kj35 Posted December 19, 2022 Share Posted December 19, 2022 (edited) Absolutely disgraceful ruling today https://nltimes.nl/2022/12/19/dutch-court-upholds-2-year-entry-ban-conspiracy-theorist-david-icke Edited December 19, 2022 by kj35 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Concerned Citizen Posted December 19, 2022 Share Posted December 19, 2022 (edited) 13 minutes ago, kj35 said: Absolutely disgraceful ruling today As David Icke states on his video about this ruling - he did not expect any other decision than the one that he got. My take on this, and David Icke in his video also says something to the same effect, the ruling just adds to the fact that David is so close to the truth that there is a fear that he will spread it to others. This case has actually brought MORE attention to David Icke than perhaps if he had gone out there to speak. In addition the actual banning of "one man" must surely make one or two more sit up and question the situation. Having said that, on the basis of the last couple of "sheeple" that I have encountered when I tried to begin to outline why the "key" thing in this "covid" scam was the FRAUDULENT pcr test they did not want to know. They had been "triple jabbed" now and what could they do about it. They did NOT want to hear my explanation about the situation. It had happened and they repeated what could they now do? I was not quite sure how to deal with that answer. Any helpful suggestions appreciated. note: my reference "so close" to the truth just gives a small element where David could have got a very minor point wrong. I know of one but it it is so small and insignificant now. In fact a 0.01% less than the danger of that so called thing that was supposed to be deadly to people! Some of you might be familiar with the 99% reference during marches in London. Edited December 19, 2022 by Concerned Citizen extra added Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemuri Kyoshiro Posted December 19, 2022 Share Posted December 19, 2022 I hope he appeals. A two-year ban on travel is preposterous and for the court to rule that it is the "only effective way" to prevent DI from entering Dutch territory is nonsense. It certainly isn't justice. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Grapes Posted December 19, 2022 Share Posted December 19, 2022 What happens when the 2 years is up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screamingeagle Posted December 19, 2022 Share Posted December 19, 2022 1 minute ago, Grumpy Grapes said: What happens when the 2 years is up? another 5 years.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.