Jump to content

Alex Jones's Latest Trial


alexa
 Share

Recommended Posts

Even though i cannot stand alex jones.

 

Even though i do not watch the news, i heard it the other day where i live, and weirdly it told people about this verdict.

 

Why would it be on news where i live, as people here, would never of heard of him probably?

 

We all know why, like people said, they are using this verdict to further push people are bonkers if they are against the narrative rubbish.

 

Brainwashing or what.

 

I wonder how many countries who people have not heard of alex jones, had this on there mainstream news?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, andy1033 said:

Even though i cannot stand alex jones.

 

Even though i do not watch the news, i heard it the other day where i live, and weirdly it told people about this verdict.

 

Why would it be on news where i live, as people here, would never of heard of him probably?

 

We all know why, like people said, they are using this verdict to further push people are bonkers if they are against the narrative rubbish.

 

Brainwashing or what.

 

I wonder how many countries who people have not heard of alex jones, had this on there mainstream news?

 

I just checked major Spanish, French, German, Finnish and Vietnam! press and yes all covering the story

 

https://elpais.com/internacional/2022-08-05/condenado-a-pagar-50-millones-el-ultraderechista-alex-jones-por-decir-que-la-matanza-de-sandy-hook-fue-un-teatro.html

 

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2022/08/06/alex-jones-ordered-to-pay-49-3-million-total-to-a-family-over-sandy-hook-lies_5992686_4.html

 

https://www.bild.de/politik/ausland/politik-ausland/verschwoerungs-theoretiker-alex-jones-zu-49-mio-dollar-strafe-verurteilt-80923986.bild.html

 

https://www.hs.fi/ulkomaat/art-2000008988578.html

 

https://vietbao.com/a313023/cai-gia-cho-doi-tra

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

See where this is trial is leading to Odds. It's the start of major legal censorship

 

 

Julian Assange, Alex Jones, John McAfee, now Trump. It's sending out a worldwide message, setting examples, of what happens if you want to get the truth out there, and if there is a huge public desire for it (which there is).

 

What have any of these men done, in terms of actual damage to humanity, compared to the neverending lies and deceit of the deep state cabal and mainstream media over decades, if not centuries? And yet they're continually hounded and persecuted. Like the Jesus story before them, theyre just scapegoats used to keep those who can see through the deception in line. Exactly the same narrative.

 

They also all had/have access to confidential documents, none of which have been fully revealed to the public as yet.

 

 

 

Edited by northern star
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting insight....

 

Also strange the three letter agencies waited till Epstein was dead before they raided his properties, long after he managed to move or destroy a lot of evidence, even spending $13million filling in tunnels on his island with concrete before he was arrested the second time. Just whose side are they on?

 

 

 

Edited by northern star
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is interesting so far, especally not having watched the trial. I'm half way through, but have to delay watching the remainder as I'm at work.

 

This was the 1st 2 of 13 law suits. 

 

He was not found guilty of defamation, but was deemed guilty by the technicality of non-compliance, for not submitting the financial & analytics data requested by the courts.

 

The damages figure is a nonsense because there are statutes in place that basically provide a formula for calculating the maximum that can be imposed, and the amount is way below that being bandied about. However, if the pending cases against him have similar results he will still be in the poop.

 

But he has liability insurance, so that's where the payment will come from at least for now. There'll be a maximum figure covered by that so he will probably not be protected from the total claims against him if the other suits go the same way.

 

I'm not swallowing his lawyer's accidental disclosure of privileged info to the opposition, and that strengthens my belief that it's a game that he's a willing player in. 

 

Anyway, the vid's here...

 

https://youtu.be/1EsWsaqs99I

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, northern star said:

even spending $13million filling in tunnels on his island with concrete


and having a fire, lets not forget that one. Concrete truck delivered to the island...building on Island dedicated to underground ventilation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

This is interesting so far, especally not having watched the trial. I'm half way through, but have to delay watching the remainder as I'm at work.

 

This was the 1st 2 of 13 law suits. 

 

He was not found guilty of defamation, but was deemed guilty by the technicality of non-compliance, for not submitting the financial & analytics data requested by the courts.

 

The damages figure is a nonsense because there are statutes in place that basically provide a formula for calculating the maximum that can be imposed, and the amount is way below that being bandied about. However, if the pending cases against him have similar results he will still be in the poop.

 

But he has liability insurance, so that's where the payment will come from at least for now. There'll be a maximum figure covered by that so he will probably not be protected from the total claims against him if the other suits go the same way.

 

I'm not swallowing his lawyer's accidental disclosure of privileged info to the opposition, and that strengthens my belief that it's a game that he's a willing player in. 

 

Anyway, the vid's here...

 

https://youtu.be/1EsWsaqs99I

 

 

He doesn't even own the company you know, him and the other shills are part of an LLC and under Steve Pieczenik, in collaboration with Roger Stone for General Jim Jones at Dynology.

 

Jones was making around £$250-$800k a month,  through info wars. Name another truther who got free publicity from the likes of Clinton et al espousing this cretin at any given moment? None, his platform whilst banned flourished due to this free advertising from the establishment. Shill bastard who's costing the rest of us out free speech. 

Edited by Morpheus
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/4/2022 at 4:56 PM, Mazthehobo said:

The way I see it is that people like Alex Jones and David Icke and others will always be mocked and ridiculed no matter what they say.

it doesn’t matter if 90% of what they have said is groundbreaking hot news that smashes the official narrative.

the media will concentrate on the 10% that they got wrong.

 

Here is the way power fucks up the CONSPIRACY SPACE:

 

- All HARD EVIDENCE which could VALIDATE a conspiracy theory is THOROUGHLY DESTROYED

 

- Even the smartest, sharpest conspiracy researcher now has to GUESS much of what MAY have happened based on WHO the perpetrators MAY have been and what MEANS they MAY have had

 

- Some researchers will guess RIGHT and some researchers will guess WRONG or PARTIALLY WRONG

 

- Nobody can PROVE anything because the EVIDENCE HAS BEEN DESTROYED OR REMOVED

 

- The conspiracy is often so VICIOUSLY OVER THE TOP that EVEN A 100% CORRECT GUESS sounds like CRAZY TALK to regular people

 

- Mainstream Media NEVER investigates. It SMEARS the good samaritans trying to unearth the truth

 

EXAMPLE:

 

- The World Trade Center Complex must have had DOZENS of CCTV cameras recording the persons, tools, equipment and vehicles entering and exiting the buildings through various ground floor entrances. 50, 60, 70 or 80 cameras at ground level alone.

 

- There is not 1 VIDEO FRAME that was ever made public from that CCTV footage. And some footage from the non-collapsed buildings should in fact be available.

 

- There isn't even information where the cameras were, what they were pointing at, or how many there were in total

 

- If someone filed a lawsuit demanding to see the footage, the court would be told that the SECURITY ROOM WHERE ALL THE FOOTAGE WAS BEING STORED WAS CRUSHED BY THE HUGE TOWER FALLING ON IT

 

- The harddisks and magnetic tape storing the footage were so heavily damaged that even the best efforts to extract imagery proved FUTILE

 

- There is no surviving record whatsoever of who are what entered the building in the weeks and months before the collapse

 

 

 

Now I could say "My spidey sense tells me that a group of maybe 2 dozen men disguised as maintenance workers entered the buildings repeatedly to do something illicit in there".

 

But it is a GUESS until such time that CCTV footage emerges of VANS entering the WTC garages at night, and men visibly unloading equipment that could be used to damage the buildings.

 

 

There is NO WAY there is such a record. And they would have ensured that ANY BUILDING SECURITY WATCHING THE CCTV MONITORS DIE IN THE COLLAPSE.

 

 

What MAY have survived is CCTV footage from other neighborhoods showing, say, a number of WHITE VANS driving to the WTC every day. And they MAY have contained the equipment that brought the towers down. But WHITE VANS driving through a city like New York is nothing unusual. If you said "Look! That's them! That's them!" people will respond "That could be anyone in those vans. That could be roof insulation in those vans, or Chinese food or furniture being delivered."

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Truthblast said:

 

Here is the way power fucks up the CONSPIRACY SPACE:

 

- All HARD EVIDENCE which could VALIDATE a conspiracy theory is THOROUGHLY DESTROYED

 

- Even the smartest, sharpest conspiracy researcher now has to GUESS much of what MAY have happened based on WHO the perpetrators MAY have been and what MEANS they MAY have had

 

- Some researchers will guess RIGHT and some researchers will guess WRONG or PARTIALLY WRONG

 

- Nobody can PROVE anything because the EVIDENCE HAS BEEN DESTROYED OR REMOVED

 

- The conspiracy is often so VICIOUSLY OVER THE TOP that EVEN A 100% CORRECT GUESS sounds like CRAZY TALK to regular people

 

- Mainstream Media NEVER investigates. It SMEARS the good samaritans trying to unearth the truth

 

EXAMPLE:

 

- The World Trade Center Complex must have had DOZENS of CCTV cameras recording the persons, tools, equipment and vehicles entering and exiting the buildings through various ground floor entrances. 50, 60, 70 or 80 cameras at ground level alone.

 

- There is not 1 VIDEO FRAME that was ever made public from that CCTV footage. And some footage from the non-collapsed buildings should in fact be available.

 

- There isn't even information where the cameras were, what they were pointing at, or how many there were in total

 

- If someone filed a lawsuit demanding to see the footage, the court would be told that the SECURITY ROOM WHERE ALL THE FOOTAGE WAS BEING STORED WAS CRUSHED BY THE HUGE TOWER FALLING ON IT

 

- The harddisks and magnetic tape storing the footage were so heavily damaged that even the best efforts to extract imagery proved FUTILE

 

- There is no surviving record whatsoever of who are what entered the building in the weeks and months before the collapse

 

 

 

Now I could say "My spidey sense tells me that a group of maybe 2 dozen men disguised as maintenance workers entered the buildings repeatedly to do something illicit in there".

 

But it is a GUESS until such time that CCTV footage emerges of VANS entering the WTC garages at night, and men visibly unloading equipment that could be used to damage the buildings.

 

 

There is NO WAY there is such a record. And they would have ensured that ANY BUILDING SECURITY WATCHING THE CCTV MONITORS DIE IN THE COLLAPSE.

 

 

What MAY have survived is CCTV footage from other neighborhoods showing, say, a number of WHITE VANS driving to the WTC every day. And they MAY have contained the equipment that brought the towers down. But WHITE VANS driving through a city like New York is nothing unusual. If you said "Look! That's them! That's them!" people will respond "That could be anyone in those vans. That could be roof insulation in those vans, or Chinese food or furniture being delivered."

 

 

 

 

 

....hehehe.....

 

 

 

Edited by novymir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normie see’s big fat conspiracy theorist has been milking the herd. Normie know believes all conspiracies are money making rackets.  Job done. All hail Alex Jones. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/8/2022 at 11:22 PM, Golden Retriever said:

 

See where this is trial is leading to Odds. It's the start of major legal censorship.

 

 

 

This trial is a psyop imo, with Alex Jones playing his part.

 

So the quote from Associated Press on Twitter has been deleted? saying people who question the Holocaust and Covid should

face legal prosecution too.

 

Hugo Talks says you are being played like a fiddle and I tend to agree.

 

I would like David Icke to stop his interviews with Alex Jones, some as recent as this year, because Alex Jones

imo is a Zionist shill, everything David Icke opposes?

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here we have 3 shills imo.

 

Interview with Andrew Neil, Alex Jones and the Jewish David Aaronovitch on BBC no less.

 

At the beginning on the interview, Jones says Bilderberg is about the muh Nazis!  Yes the founder has a Nazi connection, but most of the

people these days at Bilderberg don't want anything to do with National Socialists and the right wing.

 

Jones talks about American money going to the EU, but never mentions Israel gets most of US citizens tax money

 

This was a rare opportunity for Jones to really give some hard hitting facts about the world, but at the end he ranted beyond belief

and made the audience turn off.

 

David Aaronovitch asked "are you trying to expose this so called NWO, or part of it?"

 

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

At the beginning on the interview, Jones says Bilderberg is about the muh Nazis!  Yes the founder has a Nazi connection, but most of the

people these days at Bilderberg don't want anything to do with National Socialists and the right wing.

 

Jones talks about American money going to the EU, but never mentions Israel gets most of US citizens tax money


Look in to the beginnings of EU, UN, NATO, bilderberg etc, Nazis. Look at who installed leadership in Ukraine. Look at their hierarchy and incorporation of Nazis in to infrastructure. Look at Nazi germany transferring their scientists to USA/Russia countered, did the nazi agenda stop? eugenics still exists and is prevalent, what other agendas did they have? propaganda didnt die, it made the west beleive they can do no evil whilst they are a major driving force behind why the world is how it is today. Hitler was a puppet of the controlling families, not a lone mad man. Also Nazi is nothing to do with national socialists...that is not where the name came from. At all.

NWO, communism, totalitarianism, nazism, same coin with same people driving it with the same end goal in mind. Hitler and Stalin worked together, documents prove that as they had the same puppeteers. 

Edited by TheConsultant
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/8/2022 at 6:29 AM, alexa said:

In the Daily fail today...........:classic_rolleyes:

 

Will America's conspiracy king finally be silenced? Deranged radio host Alex Jones made millions peddling far-fetched fantasies to the gullible. But after his sickening lies about the Sandy Hook massacre, he's finally been made to pay,

 

 

This is how it works: regardless of your opinion of Alex Jones, he has over the years covered a number of 'conspiracies' and exposed a lot of truth.

 

"Far-fetched fantasies" indeed.

 

However this is now about completely discrediting the man, and getting people to question whether everything that they have come to believe (from Alex Jones and InfoWars) is also a bunch of 'sickening lies'.

 

For what its worth, I think Alex Jones did used to be the 'real deal', but as with others, such as Tommy Robinson, they get 'bought up' and manipulated into becoming 'controlled opposition' and/or Zionist shills. They dangle you a few 'truths' to get you hooked, then start tempting you with misinfo and disnfo about other 'conspiracies' without really getting to the root cause of it all.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

This is how it works: regardless of your opinion of Alex Jones, he has over the years covered a number of 'conspiracies' and exposed a lot of truth.

 

"Far-fetched fantasies" indeed.

 

However this is now about completely discrediting the man, and getting people to question whether everything that they have come to believe (from Alex Jones and InfoWars) is also a bunch of 'sickening lies'.

 

For what its worth, I think Alex Jones did used to be the 'real deal', but as with others, such as Tommy Robinson, they get 'bought up' and manipulated into becoming 'controlled opposition' and/or Zionist shills. They dangle you a few 'truths' to get you hooked, then start tempting you with misinfo and disnfo about other 'conspiracies' without really getting to the root cause of it all.

 

Yep, this is how I feel about AJ, he's been bought, they did the same with the Mark Sargent & Patricia Steer in the flat earth movement. It's surprising how many can be bought.

But AJ I've suspected him for a good few years now.

And now with this trial, I can only put the reason down to, is to put the fear into those who question the official lies, oops I meant stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/4/2022 at 9:56 AM, Mazthehobo said:

The way I see it is that people like Alex Jones and David Icke and others will always be mocked and ridiculed no matter what they say.

it doesn’t matter if 90% of what they have said is groundbreaking hot news that smashes the official narrative.

the media will concentrate on the 10% that they got wrong. 

 

If I tell someone that I have just seen something interesting on the Alex Jones show or David Icke interview they will come back straight away with “oh that guy who claims sandy hook is a hoax / the guy who thinks he’s the son of god?

 

they dismiss it straight away. Even if their own criticisms are wide of the mark.

 

personally I read most Ickes/Jones/Hugo talks etc because I like to hear other people’s views. For a laugh I even listen to the bbc.

 

whats interesting though is if someone says they saw some pro vaccine stuff on the bbc which was good I never respond with “oh the guys who framed Diana or the company with a paedo statue on their walls?” Maybe I should start that.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/12/2022 at 12:43 PM, TheConsultant said:


Look in to the beginnings of EU, UN, NATO, bilderberg etc, Nazis. Look at who installed leadership in Ukraine. Look at their hierarchy and incorporation of Nazis in to infrastructure. Look at Nazi germany transferring their scientists to USA/Russia countered, did the nazi agenda stop? eugenics still exists and is prevalent, what other agendas did they have? propaganda didnt die, it made the west beleive they can do no evil whilst they are a major driving force behind why the world is how it is today. Hitler was a puppet of the controlling families, not a lone mad man. Also Nazi is nothing to do with national socialists...that is not where the name came from. At all.

NWO, communism, totalitarianism, nazism, same coin with same people driving it with the same end goal in mind. Hitler and Stalin worked together, documents prove that as they had the same puppeteers. 

 

I know they didn't call themselves Nazis, but National Socialism WAS their ideology. Nazism doesn't just mean eugenics either, and eugenics isn't even exclusive to Nazis.

 

Capitalism and Communism are two sides of the same coin, but National Socialism is third positionism. Stop with the nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Capitalism and Communism are two sides of the same coin, but National Socialism is third positionism.

You are overlooking a larger umbrella at play, elite bloodlines controlled both. Some of which were up until recently in positions of power in multiple EU countries, the third option is still controlled by the umbrella bloodlines and for anyone concerned by that, they are being collapsed in real time. Whatever you do don't look in to family trees.

Edited by TheConsultant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

You are overlooking a larger umbrella at play, elite bloodlines controlled both. Some of which were up until recently in positions of power in multiple EU countries. 

 

I don't deny that elites played a part in NatSoc Germany, but I think comparing what we're seeing today with National Socialism is laughable. Explain white people becoming a hated minority and the rampant degeneracy if the cabal are Nazis. It makes no sense to the politically literate. Explain the demographics of France today, something muh Nazis predicted. Explain why we're still getting screwed by usury.

 

Alex is absolutely a subversive well poisoner, and there are plenty of examples of this if you know where to look. If you want to ignore that then fair enough.

 

Operation Paperclip is just taking the spoils of war too. We can see that "American" policies obviously don't reflect National Socialist ideology, so the idea of them calling the shots in the States is silly.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

I don't deny that elites played a part in NatSoc Germany, but I think comparing what we're seeing today with National Socialism is laughable. Explain white people becoming a hated minority and the rampant degeneracy if the cabal are Nazis.

What does propaganda do?
 

2 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Alex


Who?
 

2 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Operation Paperclip is just taking the spoils of war too. We can see that "American" policies obviously don't reflect National Socialist ideology, so the idea of them calling the shots in the States is silly.


May as well say "well we aren't speaking German, where's your evidence?". USA became the propaganda arm of another place, it also became the corporation and military arm of another country, it is not or was not controlled by people inside USA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...