Jump to content

There Is Something VERY SPECIFIC Wrong With The Climate Change NARRATIVE - Where Is The DESIGN SOFTWARE To Counter It?


Truthblast

Recommended Posts

- Since around the year 2000, many governments and NGOs have been screaming "Climate Change! Climate Change! Its the end! Aaaaargh!"

 

- The CLEVEREST way to counter CC would have been to create a FREE DESIGN SOFTWARE which would allow ANYBODY interested to take a shot at designing their own virtual Solar Panels, Wind Turbines, River Turbines, Sea Wave Power Plants, Tide Power Plants and similar on a regular PC

 

- The software would been paid for by a coalition of governments, like the U.S. and EU governments

 

- You wouldn't actually BUILD this stuff for real, which is VERY expensive. You would design a virtual model of your idea in this SOFTWARE, and it would CALCULATE over a number of hours how EFFICIENT your Clean Energy Solution would be if it were actually built

 

- The physics SIMULATION techniques required to do this in software have been known for DECADES and are known by every university in the world interested in this kind of stuff

 

- You could have had GLOBAL CONTESTS where whoever manages to design the best clean energy solution wins a juicy money prize and gets their invention built

 

 

- 22 years later, NO such FREE design software is available to download, and commercial ENGINEERING SOFTWARE that CAN do this is JAW DROPPINGLY EXPENSIVE, affordable only to companies and universities with substantial financial resources

 

 

- If CLIMATE CHANGE was SOOO DANGEROUS, and SOOO URGENT, and SOOO CATASTROPHIC,why don't all of us have FREE DESIGN SOFTWARE on our PCs right now, which lets us dabble in things like turning wind into energy, or extracting energy from tides and sea waves, or turning photons into electricity in various ways?

 

 

- I believe that we won't EVER get that FREE software - not in 2030 or in 2040, unless the open source community decides to build something like it

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great idea! I'll get my mate Neil Ferguson on this right away. He's good at this sort of thing!

 

Sorry! Just taking the piss! Actually, you are quite right in what you say. Even if a lot of computing power was need for the simulations this could be done by distributed networks where everyon'e computer soves a small portion of the task in the background and then the results from all of these millions of small comuters are assembled into the final result. As in the  SETI@home project, remember that? Crowdsourced computing.

 

 

Edited by webtrekker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another extension to your idea is that, instead of having many people beavering away on individual projects, have  a panel to select one or two that look the most promising and get everyone to collaberate on these projects. Collaberation is dead easy these days as long as all players have access to the same software, which could be cloud-based.

 

What I'm saying here is that some folk are good with ideas, some are good at modelling, some are good at maths and physics, some are good at project management, etc.

Edited by webtrekker
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, webtrekker said:

Great idea! I'll get my mate Neil Ferguson on this right away. He's good at this sort of thing!

 

Sorry! Just taking the piss! Actually, you are quite right in what you say. Even if a lot of computing power was need for the simulations this could be done by distributed networks where everyon'e computer soves a small portion of the task in the background and then the results from all of these millions of small comuters are assembled into the final result. As in the  SETI@home project, remember that? Crowdsourced computing.

 

 

 

Precisely.

 

Hundreds of thousands of volunteer tinkerers could have taken a crack at designing a totally newly shaped wind turbine, or a novel way to generate electricity from sea waves and such, all just in a computer where it costs nothing.

 

If someone found something REALLY GOOD, it could have been PRODUCED FOR THE REAL WORLD.

 

There could have been prizes, and medals, and forums and chatrooms where people collab on this stuff.

 

But NOBODY provided a FREE or even MILDLY AFFORDABLE simulation software that lets you do this.

 

A mate of mine really wanted to get into this stuff 15 years ago.

 

The engineering simulation software he needed was SO UNBELIEVABLY EXPENSIVE that he would have had to SELL HIS HOUSE to be able to buy the 4 SOFTWARES he needed.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, webtrekker said:

Great idea! I'll get my mate Neil Ferguson on this right away. He's good at this sort of thing!

 

Sorry! Just taking the piss! Actually, you are quite right in what you say. Even if a lot of computing power was need for the simulations this could be done by distributed networks where everyon'e computer soves a small portion of the task in the background and then the results from all of these millions of small comuters are assembled into the final result. As in the  SETI@home project, remember that? Crowdsourced computing.

 

 

 

 

The result would have looked like this:

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In essence, we need the incredible power of a hive mind to develop something that our present 'scientists' and 'engineers' are incapable of due to biased knowledge and conflicts of interest (as well as the small threat of blackmail and murder that puts some of them off!).

 

No matter what walk of life you are from there's nothing to say thay YOU might not come up with the next big idea.

 

So-called 'experts' have had it too good for too long with their peer reviews and closed groups. Take Space as an example. It's so bad that astronomers won't attend the same seminars as physicists, or rocket scientists because all of these people are too far up their own arses and refuse to recognise that other fields are just as important as theirs. If they collaberated more they would make greater and faster discoveries to benefit us all.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, webtrekker said:

In essence, we need the incredible power of a hive mind to develop something that our present 'scientists' and 'engineers' are incapable of due to biased knowledge and conflicts of interest (as well as the small threat of blackmail and murder that puts some of them off!).

 

No matter what walk of life you are from there's nothing to say thay YOU might not come up with the next big idea.

 

So-called 'experts' have had it too good for too long with their peer reviews and closed groups. Take Space as an example. It's so bad that astronomers won't attend the same seminars as physicists, or rocket scientists because all of these people are too far up their own arses and refuse to recognise that other fields are just as important as theirs. If they collaberated more they would make greater and faster discoveries to benefit us all.

 

 

 

 

Also just statistical probability.

 

If 100,000 people try to create new windturbines, chances are that at least 10 will try a design so RADICAL that it leads somewhere completely new.

 

Science has become MIND NUMBINGLY DOGMATIC.

 

Its actually RISKY for someone in science to stick their neck out and PUT SOMETHING TOTALLY NEW FORWARD.

 

You may easily get treated like a CRANK or FANTASIST if your work flies in the face of accepted dogma.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Talorgan said:

And there are  ideas and various inventors whose ideas need airing like Victor Schauberger who worked with nature Implosion force of  living water rather than explosive

combustion engine etc 

 

The establishment hates real inventors.

 

Which is why education in STEM fields teaches as little creativity as possible.

Edited by Truthblast
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, and to be honest it doesn't matter whether you believe all the Climastrologers or not, having sources of power that don't plunder the Earth's natural resources can only be a good thing. (Err ... except for the Big Oil Barons, that is!).

 

As they say, 'There's no Planet B!'

 

 

 

Edited by webtrekker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny enough Victor Schauberger 1885;/1958 was  even employed by Hitler  who recognised his abilities  providing timber transport and even some flying device it seems.

Olaf Alexandersson wrote small book on his work .

But his implosive living water idea I think probably might be an answer ,or one answer to get away from explosion devices and would help environment .

Edited by Talorgan
+
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Talorgan said:

Funny enough Victor Schauberger 1885;/1958 was  even employed by Hitler  who recognised his abilities  providing timber transport and even some flying device it seems.

Olaf Alexandersson wrote small book on his work .

But his implosive living water idea I think probably might be an answer ,or one answer to get away from explosion devices and would help environment .

 

This quote from Shauberger says it all ...

 

“Unfortunately, catastrophes or scandalous disclosures always have to happen before humanity realises that it is only its own mistakes that have led it into misfortune. These are all the more difficult to rectify, because in the main they have been made by the authorities, who will not commit suicide themselves, but in order to save their own skins, they would rather that all Life should perish before they acknowledge their errors.”
Viktor Schauberger

 

Very prophetic!

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, webtrekker said:

I like this one ...

 

“How else should it be done then?", was always the immediate question. The answer is simple: "Exactly in the opposite way that it is done today!”
Viktor Schauberger
 
😀
 
 
 

 

Unfortunately, many good men and women who have tried exactly this in the modern world have ended up dead or otherwise destroyed.

 

The energy industry in particular immediately tries to kill any "inventor genius" working on this stuff and makes it look like suicide or a heart attack.

 

I have heard 2 different stories of energy inventors who were trying "change things" and suddenly died of SUICIDE.

 

Mainstream media never reports any foul play. Just "local inventor found dead in home of apparent suicide" or such.

 

Authorities never investigate. The big, bad energy industry is in play after all.

 

I also think the energy industry actually LIKES the widespread underground rumours of "inventors being killed".

 

It scares HUNDREDS of inventors away from doing anything energy related every year.

 

Many ask themselves "is saving the environment worth losing your life for?"

 

The answer for many is "No. Better stay clear of those homicidal maniacs and do something else."

 

I have NEVER seen ONE Mainstream Newspaper or other publication dig deeper into the death of an inventor.

 

Perhaps they also know that you BETTER NOT F@@@ with the world's most powerful industry...

 

Or perhaps they are OWNED by the energy industry, which has a lot of money to burn.

 

Edited by Truthblast
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Talorgan said:

I like to think these ideas might prevail in backwaters somewhere out of the way places

 

Unfortunately, you very quickly get electronically FLAGGED for accessing certain types of information even in the PHYSICAL world.

 

For example, there are THOUSANDS of print books and academic papers which, when you borrow them from a local library or university library, lead to your name being entered into a database.

 

Books about Nuclear Physics, Electromagnetics, certain types of Chemistry, Biological Toxins, Aircraft Design, Nikola Tesla's ideas, undesired Politics/History and similar may get you FLAGGED AUTOMATICALLY the second the librarian scans the barcode on the book.

 

Anything they consider "dangerous".

 

If you order ONLINE you'll get flagged - name, address and credit card number.

 

If you got to a large bookchain and pay in cash they may still flag you - when the cashier scans the "bad" barcode, the CCTV camera behind the cashier desk may send frames clearly showing your face to a database.

 

If you find a PDF or torrent online, they'll squeeze your identity out of your ISP or VPN provider.p

 

This is part of that blasted TIA initiative - TOTAL INFORMATION AWARENESS.

 

I also SUSPECT that the more you try to HIDE or KEEP A LOW PROFILE - you don't used social media or free email services, don't have a LinkedIn, you rarely use a credit card, you never put images of yourself on the web and so on - the MORE THE SYSTEM TRIES TO LOOK INTO YOU.

 

For example, there are 4 KNOWN private companies today which SEE THE ENTIRE GLOBAL INTERNET in realtime, including blogs and forums like this one or perhaps Max Igan's.

 

Its becoming EASIER AND EASIER for them to see who is researching or discussing what where.

 

MENACINGLY, all of the professional 3D DESIGN, ENGINEERING and CAD SOFTWARE now REQUIRES INTERNET CONNECTIVITY TO FUNCTION.

 

I am 100% CERTAIN that these softwares ILLEGALLY TRANSMIT YOUR CONFIDENTIAL DESIGNS TO THE INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATIONS.

 

Many young innovators are NAIVE about this stuff. They think they can Google "What is the highest performing wind turbine design in history" and NOT get flagged.

 

Even in the developing countries, once largely anonymous internet cafes increasingly have CCTV cameras, because they are so cheap now, or because the govt mandates it.

 

So unless you are in a really backward place in Africa or Asia, the net is tightening and tightening.

 

In my view, all this surveillance stuff is CRIMINAL and anybody who partakes in it is A CRIMINAL.

 

But that's the trend - they see more and more who works on what where.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What needs to be understood is that they don't want to cure climate change ........ they want to create it and fight anyone that can help counter it. That's their agenda; cause climate change, wait for us to react and claim they have the answers to fix it, and expect us fall for false solutions such as eating bugs,The Great Reset and to accept changes that we normally never would.

This is a perfect example of The Hegelian Dialectic, Order Out of Chaos, and David Icke's "Problem - Reaction - Solution."

 

This software will never be allowed unless it serves their agenda and gives them more control. Remove them from power and the answers will come.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JCP said:

What needs to be understood is that they don't want to cure climate change ........ they want to create it and fight anyone that can help counter it. That's their agenda; cause climate change, wait for us to react and claim they have the answers to fix it, and expect us fall for false solutions such as eating bugs,The Great Reset and to accept changes that we normally never would.

This is a perfect example of The Hegelian Dialectic, Order Out of Chaos, and David Icke's "Problem - Reaction - Solution."

 

This software will never be allowed unless it serves their agenda and gives them more control. Remove them from power and the answers will come.

 

 

IT GETS MUCH WORSE.

 

MILLIONS TO TENS OF MILLIONS OF AIR PARTICLES HAVE TO BE SIMULATED TO GET A FAIR PICTURE OF HOW EVEN A SMALL WIND TURBINE WITH A 1 METER DIAMETER ROTOR BEHAVES IN WIND.

 

GUESS WHAT THE 1 THING IS THAT NOBODY HAS EVER HARDWARE-ACCELERATED? PARTICLE BEHAVIOUR.

 

FOR THOSE WHO AREN'T TECHNICAL, YOU COULD DESIGN AFFORDABLE CUSTOM HARDWARE CHIPS WHICH ARE ONLY DESIGNED TO DO ONE THING REALLY WELL - CALCULATE THE BEHAVIOUR OF MILLIONS OF GAS OR FLUID PARTICLES AS FAST AS POSSIBLE.

 

WHEN NOBODY CREATES OR SELLS THESE CHIPS, THE CPU OR GPU IN YOUR PC HAS TO DO THESE CALCULATIONS INSTEAD.

 

RESULT? AN ACCURATE PARTICLE SIMULATION CALCULATES SLOW AS A STUCK PIG ON THESE PROCESSORS.

 

SO IF YOU WANTED TO SIMULATE ACCURATELY HOW A 50 METER DIAMETER VERSION OF YOUR "DREAM TURBINE" WOULD BEHAVE, YOU ARE LOOKING AT A SIMULATION WHICH MAY TAKE WEEKS TO CALCULATE ON EVEN A FAST PC OR MAC.

 

SAME PROBLEM IF YOU WANTED TO SIMULATE EXACTLY HOW A 20 METER LONG FLOATING STRUCTURE WHICH TURNS SEA WAVE MOVEMENT INTO ELECTRICITY BEHAVES IN SIMULATED ROUGH SEAS.

 

 

WHAT IF YOU DO A SIMPLER, FASTER SIMULATION?

 

 

YOUR DESIGN MAY BEHAVE COMPLETELY DIFFERENTLY IN THE REAL WORLD IF YOU DO THAT.

 

YOUR WIND TURBINE MAY HAVE SERIOUS PROBLEMS AT CERTAIN WIND SPEEDS OR ANGLES AND EVEN DAMAGE ITSELF CATASTROPHICALLY.

 

YOUR SEA WAVE MACHINE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO HANDLE REAL WAVES OF A CERTAIN SIZE, SPEED AND DIRECTION WELL AT ALL AND EXPERIENCE WEAR WHICH EVENTUALLY CAUSES IT TO FAIL OR GENERATE ONLY A POOR AMOUNT OF ENERGY.

 

 

NOT JUST THE SOFTWARE - THE HARDWARE IS MISSING AS WELL.

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...