Jump to content

Why the earth is flat


 Share

Recommended Posts

On 7/28/2022 at 12:20 AM, zArk said:

JTolan

 

Using photogrammetry based on aerial 830nm IR images, we derive the curvature of the earth surface in the upper mid-west states to a stunning precision

 

:

 

JTolan in comments ----- watch the 3D clip on a computer monitor, not a large TV, the spacing between red and blue is too wide and you won't perceive 3D] my spell checker failed , intro slide typo "Photogrametry" not Phtogrametry" grrrrrrr, let me know if you see any other typos, or errors. Maybe I'll upload a corrected one later. 23:25, if you noticed I adjusted the radius of the earth to 50 000 mi to try and curve fit the observed data, and the green line came up, (eventually, my computer was running slow and the update took a while) but even that value is not enough, the observed radius of curvature is more like 100 000 miles, but that's just because I did not fine tune the slope just perfectly, otherwise it would be INFINITE ! Just Incredible

 

 

 

Yes! That is stuff I have been seeing. Does it prove flat? At least something vastly larger? That guy's whole channel is really something everyone should look at.

 

As I posted on another thread...

 

 At this point, I honestly am not sure. The long distance stuff is really quite fascinating. If the Earth's circumference is really around 25,000 miles, then the Earth's surface must curve a certain amount over any distance. We hear 8 inches per mile squared is a simple way to calculate this and when compared to the actual trig, it works for any of the distances we see in all the photos and videos

 

Here is another one of those black swans that odds was talking about...

 

And here is really good one dealing with just the horizon itself, why people think they see curvature and what the horizon truly looks like at high altitudes from cameras designed to not distort and curve the edges...

 

The guy making the videos above goes by taboo conspiracy and he has much more video showing these exact same problems. Still does not prove flat, but more land? Just maybe? Something is off for sure. Here is one of his compilations with many more of these observations,,,

Quite an awesome psyop to hide land and resources if nothing else?

 

Out of time

What are they hiding?

Later

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MOD NOTE: KEEP ON TOPIC EVERYONE. IVE JUST CLEANED UP LOADS OF OFF TOPIC POSTS. HAVING A SEPERATE TOPIC TO DISCUSS FLAT EARTH DOES NOT MEAN AN OPPORTUNITY TO POST JUNK. IF YOU WANT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY POST BETTER. ALSO JUST POSTING RELIGIOUS QUOTES TO EXPLAIN THE NATURE OF FLAT EARTH IS NOT OK. IT PROVIDES NO PROOF JUST BELIEF

 

NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/25/2022 at 9:56 AM, alexa said:

The Axis Mundi, the center of earth which could only exist on a flat stationary earth. Where is the center of the ball earth ?

 

no that's not true...

 

the spiritual centre is everywhere. Each religion will have a symbolic outer axis mundi that is a representation of the spiritual centre FOR THEM but it is different for everyone depending on their individual myth. But that 'physical' axis mundi is really just a symbol.....a prop

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

no that's not true...

 

the spiritual centre is everywhere. Each religion will have a symbolic outer axis mundi that is a representation of the spiritual centre FOR THEM but it is different for everyone depending on their individual myth. But that 'physical' axis mundi is really just a symbol.....a prop

 

IMO it is a real place via the north pole/ the magnetic pole, with a gigantic whirlpool where the input & output of tides occur every 6 hours. It is this magnetic pole which keeps the firmament turning along with the the stars, moon & the sun.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Bombadil
Factually incorrect
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

That was South Pole

 

And the North :classic_biggrin:

 

On May 9, 1926 Commander Richard Byrd announced that he had been the first to fly over the North Pole in his Fokker tri-motor airplane, the Josephine Ford. Byrd submitted his navigational records to the U.S. Navy and a committee of the National Geographic Society, who verified his claim.

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Richard-E-Byrd

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, zArk said:

 

level

 

Screenshot_2022-08-02-08-26-38-652_com.google.android.youtube.jpg.c2e524561c1c9723631f244c6fd6983c.jpg

 

 

I think level could still be a psyop, but far larger? At this point I would say clearly. They count on the fact that no one will do the math. I just did it for this one...

Either way, this guy is really good. Thanks for posting.

 

 

5 hours ago, Bombadil said:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

I think level could still be a psyop, but far larger?


I think that is genuinely very plausible. Flight paths are controlled, certain air space is banned, shipping is controlled. It is not outside of the remit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

And the North :classic_biggrin:

 

On May 9, 1926 Commander Richard Byrd announced that he had been the first to fly over the North Pole in his Fokker tri-motor airplane, the Josephine Ford. Byrd submitted his navigational records to the U.S. Navy and a committee of the National Geographic Society, who verified his claim.

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Richard-E-Byrd

 

53 minutes ago, alexa said:

he had been the first to fly over the North Pole

 

?

Edited by WD40
cause i want to
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/2/2022 at 12:20 PM, endfreemasonscum said:

I think level could still be a psyop, but far larger? At this point I would say clearly. They count on the fact that no one will do the math. I just did it for this one...

Either way, this guy is really good. Thanks for posting.

Bom, check this out as it relates to our prior discussion. This is agreed on by flearthers and glearthers alike. Ask anyone with math skills and all what follows will be the exact agreed upon maths for all of it, assuming this was a globe, 25000 miles in circumference. This is what has been claimed since way before any of us were born... and all of the important claimants? F__king masons.

 

At 35000 feet the horizon begins at around 225 miles (229.3). Everything beyond that point, starting from the top, cannot be visible. And the farther the distance, the less that can be seen. If Earth were a sphere the size claimed.

 

Now it gets weirder. Over 1000 miles, a drop of just over 125 miles must be accepted by both sides. And when we factor in a height of 35000 feet for where we can approximate where the video was taken from, almost 75 miles has to be completely hidden!

 

The bulge height alone, or the center point between the observer and the target is over 31 miles!

 

What can we actually construe from this information? In simple terms, we cannot exist on a globe if it is anywhere even near the size the masonic narrative claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

Why would writers write all these books on something that doesn't exist ?

None of it exists as you would like it to. Everything has been written by primitives, none of them had an insight into the higher dimensional reality. A worldwide pure speculation of which one has copied from the other. You don't understand at all what we are seen as and on what primitive level we are. Your flat earth dream is nothing but an illusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Bombadil locked, unlocked and locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...