Investigator who revealed Jimmy Savile on new case, but suspect untouchable

[Mikhail Liebestein]

 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11270161/Investigator-exposed-Jimmy-Savile-working-child-sex-case-against-significant-person.html

 

• Mark Williams-Thomas exposed Savile's crimes in a 2012 ITV documentary
• The award-winning film prompted 100s of other victims to come forward 
• Now, he is working on exposing on another high profile 'significant' sex offender
• 'He will die and the floodgates will open in the same way they did with Savile'

 

The investigator who revealed Jimmy Savile's prolific paedophilia has said that he is working - and has been for some time - on exposing one other well-known living child sex offender.

 

Mark Williams-Thomas, the former police detective-turned-TV journalist who exposed Savile, claimed that the other individual has so far evaded justice because he is 'untouchable'.

 

 

 

 

[legion]

2 hours ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

Mark Williams-Thomas, the former police detective-turned-TV journalist who exposed Savile, claimed that the other individual has so far evaded justice because he is 'untouchable'.

 

So.. 

I'm guessing that either Mark Thomas is going to have an accident very soon or the untouchable individual is going to have an accident. 

Which Bookies have the best odds for Mark ?   

 

[Pickle]

Could it be a batchelor said to visit elm guest house under the name ‘kitty’?

[Dickwan]

3 hours ago, Pickle said:

Could it be a batchelor said to visit elm guest house under the name ‘kitty’?

That was my first thought

[sock muppet]

This article says the CPS won't touch it, so i do not think cr, who would be protecting him, has to be outside of entertainment and since no one has been arrested over convid outrage i would say Political/Law involvement.

 

Quote: “To date the CPS won’t prosecute. The police and I have tried really hard to get there. He will die in due course and then the floodgates will open in the same way they did with Savile. That’s not right. But justice takes many different forms.”

https://inews.co.uk/news/jimmy-savile-investigator-mark-williams-thomas-says-more-untouchable-child-sex-abusers-are-out-there-1884135

[sock muppet]

Would not surprise me to see the name Maxwell again, supposedly the artist Marina_Abramović is a Maxwell and a bloke, like yukcinda ardern is a bloke.

[Macnamara]

'untouchable'....well if the legal system gets its authority from 'the crown' then it must be someone under crown protection

[sock muppet]

7 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

'untouchable'....well if the legal system gets its authority from 'the crown' then it must be someone under crown protection

 

Might also be holding back for the midterms in the states, biodens statement recently was outrageously inappropriate.

[northern star]

36 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

'untouchable'....well if the legal system gets its authority from 'the crown' then it must be someone under crown protection

 

Exactly. What theyre saying is this person is above the law. Isnt it a criminal offence in itself to withold information about a crime, ie obstruction-of-justice or harbouring a criminal?

Meanwhile this person is out there, we assume, continuing to commit offences.

 

 

 

[TheConsultant]

The problem is we are talking about an elite pedophile and human trafficking network so you could be talking thousands of untouchables in the grand scheme

[Our Anthony]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11270161/Investigator-exposed-Jimmy-Savile-working-child-sex-case-against-significant-person.html - any ideas who this might be? Royalty or senior politicians according to twitter

[78ast78dgyad]

16 hours ago, Pickle said:

Could it be a batchelor said to visit elm guest house under the name ‘kitty’?

 

that individual is not untouchable

 

actually that individual could be arrested and few would care.

 

 

Edited October 2, 2022 by 78ast78dgyad

[greatdayforfreedom]

16 hours ago, Pickle said:

Could it be a batchelor said to visit elm guest house under the name ‘kitty’?

 

His name came to mind immediately when I saw this story.

[78ast78dgyad]

i'm thinking royalty

 

that person was already investigated and house raided

 

why would he be untouchable?? he's a nobody basically

Edited October 3, 2022 by 78ast78dgyad

[Beaujangles]

Does this help?

 

 

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/diplomatic-immunity-and-diplomatic-premises

Edited October 3, 2022 by Beaujangles

[numnuts]

I have a vague 'idea', but I don't 'think' that we are allowed to speculate about such things. Well, not on the pre-2019 forum we weren't. And with good reason.

 

P.S. I don't trust Mark Williams-Thomas.

 

 

[Tinfoil Hat]

It's a honey-trap to encourage speculation which could lead to prosecution of libel, and clamping down on freedom of speech. But it's no secret that both the (some) royals and senior politicians have a tarnished history of involvment in such vileness which has been mainly glossed over and they've been very much protected from consequences. For that reason, they utterly deserve to have people think the worst of them - it's call reaping what you sew.

[Macnamara]

20 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

The problem is we are talking about an elite pedophile and human trafficking network so you could be talking thousands of untouchables in the grand scheme

 

as david says all those rings tie in to one big ring

 

so the big ring has to protect itself otherwise the whole thing could collapse

[sock muppet]

5 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

as david says all those rings tie in to one big ring

 

so the big ring has to protect itself otherwise the whole thing could collapse

 

This is my thinking also, the price of entrance to these positions of wealth, splendour and positions of power require one to act cruelly against children and therefore silenced preserving the rest involved in such barbaric acts.

[dumbcritic]

So no further details were given of the identity, which just cranks up the tension. I do love a good cliff-hanger!

[greatdayforfreedom]

21 hours ago, 78ast78dgyad said:

 

that individual is not untouchable

 

actually that individual could be arrested and few would care.

 

 

 

But he hasn't been, despite being a Elm Guest House visitor. What does that tell you?

[sock muppet]

14 minutes ago, greatdayforfreedom said:

 

But he hasn't been, despite being a Elm Guest House visitor. What does that tell you?

 

Not much when there are bigger fish to fry, no good scaring the minnows and alerting the krakken now is there.

[Steven Tansell]

We dealt with pedo's in a different way when I was a kid='Hey kid, get in the car for a minute =promise number 1/  {I'll get you some sweets} or promise number 2/ {'I'll take you to see some cute puppies' }! The answer just had to be 'O.K., BUT SHOW US YOUR COCK FIRST'

In the winter of 1963 the temperature went down to minus 20 'C, the coldest winter since 1740 and we had blizzards like you'd never believe, in fact it affected our local flasher so badly with shrinkage that he ended up having to describe himself to any unfortunate ladies he happened across! Also, in those days, the only way to buy condoms without the lady in the local chemist telling your mam, was to go to the local barbers for a haircut! I'm not saying I was a stud, but, I was as bald as a coot by my mid twenties!

[Anti Facts Sir]

So, the floodgates opened after Savile was publicly (and posthumously) outed.

 

Did they?

 

A lot of talk, but what exactly changed. We've had a decade now of continued child-trafficking, noncing around and suspects/victims being suicided or bought off.

 

[Anti Facts Sir]

On 10/3/2022 at 2:59 AM, numnuts said:

I have a vague 'idea', but I don't 'think' that we are allowed to speculate about such things. Well, not on the pre-2019 forum we weren't. And with good reason.

 

P.S. I don't trust Mark Williams-Thomas.

 

 

Nor do I. As @Tinfoil Hat says, this is like the McAlpine thing all over again. Encouraging speculation and naming, in order to clamp down on what can be said online.

 

MWT is most likely an agent provocateur.