Jump to content

Row over coronation oil


Mikhail Liebestein

Recommended Posts

Apparently the vegan lobby is getting angry over the oil to be used in the coronation as it contains material of animal origin, including:

 

-whale vomit (ambergris)

- Civet cat gland extract

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11309229/Coronation-oils-traditional-recipe-cruel-cats-suffer-traumatic-painful-process.html

 

https://keralakaumudi.com/en/news/mobile/news.php?id=900110

 


Personally, I'd have thought Adrenochrome was more of an issue!!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know ambergris is a coveted ingredient in expensive perfumes (or used to be?) but had not heard of civet cat gland before, so looked it up.

 

Odor profile: Naturally the byproduct of the anal glands of exotic civet cats (technically no cats), which smells very pungent and fecal but which gives an amazing radiance and warmth to florals. Now synthetically replicated with civetone for ethical reasons.

 

How odd that someone would contemplate a pungent, FECAL smelling product to add it to floral fragrances in the first place.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Campion said:

But he has to be anointed with the holy Chrism oil so he can become a Christ, an anointed one.  Come to think of it, those of who were confirmed in the C of E  were also anointed with the holy oil so maybe there's more "Christs" around than we think !

 

Myrrh is malodorous to me too  (and frankinsense for that matter) - I wonder why it was / is so prized. Just had a very quick scan & it does appear to have some medicinal properties. 

 

A bit of Lynx spray would suit that deadbeat better than all this fancy stuff.

 

Yuck! I've just looked at the civet cat muck (or musk) https://www.qt-store.com/100-grams-of-civets-cat-musk-gland-from-ethiopian/

I wonder if the extraction of that is just like when your dog does bum scoots becuase it's anal glands have got clogged up and need expressing by hand.

Edited by Tinfoil Hat
  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

Apparently the vegan lobby is getting angry over the oil to be used in the coronation as it contains material of animal origin, including:

 

-whale vomit (ambergris)

- Civet cat gland extract

 

 

The Amergris is a concern because many species of Whale are endangered. This doesn't matter to the Addams family though, since they are fucking freaky Satanists who like to kill and eat anything that breathes. Also likely to appear behind the scenes during the Coronation: the blood of a million children. 

 

Rest assured Chaz and the rest of the Addams family will slaughter the poor Whales themselves, they're good that way. And what the poor fucking Civet cats have done to deserve meeting a grisly end at the hands of these Reptilian fucks I'll never know.

 

Fuck these inbred Kooks

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Campion said:

But he has to be anointed with the holy Chrism oil so he can become a Christ, an anointed one.  Come to think of it, those of who were confirmed in the C of E  were also anointed with the holy oil so maybe there's more "Christs" around than we think !

The oil of kings is CBD it's called David's oil. The queen was NOT annointed with it so was technically a false monarch. Charles is also a false monarch if he's about to be annointed with triffid oil .

 Edward oofr David was a eunuch barren as was Mrs Simpson.

 

They could not annoint a barren king Infront of millions with Davis pil be ause of asabove so below duality.

 

That's why elizabethbecame queen because of the barren Jewish German line. At David.

 

Her annointing was very new with now real quirky oils at all. It's why they nev r showed it on tv.

 

If she was under influence of CBD it would show in her face at the coronation.

And confirm she was ultimately controlled.

 

Give her CBD and she could summon down the snake against her enemies the state.

 

 

Cnbd is known to cause impotence but also awaken the snake Kundalini.

So if they are unannointed they walk outside of the Kundalini n snake energyand no power.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

 

Why, in what context have you heard of civet cats recently @sock muppet? Such repetitions of occurance can be of significance.

 

It was mentioned at the start of convid by MSM as a likely cause of the non existent virus, so i am puzzled about it's re emergence and now in connection with the coronation, that i do not see happening.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2022 at 2:37 AM, RidgyDidgy said:

makes them sound very pagan

 

I think they are, this belief in a 'Royal Family' a special lineage with 'Divine' links is rooted in Paganism.

 

The 'Divine Seed' or special lineage and being annointed goes back to the Old Testament and the OT is rooted in Paganism.

 

Although the Bible doesn't authorise Kingship it accepts it as established that there are personages designated by God as special and hence designated rulers.

 

It validates Kingship.

 

This is superstitous Pagan horseshit rooted in Fertility worship.

 

Belief or acceptance in a 'Royal Family' is putting oneself under the pagan spell. Yet even the athiests do it willingly, as well as the Christians.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, pi3141 said:

I think they are, this belief in a 'Royal Family' a special lineage with 'Divine' links is rooted in Paganism.

 

The 'Divine Seed' or special lineage and being annointed goes back to the Old Testament and the OT is rooted in Paganism.

 

Although the Bible doesn't authorise Kingship it accepts it as established that there are personages designated by God as special and hence designated rulers.

 

It validates Kingship.

 

This is superstitous Pagan horseshit rooted in Fertility worship.

 

Belief or acceptance in a 'Royal Family' is putting oneself under the pagan spell. Yet even the athiests do it willingly, as well as the Christians.

 

Pi, do you know about ancient pagan religions? I'm thinking that if the King/Pharaoh/Chieftain was also the head priest of the religion, then of course they've got a conflict of interest about keeping themselves and their family in power.  It comes back to promoting one's own family ahead of others, as does the whole aristocracy. Even if the King wasn't the head priest, they would have had the priests under their thumbs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

The British monarch claims to be defender of the faith - taken to be Christianity, but so much of what is practiced in the name of Christianity is Pagan, such is the breadth & depth of deceit.

 

Yeah it was originally the Roman Catholic faith, the Pope gave the title to Henry VIII ironically enough. And I agree there's a lot of Paganism in it.  Why not, all religions are developments of Paganism anyway. 

 

1 hour ago, bamboozooka said:

they will have to use rapeseed oil.

after all they've put that nasty stuff in everything else

 

At least we actually grow rapeseed in this country so imo it's better than something else like palm oil. It's all symbolic so it's all about what mythology and rituals they are enacting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Campion said:

Pi, do you know about ancient pagan religions? I'm thinking that if the King/Pharaoh/Chieftain was also the head priest of the religion, then of course they've got a conflict of interest about keeping themselves and their family in power.  It comes back to promoting one's own family ahead of others, as does the whole aristocracy. Even if the King wasn't the head priest, they would have had the priests under their thumbs.  

 

I'm afraid I can't say for certain, however the Egyptians had the ruler as head of state and head of church. Now we have 'separation of church and state' famously. And yes, the Egyptian rulers had the Priesthood under their control.

 

If we look back, I think we see this duopoly of Priestcraft and Kingship has long been in existence.

 

I'm simplifying, but looking back leaders were 'probably' often chosen by the philosophy 'Might is right' and hence the strongest, fittest and best hunter became leader. Again, only my imagination, but presumably at some point it was realized that 'wise' rulers were better than brute rulers. Alongside this thrust for power and leadership in the human psyche - based on either brute force or higher intelligence was challenged by the Shaman sect who appeared to have access to higher knowledge and themselves be full of wisdom.

 

So probably an alliance formed between those seeking power with temporal means and those who could gain power with spiritual knowledge. Hence religions seem to accept the idea of Kingship and have positioned themselves to be an authority with it and in this way power was taken from the 'Warrior-Chief' to these others.

Its a confidence game.

 

It becomes so complicated that you and I as layman can not understand and are bamboozled by the charade but those in power - the Kings nd Priestcraft - they understand it, they have traditions and history and sacred writings to prove their argument and of course as mainly illiterates we plebs knew no better that what they told us so had to go along with the charade.

 

The simple truth is we are all equal and we all have connections to God. So we don't need a ruling class and we don't need a priesthood and church. But they argue differently, they argue they are born higher or with spiritual connections that means they have authority over us.

 

Look at the Royal Family, live in Palaces, waited on, eat the best food, huge wealth. Then look at the Pope, lives in Palaces and Mansions, waited on, eats the best food, huge wealth. Whats the difference?

 

One has power and privilege by professing 'special lineage' and the other has power and privilege by professing 'special connection' both act in unison, the King seeks the permission of the church and the church accepts the Kings authority and privilege.

 

The Church validates the King and the King validates the Church.

 

Its just a con game, which extends all the way back to our Pagan, primitive roots.

 

Here's an article from a Reverend explaining the Queens feelings - now you see why the Queen was 'a staunch defender of the faith' because its peoples faith in the Church that enables or validates her privilege and position and for precisely the same reason the Church supports the Royal Family because the Royal Family validates their power. It all goes back to our Pagan roots and tribal mentality.

 

 

RIP The Queen 1926-2022. Her divine right to rule - Reverend Peter Mullen

On the sad occasion of her death, Reverend Peter Mullen salutes the sacred monarch and her Coronation, rooted in the Old Testament

 

‘In the morning upon the day of the Coronation early, care is to be taken that the Ampulla be filled with Oil for the anointing, and, together with the Spoon, be laid ready upon the Altar in the Abbey Church.’

 

This is about sacral kingship. The Coronation rite refers back to the anointing of kings in the Old Testament, to Samuel, Saul and David; and to when Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet anointed Solomon King.

 

Fittingly, Handel’s marvellous anthem by that name was sung at the Coronation in the Abbey. This was a holy event. That’s why the Queen never abdicated – she saw her work as a religious duty.

 

As the Archbishop said, ‘Bless and sanctify thy chosen servant Elizabeth... Receive the Ring of kingly dignity and the seal of Catholic Faith.’

 

The historic English settlement means the Queen was Supreme Governor of both Church and State. She was obliged to declare herself a Christian monarch and to promise to defend the Church of England. This is why the suggestion that the next monarch should be described as ‘Defender of Faiths’ is mere moonshine and a sort of clowning. The monarch, in her person, stands for the reality of truth.

 

And this truth is a particular truth - the truth of the Christian creeds.

 

Link - https://www.theoldie.co.uk/blog/the-queens-divine-right-to-rule-reverend-peter-mullen

 

 

Pagan superstitious horseshit. Its a con game like most of Paganism.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...