Jump to content

Richard D Hall


alexa

Recommended Posts

Richard D Hall will be attending the High Court of Justice on Monday 29th January, where his well-documented claim that nobody died at the Manchester Arena ‘bombing’ at the Aria Grande concert in May of 2017 is being contested. Its a ‘preliminary hearing’ in which the prosecutors are aiming to get an injunction to prevent RDH from being allowed to present his evidence at the forthcoming court hearing. You couldn’t make it up! the preposterous charge of harassment has been levelled at him, for merely doing his job as an investigative journalist. If anyone has been harassed it is he, by the BBC’s  clueless bimbo conspiracy expert Marianna Spring, in the BBC’s ‘disaster trolls’ series (see ‘checktheevidence.com’ below). His interview with James Delingpole – where I’m alluded to at 9 minutes -is the first UK mainstream discussion of state-fabricated terror.

To remind ourselves –

BBC hit-pieces against RDH on checktheevidence.com  

Delingpole interview

Text of RDH’s book

Richplanet vids on Manchester

A brief summary by me

Sarah Plumley evaluates the cover-up

 Richard’s big 40-page book ‘The Night of the Bang’ detailing his investigations is now banned by Amazon and is hard to get.

In the interview he did with James Delingpole – about the only interview he has given as far as I know – he was asked about how the number 22 kept on turning up all over the place.  Richard stressed that yes this number was everywhere, but, no,  he had no idea what it was doing there.  RDH: “The number 22 is everywhere  … they have deliberately put that number in all of the hearings, they were always on the 22nd, Every news release was on the 22nd … for some sort of occult reason. they were occultists. I don’t think this was hatched in the UK .. You have to suspect some sort of Israeli involvement. Drone strikes in Libya went up massively in Libra after the event .. Israeli involvement in requesting the operation … The US were involved as well.” At 22 mins, these two have *no clue* about what the number 22 signifies.

Here we reveal the meaning of this number! First of all, here’s how it thrums through the storyline:

At Manchester,

  1. 22 died
  2. on 22 may.
  3. at 10.30, or 22 hours.
  4. killed by a 22 year old Muslim ‘terrorist.’
  5. Aria Grande had just finished singing her 22 songs, before the attack.
  6. Martin Hibbert, who is suing RDH, was next to the ‘explosion’ and received 22 pieces of shrapnel in his body.
  7. A young nurse at the Manchester hospital could not cope with all the wounded and committed suicide, she was 22 years old
  8. The ‘terrorist’ being dead could not be charged, so instead his brother Hashem Abedi was tried, who too was 22 years old.
  9. He was charged on 22 counts.
  10. A month after the event, Greater Manchester police reported that ‘all 22 suspects have now been released without charge.’

COMPARE the big Euro fabricated – terror events on the 22nd:  

     Norway attack – 22.7.11

     Woolwich attack (Lee Rigby) – 22.5.13

     Brussels attack – 22.3.16  

     Munich attack  22.7.16

    Westminster Bridge, London attack  22.3.17

    Manchester attack   22.5.17

Proposed-Holocaust-memorial-300x213.jpg

The proposed Holocaust memorial next to British Houses of Parliament. Click to enlarge

Only the first of these had real deaths. For full details see my ‘False Flags over Europe, a Modern History of State-Fabricated Terror.’ 

          There are 22 letters in the Hebrew alphabet and 22 paths of the Kaballah

The proposed Holohoax Temple due to be built next to the Houses of Parliament  will be based upon the number 22:  “The design includes 23 bronze fins creating 22 “gaps”, representing the 22 countries in which Jewish communities were destroyed.” Uh-huh.

https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=280779

  • Thanks 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First day of the trial and a meida black out I could only find a couple of articles

 

h**ps://www.inverness-courier.co.uk/news/national/manchester-arena-survivors-sue-conspiracy-theorist-who-claims-attack-was-fake-98756/


h**ps://www.ireland-live.ie/news/uk/1408739/manchester-arena-survivors-sue-conspiracy-theorist-who-claims-attack-was-fake.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Captainlove said:

It isn't looking good, and judging by those nasty, clueless comments it shows how most people haven't got a bloody clue about anything and have never done any research. They don't realise the court system can be fixed when it suits them and evidence ignored. If those people would just look at what Richard presents in his documentaries and read his book instead of believing some mainsream media news site then they will judge for themselves. Richard looked stressed in that photo. Hope none of the people turning up to support Richard acted odd and dressed inappropriately.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think it is a mistake to engage with them.(There might be some benefit though).

 

Like he should have done what Max Igan did. 

 

Alex Jones comes off like a buffoon, and ended up agreeing that 2+2=5 about Sandy Hook.

 

I wouldn't assume that comments on corporate news sites are genuine either.

 

Basically the government(s) wants to be able to just round up with impunity anyone that publicly and effectively disputes the idea that the government and corporate-whore media is not a self-serving cancerous entity that will use any means necessary to increase it's power, control, and privileged positions above it's mind-controlled slaves(who don't want to admit they're slaves and dupes, and are quite offended by the suggestion they are...of course...I was a believer in many of the lies myself, like the holocaust fraud, and initially the 9-11 story).

 

One needs to overcome the programming of "crimestop"(George Orwell's novel "1984"). Fear of being ostracized or worse(like losing employment and friends, and even fear of going insane). The mindfuck they're playing on people is diabolical.

 

What is "crimestop"?

"The mind should develop a blind spot whenever a dangerous thought presented itself. The process should be automatic, instinctive. Crimestop, they called it in Newspeak. . . . He set to work to exercise himself in crimestop. He presented himself with propositions—'the Party says the Earth is flat', 'the Party says that ice is heavier than water'—and trained himself in not seeing or not understanding the arguments that contradicted them."

 

"Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity." (1984)

 

 

Heretics and heresy must be rooted out and snuffed out. (for the "greater good" of course). (the greater good of the "lords" and "masters" actually).

 

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

See also: "Zersetzung"

 

DEFINITION:

 

"The Ministry for State Security (German: Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, MfS), commonly known as the Stasi, was the main security service of the German Democratic Republic (East Germany or GDR), and defined Zersetzung in its 1985 dictionary of political operatives as

... a method of operation by the Ministry for State Security for an efficacious struggle against subversive activities, particularly in the treatment of operations. With Zersetzung one can influence hostile and negative individuals across different operational political activities, especially the hostile and negative aspects of their dispositions and beliefs, so these are abandoned and changed little by little, and, if applicable, the contradictions and differences between the hostile and negative forces would be laid open, exploited, and reinforced.

 

The goal of Zersetzung is the fragmentation, paralysis, disorganization, and isolation of the hostile and negative forces, in order to preventatively impede the hostile and negative activities, to largely restrict, or to totally avert them, and if applicable to prepare the ground for a political and ideological reestablishment.

 

Zersetzung is equally an immediate constitutive element of "operational procedures" and other preventive activities to impede hostile gatherings. The principal force employed to implement Zersetzung are the unofficial collaborators. Zersetzung presupposes information and significant proof of hostile activities planned, prepared, and accomplished as well as anchor points corresponding to measures of Zersetzung.

 

Zersetzung must be produced on the basis of a root cause analysis of the facts and the exact definition of a concrete goal. Zersetzung must be executed in a uniform and supervised manner; its results must be documented.

The political explosive force of Zersetzung heightens demands regarding the maintenance of secrecy.

The term Zersetzung is generally translated into English as "decomposition", although it can be variously translated as "decay", "corrosion", "undermining", "biodegradation", or "dissolution". The term was first used in a prosecutorial context in Nazi Germany, namely as part of the term Wehrkraftzersetzung (or Zersetzung der Wehrkraft). In Western parlance, Zersetzung can be described as the active application of psychological destabilisation procedures by the State apparatus."

 

From wikipedia(who of course will want you to assume/believe these operations "ended" with the "end" of the "Cold War"...).

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zersetzung

 

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

IT'S THE SAME CONSCIOUSNESS THAT WENT AFTER HIM, WITH THE SAME TACTICS. UPDATED AND GLOBALIZED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The "house of desolation", and The Larger Thing that was operating through him:

 

 

theworld.jpg

Edited by novymir
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, "sin" means delusion, believing and perceiving things that are not true and therefore not real, WartWorld isn't really there...but that's what our (separated)consciousness is dreaming up, it only "exists" as a Dream of Deceit. What's actually there is a dead spot, unconscious, a numb spot that has had communication with The Larger part of us momentarily interrupted, interfered with, distorted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

News

 

"Legal action against Richard D. Hall"

"I (Richard D. Hall) appeared at a High Court Hearing on Monday 29th January 2024. The Hearing was to determine the outcome of the Claimant's Application to accept without question the official narrative of the Manchester bombing, and thus prevent me from presenting any evidence which challenges the official narrative at a trial."

 

Judgment

This judgment was handed down remotely at 10.00 am on 8 February 2024 by circulation to the parties or their representatives by e-mail and by release to the National Archives.

http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/KB-2023-002102_Hibbert v Richard Hall.pdf

 

 

The case is ongoing.

https://www.richplanet.net

 

 

 

 

freemasonscum.jpeg

Edited by novymir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

UKColumn have taken an interest in RDH court hearings and devotes the first 00:10:30 of the show and provides some in depth background info about the case and its further potential implications with respect to citizen journalism, the Judge appears to be lagging behind the times in terms of 'staged events', one might point the Judge to 911 for a lesson on this subject as an example.

 

UK Column

UK Column News - 9th February 2024

Mike Robinson, Debi Evans and Ben Rubin with today's UK Column News.

Duration 01:01:52

https://www.bitchute.com/video/zWTCSBx0gif9/

 

zWTCSBx0gif9_640x360.webp.d1abc1c67e74e12ad24550360e516d5f.webp

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, xpwales said:

Came across the following video exposing a potential crisis actor at the Manchester event (not sure of it's validity but worth sharing)...

 

"MANCHESTER ARINA ACTOR / JUDGE RINDER ACTOR AND LYAR - NICK BICKERSTAFF"

https://www.bitchute.com/video/G83ncoJs2QdN/

 

https://www.tvzoneuk.com/post/exclusive-judge-rinder-cases-fake-and-performed-by-actors

 

Was posted earlier in the thread. It is a good video though, and absolutely no doubt the same piece of sh@t. One of the worst 'acting' performances ever recorded too so I hope he has other means of income 😀

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/6/2022 at 11:31 PM, Truthblast said:

 

Try this one:

 

 

Ha ! Ha ! Ha! Thank you for this comedy gold moment. I laughed so hard i just shit myself. Maybe they should change the C in BBC to comedy, or conspiracy, or crappy crapshooting

Intresting how bbc is actually controlled by the paedophile nazi royals, as are most institutions in britain:

" The Royal Charter is the constitutional basis for the BBC. It sets out the BBC’s Object, Mission and Public Purposes. The Charter also outlines the Corporation’s governance and regulatory arrangements, including the role and composition of the BBC Board. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Its quite similar to Andrew's claims he was in Pizza Express - the security could prove it instantly from their records of his movements.

 

Its up to the Claimants to prove what Richard Hall is accusing them of is untrue. Show the CCTV evidence. It doesnt have to be in the public domain, if its too gory or upsetting, but the entire case rests on it. The whole incident would have been captured on CCTV in real time, from many different angles, as well as the damage and injuries that Hall is refuting. He's done his bit in providing images and footage from copious hours and hours of research, that go against the official narrative. It's now up to the judge to review the unseen camera footage and relay the evidence of it in a summary to decide this case once and for all, in a truthful and honourable way in accordance with their Law. So far they have offered nothing in terms of proof that the event occured as has been reported, to prove Hall wrong, which they could do easily if they have the video evidence. So the ball is in their court.

 

Amazing how similar these two are...are they related?

 

 

ansell.jpg

Edited by northern star
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, northern star said:

Its quite similar to Andrew's claims he was in Pizza Express - the security could prove it instantly from their records of his movements.

 

Its up to the Claimants to prove what Richard Hall is accusing them of is untrue. Show the CCTV evidence. It doesnt have to be in the public domain, if its too gory or upsetting, but the entire case rests on it. The whole incident would have been captured on CCTV in real time, from many different angles, as well as the damage and injuries that Hall is refuting. He's done his bit in providing images and footage from copious hours and hours of research, that go against the official narrative. It's now up to the judge to review the unseen camera footage and relay the evidence of it in a summary to decide this case once and for all, in a truthful and honourable way in accordance with their Law. So far they have offered nothing in terms of proof that the event occured as has been reported, to prove Hall wrong, which they could do easily if they have the video evidence. So the ball is in their court.

 

Amazing how similar these two are...are they related?

 

 

ansell.jpg

 

The idea that the images "are too gory or upsetting" is BS. They just use these ridiculous presumptuous assumptions as a sort of steering and limiting people's thinking, telling them what they should think and feel. 

 

(Look at all the ("fictional") horror, crime, and etc on TV and movie garbage they subject themselves to...hahaha...that sh-t is "causing harm" on a daily basis by programing people's minds to "derive pleasure" from horror etc, they're telling their mind "I enjoy this" horror etc, so then what? it's predictive programming.) Their perceived "reality" is being manipulated  subconsciously with that garbage.

 

Supposedly "adults" would be aware of the violent and grotesque nature of this world, and know they're not living in Candy Land, where everything is always "Rainbows and Butterflies".

 

But of course, mature, reasonable, and wise adults are not what they want to program the population to be...in fact the opposite. So then they can say..."...oh it's too distressing to show the public..." ...and keep their predator/parasite game going.

Using false-flags to justify their ever growing control and privilege.

 

Isn't that conveeenient...!

 

Our mommies and daddies in the government are "protecting us"......don't you feeel the "love"...haha...! (gag-puke! yuck!).

 

btw; who's the dude on the left?

 

 

 

 

Edited by novymir
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, novymir said:

 

The idea that the images "are too gory or upsetting" is BS. They just use these ridiculous presumptuous assumptions as a sort of steering and limiting people's thinking, telling them what they should think and feel. 

 

(Look at all the ("fictional") horror, crime, and etc on TV and movie garbage they subject themselves to...hahaha...that sh-t is "causing harm" on a daily basis by programing people's minds to "derive pleasure" from horror etc, they're telling their mind "I enjoy this" horror etc, so then what? it's predictive programming.) Their perceived "reality" is being manipulated  subconsciously with that garbage.

 

Supposedly "adults" would be aware of the violent and grotesque nature of this world, and know they're not living in Candy Land, where everything is always "Rainbows and Butterflies".

 

But of course, mature, reasonable, and wise adults are not what they want to program the population to be...in fact the opposite. So then they can say..."...oh it's too distressing to show the public..." ...and keep their predator/parasite game going.

Using false-flags to justify their ever growing control and privilege.

 

Isn't that conveeenient...!

 

Our mommies and daddies in the government are "protecting us"......don't you feeel the "love"...haha...! (gag-puke! yuck!).

 

btw; who's the dude on the left?

 

 

 

 

Agree totally. They mollycoddle us when it comes to these events (which would expose them) yet expose us to all other kinds of violent atrocities, on a daily basis.

Well said Novymir.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing too, it's not just the exposing that he does, it's also the thought processing he uses while going through it. 

 

His background as an electrical engineer is an asset, whereas in that field one needs to use genuine logic and cannot rely on guesses or try to fudge stuff, it's gotta be "right" or it won't work...and that could be a complete waste of time and money or even fatal, so one needs to "know" what is what, and how it works, both physically, in practice, and theoretically.

 

So he's a kind of teacher too, and "they" don't want us to learn how he does it. 

 

 

 

If it was a fair fight, Richard D. Hall would mop up the floor with those clowns, and he could probably do it one-handed...I don't know about having both hands tied behind his back>>>>>but we already know he won no matter what. (whaaaa! Ellen!...Ellen!....ahhh! Ellen!!!.....bla, bla, bla...).

 

 

 

 

 

bizarro_world.jpg

Edited by novymir
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, northern star said:

Its quite similar to Andrew's claims he was in Pizza Express - the security could prove it instantly from their records of his movements.

 

Its up to the Claimants to prove what Richard Hall is accusing them of is untrue. Show the CCTV evidence. It doesnt have to be in the public domain, if its too gory or upsetting, but the entire case rests on it. The whole incident would have been captured on CCTV in real time, from many different angles, as well as the damage and injuries that Hall is refuting. He's done his bit in providing images and footage from copious hours and hours of research, that go against the official narrative. It's now up to the judge to review the unseen camera footage and relay the evidence of it in a summary to decide this case once and for all, in a truthful and honourable way in accordance with their Law. So far they have offered nothing in terms of proof that the event occured as has been reported, to prove Hall wrong, which they could do easily if they have the video evidence. So the ball is in their court.

 

Amazing how similar these two are...are they related?

 

 

ansell.jpg

 

Someone that speaks the truth has no need to deflect and hide behind his Daughter and the suffering that she has endured, and to promote this defense clearly and unmistakably for public outrage against RDH, to paint a picture within the minds and hearts of others that are curious about the case, i'll just leave this statement from Martin to do all the explaining about his own intent which clearly demonstrates a weak defense on his behalf, something to hide?, i feel there is much more to come from this case, keep going RDH, 👍

 

Quote: 00:19:39 - 00:19:50
"you can probably tell, i get emotional, but, you know he's gonna, he's gonna learn, a very painful lesson, errr and i won't take prisoners, and he's gotta be ready for that"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, xpwales said:
21 hours ago, novymir said:

btw; who's the dude on the left?

I believe it's Nicola Bulley's partner.

Yes indeed, when I saw the video of Martin Hibbert talking to the Garraway woman on Richard's website, he looked exactly like Paul Ansell.

At the time of Nicola Bulley's disappearance there was a lot of speculation about the possibility of Paul Ansell being a crisis actor.

Ok he is doing a different accent for his Martin character, his beard is more unkempt, but I feel it is the same person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Why said:

Yes indeed, when I saw the video of Martin Hibbert talking to the Garraway woman on Richard's website, he looked exactly like Paul Ansell.

At the time of Nicola Bulley's disappearance there was a lot of speculation about the possibility of Paul Ansell being a crisis actor.

Ok he is doing a different accent for his Martin character, his beard is more unkempt, but I feel it is the same person.

There's a striking resemblance between the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...