Jump to content

Richard D Hall


alexa

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Malbec said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65136825

 

Marianas spring and the bbc warning conspiracy theorists not to question anything or they'll get sued ūüôĄ

 

This strongly suggests that Richard did get close to at least some of the truth.

 

Somebody is nervous about the truth.

 

Very very nervous.

 

If there was nothing there then the fricking BBC wouldn't mobilize like this.

 

Ms Spring is NOT CONVINCING in the slightest.

 

She doesn't give two shits about the victims.

 

If she did care she would go through Richard's work POINT BY POINT and try to ascertain whether there is SOMETHING there.

 

This isn't journalism.

 

BBC have discredited themselves.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "scribes"(news media) are hypocrites, and do the bidding of the pharasiac(false authority(inverted)) consciousness that owns those entities and the governments.

 

Everything they/it say about Richard D. Hall is a lie, everything they project onto him is what they themselves are guilty(complicit) of, but 1000+ times more harmful and sinister.

 

They rely on The Big Lie. They are a part of it. The maintanance of it.

 

Artificial-intelligence(egoic) has been operating and dominating in this world since the beginning, without it, this world ceases to "be".

 

This "world" itself is The Big Lie, but in terms of actual size it's the tiniest thing there is, the only finite thing there is, passing itself off in oh-so-big delusions of "infinite" granduer. And it cons the dreamers to believe and keep dreaming The Big Lie.

 

It cons them to value garbage, even identify with it. EgoMatrix---Experience of Shit. That's where it always leads. Mild as it may have started, that's where it leads, because otherwise it would be "boring"...and this world promises "something new", "something different", "something special", and all it can do is then offer shit, dressed up as "not shit". "Precious shit", because that's the one thing not present or available in Reality--(oh, how boring and restrictive!).

 

Hahahahaha!

 

 

 

 

Edited by novymir
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, novymir said:

The "scribes"(news media) are hypocrites, and do the bidding of the pharasiac(false authority(inverted)) consciousness that owns those entities and the governments.

 

Everything they/it say about Richard D. Hall is a lie, everything they project onto him is what they themselves are guilty(complicit) of, but 1000+ times more harmful and sinister.

 

They rely on The Big Lie. They are a part of it. The maintanance of it.

 

Artificial-intelligence(egoic) has been operating and dominating in this world since the beginning, without it, this world ceases to "be".

 

This "world" itself is The Big Lie, but in terms of actual size it's the tiniest thing there is, the only finite thing there is, passing itself off in oh-so-big delusions of "infinite" granduer. And it cons the dreamers to believe and keep dreaming The Big Lie.

 

It cons them to value garbage, even identify with it. EgoMatrix---Experience of Shit. That's where it always leads. Mild as it may have started, that's where it leads, because otherwise it would be "boring"...and this world promises "something new", "something different", "something special", and all it can do is then offer shit, dressed up as "not shit". "Precious shit", because that's the one thing not present or available in Reality--(oh, how boring and restrictive!).

 

Hahahahaha!

 

 

 

 

 

They can't exactly admit to what they did can they?

 

"We blew up the World Trade Center Towers."

 

"We financed most terror groups in the last 50 years."

 

"We barged into the Middle East explicitly to cause millions of deaths and untold wounded."

 

"We staged the bombing at the Manchester Arena."

 

"When future bad shit happens, 9 times out of 10 it will be US that makes it happen."

 

Oh no no no...

 

ITS THEM DISASTER TROLLING CONSPIRACY TERRISTS THAT ARE THE PROBLEM!

 

THEY ARE TROLLING US!

 

FOR WE ENEMIES OF HUMANITY... ARE THE DISASTER THAT IS BEING TROLLED!

Edited by Truthblast
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted here, thanks to @Nemo for bringing to attention

https://forum.davidicke.com/index.php?/topic/27352-minor-news-items-not-worth-a-thread-of-their-own/&do=findComment&comment=491394

 

Manchester Arena survivors to take 'disaster troll' to court

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65136825

 

bbcmab.webp.ef47a771935ad83cfea1f27958656807.webp

 

Now this will be a case to keep an eye on, it is about harassment and to my mind has MI5 written all over it to steer the thinking away from whether the event actually happened or as a training exercise that went horribly wrong.

 

Quote from article:

'Martin and Eve Hibbert, who were left with severe disabilities after the 2017 blast, are suing Richard D Hall for defamation and harassment.

It is the first time such action has been launched in the UK against a conspiracy theorist.

Mr Hall did not respond to the BBC's request for comment.'

 

Lots of stuff to decode in this latest epic piece of drivel from the BullshittingBastardClub

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, sock muppet said:

Lots of stuff to decode in this latest epic piece of drivel from the BullshittingBastardClub

 

 

1) Why is Marianna Spring handling all this - she is barely 27, shows little sign of intelligence, has no relevant degree (studied French and Russian at Oxford... very James Bond...) and where is the REST of the BBC??? Only "M" knows how to handle ZE DIZIIINFORMATIONZZZ?

 

2) Did Marianna eat her bugz today, so Master Noseswab doesn't spank her over his knee?

 

3) Is she being highly paid to f*ck up a few CONSPEEERACY TERRTISTS only to pull a DISAPPEARING ACT 3 years later, and live off the FAT of what she was paid?

 

4) Why does this woman ACT AGHAST THAT PEOPLE WHO AREN'T LIARS ARE EXCERCISING THEIR GOD-GIVEN RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH? VERBOTEN ZAT YES?

 

5) Why do they keep prattling on and on about Richard being THE SON OF A CHICKENFARMER - the correspondents on BBC International look like they FELL OUT OF THE BACK OF A WAREHOUSE TRUCK...

 

6) Why did Arianna Grande make her blasphemous GOD IS A WOMAN music video?

 

7) DISNEY was involved - is Marianna Spring a Skywalker? The female JEDI who swings her purple lightsaber at CONSBEERACY TERRISTS FROM ZE NEW ORDER? Will she get a role in the next 3RD RATE STAR WARS SPINOFF MOVIE?

 

MASTER YODEL: USE ZE FORZE MARIANNA!!! SWINGZ ZE ZABER!!! CHOP ZE BUGZ HARD!!!

 

LOL¬†¬†ūü§£

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One question: has Richard D Hall ever said these victims did not suffer injuries as a result of what happened at the Manchester Arena? Because saying the event was staged, false-flag, drill-gone-wrong, is not the same as saying it didn't happen. Has he said nobody was injured by the blast?

 

Because as we know, the alphabet agencies are prepared for "collateral damage" when carrying out various things.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard said in one of his shows that his arena bomb book has been out for years, the BBC hassle started just after he began investigating something in Manchester in July 2022 but he wouldn't say anything further. Can anyone think what it is?  It's obviously rattled them big time they're going all out after Hall trying to nail him.

I've had a look through the news but nothing stands out to me that Hall would be interested in. Some grooming gang got busted, a few stabbings and a drive by shooting, typical manchester events really.

The show he makes the comment is Ukraine : The Just War. Can anyone think what it is?

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

One question: has Richard D Hall ever said these victims did not suffer injuries as a result of what happened at the Manchester Arena? Because saying the event was staged, false-flag, drill-gone-wrong, is not the same as saying it didn't happen. Has he said nobody was injured by the blast?

 

Because as we know, the alphabet agencies are prepared for "collateral damage" when carrying out various things.

 

I think his theory is that there was no evidence of damage from a bomb, and if you look into it, there isnt. The hall (which had lots of glass features) where the bomb went off had no broken glass or structural damage in the photos which were released, supposedly shortly after the explosion.  Not that people werent damaged or killed "elsewhere". Some big Illuminati ritual no doubt went down that night, just not as its being reported. And that's what theyre covering up.

 

 

 

Edited by northern star
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, factJack said:

Can anyone think what it is?  It's obviously rattled them big time they're going all out after Hall trying to nail him.

 

Saving face in a desperate attempt to reclaim the moral high command of feeding people utter garbage to remain status quo relevant to do so, the dying embers of a bankrupt system that has fed them well, along with the usual trimmings that come with such high accolade of pageantry and absolutely nothing to do with truth.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

One question: has Richard D Hall ever said these victims did not suffer injuries as a result of what happened at the Manchester Arena? Because saying the event was staged, false-flag, drill-gone-wrong, is not the same as saying it didn't happen. Has he said nobody was injured by the blast?

 

If I remember correctly he said that no photos, CCTV images or other hard evidence of actual killed or wounded people was released.

 

Also the private security firm at the Arena BLOCKED all outside entry into the foyer about 10 minutes before the blast.

 

Also the flash/fireworks seen going off in the foyer does NOT match the type of explosive that was puportedly used.

 

Then there is that screaming weirdo who filmed himself on his smartphone claiming that something terrible has happened and he "can't find his daughter" - everyone else around him is calm and they even make fun of his screaming...

 

Why doesn't he call his daughter instead of filming himself?

 

 

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Malbec said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65201949

 

Marianna Spring seems to be relentless in the mission she has been tasked with.... she's seems to be clearly misquoting someone called Neil Sanders who Hall has previously worked with, since it is quoted as such a small snippet. And she is continuing to melodranatically feign concern for "victims"... ūüôĄ¬†

 

Richard has a quite academic style approach to his work.

 

They compare him to Alex Jones who shouts through bullhorns and engages in histrionic spectacle.

 

Also, when a news organization uses stylized Photoshopped images of a person one needs to be wary that a character assassination attempt is in the works.

 

All of this will likely only make Richard more widely known and popular online.

 

But the will want to slap him with a ridiculous fine and use him as the Bogeyman for new DISINFORMATION LAWS.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that Neil Sanders has been quoted in the BBC link ūü§Ēūü§Ē

 

Is that real? Has Neil Sanders helped the BBC and thrown Richard under the bus??? Maybe he is saving his own neck by doing so.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, truther79 said:

Interesting that Neil Sanders has been quoted in the BBC link ūü§Ēūü§Ē

 

Is that real? Has Neil Sanders helped the BBC and thrown Richard under the bus??? Maybe he is saving his own neck by doing so.

Neil Sanders was also quoted in one of her previous articles, and I think he may have briefly appeared in her Panorama documentary, though I haven't seen it.

 

I've only seen a couple of Richard's shows where Neil was a guest, he's certainly an interesting character, coming across as an 'expert on psychological manipulation'.

 

He certainly got me interested in the subject and in many respects I think he is right. I do disagree with some of his views on subjects like Brexit, though I did spot the connection with figures involved in the Leave campaigns, such as Nigel Farage and Arron Banks (whatever happened to him?), who then jumped onto the Trump bandwagon in the USA.

 

But still, I found it 'strange' that someone like Sanders - being an expert in media propaganda and manipulation and all that - would agree to talk to the BBC in order to help them 'defame' a fellow 'truth-seeker', unless he was somehow also being 'misrepresented'?

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/3/2023 at 6:00 PM, sock muppet said:

Originally posted here, thanks to @Nemo for bringing to attention

https://forum.davidicke.com/index.php?/topic/27352-minor-news-items-not-worth-a-thread-of-their-own/&do=findComment&comment=491394

 

Manchester Arena survivors to take 'disaster troll' to court

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65136825

 

bbcmab.webp.ef47a771935ad83cfea1f27958656807.webp

 

Now this will be a case to keep an eye on, it is about harassment and to my mind has MI5 written all over it to steer the thinking away from whether the event actually happened or as a training exercise that went horribly wrong.

 

Quote from article:

'Martin and Eve Hibbert, who were left with severe disabilities after the 2017 blast, are suing Richard D Hall for defamation and harassment.

It is the first time such action has been launched in the UK against a conspiracy theorist.

Mr Hall did not respond to the BBC's request for comment.'

 

Lots of stuff to decode in this latest epic piece of drivel from the BullshittingBastardClub

 

Why does this guy remind me of Nicola Bulley's "husband"? Do all men now look like this?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Malbec said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65201949

 

Marianna Spring seems to be relentless in the mission she has been tasked with.... she's seems to be clearly misquoting someone called Neil Sanders who Hall has previously worked with, since it is quoted as such a small snippet. And she is continuing to melodranatically feign concern for "victims"... ūüôĄ¬†

She's really banging on with this....a clear agenda at play. How many articles is she going to milk out of this "story".

 

I'd say she's like a dog with a bone, but that might cause offence.

 

To dogs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

Why does this guy remind me of Nicola Bulley's "husband"? Do all men now look like this?

 

I did notice all the Nicola Bulley thread/posts but have not read a single one nor do i even know who she is, so i will have to get back to you on that one, ūüĎć

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...