rebornsteve Posted September 14, 2022 Share Posted September 14, 2022 I’ve been doing a LOT of research into common law stuff, listened to hours of podcasts, and, ultimately I believe the best place for the truth is https://peacekeepers.org.uk I’m halfway through the Peace Keepers free course. in summary it’s about making clear the law, common law yes, but focussing on common law is not what is important. this is about understanding the law and how it applies to the sovereign individual and our relationships to governments, police etc. If anyone is genuinely interested I will write more as I learn, this will be a good motivation for me to learn to, so please let me know! oh, and there is not a big pot of money that we can all access for free!! ‘knowledge is not power, utilising knowledge is wisdom.’ Steve x 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TetraG Posted September 15, 2022 Share Posted September 15, 2022 (edited) 6 hours ago, rebornsteve said: oh, and there is not a big pot of money that we can all access for free!! ok, no problem I think?... Can we still eat and stay alive? or stay alive and not eat, all w/o money? and still not have to EAT MONEY either way? ~~~~~ Greetings Steve, thanks for bringing this to attention and for offering to help get us to where we need to be in terms of understanding how laws (of various kinds) can be made to work for us ALL. Below I won't try to pretend I know the language of the law.... Just speak as I find basicly... 6 hours ago, rebornsteve said: ‘knowledge is not power, utilising knowledge is wisdom.’ Grand.... and so I had a bit of a dice and slice through at PeaceKeepers.org.uk ... Here's what my brain understood of it... which to be fair is all quite clear, (the website, not my brain)... so okay I'm mildly having fun with it at the same time... Here goes my little analysis, anyone can take or leave it, you may still not be sure whether you are coming or going, but hopefully I am better expressed than that self depreciation quip at my own expense, lol... However to remain reasonably focused where my gaze meets the page on their quite distinct introductory unveiling and general instruction on ideas (before even needing to take the course), I note already my brain votes in recognition of what SEEM (for all I know) like a few commonly master strokes of commonality (err natural laws??) and beyond??? Well, with what layed before us anyway, I am curious to find out how EQUITY of this natural law sort of idea as I suppose it is partly to do with, ~is?~ better somehow than commonlaw as it already was or is or was or is or was, (*and just how it is different or likenable but improved or whatever*).... Remember I know not a lot about any of it. How it MIGHT BE applicable old or borrowed laws can still hold relative power for the average citizen TODAY is the freaking exciting possibility here..... So basicly like any good website I guess we find a fair idea at the outset what exactly they are outlining or hoping to underpin with such MAGIC, (no, magic is wrong? Sorry) & no doubt further into it being told how it works more a do, at any given moment a person goes and happily gets on it and at once takes the course such as it is in free to access availability and when digested in terms of knowledge and practicability of that knowledge etc... Sure it all seems pretty cordial stuff (or BRAIN FRIENDLY, haha) like the offer seems at the outset (and would seem genuine) and not that difficult to take on board the basics- (NO I haven't signed up to course YET) .... but I can be happy enough for now in the curiousity that warranted me to want visiting their site is with full open mindedness on my part at least.... where on the whole it appears valid (seeking of knowledge and knowledge bestowed).... (and maybe even justified my mediocre but quality driven narrative here) in supplementing what I don't know with MORE I don't knows.... HAHAHA.... But seriously, by first impressions what meets the eye may provide well equipped TODAY by this approach (well does it?) ~by use of a framework based presumably on mostly old laws and to be utilizing its' knowledge~ applicable in ways where the law, may otherwise have led us astray or deceived us??? Who knows I am noooooooooooooooooooooooot an expert ..... Enyway...... All I can do is give my impression and say it may ring true in accordance with it's claims and methodology and help objectivise to bring nearer to resolution all human wranglings and settlements hopefully.... If that's not too much to hope for?? So I guess on the face of it, they may have some good points of how to apply variance in law-application?? and accountability on some scale. dependent on how strong and effective a law challenged with equitability may resolve (or be forced into evolving into a more people friendly law) etc... And where we are subject to tyrants, remembering to apply it on them too might be the triumph of peace but fairness too as this website appears to exist in order to achieve by those means and objectives (such as read in equity*/ mission*/ portions of the website).... IN ESSENCE: PeaceKeepers does appear to exercise some quite well choreographed features of equity in the sense that if true by their strength vested in this , that by what I see it say supersedes common law, and demonstrates how that helps keep the peace better than common-law could, by the looks... hmmmmm. I don't know enough about common law, but on their website where they say like how equity I took to be by their exposition is in some way granted to "people" when the word equity is used;;; (the essence of a person in how one makes a case or applies this stuff I guess, as in not just soley about his or her material stock or owner claims, gains and playoffs but that of course depends on what one is PEACEABLY fighting for), and quite so, not just pertaining to property as we tend to know or knew EQUITY....So then we all wakeup and remember, ah yes I am a human being to be considered and so too I shall consider my equitable rites, in equitable value tendering those rites, and watching where necessary along the way ensuring each case for humanity or an individual is not compromised (marred by nay-do-wells not intent on equity), is that how it goes I wonder in some part???? ..... or anyway who would otherwise come to argue mis-merits with illicit motives and where such individuals of ruinous mind could ruin the intention of equitable rites by making false or fraudulent claims but that happens no matter what law being applied I suppose. (the latter comment is where you get criminals hoping to get best treatment I guess just like they get in prison. Nice LCD big screen TV - is that the clincher for them in jail and such where the law digresses and wanes, but anyway just to name one instance...) I mean even if that's not understood by my take, I saw that MUTUAL HONOR in striking an accord in law (of whatever weight or equity) plays a big role in this person-respecting equity stuff at the get-go, and what was once known, as ""House of Chancery Laws"" appears now to have been moderately(?) updated a little and with a new name or something like that. Not sure I read everything correct but there we go. That's my take so far. Edited September 15, 2022 by TetraG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zArk Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 On 9/15/2022 at 1:17 AM, TetraG said: .So then we all wakeup and remember, ah yes I am a human being to be considered and so too I shall consider my equitable rites, when using terms and words it is quite important to realise that the legal world has its own language human being is a hu -- man colour of Man not Man. If you claim to be colour of Man, you are in their world. They will claim you as their subject. It maybe an unintentional slip of your tongue but these guys dont see it like that. Your word is your bond. Getting out of a slip is like sticky the stick insect getting stuck on a sticky bun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TetraG Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 8 hours ago, zArk said: when using terms and words it is quite important to realise that the legal world has its own language human being is a hu -- man colour of Man not Man. If you claim to be colour of Man, you are in their world. They will claim you as their subject. It maybe an unintentional slip of your tongue but these guys dont see it like that. Your word is your bond. Getting out of a slip is like sticky the stick insect getting stuck on a sticky bun. Hi, certainly I can see how possibly your 2 points marry up, but legal language as a rule doesn't interest me too much. But I am glad you said what you said anyway. I just think in our sovereignty of SELF, at bare minimum, we ourselves don't have to forget we are human beings.... So no it was no slip of the tongue on my part.. Just I was speaking the way I might normally speak. By the way, where does this leave Gary Nu-Man human, hehe. J/K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.