numnuts Posted October 31, 2022 Share Posted October 31, 2022 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-63412651 'The UK terror survivors tracked down by ‘disaster trolls’.' 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickwan Posted October 31, 2022 Share Posted October 31, 2022 It would be hilarious if it wasn't so criminally disgusting. Both the "terror survivors" and the BBC are accomplices in a crime. The latter is using the former as a flimsy pretext to attack Richard Hall, whose only crime is shining the light of truth on their sordid deception. They can't go toe-to-toe with him on facts, as they'd lose before they began, so have resorted to an emotive and personal attack on Richard. The bonkers witch admits she hasn't even read his Manchester book. Apologies if double posting, but here's Richard's written response: https://www.richplanet.net/panorama.php And associated video: https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=301&part=1&gen=99 Also, maybe of interest, here's Andrew Johnson's short summary of the situation: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted October 31, 2022 Share Posted October 31, 2022 I presume the BBC didn't do any of the things Richard explicitly asked them not to, otherwise he would take legal action against them. (I'm not wasting my time watching crap from Ms Spring-from-nowhere.) Typical BBC behaviour in those emails. Disgusting organisation. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
factJack Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 It was similar to the tactic SKy news took towards the McCann (won't use their T word) dissenter? Betty Leyland, when they turned up at her house. I expect Hall knew it was coming and was ready as he totally owned the situation. I've watched Panorama last night and many richplanet videos in the past, I was quite surprised to see Neil Sanders turn against Hall. He was a guest on his show many times. Maybe he's trying for a job in the mainstream? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 20 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said: I presume the BBC didn't do any of the things Richard explicitly asked them not to, otherwise he would take legal action against them. (I'm not wasting my time watching crap from Ms Spring-from-nowhere.) Typical BBC behaviour in those emails. Disgusting organisation. Richard politely replied to Ms Spring's emails that he did not wish to speak to her, and asked her not to contact him again. She of course then continued to pester him, and the final straw was when she turned up at his market stall in Merthyr Tydfil with a film crew. He of course then refused to engage with her, as he knew she was there just looking for a "gotcha moment". She's a fucking hypocrite, accusing him of turning up at peoples' homes, while doing the same herself. She is just another 'narrative enforcer'. 9 hours ago, factJack said: I've watched Panorama last night and many richplanet videos in the past, I was quite surprised to see Neil Sanders turn against Hall. He was a guest on his show many times. Maybe he's trying for a job in the mainstream? I commented in another thread here about this, yes I did find it a bit odd that Neil Sanders chose to speak to the BBC to give his opinion on Richard Hall. He is of course entitled to his opinion, which is fine, but being a supposed 'expert' in all things related to social engineering, media propaganda and psychological manipulation (as has ben evident on his numerous appearances on the RichPlanet show), he must have known that what he told the BBC would be used in this manner? Andrew Johnson (another long-time RichPlanet contributor and guest) was also contacted by the BBC, but he knew what was coming and refused to engage with them as well. I haven't watched this Panorama documentary myself, and to be honest I'm probably not likely to. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sock muppet Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 What sickens me the most about Ms Spring in this latest from Rich is that awful fake yearning face of concern almost a begging face that reminded me of some stooges talking at TED talks using terminology to market the idea that paedophilia is a just a misunderstood 'minor attraction sexual preference', grrrr, she's another one i could lovingly show the error of her ways!!! But as always Richard delivers the most factual show of any journalist/investigator i have ever watched, always thought prevoking stuff regardless of topics and delivered in a very engaging way, such a shame when he got removed from the TerrorVision channels where i first encountered his work, but in hindsight probably the best thing to have happened as he would have given the idiot box some credibility. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 (edited) I would really like Marianna to investigate 100s of FOI replies from around the world stating that they don't hold the Covid-19 virus info. Even the UK Cabinet office said it has no information. How can that be? Edited November 1, 2022 by DaleP 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted November 2, 2022 Share Posted November 2, 2022 22 hours ago, sock muppet said: What sickens me the most about Ms Spring in this latest from Rich is that awful fake yearning face of concern almost a begging face that reminded me of some stooges talking at TED talks using terminology to market the idea that paedophilia is a just a misunderstood 'minor attraction sexual preference', grrrr, she's another one i could lovingly show the error of her ways!!! Ms Spring is a product of the 'journalist education system', she will have been 'trained' via some university degree programme in "how to be a journalist". Either directly or indirectly, she is involved with Common Purpose. 22 hours ago, DaleP said: I would really like Marianna to investigate 100s of FOI replies from around the world stating that they don't hold the Covid-19 virus info. If she is a supposed "specialist misinformation reporter", she should probably have started by investigating her colleagues at the BBC. But of course that would never happen, as the BBC is supposedly a 'trusted news source'. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masonfreeparty2 Posted November 2, 2022 Share Posted November 2, 2022 (edited) watched ben emlyn jones podcast on it but i was surprised he got the name of the maker of 7/7 ripple effect completely wrong..watch 1 hr 22mins in...i mean john anthony west ffs! when everyone knows it was john hill...he says it was a genuine mistake but i doubt it myself ..Spring is another corrupted product of oxford Edited November 2, 2022 by masonfreeparty2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masonfreeparty2 Posted November 3, 2022 Share Posted November 3, 2022 what d'ya reckon to this photo of her? is she fishing for insults? i heard ben emlyn jones call her an intellectual prostitute..by design? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickwan Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 19 hours ago, masonfreeparty2 said: what d'ya reckon to this photo of her? is she fishing for insults? i heard ben emlyn jones call her an intellectual prostitute..by design? If I may descend to the level of the playground for a moment, and offer up some insults.... Well, she does have quite a solid meaty face. Rather manly, in my opinion. Is 'she' one of those transvestites we've been hearing so much about lately? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 That's a woman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masonfreeparty2 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 abit of good news re freedom of speech..that will piss off jeremy Vine and marianna spring https://www.sott.net/.../473914-Government-to-scrap-legal... That's great news. The Free Speech Union has been campaigning against the 'legal but harmful' clause in the Bill ever since it was published. (See this piece by me in Conservative Home, for instance.) Of course, the Bill has many other shortcomings, but this change alone will be a huge improvement. Well done to all those FSU members and supporters who took advantage of our campaigning tool to email their MP to ask them to highlight the problems with the Bill, particularly the 'legal but harmful' clause. Let's hope Michelle Donelan goes further and transforms it into a piece of legislation focused on protecting children from online harm, not adults. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sock muppet Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 3 hours ago, Dickwan said: Is 'she' one of those transvestites we've been hearing so much about lately? That's difficult to say without being near them in real life, increasingly i am studying these media whores for an Adams apple, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sock muppet Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 23 hours ago, masonfreeparty2 said: what d'ya reckon to this photo of her? is she fishing for insults? i heard ben emlyn jones call her an intellectual prostitute..by design? Further developments in connection with these two, now i am betting that there is a masonic angle to all of this from the council, which will probably cite some such nonsense as keeping the peace or just generalised shit stirring of minor details to the clause in the stated purpose of the shopping center, when i first read what Richard was doing with his new book/merchandise store i thought it would be too controversial for the hitler crowd that run these mini dictatorships, but anyway there is going to be another rabbit hole to go down when the council present the reason's, i'm sure Richard is salivating at the opportunity for more quality investigative research, look forward to the new episode to come on this one Richard, 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masonfreeparty2 Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 38 minutes ago, sock muppet said: Further developments in connection with these two, now i am betting that there is a masonic angle to all of this from the council, which will probably cite some such nonsense as keeping the peace or just generalised shit stirring of minor details to the clause in the stated purpose of the shopping center, when i first read what Richard was doing with his new book/merchandise store i thought it would be too controversial for the hitler crowd that run these mini dictatorships, but anyway there is going to be another rabbit hole to go down when the council present the reason's, i'm sure Richard is salivating at the opportunity for more quality investigative research, look forward to the new episode to come on this one Richard, why doesnt richard get someone else to open his stall without the manchester bombing dvds and books? cant see what the council can complain about then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sock muppet Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 14 minutes ago, masonfreeparty2 said: why doesnt richard get someone else to open his stall without the manchester bombing dvds and books? cant see what the council can complain about then My guess is that vile n sprog are in conversation with the council with a nod and a wink if ya knowadimean, but if it was me instead of Richard i would have weighed up the realistic challenges that might have been provoked in doing so, and i would have anticipated the councils move on this, and i would be smiling to myself at just how clever i was at reverse psychology, dontchakno, and i would be on the case right now about that, but that's just me, so if your reading this Richard i will be looking forward for the new show on welsh council corruption, 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 2 hours ago, sock muppet said: My guess is that vile n sprog are in conversation with the council with a nod and a wink if ya knowadimean, but if it was me instead of Richard i would have weighed up the realistic challenges that might have been provoked in doing so, and i would have anticipated the councils move on this, and i would be smiling to myself at just how clever i was at reverse psychology, dontchakno, and i would be on the case right now about that, but that's just me, so if your reading this Richard i will be looking forward for the new show on welsh council corruption, As I have already mentioned, it was surely no 'coincidence' that after Richard Hall refused to engage with Ms Spring and her camera crew, a few days later YouTube closed his account and channel. That's the kind of 'power' that the BBC has, that it can lean on YouTube, and even councils, to bend to their wishes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sock muppet Posted November 4, 2022 Share Posted November 4, 2022 19 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said: As I have already mentioned, it was surely no 'coincidence' that after Richard Hall refused to engage with Ms Spring and her camera crew, a few days later YouTube closed his account and channel. That's the kind of 'power' that the BBC has, that it can lean on YouTube, and even councils, to bend to their wishes. How much of bill hates do we need to thank for turning the nations one and only broadcaster supposedly owned by Britannia and her peoples and purveyor of facts without political colour, into the mind kontrol apparatus that Orwell warned us about, a lot i would say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malbec Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65136825 Just trying to find the Richard D Hall thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted August 7 Share Posted August 7 Ooh our favourite pin-up was pushing her crap on BBC Breakfast TV this am. Did anyone see this piece of classic comedy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted August 13 Share Posted August 13 On 4/3/2023 at 5:45 AM, Malbec said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65136825 Just trying to find the Richard D Hall thread. Here: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack121 Posted August 15 Share Posted August 15 On 11/1/2022 at 9:38 PM, DaleP said: I would really like Marianna to investigate 100s of FOI replies from around the world stating that they don't hold the Covid-19 virus info. Even the UK Cabinet office said it has no information. How can that be? Or she could investigate the many paedophile allegations against the royals, politicians, celebs - but then she may get bumped off like jill dando - wouldn't that be a shame Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sock muppet Posted August 15 Share Posted August 15 3 hours ago, jack121 said: Or she could investigate the many paedophile allegations against the royals, politicians, celebs - but then she may get bumped off like jill dando - wouldn't that be a shame Yes, and could start by interviewing 'phil me up with skovid schofield' and 'holly not a dolly' of morning tv fame and ask about the names that were listed on the piece of paper he handed to 'dave the tax dodging clown camer-moron ex prime monster of parliament' live and direct to the great British gawping public that nobody said a word about because at that time in the morning the lights are on but nobodies home, that would be an excellent place to start going down the supposed rabbit hole of truth seeking, instead of producing images of the twat looking into the toilet bowl of life, which is a more appropriate way to describe what we see in real life, Look i found the toilet, isnt s/he whatever special, 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted August 16 Share Posted August 16 Conspiracyland? Good grief. Is that really the best they can do. Has anyone ever described anything as "Conspiracyland"? Dearie me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.