Jump to content

Alex Jones's Latest Trial


alexa
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, novymir said:

The point was them "that support ZOG fiction" should "repent"....turn away from that , change their minds , reverse...

Then again, they don't have to...do what thou wilt...

Duh!

 

Im just fucking with you anyway Nov..been out worshipping sun for an hour & enjoying some water melon. Peace brother.😀

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Im just fucking with you anyway Nov..been out worshipping sun for an hour & enjoying some water melon. Peace brother.😀

Okay, well you did give me the 1st genuine laugh I've had for a couple days. Peace to you too.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oddsnsods said:

I dont debait or care for the fiction.

 

Oh and silly me thought this was a place where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged. 

I'll remember its only one way traffic from you in future 👍

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, melanie said:

 

Oh and silly me thought this was a place where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged. 

I'll remember its only one way traffic from you in future 👍

This forum tends to look att he bigger picture yes,  as in free speech. Jones was clearly being censored by the far left activist judge all the way through the case*. My previous posts have explained my position on a fair case like for example the actor lawyer attacking AJ for a video that was put out showing the judge burning..in a real case that would have been dismissed straight away, its drama & I pity the fool that takes it seriously.

 

case* is not a trial...but was more like a trial than a case.🤐

Edited by oddsnsods
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, melanie said:

 

Oh and silly me thought this was a place where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged. 

I'll remember its only one way traffic from you in future 👍


I made the same error, do not get me wrong some decent discussions do occur - but some are utterly stuck on how they see it rather than investigating and hashing it out which is weird as I thought that was what forums were for

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheConsultant said:


I made the same error, do not get me wrong some decent discussions do occur - but some are utterly stuck on how they see it rather than investigating and hashing it out which is weird as I thought that was what forums were for

 

Patriots in control.🤤

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2022 at 5:42 PM, novymir said:

Your response looks like "artificial intelligence" to me.

 

I have no idea what you are talking about. Just because somebody stands opposed to a consensus view - ie. Sandy Hook was faked (an absurd notion), does not mean they reject the consensus on all subjects. I think it a very poor state of affairs if people swallow every conspiracy going. 

 

On 8/6/2022 at 5:42 PM, novymir said:

Jesus said: "...let the dead bury the dead...".

 

Nah. He's a fictional character, he didn't say that. I do find it funny that in the modern world where words are distorted 2 seconds after being spoken, that religious sorts can genuiney think words supposedly uttered over 2000 years ago are accurately reported.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

This forum tends to look att he bigger picture yes,  as in free speech. Jones was clearly being censored by the far left activist judge all the way through the case*. My previous posts have explained my position on a fair case like for example the actor lawyer attacking AJ for a video that was put out showing the judge burning..in a real case that would have been dismissed straight away, its drama & I pity the fool that takes it seriously.

 

case* is not a trial...but was more like a trial than a case.🤐

 

You watched all of the it?

Were Jones's lawyers in on this scam which was live for all the world to see?

I know you don't debate, but would you make an exception and explain why the burning judge would have brought a dismissal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Its legal fiction anyway & they are all act'ors why should you play their game?

 

Can you highlight where Jones presented any evidence in support of his loud mouth claim? He had the perfect chnace to target mainstream viewers and show his conclusive facts. But instead he recanted his whole case. This whole thing was an exercise in Jones gobbing off about something just to be contraversial and make him $$$$$$s. I have never liked him, shouty-man who tars the alternative research field with this same air of unreasonable behaviour. I like David's more level-headed approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Arnie said:

 

I have no idea what you are talking about. Just because somebody stands opposed to a consensus view - ie. Sandy Hook was faked (an absurd notion), does not mean they reject the consensus on all subjects. I think it a very poor state of affairs if people swallow every conspiracy going. 

 

 

Nah. He's a fictional character, he didn't say that. I do find it funny that in the modern world where words are distorted 2 seconds after being spoken, that religious sorts can genuiney think words supposedly uttered over 2000 years ago are accurately reported.

With respect, and Im a total atheist, Jesus is not a fictional character. There are records in both Israel and Rome. There are also records from Pontius Pilate.

Now whether that Jesus is like the Bible portrays him is another matter. Clearly the Bible has been doctored by so many that it holds no real significsnce but the records do exist for Jesus the man

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bombadil said:

With respect, and Im a total atheist, Jesus is not a fictional character. There are records in both Israel and Rome. There are also records from Pontius Pilate.

Now whether that Jesus is like the Bible portrays him is another matter. Clearly the Bible has been doctored by so many that it holds no real significsnce but the records do exist for Jesus the man

 

And you believe such records coming from the same groups of people who routinely blind everyone with lies? I respectfuly disagree and that wasn't even his name in the so-called evidence.

Did Jesus Exist? (godlessgeeks.com)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said the records exist. Doesn't mean he was as mentioned in the Bible.

If you go to the Museums of Rome. The Museo Nazionale Romano. They have records on display. I can read Latin quite well and the the documents I read seemed to be saying what they claimed. Are they faked I don't know obviously. Remember for the Romans Jesus was just a pain in the arse. Plus Romans kept records that would shame most countries today

The same could be said for Mark Thomas's account in the link. There are so many versions of what went on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Arnie said:

 

Can you highlight where Jones presented any evidence in support of his loud mouth claim? He had the perfect chnace to target mainstream viewers and show his conclusive facts. But instead he recanted his whole case. This whole thing was an exercise in Jones gobbing off about something just to be contraversial and make him $$$$$$s. I have never liked him, shouty-man who tars the alternative research field with this same air of unreasonable behaviour. I like David's more level-headed approach.

 

Well exactly if AJ was worried about losing money, he would have made some kind of real case. Alex is a mason & knows his money is safe.

I pointed out earlier how the plaintiff has been arrested previously for signing fake cheques. In other words, he was a felon.

Why was this not brought up.

Sandy Hook parent offered plea deal

https://www.ctpost.com/newtownshooting/article/Sandy-Hook-parent-offered-plea-deal-4500742.php

 

 

What kind of court room?

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an American, he should legally be able to express any idea about anything he wishes. Having a platform which allows for a wider audience to hear what he is saying should not, in anyway, hinder his, or anyone's right to free speech. Keeping in mind what crazy, ass shit others have been and are currently being allowed to say about many other, "controversial" ideas and theories and yet not face any criminal...or personal...prosecution. 

 

Not much different from Trump's situation. Sure, he said/says some crazy shit, sometimes, but our country was running like a well, oiled machine for the first time in a long time. After they successfully kept him out for his second term and replaced him, L.G. Brandon runs the country into the shitter overnight. I've never seen such a quick decline with everything in American under anyone else's watch. Now, with L.G. Brandon sending billions...with a "B"...to the Ukraine "war effort" every week, his crackhead, pedophile son flaunting his depravity openly on his personal laptop, ties between L.G. Brandon and Brandon, Jr. to all sorts of dirty money deals...who is currently being prosecuted for his "crimes", Trump. 

 

It's clearly Right wing, Christian, and Whites, especially White men, who are being round up, punished, silence, shut down, etc. Alex has continued to build an audience, as have other Right wing, conservative leaning websites, news programs, forums, and all. TPTB don't give a shit about Sandy Hook "parents and/or children" nor Alex's views and theories about the event. To be honest, I've not even been following this story regarding his trail. I don't take him that seriously and haven't enjoyed his website in years. I prefer to read news stories, and most of his are videos. It's one thing to read Paul Joseph Watson, it's a whole other thing to have to look at him and hear that voice of his.

 

 

My views on Sandy Hook, you say? I don't believe any children died. I believe it was nothing more than a money making scheme. One that is still paying off, thanks to Alex Jones and his InfoWars show. Of course, I can express my views freely like this because, unlike Alex, I'm just a poor schlub with hardly a dime to my name.

 

craiyon-085513-photo-realistic-claymatio

"My lawyer suggest you tell the nice people you were just kiddin' about all that, King Kitty!"

 

Thanks Alex and Alex's lawyer. And you're absolutely right, I'm really sorry, especially to you, Mr Robby Parker. 

 

4881861-orig.png

"No offense taken, Mr Kitty. This shit is funny as Hell."

 

 

Robbie+Parker+Sandy+Hook+funeral+smile.j

Edited by KingKitty
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KingKitty said:

As an American, he should legally be able to express any idea about anything he wishes.

 

Ok lets say Jones posted all over the net some lie about you. Things got so crazy people were out to get you, to the point you were scared for your life as nutters were coming to your home. Fine with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, melanie said:

 

Ok lets say Jones posted all over the net some lie about you. Things got so crazy people were out to get you, to the point you were scared for your life as nutters were coming to your home. Fine with that?

Not taking one side over the other. I didnt follow the trial. Is the accusers account of harassment etc 100% proven? After all it is America. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said Kitty, we live in a world where people who are associated with Putin can have all their assets stolen & Tennis players banned from attending events based on what country they were born in, unless they denounce Putins crimes.

Even tho nobody has declared war with Russia, this happens worldwide under one NWO umbrella.

Although I do recall Trump banning Muslims from the US. (accept Saudis)🤔

 

Not too mention people being refused entry to countries because of their  jab booster status, from a jab that offers zero immunity.

How would that play out in a court of law?

People having their assets frozen for organizing protests.

Fined $6000 now in Canada if you refuse to download an app to travel..jabbed or not.

 

All the blatant tyranny we have witnessed in the last two years & human rights lawyers silent the whole time.

We even have our dEmOCrAtIc govenments trying to sign away our sovereignty to the WHO.

How can anyone take anything serious from the global junta I find hilarious & they cant even get their tiny little minds around the idea Sandy Hook was blatant BS.

 

its all boiling the frog Totalitarian fandango..& normies on command can blame it all on Alex Jones & Brexit.🤤

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

Well said Kitty, we live in a world where people who are associated with Putin can have all their assets stolen & Tennis players banned from attending events based on what country they were born in, unless they denounce Putins crimes.

Even tho nobody has declared war with Russia, this happens worldwide under one NWO umbrella.

Although I do recall Trump banning Muslims from the US. (accept Saudis)🤔

 

Not too mention people being refused entry to countries because of their  jab booster status, from a jab that offers zero immunity.

How would that play out in a court of law?

People having their assets frozen for organizing protests.

Fined $6000 now in Canada if you refuse to download an app to travel..jabbed or not.

 

All the blatant tyranny we have witnessed in the last two years & human rights lawyers silent the whole time.

We even have our dEmOCrAtIc govenments trying to sign away our sovereignty to the WHO.

How can anyone take anything serious from the global junta I find hilarious & they cant even get their tiny little minds around the idea Sandy Hook was blatant BS.

 

its all boiling the frog Totalitarian fandango..& normies on command can blame it all on Alex Jones & Brexit.🤤

 

Still can't buy Russian vodka in Australia. 🤬

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

Not taking one side over the other. I didnt follow the trial. Is the accusers account of harassment etc 100% proven? After all it is America. 

 

Lucy Richards went to jail for it, is that good enough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incitement to violence is an offence / crime [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incitement ].

 

Denying or questioning an incident is not a crime; 'conspiracy theorising' is not a crime, it is an application of free thought and free speech.

 

Did Jones directly incite anyone to violence? If not, leave him alone. If he did, then apply the law like you would to anyone else.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...