Jump to content

The Queen’s Death


Mikhail Liebestein
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Fifth element said:

Prince Charles is a descendant of Vlad the Impaler and now he could become Prince of Transylvania - Mirror Online

Prince Charles is a descendant of Vlad the Impaler and now he could become Prince of Transylvania

Something not right here though..

1236-pasted-from-clipboard-png

 


Its been going on for a few years apparently:

 

https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/13/prince-charles-swollen-hands-feet-11091094/

 

Other medical sources suggest opiate use, congestive heart failure, liver issues, immune problems - could be any of those…im sure he’s in the know and being treated.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

I wonder if there's any relevance to the royal corpse being transparted from Balmoral to Holyrood House today, the 21st anniversary of 9/11? Ritual or coincidence? 

 

I believe I once read that the number 8 (also number 11)  was symbolic to the ptb, She died on the 8th and the numbers for the transportation add up to 8.

9 + 11 + 2022.  9 +1+1+2+2+2 =17  1+7 =8. I'll try to find the relevence to them...I think death is one of the meanings of the number. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said:

 

she has to look away out of shame she knows what an insufferable retard he is 

if these things are true like his servant putting 1 inch of toothpaste on his toothbrush and having his shoelaces ironed

it's no wonder he is so low functioning 

 

 

 

cpb.jpg

 

She does all the work in the bedroom, he just lies back and thinks of England.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, alexa said:

The historic Stone of Scone

This very same Stone of Jacob was then taken to ancient Ireland by the prophet Jeremiah.

 

image_2022-09-11_054539758.png.1e7158bc4d0978e37207e8d43471656c.png

Something else these royal b*stards have  pilfered.

 

that's not the stone of destiny

 

when word came that edwards men were coming to scone the stone was moved. whats more likely is that the stone in that picture was just the cover stone over the shrine in which the real stone was kept. Edwards soldiers arrived, found that stone lying there and took that in its stead. That stone is likely just a hunk of unmarked, perthshire sandstone.

 

The word on the street is that the real stone is held by a certain family. Perhaps they have not received permission to bring it back into the open.

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/10/2022 at 2:20 PM, greatdayforfreedom said:

''She was a really nice lady, and I wanted to meet her''. 🤮  She needs to watch some David Icke videos.

 

 

 

It's beyond a joke!  Yes, she is in need of deradicalisation from extreme State brainwashing.

 

Hardly any ethnics there, but plenty of white, robotic citizens.

 

Anyway, I expect this is all rather like the Queen's Diamond Jubilee all hyped up by the media, giving the impression the country was celebrating, yet most couldn't care less.

 

Edited by Orange Alert
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BeeThrive said:


Its been going on for a few years apparently:

 

https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/13/prince-charles-swollen-hands-feet-11091094/

 

Other medical sources suggest opiate use, congestive heart failure, liver issues, immune problems - could be any of those…im sure he’s in the know and being treated.

 

 

 

Yup he has been affectionately known as sausage fingers for years he also has sausage feet

4AF5E2C700000578-0-The_worst_in_a_lengthy_catalogue_of_thrills_and_spills_took_plac-a-14_1523222785856.jpg

PRC_96271199.jpg

88265c37-2ce7-4e03-81e6-be0f5c446030.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Orange Alert said:

It's beyond a joke!  Yes, she is in need of deradicalisation from extreme State brainwashing.

 

Hardly any ethnics there, but plenty of white, robotic citizens.

 

the more nuanced view to take is that the reality of the royal family is what david icke talks about with all their dodgy connections to saville and epstein and mountbattens connections to kincora boys school and all that horrific stuff but that the monarchy as an institution means something to many british people in terms of what it represents to them symbolically which is to say as an aspect of british sovereignty

 

yes you can then call into question whether or not its even right to have a monarchy but you can also at the same time recognise that conspiracy theorists and anarchists (quite a big overlap between those groups i think) are not the only people calling into question the legitimacy of monarchy as an institution and that woke neo-marxists also attack it and when you see that you then realise that there are two paths beyond monarchy: anarchy (no rulers) or neo-marxist technocracy run by the sabbatean-jewish elites

 

The point being that whilst realising that we are boiling in a frying pan we need to be careful that we don't leap out into the fire. We have to be smart or streetwise about how we go about change so that we don't just pave the way to the wrong future

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Macnamara said:

 

the more nuanced view to take is that the reality of the royal family is what david icke talks about with all their dodgy connections to saville and epstein and mountbattens connections to kincora boys school and all that horrific stuff but that the monarchy as an institution means something to many british people in terms of what it represents to them symbolically which is to say as an aspect of british sovereignty

 

yes you can then call into question whether or not its even right to have a monarchy but you can also at the same time recognise that conspiracy theorists and anarchists (quite a big overlap between those groups i think) are not the only people calling into question the legitimacy of monarchy as an institution and that woke neo-marxists also attack it and then you see that you then realise that there are two paths beyond monarchy: anarchy (no rulers) or neo-marxist technocracy run by the sabbatean-jewish elites

 

The point being that whilst realising that we are boiling in a frying pan we need to be careful that we don't leap out into the fire. We have to be smart or streetwise about how we go about change so that we don't just pave the way to the wrong future

This is a bloody good post. This shit is happening right now at full speed. It may have been countless years in the planning but now they have pulled the trigger

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

This is a bloody good post. This shit is happening right now at full speed. It may have been countless years in the planning but now they have pulled the trigger

 

There are two reasons why i don't feel jubilant about liz dying

 

firstly is from a completely practical perspective that what has actually changed in terms of us gaining greater freedom? All that has happened is that the baton has been passed from one old reptilian consciousness person who at least we never heard a peep out of except once a year when she gave a speech at christmas, which i never listened to anyway, to her younger son who is much more vocal and who we know is fully onboard with the whole great reset agenda? Nothing has actually changed for the better here. Charles is a meddling so and so who has written lots of letters to people in positions of influence seeking to influence them.

 

Secondly i'm not sure it is a good energy to cultivate. It kind of feeds into this nihilism that we are seeing growing around us where people are coming from exactly the same reptilian brain stem level of consciousness that we are criticising the elites of. It concerns me to see the scale of that because we can begin to see how all the terrible atrocities of history happened: people were in a very low state of consciousness

 

I was listening to a trade union guy giving some speeches recently and he identifies the same problems i do of the corporations exploiting the people. His chosen path to liberate the people is to seek to nationalise everything but that then takes us down that collectivist path of believing the government can solve all of our problems and before we know it we would find the state dictating to us on the finer points of our lives and unless those people that had seized control of the apparatus of the state were very 'awakened' people they would likely start pushing on us the same arguments of the WEF that we need GMO crops in order to feed us 'sustainably' and to eat bugs. They would need to start building a surveillance state to crush any dissenters and the state would become the peoples new god.

 

I just feel that the path to freedom is building it from the group up which would require people to completely change their mindset from believing that it is the role of the state to save them to a mindset where they believe that it has to come from the people at grassroots working together or alone to create the essentials of life

 

If we want to live in the shire then we need to be like the hobbits! That means we have to grow, produce, manufacture for ourselves just like our ancestors once did. i also feel that path brings greater empowerment through involvement whereas the top down approach simply makes people passive beggars to the state

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

If we want to live in the shire then we need to be like the hobbits!

I'm most of the way there. Obviously at the moment the system rules try to dictate how I do things, but I've spent 32 years working towards that dictation affecting me as little as possible. When they change for the better though very little will change for me personally except paying taxes that disappear.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bombadil said:

I'm most of the way there. Obviously at the moment the system rules try to dictate how I do things, but I've spent 32 years working towards that dictation affecting me as little as possible. When they change for the better though very little will change for me personally except paying taxes that disappear.

 

we're doing the same as you but on a smaller scale! We need more land and ideally to get offgrid for electricity. I don't know how effective solar would be in an overcast scottish winter and i know that the wind here can get strong enough to blow a chimney cowl off so if i got a smallscale turbine it would need to be able to withstand some serious conditions. If we can scale up what we are doing i would look to become a market gardener and switch jobs to that (something tells me that food is going to be a growth area in the near future!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

we're doing the same as you but on a smaller scale! We need more land and ideally to get offgrid for electricity. I don't know how effective solar would be in an overcast scottish winter and i know that the wind here can get strong enough to blow a chimney cowl off so if i got a smallscale turbine it would need to be able to withstand some serious conditions. If we can scale up what we are doing i would look to become a market gardener and switch jobs to that (something tells me that food is going to be a growth area in the near future!)

I don't want to tell you how to do stuff you already know but if land is limited the only way is up. i can grow 100 lettuces in one square meter. I might have a lot of land but I am determined to put as much aside for nature as is realistic. Not daft I need to feed my family first. I have a stream flowing through the land so made my own dynamo system to charge batteries etc. If you're in Scotland imo you should be thinking creatively how to use the abundant rainfall to your advantage. That imo is your true potential for energy independence. It also alleviates your concerns on high wind issues

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/8/2022 at 8:27 PM, Tinfoil Hat said:

I do feel something - can't stand the Royals but it's just the fact that she's always been there as a fixture in the background for my entire life, so I acknowledge that it's the end of an era.

 

I took a lot of time out, from thinking about all of this the past few days. It's easy to get up caught up in their energy, no matter how awake you think you are, then you don't think so clearly. Whether I like it or not, even though I am not that old, the Queen was also a part of my psyche for many years before I woke up. The last time I felt a bit weird like this, was when Leonard Nimoy, Christopher Lee, Patrick Macnee and George Cole all died within a 6 month period back in 2015. Collectively, they played a huge role in what I saw on TV growing up.

 

 

 

On 9/8/2022 at 8:29 PM, Macnamara said:

it feels like the end of an era

 

The masonic mass media are already calling Charles a climate loving globalist. That little worm, John Kerry, has been lovingly heralded as a U.N. climate change envoy. Funny that, as I thought countries sent envoys to the U.N., so as to work there together. Not the other way round. If they can't fudge us back in to the E.U., then they will just make the U.N. what the E.U was. They are plotting.  

 

P.S. Whenever I see John Kerry's face, then I just want to to tie him to a chair for 33 minutes or so, while vigorously pulling/twisting/flicking his hair, ears and nostrils. With a good, satisfying splashing, so as to finish off proceedings. Punishment to be repeated daily, until he agrees to give Terry Griffiths his haircut back.

 

092419_johnkerry_jk.jpg

 

 

 

On 9/8/2022 at 5:31 PM, eddy64 said:

i dunno i think we might look back fondly on lizzy once mad king charles has be on the throne a while.

 

It's Prince William we want to worry about. Regardless of whether he is actually a freemason, or just a fellatioer of, matters not. He is their man. Charles won't abdicate the throne, which will be William's role. I wouldn't be surprised, if Charles gets bumped off somehow, in the next few years. This would be because it's hard to complete the denationalisation of the U.K., in the mass consciousness of the general public, with a monarchy still in place. This is why, in the past decade or so, we have seen the streamlining of the royal family; Harry being shipped off to the U.S., under the guidance of M.K. Megan; Andrew's reputation heavily attacked; and, more recently, Charles's reputation also attacked. As for Prince Edward, I think he has been willingly sidelined. They don't want there to be any viable alternatives to William, when the time comes. One thing I constantly notice, on various threads, on various internet forums, of a certain ilk, is how Prince William seems to avoid a lot of the proverbial royal bashing. Funny that... 

     

 

 

On 9/8/2022 at 5:37 PM, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

She is a link with the past. When she was crowned, the British Empire was still a going concern. On her watch, the country dwindled from being a world power, a massive industrialized nation, into what we are today. And although I no longer live in the UK, when she goes, people might start to see what we've become. A frightening thought.

 

You just reminded me of something interesting I read recently, which surprised me a lot. I was looking up something random on the Wikipedia page of 'X the Unknown' (1956) and read the following:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_the_Unknown

 

'The film is significant in that "it firmly established Hammer's transition from B-movie thrillers to out-and-out horror/science fiction" and, with The Quatermass Xperiment (1955) and Quatermass 2 (1957), completes "an important trilogy containing relevant allegorical threads revealing Cold War anxieties and a diminishing national identity resulting from Britain's decrease in status as a world power".'

 

I would have expected to read that sort of rhetoric about a film released in the late 1970's or 1980's; certainly not about a film released in 1956.

 

 

 

On 9/9/2022 at 6:40 PM, KingKitty said:

I changed my mind after watching. I don't think he's gonna step down right away, if at all. You'll just have to wait for him to die before the kid gets the crown. I bet People Magazine is just as disappointed.

 

Yes, it's just a case of 'when' he dies or becomes unfit to rule. I really don't think that 'certain parties' want to hang about waiting either.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Fifth element said:

Prince Charles is a descendant of Vlad the Impaler and now he could become Prince of Transylvania - Mirror Online

Prince Charles is a descendant of Vlad the Impaler and now he could become Prince of Transylvania

Something not right here though..

1236-pasted-from-clipboard-png

 

 

 

Screenshot_20220911-171819.png

Edited by Greenhulk50
Fix
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, alexa said:

The historic Stone of Scone will be transported from Edinburgh Castle to London for Charles's coronation

 

  • The Stone of Destiny will be moved from Edinburgh Castle for the Coronation
  • When Queen Elizabeth II was crowned in 1953 her thrown sat upon the stone

It was returned to Scotland to Scotland in 1996 to mark its original removal 

 

In the Bible Jacob used a stone as a pillow because that was customary for his time. In this story, Jacob had a vision of God and angels going up and down stairs leading to Heaven, and in the morning, he used that stone pillow as a memorial.

This very same Stone of Jacob was then taken to ancient Ireland by the prophet Jeremiah.

 

image_2022-09-11_054539758.png.1e7158bc4d0978e37207e8d43471656c.png

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11200587/Stone-Destiny-transported-Edinburgh-Castle-London-Charless-coronation.html

 

Something else these royal b*stards have  pilfered.

 

They should drop it on his head .

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, numnuts said:

 

It's Prince William we want to worry about. Regardless of whether he is actually a freemason, or just a fellatioer of, matters not. He is their man. Charles won't abdicate the throne, which will be William's role. I wouldn't be surprised, if Charles gets bumped off somehow, in the next few years. This would be because it's hard to complete the denationalisation of the U.K., in the mass consciousness of the general public, with a monarchy still in place.

 

My thoughts exactly - Thank you 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

that's not the stone of destiny

 

when word came that edwards men were coming to scone the stone was moved. whats more likely is that the stone in that picture was just the cover stone over the shrine in which the real stone was kept. Edwards soldiers arrived, found that stone lying there and took that in its stead. That stone is likely just a hunk of unmarked, perthshire sandstone.

 

The word on the street is that the real stone is held by a certain family. Perhaps they have not received permission to bring it back into the open.

Also I expect going right back  there were many stones when smaller tribal areas  like rock with footprint in it in that Argyle " hillfort" etc and all over .

 Interesting that near  Dunadd  are   lot of  knight Templar Graves I remember with long sword engraved grave stones from later times as if drawn to that area ?(sorry gone bit off topic but is kind of linked )

Bloodlines!

 as with this royalty  it would be interesting  if all  those modern leaders and famous stars were DNA tested as Joseph Atwill  has often said too.

But don't think they will Oblige .

 

Edited by Talorgan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...