Pratt Handcock I’m a Celebrity - 🤔 How can we humanise our demons? 😷 - Give them a Mask 🎭

[bamboozooka]

5 hours ago, Malbec said:

He heavily promoted the vaccine on TV in 2020 (paid?) Pushing the well known objective of "getting normality back" And also does all those anti establishment monologues (where he uses a lot of eloquent words to say very little) whilst praising the queen.  It's hard to like or praise someone who's done a convenient u-turn after convincing people to get it, who are probably now irreversibly damaged. Same as fake Dr John Campbell, who incidentally in the YouTube comments some people actually say "my husband got it because of you" etc.... 

 

So its one thing being pro vaccine in an office or whatever, but publicly pushing it to a following is something quite different isn't it.  Blood on their hands 

oh yeah and what happened to the 5 african leaders that refused to give their ppl the jab.

[Malbec]

3 hours ago, bamboozooka said:

oh yeah and what happened to the 5 african leaders that refused to give their ppl the jab.

What's that got to do with Neil Oliver and all the other celebs who've pushed them  onto people.  do you mean that they had no choice other than to promote it or they would have been killed sorry if I'm missing the point... 

[DannyUK]

On 11/19/2022 at 11:25 PM, bamboozooka said:

what neil oliver speaks is not for us.

we already know

all his monologues are directed to the sheep.

he cant go full anti jew or he gets removed and that wouldnt help the sheep

 

but the its the jews crew can't get their heads around it.

 

Neil Oliver: This country must awaken to the realisation that we are being taken for fools

 

 

Eugenics. No pressure Globalists.

 

 

In other words…

 

Independent Thought Alarm

 

We will kill anyone who thinks independently.

The threat of not complying, the threat of non participation with the Globalist Plan.

Eugenics

The plan being developed as the foundation of Lockstep 2012…

 

 

Billionaires Try to Shrink World's Population, Report Says

By Robert Frank

May 26, 2009 11:57 am ET

 

Last week's meeting of the Great and the Good (or the Richest and Richer) was bound to draw criticism.

Associated Press

The New York meeting of billionaires Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Eli Broad, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah, Michael Bloomberg and others was described by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as an informal gathering aimed at encouraging philanthropy. Just a few billionaires getting together for drinks and dinner and a friendly chat about how to promote charitable giving.

There was no agenda, we were told. And no plan for a follow-up meeting.

 

But in an age of fallen wealth idols, it was inevitable that a meeting of billionaire minds would draw scrutiny. Surely all that money and power in one room had to spell trouble for the rest of us.

An article in the Times of London, headlined "Billionaire Club in Bid to Curb World Population," said the issues discussed in the top-secret meeting included health care, education and--by far the most controversial--slowing the global population growth.

"Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority," the article said, adding that "this could result in a challenge to some Third World politicians who believe contraception and female education weaken traditional values."

Such a stand wouldn't be surprising. Mssrs. Gates, Buffett and Turner have been quietly worrying about Malthusian population problems for years. Mr. Gates in February outlined a plan to try to cap the world's population at 8.3 billion people, rather than the projected 9.3 billion at which the population is expected to peak.

But some right-leaning blogs have started attacking the billionaires as forming a kind of secret sterilization society or giant ATM to fund abortions. It fed into time-honored fears of the rich using their wealth to reshape mankind in its preferred image. Some are raising the specter of eugenics.

I am not taking a stand on population control. But from what I was personally told about the meeting--and what the Times spells out further down in its story--population control was just one of many items raised during the meeting, as each philanthropist talked about what they were working on. It wasn't the reason for meeting and there are no real plans for a follow-up confab.

The notion that this secret gathering was aimed mostly at shrinking the world's population just doesn't ring true.

That said, almost all of the attendees are politically liberal. Do you think this Star Chamber of Philanthropists is something to worry about or something to be grateful for?

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-WHB-1322

 

They're called the Good Club - and they want to save the world

Sun 31 May 2009 00.01 BST

Paul Harris in New York reports on the small, elite group of billionaire philanthropists who met recently to discuss solving the planet's problems

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/may/31/new-york-billionaire-philanthropists

 

No pressure 

 

Planned Hunger Games Society

Edited November 22, 2022 by DannyUK

[sock muppet]

17 minutes ago, DannyUK said:

Neil Oliver: This country must awaken to the realisation that we are being taken for fools

 

Neil Oliver should also realise that for now they let him speak, he is after all paid by the [D]ark [S]ide actors, COFFrothchildsCOFF COFFOLLOXS

[DannyUK]

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

 

Neil Oliver should also realise that for now they let him speak, he is after all paid by the [D]ark [S]ide actors, COFFrothchildsCOFF COFFOLLOXS

I’d like to hear or see a video of him promoting the COVID narrative?

If you or anyone else here can provide one or two?

 

I’ve only recently listened to some of what he is saying and atm at least it seems to somewhat be identifying with what’s going on by the globalists and is taking a deeper look at what’s actually occurring and inspiring people to look at what’s gong in etc 

Ive heard him say in one video of his and I’ve only listened to a few, that he and his wife has had no vaccine and obviously nothing about him promoting such and an explanation of why it is he hasn’t had a vaccine if he indeed actually promoted them?

Which of course I’d imagine someone would explain why they’d be backing the vaccine if they say they’ve not had one themselves and are against them etc

 

 

Edited November 22, 2022 by DannyUK

[Malbec]

1 hour ago, DannyUK said:

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

 

Neil Oliver should also realise that for now they let him speak, he is after all paid by the [D]ark [S]ide actors, COFFrothchildsCOFF COFFOLLOXS

I’d like to hear or see a video of him promoting the COVID narrative?

https://hugotalks.com/2022/06/06/behold-the-contradiction-gb-news-neil-oliver-hugo-talks/

 

https://hugotalks.com/2022/10/16/they-cant-handle-the-truth-gbnews-hugo-talks/

 

For some reason thus other video will only share as a telegram link..... https://t.me/hugotalks/1263 I don't know if anyone else knows how to copying another way? 

[sock muppet]

12 hours ago, DannyUK said:

I’d like to hear or see a video of him promoting the COVID narrative?

If you or anyone else here can provide one or two?

 

I’ve only recently listened to some of what he is saying and atm at least it seems to somewhat be identifying with what’s going on by the globalists and is taking a deeper look at what’s actually occurring and inspiring people to look at what’s gong in etc 

Ive heard him say in one video of his and I’ve only listened to a few, that he and his wife has had no vaccine and obviously nothing about him promoting such and an explanation of why it is he hasn’t had a vaccine if he indeed actually promoted them?

Which of course I’d imagine someone would explain why they’d be backing the vaccine if they say they’ve not had one themselves and are against them etc

 

 

 

It's a case of, they build it up, to knock it down, and playing both sides of the equation, [D]ark [S]ide actors systematically destroying credibility of MSM while fostering the rise of the likes of GBNews, for now it serves the purpose of the people, but i am damn sure that at some critical moment to come, they will deceive again.

 

[DannyUK]

14 hours ago, Malbec said:

https://hugotalks.com/2022/06/06/behold-the-contradiction-gb-news-neil-oliver-hugo-talks/

 

https://hugotalks.com/2022/10/16/they-cant-handle-the-truth-gbnews-hugo-talks/

 

For some reason thus other video will only share as a telegram link..... https://t.me/hugotalks/1263 I don't know if anyone else knows how to copying another way? 

 

Thanks for the info.

I've never listened to GBN before seems like a definite controlled opposition, no question about that the pro vax stuff is completely disgusting 

Just recently hearing Neil Oliver, firstly on YT and never seen or heard of him before tbh and he does appear to be saying the right things but we do have contradictions here...

I'd certainly like to know why and whats going on here?

 

We should however be open to the idea that people can and have been duped by whats taking place like a lot of people and can see it now, so then they speak out about it and people will shut them down as being contradictory. They need to explain this, especially when it comes to the vaccine.

I do know if that's the case with Neil Oliver if it is, he will likely be removed from GBN very shortly.

 

This is most definitely Spiritual Warfare...

This is disgusting and removes all credibility for me, he needs to explain himself for such a turn around?

I see this flip-flopping without explanation as mind control and someone has now spun him to play the opposition role for whatever reason.

I guess we are either not supposed to have seen this, ignore or forget about it...

Unless I'm still missing something as someone who has drastically changed their view like this would explain themselves unless of course, they're a politician - Puppets - Under Mind Control, then no explanation would need to be necessary as they see no contradiction...

 

Listen to the same type of message in V for Vendetta...

 

When it comes to the Queen yes I definitely don't agree with his views and lip service.

It's like saying we have alternative views here but we can't have alternative views about this, in this case the Queen and we get a load of superficial claptrap.

They come together on matters of agenda, which is a big red flag.

When the matter of the death of the Queen and crowds upon crowds when just a few months ago you couldn't hug your nan, go to their funerals and when you could their ceremonies had to be drastically reduced - same for all ages but the elderly where most drastically being targeted.

This is a complete contradiction and only shows their contempt for us to me anyways. It's sickening and it maddens me also people who can't/don't see this.

 

On the other side of things, Hugo Talks would have more of a following - the type of people he is trying to communicate with - if he wasn't so condescending giving off an air of superiority.

Just my opinion, just are his views which when confused with truth, you won't be able to see past your own opinions...

Although, I certainly understand his frustrations if he has seen the likes of this and can't get it across to people.

It's likely because of his condescending tone and manner that he is getting in his own way and so he is banging his own head against a brick wall.

 

Edited November 22, 2022 by DannyUK

[Malbec]

44 minutes ago, DannyUK said:

This is disgusting and removes all credibility for me, he needs to explain himself for such a turn around?

It's frustrating because they don't explain themselves. If they went "on air" and apologised for their drastic mistake (maholtra included and Dr John Campbell too, although the latter I have watched less of) you would have more respect and it would seem that the turnaround / waking up theory may carry some weight. 

 

But its The timeliness of jab promotion- during rollout period, and criticising them now is neither here nor there really when at least half the population (if not more?) Have taken them.  

 

Dr John Campbell original pro vaccine vids are hard to find on YouTube I've noticed, whereas his recent excess death and questioning covid measures ones are suddenly all the rage. People in the comments must be quick to forget? I'm not sure, but during the fake pandemic he had a massive following for some bizarre reason. But he hasn't actually addressed the complete u turn, neither has Oliver. Maholtra claims its his dad dying which made him realise, but I struggle to buy that.  He's probably just trying to get sympathy. He's a qualified doctor who promoted an experimental unnecessary jab on live TV ffs and he hasn't once apologised for that (to my knowledge I stand to be corrected if he or any of them have oc) 

 

Thats why those Neil Oliver monologues just seem like a pointless load of shit to me as well, why say all that now on a weekly basis after pushing the jabs to innocent gullible retards (no offence) who watch TV and are influenced by what these people say, even worse so, watch GB news and think it's uber alternative. 

 

They tend to muddy the water these types of people, so people say "oh, they're on our side, I resonate with what he says" but it's too little too late. 

 

Sorry we've kinda derailed the thread topic

[DannyUK]

13 hours ago, Malbec said:

It's frustrating because they don't explain themselves. If they went "on air" and apologised for their drastic mistake (maholtra included and Dr John Campbell too, although the latter I have watched less of) you would have more respect and it would seem that the turnaround / waking up theory may carry some weight. 

 

But its The timeliness of jab promotion- during rollout period, and criticising them now is neither here nor there really when at least half the population (if not more?) Have taken them.  

 

Dr John Campbell original pro vaccine vids are hard to find on YouTube I've noticed, whereas his recent excess death and questioning covid measures ones are suddenly all the rage. People in the comments must be quick to forget? I'm not sure, but during the fake pandemic he had a massive following for some bizarre reason. But he hasn't actually addressed the complete u turn, neither has Oliver. Maholtra claims its his dad dying which made him realise, but I struggle to buy that.  He's probably just trying to get sympathy. He's a qualified doctor who promoted an experimental unnecessary jab on live TV ffs and he hasn't once apologised for that (to my knowledge I stand to be corrected if he or any of them have oc) 

 

Thats why those Neil Oliver monologues just seem like a pointless load of shit to me as well, why say all that now on a weekly basis after pushing the jabs to innocent gullible retards (no offence) who watch TV and are influenced by what these people say, even worse so, watch GB news and think it's uber alternative. 

 

They tend to muddy the water these types of people, so people say "oh, they're on our side, I resonate with what he says" but it's too little too late. 

 

Sorry we've kinda derailed the thread topic

 

No worries this is more than about that snivelling little weasel Matt Hancock.

We should all know here that Matt is simply the vehicle for this type of shit to come through as are a lot of other people.

Matt is just the representative of pushing this narrative here in the UK as he made himself the figurehead accountable at the time this all took place.

But it is not limited to him.

My point here is more to focus on the narrative of pushing the bs narrative that can't stand up to scrutiny more than simply a Matt character assassination, even though he justly deserves it anyhow this is about more than him as an individual but what he represents. 

I'm sure people like him get off on all the attention he is getting good and bad which is why he'd go in the jungle anyway.

But more than that I really do believe him and others are under the spell of mind control and are not their own people as we would imagine them to be, they're literally someone else's puppet. This would be a failsafe mechanism to stop people from growing a conscious and potentially speaking out in a manner that couldn't be controlled. They can also be used for scenarios where ordinary people couldn't keep a straight face or lie as well as they actually do as they don't believe or see themselves as lying they're hypnotised into believing what they're saying and doing is right/the right thing.

The true demons are the ones doing this, these people are puppets for the demons - Their Masks 

The fact he is in the jungle after all of this just shows the absolute utter contempt these people behind this have for us and Matt embodies this utter contempt as this is played out to us through him. Although if this is true, it maybe hard to view Matt as a victim maybe we should...

 

 

I'm glad to know about Neil Oliver to be aware that this maybe more than meets the eye, even though a lot of what he is saying of late I'd agree with, a perverse agenda and reasoning could exist for why this is taking place and on the surface. This seems it could have something to do with pushing the new economy/money. Although i have heard Neil Oliver speak out about the ID chips and cashless society, which again seems quite odd if this is what they're pushing. Maybe on some level he has become aware of whats taking place we will just have to see where this goes and be cautious...

 

The whole great reset bs following whats taken place is a controlled revolt/controlled revolution.

That much is clear so this can be why we are being told what we want to hear by a people who wish to control the revolt/movement from gaining any real traction outside the parameters of what's desired. Just say how many in the US are manipulated into supporting Trump to control those pushing back upon the establishment status quo because they have no other real option. It's all theatre and people feel good simply by being given an outlet, they'll use it because nothing else is otherwise open to them.

 

This video explains it quite well...

Before it actually occurred I might add.

But even with this, even though a lot of whats said is true, theres a reason this is being presented to us and I believe is done so in a controlled fashion by some of the same people carrying out what's going on, or by people who may have ulterior motives of their own for whats taking place but where insiders apart of the same inner core of people and again, these people this info is presented through are victims of mind control that the information is being presented through. All of this is apart and shows psychological warfare is taking place however we look at it...

 

 

Pushback 

 

 

Revolution 

 

 

Edited November 23, 2022 by DannyUK

[bamboozooka]

13 hours ago, Malbec said:

It's frustrating because they don't explain themselves. If they went "on air" and apologised for their drastic mistake (maholtra included and Dr John Campbell too, although the latter I have watched less of) you would have more respect and it would seem that the turnaround / waking up theory may carry some weight. 

 

But its The timeliness of jab promotion- during rollout period, and criticising them now is neither here nor there really when at least half the population (if not more?) Have taken them.  

 

Dr John Campbell original pro vaccine vids are hard to find on YouTube I've noticed, whereas his recent excess death and questioning covid measures ones are suddenly all the rage. People in the comments must be quick to forget? I'm not sure, but during the fake pandemic he had a massive following for some bizarre reason. But he hasn't actually addressed the complete u turn, neither has Oliver. Maholtra claims its his dad dying which made him realise, but I struggle to buy that.  He's probably just trying to get sympathy. He's a qualified doctor who promoted an experimental unnecessary jab on live TV ffs and he hasn't once apologised for that (to my knowledge I stand to be corrected if he or any of them have oc) 

 

Thats why those Neil Oliver monologues just seem like a pointless load of shit to me as well, why say all that now on a weekly basis after pushing the jabs to innocent gullible retards (no offence) who watch TV and are influenced by what these people say, even worse so, watch GB news and think it's uber alternative. 

 

They tend to muddy the water these types of people, so people say "oh, they're on our side, I resonate with what he says" but it's too little too late. 

 

Sorry we've kinda derailed the thread topic

 

just look at the sheepy comments on campbells videos. its vomitsville.

 

gbnews is controlled similar to russell brand. they can get away with saying so much, but theres a line they must'nt cross

 

gbnews might look like they are waking up normies but i can guarantee if a jabbed sheepie is watching steyn and he goes on

one about vax injuries they will turn off immediately as they can't handle hearing what they volunteered for is harmful 

 

ive got relatives ill caused by the jabs believing their illness is not caused by the jabs. im not sure whether it down to programming

or cognitive dissonance

[DannyUK]

17 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:

 

just look at the sheepy comments on campbells videos. its vomitsville.

 

gbnews is controlled similar to russell brand. they can get away with saying so much, but theres a line they must'nt cross

 

gbnews might look like they are waking up normies but i can guarantee if a jabbed sheepie is watching steyn and he goes on

one about vax injuries they will turn off immediately as they can't handle hearing what they volunteered for is harmful 

 

ive got relatives ill caused by the jabs believing their illness is not caused by the jabs. im not sure whether it down to programming

or cognitive dissonance

 

I'm sure it's mostly programming many people just can't accept this level of coordinated evil exists or that something given out for health via authorities could cause them harm and they won't do unless it's proven to be the case by some form of authority because they've surrendered their minds, which is what this is all about.

Even then, it's likely the sinister evil aspect will be downplayed that this was actually from a state of innocence and the unknown and they believed this was the right thing to do at the time, that it's just unfortunate. It's doubtful we will even get their before the next major crisis to overshadow these worries and keep us sedated with fear...

[Gurualvin]

On 11/23/2022 at 9:43 AM, bamboozooka said:

 

just look at the sheepy comments on campbells videos. its vomitsville.

 

gbnews is controlled similar to russell brand. they can get away with saying so much, but theres a line they must'nt cross

 

gbnews might look like they are waking up normies but i can guarantee if a jabbed sheepie is watching steyn and he goes on

one about vax injuries they will turn off immediately as they can't handle hearing what they volunteered for is harmful 

 

ive got relatives ill caused by the jabs believing their illness is not caused by the jabs. im not sure whether it down to programming

or cognitive dissonance

The sheeple are programmed, to go into cognitive dissonance.

[Captainlove]

A little bit of me died inside tonight. My wife went out to her dance class with a bunch of covid morons, who think that matt Wankcock should win the game show and be left alone as he's said sorry. Also they still 100% believe covid is still dangerous and keep testing themselves. If this is a representation of the the uk population then i feel we really are fucked!!! My wife really had to bit her tongue and not say what she really thought.

[- TZC -]

I like Neil Oliver he knows, but he's been edging for months trying to find a way to say more without saying more. . He was interested in finding stuff in the floor originally, but woke the fuck up to what's going on afterwards and it took him over - no surprise there. If I was on tv I'd probably be doing the same as he is. You can't go all David Icke turquoise to the bleaters and expect to last a second third or fourth time embellishing on your opinion that's been established.

 

Wait a minute.. This thread is supposed to be about the stray dog in a park blower.. Why am I saying any of this?

 

Because you bastards set it off track already that's why. Sorry but it's your fault.

 

 

 

[novymir]

4 hours ago, Captainlove said:

A little bit of me died inside tonight. My wife went out to her dance class with a bunch of covid morons, who think that matt Wankcock should win the game show and be left alone as he's said sorry. Also they still 100% believe covid is still dangerous and keep testing themselves. If this is a representation of the the uk population then i feel we really are fucked!!! My wife really had to bit her tongue and not say what she really thought.

Well, be glad you've got a partner with a clue.

 

The absudity of this world precludes it from being classified as "reality".

 

[Youknownothingbutyou]

On 11/20/2022 at 12:30 AM, Malbec said:

He heavily promoted the vaccine on TV in 2020 (paid?) Pushing the well known objective of "getting normality back" And also does all those anti establishment monologues (where he uses a lot of eloquent words to say very little) whilst praising the queen.  It's hard to like or praise someone who's done a convenient u-turn after convincing people to get it, who are probably now irreversibly damaged. Same as fake Dr John Campbell, who incidentally in the YouTube comments some people actually say "my husband got it because of you" etc.... 

 

So its one thing being pro vaccine in an office or whatever, but publicly pushing it to a following is something quite different isn't it.  Blood on their hands 

wait, neil oliver promoted the vaccine?

if he did, he clearly saw the light. people can change. Same with Campbell.

 

for me, it sure aint hard to praise the insightful monologues of Oliver and all the recent youtube video from Dr Campbell where he spits data after data directly going against everything the pharmaceutical is trying to do.

Edited November 25, 2022 by Youknownothingbutyou

[Youknownothingbutyou]

5 hours ago, Captainlove said:

A little bit of me died inside tonight. My wife went out to her dance class with a bunch of covid morons, who think that matt Wankcock should win the game show and be left alone as he's said sorry. Also they still 100% believe covid is still dangerous and keep testing themselves. If this is a representation of the the uk population then i feel we really are fucked!!! My wife really had to bit her tongue and not say what she really thought.

you guys should have said what you think

 

its a fact that covid aint more dangerous then the flu

therefore, people got scared for a disease less dangerous then the flu. 

its a fact that lockdown didnt protect anyone

fact that hancock ordered midazolam and there have been a increase of its usage by tenfold in pandemic era

 

Sheep must be told the facts, i dont care about their feelings. if they say things that arent real, im saying it. respectfully, but i wont keep my mouth shut any longer.

[DannyUK]

As previously stated, a pure PR exercise to normalise what has been carried out through Matt Hancock which just shows absolute utter contempt for anyone with a brain, especially when we are being preached to being told what “everyone believes” now, we then have entered into the public psyche “the new Matt Hancock” - public image. All an absolute crock of shit complete PR stunt from start to finish.

 

Notice a take on any form of symbolism here?

 

 

Matt Hancock is actually, undeniably, a genius

It turns out everyone — and I include myself in this — was totally wrong about the scandal-tainted public servant

 

Matt Hancock

As they say, a week is a long time in politics. But in reality TV, it’s a series of wildly varying lifetimes.
Remember when, only ten days ago, Matt Hancock arrived on I’m a Celebrity . . .

Get Me Out of Here!to almost universal opprobrium, and borderline riot?

“Lord Corona  Crowned King?”

“If he wins, I’m handing in my crown,” said former King of the Jungle Christopher Biggins.

“What a vile personality. What an appalling adulterous creep,” Miriam Margolyes thundered on The Six O’Clock Show. “I think he’s a detestable, vile, puny individual. Why we’re having him on our TVs, I don’t know.”

 

When the prime minister was put on the spot about Hancock while at Cop27, Sunak said, pointedly: “I think politics at its best can, and should be, actually quite noble” — the silent kicker of, “And shouldn’t involve eating camel anus for four hundred large” hanging in the air, next to him.

 

Over the next few days, things only got worse: the campaigning group Covid-19 Bereaved Families For Justice hired a plane and flew it over the campsite trailing a banner that read “Covid bereaved say get out of here!” The Conservative Party removed the whip from Hancock, his constituents were up in arms, Ofcom received more than 1,000 complaints in 24 hours, and there were dark whispers that, maybe, ITV1 had made a terrible mistake, and irreparably tainted one of their biggest franchises.

 

I’m a Celeb is basically Battersea Dogs and Cats Home for tired B-listers — allowing them to be rehomed into a loving new fan demographic in time for Christmas. It’s not a “fun turn” for scandal-tainted public servants.

Well, here we are in mid-November and what do you know?
It turns out everyone — and I include myself in this — was totally wrong.
Hancock is actually, provably, a genius. Even if you put PT Barnum, Simon Cowell and Saatchi & Saatchi in a blender — possibly as part of a Bushtucker Trial, if the anus supply runs low — your pint of PR nous still wouldn’t hold a candle to what has been revealed as Hancock’s unlikely, but undeniable, stone-cold genius.

“Matt Hancock survives public vote!” “I’m a Celebrity viewers are warming to Matt Hancock!” “Christopher Biggins says he thinks Matt Hancock will make it to the final three!” “It’s Matt Hancock’s show, says Nadine Dorries!” “ ‘Sad’ Matt Hancock montages hit on TikTok!” “Matt Hancock dance memes go viral!”

Yes — tapping into a deep wisdom, for the first five days, Hancock wisely opted for a stoic, can-do vibe when the public voted for him to undergo every disgusting challenge — presumably having calculated that the British have an unstoppable “underdog sympathy reflex”.
Surly this proves the exact opposite, they don’t have anything of the sort of an underdog sympathy reflex.
It’s called having your head so deeply programmed it’s up your own arse!

Sure enough, this kicked in on day six.

Since then, Hancock has not been voted for a single Bushtucker Trial.
Instead — with an inevitability that seems so obvious now — his “journey” on the show has seen him go from “masochistic public punishment” to “I know I made a mistake” to “I’m just looking for forgiveness” to “dazzling * reinvention * as a gonkish public schoolboy, just tryin’ to get through this crazy trip called life”.

“I’m a Celeb fans in dramatic U-turn — saying they now want Hancock to win,” the Sun reported on Tuesday, after a readers’ poll had put him ahead, on about 25 per cent of the vote. And there it is: even if Hancock doesn’t eventually end up as King of the Jungle, his seemingly suicidal mission has ended in triumph.

 

Two black female TV presenters and Boy George were voted off before the Lockdown Adulterer, and the member of parliament for West Suffolk seems to have got some of the “forgiveness” he was willing to eat anus to achieve.
I’ll say it again — obviously still dizzy with disbelief: Matt Hancock is a genius.

https://apple.news/Azs720wo-QCiuEZK-uTTa7g

Edited November 25, 2022 by DannyUK

[Malbec]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/celebrity/article-11467355/Im-Celebrity-2022-Chris-Moyles-SIXTH-star-voted-out.html

 

You know where this is going.... the sad thing is, the public think the worst thing "matt" did was snog his secretary while everyone was locked down and now he's said sorry so it's fine

[Captainlove]

6 hours ago, Youknownothingbutyou said:

you guys should have said what you think

 

its a fact that covid aint more dangerous then the flu

therefore, people got scared for a disease less dangerous then the flu. 

its a fact that lockdown didnt protect anyone

fact that hancock ordered midazolam and there have been a increase of its usage by tenfold in pandemic era

 

Sheep must be told the facts, i dont care about their feelings. if they say things that arent real, im saying it. respectfully, but i wont keep my mouth shut any longer.

If  i was there i would of no doubt said something but my wife is fairly quiet person who doesn't like any kind of confrontation.

[Captainlove]

4 hours ago, Malbec said:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/celebrity/article-11467355/Im-Celebrity-2022-Chris-Moyles-SIXTH-star-voted-out.html

 

You know where this is going.... the sad thing is, the public think the worst thing "matt" did was snog his secretary while everyone was locked down and now he's said sorry so it's fine

Even Chris moyles said he was shocked that the puplic like hancock more than him.

[Captainlove]

5 hours ago, DannyUK said:

As previously stated, a pure PR exercise to normalise what has been carried out through Matt Hancock which just shows absolute utter contempt for anyone with a brain, especially when we are being preached to being told what “everyone believes” now, we then have entered into the public psyche “the new Matt Hancock” - public image. All an absolute crock of shit complete PR stunt from start to finish.

 

Notice a take on any form of symbolism here?

 

 

Matt Hancock is actually, undeniably, a genius

It turns out everyone — and I include myself in this — was totally wrong about the scandal-tainted public servant

 

Matt Hancock

As they say, a week is a long time in politics. But in reality TV, it’s a series of wildly varying lifetimes.
Remember when, only ten days ago, Matt Hancock arrived on I’m a Celebrity . . .

Get Me Out of Here!to almost universal opprobrium, and borderline riot?

“Lord Corona  Crowned King?”

“If he wins, I’m handing in my crown,” said former King of the Jungle Christopher Biggins.

“What a vile personality. What an appalling adulterous creep,” Miriam Margolyes thundered on The Six O’Clock Show. “I think he’s a detestable, vile, puny individual. Why we’re having him on our TVs, I don’t know.”

 

When the prime minister was put on the spot about Hancock while at Cop27, Sunak said, pointedly: “I think politics at its best can, and should be, actually quite noble” — the silent kicker of, “And shouldn’t involve eating camel anus for four hundred large” hanging in the air, next to him.

 

Over the next few days, things only got worse: the campaigning group Covid-19 Bereaved Families For Justice hired a plane and flew it over the campsite trailing a banner that read “Covid bereaved say get out of here!” The Conservative Party removed the whip from Hancock, his constituents were up in arms, Ofcom received more than 1,000 complaints in 24 hours, and there were dark whispers that, maybe, ITV1 had made a terrible mistake, and irreparably tainted one of their biggest franchises.

 

I’m a Celeb is basically Battersea Dogs and Cats Home for tired B-listers — allowing them to be rehomed into a loving new fan demographic in time for Christmas. It’s not a “fun turn” for scandal-tainted public servants.

Well, here we are in mid-November and what do you know?
It turns out everyone — and I include myself in this — was totally wrong.
Hancock is actually, provably, a genius. Even if you put PT Barnum, Simon Cowell and Saatchi & Saatchi in a blender — possibly as part of a Bushtucker Trial, if the anus supply runs low — your pint of PR nous still wouldn’t hold a candle to what has been revealed as Hancock’s unlikely, but undeniable, stone-cold genius.

“Matt Hancock survives public vote!” “I’m a Celebrity viewers are warming to Matt Hancock!” “Christopher Biggins says he thinks Matt Hancock will make it to the final three!” “It’s Matt Hancock’s show, says Nadine Dorries!” “ ‘Sad’ Matt Hancock montages hit on TikTok!” “Matt Hancock dance memes go viral!”

Yes — tapping into a deep wisdom, for the first five days, Hancock wisely opted for a stoic, can-do vibe when the public voted for him to undergo every disgusting challenge — presumably having calculated that the British have an unstoppable “underdog sympathy reflex”.
Surly this proves the exact opposite, they don’t have anything of the sort of an underdog sympathy reflex.
It’s called having your head so deeply programmed it’s up your own arse!

Sure enough, this kicked in on day six.

Since then, Hancock has not been voted for a single Bushtucker Trial.
Instead — with an inevitability that seems so obvious now — his “journey” on the show has seen him go from “masochistic public punishment” to “I know I made a mistake” to “I’m just looking for forgiveness” to “dazzling * reinvention * as a gonkish public schoolboy, just tryin’ to get through this crazy trip called life”.

“I’m a Celeb fans in dramatic U-turn — saying they now want Hancock to win,” the Sun reported on Tuesday, after a readers’ poll had put him ahead, on about 25 per cent of the vote. And there it is: even if Hancock doesn’t eventually end up as King of the Jungle, his seemingly suicidal mission has ended in triumph.

 

Two black female TV presenters and Boy George were voted off before the Lockdown Adulterer, and the member of parliament for West Suffolk seems to have got some of the “forgiveness” he was willing to eat anus to achieve.
I’ll say it again — obviously still dizzy with disbelief: Matt Hancock is a genius.

https://apple.news/Azs720wo-QCiuEZK-uTTa7g

I’m a Celeb is basically Battersea Dogs and Cats Home for tired B-listers — allowing them to be rehomed into a loving new fan demographic in time for Christmas. It’s not a “fun turn” for scandal-tainted public servants.  Fantastic bit of writing Danny.

[Useyournous]

All these posts are brilliant! Thanks.

[DannyUK]

On 11/25/2022 at 10:17 AM, Captainlove said:

I’m a Celeb is basically Battersea Dogs and Cats Home for tired B-listers — allowing them to be rehomed into a loving new fan demographic in time for Christmas. It’s not a “fun turn” for scandal-tainted public servants.  Fantastic bit of writing Danny.

I’m sorry to say - or for any confusion as I did add a few comments of my own into it in the end - that was actually written by CaItlin Moran I believe and that was actually the only part I agreed on…

 

The rest about Matt Hancock being an underdog and unfairly prejudged by society is absolute claptrap to spin Matt Hancocks image is what I was getting at or trying to point out by sharing it and trying to highlight what I see as key areas to spin the psychological phantom, which is exactly why Hancock’s in there in the first place and we have certain sentiments shared that many people will buy into usual through the use of humour - and is how historically stereotypes have been used so later down the line we can all be made guilty for holding such stereotypes btw - and then the new perception of Matt Hancock can be entered.
I can only see this as deliberately trying to piss off all those off who can actually see this and what’s taking place here. 

The argument is then being controlled around what was carried out through COVID as Hancock’s personal life and the likes of PPE that was used that was mis-sold or wasn't satisfactory in protecting against COVID rather than COVID was a scam, has never been shown/proven to exist, there’s more proof to show that it was a fabricated lie and political tool to impose the will of globalist government and agendas that was systematic and premeditated.
All in all to impose Gene Therapy DNA damaging medical procedures as if they were “vaccinations” that aren’t really vaccines at all but by mis-selling vaccines, that has very obviously been shown to seriously injure and kill off a lot of people and to destroy the previous social structures without hope of return is very obviously the foreshadowed and premeditated plan they actually brag about and when we repeat it, we are all called conspiracy nuts, so the new technocracy can be imposed out of the ashes, “6uild 6ack 6etter”.
We’re supposed to desire this revolutionary state so their surveillance state can be brought in and us imbeciles both build and comply with it. Whilst focus upon Matt Hancock is seeking to reframe events such as these or piss off a certain amount of people who can actually see this. Hancock was the figurehead used to promote and psychologically frame the COVID narrative so he is being used as the figurehead to psychologically reframe the narrative and control debate now and we have this type of contempt with the use of the jungle games show bollocks to help drive the narrative. It’s about more than Handcock.

It’s psychologically reframing the narrative and reshaping context surrounding the whole issue, mostly by building straw men to tear down, rather than obvious clear and open debate surrounding what has actually taken place via COVID and continues to take place whilst the same people still imposing this are suggesting “Let’s Declare a Pandemic Amnesty”.
You can’t declare an amnesty if you’re still carrying out the thing you’re declaring an amnesty against…

Its saying, society take a step back from debating issues surrounding the pandemic whilst we continue to impose it without your resistance to it, so we can play your resistance and rage off against yourself so you’ll actually build the society we’re actually trying to create by psychologically playing you like musical instruments…

But of course, if this takes place many people will believe they’re fighting against the same system of control who are responsible for this state of affairs.

 

Control Reframe/Reshaping Context…

The mentality behind the imposition

 

Edited November 29, 2022 by DannyUK