Jump to content

Jesus was trans - argues Cambridge Dean


Mikhail Liebestein
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11473423/Its-heresy-Worshippers-left-tears-Cambridge-dean-claims-Jesus-TRANSGENDER.html

 

Side wound imagery takes on appearance of a vagina and Jesus represents the body of all bodes.

 

I'm not religious, so find the whole thing hilarious.

 

What next, a split in the Church?

The new Jesus Was Trans (JesWaT) Community versus CoE.

 

My only interpretation of the Bible was the whole disciples thing was a bit suspicious- 13 grown man hanging around in a group and not being gangsters- what did they get up to?

 

 

Edited by Mikhail Liebestein
  • Haha 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11473423/Its-heresy-Worshippers-left-tears-Cambridge-dean-claims-Jesus-TRANSGENDER.html

 

Side wound imagery takes on appearance of a vagina and Jesus represents the body of all bodes.

 

I'm not religious, so find the whole thing hilarious.

 

What next, a split in the Church?

The new Jesus Was Trans (JesWaT) Community versus CoE.

 

My only interpretation of the Bible was the whole disciples thing was a bit suspicious- 13 grown man hanging around in a group and not be gangsters- wgat did they get up to?

 

 

 

Jesus was not transgender in any way.

 

This is one more sleazy attack on the Abrahamic religions.

 

Clear case of a Trans calling everyone else Trans.

 

The spear that split Jesus's side on the cross was later called "The Spear of Destinity".

 

Adolf Hitler had the whole world searched for that spear - his SS officers went everywhere looking for it.

 

Hitler thought that being in possession of it would make him master of the universe.

 

He thought the spear could protect him against God's wrath.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11473423/Its-heresy-Worshippers-left-tears-Cambridge-dean-claims-Jesus-TRANSGENDER.html

 

Side wound imagery takes on appearance of a vagina and Jesus represents the body of all bodes.

 

I'm not religious, so find the whole thing hilarious.

 

What next, a split in the Church?

The new Jesus Was Trans (JesWaT) Community versus CoE.

 

My only interpretation of the Bible was the whole disciples thing was a bit suspicious- 13 grown man hanging around in a group and not being gangsters- what did they get up to?

 

 

 

Yeah - They'd like us all to believe this, anything to to give their LGBT movement more credibility :classic_angry:

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just another sick twist on the old gay slurs against Jesus. The Anglican Church - well the high church version that exists in Cambridge - is merely aping Rome in their not-so-subtle attempts to deny the deity of Christ. You can't take this fool seriously.

 

Last of all, of Jesus was a transsexual, wouldn't that imply that he was a created being? Dragon language if ever there was.

Edited by Nemuri Kyoshiro
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

Just another sick twist on the old gay slurs against Jesus. The Anglican Church - well the high church version that exists in Cambridge - is merely aping Rome in their not-so-subtle attempts to deny the deity of Christ. You can't take this fool seriously.

 

I can see right through what they are trying to do & it ain't going to work, well I hope not. How gullible do they believe the masses to be ? Next they'll be changing the bible to gender friendly as not to include the words 'man' or 'women' aimed towards the younger generation. 

 

But they'll have a hard job changing this passage ? 

 

Genesis 1:27
So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

I can see right through what they are trying to do & it ain't going to work, well I hope not. How gullible do they believe the masses to be ? Next they'll be changing the bible to gender friendly as not to include the words 'man' or 'women' aimed towards the younger generation. 

 

But they'll have a hard job changing this passage ? 

 

Genesis 1:27
So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

 

Check your rear view mirror, and what we left behind, gullible is not the word you are looking for, 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2022 at 9:12 AM, Mikhail Liebestein said:

My only interpretation of the Bible was the whole disciples thing was a bit suspicious- 13 grown man hanging around in a group and not being gangsters- what did they get up to?

 

Beer drinking is as good an excuse for any male bonding session, followed by fart lighting contests, i know, been there, done that got the burn marks to prove it, :classic_blink:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, alexa said:

I can see right through what they are trying to do & it ain't going to work, well I hope not. How gullible do they believe the masses to be ? Next they'll be changing the bible to gender friendly as not to include the words 'man' or 'women' aimed towards the younger generation. 

 

There are certain Jewish groups that want antisemitism warnings printed on the NT. It's absurd of course, given the hatred of Gentiles that oozes out of their Talmud.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, alexa said:

 

I can see right through what they are trying to do & it ain't going to work, well I hope not. How gullible do they believe the masses to be ? Next they'll be changing the bible to gender friendly as not to include the words 'man' or 'women' aimed towards the younger generation. 

 

But they'll have a hard job changing this passage ? 

 

Genesis 1:27
So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

 

NEW CORRECTED Genesis 1:27
So Darwin created they/them in their/thems own image; in the pixels of Darwin he/them created them/themses; non-birthing person and birthing person and sometimes birthng person hoo/hey created they/that.

 

HA HA HA HA!   🤣

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2022 at 4:12 AM, Mikhail Liebestein said:

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11473423/Its-heresy-Worshippers-left-tears-Cambridge-dean-claims-Jesus-TRANSGENDER.html

 

Side wound imagery takes on appearance of a vagina and Jesus represents the body of all bodes.

 

I'm not religious, so find the whole thing hilarious.

 

What next, a split in the Church?

The new Jesus Was Trans (JesWaT) Community versus CoE.

 

My only interpretation of the Bible was the whole disciples thing was a bit suspicious- 13 grown man hanging around in a group and not being gangsters- what did they get up to?

 

 

 

That was the question the Pharisees and Sadducees were asking themselves. Those 13 grown men put such fear into the religious authorities in Jerusalem that they plotted to murder their leader on trumped-up charges and imprison and execute thereafter, any one of them who dared to preach in his name. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/2/2022 at 11:36 PM, Anti Facts Sir said:

A non-binary barcode?

 

I'm not buying it.

 

You need a Plessey Code:

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessey_Code

 

Apparently they encode Hexidecimal, so definitely non binary!

 

Quote

Plessey Code is a 1D linear barcode symbology based on pulse-width modulation, developed in 1971 by The Plessey Company plc, a British-based company. It is one of the first barcode symbology, and is still used rarely in some libraries and for shelf tags in retail stores, in part as a solution to their internal requirement for stock control. The system was first used in the early 1970s by J.Sainsbury to identify all of its products on supermarket shelves for its product restocking system.

 

Quote
Plessey Code barcode composition

The barcode encodes hexadecimal digits (i.e., the hex digits 0-F) as 4 bars (bits). The LSB is on the first bar on the left, and the MSB is the last bar on the right. A "0" bit is represented as a narrow bar, followed by a wide space. The "1" is represented by a wide bar, followed by a narrow space.

The barcode can be read in either direction (left to right or right to left).

The barcode comprises:

  • the forward start code
  • the label / data digits
  • the check code, for error detection
  • the termination bar
  • the reverse start code

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr H said:

I dare, sorry, double dare the LGBQT community to go after Mohammed! 😅

They won't, unless they want to take flying lessons. A Muslim friend of mine is highly offended by the Dean's comments. Islam reveres Jesus as a great prophet and so he said that this is a slight against Islam as well as Christianity.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing new here.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piss_Christ

 

David Michells take on it


 

Quote

 

when I heard that Piss Christ had been vandalised, I instantly thought of Cock Jesus. More of Cock Jesus later. In case, like me, you hadn't heard of Piss Christ, let me explain that it's an artwork – a photograph, taken by artist Andres Serrano, of a plastic crucifix submerged in his own quite orange urine – maybe he'd just had a Berocca. Last weekend, some devout Christians attacked Piss Christ with a hammer.

I say that's just a continuation of the artistic process. By creating a new work, Shards Piss Christ, these extremist Catholics made a profound artistic statement about Piss Christ's desecration of holy imagery by themselves violating the sanctity of the gallery. It's a devotional work worthy of comparison to the Sistine Chapel.

I hope the process continues. Shards Piss Christ could, say, be pelted with excrement, making Shit Shards Piss Christ. That could be shoved in a bin bag, making Bin Bag Shit Shards Piss Christ. Someone might be sick on that, creating Vomit Bin Bag Shit Shards Piss Christ.

It need never end. This captivating dialogue between the most provocative elements of the contemporary art scene and the hooligan wing of the Church of Rome, this great clash between two such fundamentally annoying groups, could one day result in the eclipse of The Mona Lisa and Hamlet by Explosion Threshing-machine Pig's-alimentary-canal Toilet-bowl Inhaled-then-sneezed-out Set-on-fire Vomit Bin Bag Shit Shards Piss Christ, mankind's most provocative masterpiece.

Which brings me to Cock Jesus. About 10 years ago, Robert Webb and I wrote a sketch based on the daytime TV show Watercolour Challenge, in which the peace of the sleepy contestants, staring at hillsides and dabbing at easels, is shattered by the presence of a "shocking" modern artist. To his consternation, the programme's presenter refuses to be provoked, reacting to even his most horrific blood-, death- and swastika-strewn imagery with a patronising: "Well done, that's very pretty!"

In the first draft of the sketch, Cock Jesus was his final attempt to shock (it never appeared in the broadcast version for reasons of budget, taste and decency). It's a statue of Jesus, he explains, "made out of the amputated cocks of dead Anglican vicars whose bodies I've been illegally exhuming for the last six weeks!" "Ooh, I do love angry art," coos the presenter as she moves on to the next contestant to advise on a quick way of doing clouds.

Cock Jesus and Piss Christ have more in common than penises and the Son of God. Their artists, real and fictional, both craved conflict and, only in the fictional case, was the craving left unsated. In real life, someone, unlike the indulgent presenter in the sketch, always reacts. But I don't think those who protested against Piss Christ, who insulted the artist, sent hate mail to the dealer, protested outside the gallery or finally attacked the work itself, were duped. I think they've succeeded in their aims as much as Serrano. It's the rest of us who are the mugs for dignifying these squabbles with our attention.

I've come to a similar conclusion about the case of Colin Atkinson, the electrician whose employers have told him to stop displaying a palm cross in the van he drives for them. For a while, I got sucked into trying to work out the rights and wrongs. Is the heavy-handedly pro-Atkinson line taken by the newspaper reporting the story correct? Is it genuinely "political correctness gone mad", as George Carey was tempted out of retirement to say (There's a phrase that might catch on – he's got the gift of the gab, that guy), and "one rule for Christians and another rule for followers of any other religion", as Ann Widdecombe broke off from rehearsals to add? Or has the employer got a point? Or maybe the employer hasn't got a point and it's just my contrarian response to that newspaper which is making me look for one? After all, what harm can a little cross do?

Then I thought: "Hang on, I know what might be going on here. Maybe everyone involved in this dispute is awful." It would explain a lot. Most people, if they're not very religious and see someone displaying a cross, would think anything from: "Nothing wrong with that" to: "Mental note: this guy's a bit of a God-botherer – don't get stuck with him at a party." It takes quite a leap of self-importance to decide: "I'm going to put a stop to that!"

Equally, when told by their boss to stop displaying a cross in their van, most people's response would be somewhere on a scale between immediately acceding to the request and complaining before giving in because it's really not such a big deal. Taking it all the way to a disciplinary procedure and talking to a national newspaper is the mark of an unusual man. But is he principled or just stubborn? Righteous or self-righteous? Would it be a better world if everyone was like that?

God, no! It would be a much better world if no one was. The only role for people like that is to stand up to each other. You need the unbending Churchills to save us from the mass-murdering Hitlers but, with no Hitlers around, the Churchills are annoying as hell.

The media's obsession with conflict means that we're confronted with it so relentlessly that we've stopped questioning why it's there in the first place. We ask: "Which side is right? Who do I support?" but not: "Do they really need to be arguing about this? Why is so much of our time taken up listening to small minorities who are incensed by other small minorities rather than the vast majority who just want to rub along OK?"

When watching the news, it's so easy to forget what most of us are like: pleasant, polite, socially shy. We don't want rows, we want a quiet life. We feel inadequate because we don't protest and argue more – we don't stand up for ourselves. And, in feeling that, we forget that the sort of people who do stand up for themselves are cut from the same cloth as the sort of people you have to stand up to.

It's a tyranny of the argumentative, an unholy alliance of the unholy and the holy, of the extreme right and the extreme left, of Stars and Stripes-burners and Qur'an -burners – people who define themselves by their mutual hatred, have a jolly good time doing it and leave the acquiescent majority running around in circles trying to pick up the pieces.

Well, I'm not going to take it any more! By which I mean, I'm sure it'll work itself out.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Heidi Gillen said:

Since when did Indigo and Violet come into the spectrum of the 🌈? At primary school I was always taught it was Pink and Purple. Did the education system lie to me all my life? I can’t cope. 

Indigo and violet are a wonderful non-CIS, non-binary trans couple. Indigo is passionate about climate change, and violet marches in protests against female mutilation.

 

They/They are an example to us all.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...