Jump to content

TRUTHBLAST HOME


Truthblast

Recommended Posts

https://www.history.com/news/ufos-washington-dc-news-reports

Quote

The Rhinelander Daily News (Rhinelander, Wisconsin), page 1, July 30, 1952

EXCERPT: ‘The bulk of these, after cross-checking, have been reasonably well identified as the product of friendly aircraft, out-and-out hoaxes, or electrical or meteorological phenomena...

The two generals added that the hot weather of recent weeks well might be related to the current outbreak of saucer reports. They said that a temperature inversion—a layer of warm air over cool air—sometimes may be sufficient to deflect radar waves and cause a false response on a radar set.’ 

 

 

bored with this now ok ........

Edited by Deca
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deca said:

About as belivable of Santa doing a better job than Amazon can...  It look nothing like the Video of what was seen for a week and filmed.. If it was Hoaxes.. in the 50's Heads would roll and Perpetrators prosecuted.. You are clutching at straws, and your bored with it cause you are running out of other peoples lies to try to dis-miss the phenonom.

Edited by SkyBlueEyes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SkyBlueEyes said:

About as belivable of Santa doing a better job than Amazon can...  It look nothing like the Video of what was seen for a week and filmed.. If it was Hoaxes.. in the 50's Heads would roll and Perpetrators prosecuted.. You are clutching at straws, and your bored with it cause you are running out of other peoples lies to try to dis-miss the phenonom.

it proves  weather inversion in Washington DC  is common not rare ...simple ...and is what you ask 

 

9 hours ago, SkyBlueEyes said:

@ Deca

Have you found any weather inversion in Washington DC in the last 70 years that matched the ones in 1952 that occured every night for a week yet?   it has to be common, weather generally is  or are you gonna admit governmet lied?    I know you not gonna say alien but well then it was pesky russia in 52 show there air supiroity

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I am asking for is you to show me 1 video of a weather inversioin Over Washington in the last 70 Years..  thats 25K +  potential days for it have re-occured..  that is great odds for find something to repeat in..   If it can happen every day for week 7 out 7 .. so  1 in 25K + , I am pretty sure it you will come up with a least 1, once...  If you can do that you can  get your claim to fame to be the New Phil Class

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SkyBlueEyes said:

All I am asking for is you to show me 1 video of a weather inversioin Over Washington in the last 70 Years..  thats 25K +  potential days for it have re-occured..  that is great odds for find something to repeat in..   If it can happen every day for week 7 out 7 .. so  1 in 25K + , I am pretty sure it you will come up with a least 1, once...  If you can do that you can  get your claim to fame to be the New Phil Class

Quote

The Rhinelander Daily News (Rhinelander, Wisconsin), page 1, July 30, 1952

EXCERPT: ‘The bulk of these, after cross-checking, have been reasonably well identified as the product of friendly aircraft, out-and-out hoaxes, or electrical or meteorological phenomena...

The two generals added that the hot weather of recent weeks well might be related to the current outbreak of saucer reports. They said that a temperature inversion—a layer of warm air over cool air—sometimes may be sufficient to deflect radar waves and cause a false response on a radar set.’ 

Quote

 temperature inversion—a layer of warm air over cool air—sometimes may be sufficient to deflect radar waves and cause a false response on a radar set.’ 

 

YOU CAN`T EVEN READ ..... the lights in the sky was caused by various other things 

Edited by Deca
Link to comment
Share on other sites

that not even real footage but an animation from a still FFS 

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/47215/is-this-video-authentic-footage-from-1952-washington-dc

 

image.png.ddfccb2fdb029de754183c112323704f.png

 

 

 

now stop bothering me and bother the idiots that propagate and profit out of UFO mythology and fill your head up with such fantasy 

 

Edited by Deca
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not FireWork Smoke.. .. "They" Glow and move in straight line trajectory  .. 

It is Not 1950's State of the art Drone....  "They" Glow and make no Engine Noise...

If was a Hoax... No one to this date has claimed to pulled off the biggest hoax of the millinium getting even Generals to panic about the Phenonom and responded with Weather Inversion LIE

What else you got left ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

4 minutes ago, Deca said:

that not even real footage but an animation from a still FFS 

so Stills of a real event is Not REAL?  you mean cause you put two or more images next to one another and show them it not Real....   Those bastards at HollyWood have got a lot explaing to do,, I just Knew what they put out was not Real...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You Know in a court of Law.. Murders have been hung with LESS evidence

And if you combine all the evidence of Black Holes, Dark Matters, Dark Energy, Big Bang, Darwins Therory of evolution(do you belive in any of the previous mentioned Beliefs), you still have no where near the amout evidence, not even close to amount of evidence to the UFO phenonom being real.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SkyBlueEyes said:

You Know in a court of Law.. Murders have been hung with LESS evidence

And if you combine all the evidence of Black Holes, Dark Matters, Dark Energy, Big Bang, Darwins Therory of evolution(do you belive in any of the previous mentioned Beliefs), you still have no where near the amout evidence, not even close to amount of evidence to the UFO phenonom being real.

 

you not shown me any credible evidence thou..........

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I Have shown you just 1 event   in 1952, and you are the one that is getting frustrated cause other peoples argument do NOT discredited it and because your getting Frustrated, maybe you should reconsider your Position and Start thinking for Your Self.

Edited by SkyBlueEyes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, you know if you joined the Side of Truth.. the Light side and shine light onto things it makes  the world a brighter place,  and you will become a better person for it,  but if you Want to be on the Dark side, bury you head in the sand, decieve and lie all the time (may not even know it but is repeating some one elses lie the same doing it your self).. being on the Dark side is destorying your self, after all you getting frustrated severs no purpose to your own well being.. Turn the light on in your head and think your own thoughts with clarity...

Edited by SkyBlueEyes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, SkyBlueEyes said:

 

So from all over the city of DC they all get see the same LENs Flare...  I think NOT

no somebody took 1 photo with a lens flare in it ....sent to the papers ...the papers used it "flying saucers  of DC"  and any somebody saw an odd thing in the sky claimed the seen the UFO`s .....years later somebody animated the still picture into a video and claimed it was some mass sighting and used it to sell UFO books videos myths ......

 

Now you just insulting my intelligence ... so I am leaving this thread

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

4 minutes ago, Deca said:

Now you just insulting my intelligence ... so I am leaving this thread

OK so your telling ME the Might of the AMERICAN MILATARY was SO scared of a RE-Occuring LENS Flare That GENERALS would FLY to WASHINGTON and Say "Weather inversion, go back to sleep nothing to see here" ...     Ok like NOW who is inulting who...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Despite it was explained as a digital animation, this video (here's the full sequence) was often miscaptioned and recycled out of its original context as a real footage. Nope, that was a clip created in CGI for a TV movie broadcast on British television in 2005 titled "UFOs: The Secret Evidence", known in US as "An Alien History of Planet Earth" and broadcast in 2006 on History Channel.

Also, that digital animation tried to show what I call a big "UFO misrepresentation": the alleged flying saucers taken over Washington Capitol building in 1952. The UFO researcher Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos found the photo from which the "misunderstanding" started: the objects taken in that old photo were just lens flares (http://www.nicap.org/images/19520719wash_proof.jpg) and the photo is actually dated 1965.

Source: http://www.nicap.org/520719washington_dir.htm

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=534183647303681

http://www.nicap.org/images/19520719wash_proof.jpg

 

image.png.665e58ea8fda77b4c207800fe45c302b.png

 

Edited by Deca
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you Can't Discredit the Event

Plan B

Discredit the Evidence...  

 

So What we Got Now ...   Fake animation  Of a Real LIVE LENS Flare, that all in DC saw for A week that Got evey one in A Tiz...   Including the President and all his Cheif's of Staff.. So I guess in DC, Peolpe are Stupid and DO NOT know a LENS Flare when they see one when they look up..   "Hey honey, look up there, it is one them UFO's!!!!",,  "You Dumb Broad, Lens FLARE",   "So Why is it MOVING, I thought LENS FLAREs were static to viewing Angle",  " I'm sorry Honey I forget you is a Phyicsist, did not mean to call you Dumb"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Deca

 

19 Light on the streets

 

11 lights in the Sky..

 

2 of the lines point at nothing..

 

1 street light points to 2 lights in the Sky

 

 

the numbers do not match so just a deception of proof of not real.. but it just a deception in it self...   You had me looking then.. Fake excplanation

Edited by SkyBlueEyes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...