Jump to content

#clownsinspace - what does it say about a society that has ignored so much evidence?


Recommended Posts

"Green screens, chroma-key screens, zero-gravity air-planes, video manipulation, wires, and harnesses. Just some of the ways that space is faked. What does it say about a society that has ignored so much evidence?"

 

short and just a great compilation of some of the dumbest shit they actually released...

 

 

this is important, more now than ever. this is because of how fast their technology is accelerating. in a short time, no one will be able to tell the difference. i recommend saving this. youtube hates this and since their algorithm missed it, teams of trolls will be flagging this for some kind of hate speech and as a dangerous conspiracy theory.

 

and then post it wherever and email it to all your homies that still don't get it.

 

all love

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, hardtruthspitta said:

"Green screens, chroma-key screens, zero-gravity air-planes, video manipulation, wires, and harnesses. Just some of the ways that space is faked. What does it say about a society that has ignored so much evidence?"

 

short and just a great compilation of some of the dumbest shit they actually released...

 

 

 

I know it's hilarious 😂

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

😂 It's the truth I'll have you know...........

 

NASA shares incredible video of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin's footprints on the moon - which are STILL visible 53 years after the Apollo II mission 

NASA revealed an incredible video of the moon that zooms in on Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin's footprints on the lunar surface - still visible 53 years after the Apollo 11 landing. 'Today marks the anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing - the first time that humans stepped on the surface of another world,' the space agency said on Twitter. 'This video from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter shows the astronauts' tracks, still there after all this time.'

 

image_2022-07-21_071039690.png.4e51d4a82e37008dc6629419fb6448d6.png

 

666708080_amoonx.PNG.335b784c50e3c4945bfa6c0b93dfa940.PNG

 

Today in the Daily Fail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/20/2022 at 3:55 PM, hardtruthspitta said:

"Green screens, chroma-key screens, zero-gravity air-planes, video manipulation, wires, and harnesses. Just some of the ways that space is faked. What does it say about a society that has ignored so much evidence?"

 

short and just a great compilation of some of the dumbest shit they actually released...

 

 

this is important, more now than ever. this is because of how fast their technology is accelerating. in a short time, no one will be able to tell the difference. i recommend saving this. youtube hates this and since their algorithm missed it, teams of trolls will be flagging this for some kind of hate speech and as a dangerous conspiracy theory.

 

and then post it wherever and email it to all your homies that still don't get it.

 

all love

 

Just because what they are showing us is fake, doesn't mean that "the space is fake" 🤦‍♂️

They are hiding something up there, they don't want everyone to see and know some things.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are asking this about the same society that, for going on three years now, has accepted a non existing pandemic due to a non existing virus? The same society that still wears a clothe mask over their faces to protect themselves from the non existing virus. You are asking this of a society that now has about a hundred or so "genders"? Are you suggesting a society of people who can't wait for the next Marvel comic book character movie might not be sophisticated enough to recognize NASA's shenanigans? More importantly, are you really going to start yet another NASA thread on this site? 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  

18 hours ago, XelNaga said:

Just because what they are showing us is fake, doesn't mean that "the space is fake" 🤦‍♂️

They are hiding something up there, they don't want everyone to see and know some things.

none of us know what space is and damn right my brother

14 hours ago, Bombadil said:

MOD NOTE: Flat Earth discussions are to be posed in the thread titled

 

Anything here relating to flat Earth will be moved

 

No reply necessary

good shit - thanks

would love to just focus on the most obvious shit these clowns release to the public for this thread

11 hours ago, KingKitty said:

Are asking this about the same society that, for going on three years now, has accepted a non existing pandemic due to a non existing virus? The same society that still wears a clothe mask over their faces to protect themselves from the non existing virus. You are asking this of a society that now has about a hundred or so "genders"? Are you suggesting a society of people who can't wait for the next Marvel comic book character movie might not be sophisticated enough to recognize NASA's shenanigans?

excellent observation

11 hours ago, KingKitty said:

More importantly, are you really going to start yet another NASA thread on this site?

this is not a nasa thread my man... its all of these mofks... chinese clowns in space that they released...

Since the International Fake Space Station (ISS) has no running water, no sinks, no showers, or normal toilets, so you can imagine that this would pose a challenge for astronauts. Because according to their narratives, water would float away from the container in microgravity, drinking fluids in space require astronauts to suck liquid from a bag through a straw. These bags can be refilled at water stations through a low pressurized hose. Here's a link https://youtu.be/WPKZaI5ACC8...

tools!

all these bitches

thanks for the comments

out

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/22/2022 at 8:40 PM, hardtruthspitta said:

  

none of us know what space is and damn right my brother

good shit - thanks

would love to just focus on the most obvious shit these clowns release to the public for this thread

excellent observation

this is not a nasa thread my man... its all of these mofks... chinese clowns in space that they released...

Since the International Fake Space Station (ISS) has no running water, no sinks, no showers, or normal toilets, so you can imagine that this would pose a challenge for astronauts. Because according to their narratives, water would float away from the container in microgravity, drinking fluids in space require astronauts to suck liquid from a bag through a straw. These bags can be refilled at water stations through a low pressurized hose. Here's a link https://youtu.be/WPKZaI5ACC8...

tools!

all these bitches

thanks for the comments

out

I love your spirit, my friend. And I agree, it's all a big bullshit show, no matter who's on front of the camera. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
On 7/20/2022 at 2:55 PM, hardtruthspitta said:

"Green screens, chroma-key screens, zero-gravity air-planes, video manipulation, wires, and harnesses. Just some of the ways that space is faked. What does it say about a society that has ignored so much evidence?"

 

short and just a great compilation of some of the dumbest shit they actually released...

 

 

this is important, more now than ever. this is because of how fast their technology is accelerating. in a short time, no one will be able to tell the difference. i recommend saving this. youtube hates this and since their algorithm missed it, teams of trolls will be flagging this for some kind of hate speech and as a dangerous conspiracy theory.

 

and then post it wherever and email it to all your homies that still don't get it.

 

 

One of the reason people don't "get it" is because there are rather simple explanations for this entire video. I'll just pick 3 at random, are you bold enough to concede you have been fooled?

 

Number one suggests that criss-cross pattern he is standing in front of is some sort of green screen thingy, or blue screen, whatever. It is neither. He is performing some experiments for college kids and the grid acts as a reference point to the distance objects ttravel. You can actually download each experiment, all explained on this page:

Collisions - Astro Academy: Principia - Astro Academy: Principia

 

 

 

Number 2 refers to the endless number of video transmission artefacts which occur every now and again and usually where the quality drops well below HD. I'd ask the question, why does it indicate any fakery? How would any filming technique cause this as a side effect anyway.

 

Number 3 refers to the astronaut going around the corner. This is called a merge edit. If you place your cursor on the wall area to the left as he disappears you will notice the whole wall changes suddenly. That;s two different time frames merged together. Simple. I'll do a gif if you don't believe me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

yyyyyyy.jpg

 

I would ask you a question. Do you understand what inertia is?

 

Because if you don't and clearly the maker of that silly meme does not, then the simple solution to this may not be easy to comprehend. I'll try and draw an analogy for you.

 

Let's say you are on a train and you jump up. In the compartment you go straight up. From outside you are moving at the speed of the train and going sideways. Basically you carry inertia from the train. On Earth, we are all travelling with the ground and carry that same inertia. When you jump up, you come down on the same spot. So basically Felix went straight up, carrying the same rotational speed as the Earth (his inertia) and was vertically above where he took off from. Now, of course there are winds which move the craft in various directions, but nothing drastic to alter his general position.

 

He jumps out and comes back roughly where he set off from. No, the Earth did not forget to spin and no, Felix did not mysteriously lose his inertia, defying the laws of physics. All so very simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oddsnsods said:

This has been doing the rounds lately. Surprised flerth posse arnt all over it_________

 

 

Yeah, try that with some water, or anything that moves directly in front of the subject. Won't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Arnie said:

Yeah, try that with some water, or anything that moves directly in front of the subject. Won't work.

That's where the use of CGI comes in handy. 

 

And that should be, "doesn't work." Water is inanimate. To suggest it "won't work" is like referring to a stubborn mule that refuses to do labor. "Doesn't work" works for water, as it suggest that the inanimate object won't work correctly in the example given by the video presenter. 

 

4 hours ago, Arnie said:

Let's say you are on a train and you jump up. In the compartment you go straight up. From outside you are moving at the speed of the train and going sideways. Basically you carry inertia from the train. On Earth, we are all travelling with the ground and carry that same inertia. When you jump up, you come down on the same spot. So basically Felix went straight up, carrying the same rotational speed as the Earth (his inertia) and was vertically above where he took off from. Now, of course there are winds which move the craft in various directions, but nothing drastic to alter his general position.

Now you are just opening up a can of worms called The Flat Earthers. 

 

What's interesting is, all the "facts" you state are merely the main narrative as presented by TPTB. That is, you aren't really saying anything original nor even any suggested variations on the mainstream narrative. You just Polly want a cracker it all right back at folks. It's as though you and your like are void of any original, creative thought. Feverishly defending science and NASA. You won't even believe your own eyes when any child can clearly see the video anomalies in just about ever post from the official NASA site, because you are...

 

 

Edited by KingKitty
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, KingKitty said:

That's where the use of CGI comes in handy

 

Oh dear, the generic "they used CGI" statement. That won't work either because the time frame to get CGI done is ludicrously time consuming and the ISS has been doing live video feeds for some considerable time and quite enormous amounts of it. If you think this video below is CGI, then you are simply not informed about how CGI is used, how accurate it can be and how subtle flaws in the footage give the game away.

 

49 minutes ago, KingKitty said:

And that should be, "doesn't work." Water is inanimate. To suggest it "won't work" is like referring to a stubborn mule that refuses to do labor. "Doesn't work" works for water, as it suggest that the inanimate object won't work correctly in the example given by the video presenter.

 

False. Either of those two statements can be used. If you wan't to play the grammar police, at least make it something correct - and why exactly would you want to do that anyway? This forum has hundreds of posts with "should of" / "would of" / their instead of they're. Hardly makes the content wrong and I failed to see you performing any grammar police duty on any of those posts.

 

Edit: I just noticed an hilarious self contradiction you just made. In red above. Lol.

 

49 minutes ago, KingKitty said:

Now you are just opening up a can of worms called The Flat Earthers.

 

Nonsense. I am opening a can of physics that correctly explains reality.

 

49 minutes ago, KingKitty said:

What's interesting is, all the "facts" you state are merely the main narrative as presented by TPTB. T

 

A totally false statement. My "facts" are simple physics and nothing to do with any mainstream or "TPTB".

49 minutes ago, KingKitty said:

That is, you aren't really saying anything original nor even any suggested variations on the mainstream narrative. You just Polly want a cracker it all right back at folks. It's as though you and your like are void of any original, creative thought. Feverishly defending science and NASA. You won't even believe your own eyes when any child can clearly see the video anomalies in just about ever post from the official NASA site, because you are...

 

Hmmm, it's almost as though you have zero to say in reply to my physics explanation so resort to the ad-hominem route that "you and your like" routinely take. Now offer a counter explanation for inertia, because the beuty of this statement is that everyone can do it for themselves every day of their lives and see it in action. Can't you?

 

49 minutes ago, KingKitty said:

Feverishly defending science and NASA.

 

Nope, no fever here, just debating when people get things wrong. You seem to be feverishly attacking them. If my science is wrong, let's here yours.

 

49 minutes ago, KingKitty said:

You won't even believe your own eyes when any child can clearly see the video anomalies in just about ever post from the official NASA site, because you are...

 

Well that isn't true at all. A child will see stuff and be heavily influenced by what it is told. That is predicably how NASA attackers in general see things. It's funny that the more you know about science and space travel the less you see these made up anomalies, and obviously the reverse of that is true.

 

So are you going to tiptoe around the subject firing ad-hominems whilst avoiding my replies, or have you got something tangible to say?

 

Edited by Arnie
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Arnie said:

 

Oh dear, the generic "they used CGI" statement. That won't work either because the time frame to get CGI done is ludicrously time consuming and the ISS has been doing live video feeds for some considerable time and quite enormous amounts of it. If you think this video below is CGI, then you are simply not informed about how CGI is used, how accurate it can be and how subtle flaws in the footage give the game away.

 

 

False. Either of those two statements can be used. If you wan't to play the grammar police, at least make it something correct - and why exactly would you want to do that anyway? This forum has hundreds of posts with "should of" / "would of" / their instead of they're. Hardly makes the content wrong and I failed to see you performing any grammar police duty on any of those posts.

 

Edit: I just noticed an hilarious self contradiction you just made. In red above. Lol.

 

 

Nonsense. I am opening a can of physics that correctly explains reality.

 

 

A totally false statement. My "facts" are simple physics and nothing to do with any mainstream or "TPTB".

 

Hmmm, it's almost as though you have zero to say in reply to my physics explanation so resort to the ad-hominem route that "you and your like" routinely take. Now offer a counter explanation for inertia, because the beuty of this statement is that everyone can do it for themselves every day of their lives and see it in action. Can't you?

 

 

Nope, no fever here, just debating when people get things wrong. You seem to be feverishly attacking them. If my science is wrong, let's here yours.

 

 

Well that isn't true at all. A child will see stuff and be heavily influenced by what it is told. That is predicably how NASA attackers in general see things. It's funny that the more you know about science and space travel the less you see these made up anomalies, and obviously the reverse of that is true.

 

So are you going to tiptoe around the subject firing ad-hominems whilst avoiding my replies, or have you got something tangible to say?

 

Brilliant! Reality, you say?

 

The grammar thing was just me winding you up. I figured you to be the kind of individual who would get his knickers in a bunch over that...and I was right. Keep on believing in the science. After all, it's saved a billion or so people from a pandemic and is steering us away from destroying our own planet with cow farts.

 

Riddle me this, Captain Physics, why don't we go to the moon anymore? Our technology (science!) is light years ahead of what we (US of A) had in the 1960's, yet we don't seem to have any more interest in actually going to the moon? We should at least have moon bases up there by now? I'm sure you have a perfectly reasonable explanation for that query? Now remember, I'm not as intelligent as you, so please type slowly.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, Arnie? I think we just got off on the wrong foot. I'm not here to debate physics with you, which is why I am not replying to you various explanations.

 

Most of us here understand basic physics and grammar. What the true debate is over is: Why does NASA create videos with so many "digital anomalies"? For every sensible video you can post of the space station, I can match it with one that clearly shows anomalies that are a direct result of computer generated images and/or special effects. I've worked in CGI, computer graphics, etc., so I can spot them easily. 

 

Proving that the average citizen is not very physics savvy does not mean that the various NASA videos aren't doctored. It only take one lie being exposed to unravel the whole ball of yarn. There are more than enough videos online, from NASA's official releases, that clearly show some anomalies that deserve credible explanations, if anything, because we pay taxes for this nonsense. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

 

Hardly amzing sleight of hand and from a rather daft flat earther. Is it ok to post that junk outside of the walled off thread? If so, here is Professor Dave slapping him about:

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, KingKitty said:

Brilliant! Reality, you say?

 

 

Well yes, the response to the vertical ascent, the carried intertia and his subsequent space jump. So yes, reality I do say.

 

5 hours ago, KingKitty said:

The grammar thing was just me winding you up. I figured you to be the kind of individual who would get his knickers in a bunch over that...and I was right. Keep on believing in the science. After all, it's saved a billion or so people from a pandemic and is steering us away from destroying our own planet with cow farts.

 

That is called trolling and your second sentence is a non sequitur. Two conspiracies in one to deny science.

 

5 hours ago, KingKitty said:

Riddle me this, Captain Physics, why don't we go to the moon anymore? Our technology (science!) is light years ahead of what we (US of A) had in the 1960's, yet we don't seem to have any more interest in actually going to the moon? We should at least have moon bases up there by now? I'm sure you have a perfectly reasonable explanation for that query? Now remember, I'm not as intelligent as you, so please type slowly.

 

It costs a fortune. They were already pulling the rug during Apollo 12 from audience response, held on for the Apollo 13 emergency and tuned out in their droves for the rest. Nixon hated the space race and ever since nobody wanted to stump up the cash. We are going back real soon but sadly I fully expect lots of noise and silly claims to be made.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, KingKitty said:

You know, Arnie? I think we just got off on the wrong foot. I'm not here to debate physics with you, which is why I am not replying to you various explanations.

 

I don't carry grudges or offend easily.

 

5 hours ago, KingKitty said:

Most of us here understand basic physics and grammar. What the true debate is over is: Why does NASA create videos with so many "digital anomalies"? For every sensible video you can post of the space station, I can match it with one that clearly shows anomalies that are a direct result of computer generated images and/or special effects. I've worked in CGI, computer graphics, etc., so I can spot them easily.

 

Nice circular argument. There aren't anomalies, there are video artefacts from transmission and erroneous claims.  I know many people in the media industry and they beg to disagree with what you say you "spot".

 

5 hours ago, KingKitty said:

Proving that the average citizen is not very physics savvy does not mean that the various NASA videos aren't doctored. It only take one lie being exposed to unravel the whole ball of yarn. There are more than enough videos online, from NASA's official releases, that clearly show some anomalies that deserve credible explanations, if anything, because we pay taxes for this nonsense.

 

Provide your best example. Just one and let's have a good old fashioned debate about them one at a time. Are you up for it?

 

Edited by Arnie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...