Jump to content

The Queen’s Death


Mikhail Liebestein

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, andy1033 said:

The jews claim they control everything.

 

I don't know if they don't have all the power. It's possible that there are bigger controllers that use them as a buffer to escape criticism.

 

They're pretty brazen if they don't have much power though. The ones that do the "fellow white" crap I mean, then say they're Js to escape the backlash.

 

It's funny because someone was calling out the elephant in the room on 4chan last night, then someone made the same argument saying what about folks like Hillary and the Pope. They said what you said that they're Luciferian, but folks like Hillary have tribe ancestry, and the Pope embraces the Talmud. There was other names, but I can't remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, HAARPING_On said:

Having had time to think about the news and digest it a little I’ve had a number of thoughts in my head since yesterday evening...

 

The timing of the death announcement seems “important.” Most people will see it as 08/09/2022 but the announcement would have arrived in the eastern Commonwealth countries on 09/09/2022... Is this significant?

 

Now, I may be wrong here but I’m pretty sure the “announcement” came at 6.33pm or 18.33hrs in the UK as the news bulletin was just about to finish on the radio and was interrupted with breaking news... I made a note of the time when it happened, that’s when I heard it, that was my observation. Very convenient numerology.

 

The announcement also comes very close to the harvest moon which I'm not well up on but I’m sure some people may be able to add further information as to the relevance or significance...

 

In astrology, mercury retrogrades from 9th September to 2nd October, not sure which sign it tracks back into but again this may have some significance..

 

As I’ve said previously on here, I’ve been of the opinion the Queen has  been dead for some time so the announcement didn’t come as any great surprise to me and I certainly didn’t feel any emotion about it, all I could think of was the “the timing.”

 

Two other things have been pecking my head since last night too...

 

The first is protocol. There is a very strict protocol to be followed when a royal death occurs, everything from the funeral to the coronation of the new monarch. We need to watch this closely as things may not be done “correctly” effectively rendering them illegitimate.

 

Brian Gerrish from the UK Column touched on this some time back on the opening of parliament where the Queen did not wear her crown and the jewels were placed on a stand next to the Monarch.

 

The other thing we need to keep an eye on is bills or legislation slipping through Parliament while everyone is “in mourning.” I wouldn’t put it past this bunch of treacherous rats in Westminster to try and rush through as much legislation as possible while people are distracted. This needs to be watched very closely.

 

We live in uncertain times, and I’m pretty sure we are heading into unchartered waters, certainly with Charlie on the throne and all his WEF connections... only time will tell.


I took a peek at her natal transit chart for yesterday , as i often find death charts extremely well matched with the natal.

 


From this i see saturn controlling her whole chart - saturn ‘diminishes’ everything it touches…it over-rules….she had saturn conjunt her MC in her natal - meaning she would rule over others/disciplined life/‘work’role rules life.

Yesterdays transits was smack-bang moon conjunct transit saturn conjuncting her ‘life force’ mars jupiter conjunction in house 1 (physical body). A younger person would likely have been ill, or in an accident, but due to her age, it was enough diminishing energy to pull life force away.

 

Transit sun of yesterday was approaching closely cusp of house 8 - house of death. I am inclined to think that her time of birth is a few minutes out (which is extremely common) as we usually see transit sun hit cusp of house 8 and thats a good trigger for a ‘death event’ (loss of body/job/home/relationship)

 

Back to Satan…i mean saturn 😆….saturn in the sky yesterday was squaring her MC - which has saturn ruling it. When we have saturn square saturn its a very diminishing energy, and that coupled with the power of it conjuncting her MC ‘life path’ point - its a force not many would withstand. 
Opposite her saturn conjunct MC natal major power - we have fixed star algol conjunct her IC - algol is a nasty fixed star. Fixed star astrology is interesting, many stars are very beneficient, but we rarely have a good time if algol is prominent in our charts, or if it gets struck by the days transits. Saturn opposite algol is just plain nasty horrid combo….very diminishing. 

With death of the native of the chart we look to house 8 sign and ruler - virgo/mercury in this case. Transit mercury conjuncts her ‘part of fortune’ or misfortune as it can also turn out to be. This POF point in her chart is in house 8 of death.  Mercury is bounding retrograde at the moment so this has the energy turning inwards. 
Transit mercury was opposite her natal mercury in house 2 - with that natal mercury having jupier ‘enlarge’ that tense opposition.

 

8th house of death/part of forune - in libra - take a look at where venus is which rules that…..ahhh we see its in house 2 of ‘values and personal things’ - and a huge element about her venus is, its unaspected except with pluto - planet of power/death. Which is opposite her AC - physical ego body. These positions and aspects tell me that her love of her life dying caused her death. They were a power couple, giving each other power - and 1 without the other, kills power in both. They were deeply bonded - and the relationship was ‘part of fortune and misfortune’ - because it caused great power when together, but without the power there’s none at all. Rug pulled. Philip dying triggered her power loss. 
Its the classic story of love that heightens our experience of life to levels unimaginable, but, the other side of that shiny coin is often that love, then has the power to undo us. 
So often death is due to a broken heart.

 

There’s other aspect to yesterdays transits that support it as a death day for the body/psyche native of the birthchart, but wont extra[olate as its not an astrology forum and the terms are gobbledigook if unknown. 
 

Her death occurred in balmoral not london where she was born. I suspect if i were to do a relocational scotland chart for her, we would see the transit sun of yesterday hitting the place of death more exact in her chart. 
 

So, going by her chart with yesterdays transits being so strong, i think she did really die yesterday.

However, the crow sitting for hours on the wings of the  ‘Angel of Truth’ victoria memorial at Buckingham palace yesterday on the live internet feed, gave me the clue she had died, and it took a few hours to gather the family etc to make the announcement. 
 

Here’s her chart with yesterdays transits on the outside (transit moon was conjunct transit saturn at time of death) for anyone interested:


 

8D6A8751-B3C2-4B1B-A82E-4E2EE313925C.jpeg.2d425500d05698ec7dc61282dc93dad1.jpeg

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Golden Retriever said:

King Charles III Was Circumcised by Jewish Mohel, Cherishes UK Jews

When Philip Arthur George, the first child of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten, was born, on November 14, 1948, his mother hired Rabbi Jacob Snowman, a well-known London physician and mohel in December 1948 to circumcise her son. Snowman circumcised other members of the British nobility and Royal Family, and the princess was reportedly highly satisfied with the Rabbi’s work. The royal family tradition of hiring Jewish mohels to circumcise their sons goes back to Queen Victoria.

 

https://www.jewishpress.com/news/jewish-news/king-charles-iii-was-circumcised-by-jewish-mohel-cherishes-uk-jews/2022/09/09/

 

This would suggest to me the Queen and her family have Jewish roots, hence their close relationships with many

elite Jews, including the Rothschilds.

 

prince-charles-prince-of-wales-speaks-wi

 

 

Crypto-Charlie ... gotcha 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ethel said:

No dot connector videocast from David on the subject as yet. I'm kinda disappointed. He has uploaded a video from 2018 on the subject of the royals and it was one of my favourites that he ever did. It's hilarious - he's surrounded by union jack flags and sarcastically talks about Harry and Megan's wedding as a great "national celebration". 

 

I was thinking about the ostentatious outpouring of grief from people today. I went into my local supermarket and saw all of the newspapers with their overblown, cloying tributes and actually, I shit you not, felt a tear coming into my eye. I swear to God. And then it hit me - it's social contagion. 

 

Social contagion is: "the spread of an entity or influence in a society via interactions between agents. Examples are the spreading of fads, rumors or riots".

 

Or grief.

 

If this force can even affect someone who is a staunch anarchist, completely opposed to the idea of royalty and who believes that the royals are half-human, half-reptilian hybrids who are in all likelihood Satanists and cannibals, imagine what this force of social contagion does to the average person.

 

Either way, all jokes and memes aside, and boy there were some funny ones, I am an anarchist spirit and I will die an anarchist. Watching people unconsciously giving their power (and their money) away to this woman and her family is beyond sickening. The over the top outpouring of so-called grief is actually a projection; it is a metaphor for the grief people feel for their own sovereignty - which they chose to bury in their unconscious somewhere in early childhood. 

 

The royals have only one thing in their favour in my eyes - they view themselves as sovereign beings. They see themselves as having divine sovereignty. The only problem is, the rest of humanity don't, which is why we can have a scenario in which billions of human beings are happy to give their power and money away to a woman and her family who literally wouldn't spit on any of her subjects if they were on fire. My capacity for reading the minutiae of human body language is second to none and I have never seen the Queen crack a genuine smile. She has nothing but the most profound contempt for her "subjects" which makes perfect sense and is almost a perfect mirror since, in stating that they need to be "ruled over", those people clearly have nothing but profound contempt for themselves.

 

She is not, and never was my sovereign, and neither will her jug-eared son be. I am my sovereign. I suggest the royalists on here have a long, hard think about reclaiming their sovereignty.

Well said Ethel, and you me and many others with brain cells working, did not give this inbred lowlife the permission to call us, her subjects. So i would advise jug ears, to bin that notion forthwith.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, webtrekker said:

 

Aww, c'mon, we all know she keeps her marmalade sandwich in there! 😉

 

BTW, I wonder who actually died? Liz, or her sister Lilibet? -

 

https://www.reformation.org/queens-elizabeth-and-lilibet.html

 

 

 

 

I'm out of likes but I enjoyed looking at that. I may get the book. I've never seen it before but I've thought to myself that the queen has looked like 2 different people on occasion - a thought I kept to myself as it makes me sound a bit mad, but I would not reject the idea of there having been twins out of hand.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

 

I'm out of likes but I enjoyed looking at that. I may get the book. I've never seen it before but I've thought to myself that the queen has looked like 2 different people on occasion - a thought I kept to myself as it makes me sound a bit mad, but I would not reject the idea of there having been twins out of hand.

 

Yes, it does sound a bit left-field, but what isn't these days, considering all of the stories of the Queen's 'secret cousins' for instance?

 

I've saved it as a PDF for anyone wishing to keep it as a future reference ...

 

https://fudgeys.co.uk/two_queens.pdf [Updated just now with clickable links in the document]

 

THE TOP SECRET BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY TWINS REVEALED AT LAST!

 
IN 1926, TWINS WERE BORN IN LONDON TO ELIZABETH BOWES-LYON WHICH
SHE NAMED ELIZABETH AND LILIBET. IN 1930, ANOTHER GIRL NAMED
MARGARET WAS BORN IN GLAMIS CASTLE, SCOTLAND!!
 
 
 

 

Edited by webtrekker
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, webtrekker said:

 

Yes, it does sound a bit left-field, but what isn't these days, considering all of the stories of the Queen's 'secret cousins' for instance?

 

I've saved it as a PDF for anyone wishing to keep it as a future reference ...

 

https://fudgeys.co.uk/two_queens.pdf [Updated just now with clickable links in the document]

 

THE TOP SECRET BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY TWINS REVEALED AT LAST!

 
IN 1926, TWINS WERE BORN IN LONDON TO ELIZABETH BOWES-LYON WHICH
SHE NAMED ELIZABETH AND LILIBET. IN 1930, ANOTHER GIRL NAMED
MARGARET WAS BORN IN GLAMIS CASTLE, SCOTLAND!!
 
 
 

 

and it mentions flat earth 3 times

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

 

KC3 

 

K = Kilo = 10^3 = 3rd order of magnitude 

 

C =  3rd letter 

 

3  =   3

 

3 3 3 

 

 

 

I'm open to most things but I really don't get all this Numerology stuff I'm afraid.

 

For instance: take your initials 'ML' (Mikhail Liebestein) ...

 

'M' is the 13th letter of the alphabet. 13 => 3+1 = 4

'L' is the 12th letter of the alphabet. 12 => 1+2 = 3

 

4-3= 1 (remember this)

 

Now, 13+12 = 25 => 2^5 =32, plus the 1 from above is ... 33

 

The fact is, you can make all kinds of inferences from practically any set of random numbers or letters.

 

Also, I really don't think the 'elite' are that clever, or even interested in wrangling numbers. Yes, they may think it's funny making many of the vaxx injured 33 years old, but I think that's as far as their imagination goes. 🤔 Personally, I think most of those articles are conjured up by thick MSM journos anyway.

 

 

 

 

Edited by webtrekker
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

Apologies - off topic here - Rishi looks like a woman there?  I know his jacket is buttoned up (so tight) but he looks like he has hips and the way his arms hang, like the way a womans arms hang when they walk? 
Sorry - back on topic - might continue this on tranny thread.....

His hips seems kinda tiny no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just seen Charly boy go into Buck palace, It seems the crests are back on the main gates. I might be wrong but im sure they were removed a while ago. Can anyone comfirm this. If so then when they removed the crests is that when the queen really died? Also looking at charly today with all the sheep,he didnt seem that upset for someone who lost there mum yesterday.

Edited by Captainlove
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

I can't see our replacements respecting common law

 

they have no tradition of it in their countries of origin so they have no point of reference for it. They will likely not even know it is an option that is open to them

 

I think that is a big part of why all of that is going on: to water down and dilute those with notions of:

-individual liberty

-common law rights

-constitutional rights

-a sense of identity

 

What we end up with is a soup of divided people all agitating against each other who then look to the all powerful state to keep the peace. With no unifying identity they are more inclined then to see themselves as global citizens which is why the brexit vote was such a close run thing

 

If a british government located in london is hard to hold to account then how impossible would a global government sitting on top of a giant smart grid run by artificial intelligence that controls every single electrical and digital appliance on the planet, be to hold to account?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

It's funny because someone was calling out the elephant in the room on 4chan last night, then someone made the same argument saying what about folks like Hillary and the Pope. They said what you said that they're Luciferian, but folks like Hillary have tribe ancestry, and the Pope embraces the Talmud. There was other names, but I can't remember.

 

yeah they look at people like AOC and think they identify as 'hispanic'.....well maybe for the cameras she does

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Says Her Family Tree Includes Sephardic Jews Who Were Forced To Flee Spain Or Convert To Catholicism

By Donica Phifer On 12/9/18 at 10:55 PM EST
Incoming New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez revealed a portion of her family history of Sunday during a Hanukkah candle lighting.

Haaretz reports that Ocasio-Cortez gave a speech during the event held at the Jackson Heights Jewish Center in Queens, telling attendees that her family has recently discovered that they are descended from Sephardic Jews.

https://www.newsweek.com/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-says-her-family-tree-includes-sephardic-jews-who-1251487

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

they have no tradition of it in their countries of origin so they have no point of reference for it. They will likely not even know it is an option that is open to them

 

I think that is a big part of why all of that is going on: to water down and dilute those with notions of:

-individual liberty

-common law rights

-constitutional rights

-a sense of identity

 

What we end up with is a soup of divided people all agitating against each other who then look to the all powerful state to keep the peace. With no unifying identity they are more inclined then to see themselves as global citizens which is why the brexit vote was such a close run thing

 

If a british government located in london is hard to hold to account then how impossible would a global government sitting on top of a giant smart grid run by artificial intelligence that controls every single electrical and digital appliance on the planet, be to hold to account?

They think they are smart. I cant see their 4th tecno revolution going that well, Where i live the internet is up and down like the syrian empire, Public services are a joke. I just don't see the plan working. Also the rail service is always late. People are still to tribal at heart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...