 

so we have these financiers who sutton called 'wall st bankers' but whose power extends far beyond wall street. I would call them the rothschild cabal but i agree with sutton in his definition of our current economy as 'corporate socialism' rather than capitalism.

 

Those financiers have subverted capitalism through the creation of central banks into a corporate socialist, command and control economy. However everyone stills mistakenly calls this 'capitalism' and i think this is done deliberately to pass on the blame of the faults of the current system onto capitalism instead of onto the corporate socialists.

 

But anyway, they control that game. I think most people would agree with that part. But what i'm saying is that those same people also created communism and those same powerful financial interests are behind wokeness and what is today called 'the left' along with its corporate ESG's and green economy.

 

So they are creating essentially a big crisis or as david would say a PROBLEM. Their controlled 'left' identifies the problems of their controlled 'capitalism' (corporate socialism where their banks are bailed out by the state) and lots of people get seduced by the left because yes there really are problems with corporate socialism and this then creates a hunger for change.

 

Corporate socialism (mislabelled as capitalism) is then brought to ruin and out of that whole orchestrated conflict which has left everyone disillusioned and calling out for change they then offer the now desperate people their pre-prepared solution: the technocracy

 

PROBLEM-REACTION-SOLUTION

 

So we are at the stage now where the corporate socialism system (mislabelled 'capitalism') is beginning to fail, the left is reaching a fever pitch in their attacks on the system and the financial elites are beginning to offer and sell their solution to us all in the form of smart-grid cities, 15 minute ghettos, 5G cloud and internet of things controlled by artificial intelligence, lab grown meat, enforced veganism, biomettrics, universal basic income, social credit scores, central bank digital currencies, mRNA jabs, GMO foods, transhumanism etc....and many people are buying into it for example people can't get enough of all the smart-tech and wifi

 

Hegel's dialectic might be used more in the West, where the corruption is more cartoonish and overt. The Eurasian bloc can be a bit more sneaky.

 

br.jpg

 

 

Maybe JFK had a point about judging by actions.

 

On 12/2/2023 at 7:10 PM, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

 

 

 

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

"OCCULT FORCES - THE MYSTERIES OF FREEMASONRY (1943)"

https://www.bitchute.com/video/FyJqTZQKkXXh/

 

"Following WW2, the film's writer, Jean-Marie Rivière, was imprisoned. Its producer, Robert Muzard, and director, Paul Riche (the pseudonym of Jean Mamy), were executed for their part in the production of this film. "Occult Forces" was the last film Riche directed before his unjust execution.

 

The film recounts the life of a young member of parliament who joins the Freemasons in order to relaunch his career. He thus learns of how the Freemasons are conspiring to encourage France into a war against Germany.".

 

[Jean Mamy had been a Freemason of "The Grand Orient de France"  prior]

 

forces-occultes.jpeg

 

 

Tell me the film is a lie.

 

 

fdr-mason-4.jpg

truman.jpg

 

They are like whitewashed tombs, clean on the outside but full of death within.

 

 

 

Edited by novymir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who acknowledges this evidence for the 3d Reich being funded by Wall street and still claims the Nazis where the good guys is clearly delusional. Fascism (like communism) is just a tool used by the transhumanist eugenicist technocratic global elitists in this Hegelian Dialectic to steer humanity to eternal slavery and servitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...