Jump to content

Why the earth is flat


 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

so why does it say "theconsultant said"

 

Depends on the way that members quote another post .... it is easy to corrupt without intending to do so!

 

Lets see ....

 

6 minutes ago, lake said:

I didnt post that

 

So I quote YOU from the quote of you I posted and it states that I did it .... the actual quote is ....

 

20 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

I didnt post that

 

When a member quotes another members post the database holds it as their post .... if a member quotes from a quote then (more than likely) it will show as the incorrect members post.

It is nothing but members not really interacting with the forum software correctly .... or that the forum software has not been written that well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fully agree with that happening easily except the time frame is out of whack as it states quite clearly that I said it an hour after posting, the same time I did make a post in this thread, soatb posted that 6 hours ago at the time. 

I shall investigate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, hardtruthspitta said:

yo sick, dont know why youd pull back from that. i say own it.

 

isnt that really the ultimate issue? the indoctrination it takes so people can think they can walk upside down, and drive vehicles, use tower cranes etc?

Ay Spitta, I hear you, I suppose it's because it was from a couple of posters here I respect. If it was some trolls sitting in their bedrooms being paid by the hour to be a slow witted, backstabbing retard, having never sought or experienced the love of a good woman, then ... they would be told to have vigorous sexual intercourse with themselves.😄
(or words to that effect 👍)
 

 

Edited by sickofallthebollocks
my shit spelling - 'their'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

Out of interest what did change your opinion on FE?

ABsolutely loads and loads, Gravity - or lack of, water is always level, evidence from space and moon is fishy to say the least - or a downright lie - I tend to think the latter. 
I don't want to bore anyone or flatter myself that people are interested in my thoughts, all I can say is, for me, the very last thing was that tepid water cannot retain a bend. Impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

or flatter myself that people are interested in my thoughts

 

I am for one .... interested in your thoughts?

 

The more I see and read shows me that this place is a written script but it is changing constantly .... You have posted much of late which shows the reverse editing of this place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

ABsolutely loads and loads, Gravity - or lack of, water is always level, evidence from space and moon is fishy to say the least - or a downright lie - I tend to think the latter. 
I don't want to bore anyone or flatter myself that people are interested in my thoughts, all I can say is, for me, the very last thing was that tepid water cannot retain a bend. Impossible.


Gravity is already known and understood though. Tepid water cannot retain a bend? Water of any temperature always fits the vessel it is contained within, plus a meniscus is surface tension and a bend of the water surface whether that be convex or concave.

Thanks for replying.

Edited by TheConsultant
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, lake said:

 

I am for one .... interested in your thoughts?

 

The more I see and read shows me that this place is a written script but it is changing constantly .... You have posted much of late which shows the reverse editing of this place.

Thanks Lake, I would be interested in your thoughts on the matter too - only - you're a mod so you would have to remain impartial, correct?

My thoughts:
I am your typical kid, by that, a well meaning young fella with a good dose of mischief and street smarts.   Loved all the usual things, Bmx'ing, climbing trees, breakdancing, music,  making dens, having a good scrap, all the usual boyish stuff.     As well as Dinosaurs (which could also be a load of BS) I really used to love all things space, you name it, star trek, star wars (apart from ALL the remade shite) star trek films, and the 1st series of star trek and the one with cap'n prickard, all the other films involving space, Alien, spaceballs, galaxy quest, the explorers, moonraker, and contact, more specifically the last 30 minutes of contact which I found captivating.  So a big Space fan was I, and, of course, a straight-up globe believer, flat earth was just not in my mind as a worthwhile subject worthy of note, even though I have always been on the awakening side of things - still flat earth was just a bit of a joke to me.
The wonder of Space, of it's infinate expanse, it's wonders, and everything else about it I 100% believed - without question, I loved it, which is why - when I take a good honest look at myself - kind of in the third person - without any ego, emotion or attatchment to how I used to think about space, I really feel released from it all, I think it's all lies, I state this without any 'fuck you' to space and the globe, I just feel that I am a step closer to the truth of things when I follow this way of thought, I have always felt guided by something, something benevolent, something guided me to this way of thinking and it wasn't this thread, or the other threads on this forum.
WHo knows what this guidance could be?  A higher part of me? Spirits, God?  Or just - what I perceive to be good old common sense?
This decision was a culmination of both facts and feelings, both on the globe side and on the FE side, and I came to this decision over the space of probably a couple of years.
Many people I know and spend time with are Globeys, and many are FE, we all get along, we all respect one anothers views.
For me, it was a combination of looking into everything I could, digesting it, forgetting alot of it because I'm fecking useless at remembering alot of things, but not before weighing it all up in my own 'weighing scales of possibility' and coming to a very non rushed decision based not only on facts but feeling.
I'm sorry for the long answer or waxing lyrical a little?  But my truth is this, I look forward to being wrong if what I presently perceive is wrong.
But, overall, for all the facts and feelings I have, water does not retain a bend.

(please forgive spelling and grammatical errors I've not read this back I just wanted to ype it out as it came to me)
 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, lake said:

 

The more I see and read shows me that this place is a written script but it is changing constantly .... You have posted much of late which shows the reverse editing of this place.

Really like what you put here Lake, can you expand on this a little?    eg: written script - reverse editing.
I have a good idea what you mean but interested in your meaning?  cheers.👍

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

eg: written script - reverse editing.

 

I will try and put into words what I consider but it is fucking difficult .... It is my whole life and that is hard to explain!

Will need to take some time about that mate .... me just saying that "You can change the past as it is only your individual future" .... will not help :(

I need a better way to present the concept I consider as a truth (or a stepping stone) which I consider currently!

 

17 minutes ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

you're a mod so you would have to remain impartial, correct?

 

Yes.

 

The concept is that I as a mod have no bias .... but we all know that is impossible!

And I fuck up just the same as anyone may do!

I also have my personal considerations .... which may be incorrect but I as yet may not know that they are!

 

So it is all a bit of a difficult position.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, lake said:

 

I will try and put into words what I consider but it is fucking difficult .... It is my whole life and that is hard to explain!

Will need to take some time about that mate .... me just saying that "You can change the past as it is only your individual future" .... will not help :(

I need a better way to present the concept I consider as a truth (or a stepping stone) which I consider currently!

 

 

Yes.

 

The concept is that I as a mod have no bias .... but we all know that is impossible!

And I fuck up just the same as anyone may do!

I also have my personal considerations .... which may be incorrect but I as yet may not know that they are!

 

So it is all a bit of a difficult position.

Yeah, feel free to pm me if you like Lake - and only if and when you're ready.👍 Again, only if you want too.

Does our mind/thoughts our innermost 'us' (me, I etc...) - when they are from the heart, from a place of good and pure intent, divine intent, effect not only the now? This moment? But the future moments 'you' are about to experience, therefore the past path that you 'were' on - and the future of 'that' past - is no longer valid - because you have reveresed engineered it by thinking with divine intent.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheConsultant said:


 Tepid water cannot retain a bend? Water of any temperature always fits the vessel it is contained within, plus a meniscus is surface tension and a bend of the water surface whether that be convex or concave.

Thanks for replying.

No worries, thanks for the question.   I do wonder after reading your post - what vessel the water contained on earth is 'within'.
As you rightly say - water fits a vessel at any temperature, as water is naturally maleable, and forms to what is containing 'it'  from all sides, however, water over the globe model is not contained on all sides, it is stuck to the globe which iteself is spinning at 66k per hour?   It also is sold to us that water is also ALWAYS level - that is - apart from when surface tension is pulling and bending it to the suface, when suddenly we are asked to believe that water IS bending and retaining that bend without outside application of force - and that when surface tension is pulling it  - it holds and retains a bend - invisibly?  without a vessel containing it?
You could stand on any cove in any country and look out to see, it is level, move along a mile and look again - it is level, you could do this every mile in a straight line across the Earth and the water is always level - at no point is that water 'bending'.

I don't think you'll be allowed to answer this one back TheConsultant as it will turn into a to-&-fro which isn't allowed on this particular thread.
Thanks for your imput though.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

No worries, thanks for the question.   I do wonder after reading your post - what vessel the water contained on earth is 'within'.
As you rightly say - water fits a vessel at any temperature, as water is naturally maleable, and forms to what is containing 'it'  from all sides, however, water over the globe model is not contained on all sides, it is stuck to the globe which iteself is spinning at 66k per hour?   It also is sold to us that water is also ALWAYS level - that is - apart from when surface tension is pulling and bending it to the suface, when suddenly we are asked to believe that water IS bending and retaining that bend without outside application of force - and that when surface tension is pulling it  - it holds and retains a bend - invisibly?  without a vessel containing it?
You could stand on any cove in any country and look out to see, it is level, move along a mile and look again - it is level, you could do this every mile in a straight line across the Earth and the water is always level - at no point is that water 'bending'.

I don't think you'll be allowed to answer this one back TheConsultant as it will turn into a to-&-fro which isn't allowed on this particular thread.
Thanks for your imput though.
 

All very easily answered, and my mentioning of surface tension and the vessel it is contained within was not related to it being contained in one. It was based on your statement that water of a certain temperature cannot retain a bend and so I showed an example of that not being the case. Equillibrium is what occurs when many forces are all in balance with one another, the speed in which we spin and the gravitational acceleration is equal, much like you see a water droplet (spherical), it is in equilibrium and follows conservation of energy, it wishes to be at its most efficient and lowest energy level of rest. Which is what keeps planets and constellations in the same positions all whilst still all moving as one.

The issue I have with these topics being separated is that FE does raise some interesting things in some areas and not being able to discuss it in a singular thread is frustrating.

Edited by TheConsultant
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheConsultant said:

All very easily answered, and my mentioning of surface tension and the vessel it is contained within was not related to it being contained in one. It was based on your statement that water of a certain temperature cannot retain a bend and so I showed an example of that not being the case. Equillibrium is what occurs when many forces are all in balance with on another, the speed in which we spin and the gravitational accelleration is equal, much like you see a water droplet, it is in equillibrium and follows conservation of energy, it wishes to be at its most efficient and lowest energy level of rest. Which is what keeps planets and constellations in the same positions all whilst still all moving as one.

The issue I have with these topics being separated is that FE does raise some interesting things, in some areas and not being able to discuss it in a singular thread is frustrating.

The problem is that there is constant trolling by some.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

All very easily answered, and my mentioning of surface tension and the vessel it is contained within was not related to it being contained in one. It was based on your statement that water of a certain temperature cannot retain a bend and so I showed an example of that not being the case.

Yeah thanks COnsultant, I don't know why I put in the word 'tepid' - it wasn't needed?  It kind of threw off what I was trying to say, but thanks for your time in the replies. 👍

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

The problem is that there is constant trolling by some.

No I fully understand that, trolls appear on all threads though it seems. 
 

6 minutes ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

Yeah thanks COnsultant, I don't know why I put in the word 'tepid' - it wasn't needed?  It kind of threw off what I was trying to say, but thanks for your time in the replies


All is good in the hood as they say. I hope my reply wasn't too tepid? Not a word I hear often enough!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, lake said:

The issue is that NO one seems to consider the other view points and NO one ever actually interacts regarding those points .... thus the 23 hidden threads containing thousands of posts about the subject which ALL went round and round in the exact same circles.

 

Sadly people will not move from the fixed consideration they have formed even on this forum (whichever consideration that may be)!

 

It would seem that 'people' are Not moving from that which they currently consider correct .... which is a very limiting and disabling 'force' infecting them!

 

Maybe a thread which considers Why people get 'fixed' into limited beliefs should be stared?

That's not true I always consider whats been said ,and I for one would be willing to change my view if some evidence would be forth coming not just some idiot on utube wishing to increase his or her view tally or some erroneous quote from the good book,maybe an hypothesis with predictive qualities or some such ,then I'd take it seriously

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, lake said:

 

The issue is that NO one seems to consider the other view points and NO one ever actually interacts regarding those points .... thus the 23 hidden threads containing thousands of posts about the subject which ALL went round and round in the exact same circles.

 

Sadly people will not move from the fixed consideration they have formed even on this forum (whichever consideration that may be)!

 

It would seem that 'people' are Not moving from that which they currently consider correct .... which is a very limiting and disabling 'force' infecting them!

 

Maybe a thread which considers Why people get 'fixed' into limited beliefs should be stared?

It is hopeless, nothing can be changed. The order of magnitude of what is based on illusions is close to 100%. Every religion knows precisely nothing. What calls itself science is nothing more than current religions. I only say technomagic. The way it works is unknown, whether it can even be called a technology is completely unknown. No one has been able to decode it. The children of earth will pursue what is specified. That is why everything will go round in circles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Bombadil locked, unlocked and locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...