Richard D Hall

[Grumpy Owl]

4 hours ago, xpwales said:

Iain Davies has published a new article on Richard D. Hall / Manchester - 3rd March 2024...

"The Manchester Arena False Flag"

https://off-guardian.org/2024/03/07/the-manchester-arena-false-flag/

 

 

Great article by Iain Davies, this part is the most telling bit of it and gives you an idea where they want this to lead:

 

Quote

In an interview aired on ITV’s Good Morning Britain (GMB), Martin Hibbert spoke about his relationship with Andy Burnham, the mayor of Manchester. Mr Hibbert stated that if he wins the case against Hall, he, Burnham and his legal team are seeking to use the ruling to push for the creation of a new criminal offence.

Hibbert and his supporters want to make it illegal to question any reported victim account of an alleged terrorist attack. If enacted, it will ensure that no investigative journalist can ever question State narratives about terror events. Once on the statute books, it is highly likely that the offence will be extended to prohibit the questioning of other State narratives, wherever it is claimed someone was harmed. Murder, for example.

 

Basically the Establishment can 'establish' any given narrative, and it will be illegal for anyone to question it, or indeed investigate it. Or even express a contrary opinion.

 

Yeah, I know much of the 'mainstream media' journalists don't really do much investigating as such, but this would really put an end to a lot of independent investigative journalism.

 

Mainstream media is already just parroting press releases, 'official announcements' and tweets without any questioning or deeper analysis.

 

 

[xpwales]

4 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

Basically the Establishment can 'establish' any given narrative, and it will be illegal for anyone to question it, or indeed investigate it. Or even express a contrary opinion.

 

Yeah, I know much of the 'mainstream media' journalists don't really do much investigating as such, but this would really put an end to a lot of independent investigative journalism.

 

Mainstream media is already just parroting press releases, 'official announcements' and tweets without any questioning or deeper analysis.

I would imaging that there are many who can see through false flag events and many who are just starting to see it (just like COVID), if these laws are enacted then with a bit of luck the Establishment could become complacent and stage too many false flags which exhibit more obvious contradictions and inconsistencies in the narrative, hopefully leading to a larger awaking.

Wishful thinking but it could be possible.

[novymir]

On 2/28/2024 at 7:24 AM, xpwales said:

Observe the pre-scripted response from the Deceptibot (Garraway) when Martin mentions Richard Hall's name at 10mins in...

 

Whoever invented the term "Deceptibot" is brilliant!  Haha, I'm gonna use it every chance I get.

Thanks!

[xpwales]

14 hours ago, novymir said:

Whoever invented the term "Deceptibot" is brilliant!  Haha, I'm gonna use it every chance I get.

Thanks!

It was copied from the Transformers Movie - "Decepticons", then changed to add a "press enter" (robotic) personality to it. 

[novymir]

Related...

 

Concerning false flags and staged hoaxes. Especially claimed "Islamist" ones.

 

There was an article posted at D.I.'s "news" site about a graveyard being vandalized with graffiti in France with "Islamic" taunts. That was in the Daily Mail.

 

I highly doubt it was muslims, unless they were being handled by a non-muslim shadow group. I'd call it a minor false-flag to keep "the enemy" within the minds of the population. But it's a secondary enemy, the result of actions of the primary enemy. Who brought them in?

 

They're obviously using the influx of "muslims/Arabs" as a weapon within.

 

Who benefits?

 

Who benefits from riots, chaos, civil war, and "terrorism" in Western societies? Iran, etc,etc? Get fvcking serious.

 

 

Musk was talking about how the illegals coming in is "laying the groundwork for something worse than 9-11".

 

Predictive programming. 

Turn up the chaos and insanity, and destruction, and then offer the predetermined "remedy".

 

Ordo-Ab-Chao.

 

They've (the scum that owns and operates the governments of the world) got all these potential patsies and possible candidates for manipulation available at their disposal within the Western(formerly known as "Christendom") countries. 

 

And as has been said before, the only time they tell the truth is by accident or to cover for a bigger lie.

 

This is a confession of a False Flag:

 

At 1:08 he says "......it's easy to put a truck bomb, as we did..[...err, oops...] was done, in London...".

 

 

 

 

"STAY SAFE" ?

Unbelievable Diabolicism.

 

Only in a Dream of Deceit. Inversion Land.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited March 13, 2024 by novymir

[Mitochondrial Eve]

Richard D Hall has provided an update about his legal case on his site today.

 

https://www.richplanet.net/legal.php

 

Prior to the latest update, a case management hearing took place on 13th March 2024 whereby a costs order was made against RDH for a sizeable sum of £21,000 plus VAT. The costs were incurred on the basis that, after the previous hearing of 29th January 2024, RDH lost the initial part of the case where it was considered whether he could present his evidence which he feels refutes the official narrative of the Manchester Bombing. The judge, Master Davison, concluded there was no reasonable prospect of success that RDH's evidence could overturn the findings of the public inquiry and the criminal conviction of Salman Abedi's brother Hashem Abedi as an accomplice to the crime.

 

Whilst RDH has not lost the entire case (it has yet to be decided at a trial hearing if he harassed the Hibberts, has breached GDPR and the Data Protection Act), he feels that it is paramount to his defence that he is able to present his investigation into the Manchester Bombing which he states was conducted in order to prevent or detect crime after he was approached by a whistleblower in July 2017.

 

At the case management hearing, Master Davison declined permission to appeal but said that RDH could raise this further with a more senior High Court judge. RDH submitted his appeal request accordingly but another judge, Mrs Justice Steyn, has also turned it down. RDH states on his website that he has now "applied for a Hearing at the High Court to apply to renew my Appeal, and a Hearing has been granted which should take place at the end of May 2024".

[Mitochondrial Eve]

RDH's interview with The Light has now been published - he is not happy and now concludes it is a limited hangout. RDH has this to say about it on his Telegram channel (I have kept typos in).

 

Quote

I have just read the recent piece about me in the Light Newspaper

 

No mention of the title of my book or films.

 

No mention of the name of my website Richplanet TV.

 

No link to how to find the films online.

 

No link to the court hearing transrcirpt.

 

https://cdn1.richplanet.net/pdf/transcript1.pdf

 

No mention of my appeal or the details of the appeal.

 

https://cdn1.richplanet.net/pdf/Appeal1.pdf

 

The only links provided were to a MSM article and a link to the words of the judge.

 

Pretty woeful.  Without any question this is limited hangout.

 

Page 5 ...
https://thelightpaper.co.uk/assets/pdf/Light-44-Apr-24-Web-Final.pdf

 

[Occulus5]

Not sure if this is really relevant to the post but it's still relating to Richard D Hall (maybe I should make a new thread), but as Richard has made his home "off grid" where he no longer uses a utlity company, I wonder, how is he able to pay for things like car insurance and tax on his car/s and other things which will require some kind of payment via their bank account?. How is he able to do these things when he says he doesn't have a bank account?. Or is he paying by cash via postal order at the post office?. From what he said in a show about advising people to take their money out of the bank (and good luck with that one I say), I'm assuming he no longer keeps his money in a bank. So how does he get around paying for certain things without a debit payment or cheque payment?. And how is he not harrased by TV licensing goons when he just throws his TV license letters in the bin?. The reason why most people pay it (which tbf is only 12 quid a month) is because they don't want to knocks at the door being thretend with a fine.

 

I use physical money everytime I go shopping or buy things from a shop, but there are some things which need to pay via bank account via debit card or direct debit, and there is no way around this as far as I'm aware. I had to pay for a family funeral recently and I decided to pay half of it with cash, and I looked a right divvy handing over nearly 2 grand in notes and my partner felt sorry for the poor lady having to count it all lol. I then decided to pay the rest off with my card because it would've taken me several trips to the cash machine to draw it all out, and the bank would've asked what I wanted to draw the money out for. The main reason why people keep their money in a bank account is because of interest. I would love to take my money out the bank, but sadly that's not an option because I often to pay for things online for my kids for things I can't pay in the shops. And how does Richard afford to pay for things when he doesn't have a regular full time job?. He has a son I beleive, so how does he afford clothes, toys etc?. Sellings Richplanet marchandise can't be paying for that.

Edited May 14, 2024 by Occulus5

[Mitochondrial Eve]

6 hours ago, Occulus5 said:

Not sure if this is really relevant to the post but it's still relating to Richard D Hall (maybe I should make a new thread), but as Richard has made his home "off grid" where he no longer uses a utlity company, I wonder, how is he able to pay for things like car insurance and tax on his car/s and other things which will require some kind of payment via their bank account?. How is he able to do these things when he says he doesn't have a bank account?. Or is he paying by cash via postal order at the post office?. From what he said in a show about advising people to take their money out of the bank (and good luck with that one I say), I'm assuming he no longer keeps his money in a bank. So how does he get around paying for certain things without a debit payment or cheque payment?.

 

I cannot speak for Richard D Hall's personal finances and nobody else presumably can either aside from the man himself. However, he definitely has at least one bank account because he is requesting bank transfers direct to a Barclays account in his name for donations towards his legal case.

 

https://www.richplanet.net/donatelegal.php

 

6 hours ago, Occulus5 said:

And how is he not harrased by TV licensing goons when he just throws his TV license letters in the bin?. The reason why most people pay it (which tbf is only 12 quid a month) is because they don't want to knocks at the door being thretend with a fine.

 

I have found it easy enough to avoid harassment from TV Licensing.

 

I don't watch television and complete a 'No Licence Needed' declaration - they leave me alone for two years and then send me a form to fill to confirm (again) that I do not need a licence. Black Belt Barrister seems to suggest that you don't even necessarily need to complete the declaration but it does seem to stop the harassment so I prefer to do so for a quiet life. Granted, when I first stopped my payments and completed the declaration, there were initially some threatening letters in bold red - but, when I complained formally in writing, they pretty quickly apologised and claimed there had been some sort of admin error (the wrong button had been pressed or something...).

 

If they were to turn up, I would probably invite them in and show them my set up and that I genuinely don't watch TV. I would ask to film them before letting them in though so that they don't pull any funny business.

 

6 hours ago, Occulus5 said:

And how does Richard afford to pay for things when he doesn't have a regular full time job?. He has a son I beleive, so how does he afford clothes, toys etc?. Sellings Richplanet marchandise can't be paying for that.

 

RDH made a video during the Scamdemic explaining about how he came to buy his house in Wales on the cheap, the work he has done on it to provide off grid capabilities and how he has achieved paying off the mortgage he had (which was only £28,000). RDH supplemented his meagre self employed earnings of £7,500 to £10,000 per year with Working Tax Credit and describes himself as a "miser". It helps being able to do the improvements oneself as RDH can and he also inherited from his late mother.

 

https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=289&part=1&gen=99

[Occulus5]

Thanks for info about the TV license Yes I guess it's best to notify them in writing stating I don't have a TV or watch rather than just ignore letters and go through the ordeal of harassing knocks at the door which I don't want. I have seen some of Black Belt Barrister's videos and "Chilli Con Carne" or whatever he calls himself, but I don't trust them. These youtube channels seem to have very large subs and viewers.

 

As for RDH, but I was under the impression he doesn't have any bank account at all, because in one of his shows a few years ago when he was talking about his off grid home he advised people to take their money out of the bank, so I just thought he no longer has a bank account. How would anyone be able to gain employment working for a company without a bank account? unless they were paying you cash in hand.

[Mitochondrial Eve]

13 hours ago, Occulus5 said:

Thanks for info about the TV license Yes I guess it's best to notify them in writing stating I don't have a TV or watch rather than just ignore letters and go through the ordeal of harassing knocks at the door which I don't want. I have seen some of Black Belt Barrister's videos and "Chilli Con Carne" or whatever he calls himself, but I don't trust them. These youtube channels seem to have very large subs and viewers.

 

I don't entirely trust Black Belt Barrister either because he is chummy with Charlie Veitch who is widely considered an agent in conspiracy circles.

 

Having said that, I think Black Belt Barrister's legal content, given that he is registered as a barrister and regulated by the Bar Standards Board, can be trusted as representative of the mainstream view of the law and our legal system. He does provide some useful tips on some areas such as TV Licensing and parking penalties. And, unpopular as this may be within the alternative sphere, he is correct about the nonsense put out by the FotL / Sovereign Citizens / "common law" cultists etc even if he gets a bad rap from them including the likes of Richard Vobes.

 

13 hours ago, Occulus5 said:

As for RDH, but I was under the impression he doesn't have any bank account at all, because in one of his shows a few years ago when he was talking about his off grid home he advised people to take their money out of the bank, so I just thought he no longer has a bank account. How would anyone be able to gain employment working for a company without a bank account? unless they were paying you cash in hand.

 

RDH doesn't work for a company as far as I am aware but rather works for himself. I assume he must still need a bank account in order to receive payment from the sales he makes - maybe he withdraws it afterwards at intervals.

 

Aside from what RDH has said publicly, I am not sure how anyone other than RDH can really answer these questions about his finances other than with a considerable dose of speculation.

[Fool Me Once]

14 hours ago, Occulus5 said:

Thanks for info about the TV license Yes I guess it's best to notify them in writing stating I don't have a TV or watch rather than just ignore letters and go through the ordeal of harassing knocks at the door which I don't want. I have seen some of Black Belt Barrister's videos and "Chilli Con Carne" or whatever he calls himself, but I don't trust them. These youtube channels seem to have very large subs and viewers.

 

As for RDH, but I was under the impression he doesn't have any bank account at all, because in one of his shows a few years ago when he was talking about his off grid home he advised people to take their money out of the bank, so I just thought he no longer has a bank account. How would anyone be able to gain employment working for a company without a bank account? unless they were paying you cash in hand.

 

On the contrary the best way of interacting with the pedo-*bbc is to NOT interact with them.

 

(*bbc - sponsored by pfizer)

 

Ignore their poxy junkmail,just as they ignored the Anti-Lockdown protests.

 

Chilli Jon Carne has broken their fear-spell on many,including me and as a show of appreciation I often run a vid of his to let the adverts play out (volume down and busy elsewhere) till they finish.

 

I despise tv in 2024 and wouldn't watch it if you paid me;give me classic uncensored sitcoms on dvd or memorycard.

[Grumpy Owl]

On 5/14/2024 at 8:37 PM, Mitochondrial Eve said:

I have found it easy enough to avoid harassment from TV Licensing.

 

I don't watch television and complete a 'No Licence Needed' declaration - they leave me alone for two years and then send me a form to fill to confirm (again) that I do not need a licence. Black Belt Barrister seems to suggest that you don't even necessarily need to complete the declaration but it does seem to stop the harassment so I prefer to do so for a quiet life. Granted, when I first stopped my payments and completed the declaration, there were initially some threatening letters in bold red - but, when I complained formally in writing, they pretty quickly apologised and claimed there had been some sort of admin error (the wrong button had been pressed or something...).

 

If they were to turn up, I would probably invite them in and show them my set up and that I genuinely don't watch TV. I would ask to film them before letting them in though so that they don't pull any funny business.

 

I cancelled my TV licence in March 2020. I too no longer watch any broadcast television, and I do not use BBC's iPlayer to watch any live broadcasts.

 

Yes, it is true that you are expected to complete a 'No Licence Needed' declaration every two years, and just recently I had my second one, which I submitted online.

 

In the last four years, I have never received any 'threatening' letters, nor have I had anyone knocking on my door unannounced.

[Occulus5]

On 5/16/2024 at 8:46 PM, Grumpy Owl said:

 

I cancelled my TV licence in March 2020. I too no longer watch any broadcast television, and I do not use BBC's iPlayer to watch any live broadcasts.

 

Yes, it is true that you are expected to complete a 'No Licence Needed' declaration every two years, and just recently I had my second one, which I submitted online.

 

In the last four years, I have never received any 'threatening' letters, nor have I had anyone knocking on my door unannounced.

I'm confused. According to some people, the license is just for watching BBC broadcasts, but according to their website they state:

"The law says you need to be covered by a TV Licence to:

• watch or record TV on any channel - via any TV service (e.g. Sky, Virgin, BT, Freeview, Freesat)
• watch TV live on any streaming service (e.g. ITVX, Channel 4, YouTube, Amazon Prime Video, Now TV, Sky Go)
• watch BBC iPlayer*.

On any device."

 

So basically I can't watch Netflix, Amazon Prime etc on my tablet or a PC unless I have a TV license?

Edited May 18, 2024 by Occulus5

[Grumpy Owl]

3 minutes ago, Occulus5 said:

So basically I can't watch Netflix, Amazon Prime etc on my tablet or a PC unless I have a TV license?

 

You do not need a TV licence unless you are using those services to stream TV channels as they are broadcasting, BBC, ITV, C4 etc etc.

[Occulus5]

11 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

You do not need a TV licence unless you are using those services to stream TV channels as they are broadcasting, BBC, ITV, C4 etc etc.

Si it's just for TV channels not watching streaming sites like Netfix or Amazon Prime etc?.

[Occulus5]

It says they visit you to check whether you watch TV or not. I still have a TalkTalk TV box, but I cancelled it and my landline months ago but for some reason TalkTalk still haven't disconnected my landline as it's still working. Haven't tried the TalkTalk box, but I've never watched TV for months.

 

These youtube videos talking about all this never mention all the rigmamole you have to go through to prove you don't watch TV, yet they try and put the shits up people by showing videos (which maybe staged) of TV license enforcers harassing people at their front door. I really doubt that Richard D Hall has TV license people come into his living room checking to see if he's got a TV lol.

Edited May 18, 2024 by Occulus5

[Mazthehobo]

3 hours ago, Occulus5 said:

I'm confused. According to some people, the license is just for watching BBC broadcasts, but according to their website they state:

"The law says you need to be covered by a TV Licence to:

• watch or record TV on any channel - via any TV service (e.g. Sky, Virgin, BT, Freeview, Freesat)
• watch TV live on any streaming service (e.g. ITVX, Channel 4, YouTube, Amazon Prime Video, Now TV, Sky Go)
• watch BBC iPlayer*.

On any device."

 

So basically I can't watch Netflix, Amazon Prime etc on my tablet or a PC unless I have a TV license?

Basically you can’t watch BBC or iPlayer ever.

You can’t watch anything being broadcast live (for example a football match on Amazon prime).

You can’t record anything being broadcast live to watch at a later time.

 

I have no license but watch Netflix, Disney and Amazon shows (all my brothers account!) because they are not live. 
 

YouTube I think is the same, in the sense that you can’t watch anything being broadcast live (for example United Stand channel where he streams live commentating on football games) but you can watch old Fleetwood Mac videos.

[Campion]

So who actually gets the TV licence money then, if it's used to control live broadcasts on all these other channels like amazon prime? If I was them I'd be lobbying for a slice of the cake - or better still privatising the whole thing and ending the tv licence. 

[Occulus5]

On 5/16/2024 at 8:46 PM, Grumpy Owl said:

 

I cancelled my TV licence in March 2020. I too no longer watch any broadcast television, and I do not use BBC's iPlayer to watch any live broadcasts.

 

Yes, it is true that you are expected to complete a 'No Licence Needed' declaration every two years, and just recently I had my second one, which I submitted online.

 

In the last four years, I have never received any 'threatening' letters, nor have I had anyone knocking on my door unannounced.

How to submit the declaration online?. I ticked every "No" box on the TV license website but nothing else happened.

[Grumpy Owl]

On 5/20/2024 at 9:38 AM, Occulus5 said:

How to submit the declaration online?. I ticked every "No" box on the TV license website but nothing else happened.

Where it asks "when do you plan to start watching live TV", make sure to click where it says "I have no plans at the moment", then the Continue button becomes available to click.

[Occulus5]

1 hour ago, Grumpy Owl said:

Where it asks "when do you plan to start watching live TV", make sure to click where it says "I have no plans at the moment", then the Continue button becomes available to click./.

Oh right ok thanks for that. Actually, there is no "I have no plans at the moment" in the list, or does that appear after you click  submit?. And also, do you click yes or no for: "Can you confirm that you and your household never record TV?"

 

 

Edited May 22, 2024 by Occulus5

[Occulus5]

On 5/22/2024 at 8:22 PM, Grumpy Owl said:

Where it asks "when do you plan to start watching live TV", make sure to click where it says "I have no plans at the moment", then the Continue button becomes available to click.

When I try and cancel the license it brings up a page where I need to enter an expiry date. The license was my late brother's name at the same address I am living at, and I don't know what the expiry date is as it doesn't say on the letter I receiving when the account was closed. It gives the license number but that's it. Is there any other way of informing them that I no longer need a license?. I thought this would've been pretty simple but it clearly isn't. I don't think they want to make it easy so people just give up and pay the license for the sake of any hassle.

[Occulus5]

Speaking of Richard D Hall and his off grid lifestyle, but I don't think what he has done with ever enter the ears and minds of regular normie public. Most people who live a humdrum, 9-5 lifestyle, running around trying to make ends meet just doing as they are told will think what Richard has done is either illegal or impractical or even ridiculous/and or unachievable. People like Richard are in the minority camp. What if you want to live off grid but you are disabled?. Most disabled people rely on govt help and funding, and they are the kind of people who slag the govt off but then go to the BBC moaning about how energy costs are affecting them and demanding something to be done lol. These people are completely clueless as to how the word really works, they are living in their own little bubble and don't realise they are under the thumb of a dictatorship, one soon to be a tecnocracy. I used to volunteer for a charity years ago, one of the people who used to help run this local disabled charity appeared on BBC breakfast this week regarding energy cost for disabled people like herself. These people think by crying wolf to the their local council, govt or the BBC will solve all their problems and put things right. These are the kind of people who campaign for disabilty rights and equality, but during Covid they were happily wearing their face nappies and abiding by all the silly Covid rules. These people don't realise that things like energy cost is all part of the control system.

[Grumpy Owl]

On 5/24/2024 at 10:49 AM, Occulus5 said:

When I try and cancel the license it brings up a page where I need to enter an expiry date. The license was my late brother's name at the same address I am living at, and I don't know what the expiry date is as it doesn't say on the letter I receiving when the account was closed. It gives the license number but that's it. Is there any other way of informing them that I no longer need a license?. I thought this would've been pretty simple but it clearly isn't. I don't think they want to make it easy so people just give up and pay the license for the sake of any hassle.

 

Oh, you didn't say you were trying to cancel a licence, the process is slightly different if you're just declaring you don't need one.

 

You say "when the account was closed" does that mean the license was already cancelled?

 

If you're not currently paying for a TV licence, and just want to declare that no licence is required at your property then go here:

https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/telling-us-you-dont-need-a-tv-licence