Investigator who revealed Jimmy Savile on new case, but suspect untouchable

[CarpeDiem]

As soon as I read this article I smelt the usual BS. This guy, the ‘tv private investigator’ is like a tv doctor…..full of shite and just a script reader. 
So to get this ‘detective’ Mark Williams-Thomas into the public arena, he is acclaimed with exposing Jimmy ‘the scum’ Saville, then appears on tv ‘investigating’ things like the Mcann girl that went missing….I watched that and thought this bloke (Mark Williams-Thomas) is a joke and is being used to divert truth via the media. But back to my point……he exposed JS? My question would be…..why the hell didn’t any other copper or detective expose JS way back in the 70’s when it was obvious what the devious little scum bag was up to? Or even in the 80’s or even the 90’s or even the early 2000’s when the little shite was still alive? Why is some tosser credited with exposing JS well into the 2000’s?
Yep these sick tossers are still out there and will continue their evil, sick deeds for as long as we allow it. As far as this joker of an investigator goes…that’s about it, he, in my opinion is a joke. A tv detective, just like a tv doctor.

[sock muppet]

18 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

So, the floodgates opened after Savile was publicly (and posthumously) outed.

 

Did they?

 

A lot of talk, but what exactly changed. We've had a decade now of continued child-trafficking, noncing around and suspects/victims being suicided or bought off.

 

 

Throw this lot into the mix and the problem just seems to grow, greater exposure is the only way, you may think that this lot don't care about that but clearly they do, who is it they think they appeal to, not many, but i bet they occupy lofty positions and therefore why they hide identity.

 

Satanic Temple Sues Indiana Over Abortion Bans – Claims It Violates Their Religious Rights

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/10/satanic-temple-sues-indiana-abortion-bans-claims-violates-religious-rights/

 

[Mikhail Liebestein]

Whilst it may be Kitty, i just wanted to say tie me kangaroo down sport:

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11278229/Rolf-Harris-gravely-sick-neck-cancer-UK-paedophile-no-longer-speak.html

[CarpeDiem]

25 minutes ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

Whilst it may be Kitty, i just wanted to say tie me kangaroo down sport:

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11278229/Rolf-Harris-gravely-sick-neck-cancer-UK-paedophile-no-longer-speak.html

Private investigator and author William Merritt confirmed Harris was 'gravely sick', adding he prefers to be on his own and doesn't 'particularly like kids' as he 'hates the noise.'
 

Doesn’t like kids? What was he locked up for then? Or was it the screaming he didn’t like?

Edited October 4, 2022 by CarpeDiem

[Dickwan]

On 10/3/2022 at 12:17 AM, Our Anthony said:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11270161/Investigator-exposed-Jimmy-Savile-working-child-sex-case-against-significant-person.html - any ideas who this might be? Royalty or senior politicians according to twitter

There was already a thread on this topic:

 

[greatdayforfreedom]

On 10/3/2022 at 1:00 AM, 78ast78dgyad said:

i'm thinking royalty

 

that person was already investigated and house raided

 

why would he be untouchable?? he's a nobody basically

 

Many  would have said the same about Jimmy Savile. He was a DJ, why was he untochable? He was a 'nobody' ,and yet he could not be publicly exposed until after he died. Of course, we now know why this invidual was untouchable, he knew too much, and dead men tell no tales. It's not always  what they are, it's what they know. Perhaps the same can be said for the Elm Guest House visitor. 

[Tinfoil Hat]

They all cover their own necks by frequenting the same or overlapping circles so they've plenty of dirt on each other. Brothers in depravity. It would only take 1 of them to properly see the light and accept the consequences for their actions to pull the lot down, in theory. But they're probably at risk of their relatives being targetted for retribution, and with tentacles in the upper echelons of all establishments, they'd probably fear going to the police only to be suicided.  

[numnuts]

In my opinion, the person being referred to must be at least 70 years old now. Otherwise, it wouldn't sound natural for Williams-Thomas to say 'they will die in due course'. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?

[Steven Tansell]

On 10/2/2022 at 8:23 AM, Pickle said:

Could it be a batchelor said to visit elm guest house under the name ‘kitty’?

I think I know who you mean, he's got the nickname of 'The Raisin In The Wig', but, I heard he went of on his 'Summer Holiday' to Barbados, I don't really know how true that is though because 'We Don't Talk Anymore' since the 'Mistletoe And Wine' incident! I do know he always was, and still is, 'A Batchelor Boy' I believe he spends a lot of time watching re runs of the comedy series 'The Young Ones' on T.V.

[Anti Facts Sir]

Even discussing who it might be in coded terms is falling for the bait. MWT knows what he's doing, he's taking orders like usual. There will be no revelations or truth, just like there ain't been before now. 

 

Beyond places like this, the picture of Savile is as merely a nonce who took advantage of being able to get to a lot of young kids and teenage girls to abuse them. The narrative, out there in the mainstream, never goes beyond that. They'll bring up Broadmoor, and maybe say he liked to sleep in the morgues or whatever, but that's it. Ooh creepy guy, yeah.

 

The sinister connections to all the royals and freemasonry and everything else (Ripper etc) is glossed over. Because there is not going to be that level of revelation in the media.

[sock muppet]

16 hours ago, numnuts said:

In my opinion, the person being referred to must be at least 70 years old now. Otherwise, it wouldn't sound natural for Williams-Thomas to say 'they will die in due course'. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?

 

Could be in the queue for the next booster, others might be having a sweep stake for when they drop.

[Nemuri Kyoshiro]

On 10/2/2022 at 6:42 AM, Dickwan said:

That was my first thought

He isn't untouchable. He may be famous and all that but he's not in the same league as the real untouchables. He'd be a sop to the masses and, given the last cock-up by the BBC, the public might not believe anything said about him.