Jump to content

The Queen’s Death


Mikhail Liebestein

Recommended Posts

On 9/18/2022 at 9:03 AM, Beaujangles said:

 

To be honest, I've had the same thoughts. I know people can pass very quickly (worked in medical profession). But she greets the Truss woman on the Tues afternoon Must have gone to bed as normal. Then Weds no -one was rushing to her side so she must have been relatively ok...and only ones in Scotland were Charles and Anne which was likely because they were already summering there. Then Thursday her health takes a dramatic turn for the worse. She didnt appear to be gasping for air on the Tues...so no obvious respiratory ailment. Heart?... well why not say so if it was heart?  So what does that leave? .... some have said about her purple hands...but this can be normal in people who are in their 90's. The fact that no reason for her death has been given is quite strange. I'm guessing they will do the same as they did with my mother, put 'frailty of old age'... meanwhile I was there as my mother died of pneumonia.

If the Queen was frail on Tues, then why roll her out to do such a grand handover to Truss? How convenient she lasted just long enough for that!  just....

 

Excuse me for quoting myself...but the Queens cause of death comes as no surprise to me. This is the 'cover up' diagnosis. As in my quoted post...my mother died of pneumonia, at a time when they were being told to put 'covid' for all respiratory deaths. Obviously the queen had no respiratory condition.... I think whatever happened to the queen.... will stay under wraps for a long time, if not forever. 'Old age' ..... hmmmm. Did I read somewhere she 'died peacefully in her sleep'? Cant find it now...but if thats the case how did they know to go rushing to her bedside...did she talk in her sleep and say 'better hurry, you've got about 4 hours'?  🙄

 

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/29/uk/queen-elizabeth-cause-of-death-intl-scli-gbr/index.html

Edited by Beaujangles
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Steven Tansell said:

BRILLIANT 721807909_privateeye.jpg.7b31c1180ece5456a9d2d6f62078bfa7.jpg   SARCASM!👍

Wherever you look there seems to be loads of graffiti saying 'NOT MY KING'! I wonder, is it just a 'knee jerk reaction', or a 'let's jump on the bandwagon' or genuinely, a case of people waking up at last? Personally I think that the nearest Big Ears will ever get to 'KING' will be be by 'WanKING'😏 he would be as good a KING as Boris Bunter was as a Prime Minister { or should that read PRIME MINCER'? At least 'Goat Legged Lizzie' died in her sleep of old age and not 'CONVID' like many thousands of other old folk around the world, at least that put's our minds at rest, which in itself is a virtual godsend!👍🙄 Her last words were apparently 'The only way that big streak of piss will ever be King is OVER MY DEAD BODY'!:classic_angry: I wonder who's footprints they'll find on the oxygen tube?

Edited by Steven Tansell
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, numnuts said:

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/soldier-18-who-walked-beside-25152562

 

'Soldier, 18, who walked beside Queen's coffin at funeral discovered dead in Army barracks.'

 

Riiight. So another fit, healthy 18 year old just happens to be dead, for no given reason, and it's not suspicious! It's deeply normal - upsetting but mundane. How can anybody in the entire galaxy still not be seeing how wrong things are now?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/30/2022 at 9:09 PM, numnuts said:

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/soldier-18-who-walked-beside-25152562

 

'Soldier, 18, who walked beside Queen's coffin at funeral discovered dead in Army barracks.'

 

Obviously found out something, told someone he shouldn't have, and it's goodnight from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't bear the Queen any ill will. She was just a woman. And then an old lady. I don't feel she was a reptile, or drank the blood of children. She was just some old lady who for some inexplicable reason had to wear this rather ridiculous head dress called a crown. And had to do things in robotic protocol kind of ways (which would drive me nuts) She couldn't even go to Tesco's.
 It makes no sensible kind of sense, but there you go. Much of life here doesn't.

Where she's gone, she'd just a Soul. Like us all. For better or worse. Not a Queen any more, just a Soul on its journey. The sum total of what she has learned while in life here, what she's given to others, and what was in her heart etc.

Next life she might live as a checkout assistant in Chicago, might tend cows in India, might be some Inuit person, a schoolteacher, a grocery owner....whatever. Just like us all, my friends.

 

But the monarchy....well are they necessary? And they do spend a lot of our money now don't they? Bugger. That's not sensible either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, alexa said:

Apparently Princess Diana was artificially inseminated with William. Diana was a virgin at the time, so would this make William a man who has been born of a virgin ? :classic_ohmy:

 

This all sounds very sus to me.

 

 

 

That's really strange!

I noticed William was born on the Summer Solstice (probably planned) 

But something I've also noticed is the "love" for Diana resurfacing like crazy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CrowintheSnow said:

I don't bear the Queen any ill will. She was just a woman. And then an old lady. I don't feel she was a reptile, or drank the blood of children. She was just some old lady who for some inexplicable reason had to wear this rather ridiculous head dress called a crown. And had to do things in robotic protocol kind of ways (which would drive me nuts) She couldn't even go to Tesco's.
 It makes no sensible kind of sense, but there you go. Much of life here doesn't.

Where she's gone, she'd just a Soul. Like us all. For better or worse. Not a Queen any more, just a Soul on its journey. The sum total of what she has learned while in life here, what she's given to others, and what was in her heart etc.

Next life she might live as a checkout assistant in Chicago, might tend cows in India, might be some Inuit person, a schoolteacher, a grocery owner....whatever. Just like us all, my friends.

 

But the monarchy....well are they necessary? And they do spend a lot of our money now don't they? Bugger. That's not sensible either.

 

Well let's hope she comes back as one of the Aborigional kids who were abused and died at the hands of the State under her rule, and in particular, one of the ones made to kiss her feet immediately before disappearing forever. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, alexa said:

Apparently Princess Diana was artificially inseminated with William. Diana was a virgin at the time, so would this make William a man who has been born of a virgin ? :classic_ohmy:

 

This all sounds very sus to me.

 

 

 

I took him to be speculating about William having been the result of artificial insemination and commenting the if that was done while Diana was still a virgin, then it would technically have been a virgin birth.

 

It's an interesting proposition. It prompted me to see if I could find anything that backed it up, but was only able to find the allegations that the the Queen Mother was born from being artificially inseminated, and someone else had claimed in a book that QE2 & Margatet were also, although that has been denied. Mind you, there were also tales of the Queen mum's real father having been a cook becuase her his royal highness had a defective member! 

 

I came across an article though, claiming that both Diana and Kate had, at the Queen's behest, undergone an experiment before marrying Charles / William. While they were still virgins, they had their eggs introduced scientifically to their future husbands' sperm to check they would be able to provide them with heirs. I don't recall reading this when it hit the press but maybe others do? According to the source, the Dr orchestrating this exercise with Charles & Diana, instead of destroying the resulting fertilised ovum, artificially inseminated his wife with it without her knowledge as to the donors, and low & behold, a daughter was born. If this is factual, rather than pure fiction, it would make the daughter, Sarah, next in line to the throne before William. It's reported that when, as an adult, Sarah found out that her biological parents are Charlie & Di, she approached the former, appealing to him to have a DNA test but he refused to co-operate, and she's supposedly now in hiding, presumably in fear for her life.

 

https://www.anasalwa.com/en/Secret-daughter-of-Prince-Charles-and-Princess-Diane/amp/

 

All very strange fun and games. 

 

Similarly, a photo that @sickofallthebollocks posted the other week of Meghan looked very much like she had been sporting some form of prosthetic pregnancy bump. I don't know how much of this stuff is true, but frankly, I don't feel inclined to automatically discount any of it just because it all sounds bizarre. They are all a bunch of unnatural weirdos.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

 

I took him to be speculating about William having been the result of artificial insemination and commenting the if that was done while Diana was still a virgin, then it would technically have been a virgin birth.

 

It's an interesting proposition. It prompted me to see if I could find anything that backed it up, but was only able to find the allegations that the the Queen Mother was born from being artificially inseminated, and someone else had claimed in a book that QE2 & Margatet were also, although that has been denied. Mind you, there were also tales of the Queen mum's real father having been a cook becuase her his royal highness had a defective member! 

 

I came across an article though, claiming that both Diana and Kate had, at the Queen's behest, undergone an experiment before marrying Charles / William. While they were still virgins, they had their eggs introduced scientifically to their future husbands' sperm to check they would be able to provide them with heirs. I don't recall reading this when it hit the press but maybe others do? According to the source, the Dr orchestrating this exercise with Charles & Diana, instead of destroying the resulting fertilised ovum, artificially inseminated his wife with it without her knowledge as to the donors, and low & behold, a daughter was born. If this is factual, rather than pure fiction, it would make the daughter, Sarah, next in line to the throne before William. It's reported that when, as an adult, Sarah found out that her biological parents are Charlie & Di, she approached the former, appealing to him to have a DNA test but he refused to co-operate, and she's supposedly now in hiding, presumably in fear for her life.

 

https://www.anasalwa.com/en/Secret-daughter-of-Prince-Charles-and-Princess-Diane/amp/

 

All very strange fun and games. 

 

Similarly, a photo that @sickofallthebollocks posted the other week of Meghan looked very much like she had been sporting some form of prosthetic pregnancy bump. I don't know how much of this stuff is true, but frankly, I don't feel inclined to automatically discount any of it just because it all sounds bizarre. They are all a bunch of unnatural weirdos.

 

 

 

You stated that there was speculation that the king had a 'defective member'? is that similar to a 'Wonky Willy'? And did you know that when Charlie boy found out that posh totty Di was pregnant he looked into the chances of suing British Leyland because the coil in his Princess wasn't working properly?

austin.jpg.a2d7ff90c63ede945f9d2ac107f65524.jpg

Edited by Steven Tansell
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/2/2022 at 10:02 PM, Anti Facts Sir said:

 

Obviously found out something, told someone he shouldn't have, and it's goodnight from him.

JCR_SAH_040614Deepcut.jpg.82f0233e668a77ce39a94d7ac86964b8.jpg

Reminds me of the Deepcut Barracks incidents of 'suicide' new inquests into the suicides of four teenage soldiers between 1995 and 2002, no fingerprints or bullets recovered from any of the scenes of death? 🤫🤔 Pt Sean Benton 20, Pt Cheryl James 18, Pt James Collinson 17, Pt Geoff Gray 17. 🤫🤔 Surely their families need some sort of closure? 4 Young lives squandered for absolutely fuck all, I was a serving soldier and had it rough at times, but by christ those kids must have gone through the mill, and how many more are there that we don't know about? I was then a fit young light infantryman then, I'm a fat old granddad now, the only exercise I get now is jumping to it when my wife tells me to do something, when she say's jump, I always ask 'How high'!🤫

deepcut.jpg

Edited by Steven Tansell
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Steven Tansell said:

You stated that there was speculation that the king had a 'defective member'? is that similar to a 'Wonky Willy'? And did you know that when Charlie boy found out that posh totty Di was pregnant he looked into the chances of suing British Leyland because the coil in his Princess wasn't working properly?

austin.jpg.a2d7ff90c63ede945f9d2ac107f65524.jpg

 

Oh the memories, always wet and raring to go, slide in, open her up, see whats she's got, get out wetter than the weather you just drove through, the queen of my heart, sniff.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

 

I took him to be speculating about William having been the result of artificial insemination and commenting the if that was done while Diana was still a virgin, then it would technically have been a virgin birth.

 

It's an interesting proposition. It prompted me to see if I could find anything that backed it up, but was only able to find the allegations that the the Queen Mother was born from being artificially inseminated, and someone else had claimed in a book that QE2 & Margatet were also, although that has been denied. Mind you, there were also tales of the Queen mum's real father having been a cook becuase her his royal highness had a defective member! 

 

I came across an article though, claiming that both Diana and Kate had, at the Queen's behest, undergone an experiment before marrying Charles / William. While they were still virgins, they had their eggs introduced scientifically to their future husbands' sperm to check they would be able to provide them with heirs. I don't recall reading this when it hit the press but maybe others do? According to the source, the Dr orchestrating this exercise with Charles & Diana, instead of destroying the resulting fertilised ovum, artificially inseminated his wife with it without her knowledge as to the donors, and low & behold, a daughter was born. If this is factual, rather than pure fiction, it would make the daughter, Sarah, next in line to the throne before William. It's reported that when, as an adult, Sarah found out that her biological parents are Charlie & Di, she approached the former, appealing to him to have a DNA test but he refused to co-operate, and she's supposedly now in hiding, presumably in fear for her life.

 

https://www.anasalwa.com/en/Secret-daughter-of-Prince-Charles-and-Princess-Diane/amp/

 

All very strange fun and games. 

 

Similarly, a photo that @sickofallthebollocks posted the other week of Meghan looked very much like she had been sporting some form of prosthetic pregnancy bump. I don't know how much of this stuff is true, but frankly, I don't feel inclined to automatically discount any of it just because it all sounds bizarre. They are all a bunch of unnatural weirdos.

 

 

 

 

WOW- How uncanny is this tin, Sarah looks exactly like Di :classic_ohmy:

I'd hate to be mixed up with the rich & famous, it's a dangerous business.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2022 at 5:03 AM, alexa said:

Prince William pays tribute to his 'much-missed grandmother' who 'cared so much for the natural world' as he delivers his first speech since the Queen's death at a wildlife summit in London

63105275-0-image-a-13_1664902140726.jpg

The Prince of Wales, 40, praised those 'on the frontline' against commercial poachers at the summit held at the Science Museum in London.

 

78128663_ashottiger.jpg.39c38362b38e0267280f847815f73227.jpg

 

I noticed their other kills { like the missing orphaned Canadian Indian kids } aren't laid out for the world to applaud! Fucking parasites living off their hosts { US, THE PLEBS }  FOR NINETY ODD YEARS, AND THEIR WHOLE HIVE ARE STILL DOING SO !🤢

Edited by Steven Tansell
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...