The Queen’s Death

[Talorgan]

Let's see if Charles speaks out about fracking although it's the people really that need to ( and regain their own sovereignty)

 

Edited September 9, 2022 by Talorgan

[Saved]

7 hours ago, Athenry04 said:

Still maintain she's been dead since last year, and the stockholm syndrome currently being displayed on facebook is astonishing and sickening. I'm baffled.

I'm staying well clear of that place, though it's the only place where I converse with certain family members.

 

I can well imagine what is being posted and by whom. My former fellowship will be all over this, being a Church of England denomination. 

 

I never did join in with their love of Royalty and for the sake of the bond of peace, I remained silent whenever anything celebrating royalty was concerned.

 

Christ is my headship, not any man or woman. I never understood 'God save the Queen' when the Bible is clear that God is no respecter of persons. Just as they had a blind spot to 'Covid', they had a blind spot to the monarchy.

 

Around 178,000 people have died in the last 24 hours across the world. 

[Macnamara]

12 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

I referred to it being the end of an era a couple of posts before him too, so even those of us who are anti royal feel something. But it's partly trepidation at what's in store in the next act of this bizarre theatre.

 

yes.....i think those dancing on lizzies grave are not really seeing the whole picture

 

the great reset is upon us and this feels like one more step along the way. Some people wonder why people are upset when they have never met her and i suggest it is that it is because she symbolises something for them which is to say british sovereignty

 

I think its ok to want positive change whilst at the same understanding that not all change is good

 

When i say that it is the end of an era i'm not lamenting the passing of liz. I'm saying that from here on out we are going to be on a rollercoaster ride towards the UN's sustainability goals which they want achieved by 2030. Its going to be the end of a way of life, an end to many freedoms we have enjoyed, an end to privacy, an end to feeling a part of a wider society.

 

In its place we will be forced to be global 'citizens' that will have no choice but to comply or be starved out of the digital system: 'take your covid 'vaccine' or you won't get your digital handout from the state'. I know which of those eras i would choose to live in.

Edited September 9, 2022 by Macnamara

[jack121]

17 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

She didn't look well on Tuesday. Look at her blue or purple hands and how skinny she is.

 

 

 

 

 

I'd still shag her. After all these years she's still got those wicked blowjob lips. Practise makes perfect.

Push away all those old cobwebs and that musty smell from that wrinkly pussy, and think about all the lovely lolly in her massive will she's going to leave you.

Get fucked.

 

[legion]

The Queen's son Andrew's friend relaxes at a lodge owned by the Queen

The 'Web' is large and extensive. 

Vile and sinister 

 

 

[Saved]

7 hours ago, webtrekker said:

Also, I wonder whether that reflection in the glass front of the mantel clock is real, or Photoshopped in to obscure the time ...

 

 

 

I can't make out the time on Truss's wristwatch.

 

 

 

6.30pm?

 

 

[Talorgan]

 

59 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

yes.....i think those dancing on lizzies grave are not really seeing the whole picture

 

the great reset is upon us and this feels like one more step along the way. Some people wonder why people are upset when they have never met her and i suggest it is that it is because she symbolises something for them which is to say british sovereignty

 

I think its ok to want positive change whilst at the same understanding that not all change is good

 

When i say that it is the end of an era i'm not lamenting the passing of liz. I'm saying that from here on out we are going to be on a rollercoaster ride towards the UN's sustainability goals which they want achieved by 2030. Its going to be the end of a way of life, an end to many freedoms we have enjoyed, an end to privacy, an end to feeling a part of a wider society.

 

In its place we will be forced to be global 'citizens' that will have no choice but to comply or be starved out of the digital system: 'take your covid 'vaccine' or you won't get your digital handout from the state'. I know which of those eras i would choose to live in.

Perhaps it would all been Great Reset regardless of Monarch until people realise they are each a part of  the real  decision  making but also avoid being manipulated again perhaps go back to elected leader  rather than bloodlines ,plus that can be voted out it  as was in past sometimes  ( Not by digital voting machines though)

Edited September 9, 2022 by Talorgan

[Macnamara]

8 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Based Hebrew.

 

the destabilisation of society will deepen and widen as they bring us to a fever pitch of crisis and then out of the ashes of that sabotaged world they will offer their solution: membership of a new global technocracy. The price to pay? The loss of everything you hold dear.

 

There will be more random stabbings, shootings, sucker punchings, rapes, thefts and all the rest until the spirit of the people is utterly broken

 

People can mock the symbols of british sovereignty but what is it that they are putting forward to replace it? I have tried to discuss ideas around the common law and constitution but otherwise what exactly are the things going to be that bind this society together moving forward?

 

Most people don't think on this level. They see only what is immediately in front of them. What i read in some peoples comments is unthinking nihilism

 

The disintegration or rather the controlled demolition of british society is deepening and the howling mob is so blind in its rage that it is playing right into the hands of the global corporate elites, who are all of the same bloodlines as the royal family so don't kid yourselves that the technocracy represents some sort of liberation from patriarchal british monarchy!.....its just a new deeper expression of complete control by the same old power players which is why the soon to be king charles is right in there making all the right WEF and UN talking points

 

People are so blind

Edited September 9, 2022 by Macnamara

[sickofallthebollocks]

[alexa]

13 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

When i say that it is the end of an era i'm not lamenting the passing of liz. I'm saying that from here on out we are going to be on a rollercoaster ride towards the UN's sustainability goals which they want achieved by 2030. Its going to be the end of a way of life, an end to many freedoms we have enjoyed, an end to privacy, an end to feeling a part of a wider society.

 

Exactly, an end to cash is something to watch out for blaming it on the cost of the reprinting of money. 

[Macnamara]

29 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 the howling mob is so blind in its rage that it is playing right into the hands of the global corporate elites

 

i saw this tweet by a critical race professor which is a perfect example of what i'm talking about. We have a joke in this country: ''what did the romans ever do for us?'' because we were conquered and enslaved by the romans. They took white british people and sold them into slavery around the roman empire. They brought road engineering to britain and under floor heating and sewer systems and they brought greater global links.

 

This has forced us as a people to consider such things in a more nuanced way. So i have a few issues with these tweets. First of all i don't think it was a 'british' empire. Not when you look at who the people were who held and controlled much of the wealth. I would call it a freemasonic empire and i think it stretched far beyond british shores.

 

Secondly i think that freemasonic empire kept average british people under its control as much as it did people from other countries and thirdly i would say that if we say we want to reject these things then what alternatives are we speaking about? For example if you are lamenting their arrival in africa are you suggesting that you go back to the state before they arrived? If so then are you going to go to africa and live in an adobe hut with a straw roof? No i don't think you will as i think that actually you DO want to be part of the modern world.

 

So before we go blindly trashing the past perhaps we just step back and ask ourselves what is it that we actually want? I personally think that we should take a more nuanced view and look to combine the best of the past with the best of the present whilst losing what doesn't work for us. The WEF elites have their vision for the future and all this pain and brutality of the past that our ancestors went through is all leading upto this point. The technocracy of the WEF represents a totalitarian endgame and if we fall into that trap then is the suffering of our ancestors not all for nothing? Did we learn nothing?

Twitter pulls vile tweet by Carnegie Mellon's critical race theory professor who said she hoped Queen died 'an excruciating death' - after Jeff Bezos led avalanche of condemnation

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11194501/Jeff-Bezos-slams-Carnegie-Mellon-professor-vile-tweet-ailing-Queen.html

Edited September 9, 2022 by Macnamara

[Macnamara]

16 minutes ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

 

i was told a story once about someone who was pals with the queens ghillie on balmoral. Apparently....and this is many decades ago....all involved parties are long since dead....this person gave the royal ghillie a bottle of whisky in return for pairing his dog with her majesties dog which then produced puppies...

 

So somewhere out there is a secret royal lineage of dogs

Edited September 9, 2022 by Macnamara

[Morpheus]

[Talorgan]

9 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

i saw this tweet by a critical race professor which is a perfect example of what i'm talking about. We have a joke in this country: ;;what did the romans ever do for us?'' because we were conquered and enslaved by the romans. They took white british people and sold them into slavery around the roman empire. They brought road engineering to britain and under floor heating and sewer systems and they brought greater global links.

 

This has forced us as a people to consider such things in a more nuanced way. So i have a few issues with these tweets. First of all i don't think it was a 'british' empire. Not when you look at who the people were who held and controlled much of the wealth. I would call it a freemasonic empire and i think it stretched far beyond british shores.

 

Secondly i think that freemasonic empire kept average british people under its control as much as it did people from other countries and thirdly i would say that if we say we want to reject these things then what alternatives are we speaking about? For example if you are lamenting their arrival in africa are you suggesting that you go back to the state before they arrived? If so then are you going to go to africa and live in an adobe hut with a straw roof? No i don't think you will as i think that actually you DO want to be part of the modern world.

 

So before we go blindly trashing the past perhaps we just step back and ask ourselves what is it that we actually want? I personally think that we should take a more nuanced view and look to combine the best of the past with the best of the present whilst losing what doesn't work for us. The WEF elites have their vision for the future and all this pain and brutality of the past that our ancestors went through is all leading upto this point. The technocracy of the WEF represents a totalitarian endgame and if we fall into that trap then is the suffering of our ancestors not all for nothing?

Twitter pulls vile tweet by Carnegie Mellon's critical race theory professor who said she hoped Queen died 'an excruciating death' - after Jeff Bezos led avalanche of condemnation

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11194501/Jeff-Bezos-slams-Carnegie-Mellon-professor-vile-tweet-ailing-Queen.html

I agree it seems this system and control been going on very long time and to change it is tricky when that can be manipulated again and again so an archaic revival been pushed before .

Needs new way at looking at very old problem 

[HAARPING_On]

13 hours ago, Greenhulk50 said:

I bet this photo was taken weeks ago . Note the pink watch to draw attention.

 

 

I’m suggesting this photo wasn’t taken at all. Just Liz Truss on a green backdrop.

 

A number of things I’d question here.

• The clock and the “reflection” which blocks out the time.
• The handshake from the Queen looks “Masonic” and doesn’t appear to Match Liz Truss’s hand gesture. (try the hand position from Truss yourself – it’s awkward)
• I know the Queen has had mobility problems but who carries a walking stick and a handbag in their own house? Surely a handbag would add to any balance issues?
• Liz Truss looks way bigger than the Queen. Camera angle? Distortion?

 

Would welcome any counterpoints or debate but just my thoughts for what they are worth...

 

[Macnamara]

7 minutes ago, Talorgan said:

I agree it seems this system and control been going on very long time and to change it is tricky when that can be manipulated again and again so an archaic revival been pushed before .

Needs new way at looking at very old problem 

 

instead what we have is 'social justice warriors' being handed down very simplistic views of history so that they will cheerlead this rush into the great reset

 

but the great reset is really just the great enslavement and the people behind it are the same old bloodlines that have been running things since colonialism and before

 

they are being duped into a trap. Now that's not to say that i think that how things are now is good. I think there are terrible problems with how things are now! I also want change and justice and wider prosperity for humanity but i don't think that the satanic pedophile elites behind the great reset want anything good for any of us be you black, white, brown, yellow or whatever

 

But the woke mob won't listen....they will not listen to reason. They are in a kind of intoxication or spell

Edited September 9, 2022 by Macnamara

[Macnamara]

1 minute ago, HAARPING_On said:

Would welcome any counterpoints or debate but just my thoughts for what they are worth...

 

if you look at the queens eyes they are not looking at either lizz truss's hand which her own hand would be aiming for nor is she looking the person whose hand she is shaking in the eye which is the custom.

 

her eyes are looking right through truss....which is strange

[HAARPING_On]

1 minute ago, Macnamara said:

 

if you look at the queens eyes they are not looking at either lizz truss's hand which her own hand would be aiming for nor is she looking the person whose hand she is shaking in the eye which is the custom.

 

her eyes are looking right through truss....which is strange

 

I did notice that too but forgot to bullet point it.

Well spotted.

You'd think she'd be looking at Liz Truss as she shook her hand wouldn't you? The posture and the gaze suggests she is greeting someone smaller than her.

[Shake]

2 hours ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

 

 

Well it's a free country and we have freedom of speech. The Police were doing their job, the flag shagging pseudo patriots were in the wrong if things turned nasty.

The same mob that are probably triple jabbed with the Satan juice

[Truthblast]

58 minutes ago, Saved said:

6.30pm?

 

 

 

6 x 3 = 6 + 6 + 6

[alexa]

12 minutes ago, HAARPING_On said:

 

I’m suggesting this photo wasn’t taken at all. Just Liz Truss on a green backdrop.

 

A number of things I’d question here.

• The clock and the “reflection” which blocks out the time.
• The handshake from the Queen looks “Masonic” and doesn’t appear to Match Liz Truss’s hand gesture. (try the hand position from Truss yourself – it’s awkward)
• I know the Queen has had mobility problems but who carries a walking stick and a handbag in their own house? Surely a handbag would add to any balance issues?
• Liz Truss looks way bigger than the Queen. Camera angle? Distortion?

 

Would welcome any counterpoints or debate but just my thoughts for what they are worth...

 

 

The image is definitely green screened, Liz Truss looks huge compared to Queeny & the hand shake doesn't quite match off either also if Truss was to sit on the sofa the side of her she wouldn't fit. 

[HAARPING_On]

Having had time to think about the news and digest it a little I’ve had a number of thoughts in my head since yesterday evening...

 

The timing of the death announcement seems “important.” Most people will see it as 08/09/2022 but the announcement would have arrived in the eastern Commonwealth countries on 09/09/2022... Is this significant?

 

Now, I may be wrong here but I’m pretty sure the “announcement” came at 6.33pm or 18.33hrs in the UK as the news bulletin was just about to finish on the radio and was interrupted with breaking news... I made a note of the time when it happened, that’s when I heard it, that was my observation. Very convenient numerology.

 

The announcement also comes very close to the harvest moon which I'm not well up on but I’m sure some people may be able to add further information as to the relevance or significance...

 

In astrology, mercury retrogrades from 9^th September to 2^nd October, not sure which sign it tracks back into but again this may have some significance..

 

As I’ve said previously on here, I’ve been of the opinion the Queen has  been dead for some time so the announcement didn’t come as any great surprise to me and I certainly didn’t feel any emotion about it, all I could think of was the “the timing.”

 

Two other things have been pecking my head since last night too...

 

The first is protocol. There is a very strict protocol to be followed when a royal death occurs, everything from the funeral to the coronation of the new monarch. We need to watch this closely as things may not be done “correctly” effectively rendering them illegitimate.

 

Brian Gerrish from the UK Column touched on this some time back on the opening of parliament where the Queen did not wear her crown and the jewels were placed on a stand next to the Monarch.

 

The other thing we need to keep an eye on is bills or legislation slipping through Parliament while everyone is “in mourning.” I wouldn’t put it past this bunch of treacherous rats in Westminster to try and rush through as much legislation as possible while people are distracted. This needs to be watched very closely.

 

We live in uncertain times, and I’m pretty sure we are heading into unchartered waters, certainly with Charlie on the throne and all his WEF connections... only time will tell.

[Golden Retriever]

Indeed the Rainbow is very much an occult symbol

 

 

Edited September 9, 2022 by Golden Retriever

[CarpeDiem]

1 hour ago, HAARPING_On said:

 

I’m suggesting this photo wasn’t taken at all. Just Liz Truss on a green backdrop.

 

A number of things I’d question here.

• The clock and the “reflection” which blocks out the time.
• The handshake from the Queen looks “Masonic” and doesn’t appear to Match Liz Truss’s hand gesture. (try the hand position from Truss yourself – it’s awkward)
• I know the Queen has had mobility problems but who carries a walking stick and a handbag in their own house? Surely a handbag would add to any balance issues?
• Liz Truss looks way bigger than the Queen. Camera angle? Distortion?

 

Would welcome any counterpoints or debate but just my thoughts for what they are worth...

 

Shadows look wrong. Look at Truss' leg shadows (or are they scuffed up carpet where somone previously walked) very faint but going away from big window as seen in reflection in mirror (as they should) but look at Liz's, her shadows go to her right and hardly cast out at all? Maybe just me but they do not seem in tandem with each other in the same room/light? Just noticed walking stick shadow too. Going towards big window allowing light in! Would lamp/mirror on mantle do that and push shadow back towards the amount of light from window? certainly a mish mash.

 

The shadows really do have me confused. Did the photographer use lighting? if so why are shadows not all going same direction? That big window at back plus photography lighting from same direction surely would overpower any light from behind or above? I'm no photo expert but I have to say when I saw the pic on day of release I did actually ask a few people if it was real.

Edited September 9, 2022 by CarpeDiem
Addition

[wolfpavek1]

1 hour ago, HAARPING_On said:

 

I’m suggesting this photo wasn’t taken at all. Just Liz Truss on a green backdrop.

 

A number of things I’d question here.

• The clock and the “reflection” which blocks out the time.
• The handshake from the Queen looks “Masonic” and doesn’t appear to Match Liz Truss’s hand gesture. (try the hand position from Truss yourself – it’s awkward)
• I know the Queen has had mobility problems but who carries a walking stick and a handbag in their own house? Surely a handbag would add to any balance issues?
• Liz Truss looks way bigger than the Queen. Camera angle? Distortion?

 

Would welcome any counterpoints or debate but just my thoughts for what they are worth...

 

The watch says 3pm on the dot 15minites exactly watch the queen Helen mirren  for insight more than sufficient time 

1515 over times up fires on back to my morphine coma.

 

15 presidents 15primeminsitets 1515  aginvourt Anne of cleves Henry the 8th.

 

Meanwhile nobheads miss their positions gangstalking those already awake for a free bottle of Gordon's gin .

 

Bored now pudsey get your case we are leaving