United Free Republics of Britannia

Ethel · November 5, 2022

I would like to apologize for the rant I posted here last night about those who want a republic. I am sorry. Using laughing face emoji to try and soften the blow of verbally annihilating people for their beliefs is inexcusable.

I don't know why I often feel compelled to say things which cause people to form a negative perception of me, but I can assure you it isn't a deliberate attempt to hurt people. It's more likely self-sabotage, but I don't know.

Either way, I apologize for any and all hurt or offense caused.

I think I will take a break from the forum now, maybe permanently.

Campion · November 5, 2022

@Ethel well I've no great preference between constitutional monarchy and a republic so I'm not offended but at least it's good to see your passion for this stuff and I hope you decide to stay in the forum.

I don't know enough about anarchy to give a good reply apart from the usual what-if scenarios. Whether we keep the monarchy or go for a republic, I'd advocate sovereignty for the British nations and either dissolving the union or relegating it to a subordinate status. Then let the nations decide their destiny themselves. We need more decentralisation and local powers at least, even if I'm not ready for full-on anarchism yet .

sock muppet · November 5, 2022

16 hours ago, Ethel said:

Dream on, dreamer. The scenario you envision isn't true freedom. Not even close.

A republic is for people who don't have the balls for an anarchist setup. Children. Weak, whiny children who want Mommy and Daddy state to wipe their snotty little noses.

In a republic, as I understand it, there are still elected representatives, i.e. "leaders" whom are chosen by the people. By the masses. Democracy, in other words.

In what way is that an improvement on the retarded, insane pantomime we already have?

You don't put a vote in the hands of idiot children, i.e. most people. When someone's head is still well and truly up their backside, giving them a vote is like giving a chainsaw to a three-year-old.

In an anarchist society there would be people who would use the lack of leaders, police, army and law as an opportunity to do harm. (THIS ALREADY HAPPENS) What percentage of humanity that constitutes I don't know. My answer to that is: bring it on. I'll take my fucking chances.

It's called being a grown-up.

There are too many people on this forum trying to herd people into clinging to the political system we already have, or something close to it. It's an effort to steer narratives. I see it, I see what people are doing.

People need to man the fuck up, grow the fuck up and stop clinging to something which has literally never served us. It's retarded and it's also selfish. People like myself who are grown up enough to envisage a society without monarchy or government shouldn't have to live our lives being dragged into other people's co-dependency because people are choosing to be pussies.

Man up!

Welcome welcome welcome, you unpleasant peasant, , now get over yourself because you aint that special, and in a free Republic free speech is not only the Law via a Constitution but also a requirement, so fuk you,

16 hours ago, Ethel said:

A republic is for people who don't have the balls for an anarchist setup. Children. Weak, whiny children who want Mommy and Daddy state to wipe their snotty little noses.

In actual fact people live in a self governing way already, but the current set up is always trying to convince you that the opposite is true, how many times have you gone to the supermarket and paid the cashier with bullets, i for one can not recall a single time that has happened, although through the snoooz service and grape vine we know it does happen, but the God awful truth is, it's rare, if this was not the case then it would not be anarchy that breaks out but hysteria and pandemonium, so it holds true that 99% of the people are self governing, Law abiding and are mindful of the rights bestowed upon every other person, even if those requirements are not specifically written as Law, so in essence we practice anarchy and self governance all the time.

16 hours ago, Ethel said:

In a republic, as I understand it, there are still elected representatives, i.e. "leaders" whom are chosen by the people. By the masses. Democracy, in other words.

Correct, you still have Democracy within a Republic as the Constitution provides the first writing of Law and restraint on said authority that is elected to govern within the bounds of rights and restrictions, there will always be the need for debate as time goes on where new circumstances present themselves and the representatives are there to enact accordingly to both the Constitution and the will of the people.

17 hours ago, Ethel said:

People need to man the fuck up, grow the fuck up and stop clinging to something which has literally never served us

I am in complete agreement,

sock muppet · November 5, 2022

4 hours ago, Ethel said:

I would like to apologize for the rant I posted here last night about those who want a republic. I am sorry. Using laughing face emoji to try and soften the blow of verbally annihilating people for their beliefs is inexcusable.

I don't know why I often feel compelled to say things which cause people to form a negative perception of me, but I can assure you it isn't a deliberate attempt to hurt people. It's more likely self-sabotage, but I don't know.

Either way, I apologize for any and all hurt or offense caused.

I think I will take a break from the forum now, maybe permanently.

Oi you, i aint letting you slip away, how did you put it, oh yes, man the fuk up and git yer arse back here,

Macnamara · November 5, 2022

8 hours ago, Ethel said:

I think I will take a break from the forum now, maybe permanently.

why? because you spoke your mind? I don't think that's a good reason to quit

TetraG · November 5, 2022

I've been staring at this thread a bit and with the mention of "pussies" (on page1) it took me a fair while to draw a correlation between that and Ethels sublimely cute avatar! .... (this was mainly b/c I was gawping at page2 just b/c that's where latest is & scant was my attention as I was doing other things like eating for most of the time, ).

More Power to Pussies..... Or wherever we are with this!..... Cheers!

sock muppet · November 6, 2022

On 11/5/2022 at 12:42 PM, Campion said:

I'd advocate sovereignty for the British nations and either dissolving the union or relegating it to a subordinate status. Then let the nations decide their destiny themselves. We need more decentralisation and local powers at least, even if I'm not ready for full-on anarchism yet

I agree with this, this is what i would imagine the new Republics to be, the major countries of Ireland, Wales, Scotland and of course England all would be autonomous regions and boundaries respected but would come under the banner of free republics united in our common cause that both respects the culture and customs of each region, our laws are not so different and we all enjoy our freedoms as individuals, and in fact we are not so far from this realisation with respect to the common wealth that exists already, essentially we just need to retire the Monarchy system say thanks very much and there's a cheque in the post for your efforts and turn it into a museum, to remind ourselves of what unbridled tyranny has given us throughout history, any thoughts?

Edited November 6, 2022 by sock muppet
spelling

Campion · November 7, 2022

On 11/6/2022 at 1:37 PM, sock muppet said:

I agree with this, this is what i would imagine the new Republics to be, the major countries of Ireland, Wales, Scotland and of course England all would be autonomous regions and boundaries respected but would come under the banner of free republics united in our common cause that both respects the culture and customs of each region, our laws are not so different and we all enjoy our freedoms as individuals, and in fact we are not so far from this realisation with respect to the common wealth that exists already, essentially we just need to retire the Monarchy system say thanks very much and there's a cheque in the post for your efforts and turn it into a museum, to remind ourselves of what unbridled tyranny has given us throughout history, any thoughts?

It's a great vision but I think there's a lot more to it than just retiring the monarchy. At the moment the UK and especially England is completely controlled by the globalist cryptocracy who will fight tooth and nail to stop us having independence and freedom. We were after all the first victim of the British Empire and the monarchy is just the tip of the iceberg in the scale of the challenge we're facing. I'm not sure which commonwealth you're referring to - what goes by that name is basically the remnant of the British Empire which doesn't affect us ordinary people very much.

sock muppet · November 8, 2022

20 hours ago, Campion said:

It's a great vision but I think there's a lot more to it than just retiring the monarchy. At the moment the UK and especially England is completely controlled by the globalist cryptocracy who will fight tooth and nail to stop us having independence and freedom. We were after all the first victim of the British Empire and the monarchy is just the tip of the iceberg in the scale of the challenge we're facing. I'm not sure which commonwealth you're referring to - what goes by that name is basically the remnant of the British Empire which doesn't affect us ordinary people very much.

Nothing new under Sun, Tony Robinson takes us back through time, Wat Tyler and the peasants revolt, and i am a filthy peasant,

Quote: 'The Peasants' Revolt began in May 1381, triggered by a recently imposed poll tax of 4 pence from every adult, whether peasant or wealthy. The revolt was not only about money, as the peasants also sought increased liberty and other social reforms'.

Sound familiar, synchronicity is in full swing and nothing can stop it, get off yer arse ya filthy peasants there's revolting to be getting on with, and it's the government that stinks.

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/redpillworld/

WELL WORTH THE WATCH - 1381 Peasants Revolt

https://www.bitchute.com/video/wkNMQIt0eBr5/

Ethel · November 14, 2022

On 11/4/2022 at 9:30 PM, Ethel said:

Dream on, dreamer. The scenario you envision isn't true freedom. Not even close.

A republic is for people who don't have the balls for an anarchist setup. Children. Weak, whiny children who want Mommy and Daddy state to wipe their snotty little noses.

In a republic, as I understand it, there are still elected representatives, i.e. "leaders" whom are chosen by the people. By the masses. Democracy, in other words.

In what way is that an improvement on the retarded, insane pantomime we already have?

You don't put a vote in the hands of idiot children, i.e. most people. When someone's head is still well and truly up their backside, giving them a vote is like giving a chainsaw to a three-year-old.

In an anarchist society there would be people who would use the lack of leaders, police, army and law as an opportunity to do harm. (THIS ALREADY HAPPENS) What percentage of humanity that constitutes I don't know. My answer to that is: bring it on. I'll take my fucking chances.

It's called being a grown-up.

There are too many people on this forum trying to herd people into clinging to the political system we already have, or something close to it. It's an effort to steer narratives. I see it, I see what people are doing.

People need to man the fuck up, grow the fuck up and stop clinging to something which has literally never served us. It's retarded and it's also selfish. People like myself who are grown up enough to envisage a society without monarchy or government shouldn't have to live our lives being dragged into other people's co-dependency because people are choosing to be pussies.

Man up!

On 11/5/2022 at 9:46 AM, Ethel said:

I would like to apologize for the rant I posted here last night about those who want a republic. I am sorry. Using laughing face emoji to try and soften the blow of verbally annihilating people for their beliefs is inexcusable.

I don't know why I often feel compelled to say things which cause people to form a negative perception of me, but I can assure you it isn't a deliberate attempt to hurt people. It's more likely self-sabotage, but I don't know.

Either way, I apologize for any and all hurt or offense caused.

I think I will take a break from the forum now, maybe permanently.

I considered not addressing this again, and then I thought, actually, why shouldn't I? If I have some perspective on the matter which I am certain is accurate then why should I not convey it? Even though I am bitterly disappointed by this, I am going to try and remain calm.

These are multiples/alters. They are the result of a moderate level of multiple personalities.

Although I maintain that virtually everyone has multiple personalities, and could, if I chose to, back that statement up to the point of creating an entire thread on the matter, I won't, for the time being. Consider this, however: are you the same person with your grandparents as you are with your mates down the pub? No, of course you aren't. These are different "selves", a normal everyday level of multiple personalities less pronounced than what you would see in "Split" starring James McAvoy.

The first alter, or part, as I often call them, is a "protector" part (I call him Hector) which is triggered in situations where I feel "bad". In this instance, being in a minority of one; the only anarchist, seemingly, on a forum of people whom support either a republican or democratic society. This part's response to that was to attack, since, to protector parts, attack is the best form of defense. When this part "occupied the seat of consciousness" and called people pussies etc, it was doing so to "feel better". It was an attempt to help me feel more powerful and/or good, in the face of feeling weak and bad. This is all shadow work. Shadow work is necessary to defeat the NWO, it means they have less to use against you.

However, almost immediately the other aspect of me, the one which apologizes for having different opinions, or being in the minority, or wording things harshly, blended with me. When I went to bed that night, I woke up three or four times consumed by guilt at the idea I had hurt people's feelings. This part has a strong conscience, but also apologizes even when it shouldn't. I have actually apologized to people in my life who unambiguously abused me. This part is the result of childhood abuse and being told how "bad" I was constantly. This part goes off at the deep end constantly. It overthinks. Although it is good to have a conscience, vacillating between two "parts" which are polar opposites and have opposite energies is exhausting and destabilizing. It is also sad. I am sad and disappointed that I often can't convey disagreement in a gentle way, or that I have an alter which grovels and apologizes even when it probably shouldn't. I notice also that it's very rare for people to reject my apologies, even when it's probably appropriate for them to do so. Was there anything I should have apologized for? Probably calling people "selfish" or "pussies" - not for advocating for anarchy over republicanism, which I still do.

Mentioning that I have multiples is not a shirking of responsibility either. From the moment a person knows this, they are responsible for all of their multiples and should not shirk responsibility because they were blended with one.

Edited November 14, 2022 by Ethel

JCP · November 15, 2022

1 hour ago, Ethel said:

I considered not addressing this again, and then I thought, actually, why shouldn't I? If I have some perspective on the matter which I am certain is accurate then why should I not convey it? Even though I am bitterly disappointed by this, I am going to try and remain calm.

These are multiples/alters. They are the result of a moderate level of multiple personalities.

Although I maintain that virtually everyone has multiple personalities, and could, if I chose to, back that statement up to the point of creating an entire thread on the matter, I won't, for the time being. Consider this, however: are you the same person with your grandparents as you are with your mates down the pub? No, of course you aren't. These are different "selves", a normal everyday level of multiple personalities less pronounced than what you would see in "Split" starring James McAvoy.

The first alter, or part, as I often call them, is a "protector" part (I call him Hector) which is triggered in situations where I feel "bad". In this instance, being in a minority of one; the only anarchist, seemingly, on a forum of people whom support either a republican or democratic society. This part's response to that was to attack, since, to protector parts, attack is the best form of defense. When this part "occupied the seat of consciousness" and called people pussies etc, it was doing so to "feel better". It was an attempt to help me feel more powerful and/or good, in the face of feeling weak and bad. This is all shadow work. Shadow work is necessary to defeat the NWO, it means they have less to use against you.

However, almost immediately the other aspect of me, the one which apologizes for having different opinions, or being in the minority, or wording things harshly, blended with me. When I went to bed that night, I woke up three or four times consumed by guilt at the idea I had hurt people's feelings. This part has a strong conscience, but also apologizes even when it shouldn't. I have actually apologized to people in my life who unambiguously abused me. This part is the result of childhood abuse and being told how "bad" I was constantly. This part goes off at the deep end constantly. It overthinks. Although it is good to have a conscience, vacillating between two "parts" which are polar opposites and have opposite energies is exhausting and destabilizing. It is also sad. I am sad and disappointed that I often can't convey disagreement in a gentle way, or that I have an alter which grovels and apologizes even when it probably shouldn't. I notice also that it's very rare for people to reject my apologies, even when it's probably appropriate for them to do so. Was there anything I should have apologized for? Probably calling people "selfish" or "pussies" - not for advocating for anarchy over republicanism, which I still do.

Mentioning that I have multiples is not a shirking of responsibility either. From the moment a person knows this, they are responsible for all of their multiples and should not shirk responsibility because they were blended with one.

Quote

"being in a minority of one; the only anarchist, seemingly, on a forum of people whom support either a republican or democratic society."

Don't assume that you're the only anarchist here; I advocate for an anarchical political system that uses a Resource Based Economic System.

** https://truthseeker.se/anarchy-vs-government-and-a-resource-based-economy/ **

IMHO, the first step is to let people know what Anarchy is and what it is not.

A few dictionary definitions of Anarchy:

- noun a state of society without government or law. political and social disorder due to the absence of governmental control

- anarchy noun as in chaos a state in which there is widespread wrongdoing and disregard for rules and authority

- politics & government a lack of organization and control in a society or group, esp. because either there is no government or it has no power: Civil war has led to anarchy.

What anarchy isn’t about:
Every man for himself
No rules
Chaos
Violence

What anarchy is about:
Equal rights
Rules based on natural law (Do no harm or cause another loss)
Order
Self-ownership
Responsibility

It's good to know where words are rooted to know their intrinsic meaning

528594758_AnarchyDef.jpg.f40eef755e59725e343b0ecc39647166.jpg

.......................... NO SLAVES !!!

Government literally means "To Control the Mind' ....................

1494887775_GovernmentDef.jpg.dafac4671ab6711a6d7a44dbb28113e9.jpg

What I don't believe in is the false dichotomy of Right vs Left

671952003_falsedichotomy.jpg.91eaed0285be63fd8e60521173cb12bd.jpg

webtrekker · November 15, 2022

I believe all people in positions of power and high responsibilty: MP's, Judges, Ministers, Doctors, Scientists, etc, should be given as much money as they want, luxury homes, planes, yachts, amazing holidays, servants to do their every bidding, ... in fact, a life beyond anyone's wildest dreams ...

With ONE caveat ...

If they FAIL in their duties they are publicly HANGED!

Is that not reasonable?

Edited November 15, 2022 by webtrekker
there/their typo

sock muppet · November 18, 2022

On 11/15/2022 at 3:07 PM, webtrekker said:

I believe all people in positions of power and high responsibilty: MP's, Judges, Ministers, Doctors, Scientists, etc, should be given as much money as they want, luxury homes, planes, yachts, amazing holidays, servants to do their every bidding, ... in fact, a life beyond anyone's wildest dreams ...

With ONE caveat ...

If they FAIL in their duties they are publicly HANGED!

Is that not reasonable?

It could work, but with all the wealth and influence that brings they would just pay for someone else to take their place,

I would just make that a stipulation in the oath of office they took, some thing like, 'blah blah blah..... and in accordance with duties set here fore henceforth.... and blah blah blah..... hitherto and in full compis mentis, if you fuk up we snap your neck in this noose in the Republic's court yard, but bring your own refreshments and snacks!'

sock muppet · November 21, 2022

Here's a link to a site dedicated to abolish the monarchy system and return Britannia to a Republic once more, there is the British Republican party, but the website is not working too well at the moment and limited in the information offered, personally i will be seeking more information from Republic.org.

https://www.republic.org.uk/

sock muppet · November 24, 2022

Hope you approve Rik where ever you are, you left us too soon, somehow this image just captures the mood and direction we need to be taking, RIP.

The government lied and people died
Science only spoke silence
they sold their souls
for the payroll
now they want amnesty
never be ashamed
to show your disdain
it is time for our
destiny

ufrb.jpg.890f474882e1ccb5e3c4e55beb775c4e.jpg