Jump to content

The Queen’s Death


Mikhail Liebestein

Recommended Posts

SEI_122192863.jpg.07dcee6cde1c497f8c6deecb5eda1c61.jpg

 

OK I vaguely heard long ago that there was something about the handbag always being there? ?.. but going on about her frailty - holding a bag and stick seems so theatrical. 

 

The speeches in the house are so over loaded with 'in sentences', even Boris said we thought she was immortal, or words to that effect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No dot connector videocast from David on the subject as yet. I'm kinda disappointed. He has uploaded a video from 2018 on the subject of the royals and it was one of my favourites that he ever did. It's hilarious - he's surrounded by union jack flags and sarcastically talks about Harry and Megan's wedding as a great "national celebration". 

 

I was thinking about the ostentatious outpouring of grief from people today. I went into my local supermarket and saw all of the newspapers with their overblown, cloying tributes and actually, I shit you not, felt a tear coming into my eye. I swear to God. And then it hit me - it's social contagion. 

 

Social contagion is: "the spread of an entity or influence in a society via interactions between agents. Examples are the spreading of fads, rumors or riots".

 

Or grief.

 

If this force can even affect someone who is a staunch anarchist, completely opposed to the idea of royalty and who believes that the royals are half-human, half-reptilian hybrids who are in all likelihood Satanists and cannibals, imagine what this force of social contagion does to the average person.

 

Either way, all jokes and memes aside, and boy there were some funny ones, I am an anarchist spirit and I will die an anarchist. Watching people unconsciously giving their power (and their money) away to this woman and her family is beyond sickening. The over the top outpouring of so-called grief is actually a projection; it is a metaphor for the grief people feel for their own sovereignty - which they chose to bury in their unconscious somewhere in early childhood. 

 

The royals have only one thing in their favour in my eyes - they view themselves as sovereign beings. They see themselves as having divine sovereignty. The only problem is, the rest of humanity don't, which is why we can have a scenario in which billions of human beings are happy to give their power and money away to a woman and her family who literally wouldn't spit on any of her subjects if they were on fire. My capacity for reading the minutiae of human body language is second to none and I have never seen the Queen crack a genuine smile. She has nothing but the most profound contempt for her "subjects" which makes perfect sense and is almost a perfect mirror since, in stating that they need to be "ruled over", those people clearly have nothing but profound contempt for themselves.

 

She is not, and never was my sovereign, and neither will her jug-eared son be. I am my sovereign. I suggest the royalists on here have a long, hard think about reclaiming their sovereignty.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Macnamara said:

People can mock the symbols of british sovereignty but what is it that they are putting forward to replace it? 

 

The only ethical society is an anarchist one. But then, you know this already since, as I recall, you are a Mark Passio supporter and deep down know he is right when he points to anarchy as the only ethical way to create societies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ethel said:

No dot connector videocast from David on the subject as yet. I'm kinda disappointed. He has uploaded a video from 2018 on the subject of the royals and it was one of my favourites that he ever did. It's hilarious - he's surrounded by union jack flags and sarcastically talks about Harry and Megan's wedding as a great "national celebration". 

 

I was thinking about the ostentatious outpouring of grief from people today. I went into my local supermarket and saw all of the newspapers with their overblown, cloying tributes and actually, I shit you not, felt a tear coming into my eye. I swear to God. And then it hit me - it's social contagion. 

 

Social contagion is: "the spread of an entity or influence in a society via interactions between agents. Examples are the spreading of fads, rumors or riots".

 

Or grief.

 

If this force can even affect someone who is a staunch anarchist, completely opposed to the idea of royalty and who believes that the royals are half-human, half-reptilian hybrids who are in all likelihood Satanists and cannibals, imagine what this force of social contagion does to the average person.

 

Either way, all jokes and memes aside, and boy there were some funny ones, I am an anarchist spirit and I will die an anarchist. Watching people unconsciously giving their power (and their money) away to this woman and her family is beyond sickening. The over the top outpouring of so-called grief is actually a projection; it is a metaphor for the grief people feel for their own sovereignty - which they chose to bury in their unconscious somewhere in early childhood. 

 

The royals have only one thing in their favour in my eyes - they view themselves as sovereign beings. They see themselves as having divine sovereignty. The only problem is, the rest of humanity don't, which is why we can have a scenario in which billions of human beings are happy to give their power and money away to a woman and her family who literally wouldn't spit on any of her subjects if they were on fire. My capacity for reading the minutiae of human body language is second to none and I have never seen the Queen crack a genuine smile. She has nothing but the most profound contempt for her "subjects" which makes perfect sense and is almost a perfect mirror since, in stating that they need to be "ruled over", those people clearly have nothing but profound contempt for themselves.

 

She is not, and never was my sovereign, and neither will her jug-eared son be. I am my sovereign. I suggest the royalists on here have a long, hard think about reclaiming their sovereignty.

 

That's because, unlike the ruling class, we have empathy, and if we see sadness, we feel some ourselves.

 

However, that changes to disgust and anger when you consider the ugly comparison between what's happening now with the passing of all those poor old sods who were isolated from comfort of their loved ones so that they could die in fear and confusion in the name of Covid.

 

It will just take some dick headed celebrity to produce a special song for the occasion for me to start literally vomiting. How dire was it when Elton John released Candle in the Wind, written specifically in memory of Marilyn Munroe, then, in the worst possible taste, pushed out again, re-dedicated to Diana. Mark my words, these sycophantic, attention grabbing arseholes won't be able to help themselves.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

 

That's because, unlike the ruling class, we have empathy, and if we see sadness, we feel some ourselves.

 

However, that changes to disgust and anger when you consider the ugly comparison between what's happening now with the passing of all those poor old sods who were isolated from comfort of their loved ones so that they could die in fear and confusion in the name of Covid.

 

It will just take some dick headed celebrity to produce a special song for the occasion for me to start literally vomiting. How dire was it when Elton John released Candle in the Wind, written specifically in memory of Marilyn Munroe, then, in the worst possible taste, pushed out again, re-dedicated to Diana. Mark my words, these sycophantic, attention grabbing arseholes won't be able to help themselves.

3rd time lucky?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

Michael Fagan, the bloke who managed to get into the queen's bedroom one night in 1982. He asked her for a cigarette.

 

I vagely recall  him saying that her eyes were 'black'? I'd be interested in seeing David Icke speak with Michael Fagan. To my knowledge he hasn't. I don't know if he is still alive.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

King Charles III Was Circumcised by Jewish Mohel, Cherishes UK Jews

When Philip Arthur George, the first child of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten, was born, on November 14, 1948, his mother hired Rabbi Jacob Snowman, a well-known London physician and mohel in December 1948 to circumcise her son. Snowman circumcised other members of the British nobility and Royal Family, and the princess was reportedly highly satisfied with the Rabbi’s work. The royal family tradition of hiring Jewish mohels to circumcise their sons goes back to Queen Victoria.

 

https://www.jewishpress.com/news/jewish-news/king-charles-iii-was-circumcised-by-jewish-mohel-cherishes-uk-jews/2022/09/09/

 

This would suggest to me the Queen and her family have Jewish roots, hence their close relationships with many

elite Jews, including the Rothschilds.

 

prince-charles-prince-of-wales-speaks-wi

 

  • Like 5
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

King Charles III Was Circumcised by Jewish Mohel, Cherishes UK Jews

When Philip Arthur George, the first child of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten, was born, on November 14, 1948, his mother hired Rabbi Jacob Snowman, a well-known London physician and mohel in December 1948 to circumcise her son. Snowman circumcised other members of the British nobility and Royal Family, and the princess was reportedly highly satisfied with the Rabbi’s work. The royal family tradition of hiring Jewish mohels to circumcise their sons goes back to Queen Victoria.

 

https://www.jewishpress.com/news/jewish-news/king-charles-iii-was-circumcised-by-jewish-mohel-cherishes-uk-jews/2022/09/09/

 

This would suggest to me the Queen and her family have Jewish roots, hence their close relationships with many

elite Jews, including the Rothschilds.

 

prince-charles-prince-of-wales-speaks-wi

 

Thats very interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

the destabilisation of society will deepen and widen as they bring us to a fever pitch of crisis and then out of the ashes of that sabotaged world they will offer their solution: membership of a new global technocracy. The price to pay? The loss of everything you hold dear.

 

There will be more random stabbings, shootings, sucker punchings, rapes, thefts and all the rest until the spirit of the people is utterly broken

 

People can mock the symbols of british sovereignty but what is it that they are putting forward to replace it? I have tried to discuss ideas around the common law and constitution but otherwise what exactly are the things going to be that bind this society together moving forward?

 

Most people don't think on this level. They see only what is immediately in front of them. What i read in some peoples comments is unthinking nihilism

 

The disintegration or rather the controlled demolition of british society is deepening and the howling mob is so blind in its rage that it is playing right into the hands of the global corporate elites, who are all of the same bloodlines as the royal family so don't kid yourselves that the technocracy represents some sort of liberation from patriarchal british monarchy!.....its just a new deeper expression of complete control by the same old power players which is why the soon to be king charles is right in there making all the right WEF and UN talking points

 

People are so blind

 

I can't see our replacements respecting common law, but I hope I'm wrong. A lot of people will welcome Zion and the destruction of their country because they think our problems stem from Germans or Nazis, so they'll welcome whatever alternatives.

 

Biden? Nazi

Queen Elizabeth II? Nazi

Trump? Nazi

Merkel? Nazi

Zelensky? Nazi

Antifa? Nazis

Tommy Robinstein? Nazi

Priti Patel? Nazi

Bill Gates? Nazi

Klaus Schwab? Nazi

 

I could go on, but I think you get where I'm going with this. Infantile understanding of politics and genealogy has fvcked us hard. Don't like those Nazis? Well, we have an even more Zio system coming your way, slaves. That's how I think it will be. Controlled ops and a boot stamping on your face forever.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Observations said:

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/liz-truss-prime-minister-official/

 

There are other shots of the mantleplace clock. 

 

And it says Boris spent 40 mins with the Queen 

Is there a photo? 

 

If you flip the liz photo the lack of eye contact looks even worse. They're not even trying are they? I guess they don't want to?

 

20220909_114152.png.1ba635188fbd5de65c27f2a19ec4a2fc.png

Liz was 5'4" 

Truss is 5'3"

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

on't like those Nazis? Well, we have an even more Zio system coming your way, slaves

 

Bob Moran alluded to this with a recent cartoon.

 

The merger of heads of states wearing the Star of David and the Rainbow logo with the Natiobnal Socialist symbol on the way out at the bottom

of the image.

 

Fb-Z7BiXoAQMLGX?format=jpg&name=4096x409

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

King Charles III Was Circumcised by Jewish Mohel, Cherishes UK Jews

When Philip Arthur George, the first child of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten, was born, on November 14, 1948, his mother hired Rabbi Jacob Snowman, a well-known London physician and mohel in December 1948 to circumcise her son. Snowman circumcised other members of the British nobility and Royal Family, and the princess was reportedly highly satisfied with the Rabbi’s work. The royal family tradition of hiring Jewish mohels to circumcise their sons goes back to Queen Victoria.

 

https://www.jewishpress.com/news/jewish-news/king-charles-iii-was-circumcised-by-jewish-mohel-cherishes-uk-jews/2022/09/09/

 

This would suggest to me the Queen and her family have Jewish roots, hence their close relationships with many

elite Jews, including the Rothschilds.

 

prince-charles-prince-of-wales-speaks-wi

 

 

Not only did the Jewish Mohel circumcise Charles and possibly others, his Jewish in-laws were commissioned to provide the wedding rings

of Prince Charles and Camilla and Prince William and Kate Middleton (mother Goldsmith). 

 

Very strange don't cha think, when the Queen was the head of the Church of England?

 

JACOB SNOWMAN

 

Jacob Snowman (24 November 1871 – 28 February 1959)[1] was a British physician and mohel,[2] notable for having circumcised Charles, Prince of Wales in December 1948,[3] and possibly other members of the British nobility and Royal Family.[4]

 

Snowman was the son of Abraham Snowman (1849–1918), a picture dealer, and his wife Rachel, both of whom were born in Poland. He was the older brother to both painter Isaac Snowman (1873-1947) and jeweler Emanuel Snowman (1886-1970), who married into the prominent Wartski family of jewelers and became the company chairman.[4]

 

Wartski has enjoyed generations of Royal patronage, supplying the Welsh gold wedding bands for Charles and the former Camilla Parker-Bowles, as well as the bands worn by Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and the former Kate Middleton.[

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Snowman

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SugarRay said:

Perhaps The Queen's picture was actually ready to shake hands with little Rishi Sunak 😂

-1x-1.jpg

Apologies - off topic here - Rishi looks like a woman there?  I know his jacket is buttoned up (so tight) but he looks like he has hips and the way his arms hang, like the way a womans arms hang when they walk? 
Sorry - back on topic - might continue this on tranny thread.....

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Observations said:

OK I vaguely heard long ago that there was something about the handbag always being there? ?.. but going on about her frailty - holding a bag and stick seems so theatrical. 

 

Aww, c'mon, we all know she keeps her marmalade sandwich in there! 😉

 

BTW, I wonder who actually died? Liz, or her sister Lilibet? -

 

https://www.reformation.org/queens-elizabeth-and-lilibet.html

 

 

 

Edited by webtrekker
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...